IRJET- Performance Evaluation of Irrigation Projects

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 06 Issue: 09 | Sep 2019 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
© 2019, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.34 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 1675
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF IRRIGATION PROJECTS
REETA JOSHI, Dr ROHIT BHATI, JAGDISH KANDPAL
1Reeta joshi, Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Quantum University, Uttarakhand, India
2Dr Rohit Bhati , Assistant Professor, Dept. of Agricultural Studies, Quantum university, Uttarakhand, India
3Jagdish kandpal, Assistant Professor Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Rit Roorkee, Uttarakhand, India
---------------------------------------------------------------------***----------------------------------------------------------------------
Abstract - Performance evaluation irrigation projects is
aimed to look in to water use efficiency resources
sustainability for economic escalations ,social equity and
environmental sustainability modern technology such as
remote sensing and GIS helps in data collectionandanalysisof
on going projects .performance evaluation leads to
benchmarking of the system this in turns helps in analyzing
the projects comparing itsperformanceofaprojectsand many
projects comparing its performance of a projects and many
projects across various agro climatic zones this paper
highlights the basic concept of performance evaluation
benchmarking, benchmarking procedures and lesson learned
from some studies conducted in the northern India.
Key Words: Projects,Benchmarking, Performance,Many,
Comparing
1. INTRODUCTION
India is blessed with many precious natural resources ,
water resource being one of them .water resources is
however unevenly distributed in time and space .Therefore
,water resources structure have been conceived since the
beginning of the civilization to harness this for the well-
being of the human civilization. Prior toindependencewater
resources of same of the river basin in India were harnessed
by diverting river water through weirs/ barrages for
irrigation purpose but this was not sufficient to feed the
growing population of the country .therefore, a large no of
major medium and minor irrigation projects were
undertaken in various five year plans resulting into self-
sufficiency in food grain by way of green revolution in the
country. total irrigation potential created by all sources in
the country prior to independence was about 22.6 million
hectors .this has been increased to about 97.00 million
hectors utilization of this potential being to thetuneof82.30
million hectors .However it has been seen that most of the
projects in operation are not performing as per the targets
conceived at the planning stage .Hence it is considered
essential to evaluate the performance of irrigation projects
in operation.
In addition to performance evaluation of a particular
projects, it is also felt to compare it with the performance of
another projects in the same agro-climatic region .This
concept is termed as benchmarking of irrigation system
.Although thisactivityconcerning benchmarkinginirrigation
system started since 2002.since then seven regional
workshops have been carried out
The concept of benchmarking in irrigation systems
and various indicatorsconsideredforthispurposevis-à-vis
evaluation of irrigation projects are discussedinthispaper
as followed:
1.0 PERFORMANCE EVALUTION STUDIES:
Performance evaluation studies may be carried out with the
following objectives:
1. Measurement of gaps between set target
and achievements
2. Identify reasons for shortfalls andremedial
measures
3. Assessment of impacts on environment
4. Selection of best practices and processes
5. Rectification of assumptions
6. Assessment ofperformance withrespectsto
set objectives
7. Identification of shortfalls
8. Impacts on agro-economic and socio-
economic status of command
9. Irrigation induced land degredation such as
water logging alkanity and salinity effects
land
10. Recommendations for closing performance
gaps and improving overall effenciency of
the system
1.2 ASPECTS OF PERFORMANCE STUDIES
Performance evaluation of irrigationprojectsmaybecarried
out considering 2 level performance parameters tabulated
in table1
S.NO LEVEL 1 S.NO LEVEL2
1 System
performance
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
Physical
achievement
Hydrology
Distribution
network
Command area
development
Irrigation
efficiency
Competing
demand
Conjunctive use
of SW and GW
Drought

