SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Soils and their Classification
Soils - What are they?
Particulate materials
- Sedimentary origins (usually)
- Residual
Wide range of particle sizes
- larger particles: quartz, feldspar
- very small particles: clay minerals
Voids between particles
Aragonite-rich soil x 2000
Lecture 4
Need for Simple Classification
Usually soil on site has to be used.
– Soils differ from other engineering materials in that
one has little control over their properties
Extent and properties of the soil have to be determined
Cheap and simple tests are required to give an indication
of engineering properties, e.g. stiffness, strength, for
preliminary design
The classification must use core samples obtained from the ground.
This information is often supplemented by in-situ tests such as cone
penetration tests.
Classification based on Particle Size
Particle size is used because it is related to mineralogy
– e.g. very small particles usually contain clay minerals
Broad Classification
– Coarse grained soils
» sands, gravels - visible to naked eye
Classification based on Particle Size
Particle size is used because it is related to mineralogy
– e.g. very small particles usually contain clay minerals
Broad Classification
– Coarse grained soils
» sands, gravels - visible to naked eye
– Fine grained soils
» silts, clays, organic soils
Procedure for grain size determination
Sieving - used for particles > 75 µm
Hydrometer test - used for smaller particles
– Analysis based on Stoke’s Law, velocity proportional to diameter
Procedure for grain size determination
Sieving - used for particles > 75 µm
Hydrometer test - used for smaller particles
– Analysis based on Stoke’s Law, velocity proportional to diameter
Figure 1 Schematic diagram of hydrometer test
Procedure for grain size determination
Sieving - used for particles > 75 µm
Hydrometer test - used for smaller particles
– Analysis based on Stoke’s Law, velocity proportional to diameter
Figure 1 Schematic diagram of hydrometer test
Grading curves
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
0
20
40
60
80
100
Particle size (mm)
%Finer
W Well graded
Grading curves
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
0
20
40
60
80
100
Particle size (mm)
%Finer
W Well graded
U Uniform
Grading curves
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
0
20
40
60
80
100
Particle size (mm)
%Finer
W Well graded
U Uniform
P Poorly graded
Grading curves
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
0
20
40
60
80
100
Particle size (mm)
%Finer
W Well graded
U Uniform
P Poorly graded
C Well graded with some clay
Grading curves
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
0
20
40
60
80
100
Particle size (mm)
%Finer
W Well graded
U Uniform
P Poorly graded
C Well graded with some clay
F Well graded with an excess of fines
Simple Classification
In general soils contain a wide range of particle sizes
Some means of describing the characteristics of soils with
different proportions of sand/silt/clay is required.
Simple Classification
In general soils contain a wide range of particle sizes
Some means of describing the characteristics of soils with
different proportions of sand/silt/clay is required.
1009080706050403020100
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Silt Sizes (%)
SandSizes(%)
ClaySizes(%)
Sand
Silty Sand Sandy Silt
Clay-Sand Clay-Silt
Sandy Clay Silty Clay
Clay
LOWER MISSISSIPPI VALLEY DIVISION,
U. S. ENGINEER DEPT.
Simple Classification
In general soils contain a wide range of particle sizes
Some means of describing the characteristics of soils with
different proportions of sand/silt/clay is required.
Note the importance of clay - Finest 20% control behaviour
1009080706050403020100
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Silt Sizes (%)
SandSizes(%)
ClaySizes(%)
Sand
Silty Sand Sandy Silt
Clay-Sand Clay-Silt
Sandy Clay Silty Clay
Clay
LOWER MISSISSIPPI VALLEY DIVISION,
U. S. ENGINEER DEPT.
Example: equal amounts sand/silt/clay
Example: equal amounts sand/silt/clay
Example: equal amounts sand/silt/clay
Atterberg Limits
Particle size is not that useful for fine grained soils
Atterberg Limits
Particle size is not that useful for fine grained soils
Figure 4 Moisture content versus volume relation during drying
0
10
20
30
40
0 20 40 60Moisture Content (%)
Volume
LLSL PL
Atterberg Limits
Particle size is not that useful for fine grained soils
Figure 4 Moisture content versus volume relation during
drying
SL - Shrinkage Limit
PL - Plastic Limit
LL - Liquid limit
0
10
20
30
40
0 20 40 60Moisture Content (%)
Volume
LLSL PL
Atterberg Limits
SL - Shrinkage Limit
PL - Plastic Limit
LL - Liquid limit
Atterberg Limits
SL - Shrinkage Limit
PL - Plastic Limit
LL - Liquid limit
Plasticity Index = LL - PL = PI or Ip
Atterberg Limits
SL - Shrinkage Limit
PL - Plastic Limit
LL - Liquid limit
Plasticity Index = LL - PL = PI or Ip
Liquidity Index = (m - PL)/Ip = LI
Classification Systems
Used to determine the suitability of different soils
Used to develop correlations with useful soil properties
Special Purpose (Local) Systems
– e.g. PRA system of AAHSO
» 1. Well graded sand or gravel: may include fines
» 2. Sands and Gravels with excess fines
» 3. Fine sands
» 4. Low compressibility silts
» 5. High compressibility silts
» 6. Low to medium compressibility clays
» 7. High compressibility clays
» 8. Peat and organic soils
Unified Soil Classification
Each soil is given a 2 letter classification (e.g. SW). The
following procedure is used.
