![42 ASHRAE Journal ashrae.org J a n u a r y 2 0 1 2
tal heat balance calculations while main-
taining simple concepts and component-
by-component results. The new method
was the result of years of ASHRAE re-
search projects.
In 2003, TC 4.1 was asked by the
ASHRAE Technical Activities Commit-
tee (umbrella group over all TCs) to de-
velop a real-world building example load
calculation for ASHRAE Handbook. The
ASHRAE headquarters building, (two sto-
ries, 30,000 ft2 [2787 m2]) was chosen as
representative of many commercial office
buildings.
To prepare that example, a series of
demonstration RTS calculation spread-
sheets were used. The spreadsheets were
updated to incorporate results of addi-
tional ASHRAE research projects (new
weather data, clear sky solar models, inte-
rior shading models, lighting heat to return
air, etc.) for the 2009 Fundamentals. The
2013 Fundamentals example will be up-
dated to incorporate the new addition and
renovation of the ASHRAE headquarters
building.
RELOCATABLE SCIF BUILDING, FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, MARYLAND
SOLICITATION NO.: W912DR-11-R-0056 07 SEPTEMBER 2011
Page 2
SECOND FLOOR PLAN
TELECOM
COLLABORATIVE/
PRINTERS
COLLABORATIVE/
PRINTERS
PRINTERS
PRINTERS
S1
S1 NCOIC
STAIR
ELEC
A COMPANY
1SG
A COMPANY
CDR
B COMPANY
CDR
D COMPANY
CDR
E COMPANY
CDR
B COMPANY
1SG
D COMPANY
1SG
E COMPANY
1SG
E STORAGE
STORAGE
STAIR
STORAGE
CSM
BATTALION
COMMANDER
EXECUTIVE
OFFICER
TECH
ADVISOR
TECH
ADVISOR
C COMPANY
CDR
C COMPANY
1SG
S2 S2 NCOIC S3 CPS
SGT
S3 S4 UMT S6 S6 NCOIC
CONFERENCE CONFERENCE
D
STORAGE
BREAK
ROOM
ELEC
DIST
STORAGEELEV
A
STORAGE
B
STORAGE
C
STORAGE
STORAGE
TRAINING
ROOM
MEN WOMEN
Figure 1 (above): Floor plan for example
building used in the RTS calculation spread-
sheet in Figure 2.
Figure 2 (right): Example RTS load calcu-
lation spreadsheet shows block load for
a modular office building. The data took
about 10 minutes to input.
Those example RTS spreadsheets (“Radiant Time Series
Method Load Calculation Spreadsheets” from the ASHRAE
bookstore) are limited in function and are intended for educa-
tional purposes, but not to be used for full-blown commercial
load calculations. While the procedures, techniques and data
included in the spreadsheets are state-of-the-art, they would
be impossibly cumbersome for use in typical projects involv-
ing hundreds or thousands of spaces. However, sometimes a
quick analysis using the spreadsheets saves time, and the fol-
lowing are a few examples.
Quick Block Load Comparisons
At the earliest stage of a project, a quick block load calcu-
lation can be useful for defining mechanical spaces and cost
modeling. This has been especially useful in the pricing phase
of design-build competitions.
Figure 1 is a floor plan issued in an RFP. Figure 2 is the RTS
spreadsheet block load for this two-story building, which took
about 10 minutes to input. What was unusual about this RFP
is the building was to be constructed of modular units that
could be disassembled and shipped to installations all over the](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/loadcalculation-160226091648/85/Load-calculation-3-320.jpg)
![www.info.hotims.com/37994-102
46 ASHRAE Journal J a n u a r y 2 0 1 2
efficient desktop and laptop computers and use of LCD
monitors. The RTS spreadsheets were used for block loads
for a common suburban office building (five stories, 25,000
ft2 [2323 m2] per floor in Atlanta) with these parameters
with results in Figure 10. The impact on overall block loads
and resulting rules of thumb has been significant over the
past 30 years.
Conclusions
Today’s complex buildings require sophisticated load cal-
culation software to account for the myriad variations in ex-
posures, construction, zoning, load densities and occupancy.
However, there are cases where a simple load calcula-
tion spreadsheet can be a time-saving, useful tool. This
is especially true in early concept stages for architectural
planning input, sizing of equipment spaces, shafts, etc.
