Linked Open Data in limbo: Open cultural heritage resources
Download as PPTX, PDF1 like209 views
The document discusses the evolution and current challenges of cultural heritage institutions regarding digital preservation and access, emphasizing the need for a digital mindset and effective data management. It highlights linked open data as a solution for enhancing visibility, engagement, and data enrichment through collaborative efforts with external authorities. Future steps involve utilizing open-source tools and creating better internal workflows to cater to new digital audiences while balancing the needs of traditional audiences.
Linked Open Data in limbo: Open cultural heritage resources
- 1. Linked Open Data in limbo Co-creation as a catalyst for open cultural heritage resources Open Belgium 12.03.2018 Sam Donvil Alina Saenko sam@packed.be alina@packed.be @PACKEDvzw
- 2. • 2006 - 2010: Platform for Archiving and Conservation of Art on Electronic and Digital Media • 2011 - present: Centre of Expertise Digital Heritage • Flemish, Belgian and European projects • Support for ICT-processes at heritage and arts organisations (o.a. creating, storage, cataloguing, online access, exchange and reuse) and policy thereof • Central concern: sustainability (digital heritage is vulnerable)
- 3. The museum as a changing concept: antiquity > museion Role: scholarship Audience: research community
- 4. The museum as a changing concept: renaissance > cabinet of curiosities Role: prestige, display of ‘all’ objects Audience: privileged visitors, courtiers
- 5. The museum as a changing concept: enlightenment and modern era > birth of the modern museum Role: scholarship & caretaking of objects, not necessarily display Audience: research community & privileged visitors Role: scholarship & caretaking of objects, national prestige Audience: research community, large middle class audiences
- 6. The museum as a changing concept: contemporary era > changing consumer demands
- 7. The museum as a changing concept: contemporary era > memory institution as an online knowledge source Future interpretation: -Share -Contextualise -Coordinate -Facilitate Conventional interpretation: -Control quality -Control access Current ICOM definition: A museum is a non-profit, permanent institution in the service of society and its development, open to the public, which acquires, conserves, researches, communicates and exhibits the tangible and intangible heritage of humanity and its environment for the purposes of education, study and enjoyment.
- 8. Accumulation and registration of data
- 9. Back-office: - Not a ‘popular’ topic to invest in - Often no ‘digital mindset’ inside the institutions > external IT services Data - Messy and not complete, but a lot of potential knowledge - Captured on different carriers (systems, digital and analogue files) - Often closed (and obsolete) software Audio-visual material - Different tools and DAMs, but not good enough - ‘Analogue mindset’: distributed versions and copies The situation in the Flemish artmuseums
- 11. 2012 http://smak.be/collectie_kunstenaar.php?kunstwerk_id=1461&l=a&kunstenaar_id=41
- 13. Resolver Persistent URI: 2016 - ... http://resolver.smak.be/collection/work/data/3385 http://smak.be/nl/kunstwerk/75872016 http://newwebsite.be/3542019 http://evenbetterwebsite.be/lod/the-journey2030
- 14. Enrichment of data via external authorities External authorities: - Wikidata, VIAF, RKDartists, ODIS, Geonames, AAT (Getty Vocabularies), Iconclass https://www.projectcest.be/wiki/Publicatie:Project_Persist ente_identificatie
- 15. Visualisations with internally shared data Acquisition source: From which source did a museum acquire artworks? (5 museums) - Private - Artist - Gallery - Government - The Monarchy - The Church
- 17. Blueprint distributed AV management
- 18. Making data and images accessible
- 19. Open Cultuur Data project
- 20. Open data on Wikimedia platforms Why Wikimedia? ● visibility ● reuse ● engagement
- 21. Wikidata ○ Royal Museum of Fine Arts Antwerp (7.798 artworks) ○ Museum of Fine Arts Ghent (6.973 artworks) ○ Groeningemuseum Brugge (2.858 artworks) ○ M - Museum Leuven (3.137 artworks) ○ Mu.ZEE (3.979 artworks) ○ S.M.A.K. (2.579 artworks)
- 23. Data enrichment and reuse
- 24. Data enrichment and reuse
- 25. Data enrichment and reuse
- 26. Data enrichment and reuse
- 27. Data enrichment and reuse
- 28. Data enrichment and reuse
- 29. Data enrichment and reuse
- 30. Conclusion and next steps
- 31. Why Linked Open Data in Limbo? digital movement <> no digital mindset reducing costs <> out-of-control IT-budgets new ‘digital’ audiences <> losing ‘traditional’ audiences showing off with fancy tools <> locked up in obsolete technology engaging with the ‘crowd’ <> abandoned web portals
- 32. - More IT profiles in the cultural heritage sector and less dependence on the providers - More freedom to play around and test things out - Better open infrastructures and tools that make better internal workflows and LOD possible: - Back office tools: Collection Management Systems, DAMs , Datahubs… - Publishing online tools: Resolvers, API’s... - Reusing: Wikimedia art viewers, apps... - etc... - Vocal and demanding audience: - (examples of) reuse - curating/enriching data Wishlist
- 33. - Datahub project fase 2 en 3 - Resolver-tool op Open Summer of Code 2018 - Wikimedia projects: - Public Domain publication - Publishing images and more structured data - Reusing in Wikipedia-articles and outside of the platform - Networked cultural data - survey on the current demand for cultural heritage data by various sectors Do you see yourself contributing to one of the projects or to the wishlist? Idea’s or feedback? Please contact us! PACKED vzw 2018 -...
- 34. Thank you! Questions? Feedback? Sam Donvil Alina Saenko sam@packed.be alina@packed.be @PACKEDvzw