Mgidigitalglobalization
Download as PPTX, PDF1 like720 views
The document discusses the evolution of global trade flows, indicating a decline in traditional flows of goods, services, and finance relative to GDP since 1980. It highlights the surge in cross-border data flows and the increasing significance of major online platforms, which have user bases comparable to national populations. The report further explores the connectedness index of countries, revealing that a small number of nations are significantly more integrated into global flows, suggesting potential growth opportunities for less connected countries.
Mgidigitalglobalization
- 1. McKinsey & Company | 0SOURCE: Source Digital globalization: The new era of global flows
- 2. McKinsey & Company | 1 39 37 38 4141 53 37 32 27 24 23 24 2221 23 24 26 1980 33 33 4 4 2014 28 30 29 55 32 98 66 9 29 6 12 10 24 10 5 22 1990 30 24 21 41 10 31 13 32 22 32 28 49 17 11 2007 46 2000 35 18 26 37 33 3 29 SOURCE: UNCTAD; IMF Balance of Payments; World Bank; McKinsey Global Institute analysis Goods Finance Services After 20 years of rapid growth, traditional flows of goods, services, and finance have declined relative to GDP $ trillion, nominal All flows as % of GDP -14 p.p. Flows of goods, services, and finance, 1980–2014
- 3. McKinsey & Company | 2 Used cross-border bandwidth Cross-border data flows are surging and connecting more countries 1 Estimated using public Internet bandwidth data. NOTE: Lines represent interregional bandwidth (e.g., between Europe and North America) but exclude intraregional cross-border bandwidth (e.g., connecting European nations with one another). 20051 100% = 4.7 Terabits per second (Tbps) NA United States and Canada LA Latin America AF Africa EU Europe ME Middle East OC Oceania AS Asia Regions Bandwidth Gigabits per second (Gbps) <50 50–100 100–500 500–1,000 1,000–5,000 5,000–20,000 >20,000 2014 100% = 211.3 Tbps 45x larger NA EU LA ME AF AS OC NA EU LA ME AF AS OC SOURCE: TeleGeography; McKinsey Global Institute analysis
- 4. McKinsey & Company | 3 The biggest online platforms have user bases on par with the populations of the world’s biggest countries Active users of online platforms vs. country population Million 205 256 300 300 320 321 400 407 650 1,000 1,000 1,314 1,372 1,590 Brazil Instagram Indonesia Amazon WhatsApp United States China Twitter WeChat Skype YouTube India Alibaba Facebook Countries2 Online platforms1 1 4Q15 or latest available. 2 2015 population. SOURCE: Facebook; Twitter; Alibaba; Fortune; Statista; Population Reference Bureau; McKinsey Global Institute analysis
- 5. McKinsey & Company | 4 50 30 25 201520142013 SOURCE: Facebook; McKinsey Global Institute analysis 50 million SMEs use Facebook to find customers, and 30 percent of their fans are from other countries Cross-border Domestic 70 30 Estimated number of SME pages on Facebook Million Share of SME fans that are cross-border % +41% p.a.
- 6. McKinsey & Company | 5 MGI Connectedness Index (1/2) Country connectedness index and overall flows data, 2014 Rank of participation by flow as measured by flow intensity and share of world total SOURCE: McKinsey Global Institute analysis 1 Flows value represents total goods, services, and financial inflows and outflows. 2 Flow intensity represents the total value of goods, services, and financial flows as a share of the country’s GDP. 1–10 11–25 26–50 >50Connectedness index rank 100+ <7070–99Flow intensity Rank Country Score Connectedness Index rank Flow value 1 $ billion Flow intensity 2 % of GDPGoods Services Finance People Data 1 Singapore 64.2 1 2 2 12 6 1,392 452 2 Netherlands 54.3 3 3 6 21 1 1,834 211 3 United States 52.7 7 7 3 1 7 6,832 39 4 Germany 51.9 2 4 8 3 2 3,798 99 5 Ireland 45.9 32 1 1 28 9 559 227 6 United Kingdom 40.8 13 5 5 6 3 2,336 79 7 China 34.2 4 16 4 82 38 6,480 63 8 France 30.1 11 8 9 7 4 2,262 80 9 Belgium 28.0 5 6 33 33 8 1,313 246 10 Saudi Arabia 22.6 20 28 27 2 53 790 106 11 United Arab Emirates 22.2 6 23 17 4 46 789 196 12 Switzerland 18.0 12 11 10 17 13 848 115 13 Canada 17.3 16 22 11 11 18 1,403 79 14 Russia 16.1 21 25 18 5 25 1,059 57 15 Spain 14.4 25 13 19 14 16 1,105 79 16 Korea 14.0 8 12 28 50 44 1,510 107 17 Italy 13.4 17 18 24 16 19 1,587 74 18 Sweden 13.0 29 14 22 31 5 572 100 19 Austria 11.7 26 17 31 20 12 470 108 20 Malaysia 11.6 9 19 25 26 43 610 187 21 Mexico 10.7 14 63 34 18 41 1,022 80 22 Thailand 10.7 10 15 36 44 64 605 162 23 Kuwait 10.6 37 46 13 13 75 306 153 24 Japan 10.5 15 20 12 81 20 2,498 54 25 Kazakhstan 10.0 48 73 41 8 57 176 83 26 Ukraine 9.8 38 39 87 10 34 133 101
