Introduction to biosensors

Essays in Biochemistry (2016) 60 1–8
DOI: 10.1042/EBC20150001
Version of Record published
30 June 2016
Introduction to biosensors
Nikhil Bhalla, Pawan Jolly, Nello Formisano and Pedro Estrela
Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, U.K.
Correspondence: Pedro Estrela (p.estrela@bath.ac.uk)
Biosensors are nowadays ubiquitous in biomedical diagnosis as well as a wide range of
other areas such as point-of-care monitoring of treatment and disease progression, envi-
ronmental monitoring, food control, drug discovery, forensics and biomedical research. A
wide range of techniques can be used for the development of biosensors. Their coupling
with high-affinity biomolecules allows the sensitive and selective detection of a range of
analytes. We give a general introduction to biosensors and biosensing technologies, in-
cluding a brief historical overview, introducing key developments in the field and illustrat-
ing the breadth of biomolecular sensing strategies and the expansion of nanotechnological
approaches that are now available.
Introduction
A biosensor is a device that measures biological or chemical reactions by generating signals proportional
to the concentration of an analyte in the reaction. Biosensors are employed in applications such as disease
monitoring, drug discovery, and detection of pollutants, disease-causing micro-organisms and markers
that are indicators of a disease in bodily fluids (blood, urine, saliva, sweat). A typical biosensor is repre-
sented in Figure 1; it consists of the following components.
• Analyte: A substance of interest that needs detection. For instance, glucose is an ‘analyte’ in a biosen-
sor designed to detect glucose.
• Bioreceptor: A molecule that specifically recognises the analyte is known as a bioreceptor. Enzymes,
cells, aptamers, deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and antibodies are some examples of bioreceptors. The
process of signal generation (in the form of light, heat, pH, charge or mass change, etc.) upon inter-
action of the bioreceptor with the analyte is termed bio-recognition.
• Transducer: The transducer is an element that converts one form of energy into another. In a biosen-
sor the role of the transducer is to convert the bio-recognition event into a measurable signal. This
process of energy conversion is known as signalisation. Most transducers produce either optical or
electrical signals that are usually proportional to the amount of analyte–bioreceptor interactions.
• Electronics: This is the part of a biosensor that processes the transduced signal and prepares it for
display. It consists of complex electronic circuitry that performs signal conditioning such as amplifi-
cation and conversion of signals from analogue into the digital form. The processed signals are then
quantified by the display unit of the biosensor.
• Display: The display consists of a user interpretation system such as the liquid crystal display of a
computer or a direct printer that generates numbers or curves understandable by the user. This part
often consists of a combination of hardware and software that generates results of the biosensor in a
user-friendly manner. The output signal on the display can be numeric, graphic, tabular or an image,
depending on the requirements of the end user.
c
2016 The Author(s). Published by Portland Press Limited on behalf of the Biochemical Society. 1

DOI: 10.1042/EBC20150001
Figure 1. Schematic representation of a biosensor
Historical background
The history of biosensors dates back to as early as 1906 when M. Cremer [1] demonstrated that the concentration of an
acid in a liquid is proportional to the electric potential that arises between parts of the fluid located on opposite sides of
a glass membrane. However, it was only in 1909 that the concept of pH (hydrogen ion concentration) was introduced
by Søren Peder Lauritz Sørensen and an electrode for pH measurements was realised in the year 1922 by W.S. Hughes
[2]. Between 1909 and 1922, Griffin and Nelson [3,4] first demonstrated immobilisation of the enzyme invertase
on aluminium hydroxide and charcoal. The first ‘true’ biosensor was developed by Leland C. Clark, Jr in 1956 for
oxygen detection. He is known as the ‘father of biosensors’ and his invention of the oxygen electrode bears his name:
‘Clark electrode’ [5]. The demonstration of an amperometric enzyme electrode for the detection of glucose by Leland
Clark in 1962 was followed by the discovery of the first potentiometric biosensor to detect urea in 1969 by Guilbault
and Montalvo, Jr [6]. Eventually in 1975 the first commercial biosensor was developed by Yellow Spring Instruments
(YSI). Table 1 shows the historical overview of biosensors in the period 1970–1992. Ever since the development of the
i-STAT sensor, remarkable progress has been achieved in the field of biosensors. The field is now a multidisciplinary
area of research that bridges the principles of basic sciences (physics, chemistry and biology) with fundamentals of
micro/nano-technology, electronics and applicatory medicine. The database ‘Web of Science’ has indexed over 84000
reports on the topic of ‘biosensors’ from 2005 to 2015.
Characteristics of a biosensor
There are certain static and dynamic attributes that every biosensor possesses. The optimisation of these properties
is reflected on the performance of the biosensor.
2 c
2016 The Author(s). Published by Portland Press Limited on behalf of the Biochemical Society.