Simple block loads are also especially helpful in devel-
oping cost models in competition phases of design-build
projects or for evaluating parameters such as location and
orientation.
Likewise, comparative studies of impact of trends due
to standards (such as 90.1 and 62.1) or assumptions (plug
loads) can be readily evaluated with a simple spreadsheet
without investing the time and energy required for a full-
blown commercial software calculation. The spreadsheets
can illustrate impacts of individual components relative to
the overall total loads, sometimes lost with more complex
tools.
Figure 10: A look back at criteria from Standards 90.1 and 62.1 that impact peak heating and cooling loads.](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/loadcalculation-160226091648/85/Load-calculation-7-320.jpg)
Load calculation
- 1. 40 ASHRAE Journal ashrae.org J a n u a r y 2 0 1 2 Most HVAC design engineers use an array of sophisticated soft- ware calculation and modeling tools for load calculations and energy analysis. These tools offer almost total flexibility for the engi- neer to define physical arrangement, thermal parameters, operating schedules, internal loads and zoning. To achieve that flexibility, the input parameters are extensive and time consuming. Especially in the early stages of a project, a large number of load assump- tions must be made. Because the sched- ule is usually tight, using sophisticated modeling tools appropriate for detailed design can be problematic. Experienced designers often fall back on their histori- cal assumptions of cfm/ft2 or ft2/ton or heating Btu/ft2 to provide initial design and budget input. An alternative approach to traditional rules of thumb is the use of simplified input spreadsheets. These have proven quick and easy to use for early concept and helpful in evaluating impact of as- sumptions vs. rules of thumb (which may not be valid with new trends in code and agency requirements). Basic Load Calculation Spreadsheets A new cooling load calculation tech- nique was introduced by ASHRAE Technical Committee (TC) 4.1, Load Calculation Data and Procedures, in 2001 ASHRAE Handbook—Funda- mentals. This method, radiant time series (RTS), effectively merged all previous “simplified” load calculation methods (TETD-TA, CLTD-CLF and transfer function). The RTS method and data were derived from fundamen- About the Author Steven F. Bruning, P.E., is a partner with New- comb & Boyd, a consulting engineering firm in Atlanta. He is a past chairman of TC 4.1, Load Calculation Data and Procedures and is the TC 4.1 Handbook subcommittee chair. By Steven F. Bruning, P.E., Fellow ASHRAE Load Calculation Spreadsheets Quick Answers Without Relying on Rules of Thumb This article was published in ASHRAE Journal, January 2012. Copyright 2012 American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc. Posted at www.ashrae.org. This article may not be copied and/or distributed electronically or in paper form without permission of ASHRAE. For more information about ASHRAE Journal, visit www.ashrae.org.
- 3. 42 ASHRAE Journal ashrae.org J a n u a r y 2 0 1 2 tal heat balance calculations while main- taining simple concepts and component- by-component results. The new method was the result of years of ASHRAE re- search projects. In 2003, TC 4.1 was asked by the ASHRAE Technical Activities Commit- tee (umbrella group over all TCs) to de- velop a real-world building example load calculation for ASHRAE Handbook. The ASHRAE headquarters building, (two sto- ries, 30,000 ft2 [2787 m2]) was chosen as representative of many commercial office buildings. To prepare that example, a series of demonstration RTS calculation spread- sheets were used. The spreadsheets were updated to incorporate results of addi- tional ASHRAE research projects (new weather data, clear sky solar models, inte- rior shading models, lighting heat to return air, etc.) for the 2009 Fundamentals. The 2013 Fundamentals example will be up- dated to incorporate the new addition and renovation of the ASHRAE headquarters building. RELOCATABLE SCIF BUILDING, FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, MARYLAND SOLICITATION NO.: W912DR-11-R-0056 07 SEPTEMBER 2011 Page 2 SECOND FLOOR PLAN TELECOM COLLABORATIVE/ PRINTERS COLLABORATIVE/ PRINTERS PRINTERS PRINTERS S1 S1 NCOIC STAIR ELEC A COMPANY 1SG A COMPANY CDR B COMPANY CDR D COMPANY CDR E COMPANY CDR B COMPANY 1SG D COMPANY 1SG E COMPANY 1SG E STORAGE STORAGE STAIR STORAGE CSM