Development and Implementation
   of an Initial Transportation
  Planning Process for Federal
  Land Management Agencies

        Lewis G. Grimm, P.E.
        Planning Team Leader
           FHWA - EFLHD
Transportation Planning Directive
(23 U.S.C. Section 204)

  In consultation with the Secretary of each
  appropriate Federal land management agency,
  the (DOT) Secretary shall implement
  transportation planning procedures for Federal
  lands and tribal transportation facilities that are
  consistent with the planning processes required
  under sections 134 and 135 (State and
  Metropolitan Transportation Planning
  regulations).
FLH/Federal-Aid Similarities & Differences
 Similarities
         FLH and Fed-Aid planners are responsible for the oversight of Title
          23 and 49 funds.
         They are also responsible for providing guidance to partner agencies
          interpreting federal regulations and implementing the planning
          process.

 Differences
         Geography
         Partner agencies’ missions
         Level of involvement in plans and TIP/STIP development

 The question is:
    How do we better coordinate the similarities and bridge the differences, as
     appropriate at the various levels of planning?
Why Now?
    New initiatives underway by FLH to promote long
     range planning
     – National, regional and unit (local) level planning
     – Demonstrate “real” benefits from specific project
       coordination
    Linkages with FLH management systems and
     Federal-aid requirements
     – GIS Applications and data integration
     – FLH CMS requirement and metro CMPs
    Common Bottom line
     – Limited resources requires better leverage of knowledge
       and funding across both programs
Integrated State/Regional/Local
  Transportation Planning Process
                                  Fed-Aid Stewardship          and Oversight Umbrella

                                                 Statewide Long Range
                                                  Transportation Plan*
  *Long-Range Plans
  (20-30 yr Horizon, MPO                            MPO Regional
  Is fiscally constrained or                     Transportation Plan*
  “reasonably available”)
                                                City/County General Plan
                                                Transportation Element*



                                                          Project
                                                          Planning and
                                                          Implementation




                                                                                        Public Involvement
                                             MPO Transportation Improvement
                                                                                        Integrated at each level
                                                     Program (TIP)**

     **Project Identification,                   Statewide Transportation
    Selection, & Programming                   Improvement Program (STIP)**
(4-6yr Horizon, fiscally constrained)
Proposed Multimodal Transportation Planning
    Process for FLMAs
                             FLHD Stewardship           and Oversight Umbrella

                                      National Transportation Plan*

                                       Regional Transportation
   *Long Range Plans                           Plan (RTP)*
(20-30 yr Horizon, not
 fiscally constrained or
‘reasonably available’)                  Unit Transportation Plan
                                          (NPS GMP or FWS CCP)*




                                             Project
                                             Planning and
                                             Implementation


                                                                                 **Project Identification,
                                                                                 Selection, &
                                                                                 Programming
                                       Regional Trans. Improvement               ( -6yr
                                                                                 (3-6yr Horizon,
                                            Program (RTIP)**                     fiscally constrained)
  Public Involvement                    National Transportation Improvement
  Integrated at each level                   Program (TIP)**
Grimm rpo2012
Grimm rpo2012
Fish & Wildlife Service Regions
Grimm rpo2012
Transportation Planning
Guidance for FLMAs
“Transportation planning with FLMAs needs to be
conducted in conjunction with governing FLMA
policies and with general comprehensive or master
planning for FLMA units. The coupling of U.S.
DOT regulations with FLMA policy and practices
has been undertaken to make FLMA transportation
planning unique, challenging, and beneficial to all
overseeing Departments and corresponding
agencies.”
Transportation Planning Guidance for Federal Land Management Agencies,
Final Draft for Review, 12-09-2011
Regional Long Range
Transportation Plan Elements
   Minimum 20-year horizon
   Process for updating every four to five years, or as
    determined to be appropriate by the agency
   Operational and management strategies
   Financial plan that demonstrates how the transportation plan
    can likely be implemented, indicates the identification of all
    public and private resources that are reasonably expected to
    be available to carry out the plan, and recommends any
    additional financing strategies for needed projects and
    programs.
LRTP Elements (Cont’d)

   Public involvement process
   Defined elements (as appropriate) of the respective FLMA’s
    national plan.
   For all regionally significant projects, the FLMA region or
    unit should consider all elements of the project and
    collaborate with appropriate stakeholders early in the
    planning process.
   Existing conditions review and future forecast of conditions
   Natural and cultural resource analyses and preservation /
    improvement strategies
Public Involvement