DOI: 10.1042/EBC20150001
Table 1. Important cornerstones in the development of biosensors during the period 1970–1992
1970 Discovery of ion-sensitive ﬁeld-effect transistor (ISFET) by Bergveld [7]
1975 Fibre-optic biosensor for carbon dioxide and oxygen detection by Lubbers and Opitz [8]
1975 First commercial biosensor for glucose detection by YSI [9]
1975 First microbe-based immunosensor by Suzuki et al. [10]
1982 Fibre-optic biosensor for glucose detection by Schultz [11]
1983 Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) immunosensor by Liedberg et al. [12]
1984 First mediated amperometric biosensor: ferrocene used with glucose oxidase for glucose detection [13]
1990 SPR-based biosensor by Pharmacia Biacore [8]
1992 Handheld blood biosensor by i-STAT [8]
Selectivity
Selectivity is perhaps the most important feature of a biosensor. Selectivity is the ability of a bioreceptor to detect a
specific analyte in a sample containing other admixtures and contaminants. The best example of selectivity is depicted
by the interaction of an antigen with the antibody. Classically, antibodies act as bioreceptors and are immobilised on
the surface of the transducer. A solution (usually a buffer containing salts) containing the antigen is then exposed
to the transducer where antibodies interact only with the antigens. To construct a biosensor, selectivity is the main
consideration when choosing bioreceptors.
Reproducibility
Reproducibility is the ability of the biosensor to generate identical responses for a duplicated experimental set-up.
The reproducibility is characterised by the precision and accuracy of the transducer and electronics in a biosensor.
Precision is the ability of the sensor to provide alike results every time a sample is measured and accuracy indicates
the sensor’s capacity to provide a mean value close to the true value when a sample is measured more than once.
Reproducible signals provide high reliability and robustness to the inference made on the response of a biosensor.
Stability
Stability is the degree of susceptibility to ambient disturbances in and around the biosensing system. These distur-
bances can cause a drift in the output signals of a biosensor under measurement. This can cause an error in the meas-
ured concentration and can affect the precision and accuracy of the biosensor. Stability is the most crucial feature in
applications where a biosensor requires long incubation steps or continuous monitoring. The response of transducers
and electronics can be temperature-sensitive, which may influence the stability of a biosensor. Therefore, appropriate
tuning of electronics is required to ensure a stable response of the sensor. Another factor that can influence the sta-
bility is the affinity of the bioreceptor, which is the degree to which the analyte binds to the bioreceptor. Bioreceptors
with high affinities encourage either strong electrostatic bonding or covalent linkage of the analyte that fortifies the
stability of a biosensor. Another factor that affects the stability of a measurement is the degradation of the bioreceptor
over a period of time.
Sensitivity
The minimum amount of analyte that can be detected by a biosensor defines its limit of detection (LOD) or sensi-
tivity. In a number of medical and environmental monitoring applications, a biosensor is required to detect analyte
concentration of as low as ng/ml or even fg/ml to confirm the presence of traces of analytes in a sample. For instance, a
prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration of 4 ng/ml in blood is associated with prostate cancer for which doctors
suggest biopsy tests. Hence, sensitivity is considered to be an important property of a biosensor.
Linearity
Linearity is the attribute that shows the accuracy of the measured response (for a set of measurements with different
concentrations of analyte) to a straight line, mathematically represented as y = mc, where c is the concentration of
c

