Reading the CogAT Report:
    A Parent’s Guide
Reading the CogAT Report
Reading the CogAT Report
Stanine Table
Stanine scares range from a low of I to a high of 9. Stanines are groupings of percentile ranks. A higher stanine
equates with a higher level of cognitive abilities development. A comparison of Stanines and Percentile Ranks are
summarized in the table below:


                                     Stanine           Percentile Rank        Description

                                        9                  96-99               Very High

                                        8                  89-95             Above Average

                                        7                  77-88             Above Average

                                        6                  60-76                Average

                                        5                  40-59                Average

                                        4                  23-39                Average

                                        3                  11-22             Below Average

                                        2                   4-10             Below Average

                                        1                   1-3                Very Low


Differences in percentile scores can lead to over interpretation of small differences in scores between individual students or
among scores for the same student. For example, there will be no observable differences in the classroom between a
student who has a Percentile Rank of 45 and one with a Percentile Rank of 55. They would both exhibit average levels of
development in a particular area. On the other hand, you would see observable differences in the classroom for students
with more than one stanine difference in their scores. Three different students with Stanines of 9, 6, and 4 will show clear
differences in the ways they approach learning and problem solving tasks, in the ways they interact with different
instructional strategies and leasing environments, in the rate in which they learn, and in the amounts and kinds of help they
need to learn successfully.

Adapted from “interpreting Cognitive Abilities Test Scores” Riverside Publishing
Reading the CogAT Report
Reading the CogAT Report
CogAT Score Profiles
CogAT score profiles identify both the level of the student’s scores and the pattern of scores across the
batteries.

The Level of Scores is represented by the student’s middle age stanine across the three sections of the
CogAT. For example, if a student scored in the 8th stanine for verbal, the 3rd stanine for quantitative, and
the 5th stanine for nonverbal, the middle age stanine used in the score profile would be 5th.

The Pattern of Score is indicated one of the following ways:

A Profile: The student’s verbal, quantitative, and nonverbal scores are roughly at the sAme level.

B Profile: One of the three scores is either aBove or Below the other two. The student’s profile will either
show a relative strength OR a relative weakness.

C Profile: There is one score above and one score below creating a Contrast. This student’s profile will
show both relative strength and a relative weakness.

E Profile: If a B or C profile represents a point difference in the SAS score of 12 points or more, it is
considered Extreme. An E profile calls attention to the scores difference.
Using CogAT to Inform Instruction


Visit the link below to view a short video
 from the makers of CogAT about how
 the assessment can be used to inform
         instruction for all students.

CogAT: Link Assessment to Instruction
Reading the CogAT Report
Footnotes




Information from the University of Minnesota website: http://oms.umn.edu/oms/mstp/tests_and_services/ability_tests/cogat6/footnotes.php
Reading the CogAT Score Report
Reading the CogAT Score Report
Reading the CogAT Score Report

More Related Content

PPT
Cognitive Abilities Test Parent Presentation
PPTX
Gifted and talented Students
PPT
CogAt Parent Presentation
PPT
CogAt Introduction
PPTX
What Does All This Testing Mean
PPTX
Itbs Presentation
PPT
I ready presentation for teacher training 9.16.2011
Cognitive Abilities Test Parent Presentation
Gifted and talented Students
CogAt Parent Presentation
CogAt Introduction
What Does All This Testing Mean
Itbs Presentation
I ready presentation for teacher training 9.16.2011

What's hot (20)

PDF
Warner Poster
PPTX
iReady Overview
PPTX
Simposio “Ciencias e Inglés en la evaluación internacional”: The principles o...
DOCX
Two-Scheme Grading Management and Student Profiling System
PPT
Professional growth plan
PPTX
E assessment authoring
PPTX
Diploma matrix 2015
PDF
TNova L17 ETHAN A MOHR 5089
PPTX
Placement tests
PDF
English placement test
PPT
Forest Hills Mmc
PPTX
Act seminar presentation
PPTX
The ACT Test
PPTX
5 2016 tept-pst overview - teacher’s english proficiency test (tept) and pr...
PDF
Dep ed order do-s2016_55
PPTX
Principles of assessment (Belinda Cerdá, Cambridge English) - Simposio CiEnglish
PPT
7 Keys to College Readiness Overview
PPTX
Pivot INSPECT® Reading assessment and diagnostic (RAPS 360)
Warner Poster
iReady Overview
Simposio “Ciencias e Inglés en la evaluación internacional”: The principles o...
Two-Scheme Grading Management and Student Profiling System
Professional growth plan
E assessment authoring
Diploma matrix 2015
TNova L17 ETHAN A MOHR 5089
Placement tests
English placement test
Forest Hills Mmc
Act seminar presentation
The ACT Test
5 2016 tept-pst overview - teacher’s english proficiency test (tept) and pr...
Dep ed order do-s2016_55
Principles of assessment (Belinda Cerdá, Cambridge English) - Simposio CiEnglish
7 Keys to College Readiness Overview
Pivot INSPECT® Reading assessment and diagnostic (RAPS 360)
Ad

