The document discusses differing views on the role of reasoning and intuition in making moral judgments. Some research has emphasized the role of reasoning, while more recent research highlights the role of automatic emotional processes. There is tension around whether intuitions or reasons play a more critical role. Haidt argues that moral reasoning involves a conscious, slower process while moral intuition occurs unconsciously and is faster. He contends that reasoning still plays a role in moral judgments but likely as a post hoc attempt to rationalize intuitive judgments rather than determining them.