Unified Soil Classification
Each soil is given a 2 letter classification (e.g. SW). The
following procedure is used.
– Coarse grained (>50% larger than 75 µm)
Unified Soil Classification
Each soil is given a 2 letter classification (e.g. SW). The
following procedure is used.
– Coarse grained (>50% larger than 75 µm)
» Prefix S if > 50% of coarse is Sand
» Prefix G if > 50% of coarse is Gravel
Unified Soil Classification
Each soil is given a 2 letter classification (e.g. SW). The
following procedure is used.
– Coarse grained (>50% larger than 75 µm)
» Prefix S if > 50% of coarse is Sand
» Prefix G if > 50% of coarse is Gravel
» Suffix depends on %fines
Unified Soil Classification
Each soil is given a 2 letter classification (e.g. SW). The
following procedure is used.
– Coarse grained (>50% larger than 75 µm)
» Prefix S if > 50% of coarse is Sand
» Prefix G if > 50% of coarse is Gravel
» Suffix depends on %fines
» if %fines < 5% suffix is either W or P
» if %fines > 12% suffix is either M or C
» if 5% < %fines < 12% Dual symbols are used
Unified Soil Classification
To determine if W or P, calculate Cu and Cc
C
D
D
u = 60
10
C
D
D D
c =
×
30
2
60 10( )
x% of the soil has particles
smaller than Dx
Unified Soil Classification
To determine W or P, calculate Cu and Cc
C
D
D
u = 60
10
C
D
D D
c =
×
30
2
60 10( )
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
0
20
40
60
80
100
Particle size (mm)
%Finer
x% of the soil has particles
smaller than Dx
Unified Soil Classification
To determine W or P, calculate Cu and Cc
C
D
D
u = 60
10
C
D
D D
c =
×
30
2
60 10( )
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
0
20
40
60
80
100
Particle size (mm)
%Finer
x% of the soil has particles
smaller than Dx
Unified Soil Classification
To determine W or P, calculate Cu and Cc
C
D
D
u = 60
10
C
D
D D
c =
×
30
2
60 10( )
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
0
20
40
60
80
100
Particle size (mm)
%Finer
D90 = 3
mm
x% of the soil has particles
smaller than Dx
Unified Soil Classification
To determine W or P, calculate Cu and Cc
If prefix is G then suffix is W if Cu > 4 and Cc is between 1 and 3
otherwise use P
C
D
D
u = 60
10
C
D
D D
c =
×
30
2
60 10( )
Unified Soil Classification
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Liquid limit
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Plasticityindex
CH
OH
or
MH
CL
OL
ML
or
CL
ML
"A" line
Comparing soils at equal liquid limit
Toughness and dry strength increase
with increasing plasticity index
Plasticity chart
for laboratory classification of fine grained soils
Coarse grained soils
To determine M or C use plasticity chart
Below A-line use suffix M - Silt
Above A-line use suffix C - Clay
Unified Soil Classification
– Fine grained soils (> 50% finer than 75 µm)
– Both letters determined from plasticity chart
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Liquid limit
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Plasticityindex
CH
OH
or
MH
CL
OL
ML
or
CL
ML
"A" line
Comparing soils at equal liquid limit
Toughness and dry strength increase
with increasing plasticity index
Plasticity chart
for laboratory classification of fine grained soils
Give typical names: indicate ap-
proximate percentages of sand
and gravel: maximum size:
angularity, surface condition,
and hardness of the coarse
grains: local or geological name
and other pertinent descriptive
information and symbol in
parentheses.
For undisturbed soils add infor-
mation on stratification, degree
of compactness, cementation,
moisture conditions and drain-
age characteristics.