Similar to Interpreting cog at_data_powerpoint_parent_version (20)

PPTX
grades record dsn,k,nhj,kj.xbvbmnghghbbd
PDF
AIOU Code 697 Assessment in Science Education Solved Assignment 1.pdf
PPTX
AIOU Code 697 Assessment in Science Education Solved Assignment 1.pptx
PDF
INTERPRETING TEST SCORES ............................
PPTX
Norms and Interpretation of Test Scores.pptx
PDF
Individualized-Data-Report_Sample
PPTX
Spe 501 class 11
PPTX
Standardized assessments
PPTX
Presentation2.pptx
PPTX
Sat 10 (2013) presentation for parents online (eng approved by ms.kate) (1)
PPTX
Sat 10 (2013) presentation
PPT
Analyzing-Test-items-of-assessmentsg.ppt
PPTX
Six steps for avoiding misinterpretations
PDF
Wj definitions
PPTX
Development of Norms this is presentation.pptx
PPTX
Test norms.pptx
PPTX
Interpretation of test Scores
PDF
Jack Fletcher
PPTX
Defining sampling distribution of the sample mean for.pptx
PPT
Vertical Scale Scores
grades record dsn,k,nhj,kj.xbvbmnghghbbd
AIOU Code 697 Assessment in Science Education Solved Assignment 1.pdf
AIOU Code 697 Assessment in Science Education Solved Assignment 1.pptx
INTERPRETING TEST SCORES ............................
Norms and Interpretation of Test Scores.pptx
Individualized-Data-Report_Sample
Spe 501 class 11
Standardized assessments
Presentation2.pptx
Sat 10 (2013) presentation for parents online (eng approved by ms.kate) (1)
Sat 10 (2013) presentation
Analyzing-Test-items-of-assessmentsg.ppt
Six steps for avoiding misinterpretations
Wj definitions
Development of Norms this is presentation.pptx
Test norms.pptx
Interpretation of test Scores
Jack Fletcher
Defining sampling distribution of the sample mean for.pptx
Vertical Scale Scores
Ad

More from jejones (12)

PPT
Earth’s land features
PPTX
Bodies of water_1
PPT
Curriculum Night 3rd 2015-2016
PPSX
2014-2015 LMES Special Areas
PPTX
Zeigler Pic Collage
PPTX
Lego exploration
PPT
Sock hop
PPTX
2013 2014 5th Grade Curriculum Night PPT- Inside
PPS
Parent Portal Directions
PPT
2012-2013 AGP 5th Grade Curriculum Night
PPT
PPSX
Lmes agp outline[1]
Earth’s land features
Bodies of water_1
Curriculum Night 3rd 2015-2016
2014-2015 LMES Special Areas
Zeigler Pic Collage
Lego exploration
Sock hop
2013 2014 5th Grade Curriculum Night PPT- Inside
Parent Portal Directions
2012-2013 AGP 5th Grade Curriculum Night
Lmes agp outline[1]

Recently uploaded (20)

