SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Lab Report Expectations


 Grade                             Expectations for each grade
         Proper lab format is followed
         Lab is typed, grammatically correct
         All data is neatly and accurately recorded
         Any assignmed questions are completely answered
         Procedures and safety rules were followed
  A
         Analysis uses data, clearly explains what happened and why, makes comparisons
         Conclusion is concise, refers back to hypothesis
         In case of group/partner labs, all members participated equally
         There are small errors in format
         Lab is typed, few grammatical errors
         Data is neatly and accurately recorded
         Most of questions are completely answered
  B
         Procedures and safety rules were followed
         Analysis uses data, mostly explains what happened and why, makes sense
         Conclusion concise, refers to hypothesis
         Members participated equally
         There are errors in lab format
         The lab is typed
         Data in not as neat or accurate as it should be
         Most questions not answered completely or accurately
  C
         Not all procedures and safety rules were followed
         Analysis doesn’t use data, not a good explanation of what happened, confusing
         Conclusion not concise, isn’t supported by data
         All members participated equally
         Lab report format not followed
         Lab report is not typed
         Data incomplete, not accurate, not neatly recorded or missing
         Questions poorly answered or not answered at all
D or F
         Procedures and safety rules were not followed
         Analysis missing or lacking in substance, information
         Conclusion does not support data or is missing
         Only some group members did all of work
Lab Report Grading Rubric


               Title,                                                Format,
             problem,     Procedure   Data   Analysis   Conclusion   grammar,
             hypothesis                                              neatness,
                 ,                                                     typed
             materials
Labs with
hypothesis      10%         20%       25%      25%         10%         10%


  Labs
 without        10%         20%       30%      30%         0%          10%
hypothesis

More Related Content

PPTX
The Anatomy of a Lab Practical and the Dissection of the Results
PPT
The Scientific Method
PPTX
A Level Practical Endorsement Training
PDF
The Scientific Method of Troubleshooting - Blithe Rocher at New Relic
PPT
Testing group’s work on fault localization
PPTX
Biology scentific method
DOC
IGCSE IA Marking and Feedback Cover page
PPTX
Bayesian End-Member Mixing Model
The Anatomy of a Lab Practical and the Dissection of the Results
The Scientific Method
A Level Practical Endorsement Training
The Scientific Method of Troubleshooting - Blithe Rocher at New Relic
Testing group’s work on fault localization
Biology scentific method
IGCSE IA Marking and Feedback Cover page
Bayesian End-Member Mixing Model

What's hot (16)

PDF
Maintaining test fairness
DOCX
Module 02 written assignment using the scientic method in y
PPTX
Software engineering 22 error detection and debugging
PPTX
Asterwrite
PPTX
Mycin 016
PPT
Sm
PPTX
Bioinformatics workflows and study design
DOCX
How to write effective test cases
PDF
There is NO test automation
PPT
Healthy Chocolate Pt5
DOCX
Module 2 module 02 course project scientic method resear
PPTX
8. free operant preference assessment
PPTX
Dfmw Spreadsheet Errors Presentation Jake Carney
PDF
10 Components of a Highly Effective Lab Safety Program
PPT
Scientific method acc 2011
PDF
Biology scimethodwkst
Maintaining test fairness
Module 02 written assignment using the scientic method in y
Software engineering 22 error detection and debugging
Asterwrite
Mycin 016
Sm
Bioinformatics workflows and study design
How to write effective test cases
There is NO test automation
Healthy Chocolate Pt5
Module 2 module 02 course project scientic method resear
8. free operant preference assessment
Dfmw Spreadsheet Errors Presentation Jake Carney
10 Components of a Highly Effective Lab Safety Program
Scientific method acc 2011
Biology scimethodwkst
Ad

Similar to Lab report expectations (20)