Example:
Well graded gravels, gravel-
sand mixtures, little or no
fines
Poorly graded gravels, gravel-
sand mixtures, little or no
fines
Silty gravels, poorly
graded gravel-sand-silt mixtures
Clayey gravels, poorly graded
gravel-sand-clay mixtures
Well graded sands, gravelly
sands, little or no fines
Poorly graded sands, gravelly
sands, little or no fines
Silty sands, poorly graded
sand-silt mixtures
Clayey sands, poorly graded
sand-clay mixtures
GW
GP
GM
GC
SW
SP
SM
SC
Wide range of grain size and substantial
amounts of all intermediate particle
sizes
Predominantly one size or a range of
sizes with some intermediate sizes
missing
Non-plastic fines (for identification
procedures see ML below)
Plastic fines (for identification pro-
cedures see CL below)
Wide range in grain sizes and sub-
stantial amounts of all intermediate
particle sizes
Predominantely one size or a range of
sizes with some intermediate sizes missing
Non-plastic fines (for identification pro-
cedures, see ML below)
Plastic fines (for identification pro-
cedures, see CL below)
ML
CL,CI
OL
MH
CH
OH
Pt
Dry strength
crushing
character-
istics
None to
slight
Medium to
high
Slight to
medium
Slight to
medium
High to very
high
Medium to
high
Readily identified by colour, odour
spongy feel and frequently by fibrous
texture
Dilatency
(reaction
to shaking)
Quick to
slow
None to very
slow
Slow
Slow to
none
None
None to very
high
Toughness
(consistency
near plastic
limit)
None
Medium
Slight
Slight to
medium
High
Slight to
medium
Inorganic silts and very fine sands,
rock flour, silty or clayey
fine sands with slight plasticity
Inorganic clays of low to medium
plasticity, gravelly clays, sandy
clays, silty clays, lean clays
Organic silts and organic silt-
clays of low plasticity
inorganic silts, micaceous or
dictomaceous fine sandy or
silty soils, elastic silts
Inorganic clays of high
plasticity, fat clays
Organic clays of medium to
high plasticity
Peat and other highly organic soils
Give typical name; indicate degree
and character of plasticity,
amount and maximum size of
coarse grains: colour in wet con-
dition, odour if any, local or
geological name, and other pert-
inent descriptive information, and
symbol in parentheses
For undisturbed soils add infor-
mation on structure, stratif-
ication, consistency and undis-
turbed and remoulded states,
moisture and drainage conditions
Example
Clayey silt, brown: slightly plastic:
small percentage of fine sand:
numerous vertical root holes: firm
and dry in places; loess; (ML)
Field identification procedures
(Excluding particles larger than 75mm and basing fractions on
estimated weights)
Group
symbols
1
Typical names Information required for
describing soils
Laboratory classification
criteria
C = Greater than 4
D
D
----60
10
U
C = Between 1 and 3
(D )
D x D
----------------------30
10
c
2
60
Not meeting all gradation requirements for GW
Atterberg limits below
"A" line or PI less than 4
Atterberg limits above "A"
line with PI greater than 7
Above "A" line with
PI between 4 and 7
are borderline cases
requiring use of dual
symbols
Not meeting all gradation requirements for SW
C = Greater than 6
D
D
----60
10
U
C = Between 1 and 3
(D )
D x D
----------------------30
10
c
2
60
Atterberg limits below
"A" line or PI less than 4
Atterberg limits above "A"
line with PI greater than 7
Above "A" line with
PI between 4 and 7
are borderline cases
requiring use of dual
symbols
Determinepercentagesofgravelandsandfromgrainsizecurve
Usegrainsizecurveinidentifyingthefractionsasgivenunderfieldidentification
Dependingonpercentagesoffines(fractionsmallerthan.075mm
sievesize)coarsegrainedsoilsareclassifiedasfollows
Lessthan5%
Morethan12%
5%to12%
GW,GP,SW,SP
GM,GC,SM,SC
Bordelinecaserequiringuseofdualsymbols
The.075mmsievesizeisaboutthesmallestparticlevisibletothenakedeye
Finegrainedsoils
Morethanhalfofmaterialissmallerthan
.075mmsievesize
Coarsegrainedsoils
Morethanhalfofmaterialislargerthan
.075mmsievesize
Siltsandclays
liquidlimit
greaterthan
50
Siltsandclays
liquidlimit
lessthan50
Sands
Morethanhalfofcoarse
fractionissmallerthan
2.36mm
Gravels
Morethanhalfofcoarse
fractionislargerthan
2.36mm
Sandswith
fines
(appreciable
amountoffines)
Cleansands
(littleorno
fines)
Gravelswith
fines
(apreciable
amountoffines)
Cleangravels
