IRJET- Comparative Study of different Position of Shear Wall using Software

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 06 Issue: 03 | Mar 2019 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
© 2019, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.211 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 4853
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DIFFERENT POSITION OF SHEAR WALL
USING SOFTWARE
Mukund kapadia1, Ankit mistry2, Bhargav gohil3, Ashwin sutaria4, Bhavin godhani5,
Guide Prof. Kevan DC
1,2,3,4,5Student, Department of civil Engineering, MSCET, Surat, Gujarat, India
6Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, MSCET, Surat, Gujarat, India
---------------------------------------------------------------------***---------------------------------------------------------------------
Abstract – A India is earthquake prone country. Hence, the
structures responseisconsideringunder windandseismicload
effect are very important. The effect seismic force and wind
force is very important for design the height of buildings.
Therefore, it is necessity to consider effects of lateral loads
produce due to earthquakes and wind. The structural is a
residential multi storey building. The typical structure design
is assembly between the footing, columns, beams and slabs.
The present project consists the analysis of a multi-storey
residential building of G+13 have 4 flat sat each storey. The
different structural loadings are calculating, obtained as per
Indian standard to applied and the design for beams and
columns. The structure model without RCC shear wall and
same model with RCC shear wall and the effect due to change
in position of RCC shear wall is consider, analysis and
comparative study has been carriedout. SoftwareSTAAD PRO
V8Iis used for the analysis. The result such asfordifferentload
are studied. Comparison done for models carrying RCC shear
walls at different position tochoose best design for wind load,
earthquake load, live load, and dead load to reduce the
damage and increase performance.
Key Words: STAAD PRO V8I, Shear wall, RCC, Axialforce,
Bending
1. INTRODUCTION
The shear wall is structural vertical member that is able to
withstand against combination of axial force, shear and
moment load produce through applied lateral and gravity
load from other member in structure. RCC shear walls are
most commonly provide in high-risemulti-storybuildingsto
achieve better reduction in bending moment and shear
failure. Shear wall is like vertical rigid diaphragm plate that
capable to transfer horizontal load.Thiswall generallystarts
at foundation level and are continuous through the building
height. Shear wall has adequate strength and stiffness to
control lateral displacements. The shear wall is composition
of large and wide RCC columns. Thickness can be as low as
150 mm, or as high as 400 mm in high rise buildings. Shear
wall may become imperative from the point of view of
economy and control of lateral deflection. InRCmulti-storey
building well shape and plan position of the shear wall
consider in the behavior of the structure. The best position
for the shear walls is in the center of each half of the
building. Center of mass and building stiffness isconsidering
for a Structure.
2. METHODOLOGY
For Modeling and analysis of structure the” STAADPROV8I”
has been used. It is based on finite element method. The
planning is done using AUTOCAD. The space frame G+13
model is prepared. Column base are assigned as fixed
support. Column and beam are assigned and shear wall
assigned as plate element.
Building having a RCC shear wall throughout the height of
building. Details of multistory frame building are: G+13
storey, Floor to floor height: 3 m Seismic zone: Zone
IV(Surat), Soil type: soft soil. Shear wall: 230 mm thick and
RCC slab: 150 mm thick and load cases used for analysis.
For RCC design Concrete grade: M30 and All steel grades:
Fe415.
3. LOAD CASES
Dead load = Self-weight of structural elements
Live load (IS875:1987)
1. rooms and kitchen = 2kn/m2
2. corridors, passages, staircases, fire escapes, store
rooms and balconies for residential = 3kn/m2
Wind load (IS875:1987)
1. Building Height: 42 m
2. Building Length {L}: 26.62m
3. Building width {B}: 17.8689m
4. Building Classification Category: category 2
5. basic Wind Speed: 44 m/sec
6. Exposure category: exposure B
7. Wind Speed-up over Hills or Escarpment? – NO