DOCX
Lab Report Assistant Dear Science Student, .docx
DOCX
Lab Report Marking Guide Rubric.pdfLaboratory Report Asses.docx
DOCX
Design an experiment in which you will test the effect of an acidic .docx
DOCX
Case Study 1 1Unsatisfactory 0-710.00 2Less Than Sat.docx
PDF
Internal externalassessment
PPT
Intro Research
PPT
Writing A Lab Report- Komperda
DOCX
1Unsatisfactory0.002Less than Satisfactory75.003.docx
DOCX
Dorobantu flr form_2019-20.docx
PDF
ProjectRubric.pdf
DOCX
SynopsisAppraisal Final Paper Overview and InstructionsPurp.docx
PPTX
Research made easy
DOCX
Final Applied Lab Project (1 credit Lab Component) Addresses cou.docx
PDF
After Lab Ends How Students Analyze And Interpret Experimental Data
PPTX
Grade 3 Lab Report Guide
PPTX
Lab report
PPT
Laboratory Management With Constrains Iamm 2010
PDF
The Do's & Don'ts of Lab Reports (McGill SUS Peer Tutoring)
PPTX
Analyzing+Methods+sections.pptx
DOCX
Proof Project The pumping lemma for regular languages .docx
Lab Report Assistant Dear Science Student, .docx
Lab Report Marking Guide Rubric.pdfLaboratory Report Asses.docx
Design an experiment in which you will test the effect of an acidic .docx
Case Study 1 1Unsatisfactory 0-710.00 2Less Than Sat.docx
Internal externalassessment
Intro Research
Writing A Lab Report- Komperda
1Unsatisfactory0.002Less than Satisfactory75.003.docx
Dorobantu flr form_2019-20.docx
ProjectRubric.pdf
SynopsisAppraisal Final Paper Overview and InstructionsPurp.docx
Research made easy
Final Applied Lab Project (1 credit Lab Component) Addresses cou.docx
After Lab Ends How Students Analyze And Interpret Experimental Data
Grade 3 Lab Report Guide
Lab report
Laboratory Management With Constrains Iamm 2010
The Do's & Don'ts of Lab Reports (McGill SUS Peer Tutoring)
Analyzing+Methods+sections.pptx
Proof Project The pumping lemma for regular languages .docx
Ad

More from sbarkanic (20)

DOCX
Physical science final exam review
DOCX
Newton
PPT
Waves
PPT
Electric power
PPT
Ac dc and circuits
DOC
Ohm's law worksheet ccp
DOC
Ohm's law's calculations
DOC
Ohm's law worksheet ccp
PPT
Ohm's law
PPT
Static electricity and electrical currants
DOCX
Acid bases and nuclear review sheet
DOC
Balancing equations worksheet
PPT
Chemical reactions
PPTX
Naming and writing compounds and molecules
DOC
Bonding practice
PPT
Atomic spectrum
PPTX
Rutherford
PPTX
Meinter
PPTX
Gell mann
PPTX
Democritus
Physical science final exam review
Newton
Waves
Electric power
Ac dc and circuits
Ohm's law worksheet ccp
Ohm's law's calculations
Ohm's law worksheet ccp
Ohm's law
Static electricity and electrical currants
Acid bases and nuclear review sheet
Balancing equations worksheet
Chemical reactions
Naming and writing compounds and molecules
Bonding practice
Atomic spectrum
Rutherford
Meinter
Gell mann
Democritus

Lab report expectations

  • 1. Lab Report Expectations Grade Expectations for each grade Proper lab format is followed Lab is typed, grammatically correct All data is neatly and accurately recorded Any assignmed questions are completely answered Procedures and safety rules were followed A Analysis uses data, clearly explains what happened and why, makes comparisons Conclusion is concise, refers back to hypothesis In case of group/partner labs, all members participated equally There are small errors in format Lab is typed, few grammatical errors Data is neatly and accurately recorded Most of questions are completely answered B Procedures and safety rules were followed Analysis uses data, mostly explains what happened and why, makes sense Conclusion concise, refers to hypothesis Members participated equally There are errors in lab format The lab is typed Data in not as neat or accurate as it should be Most questions not answered completely or accurately C Not all procedures and safety rules were followed Analysis doesn’t use data, not a good explanation of what happened, confusing Conclusion not concise, isn’t supported by data All members participated equally Lab report format not followed Lab report is not typed Data incomplete, not accurate, not neatly recorded or missing Questions poorly answered or not answered at all D or F Procedures and safety rules were not followed Analysis missing or lacking in substance, information Conclusion does not support data or is missing Only some group members did all of work
  • 2. Lab Report Grading Rubric Title, Format, problem, Procedure Data Analysis Conclusion grammar, hypothesis neatness, , typed materials Labs with hypothesis 10% 20% 25% 25% 10% 10% Labs without 10% 20% 30% 30% 0% 10% hypothesis