(littleorno
fines)
Identification procedure on fraction smaller than .425mm
sieve size
Highly organic soils
Unified soil classification (including identification and description)
Silty sand, gravelly; about 20%
hard angular gravel particles
12.5mm maximum size; rounded
and subangular sand grains
coarse to fine, about 15% non-
plastic lines with low dry
strength; well compacted and
moist in places; alluvial sand;
(SM)
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Liquid limit
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Plasticityindex
CH
OH
or
MH
OL
ML
or
CL
"A
" line
Comparing soils at equal liquid limit
Toughness and dry strength increase
with increasing plasticity index
Plasticity chart
for laboratory classification of fine grained soils
CI
CL-MLCL-ML
Example
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
0
20
40
60
80
100
Particle size (mm)
%Finer
Example
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
0
20
40
60
80
100
Particle size (mm)
%Finer
• %fines (% finer than 75 µm) = 11% - Dual symbols required
Example
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
0
20
40
60
80
100
Particle size (mm)
%Finer
• %fines (% finer than 75 µm) = 11% - Dual symbols required
• D10 = 0.06 mm, D30 = 0.25 mm, D60 = 0.75 mm
Example
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
0
20
40
60
80
100
Particle size (mm)
%Finer
Particle size fractions: Gravel 17%
Sand 73%
Silt and Clay 10%
Of the coarse fraction about 80% is sand, hence Prefix is S
Cu = 12.5, Cc = 1.38
Suffix1 = W
From Atterberg Tests
LL = 32, PL = 26
Ip = 32 - 26 = 6
Example
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Liquid limit
0
10
20
30
40
50
60Plasticityindex
CH
OH
or
MH
CL
OL
ML
or
CL
ML
"A" line
Comparing soils at equal liquid limit
Toughness and dry strength increase
with increasing plasticity index
Plasticity chart
for laboratory classification of fine grained soils
Of the coarse fraction about 80% is sand, hence Prefix is S
Cu = 12.5, Cc = 1.38
Suffix1 = W
From Atterberg Tests
LL = 32, PL = 26
Ip = 32 - 26 = 6
From Plasticity Chart point lies below A-line
Suffix2 = M
Of the coarse fraction about 80% is sand, hence Prefix is S
Cu = 12.5, Cc = 1.38
Suffix1 = W
From Atterberg Tests
LL = 32, PL = 26
Ip = 32 - 26 = 6
From Plasticity Chart point lies below A-line
Suffix2 = M
Dual Symbols are SW-SM
Of the coarse fraction about 80% is sand, hence Prefix is S
Cu = 12.5, Cc = 1.38
Suffix1 = W
From Atterberg Tests
LL = 32, PL = 26
Ip = 32 - 26 = 6
From Plasticity Chart point lies below A-line
Suffix2 = M
Dual Symbols are SW-SM
To complete the classification the Symbols should be accompanied
by a description

More Related Content

PDF
Consolidation nicee ppt
PPSX
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #23: Rankine Earth Pressure Theory]
PPTX
PPTX
Reinforced soil structure and geotextile
PDF
TERZAGHI’S BEARING CAPACITY THEORY
PDF
Control Seepage Thought Earth Dams
PPTX
Types of failure in rigid pavements
PDF
Geotechnical investigations for tunnelling
Consolidation nicee ppt
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #23: Rankine Earth Pressure Theory]
Reinforced soil structure and geotextile
TERZAGHI’S BEARING CAPACITY THEORY
Control Seepage Thought Earth Dams
Types of failure in rigid pavements
Geotechnical investigations for tunnelling

What's hot (20)

PPTX
Geosynthetics- Types, and their use in Retaining Walls
PPTX
Soil arching in granular soil
PDF
Geology - clay minerals and geotechnical problems
PPT
Scope of Geology for Civil Engineer
PDF
Settlement of shallow foundation
PPTX
importance of geology in civil
DOC
CNS layer (usefulsearch.org) (useful search)
PPTX
Deep compaction techniques
PDF
Consolidacion
PDF
Consolidation test of soil
PPT
Bearing capacity_of_soil
PPSX
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #13: Elastic Settlements]
PPTX
Introduction and types of soil mechanics
PPSX
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #11: Settlement Computation]
PPTX
Grouting
PDF
Grouting Methods
PDF
Tunnels and tunneling (Engineering Geology)
PDF
Pile Foundations
Geosynthetics- Types, and their use in Retaining Walls
Soil arching in granular soil
Geology - clay minerals and geotechnical problems
Scope of Geology for Civil Engineer
Settlement of shallow foundation