 “FLMA agencies shall include reasonable and
 appropriate opportunities for public involvement
 in the development of their transportation plans.
 This action should be coordinated with state DOT
 and MPO activities where appropriate. Citizens
 and other interested parties shall be provided with
 a reasonable opportunity to comment on the long-
 range plans.”
 Transportation Planning Guidance for Federal Land Management Agencies,
 Final Draft for Review, 12-09-2011
Specific Actions for FLMAs
At a minimum, the public involvement plan component of any
   FLMA transportation plan should include the following :
   Documentation of the public involvement process
   Stakeholder plan to determine appropriate stakeholders
   Adequate public notice of public involvement activities and ample
    time for public review and comment at key decision points
   Early and continuous public involvement opportunities throughout
    the planning and programming process
   Explicit consideration and response to public comment
   Consideration of the needs of traditionally underserved population
    groups, including low‐income and minority citizens
Typical Public Involvement
Processes Being Employed
   State DOT coordination/collaboration using
    Statewide multimodal LRTP update processes
   MPO/RPO RTP development/update processes
   FLMA national and regional websites (NPS
    Planning, Environment, and Public Comment
    (PEPC) website, FWS Visitor Surveys, etc.)
   Federal Register Notices (Alaska LRTP)
   Outreach to “Friends Groups” and general public
    via brochures, e-mail, and social media sites
Experiences to Date

 Assessment of effectiveness still being
  determined
 No obvious “best” techniques have yet
  been identified
 Each FLMA unit, regional, and national
  planning and public involvement process is
  relatively unique to some degree
 Stay tuned for updates
Questions/Discussion

More Related Content

PDF
Senate Bill Summary 110411
PDF
FHWA MAP-21 Summary
PPTX
Fixing America's Surface Transportation (FAST) Act
PDF
Final TRB paper_061914_certified
PDF
Transportation Improvement Program 2014 - 2019
PDF
Rural Long Range Transportation Plan 2005 - 2030
PPTX
Johnson gilmer presentation
PPTX
Map 21 webinar 081312
Senate Bill Summary 110411
FHWA MAP-21 Summary
Fixing America's Surface Transportation (FAST) Act
Final TRB paper_061914_certified
Transportation Improvement Program 2014 - 2019
Rural Long Range Transportation Plan 2005 - 2030
Johnson gilmer presentation
Map 21 webinar 081312

What's hot (11)

PDF
Hattiesburg final document
PPTX
SPAN IFMIS Project in Indonesia
PDF
DTPW's Rapid Transit Corridors Conceptual Financial Plan Proposal
PDF
Combined strategy day session
PPTX
Cycle 2 Environmental and Social Equity Presentation
PDF
Final EIS Part 1
PPTX
15-03 Relief Line Public Meeting Presentation
ZIP
Point A to B - CalACT Spring 2009 presentation
PDF
Analysis Of Plans
PPTX
Investing the marginal dollar for Maternal and Newborn Health: Geographic acc...
PDF
Scarborough Subway Extension - Public Consultation Plan
Hattiesburg final document
SPAN IFMIS Project in Indonesia
DTPW's Rapid Transit Corridors Conceptual Financial Plan Proposal
Combined strategy day session
Cycle 2 Environmental and Social Equity Presentation
Final EIS Part 1
15-03 Relief Line Public Meeting Presentation
Point A to B - CalACT Spring 2009 presentation
Analysis Of Plans
Investing the marginal dollar for Maternal and Newborn Health: Geographic acc...
Scarborough Subway Extension - Public Consultation Plan
Ad

Viewers also liked (8)

PDF
Ouellette rpo2012
PPTX
Rural Approaches to Performance Measurement: Planning and Programming
PPT
Service and Fare Equity
PDF
Belz rpo2012
PPTX
Planning for Bicycling and Pedestrian Accommodations
PDF
Lessons Learned from Irene: Regional Planning Commission Involvement in Recov...
PPTX
Livability Analyses: Fine Scale
PPTX
Moving Towards Resilience in Vermont
Ouellette rpo2012
Rural Approaches to Performance Measurement: Planning and Programming
Service and Fare Equity
Belz rpo2012
Planning for Bicycling and Pedestrian Accommodations
Lessons Learned from Irene: Regional Planning Commission Involvement in Recov...
Livability Analyses: Fine Scale
Moving Towards Resilience in Vermont
Ad

