Masterclass01
0 likes220 views
The document discusses regulating private employment agencies that operate across borders within the EU. It notes there are an estimated 6,000-10,000 agencies currently operating with varying levels of regulation between countries. Reinstating a registration system and applying general principles at the EU level could help address issues like a lack of transparency, unfair competition, and worker exploitation. However, implementing directives uniformly across all member states poses challenges given differences in national laws and situations.
Masterclass01
- 1. Intention to reinstate a Sjoerd With enforcement conditions Feenstra registration system To pay minimal wage Other hollistic plans in progess Given magnitude of rogue Speaker European Commission Need: public cooperation agencies: are you in favour of Questions How to regulate and facilitate cross border reinstating the liscence? activities for private employment agencies. Want: regislation SNCU Topic Not possible: missing basic legalities Different systems per country Could this system be Annemarie Muntz Possible: discuss general principles on EU levell applied on EU levell Moderator Estimate 6.000 to 10.000 agencies Angelique Greiner Don´t apply CLA Anyone can Masterclass Mindmapper World of Minds Semi-legal or start a angency No taxes totally illegal Often from abroad Context NL Summary of the masterclass Rogue agencies Mindmap contains Questions asked by attendees Force back fraud&undeclared work = important Prevent unfair competition Questions Fight exploitation&abuse Clockwise Read mindmap Legenda From top to bottom Collective Labour Agreement (CLA) Provide information Targets Increase Promote and monitor correct Decrease execution CLA Same Best practice Risk Interesting model SNCU Results showing 80% questions from Polish workers Concrete results Scepticism & dissapointment 2 Polish employees Context Protection Difficulties implementing English Workers Polish End of year Website in: German Single Market Act Will allow more smooth discussion Dutch Migrant workers Full CLA applies Most work on Dutch contract 1. Principle equal treatment Temporary Agency National 2. Review of restrictions or Helpdesk Work Directive situation prohibitions Classes Offers: Housing Cross border No fixed minimal wages in EU 2500 questions answered situations 280 reports under investigation Master class 1: How to 134 court cases regulate and facilitate cross Different situations different border activities for private applicable regime €5.000.000 paid back by agencies to workers Results employment agencies Migrant Equal pay, equal work €2.000.000 compensation Different category of workers Several rogue companies bankrupt Posted Nucleus of mandatory rules Preliminary remarks Growing recogniton SNCU Minimum wages Not regulated EU Growing public/ private coorperation Side Inportance transitional arrangements Free movement Postive influence on sector effects Freedom cross border service Will have to happen locally Brussels: restrictions Posting of Garantuee protection of workers rights Best way forward: social partners deal need to be lifted Workers Directive Between service providers How to deal with Fair competition with it at national levell protectionsm Objective Links to 2020 strategy Tool: nucleus of Terms and conditions of eployment between borders? mandatory rules Art. 3(1) conditions hiring out workers Most situations are covered 6 to 7 countries have Art.3 (9) Member States guarantee terms & conditions When at same levell of the directive, pre-existing legislation Provision of services no need to change Can we implement Intercorporate transfers Some countries will never show what they impose directive across nation? Scope Hiring out by temporary/placement agency Will receive letter What will happen when Not all member state use the same When necessary, will be taken to court countries not notify imposements? Germany doesn't have statuatory Challenge minimal wagens Example: Interest: to which extend directions are being used No agenda Eager: to see results of review of prohibitions Whare are Brussels Enhance administrative cooperation Questions concerns? Implementation Obliges: to notify results of review process Protection workers Tackle outstanding issues Compliance Imposess equal treatment Enforcement Depends on Joint analysis Social partners Both directives could be the same instruments you use Clarify difference Brussels doesn't impose on members 3.1 & 3.9 Launch studies on the application who don´t have minimal wages Pathways for Call for proposals Derrigations are very clear effectiveness Ex post evaluation Future First results Feasibility study for EU platform Covers often regulations Example of non challenges Does not lead to changes member states descriptive deligations Legal study Effectiveness existing instruments Falls under posting directive 2011 EU Temporary directive: never Cannot ignore what people Example: someone from Impact assessment Brussels allow lower levell have in home country Poland working in NL Sector Hold favourable conditions Important to: Lift restrictions Countries to adopt the directive What do you want Brussels to do? Lengthy Posting of workers helps process Focus on the worst practices 2011-05-19 Ciett2011 World Employment Conference | LiveMindMapping by World of Minds, more info see: www.connectionofminds.com/ontmoet