importance of geology in civil
CNS layer (usefulsearch.org) (useful search)
Deep compaction techniques
Consolidacion
Consolidation test of soil
Bearing capacity_of_soil
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #13: Elastic Settlements]
Introduction and types of soil mechanics
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #11: Settlement Computation]
Grouting
Grouting Methods
Tunnels and tunneling (Engineering Geology)
Pile Foundations
Ad

Viewers also liked (20)

PPT
Soil Classification
PPT
0137033451 pp2
PPTX
ST.MARY's HSSchool,Kulachal ,Kanyakumari DT"Safety road crossing"
PPTX
Pseudo dynamic analysis of soil nailed slope
DOCX
green concrete
PPSX
Working On Public Construction Projects Primer for Engineers in Illinois
PPTX
sedimaging for soil classification
PPT
Lecture 4 canadian soil classification
PDF
14 of the most disturbing movies ever made
PPTX
Soil classification
PPT
Special Concrete - High End Out put Value for Materials
PPTX
Earthquake collapse pattern
PDF
3.4 the soil system.ppt
PPTX
1206765 634528654292080000
PPTX
Paresh
PPTX
SMA presentation
PPTX
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY GLASS CONCRETE
PDF
PPt - An Overview of the Engineering World
PPT
Discoloration of stone masonry
PPTX
Ejaz 2
Soil Classification
0137033451 pp2
ST.MARY's HSSchool,Kulachal ,Kanyakumari DT"Safety road crossing"
Pseudo dynamic analysis of soil nailed slope
green concrete
Working On Public Construction Projects Primer for Engineers in Illinois
sedimaging for soil classification
Lecture 4 canadian soil classification
14 of the most disturbing movies ever made
Soil classification
Special Concrete - High End Out put Value for Materials
Earthquake collapse pattern
3.4 the soil system.ppt
1206765 634528654292080000
Paresh
SMA presentation
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY GLASS CONCRETE
PPt - An Overview of the Engineering World
Discoloration of stone masonry
Ejaz 2
Ad

Similar to Lecture 4 (20)

PPTX
Classification of soil by (ISCS)
PPT
Unified training-part-b
PPT
Soil classification 1
PPT
Pavement Engineering Materials_4
PPT
Soil Classification.ppt
PDF
Atterberg limit interpretation
PPT
Ppt sieveanalysis-130303223118-phpapp02
PPTX
Soil Classification of Soils. ASSHTO USC
PDF
Geotechnical Lab Manual PU.pdf
PPS
Pe Test Geotechnical Rerview
PPT
Properties of Sand
PPTX
classification of soil details aas per is ,us,classification geotechnical eng...
PDF
Geotechformulas
PDF
Geotechformulas
PDF
Geotechformulas
PPTX
SOIL MECHANICS INTRODUCTION WITH ADVANTAGES AND WHY SOIL MECHANICS STUDY IS S...
PPT
3 a index properties of soil
PDF
Classification and Interpretaiton of Soil
PPT
soil classification by n sivakugan geoneknik engineering
PPTX
Classification of soils: Soil Mechanics
Classification of soil by (ISCS)
Unified training-part-b
Soil classification 1
Pavement Engineering Materials_4
Soil Classification.ppt
Atterberg limit interpretation
Ppt sieveanalysis-130303223118-phpapp02
Soil Classification of Soils. ASSHTO USC
Geotechnical Lab Manual PU.pdf
Pe Test Geotechnical Rerview
Properties of Sand
classification of soil details aas per is ,us,classification geotechnical eng...
Geotechformulas
Geotechformulas
Geotechformulas
SOIL MECHANICS INTRODUCTION WITH ADVANTAGES AND WHY SOIL MECHANICS STUDY IS S...
3 a index properties of soil
Classification and Interpretaiton of Soil
soil classification by n sivakugan geoneknik engineering
Classification of soils: Soil Mechanics

Lecture 4

  • 1. Soils and their Classification
  • 2. Soils - What are they? Particulate materials - Sedimentary origins (usually) - Residual Wide range of particle sizes - larger particles: quartz, feldspar - very small particles: clay minerals Voids between particles
  • 5. Need for Simple Classification Usually soil on site has to be used. – Soils differ from other engineering materials in that one has little control over their properties Extent and properties of the soil have to be determined Cheap and simple tests are required to give an indication of engineering properties, e.g. stiffness, strength, for preliminary design The classification must use core samples obtained from the ground. This information is often supplemented by in-situ tests such as cone penetration tests.
