SlideShare a Scribd company logo
2
Most read
3
Most read
Consistent (re)implementation of IRB & IFRS 9 credit risk
models
Date: 15 October 2020
By: Kristi Rohtsalu
By the time of preparing for the IFRS 9 adoption on 1 January 2018, the so-called IRB banks had already
in place IRB models for the calculation of regulatory capital requirements for credit risk (in accordance
with CRR). Many other banks aiming for the IRB had internal rating systems very similar to the IRB banks.
Hence, IFRS 9 parameters and expected credit loss estimates have been derived from the IRB parameters
by using various adjustments (e.g.: removal of margins of conservatism, transforming TTC and downturn
estimates to PIT estimates). This has caused unnecessary complexities in the IFRS 9 models as well as
inconsistencies between the IRB and IFRS 9 parameters. Taking a blank sheet of paper and imagining
developing models for both purposes – regulatory capital (IRB) and credit impairment losses (IFRS 9) –
from scratch enables a more holistic, more consistent and more efficient way of credit risk modelling.
The figure below (refer to the next page) illustrates that both IRB and IFRS 9 models have the same
basement (data, rank-ordering models, calibration model and long-run average estimates). Only at the
very stage of risk quantification for the different types of risk estimates (PIT, TTC, downturn) there is a
branching into the calculation of the IRB parameters and the IFRS 9 parameters:
• Concerning IRB parameters, the RWA formula for the calculation of regulatory capital assumes 12-
month through-the-cycle (TTC) PD estimates, and downturn estimates for LGD and CF. Further, a
margin of conservatism is added to the best estimate risk parameter values for the possible estimation
errors.
• IFRS 9 parameters, on the other hand, are point-in-time (PIT) estimates, reflecting best estimate
predictions for the future (most often, weighted for the base, optimistic and pessimistic scenarios);
no margins of conservatism should be added. In addition to the 12-month estimates, there is the ECL
modelling part that involves transforming 12-month estimates into the lifetime estimates, given the
defined IFRS 9 scenarios.
Importantly, the calibration model or approach is ought to be such that it enables deriving all types of
risk estimates just by entering different inputs and/or assumptions to the algorithm: point-in-time
(weighted by the defined scenario projections as necessary), through-the-cycle and downturn.
As for the use of risk parameters in risk management, in capital allocation etc., rank-ordering models
should be preserved to meet the IRB requirements – and for the sake of model consistency as well. The
type of risk estimate (PIT, TTC, downturn) chosen for a given purpose depends on the specific use cases.
To summarise, my recommendation to the banks ‘sitting’ on the outdated credit risk models, built layer-
upon-layer, is to take that blank sheet of paper and reimagine the current implementations of the IRB and
IFRS 9 models for the sake of consistency and for efficiency gains in credit risk modelling area, going
forward. True, regulatory frameworks and the international financial reporting standard are still not fully
aligned, yet the discrepancies between the two could be viewed as non-essential.
Figure 1 – Holistic view to IRB and IFRS 9 credit risk modelling
DATA FOR MODEL DEVELOPMENT AND CALIBRATION
Internal data
- Obligor data
- Facility data
- Collateral data
- Cash flow data
- Forbearance, default, …
- Workout costs
- …
Credit data
- Payment defaults
- ‘Positive registry’ of all
obligor’s credits
- ECAI ratings
- …
Macro & market data
- GDP & GDP by industry
sector
- Unemployment rate
- Real estate prices
- Key interest rates
- …
Misc. data sources
- Business registry
- Open Data shared by the
customer
- …
MODEL DEVELOPMENT: RISK DIFFERENTIATION / RANK-ORDERING
PD
models
CF
models
LGD
models
IRB MODELLING IFRS 9 MODELLING
LIFETIME PARAMETERS & ECL MODELLING
MODEL CALIBRATION: RISK QUANTIFICATION
Through-the-Cycle (TTC) PD
Downturn LGD & LGD in default
Point-in-Time (PIT) PD / CF / LGD /
ECL = ELBE
Calibration model
Long-run average best estimate 12-month risk parameter values: PD, CF, LGD & LGD in default
MARGIN OF CONSERVATISM (MoC)
N/A
(Best estimate parameters, no margins of conservatism
applied)
MoC for:
a) deficiencies in data and methodologies
b) changes in underwriting standards, risk appetite,
collection and recovery policies, etc.
c) general estimation error
d) issues in the assignment of risk parameters
PDLife; ECLLifeN/A
Appendix. Abbreviations
CF – (Credit) Conversion Factor
CRR – Capital Requirements Regulation (in the European Union)
PD – (12 month) Probability of Default
PDLife – Lifetime Probability of Default (in the context of IFRS 9)
ECAI – External Credit Assessment Institutions
ECL – 12-month Expected Credit Loss (IFRS 9 term)
ECLLife – Lifetime Expected Credit Loss (in the context of IFRS 9)
EL – Expected Loss (CRR term)
ELBE – Expected Loss Best Estimate (CRR term, can be approximated to the ECL in IFRS 9 terms)
GDP – Gross Domestic Product
LGD – Loss Given Default
IFRS 9 – Internal Financial Reporting Standard #9
IRB – Internal Ratings-based approach (CRR term)
MoC – Margin of Conservatism
N/A – Not Applicable
PIT – Point-in-Time
RWA – Risk-Weighted Assets (for credit risk, in CRR terms)
TTC – Through-the-Cycle