DOI: 10.1042/EBC20150001
the analyte, y is the output signal, and m is the sensitivity of the biosensor. Linearity of the biosensor can be associated
with the resolution of the biosensor and range of analyte concentrations under test. The resolution of the biosensor
is defined as the smallest change in the concentration of an analyte that is required to bring a change in the response
of the biosensor. Depending on the application, a good resolution is required as most biosensor applications require
not only analyte detection but also measurement of concentrations of analyte over a wide working range. Another
term associated with linearity is linear range, which is defined as the range of analyte concentrations for which the
biosensor response changes linearly with the concentration.
Applications of biosensors
Biosensors have a very wide range of applications that aim to improve the quality of life. This range covers their use for
environmental monitoring, disease detection, food safety, defence, drug discovery and many more. One of the main
applications of biosensors is the detection of biomolecules that are either indicators of a disease or targets of a drug.
For example, electrochemical biosensing techniques can be used as clinical tools to detect protein cancer biomarkers
[14–16]. Biosensors can also be used as platforms for monitoring food traceability, quality, safety and nutritional
value [17,18]. These applications fall into the category of ‘single shot’ analysis tools, i.e. where cost-effective and
disposable sensing platforms are required for the application. On the other hand, an application such as pollution
monitoring [18,19] requires a biosensor to function from a few hours to several days. Such biosensors can be termed
‘long-term monitoring’ analysis tools. Whether it is long-term monitoring or single shot analysis, biosensors find
their use as technologically advanced devices both in resource-limited settings and sophisticated medical set-ups: e.g.
with applications in drug discovery [20–22]; for the detection of a number of chemical and biological agents that are
considered to be toxic materials of defence interest [23]; for use in artificial implantable devices such as pacemakers
[24] and other prosthetic devices [25]; and sewage epidemiology [26]. A range of electrochemical, optical and acoustic
sensing techniques have been utilised, along with their integration into analytical devices for various applications.
Figure 2 indicates different areas of research where biosensors have been used.
Nanotechnology
Irrespective of the field, miniaturisation has always proved to be beneficial for varied reasons. For instance, reducing
the size of the biosensor to the micro- or nano-scale can result in a better signal-to-noise ratio as well as the possibility
of using smaller sample volumes, which means lower assay costs. Moreover, when going towards nanoscale dimen-
sions, the surface-to-volume ratio of the sensing active area increases and the sizes of the detecting electrode and
that of the target biomarker become comparable. This causes both reduced non-specific binding and increased bind-
ing efficiency towards the target molecule. As a result, the bioreceptor becomes an active transducer for the sensing
system and it becomes possible to perform single-molecule detection [27].
An interesting fact in an electrochemical system is that towards nanoscale dimensions the double layer capaci-
tance dramatically decreases because of its dependence on the electrode area. As a result, the extremely low RsCdl
time constant (where Rs is the solution resistance, and Cdl is the double layer capacitance) allows ultra-fast electron-
transfer kinetics and short-life intermediate species can also be investigated. As the time constant decreases, the time
required to accomplish a measurement also diminishes towards the nanosecond domain. Moreover, when Cdl de-
creases dramatically, a further interesting consequence is the possibility of performing measurements in media with
a high solution resistance where normal macroelectrodes are not usable. In fact, by keeping the RsCdl factor constant,
it is possible to perform measurements even without the need of a supporting electrolyte [28].
In terms of nanomaterials, the discovery of graphene and its oxidised form, graphene oxide, opened new frontiers
in biosensors as well as in other research areas. Graphene is a pure form of carbon organised into single atom-thick
sheets. This feature gives graphene exceptional chemical and physical properties.
The integration of graphene, graphene oxide and carbon nanotubes (single or multiple one atom-thick carbon
concentric tubes) as well as nanoparticles and nanowires of different materials are widely reported in the literature for
electrode fabrication. Biosensors so fabricated can nowadays allow limits of detection lower than previously possible,
enabling even single-molecule detection.
4 c