DOCX
Cambridge-Practice-Tests-for-IELTS-12.docx
PDF
Chinmaya Tiranga quiz Grand Finale.pdf
PDF
What if we spent less time fighting change, and more time building what’s rig...
PDF
HVAC Specification 2024 according to central public works department
PDF
AI-driven educational solutions for real-life interventions in the Philippine...
PDF
1.3 FINAL REVISED K-10 PE and Health CG 2023 Grades 4-10 (1).pdf
PDF
Uderstanding digital marketing and marketing stratergie for engaging the digi...
PDF
Environmental Education MCQ BD2EE - Share Source.pdf
PPTX
B.Sc. DS Unit 2 Software Engineering.pptx
PDF
Τίμαιος είναι φιλοσοφικός διάλογος του Πλάτωνα
PDF
Empowerment Technology for Senior High School Guide
PDF
My India Quiz Book_20210205121199924.pdf
PPTX
Chinmaya Tiranga Azadi Quiz (Class 7-8 )
PDF
International_Financial_Reporting_Standa.pdf
PDF
Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment .pdf
PPTX
CHAPTER IV. MAN AND BIOSPHERE AND ITS TOTALITY.pptx
PPTX
TNA_Presentation-1-Final(SAVE)) (1).pptx
PDF
BP 704 T. NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS (UNIT 2).pdf
PDF
David L Page_DCI Research Study Journey_how Methodology can inform one's prac...
PDF
Practical Manual AGRO-233 Principles and Practices of Natural Farming
Cambridge-Practice-Tests-for-IELTS-12.docx
Chinmaya Tiranga quiz Grand Finale.pdf
What if we spent less time fighting change, and more time building what’s rig...
HVAC Specification 2024 according to central public works department
AI-driven educational solutions for real-life interventions in the Philippine...
1.3 FINAL REVISED K-10 PE and Health CG 2023 Grades 4-10 (1).pdf
Uderstanding digital marketing and marketing stratergie for engaging the digi...
Environmental Education MCQ BD2EE - Share Source.pdf
B.Sc. DS Unit 2 Software Engineering.pptx
Τίμαιος είναι φιλοσοφικός διάλογος του Πλάτωνα
Empowerment Technology for Senior High School Guide
My India Quiz Book_20210205121199924.pdf
Chinmaya Tiranga Azadi Quiz (Class 7-8 )
International_Financial_Reporting_Standa.pdf
Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment .pdf
CHAPTER IV. MAN AND BIOSPHERE AND ITS TOTALITY.pptx
TNA_Presentation-1-Final(SAVE)) (1).pptx
BP 704 T. NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS (UNIT 2).pdf
David L Page_DCI Research Study Journey_how Methodology can inform one's prac...
Practical Manual AGRO-233 Principles and Practices of Natural Farming

Interpreting cog at_data_powerpoint_parent_version

  • 1. Reading the CogAT Report: A Parent’s Guide
  • 4. Stanine Table Stanine scares range from a low of I to a high of 9. Stanines are groupings of percentile ranks. A higher stanine equates with a higher level of cognitive abilities development. A comparison of Stanines and Percentile Ranks are summarized in the table below: Stanine Percentile Rank Description 9 96-99 Very High 8 89-95 Above Average 7 77-88 Above Average 6 60-76 Average 5 40-59 Average 4 23-39 Average 3 11-22 Below Average 2 4-10 Below Average 1 1-3 Very Low Differences in percentile scores can lead to over interpretation of small differences in scores between individual students or among scores for the same student. For example, there will be no observable differences in the classroom between a student who has a Percentile Rank of 45 and one with a Percentile Rank of 55. They would both exhibit average levels of development in a particular area. On the other hand, you would see observable differences in the classroom for students with more than one stanine difference in their scores. Three different students with Stanines of 9, 6, and 4 will show clear differences in the ways they approach learning and problem solving tasks, in the ways they interact with different instructional strategies and leasing environments, in the rate in which they learn, and in the amounts and kinds of help they need to learn successfully. Adapted from “interpreting Cognitive Abilities Test Scores” Riverside Publishing
  • 7. CogAT Score Profiles CogAT score profiles identify both the level of the student’s scores and the pattern of scores across the batteries. The Level of Scores is represented by the student’s middle age stanine across the three sections of the CogAT. For example, if a student scored in the 8th stanine for verbal, the 3rd stanine for quantitative, and the 5th stanine for nonverbal, the middle age stanine used in the score profile would be 5th. The Pattern of Score is indicated one of the following ways: A Profile: The student’s verbal, quantitative, and nonverbal scores are roughly at the sAme level. B Profile: One of the three scores is either aBove or Below the other two. The student’s profile will either show a relative strength OR a relative weakness. C Profile: There is one score above and one score below creating a Contrast. This student’s profile will show both relative strength and a relative weakness. E Profile: If a B or C profile represents a point difference in the SAS score of 12 points or more, it is considered Extreme. An E profile calls attention to the scores difference.
  • 8. Using CogAT to Inform Instruction Visit the link below to view a short video from the makers of CogAT about how the assessment can be used to inform instruction for all students. CogAT: Link Assessment to Instruction
  • 10. Footnotes Information from the University of Minnesota website: http://oms.umn.edu/oms/mstp/tests_and_services/ability_tests/cogat6/footnotes.php
  • 11. Reading the CogAT Score Report
  • 12. Reading the CogAT Score Report
  • 13. Reading the CogAT Score Report

