Learning to learn as professionalising pedagogy

faculty of behavioural pedagogische wetenschappen
and social sciences en onderwijskunde

23 August 2011 | 1

Learning to learn as professionalising pedagogy
How can teachers learn to support self-organising learning?

EARLI SIG 14 (Learning and professional development) round table
University of Antwerp, Belgium, 22–24 August 2012
Ernst D. Thoutenhoofd & Marieke van Roy
With contributions by Chawwah Groothuis, Annet Sikkens and Jorien Vugteveen

This slideshow is publicly available at slideshare.net/ernstt


23 August 2011 |

Educational freedom is not about the absence of authority
but about authority that carries an orientation towards freedom with it.
Gert Biesta 2008


23 August 2011 | 3

[1] Problem definition
[2] Notes on concepts and related research
[3] Our study
[4] First conclusions
[5] Round table questions


23 August 2011 | 4

Learning to learn is the ability to pursue and persist in
learning, to organise one's own learning, including through effective
management of time and information, both individually and in groups.
This competence includes awareness of one's learning process and
needs, identifying available opportunities, and the ability to overcome
obstacles in order to learn successfully. […] Learning to learn engages
learners to build on prior learning and life experiences in order to use
and apply knowledge and skills in a variety of contexts […] Motivation
and confidence are crucial to an individual's competence.
European Parliament (2006/962, §5)


23 August 2011 | 5

Unfortunately the EU’s definition confuses process and outcome:
before learners can organise their learning, they need to
learn from and with others how to organise their learning.

We conceive of this emancipatory process as
learning to learn. In schools, collective learning is organised around
formal teaching, which imposes structure and targets on learning.


23 August 2011 | 6

The problem is that currently neither education nor teaching are
oriented towards self-organising learning—on the contrary...

The competence to plan and undertake one’s own learning
would itself need to become a main goal of formal education.
But this presupposes that teachers have the competence to teach
learners how to become independent learners who can plan and
undertake their own learning.
The combination of teaching and learning competence is what we mean
to address through a professionalising pedagogy of learning.


23 August 2011 | 7

Here is a reminder about the need for research into learning to learn:

‘It was not a pleasure to become aware that I was constantly asking
myself what I should do to satisfy the lecturer. What I did, was that
enough for him? What I wanted, would he agree with me? But he kept
on stating that I could do whatever I thought was needed. I realized
that after many years of education I had apparently learnt to please
teachers… Why is it so difficult for me to count on my own experiences
and knowledge?’
Posting to a master-level course blog, 2011 (name withdrawn)


23 August 2011 | 8

[3] Our study


23 August 2011 | 9

[2.1] Self-organisation is a term we use to denote a
persistent process such as learning that is autonomous, operationally
closed and based on non-intentional principles of sociality. We consider
learning ‘self-organising’ when it does not depend on the
external authority of formal teaching.
Self-organisation (or autopoiesis) was the term used by Humberto Maturana & Francisco Varela in 1972 to describe the
structural integration of mechanism and function in living systems.


23 August 2011 | 10

[2.2] A different explanans of teaching arises
from monological and dialogical paradigms of autopoietic learning.

When learning is taken to be an neurocognitive (monologic) event, it
follows that teaching is an externally imposed factor in relation to
‘sociobiological’ learning systems.
When considered a discursive (dialogic) event, teaching may
alternatively be conceived an internal enabling condition of ‘cultural
chain’ learning systems.
Cf Wegeriff 2005


23 August 2011 | 11

[2.3] Our study borrows from the Learning to learn (L2L) project of the
British Campaign for learning, which defined learning to learn as ‘a
process of discovery about learning […] At its heart is the belief that
learning is learnable’.
• The project ran from 2000-2010
• 40 schools across the UK participated (nonprobability sample)
• Projects and reporting done by teachers, in public (Stenhouse 1981)
• Effects relate to skills and dispositions, not academic achievement
Wall et al. 2010. Study carried out by the Centre for Learning and Teaching (CfLaT), University of Newcastle upon Tyne (Dir.
David Leat). See the project website at the Campaign for Learning, www.campaign-for-learning.org.uk/cfl/learninginschools


23 August 2011 | 12

[2.4] Related findings emerged from another British study (40 schools
in 4 LEAs) called Learning how to learn, one strand of which focussed
on teachers developing ‘LHTL’ practices. Successful teachers:
• Adopt substantive beliefs (act in the ‘spirit’ of LHTL, not the letter)
• Demonstrate a capacity for strategic and reflective thinking
• Engage in collaborative enquiry (learning from research and practice)
• Benefit from supportive organisational structures
James & McCormick 2009. Funded by the Economic and Social Research Council ‘Teaching & Learning Research Programme’
(TLRP) that ran from 1999–2009. LHTL was a collaborative project carried out by the Institute of Education, the Open University
and King’s College London.


23 August 2011 | 13

[3] Our study: a teacher research network on thinking and learning


23 August 2011 | 14

Our research network aims at teacher professionalisation by inviting
teachers to experiment with thinking and learning in their teaching.

The network promotes the teaching of

thinking and learning to learn skills.
It is a multi-methods, voluntary participation study in which teachers collaborate
with university staff and students through master projects.
10 teachers (7 institutions) and 6 pg students, 2011-2012


23 August 2011 | 15

Participants subscribe to three shared objectives:
1. professionalise and innovate teaching through thinking and learning
to learn practice
2. carry out research (collect data, etc) in a scientifically sound manner
3. publicly report findings and discuss results with others

An overall aim is to enhance our collective understanding of thinking
and learning skills in education.