More Related Content

PDF
10 enterprise risk management telkom 2011 early warning system
PDF
Economic capital Management Experience Sharing
PPTX
Counterparty credit risk. general review
PDF
Toward Credit Portfolio Management
PDF
18.2 internal ratings based approach
PPTX
How to Install BMW E46 M3 Navigation DVD Player GPS System
PPT
Credit risk models
PDF
Rma May22 Stress Testing In The Context Of Icaap
10 enterprise risk management telkom 2011 early warning system
Economic capital Management Experience Sharing
Counterparty credit risk. general review
Toward Credit Portfolio Management
18.2 internal ratings based approach
How to Install BMW E46 M3 Navigation DVD Player GPS System
Credit risk models
Rma May22 Stress Testing In The Context Of Icaap

What's hot (20)

PPTX
A Tale of Two Risk Measures: Economic Capital vs. Stress Testing and a Call f...
PPTX
PPT
Risk management in financial institution
PPT
Analyzing a commercial real estate investment
PPT
Credit risk
PDF
Cross Currency Swaps - An Introduction
PPT
Chapter 12_The Mortgage Markets
PDF
Eric on economic capital modeling
PDF
Risk Appetite: A new Menu under Basel 3? Pieter Klaassen (UBS) voor het Zande...
PPT
ICAAP - INDIAN BANKS
PPTX
Capital market - sample presentation
PPTX
Social Media Marketing Strategies in 2025.pptx
PDF
Managerial Economics 7th Edition Samuelson Solutions Manual
PPTX
FRTB Backtesting and P&L Attribution Test Requirements
PPT
Slide 2c intangible assets ifrs
PPTX
FRTB CVA Capital Charge
PPTX
FRTB Technology Considerations
PPT
Duration model
PPTX
Cost Of Capital
PPTX
Sertifikasi SNI/ISO 27001- British Standard Institute
A Tale of Two Risk Measures: Economic Capital vs. Stress Testing and a Call f...
Risk management in financial institution
Analyzing a commercial real estate investment
Credit risk
Cross Currency Swaps - An Introduction
Chapter 12_The Mortgage Markets
Eric on economic capital modeling
Risk Appetite: A new Menu under Basel 3? Pieter Klaassen (UBS) voor het Zande...
ICAAP - INDIAN BANKS
Capital market - sample presentation
Social Media Marketing Strategies in 2025.pptx
Managerial Economics 7th Edition Samuelson Solutions Manual
FRTB Backtesting and P&L Attribution Test Requirements
Slide 2c intangible assets ifrs
FRTB CVA Capital Charge
FRTB Technology Considerations
Duration model
Cost Of Capital
Sertifikasi SNI/ISO 27001- British Standard Institute
Ad

Similar to IRB and IFRS 9 credit risk models - consistent (re)implementation (20)