Earthquake load (IS1893:2002)
1. Zone = 0.16
2. Respond reduction = 4(SMRF)
3. Soil type = soft soil
4. Structure type = RC frame type
5. Damping ratio = 5%
6. Earthquake load in = x & y direction
3. MATERIAL PROPERTIES
Density of materials used:
MATERIAL: DENSITY
I. Plain concrete 24.0KN/m3
II. Reinforced 25.0KN/m3
III. Flooring material 20.0KN/m3
IV. Brick masonry 22.0KN/m3
V. Grade of concrete M25
VI. Grade of reinforcing steel Fe 415
VII. Modulus of Elasticity for Steel 210KN/m2
Fig 1 Plan A (AutoCAD plan)
Fig 2 Plan b (AutoCAD plan)
Fig 3 Plan C (AutoCAD plan)
Fig 4 Plan D (AutoCAD plan)

4. RESULT
Chart -1: shear wall earthquake load +x
Chart -2: shear wall earthquake load +Z
Chart -3: shear wall wind load +Z
Chart -4: shear wall wind load +X
Chart -5: shear wall live load
Chart -6: shear wall earthquake load +Z

Chart -7: dead load
Chart -8: bending moment for EQ load
Chart -9: bending moment for wind load
Chart -10: Axial force for EQ load
5. CONCLUSIONS
 The building with shear wall has more
earthquake resistance compared to building
without shear wall.
 There is no variation on wind effect for with and
without shear wall building.
 There is small variation on bending moment and
axial force for with and without shear wall.
 The node displacements are more for Zone V
 compared to Zone III for earth quake load.
 The Axial forces are decreased with increasing
structural height for all models. From above
analysis, it is observed that in G+13 Storey building,
constructing building with shear wall at corner
(Model C) location gives minimum drift and
minimum displacement.
 From all the above analysis and design, it is
observed that in G+13 Story building, constructing
building with shear wall at center (Model C) is
economical as compared with shear wall structure
(Model D).
 Size of members like column can be reduced
economically in case of structure with shear wall as
compared to the same structure withoutshearwall.
 Variation in column size at different floors in Model
1 affects the storey drift while in case of Model 3 it
does not affect the storey drift due to the presence
of shear wall.
 More carpet area will be available in the building as
the sizes of columns are reduced when shear wall is
provided.

 Less obstruction will be there because of reduced
size of column and provision of shear wall.
 As per analysis, it is concluded that
displacement at different level in multistoried
building with shear wall is comparatively lesser as
compared to R.C.C. building Without Shear Wall.
6. REFERENCES
[1] Professor, Anirudhha Banhatti,“EarthquakeBehaviorof
RCC Building for Various Shear Wall Configurations”
IRJET e-ISSN: 2395-0056
[2] Ashish S. Agrawal and S.D. Charkha, “Study of
Optimizing Configuration of Multi-Storey Building
Subjected to Lateral Loads by Changing Shear Wall
Location" proceedings of international conference on
advances in architecture and civil engineering (aarcv
2012), 21st – 23rd june 2012 287 paper id sam137, vol.
1
[3] Dr. P.S. Pajgade, “Design of Multistoried R.C.C. Buildings
with and without Shear Walls”, July, 2014, ISSN: 2277-
9655
[4] Anshuman. S, Dipendu Bhunia, Bhavin Ramjiyani,
“Solution of Shear Wall Location in Multi-Storey
Building” international journal of civil and structural
engineering, volume 2, 2011
[5] Bimala Pillai, Prof. Priyabrata Guha,“Comparison
between RCC and steel structure with wind and
earthquake effect using Staad pro”, IJAR 2015; 1(6): 28-
33,

IRJET- Comparative Study of different Position of Shear Wall using Software

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Similar to IRJET- Comparative Study of different Position of Shear Wall using Software (20)

More from IRJET Journal (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

IRJET- Comparative Study of different Position of Shear Wall using Software