BATTALION COMMANDER EXECUTIVE OFFICER TECH ADVISOR TECH ADVISOR C COMPANY CDR C COMPANY 1SG S2 S2 NCOIC S3 CPS SGT S3 S4 UMT S6 S6 NCOIC CONFERENCE CONFERENCE D STORAGE BREAK ROOM ELEC DIST STORAGEELEV A STORAGE B STORAGE C STORAGE STORAGE TRAINING ROOM MEN WOMEN Figure 1 (above): Floor plan for example building used in the RTS calculation spread- sheet in Figure 2. Figure 2 (right): Example RTS load calcu- lation spreadsheet shows block load for a modular office building. The data took about 10 minutes to input. Those example RTS spreadsheets (“Radiant Time Series Method Load Calculation Spreadsheets” from the ASHRAE bookstore) are limited in function and are intended for educa- tional purposes, but not to be used for full-blown commercial load calculations. While the procedures, techniques and data included in the spreadsheets are state-of-the-art, they would be impossibly cumbersome for use in typical projects involv- ing hundreds or thousands of spaces. However, sometimes a quick analysis using the spreadsheets saves time, and the fol- lowing are a few examples. Quick Block Load Comparisons At the earliest stage of a project, a quick block load calcu- lation can be useful for defining mechanical spaces and cost modeling. This has been especially useful in the pricing phase of design-build competitions. Figure 1 is a floor plan issued in an RFP. Figure 2 is the RTS spreadsheet block load for this two-story building, which took about 10 minutes to input. What was unusual about this RFP is the building was to be constructed of modular units that could be disassembled and shipped to installations all over the
- 4. January 2012 ASHRAE Journal 43 world. What impact would different climates have on the heat- ing and cooling loads? Design weather data for the 5,564 worldwide locations in- cluded in the 2009 ASHRAE Handbook—Fundamentals CD+ is embedded in the RTS spreadsheet and selected with a simple drop-down menu. So, in another 20 minutes, block loads were identified for 14 locations (Figure 3). This particular building is a secure facility with no windows, so variations due to climate were mostly due to outside air conditions. For curiosity’s sake, the same block loads were run for a build- ing with 40% glass (Figure 3). This was quick because the spreadsheet includes the tabulated fenestra- tion solar heat gain coefficient data from Chapter 15 of the 2009 ASHRAE Handbook—Fundamen- tals selected in a simple drop-down box. Another useful quick evaluation is multiple identical buildings with different orientations on the same site. While the ASHRAE spreadsheet only includes four orientations (NSEW), it does include an orientation cor- rection factor that effectively allows quick “rotation” of those orientations. Figure 4 is a typical floor plan, and Figure 5 is a site plan for a multiple barracks project. How much difference did the various orientations make in the building block load? Figure 6 includes the results. In this case, this 10-minute exercise con- firmed impact on peak due to orientation for this location and particular building type. Using Spreadsheets for Zone Load Model While the RTS spreadsheets are useful for simple block load calculations, with a little front-end effort, the ASHRAE RTS Example spreadsheets can provide a tool useful in evaluating peak loads for each perimeter zone vs. block loads for each floor and the building as a whole. Again, at the early concept stage of a project, this is useful, particularly for design- build competitions and space alloca- tion input. Many buildings boil down to mostly rectangular floor plans of one or more stories. In most cases, cooling and heating loads are bro- ken into interior and perimeter zones. Using the ASHRAE RTS Example worksheets, a simple model with eight perimeter zones and one interior zone per floor can be assembled. A master input worksheet links dimensional data to the individual zone worksheets, and their results link back to a single-page summary. For buildings that fit within a simple rectangular concept, this provides a tool 5th Infantry Brigade Combat Team UEPH Barracks Ft. Stewart, Georgia • W9126G-08-D-00XX-RFP001Fort Worth District ARCHITECTURAl SITE PlAN Figure 4 (left): Typical floor plan for military barracks project. Figure 5 (right): Site plan for military barracks project. Figure 6: This shows the difference orientation makes in load for the military barracks project. Figure 3: Block loads for a secure building in 14 locations.