PDF
ZRE_GChawla_Toronto_GCD_Dec2016
PDF
A best practice framework to determine Forward PDs for application in IFRS 9 ...
PDF
Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB) – Data Challenges
PDF
EAD Parameter : A stochastic way to model the Credit Conversion Factor
PDF
Article cem into sa-ccr
PDF
Counterparty Credit RISK | Evolution of standardised approach
PDF
Cash Shortfall & LGD - Two Sides of the Same Coin
PDF
IFRS9 white paper - Credit Today and HML
PDF
PDF
From IAS 39 to IFRS9
PDF
Building Blocks of IFRS 9 Impairment Modeling
PDF
Market Practice Series (Credit Losses Modeling)
PDF
Blog 2016 13 - impairment modeling in retail - many moving parts
PPT
Basel from a Business Perspective
PDF
SMA | Comments on BCBS (June 2016) consultation (Standardized Measurement App...
PPT
Evaluation of Capital Needs in Insurance
PPTX
RWA Credit Risk Floors
PDF
5618 ZRE_WP_Cond_Uncond_6
PPTX
Current Write-off Rates and Q-factors in Roll-rate Method
PDF
Be aers-fara-modellinginsolvency-nov2010
ZRE_GChawla_Toronto_GCD_Dec2016
A best practice framework to determine Forward PDs for application in IFRS 9 ...
Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB) – Data Challenges
EAD Parameter : A stochastic way to model the Credit Conversion Factor
Article cem into sa-ccr
Counterparty Credit RISK | Evolution of standardised approach
Cash Shortfall & LGD - Two Sides of the Same Coin
IFRS9 white paper - Credit Today and HML
From IAS 39 to IFRS9
Building Blocks of IFRS 9 Impairment Modeling
Market Practice Series (Credit Losses Modeling)
Blog 2016 13 - impairment modeling in retail - many moving parts
Basel from a Business Perspective
SMA | Comments on BCBS (June 2016) consultation (Standardized Measurement App...
Evaluation of Capital Needs in Insurance
RWA Credit Risk Floors
5618 ZRE_WP_Cond_Uncond_6
Current Write-off Rates and Q-factors in Roll-rate Method
Be aers-fara-modellinginsolvency-nov2010
Ad

More from Kristi Rohtsalu (20)

PDF
Innovatsioonifestival 2025 - Murrangulised tehnoloogiad
PDF
Kevadine põgenemine Itaaliasse: Veneetsia, Verona ja Garda järv (aprill 2025)
PDF
FICO Nordics Forum 2024: Transforming Credit Decision Processes & Fraud Preve...
PDF
Noppeid enesearengufestivalilt "Õnnelik mina"
PDF
Noppeid InvesteerimisFestivalilt 2024 Toosikannul
PDF
Innovatsioonifestival 2024 - Tehisintellekt ühiskonna teenistuses
PDF
Risk Management in Banks - Overview (May 2024)
PDF
Patagooniat avastamas, veebruar-märts 2024
PDF
Patagoonia avastamise retk veebruaris-märtsis 2024
PDF
Notes from AltFi Lending Summit 2023
PDF
My 2023 Summer Tripping in Georgia
PPTX
50 pilti minu Gruusia suvest 2023
PDF
Minu Bali Reisi Päevikud (Veebruar-Märts 2023)
PDF
Notes from AltFi Lending Summit 2022
PDF
Rännates Alpides ja vahemerelises Euroopas suvel 2022
PDF
Notes from AltFi Festival of Finance 2022 in London
PDF
Winter Office in Gran Canaria
PDF
Tallataksoga Lõuna-Saksamaa, otsaga Austrias – reisipäevikuid suvest 2021
PDF
The AltFi Festival of Finance 2020 - Notes
PDF
My First Trip to Norway - Summer 2020
Innovatsioonifestival 2025 - Murrangulised tehnoloogiad
Kevadine põgenemine Itaaliasse: Veneetsia, Verona ja Garda järv (aprill 2025)
FICO Nordics Forum 2024: Transforming Credit Decision Processes & Fraud Preve...
Noppeid enesearengufestivalilt "Õnnelik mina"
Noppeid InvesteerimisFestivalilt 2024 Toosikannul
Innovatsioonifestival 2024 - Tehisintellekt ühiskonna teenistuses
Risk Management in Banks - Overview (May 2024)
Patagooniat avastamas, veebruar-märts 2024
Patagoonia avastamise retk veebruaris-märtsis 2024
Notes from AltFi Lending Summit 2023
My 2023 Summer Tripping in Georgia
50 pilti minu Gruusia suvest 2023
Minu Bali Reisi Päevikud (Veebruar-Märts 2023)
Notes from AltFi Lending Summit 2022
Rännates Alpides ja vahemerelises Euroopas suvel 2022
Notes from AltFi Festival of Finance 2022 in London
Winter Office in Gran Canaria
Tallataksoga Lõuna-Saksamaa, otsaga Austrias – reisipäevikuid suvest 2021
The AltFi Festival of Finance 2020 - Notes
My First Trip to Norway - Summer 2020