mitigation
Management
issues
2 Agro Economic
Impacts
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
2.10
Changes in
cropping
pattern
Land use land
distribution
Land holding
Agro based
industries
Extension
services
Micro land
credit facilities
Farming
practices
Ancillary land
credit facilities
Ancillary
income
generation
sources
Rotational
water
management
3 Socio-economic
impact
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
Farm
employment
Non-farm
employment
Infrastructure
and
institutional
facilities
Demographic
impact
Literacy
Health care and
family planning
Poverty
alleviation
4 Environmental
impact
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.7
4.8
Ground water
level
water quality
ecology
wild life
Drainage and
water logging
Soil salinity and
alkalinity
Forest and land
use
Flora and fauna
2. SUGGESTION BASED ON PERFORMANCEEVALUATION
STUDIES:
Performance evaluation studies of major and medium
irrigation projectssuggestfollowingmeasuresforoptimizing
the benefits from these projects
1. Rehabilitation and restoration of damaged , silted
canal system
2. Adequate maintenance of system
3. Selective lining of canal system
4. Realistic and scientific operation of system
5. Revision of cropping pattern
6. Restoration and provision of appropriate control
structure
7. Efficient and reliable communication network
8. Adequate water measuring system
9. Conjunctive use of ground and surface water
10. Regular revision of water rate
11. Encouragement for formation of water users
associations
12. Setting up farmers water school
13. Setting up micro-credit facilities
14. Setting up agricultural extension services
15. Encouragement to farmers for livestock’s growth
16. Increasing non-farming employment avenues
2.0 BASICS OF BENCHMARKING IN IRRIGATION
SYSTEMS
The best performance sub-systeminanirrigation projects or
the system as a whole is considering as a benchmark and
other sub-system in a particular irrigation system or other
irrigation projects when compared with the best
performance is termed as ‘Benchmarking of irrigation
system’ .Thus ,benchmarking process may be undertaken in
two ways i.e.
1) Internal benchmarking or process benchmarking
2) External benchmarking and metric benchmarking
In the case of internal benchmarking the comprising is
accomplished with various with various sub-systems of a
project where as in external benchmarking various projects
located in almost similar agro-climatic zones are compared.
In case of projects located in different agro-climatic zones
are compared .in case of projects located in different agro-
climatic zones ,weighted parameter are considered for
various indicators off benchmarking process As per the
different of benchmarking for the irrigation industry coined
by Australian national commission on irrigation and
drainage (ANCID), Benchmarking is a process whereby
organization pursue enhanced performance by learning
about their own organization throughcomparisonwiththeir
historical performance and with the practices and outcomes
of others.

3.1 PRINCIPLE OF BENCHMARKING
Benchmarking is a accepted means of improving
performance learning from others and applying techniques
to increase efficiency ,cost saving and competitiveness .The
best performance considered as a ‘benchmark ‘and other
projects is required to be brought to that performance level.
One project may not be best in all respects .The various
benchmarks are set up for various indicators for
benchmarking activities .It is a dynamic processandthusthe
benchmarks changes from time to time as the competition
for improving efficiency of projects goes on.
3.2 ADVANTAGES OF BENCHMARKING:
This activity, by way of competitive sprit, improves
performance of a projects by identifying baseline for
improvement .It also brings out various bottlenecks coming
in the path of measures through learning from the
experience of others. By improving performance of a
projects, financial sustainability can be maintained.Thebest
performer gains publicity in its field .it becomes easy to
convince planner and policy marker’s by presenting the
results of benchmarking studies.
3.3 PERFPRMANCE INDICATORS
Currently in India 20 indicators in common use to evaluated
the performance of irrigation projects.
Table 3 performance Evaluation Indicators
S.NO PARAMETERS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
1 System
performance
 Water delivery capacity index
 Total annual volume of irrigation water
supplied
 Field application efficiency
 Annual relative irrigation supply (cum/ha)
 Annual irrigation water supply per unit
irrigated area(cum/ha)
2 Agricultural
productivity
 Output per unit command area (Rs /ha)
 Output per unit irrigated area-tonnes/ha crop
wise ,Rs /ha
 Output per unit irrigation supply (Rs/cum)
 Output per unit crop water demand (Rs/cum)
3 Financial
performance
 Cost recovery ratio
 Total O &M cost per unit area (Rs/ha)
 Total cost per person employed on O & M
works (Rs/person)
 Revenue collection performance
 Revenue per unit volume of irrigation water
supplied (Rs/cum)
 Maintenance cost to revenue ratio
 Staff members for O&M per unit area
(persons/ha)
 Total O&M cost per unit of water supplied
(Rs/cum)
4 Environmental
aspects
 Average depth to water
 Water quality (PH, alkalinity)
3.4 PROCEDURE FOR BENCHMARKING OF IRRIGATION
PROJECTS:
3.4.1 COLLECTION OF REQUIRED DATA
In case of internal performance benchmarking,data relating
to various sub-system of the project in collected and
compiled .if external benchmarking is to be carried out, data
concerning all the projects participating in the process and
located in the similaragro-climatic zones,proper weightsare
to be assigned to such projects so as to bring them,
theoretically, in the similar agro-climatic zones. As may be
seen from the list of indicators illustrated in preceding
paragraphs, following data is required to evaluate various
idicators:
1. Designed discharging capacityofcanal tocaterpeak
crop water requirement and actual carrying
capacity
2. Crop water requirement to meet evapo-
transpiration needs of the region
3. Culturable command area of the projects