Editor's Notes

  • #2: This PowerPoint presentation is designed to help you read and interpret your student’s CogAT results. Each slide contains an image and a “sound” icon. When you click on the “sound” icon, the slide will be narrated for you. Let’s learn to read the report!
  • #3: Do you have your student’s CogAT score report in front of you? Good! Let’s begin…The CogAT Test measures the level and pattern of cognitive development of a student compared to age mates and grade mates. These general reasoning abilities, which start developing at birth and continue through early adulthood, are influenced by experiences gained both in and out of school. The CogAT measures three different cognitive abilities. The verbal section measures a child’s ability to remember and transform sequences of English words, to understand them and to make inferences and judgments about them. The quantitative section measures a child’s understanding of basic quantitative concepts and relationships. The non-verbal section measures reasoning using pictures and geometric shapes. This section reduces the impact of language on the student’s score. The composite score is a total score for all three batteries.
  • #4: This section of the report is dedicated to students’ age scores. Students are grouped by age in one-month intervals from 4 years 11 months through 18+ years of age. The firstcolumn in the National Age Scores section shows the stanine scores. The stanine scale is a normalized standard score scale consisting of nine broad levels designated by the numbers one through nine. Stanines are provided to discourage over interpretation of small differences among student scores and percentile rankings. Thus, all students in the same stanine are considered similar. See the following slide for the stanine table used for the CogAT.The second column in the National Age Scores section shows your student’s percentile rank for each section and the composite. A percentile rank indicates the percentage of students in the same age group whose scores fall below the score obtained by a particular student. For example, if yourstudent obtains a percentile rank of 90 on the verbal battery, it means that 90 percent of students in the standardized sample scored below your student. A percentile rank of 50 is considered average.
  • #5: Refer to the previous slide for a discussion of stanine scores.
  • #6: This section also relates to your student’s AGE scores. It is a graphic representation of yourstudent’s scores for each of the batteries and the composite. Scores for each section of the assessment are indicated by a diamond shape within a score band. The score band represents the confidence interval. The confidence interval is dependent upon individual error scores. Error scores represent the error of measurement for each student. These things affect error scores:The student responds inconsistently to items in the same battery (i.e.. if the student misses easy items but correctly solves difficult items)If the student does well on one subtest in a section of the test but poorly on another subtest in the same batteryBased on the score information in this section, a score profile is created for your student. Advance to the next slide for a discussion of the score profiles.
  • #7: This is where you will yourstudent’s score profile. Advance to the next slide for information about the profiles that can be obtained on the CogAT.
  • #8: After reading this slide, follow the link on the next slide entitled “Using CogAT to Inform Instruction” to view a short video demonstrating how to use these profiles to guide and inform instruction.
  • #9: Visit the link on the slide to view a short video from the makers of CogAT about how the assessment can be used to inform instruction for all students.
  • #10: The section is comprised of information regarding the number of items in each section of the test, the number of items attempted by the student, and the raw score (or number of correct responses).Footnote symbols may be found next to the raw score for a particular student on particular section of the CogAT. See the following slide for a guide to these footnotes and what they mean.
  • #12: This section of the report is dedicated to students’ grade scores. The first column shows the stanine. The stanine scale is a normalized standard score scale consisting of nine broad levels designated by the numbers one through nine. Stanines are provided to discourage over interpretation of small differences among student scores and percentile rankings. Thus, all students in the same stanine are considered similar. See the slide 4 for the stanine table used for the CogAT.The last column shows the percentile rank for each section and the composite. A percentile rank indicates the percentage of students in the same grade whose scores fall below the score obtained by a particular student. For example, if a student obtains a percentile rank of 90 on the verbal battery, it means that 90 percent of students in the standardized sample scored below that student. A percentile rank of 50 is considered average.
  • #13: This is a written description of how to interpret your student’s score report.
  • #14: We hope you found this information about your student’s CogAT scores helpful. Please contact your student’s teacher for more information. Thanks for viewing this presentation!