Similar to Grimm rpo2012 (20)

PDF
Transportation Planning 101: The Role of Resource and Regulatory Agencies in ...
PDF
Citizen Guide to Transportation Decision Making
PPTX
2040 RTP Leadership Symposium II 3.13.13
PPTX
2040 RTP Leadership Symposium 8.24.12
PDF
Incorporating planned trails projects into the nepa process for highways
PDF
Aug 23, 2010 entrips evaluation presentation.ppt
PDF
Countywide Transit Network Study: Introductory Public Meeting
PDF
Freight and public transport planning initiatives conference 24 november 2011
PPTX
2040 RTP Community Advisory Committee/Core Technical Team #1
PDF
Rolling Climate Change, Transportation & Land Use Planning into One Innovativ...
PPTX
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
PPTX
2040 RTP October 2012 Public Workshop Presentation
PPTX
Css classes 19 22 - developing compatible supportive design 120309
PPTX
2040 RTP Community Advisory Committee/Core Technical Team #2
PPT
oakland county parks cost recovery
PDF
Global city services benchmarking v1
PDF
Adderly rpo2012
PPTX
Css class 8 multi-disciplinary teaming 120309
PDF
Your Vision, Our Future - General Overview Presentation
Transportation Planning 101: The Role of Resource and Regulatory Agencies in ...
Citizen Guide to Transportation Decision Making
2040 RTP Leadership Symposium II 3.13.13
2040 RTP Leadership Symposium 8.24.12
Incorporating planned trails projects into the nepa process for highways
Aug 23, 2010 entrips evaluation presentation.ppt
Countywide Transit Network Study: Introductory Public Meeting
Freight and public transport planning initiatives conference 24 november 2011
2040 RTP Community Advisory Committee/Core Technical Team #1
Rolling Climate Change, Transportation & Land Use Planning into One Innovativ...
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
2040 RTP October 2012 Public Workshop Presentation
Css classes 19 22 - developing compatible supportive design 120309
2040 RTP Community Advisory Committee/Core Technical Team #2
oakland county parks cost recovery
Global city services benchmarking v1
Adderly rpo2012
Css class 8 multi-disciplinary teaming 120309
Your Vision, Our Future - General Overview Presentation

More from RPO America (20)

PDF
Rural Public Engagement Strategies in LA
PDF
North Central RTPO (PA) Public Engagement Process in Rural Areas
PPTX
Matthew BikePed Infrastructure in Rural Areas Peer Exchange
PDF
Kelly from AARP presentation on bike ped infrastructure in rural areas
PPTX
Mandla from AARP Bike-Ped Infrastructure in Rural areas
PPTX
Transit and Mobility in Rural Transportation Safety
PPTX
RPO America and RPO Council Orientation: Rural and Regional Transportation Roles
PPTX
RPO America Peer Exchange: Rural Transportation Planning Programs
PPTX
Electric vehicle infrastructure in rural areas
PPTX
Tennessee DOT- TEVI Plan coordination & EV
PPTX
Electric Vehicle infrastructure planning in Rural Planning Organizations
PPTX
PEL implementation tools.pptx
PPTX
Henry Underwood, Presentation on Linking Transportation & Environment in Sout...
PPTX
Cheng Yan, FHWA PEL Overview
PPTX
CARTS Microtransit—Innovation in Rural Mobility
PPTX
BCGo: Microtransit System Operating throughout Calhoun County, MI
PDF
Shared. Connected. Sustainable.
PDF
Microtransit and Digital Infrastructure
PDF
Microtransit Planning & Implementation Lessons from the North Carolina Experi...
PPTX
Microtransit Overview: A Research Perspective
Rural Public Engagement Strategies in LA
North Central RTPO (PA) Public Engagement Process in Rural Areas
Matthew BikePed Infrastructure in Rural Areas Peer Exchange
Kelly from AARP presentation on bike ped infrastructure in rural areas
Mandla from AARP Bike-Ped Infrastructure in Rural areas
Transit and Mobility in Rural Transportation Safety
RPO America and RPO Council Orientation: Rural and Regional Transportation Roles
RPO America Peer Exchange: Rural Transportation Planning Programs
Electric vehicle infrastructure in rural areas
Tennessee DOT- TEVI Plan coordination & EV
Electric Vehicle infrastructure planning in Rural Planning Organizations
PEL implementation tools.pptx
Henry Underwood, Presentation on Linking Transportation & Environment in Sout...
Cheng Yan, FHWA PEL Overview
CARTS Microtransit—Innovation in Rural Mobility
BCGo: Microtransit System Operating throughout Calhoun County, MI
Shared. Connected. Sustainable.
Microtransit and Digital Infrastructure
Microtransit Planning & Implementation Lessons from the North Carolina Experi...
Microtransit Overview: A Research Perspective