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
Galatica Smart Energy Infrastructure Startup Pitch Deck
PDF
Lecture1 pattern recognition............
PPTX
climate analysis of Dhaka ,Banglades.pptx
PPTX
Database Infoormation System (DBIS).pptx
PDF
.pdf is not working space design for the following data for the following dat...
PDF
BF and FI - Blockchain, fintech and Financial Innovation Lesson 2.pdf
PDF
Data Engineering Interview Questions & Answers Cloud Data Stacks (AWS, Azure,...
PPTX
Introduction to Firewall Analytics - Interfirewall and Transfirewall.pptx
PPTX
Microsoft-Fabric-Unifying-Analytics-for-the-Modern-Enterprise Solution.pptx
PDF
Business Analytics and business intelligence.pdf
PPTX
Computer network topology notes for revision
PDF
Clinical guidelines as a resource for EBP(1).pdf
PDF
Mega Projects Data Mega Projects Data
PPTX
Managing Community Partner Relationships
PDF
168300704-gasification-ppt.pdfhghhhsjsjhsuxush
PPTX
Introduction to Basics of Ethical Hacking and Penetration Testing -Unit No. 1...
PDF
annual-report-2024-2025 original latest.
PPTX
Acceptance and paychological effects of mandatory extra coach I classes.pptx
PPT
Quality review (1)_presentation of this 21
Galatica Smart Energy Infrastructure Startup Pitch Deck
Lecture1 pattern recognition............
climate analysis of Dhaka ,Banglades.pptx
Database Infoormation System (DBIS).pptx
.pdf is not working space design for the following data for the following dat...
BF and FI - Blockchain, fintech and Financial Innovation Lesson 2.pdf
Data Engineering Interview Questions & Answers Cloud Data Stacks (AWS, Azure,...
Introduction to Firewall Analytics - Interfirewall and Transfirewall.pptx
Microsoft-Fabric-Unifying-Analytics-for-the-Modern-Enterprise Solution.pptx
Business Analytics and business intelligence.pdf
Computer network topology notes for revision
Clinical guidelines as a resource for EBP(1).pdf
Mega Projects Data Mega Projects Data
Managing Community Partner Relationships
168300704-gasification-ppt.pdfhghhhsjsjhsuxush
Introduction to Basics of Ethical Hacking and Penetration Testing -Unit No. 1...
annual-report-2024-2025 original latest.
Acceptance and paychological effects of mandatory extra coach I classes.pptx
Quality review (1)_presentation of this 21