DOI: 10.1042/EBC20150001
Figure 2. Major areas of applications for biosensors
Impact of biosensors
Looking at the never-ending literature related to biosensors over the last few decades, it undoubtedly reveals that
biosensors are attractive not only in academia but also in industry. Biosensor technology exploits the unique prop-
erties of a biological recognition event on a transducing device. In such an event, the interaction of the analyte with
the bioreceptor is converted into a suitable output that is easily readable by the user. This approach not only exploits
the molecular binding event, but also brings researchers from different areas of science and engineering to bridge
their skills. Similar practices have created an immense impact on early-stage researchers in the field of biosensors.
In addition it has opened new frontiers in scientific research where considerable attention has been drawn towards
the development of technologies to benefit different areas including healthcare. Working in an interdisciplinary field
helps to think out of the box and work together with distinct professionals where every idea contributes to make
something substantial. A simple example is a pregnancy test biosensor where researchers from biology highlighted
the biological aspects and co-operated with engineers to work on the electronics of the system for the read-out. Finally,
research from the laboratory is being transferred to customers worldwide because of management professionals. It
would be naı̈ve to think that biosensor research is confined to a niche – this can be seen clearly by the rapid increase in
biosensors available in the market in recent times. Recently, there has been a gradual increase in start-up companies
based on biosensor technology worldwide, which is having a profound impact on the healthcare industrial sector. In
general, it can be said that biosensors have found an important place in our society as they aim to improve the quality
of life in diverse areas such as homeland defence and security, agriculture, food safety, environment, medicine and
pharmacology.
Challenges in biosensing research
Biosensors have been under development for around 50 years and the research in this field has made tremendous
contributions in academia over the last 10 years. However, besides lateral flow pregnancy tests and electrochemical
glucose biosensors, very few biosensors have achieved global commercial success at the retail level. There are sev-
eral factors for this: difficulties in translating academic research into commercially viable prototypes by industry;
complex regulatory issues in clinical applications; and it has not always been trivial to either find researchers with
c

DOI: 10.1042/EBC20150001
a background in biosensor technology or engage researchers from different disciplines of science and engineering
to work together. Another reason is that academic research is driven by propositions of peer review of science, and
funding agencies and politics that are sometimes characterised by various conflicts of interest. It is often a jury of
academics who determine the priorities of funding agencies with legislators who seek considerable warrants for the
funding they approve. If a subject can be made to appear fancy and attractive, it has a better chance of success. In this
aspect, biosensor technology has a certain distinction that has been proficiently sold as a priority. Biosensors should
be aimed as practical devices to be used. Although biosensors employ fundamental sciences, it can hardly be ratio-
nalised as ‘curiosity-driven’ research. On the other hand, research in industry obeys the trend of ‘follow the money’
to some extent. Given the success of commercial glucose sensors, biosensor research is, of course, very lucrative for
the industry’s long-term sustainability. However, it takes quite a long time to produce a commercially viable device
from a proof of concept demonstrated in academia. This also involves a number of risks that industries are reluctant
to face.
As a result there are unaddressed mandatory issues concerning the production of a commercial biosensor, such as:
• Identification of the market that is interested in a biosensor for a specific analyte of interest.
• Clear-cut advantages over existing methods for analyses of that analyte.
• Testing the performance of the biosensor both in use and after storage. Response of a biosensor after 6 months
of storage is the absolute minimum for any practical commercial application.
• Stability, costs and ease of manufacturing each component of the biosensor.
• Hazards and ethics associated with the use of the developed biosensor.
The good news about biosensing technologies is that most of the barriers outlined above are being broken rapidly.
High levels of investment have been poured into translational research worldwide, particularly, for healthcare appli-
cations. This is bringing industry closer to academia in order to provide commercially viable products. On the other
hand, there has been an outstanding improvement in the way scientists work across boundaries. Engineering and
physical scientists nowadays have a much better understanding of basic biomolecular processes, while biochemists
and molecular biologists have greater awareness of the capabilities of different technologies. The alliance of experts
of different disciplines from the onset of biosensing development projects is a very attractive proposition that will
certainly bring advanced and novel products to the market.
Conclusions
In vitro molecular biosensors are nowadays ubiquitous in biomedical diagnosis as well as a wide range of other
areas such as point-of-care monitoring of treatment and disease progression, environmental monitoring, food con-
trol, drug discovery, forensics and biomedical research. Biosensor devices require the interaction of different disci-
plines and rely on very distinct aspects such as the study of interactions of bio-recognition elements with biomolecular
analytes, immobilisation of biomolecules on to solid surfaces, development of anti-fouling surface chemistries, de-
vice design and fabrication, integration of biology with the devices, microfluidics, on-chip electronics, packaging,
sampling techniques, etc.
The rapid development in the field of biosensors over the past decades, both at the research and product devel-
opment level, is due mainly to: (i) developments in miniaturisation and microfabrication technologies; (ii) the use
of novel bio-recognition molecules; (iii) novel nanomaterials and nanostructured devices; and (iv) better interaction
between life scientists and engineering/physical scientists.
A range of target molecules and affinity reagents can be used for a wide range of biosensors. Antibody-based sys-
tems (Chapter 2) represent the gold standard in biosensors. Novel affinity reagents such as synthetic receptors are
currently making way to replace antibodies on biosensors, in particular, aptamers such as peptide aptamers (Chap-
ter 3) and oligonucleotide aptamers (Chapter 4). DNA and oligonucleotide analogues such as peptide nucleic acids
(PNAs) and locked nucleic acids (LNAs) are often used as probe molecules for DNA and microRNA (miRNA) sens-
ing (Chapter 4). Determination of protein glycosylation levels using lectins is currently of great interest in medical
diagnosis (Chapter 5) as is the sensing of toxins in environmental monitoring (Chapter 6). Suitable bioconjugation
strategies and stabilisation of biomolecules on electrodes is essential for the development of commercially viable
biosensors (Chapter 7).
A range of transduction techniques can be used in biosensing devices, including electrochemical sensors (Chap-
ter 8), field-effect transistors (Chapter 9), optical sensors (Chapter 10) and acoustic-sensitive sensors (Chapter 11).
6 c