4. Amount of watersuppliedto varioussub-systemsor
projects
5. Actual area irrigated
6. Staff engaged for running and maintenance of the
system and expenditure being incurres on them
7. Detailed of recovery of water charges
8. Detailed about crop production
9. Water table details
10. Details of water quality
3.4.2 ANALYSIS OF DATA
Sometimes data for a particular parameters is not directly
available in such cases the data is estimated considering all
relevant facts and figures. Since benchmarkingiscontinuous
process, proper formats and programmearetobedevisedto
handle the voluminous data. Proper checking andscrutinyis
also essential to avoid erroneous results. Adequate
infrastructure may be provided to collect, compile,
scrutinize, analyse and process the desired data .If some
important data is continuously missing arrangement for
observing such crucial data is also required.
3.4.3 COMPUTATION OF PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
A programme may be devised to carry out all desired
calculation for working out various performance indicators
as desired in para 6.0 so that by feeding relevant data ,the
value of respective performance indicator isevaluated.Once
various indicators are known, PERFORMANCE
BENCHMARKING OF IRRIGATION PROJECTS can be taken
up.
3.5 FUTURE PROGRAMMES/ STRATEGIES:
A core group has beenconstitutedunderthechairmanshipof
member (water planning and projects), Central Water
Commission to Facilitate State Govts. To carry out
performance benchmarking of irrigation systems in various
parts of country. So far six meetings of the core group have
been convened. Technical and financial assistance is being
provided by the Ministry of Water Resource, Govt. of India
and Central Water Commission to various State
Govts./project Authorities for Promoting this activity . Ithas
also been decided by the core group that work pertaining to
studies for ‘Benchmarking of Irrigation Projects’ may be
awarded to all WALMIs/IMTIs, for some specific projects
involving Project Authorities so after that some time they
may be able to carry out such studies independently.
CONCLISION
In India many of the recent irrigation projects are nosethem
a century old for example upper ganga canal projects .In the
beginning the cost benefits ratio was the prime index for the
monitoring of the irrigation projects over the period the
concept has enveloped the environmental factors ,socio –
economic factorsagro economic factorsinadditiontosystem
factors in the present digital era it becomes essential to
develop indicators indices for monitoring and evaluation of
the projects various indicators for performance evaluation
leading to benchmarking hance been described an ideal
approach and parameters for benchmarking has been listed
it is expected that this will help in making road map for
performance evaluation
REFERENCES
 Fitch DT, Stow DA ,Hope AS and Ray S. Modisnegate
in metrics as indicator of hydrological response
Rem. Sensing of env.114,2513-2523
 Molden D Sakthindhivel R. Perry CJ and K , klohem
W.H.1998 , Indicatorsforcomparingperformanceof
irrigation projects .IWM,UNDP/ 1998 master plan
for the development ofsurfacewaterresourcesLenl
K 1997 recite for maximizing benefits from surface
water COSAFRT
 Manir Ahmad Mangrio, Mohd Saffain Mirjan 2014
and Saleem Chandio
 Asad Sarwan Qureshi 2012.Rehabilation of
Irrigation and Drainage structures Performance
evaluation if Irrigation Projects
 Raghava Ran. B, Venkateshrao, S. Srikanth
international e –jouranal 2011

IRJET- Performance Evaluation of Irrigation Projects

More Related Content

What's hot (12)

Similar to IRJET- Performance Evaluation of Irrigation Projects (20)

More from IRJET Journal (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

IRJET- Performance Evaluation of Irrigation Projects