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
Comparative analysis of machine learning models for fake news detection in so...
PDF
Produktkatalog für HOBO Datenlogger, Wetterstationen, Sensoren, Software und ...
PPT
What is a Computer? Input Devices /output devices
PPTX
MicrosoftCybserSecurityReferenceArchitecture-April-2025.pptx
PDF
Developing a website for English-speaking practice to English as a foreign la...
PDF
The influence of sentiment analysis in enhancing early warning system model f...
PPTX
2018-HIPAA-Renewal-Training for executives
PPTX
Final SEM Unit 1 for mit wpu at pune .pptx
PDF
A proposed approach for plagiarism detection in Myanmar Unicode text
PPT
Module 1.ppt Iot fundamentals and Architecture
PPT
Galois Field Theory of Risk: A Perspective, Protocol, and Mathematical Backgr...
PPTX
Build Your First AI Agent with UiPath.pptx
PPTX
TEXTILE technology diploma scope and career opportunities
PDF
ENT215_Completing-a-large-scale-migration-and-modernization-with-AWS.pdf
PDF
Credit Without Borders: AI and Financial Inclusion in Bangladesh
PDF
Convolutional neural network based encoder-decoder for efficient real-time ob...
PDF
Taming the Chaos: How to Turn Unstructured Data into Decisions
PDF
NewMind AI Weekly Chronicles – August ’25 Week III
PPTX
Chapter 5: Probability Theory and Statistics
PPTX
Configure Apache Mutual Authentication
Comparative analysis of machine learning models for fake news detection in so...
Produktkatalog für HOBO Datenlogger, Wetterstationen, Sensoren, Software und ...
What is a Computer? Input Devices /output devices
MicrosoftCybserSecurityReferenceArchitecture-April-2025.pptx
Developing a website for English-speaking practice to English as a foreign la...
The influence of sentiment analysis in enhancing early warning system model f...
2018-HIPAA-Renewal-Training for executives
Final SEM Unit 1 for mit wpu at pune .pptx
A proposed approach for plagiarism detection in Myanmar Unicode text
Module 1.ppt Iot fundamentals and Architecture
Galois Field Theory of Risk: A Perspective, Protocol, and Mathematical Backgr...
Build Your First AI Agent with UiPath.pptx
TEXTILE technology diploma scope and career opportunities
ENT215_Completing-a-large-scale-migration-and-modernization-with-AWS.pdf
Credit Without Borders: AI and Financial Inclusion in Bangladesh
Convolutional neural network based encoder-decoder for efficient real-time ob...
Taming the Chaos: How to Turn Unstructured Data into Decisions
NewMind AI Weekly Chronicles – August ’25 Week III
Chapter 5: Probability Theory and Statistics
Configure Apache Mutual Authentication