  • 6. Classification based on Particle Size Particle size is used because it is related to mineralogy – e.g. very small particles usually contain clay minerals Broad Classification – Coarse grained soils » sands, gravels - visible to naked eye
  • 7. Classification based on Particle Size Particle size is used because it is related to mineralogy – e.g. very small particles usually contain clay minerals Broad Classification – Coarse grained soils » sands, gravels - visible to naked eye – Fine grained soils » silts, clays, organic soils
  • 8. Procedure for grain size determination Sieving - used for particles > 75 µm Hydrometer test - used for smaller particles – Analysis based on Stoke’s Law, velocity proportional to diameter
  • 9. Procedure for grain size determination Sieving - used for particles > 75 µm Hydrometer test - used for smaller particles – Analysis based on Stoke’s Law, velocity proportional to diameter Figure 1 Schematic diagram of hydrometer test
  • 10. Procedure for grain size determination Sieving - used for particles > 75 µm Hydrometer test - used for smaller particles – Analysis based on Stoke’s Law, velocity proportional to diameter Figure 1 Schematic diagram of hydrometer test
  • 11. Grading curves 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 0 20 40 60 80 100 Particle size (mm) %Finer W Well graded
  • 12. Grading curves 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 0 20 40 60 80 100 Particle size (mm) %Finer W Well graded U Uniform
  • 13. Grading curves 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 0 20 40 60 80 100 Particle size (mm) %Finer W Well graded U Uniform P Poorly graded
  • 14. Grading curves 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 0 20 40 60 80 100 Particle size (mm) %Finer W Well graded U Uniform P Poorly graded C Well graded with some clay
  • 15. Grading curves 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 0 20 40 60 80 100 Particle size (mm) %Finer W Well graded U Uniform P Poorly graded C Well graded with some clay F Well graded with an excess of fines
  • 16. Simple Classification In general soils contain a wide range of particle sizes Some means of describing the characteristics of soils with different proportions of sand/silt/clay is required.
  • 17. Simple Classification In general soils contain a wide range of particle sizes Some means of describing the characteristics of soils with different proportions of sand/silt/clay is required. 1009080706050403020100 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Silt Sizes (%) SandSizes(%) ClaySizes(%) Sand Silty Sand Sandy Silt Clay-Sand Clay-Silt Sandy Clay Silty Clay Clay LOWER MISSISSIPPI VALLEY DIVISION, U. S. ENGINEER DEPT.
  • 18. Simple Classification In general soils contain a wide range of particle sizes Some means of describing the characteristics of soils with different proportions of sand/silt/clay is required. Note the importance of clay - Finest 20% control behaviour 1009080706050403020100 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Silt Sizes (%) SandSizes(%) ClaySizes(%) Sand Silty Sand Sandy Silt Clay-Sand Clay-Silt Sandy Clay Silty Clay Clay LOWER MISSISSIPPI VALLEY DIVISION, U. S. ENGINEER DEPT.
  • 19. Example: equal amounts sand/silt/clay
  • 20. Example: equal amounts sand/silt/clay
  • 21. Example: equal amounts sand/silt/clay
  • 22. Atterberg Limits Particle size is not that useful for fine grained soils
  • 23. Atterberg Limits Particle size is not that useful for fine grained soils Figure 4 Moisture content versus volume relation during drying 0 10 20 30 40 0 20 40 60Moisture Content (%) Volume LLSL PL
  • 24. Atterberg Limits Particle size is not that useful for fine grained soils Figure 4 Moisture content versus volume relation during drying SL - Shrinkage Limit PL - Plastic Limit LL - Liquid limit 0 10 20 30 40 0 20 40 60Moisture Content (%) Volume LLSL PL
  • 25. Atterberg Limits SL - Shrinkage Limit PL - Plastic Limit LL - Liquid limit
  • 26. Atterberg Limits SL - Shrinkage Limit PL - Plastic Limit LL - Liquid limit Plasticity Index = LL - PL = PI or Ip
  • 27. Atterberg Limits SL - Shrinkage Limit PL - Plastic Limit LL - Liquid limit Plasticity Index = LL - PL = PI or Ip Liquidity Index = (m - PL)/Ip = LI
  • 28. Classification Systems Used to determine the suitability of different soils Used to develop correlations with useful soil properties Special Purpose (Local) Systems – e.g. PRA system of AAHSO » 1. Well graded sand or gravel: may include fines » 2. Sands and Gravels with excess fines » 3. Fine sands » 4. Low compressibility silts » 5. High compressibility silts » 6. Low to medium compressibility clays » 7. High compressibility clays » 8. Peat and organic soils
  • 29. Unified Soil Classification Each soil is given a 2 letter classification (e.g. SW). The following procedure is used.