- 5. 44 ASHRAE Journal ashrae.org J a n u a r y 2 0 1 2 Figure 8: The front-end input required for the RTS spreadsheet for the design-build project. Figure 7: Floor plan from a design-build project. Figure 9: RTS spreadsheet results for design-build project. to quickly assess zone and overall cooling and heating loads. As an example, Figure 7 is a floor plan from a design-build RFP with pe- rimeter, corner and interior zones overlaid. Figure 8 is the front-end input re- quired for the spreadsheet and the results are in Fig- ure 9. When the impact of increasing glazing from 20% to 50% was ques- tioned, a single input was changed and total supply air increased 8% and total cooling 4.5% to 333 tons (1171 kW), a quick way to accurately respond to a cli- ent’s questions. Rules of Thumb Most engineers develop a feel for building cooling and heating capacity over years of practice, forming rules of thumb: “400/ft2 per ton,” “1 cfm/ft2,” and “25 Btu/h·ft2” heating. These rules have been fairly common for office buildings in some parts of the country. Two ASHRAE Standards: 90.1 and 62.1, have had a tremendous impact on the building industry over the past 30 years. But what kind of impact have they had on our rules of thumb? Figure 10 is a compilation of criteria from Standards 90.1 and 62.1 over the years that impact peak heating and cooling loads. Likewise, plug load trends went up during the 1980s and 1990s, but have begun to reduce due to more
- 6. With nearly 200 chapters in all, ASHRAE Handbook ONLINE covers every significant topic in HVAC&R technology. Great Value What’s the Most Powerful Way to Search All Four Current Volumes of the ASHRAE Handbook? Immediate, Searchable, Online Access to both I-P and SI Editions of All Four Current Volumes When you subscribe, you get: • Immediate access as soon as you subscribe online—no waiting. • Immediate access to all four volumes of the ASHRAE Handbook (Inch-Pound and SI editions). That’s over 3600 pages of expert-reviewed content in each set of units for use worldwide. • Immediate access anywhere you have an Internet connection—in your office—at home—on the job site. No need to carry books or CDs. Just log in wherever you are. • Powerful, flexible search. Easy, effective, and fast. • Updated content between print revisions. If an ASHRAE Technical Committee provides an update between print editions, you’ll get it right away. • Copy and print functions for your project records. Includes: 2011 ASHRAE Handbook—HVAC Applications 2010 ASHRAE Handbook—Refrigeration 2009 ASHRAE Handbook—Fundamentals 2008 ASHRAE Handbook—HVAC Systems and Equipment As an ASHRAE member, your one-year subscription for only $49 (list price: $249) gives you immediate access to all four volumes. If purchased separately, all four volumes would cost $780 plus shipping and handling. Subcribe today at http://handbook.ashrae.org Get the free app for your phone http://gettag.mobi S N A P I T ASHRAE_Han ASHRAE Handbook ONLINE Only $49 for ASHRAE Members! www.info.hotims.com/37994-248
- 7. www.info.hotims.com/37994-102 46 ASHRAE Journal J a n u a r y 2 0 1 2 efficient desktop and laptop computers and use of LCD monitors. The RTS spreadsheets were used for block loads for a common suburban office building (five stories, 25,000 ft2 [2323 m2] per floor in Atlanta) with these parameters with results in Figure 10. The impact on overall block loads and resulting rules of thumb has been significant over the past 30 years. Conclusions Today’s complex buildings require sophisticated load cal- culation software to account for the myriad variations in ex- posures, construction, zoning, load densities and occupancy. However, there are cases where a simple load calcula- tion spreadsheet can be a time-saving, useful tool. This is especially true in early concept stages for architectural planning input, sizing of equipment spaces, shafts, etc. Simple block loads are also especially helpful in devel- oping cost models in competition phases of design-build projects or for evaluating parameters such as location and orientation. Likewise, comparative studies of impact of trends due to standards (such as 90.1 and 62.1) or assumptions (plug loads) can be readily evaluated with a simple spreadsheet without investing the time and energy required for a full- blown commercial software calculation. The spreadsheets can illustrate impacts of individual components relative to the overall total loads, sometimes lost with more complex tools. Figure 10: A look back at criteria from Standards 90.1 and 62.1 that impact peak heating and cooling loads.