DOI: 10.1042/EBC20150001
Lateral flow systems (Chapter 12) have great promise for the development of inexpensive and easy to use point-of-
care sensors beyond the traditional pregnancy tests, whereas lab-on-chip devices (Chapter 13) integrate different
microfabrication techniques enabling biosensors to be employed in a wide range of applications using minute sample
volumes and minimum sample preparation.
Summary
• Biosensors are nowadays ubiquitous in different areas of healthcare.
• Pregnancy tests and glucose monitoring sensors are the two main examples of very successful biosensor
devices.
• A range of transduction techniques such as electrochemical, optical and acoustic, can be used for biosensors.
• High-affinity reagents such as antibodies, enzymes and synthetic biomolecules can be coupled to the trans-
ducer in order to provide specificity of the biosensors.
• Nanotechnology has had a major impact on recent advances of biosensing technology.
Funding
We acknowledge funding from the European Commission Framework Programme through the Marie Curie Initial Training Network
PROSENSE [grant number 317420, 2012–2016].
Competing Interests
The Authors declare that there are no competing interests associated with the manuscript.
References
1 Cremer, M. (1906) Über die Ursache der elektromotorischen Eigenschaften der Gewebe, zugleich ein Beitrag zur Lehre von den polyphasischen
Elektrolytketten. Z. Biol. 47, 562–608
2 Hughes, W.S. (1922) The potential difference between glass and electrolytes in contact with the glass. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 44, 2860–2867 CrossRef
3 Griffin, E.G. and Nelson, J.M. (1916) The influence of certain substances on the activity of invertase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 38, 722–730 CrossRef
4 Nelson, J.M. and Griffin, E.G. (1916) Adsorption of invertase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 38, 1109–1115 CrossRef
5 Heineman, W.R. and Jensen, W.B. (2006) Leland C. Clark Jr. (1918–2005). Biosens. Bioelectron. 21, 1403–1404 CrossRef
6 Guilbault, G.G. and Montalvo, Jr, J.G. (1969) Urea-specific enzyme electrode. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 91, 2164–2165 CrossRef PubMed
7 Bergveld, P. (1970) Development of an ion-sensitive solid-state device for neurophysiological measurements. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1 (7),
70–71 CrossRef
8 Vestergaard, M.C., Kerman, K., Hsing, I.M. and Tamiya, E. (eds). (2015) Nanobiosensors and Nanobioanalyses, Springer, Tokyo
9 Yoo, E.H. and Lee, S.Y. (2010) Glucose biosensors: an overview of use in clinical practice. Sensors 10, 4558–4576 CrossRef PubMed
10 Suzuki, S., Takahashi, F., Satoh, I. and Sonobe, N. (1975) Ethanol and lactic acid sensors using electrodes coated with dehydrogenase–collagen
membranes. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 48, 3246–3249 CrossRef
11 Schultz, J.S. (1982) Optical sensor of plasma constituents. U.S. Pat. 4,344,438 A
12 Liedberg, B., Nylander, C. and Lunström, I. (1983) Surface plasmon resonance for gas detection and biosensing. Sens. Actuators 4, 299–304 CrossRef
13 Cass, A.E., Davis, G., Francis, G.D., Hill, H.A.O., Aston, W.J., Higgins, I.J. et al. (1984) Ferrocene-mediated enzyme electrode for amperometric
determination of glucose. Anal. Chem. 56, 667–671 CrossRef PubMed
14 Jolly, P., Formisano, N. and Estrela, P. (2015) DNA aptamer-based detection of prostate cancer. Chem. Pap. 69, 77–89 CrossRef
15 Jolly, P., Formisano, N., Tkáč, J., Kasák, P., Frost, C.G. and Estrela, P. (2015) Label-free impedimetric aptasensor with antifouling surface chemistry: a
prostate specific antigen case study. Sens. Actuators B 209, 306–312 CrossRef
16 Formisano, N., Jolly, P., Bhalla, N., Cromhout, M., Flanagan, S.P. and Fogel, R. et al. (2015) Optimisation of an electrochemical impedance spectroscopy
aptasensor by exploiting quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation signals. Sens. Actuators B 220, 369–375 CrossRef
17 Sharma, T.K., Ramanathan, R., Rakwal, R., Agrawal, G.K. and Bansal, V. (2015) Moving forward in plant food safety and security through
nanobiosensors: adopt or adapt biomedical technologies? Proteomics 15, 1680–1692 CrossRef PubMed
18 Van Dorst, B., Mehta, J., Bekaert, K., Rouah-Martin, E., De Coen, W., Dubruel, P. et al. (2010) Recent advances in recognition elements of food and
environmental biosensors: a review. Biosens. Bioelectron. 26, 1178–1194 CrossRef PubMed
c