  • 30. Unified Soil Classification Each soil is given a 2 letter classification (e.g. SW). The following procedure is used. – Coarse grained (>50% larger than 75 µm)
  • 31. Unified Soil Classification Each soil is given a 2 letter classification (e.g. SW). The following procedure is used. – Coarse grained (>50% larger than 75 µm) » Prefix S if > 50% of coarse is Sand » Prefix G if > 50% of coarse is Gravel
  • 32. Unified Soil Classification Each soil is given a 2 letter classification (e.g. SW). The following procedure is used. – Coarse grained (>50% larger than 75 µm) » Prefix S if > 50% of coarse is Sand » Prefix G if > 50% of coarse is Gravel » Suffix depends on %fines
  • 33. Unified Soil Classification Each soil is given a 2 letter classification (e.g. SW). The following procedure is used. – Coarse grained (>50% larger than 75 µm) » Prefix S if > 50% of coarse is Sand » Prefix G if > 50% of coarse is Gravel » Suffix depends on %fines » if %fines < 5% suffix is either W or P » if %fines > 12% suffix is either M or C » if 5% < %fines < 12% Dual symbols are used
  • 34. Unified Soil Classification To determine if W or P, calculate Cu and Cc C D D u = 60 10 C D D D c = × 30 2 60 10( ) x% of the soil has particles smaller than Dx
  • 35. Unified Soil Classification To determine W or P, calculate Cu and Cc C D D u = 60 10 C D D D c = × 30 2 60 10( ) 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 0 20 40 60 80 100 Particle size (mm) %Finer x% of the soil has particles smaller than Dx
  • 36. Unified Soil Classification To determine W or P, calculate Cu and Cc C D D u = 60 10 C D D D c = × 30 2 60 10( ) 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 0 20 40 60 80 100 Particle size (mm) %Finer x% of the soil has particles smaller than Dx
  • 37. Unified Soil Classification To determine W or P, calculate Cu and Cc C D D u = 60 10 C D D D c = × 30 2 60 10( ) 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 0 20 40 60 80 100 Particle size (mm) %Finer D90 = 3 mm x% of the soil has particles smaller than Dx
  • 38. Unified Soil Classification To determine W or P, calculate Cu and Cc If prefix is G then suffix is W if Cu > 4 and Cc is between 1 and 3 otherwise use P C D D u = 60 10 C D D D c = × 30 2 60 10( )
  • 39. Unified Soil Classification 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Liquid limit 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Plasticityindex CH OH or MH CL OL ML or CL ML "A" line Comparing soils at equal liquid limit Toughness and dry strength increase with increasing plasticity index Plasticity chart for laboratory classification of fine grained soils Coarse grained soils To determine M or C use plasticity chart Below A-line use suffix M - Silt Above A-line use suffix C - Clay
  • 40. Unified Soil Classification – Fine grained soils (> 50% finer than 75 µm) – Both letters determined from plasticity chart 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Liquid limit 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Plasticityindex CH OH or MH CL OL ML or CL ML "A" line Comparing soils at equal liquid limit Toughness and dry strength increase with increasing plasticity index Plasticity chart for laboratory classification of fine grained soils
  • 41. Give typical names: indicate ap- proximate percentages of sand and gravel: maximum size: angularity, surface condition, and hardness of the coarse grains: local or geological name and other pertinent descriptive information and symbol in parentheses. For undisturbed soils add infor- mation on stratification, degree of compactness, cementation, moisture conditions and drain- age characteristics. Example: Well graded gravels, gravel- sand mixtures, little or no fines Poorly graded gravels, gravel- sand mixtures, little or no fines Silty gravels, poorly graded gravel-sand-silt mixtures Clayey gravels, poorly graded gravel-sand-clay mixtures Well graded sands, gravelly sands, little or no fines Poorly graded sands, gravelly sands, little or no fines Silty sands, poorly graded sand-silt mixtures Clayey sands, poorly graded sand-clay mixtures GW GP GM GC SW SP SM SC Wide range of grain size and substantial amounts of all intermediate particle sizes Predominantly one size or a range of sizes with some intermediate sizes missing Non-plastic fines (for identification procedures see ML below) Plastic fines (for identification pro- cedures see CL below) Wide range in grain sizes and sub- stantial amounts of all intermediate particle sizes Predominantely one size or a range of sizes with some intermediate sizes missing Non-plastic fines (for identification pro- cedures, see ML below) Plastic fines (for identification pro- cedures, see CL below) ML CL,CI OL MH CH OH Pt Dry strength crushing character- istics None to slight Medium to high Slight to medium Slight to medium High to very high Medium to high Readily identified by colour, odour spongy feel and frequently by fibrous texture Dilatency (reaction to shaking) Quick to slow None to very slow Slow Slow to none None None to very high Toughness (consistency near plastic limit) None Medium Slight Slight to medium High Slight to medium Inorganic silts and very fine sands, rock flour, silty or clayey fine sands with slight plasticity Inorganic clays of low to medium plasticity, gravelly clays, sandy