IRB and IFRS 9 credit risk models - consistent (re)implementation

  • 1. Consistent (re)implementation of IRB & IFRS 9 credit risk models Date: 15 October 2020 By: Kristi Rohtsalu By the time of preparing for the IFRS 9 adoption on 1 January 2018, the so-called IRB banks had already in place IRB models for the calculation of regulatory capital requirements for credit risk (in accordance with CRR). Many other banks aiming for the IRB had internal rating systems very similar to the IRB banks. Hence, IFRS 9 parameters and expected credit loss estimates have been derived from the IRB parameters by using various adjustments (e.g.: removal of margins of conservatism, transforming TTC and downturn estimates to PIT estimates). This has caused unnecessary complexities in the IFRS 9 models as well as inconsistencies between the IRB and IFRS 9 parameters. Taking a blank sheet of paper and imagining developing models for both purposes – regulatory capital (IRB) and credit impairment losses (IFRS 9) – from scratch enables a more holistic, more consistent and more efficient way of credit risk modelling. The figure below (refer to the next page) illustrates that both IRB and IFRS 9 models have the same basement (data, rank-ordering models, calibration model and long-run average estimates). Only at the very stage of risk quantification for the different types of risk estimates (PIT, TTC, downturn) there is a branching into the calculation of the IRB parameters and the IFRS 9 parameters: • Concerning IRB parameters, the RWA formula for the calculation of regulatory capital assumes 12- month through-the-cycle (TTC) PD estimates, and downturn estimates for LGD and CF. Further, a margin of conservatism is added to the best estimate risk parameter values for the possible estimation errors. • IFRS 9 parameters, on the other hand, are point-in-time (PIT) estimates, reflecting best estimate predictions for the future (most often, weighted for the base, optimistic and pessimistic scenarios); no margins of conservatism should be added. In addition to the 12-month estimates, there is the ECL modelling part that involves transforming 12-month estimates into the lifetime estimates, given the defined IFRS 9 scenarios. Importantly, the calibration model or approach is ought to be such that it enables deriving all types of risk estimates just by entering different inputs and/or assumptions to the algorithm: point-in-time (weighted by the defined scenario projections as necessary), through-the-cycle and downturn. As for the use of risk parameters in risk management, in capital allocation etc., rank-ordering models should be preserved to meet the IRB requirements – and for the sake of model consistency as well. The type of risk estimate (PIT, TTC, downturn) chosen for a given purpose depends on the specific use cases. To summarise, my recommendation to the banks ‘sitting’ on the outdated credit risk models, built layer- upon-layer, is to take that blank sheet of paper and reimagine the current implementations of the IRB and IFRS 9 models for the sake of consistency and for efficiency gains in credit risk modelling area, going forward. True, regulatory frameworks and the international financial reporting standard are still not fully aligned, yet the discrepancies between the two could be viewed as non-essential.
  • 2. Figure 1 – Holistic view to IRB and IFRS 9 credit risk modelling DATA FOR MODEL DEVELOPMENT AND CALIBRATION Internal data - Obligor data - Facility data - Collateral data - Cash flow data - Forbearance, default, … - Workout costs - … Credit data - Payment defaults - ‘Positive registry’ of all obligor’s credits - ECAI ratings - … Macro & market data - GDP & GDP by industry sector - Unemployment rate - Real estate prices - Key interest rates - … Misc. data sources - Business registry - Open Data shared by the customer - … MODEL DEVELOPMENT: RISK DIFFERENTIATION / RANK-ORDERING PD models CF models LGD models IRB MODELLING IFRS 9 MODELLING LIFETIME PARAMETERS & ECL MODELLING MODEL CALIBRATION: RISK QUANTIFICATION Through-the-Cycle (TTC) PD Downturn LGD & LGD in default Point-in-Time (PIT) PD / CF / LGD / ECL = ELBE Calibration model Long-run average best estimate 12-month risk parameter values: PD, CF, LGD & LGD in default MARGIN OF CONSERVATISM (MoC) N/A (Best estimate parameters, no margins of conservatism applied) MoC for: a) deficiencies in data and methodologies b) changes in underwriting standards, risk appetite, collection and recovery policies, etc. c) general estimation error d) issues in the assignment of risk parameters PDLife; ECLLifeN/A
  • 3. Appendix. Abbreviations CF – (Credit) Conversion Factor CRR – Capital Requirements Regulation (in the European Union) PD – (12 month) Probability of Default PDLife – Lifetime Probability of Default (in the context of IFRS 9) ECAI – External Credit Assessment Institutions ECL – 12-month Expected Credit Loss (IFRS 9 term) ECLLife – Lifetime Expected Credit Loss (in the context of IFRS 9) EL – Expected Loss (CRR term) ELBE – Expected Loss Best Estimate (CRR term, can be approximated to the ECL in IFRS 9 terms) GDP – Gross Domestic Product LGD – Loss Given Default IFRS 9 – Internal Financial Reporting Standard #9 IRB – Internal Ratings-based approach (CRR term) MoC – Margin of Conservatism N/A – Not Applicable PIT – Point-in-Time RWA – Risk-Weighted Assets (for credit risk, in CRR terms) TTC – Through-the-Cycle