23 August 2011 | 16

Teachers design and plan small interventions alongside master
students, who research the ambitions and corresponding activities and
report their findings. We do not impose methods but encourage good
research practice and instruments, e.g.
• ILS—Inventory of Learning Styles; Jan Vermunt a.o. [1]
• ICALT—International Comparative Analysis of Learning and Teaching
didactic skills questionnaires and observation schemes; Wim vd Grift
a.o. [2]

[1] Scaled questionnaires available for learners in primary, secondary/tertiary and higher education. The HE version also has an
English translation. [2] Secondary only; Dutch only. Observers require prior training by UOCG.


23 August 2011 | 17

For Dutch speakers there is a project website at
www.rug.nl/pedok/onderzoek/denken_leren/


23 August 2011 | 18

In year 1 (2011-2012) the network included 7 studies:
De Steiger * a SEN school for learning-disabled children
aged 4-20
WSNS Salland a bi-weekly class for high-ability pupils in a regional
network of 35 primary schools
Noordoost polder one teacher joining two primary schools in a project
Iselinge a primary education teacher training college
Noorderpoort a cluster of professional education colleges [1]
PAMAOK003 * a course of the master in educational sciences
SPO * an HE access course for teachers
* Results now available.
[1] This project was a preliminary study carried out by 2x2 Bachelor students.


23 August 2011 |

Question Does coaching teachers lead to more effective use of
thinking skills questioning by teachers and more
initiative by pupils?

Conclusion The coaching conversations did not lead to changed
classroom practice. They did affect the professional
attitude, particularly in relation to enabling pupils to
practice their thinking skills and enabling feedback.

De Steiger
Annet Sikkens (MA)


23 August 2011 |

Question What effect does assessment for learning (AfL) have
on the learning styles of students and the inquiring
attitude of the lecturer?

Conclusion AfL positively contributed to the autonomy of
students (yet also made them more hesitant) and to
the inquiring attitude of the lecturer.

PAMAOK003
Jorien Vugteveen (MA)


23 August 2011 |

Question What effect does assessment for learning (AfL) have
on the learning of students and lecturer?

Conclusion AfL promoted an inquiring attitude in the lecturer.
AfL positively affected the learning styles of
students.
AfL extended the learning ability of students.
AfL positively affected the learnability of content.

SPO
Chawwah Groothuis


23 August 2011 | 22

[3] Our study


23 August 2011 | 23

A plenary discussion of first-year findings with schools, teachers and
students has led to some first shared conclusions. For example:

• Teachers and lecturers working ‘shoulder to shoulder’ with university
students on innovating teaching impressed schools most.
• Learning to learn places considerable demands on teachers’ inquiring
attitude and willingness to take risks with their classes.
• Beliefs about learning to learn seem to draw primarily on teachers’
and students’ own experiences as learners.


23 August 2011 | 24

‘It is definitely motivating to be able to learn what you want, but it is
also a bit scary. Because what do I want to learn?? Now we have to
think about our own learning, instead of just following the curriculum.
Which also means, indeed, you have to be motivated or else you won’t
learn. You cannot sit back for a couple of weeks and then, just before
the exam, read a summary of the literature. Which you could, if you’re
not motivated for a certain course but you still want to pass the exam.’
Posted by Brenda, a master student, on the course blog
http://pamaok003.wordpress.com


23 August 2011 | 25

[3] Our study
[5] Round table questions (4)


23 August 2011 | 26

[5.1] Design
Most findings to date seem general rather than particular.
How might we focus data and findings on the particular themes of
teaching thinking and learning to learn?


23 August 2011 | 27

[5.2] Methods
The variety in institutional types of the network is, we think, good for
the validity of the research but detrimental for reliability.
How might we optimise the reliability of the studies without resorting to
standardised quantitative methods or inhibit participation?


23 August 2011 | 28

[5.3] Practice
A noted issue is that teachers may ‘forget’ the research intervention
and fall back into their habitual didactic routines.
How might we balance teaching habits with research rigour?


23 August 2011 | 29

[5.4] Theory and ethics
The many intentions and practices invested in the research network
raise issues about our own position and orientation as researchers.
How might we actively pursue relevance and coherence (applied
science), trace their emergence or shaping (phenomenology), and
analyse their co-construction (critical science), all at the same time?


23 August 2011 | 30

End
References on the next slide.


23 August 2011 | 31

Further reading

Biesta, Gert (2008) Beyond learning: Democratic education for a human future. Paradigm Publishers.
European Parliament (2006) Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 on key
competences for lifelong learning. Official Journal for the European Union 2006/962:L394/16.
Grift, Wim van de (2007) Quality of teaching in four European countries: A review of the literature and application of an
assessment instrument. Educational Research 49(2):127–152.
James, Mary and Robert McCormick (2009) Teachers learning how to learn. Teaching and Teacher Education 25(7):973–982.
Stenhouse, Lawrence (1981) What counts as research? British Journal of Educational Studies 29(2):103–114.
Varela, Francisco and Humberto Maturana (1972) Mechanism and biological explanation. Philosophy of Science 39(3):378–
382.
Vermunt, Jan D.H.M. (1987) Learning styles and self-regulation. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American
Educational Research Association. Washington, DC, April 20-24, 1987 (available through ERIC).
Wall, K., Elaine Hall, Vivienne Baumfield, Steve Higgins, Victoria Rafferty, Richard Remedios, Ulrike Thomas, Licy Tiplady,
Carl Towler and Pam Woolner (2010) Learning to learn in schools phase 4 and Learning to learn in further education.
London: Campaign for Learning.
Wegeriff, Rupert (2005) Reason and creativity in classroom dialogues. Language and Education 19(3):223–237

Learning to learn as professionalising pedagogy

More Related Content

What's hot (17)

Viewers also liked (7)

Similar to Learning to learn as professionalising pedagogy (20)

More from Ernst Thoutenhoofd (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Learning to learn as professionalising pedagogy