clays, silty clays, lean clays Organic silts and organic silt- clays of low plasticity inorganic silts, micaceous or dictomaceous fine sandy or silty soils, elastic silts Inorganic clays of high plasticity, fat clays Organic clays of medium to high plasticity Peat and other highly organic soils Give typical name; indicate degree and character of plasticity, amount and maximum size of coarse grains: colour in wet con- dition, odour if any, local or geological name, and other pert- inent descriptive information, and symbol in parentheses For undisturbed soils add infor- mation on structure, stratif- ication, consistency and undis- turbed and remoulded states, moisture and drainage conditions Example Clayey silt, brown: slightly plastic: small percentage of fine sand: numerous vertical root holes: firm and dry in places; loess; (ML) Field identification procedures (Excluding particles larger than 75mm and basing fractions on estimated weights) Group symbols 1 Typical names Information required for describing soils Laboratory classification criteria C = Greater than 4 D D ----60 10 U C = Between 1 and 3 (D ) D x D ----------------------30 10 c 2 60 Not meeting all gradation requirements for GW Atterberg limits below "A" line or PI less than 4 Atterberg limits above "A" line with PI greater than 7 Above "A" line with PI between 4 and 7 are borderline cases requiring use of dual symbols Not meeting all gradation requirements for SW C = Greater than 6 D D ----60 10 U C = Between 1 and 3 (D ) D x D ----------------------30 10 c 2 60 Atterberg limits below "A" line or PI less than 4 Atterberg limits above "A" line with PI greater than 7 Above "A" line with PI between 4 and 7 are borderline cases requiring use of dual symbols Determinepercentagesofgravelandsandfromgrainsizecurve Usegrainsizecurveinidentifyingthefractionsasgivenunderfieldidentification Dependingonpercentagesoffines(fractionsmallerthan.075mm sievesize)coarsegrainedsoilsareclassifiedasfollows Lessthan5% Morethan12% 5%to12% GW,GP,SW,SP GM,GC,SM,SC Bordelinecaserequiringuseofdualsymbols The.075mmsievesizeisaboutthesmallestparticlevisibletothenakedeye Finegrainedsoils Morethanhalfofmaterialissmallerthan .075mmsievesize Coarsegrainedsoils Morethanhalfofmaterialislargerthan .075mmsievesize Siltsandclays liquidlimit greaterthan 50 Siltsandclays liquidlimit lessthan50 Sands Morethanhalfofcoarse fractionissmallerthan 2.36mm Gravels Morethanhalfofcoarse fractionislargerthan 2.36mm Sandswith fines (appreciable amountoffines) Cleansands (littleorno fines) Gravelswith fines (apreciable amountoffines) Cleangravels (littleorno fines) Identification procedure on fraction smaller than .425mm sieve size Highly organic soils Unified soil classification (including identification and description) Silty sand, gravelly; about 20% hard angular gravel particles 12.5mm maximum size; rounded and subangular sand grains coarse to fine, about 15% non- plastic lines with low dry strength; well compacted and moist in places; alluvial sand; (SM) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Liquid limit 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Plasticityindex CH OH or MH OL ML or CL "A " line Comparing soils at equal liquid limit Toughness and dry strength increase with increasing plasticity index Plasticity chart for laboratory classification of fine grained soils CI CL-MLCL-ML
  • 42. Example 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 0 20 40 60 80 100 Particle size (mm) %Finer
  • 43. Example 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 0 20 40 60 80 100 Particle size (mm) %Finer • %fines (% finer than 75 µm) = 11% - Dual symbols required
  • 44. Example 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 0 20 40 60 80 100 Particle size (mm) %Finer • %fines (% finer than 75 µm) = 11% - Dual symbols required • D10 = 0.06 mm, D30 = 0.25 mm, D60 = 0.75 mm
  • 45. Example 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 0 20 40 60 80 100 Particle size (mm) %Finer Particle size fractions: Gravel 17% Sand 73% Silt and Clay 10%
  • 46. Of the coarse fraction about 80% is sand, hence Prefix is S Cu = 12.5, Cc = 1.38 Suffix1 = W From Atterberg Tests LL = 32, PL = 26 Ip = 32 - 26 = 6
  • 47. Example 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Liquid limit 0 10 20 30 40 50 60Plasticityindex CH OH or MH CL OL ML or CL ML "A" line Comparing soils at equal liquid limit Toughness and dry strength increase with increasing plasticity index Plasticity chart for laboratory classification of fine grained soils
  • 48. Of the coarse fraction about 80% is sand, hence Prefix is S Cu = 12.5, Cc = 1.38 Suffix1 = W From Atterberg Tests LL = 32, PL = 26 Ip = 32 - 26 = 6 From Plasticity Chart point lies below A-line Suffix2 = M
  • 49. Of the coarse fraction about 80% is sand, hence Prefix is S Cu = 12.5, Cc = 1.38 Suffix1 = W From Atterberg Tests LL = 32, PL = 26 Ip = 32 - 26 = 6 From Plasticity Chart point lies below A-line Suffix2 = M Dual Symbols are SW-SM
  • 50. Of the coarse fraction about 80% is sand, hence Prefix is S Cu = 12.5, Cc = 1.38 Suffix1 = W From Atterberg Tests LL = 32, PL = 26 Ip = 32 - 26 = 6 From Plasticity Chart point lies below A-line Suffix2 = M Dual Symbols are SW-SM To complete the classification the Symbols should be accompanied by a description

Editor's Notes