Grimm rpo2012

  • 1. Development and Implementation of an Initial Transportation Planning Process for Federal Land Management Agencies Lewis G. Grimm, P.E. Planning Team Leader FHWA - EFLHD
  • 2. Transportation Planning Directive (23 U.S.C. Section 204) In consultation with the Secretary of each appropriate Federal land management agency, the (DOT) Secretary shall implement transportation planning procedures for Federal lands and tribal transportation facilities that are consistent with the planning processes required under sections 134 and 135 (State and Metropolitan Transportation Planning regulations).
  • 3. FLH/Federal-Aid Similarities & Differences Similarities  FLH and Fed-Aid planners are responsible for the oversight of Title 23 and 49 funds.  They are also responsible for providing guidance to partner agencies interpreting federal regulations and implementing the planning process. Differences  Geography  Partner agencies’ missions  Level of involvement in plans and TIP/STIP development The question is:  How do we better coordinate the similarities and bridge the differences, as appropriate at the various levels of planning?
  • 4. Why Now?  New initiatives underway by FLH to promote long range planning – National, regional and unit (local) level planning – Demonstrate “real” benefits from specific project coordination  Linkages with FLH management systems and Federal-aid requirements – GIS Applications and data integration – FLH CMS requirement and metro CMPs  Common Bottom line – Limited resources requires better leverage of knowledge and funding across both programs
  • 5. Integrated State/Regional/Local Transportation Planning Process Fed-Aid Stewardship and Oversight Umbrella Statewide Long Range Transportation Plan* *Long-Range Plans (20-30 yr Horizon, MPO MPO Regional Is fiscally constrained or Transportation Plan* “reasonably available”) City/County General Plan Transportation Element* Project Planning and Implementation Public Involvement MPO Transportation Improvement Integrated at each level Program (TIP)** **Project Identification, Statewide Transportation Selection, & Programming Improvement Program (STIP)** (4-6yr Horizon, fiscally constrained)
  • 6. Proposed Multimodal Transportation Planning Process for FLMAs FLHD Stewardship and Oversight Umbrella National Transportation Plan* Regional Transportation *Long Range Plans Plan (RTP)* (20-30 yr Horizon, not fiscally constrained or ‘reasonably available’) Unit Transportation Plan (NPS GMP or FWS CCP)* Project Planning and Implementation **Project Identification, Selection, & Programming Regional Trans. Improvement ( -6yr (3-6yr Horizon, Program (RTIP)** fiscally constrained) Public Involvement National Transportation Improvement Integrated at each level Program (TIP)**
  • 9. Fish & Wildlife Service Regions
  • 11. Transportation Planning Guidance for FLMAs “Transportation planning with FLMAs needs to be conducted in conjunction with governing FLMA policies and with general comprehensive or master planning for FLMA units. The coupling of U.S. DOT regulations with FLMA policy and practices has been undertaken to make FLMA transportation planning unique, challenging, and beneficial to all overseeing Departments and corresponding agencies.” Transportation Planning Guidance for Federal Land Management Agencies, Final Draft for Review, 12-09-2011
  • 12. Regional Long Range Transportation Plan Elements  Minimum 20-year horizon  Process for updating every four to five years, or as determined to be appropriate by the agency  Operational and management strategies  Financial plan that demonstrates how the transportation plan can likely be implemented, indicates the identification of all public and private resources that are reasonably expected to be available to carry out the plan, and recommends any additional financing strategies for needed projects and programs.
  • 13. LRTP Elements (Cont’d)  Public involvement process  Defined elements (as appropriate) of the respective FLMA’s national plan.  For all regionally significant projects, the FLMA region or unit should consider all elements of the project and collaborate with appropriate stakeholders early in the planning process.  Existing conditions review and future forecast of conditions  Natural and cultural resource analyses and preservation / improvement strategies
  • 14. Public Involvement “FLMA agencies shall include reasonable and appropriate opportunities for public involvement in the development of their transportation plans. This action should be coordinated with state DOT and MPO activities where appropriate. Citizens and other interested parties shall be provided with a reasonable opportunity to comment on the long- range plans.” Transportation Planning Guidance for Federal Land Management Agencies, Final Draft for Review, 12-09-2011
  • 15. Specific Actions for FLMAs At a minimum, the public involvement plan component of any FLMA transportation plan should include the following :  Documentation of the public involvement process  Stakeholder plan to determine appropriate stakeholders  Adequate public notice of public involvement activities and ample time for public review and comment at key decision points  Early and continuous public involvement opportunities throughout the planning and programming process  Explicit consideration and response to public comment  Consideration of the needs of traditionally underserved population groups, including low‐income and minority citizens
  • 16. Typical Public Involvement Processes Being Employed  State DOT coordination/collaboration using Statewide multimodal LRTP update processes  MPO/RPO RTP development/update processes  FLMA national and regional websites (NPS Planning, Environment, and Public Comment (PEPC) website, FWS Visitor Surveys, etc.)  Federal Register Notices (Alaska LRTP)  Outreach to “Friends Groups” and general public via brochures, e-mail, and social media sites
  • 17. Experiences to Date  Assessment of effectiveness still being determined  No obvious “best” techniques have yet been identified  Each FLMA unit, regional, and national planning and public involvement process is relatively unique to some degree  Stay tuned for updates