DOI: 10.1042/EBC20150001
19 Gavrilescu, M., Demnerová, K., Aamand, J., Agathos, S. and Fava, F. (2015) Emerging pollutants in the environment: present and future challenges in
biomonitoring, ecological risks and bioremediation. N. Biotechnol. 32, 147–156 CrossRef
20 Bhalla, N., Di Lorenzo, M., Pula, G. and Estrela, P. (2014) Protein phosphorylation analysis based on proton release detection: potential tools for drug
discovery. Biosens. Bioelectron. 54, 109–114 CrossRef PubMed
21 Bhalla, N., Di Lorenzo, M., Pula, G. and Estrela, P. (2015) Protein phosphorylation detection using dual-mode ﬁeld-effect devices and nanoplasmonic
sensors. Sci. Rep. 5, 8687 CrossRef PubMed
22 Bhalla, N., Formisano, N., Miodek, A., Jain, A., Di Lorenzo, M., Pula, G. et al. (2015) Plasmonic ruler on ﬁeld-effect devices for kinase drug discovery
applications. Biosens. Bioelectron. 71, 121–128 CrossRef PubMed
23 Paddle, B.M. (1996) Biosensors for chemical and biological agents of defence interest. Biosens. Bioelectron. 11, 1079–1113 CrossRef PubMed
24 Grayson, A.C.R., Shawgo, R.S., Johnson, A.M., Flynn, N.T., Li, Y., Cima, M.J. et al. (2004) A BioMEMS review: MEMS technology for physiologically
integrated devices. Proc. IEEE 92, 6–21 CrossRef
25 Parker, K.K. and O’Grady, M. (2015) Porous electroactive hydrogels and uses thereof. U.S. Pat. 8,999,378 B2.
26 Yang, Z., Kasprzyk-Hordern, B., Frost, C.G., Estrela, P. and Thomas, K.V. (2015) Community sewage sensors for monitoring public health. Environ. Sci.
Technol. 49, 5845–5846 CrossRef PubMed
27 Adams, K.L., Puchades, M. and Ewing, A.G. (2008) In vitro electrochemistry of biological systems. Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. (Palo Alto Calif.) 1,
329–355 CrossRef
28 Zhang, Y., Zhang, B. and White, H.S. (2006) Electrochemistry of nanopore electrodes in low ionic strength solutions. J. Phys. Chem. B 110,
1768–1774 CrossRef PubMed
8 c

Introduction to biosensors

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Similar to Introduction to biosensors (20)

More from Amjad Khan Afridi (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Introduction to biosensors