- 7. McKinsey & Company | 6 MGI Connectedness Index (2/2) Country connectedness index and overall flows data, 2014 Rank of participation by flow as measured by flow intensity and share of world total SOURCE: McKinsey Global Institute analysis 1 Flows value represents total goods, services, and financial inflows and outflows. 2 Flow intensity represents the total value of goods, services, and financial flows as a share of the country’s GDP. 1–10 11–25 26–50 >50Connectedness index rank 100+ <7070–99Flow intensity Rank Country Score Connectedness Index rank Flow value 1 $ billion Flow intensity 2 % of GDPGoods Services Finance People Data 27 Australia 9.7 30 34 21 15 33 825 57 28 Denmark 8.9 35 9 32 41 11 369 108 29 Jordan 8.8 73 50 75 9 83 50 138 30 India 8.5 24 10 35 58 70 1,316 64 32 Czech Republic 7.5 18 33 57 59 15 397 193 34 Poland 7.0 23 31 47 34 22 585 107 35 Hungary 6.8 22 30 26 62 17 287 209 36 Norway 6.0 36 24 20 46 24 458 92 37 Vietnam 5.7 19 54 45 103 61 350 188 39 Finland 5.5 46 27 23 70 10 390 144 40 Portugal 5.5 47 36 30 23 31 255 111 41 Turkey 5.1 28 40 53 38 29 521 65 43 Israel 4.9 51 32 49 24 56 248 82 44 Brazil 4.5 41 38 14 125 30 869 37 45 Chile 4.1 45 58 16 102 27 239 92 47 Greece 4.1 60 29 54 35 42 160 67 48 New Zealand 3.9 67 48 61 25 51 130 63 51 Indonesia 3.4 31 49 38 106 76 504 57 53 South Africa 3.3 34 57 52 64 80 277 79 54 Philippines 3.2 54 41 44 52 67 230 81 64 Morocco 2.6 58 43 74 56 65 104 97 73 Egypt 2.2 68 42 69 73 71 158 55 83 Nigeria 1.9 55 76 48 128 98 268 47 86 Peru 1.8 62 88 51 104 49 122 60 118 Kenya 1.3 100 84 127 119 91 35 58
- 8. McKinsey & Company | 7 A small group of leading countries are much more connected than the rest of the world 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 600 10 8020 70504030 140 Greece Kuwait FinlandCzech Republic QatarDenmark Connectedness score, 2014 Ukraine Portugal Per capita GDP, 2014 $ thousand, purchasing power parity, current international dollar Spain Singapore Sweden Netherlands Japan Belgium Germany Austria Turkey Saudi Arabia Indonesia Ireland Switzerland Italy India Russia Canada France South Korea United Kingdom United Arab Emirates Norway Australia Mexico China United States DevelopedEmerging Correlation coefficient (r) = 0.54 Size of circle represents $ value of flows in 2014 SOURCE: IMF; McKinsey Global Institute analysis Vietnam Brazil Thailand Malaysia
- 9. McKinsey & Company | 8 Lagging countries could realize enormous growth potential by increasing their participation in global flows SOURCE: McKinsey Global Institute analysis Output gap % of GDP >75 51–75 26–50 1–25 <1 No data
- 10. McKinsey & Company | 9 GOODS FLOWS SOURCE: UNCTAD; McKinsey Global Institute analysis NA United States and Canada LA Latin America AF Africa EE Eastern Europe and Central Asia ME Middle East OA Other Asia CH China region WE Western Europe AU Australasia NE Northeast Asia 1980 100% = $1.8 trillion (18.6% of GDP) NA WE LA ME AF CH AU EE NE OA 10.5x larger2014 100% = $19 trillion (24.6% of GDP) NA WE LA ME AF CH AU EE NE OA NOTE: For cross-border data flows, see Executive summary. % of global GDP 0.02–0.05 0.05–0.10 0.10–0.25 0.25–0.50 0.50–1.00 >1.00
- 11. McKinsey & Company | 10 SERVICES FLOWS SOURCE: UNCTAD; McKinsey Global Institute analysis 1 Estimated from 2011 bilateral services flows data and 2014 services trade data from UNCTAD. NOTE: For cross-border data flows, see Executive summary. NA United States, Canada, and Mexico LA Latin America AF Africa EE Eastern Europe and Central Asia ME Middle East OA Other Asia CH China region WE Western Europe AU Australasia NE Northeast Asia 2002 100% = $1.6 trillion (4.9% of GDP) NA WE LA ME AF CH AU EE NE OA 3.1x larger20141 100% = $4.9 trillion (6.4% of GDP) NA WE LA ME AF CH AU EE NE OA % of global GDP 0.01–0.05 0.05–0.10 0.10–0.25 0.25–0.50 >0.50
- 12. McKinsey & Company | 11 FINANCIAL FLOWS (FDI)1 SOURCE: IMF CDIS; McKinsey Global Institute analysis 1 Estimated from bilateral FDI stock data. NOTE: For cross-border data flows, see Exhibit E2. % of global GDP 0.02–0.05 0.05–0.10 0.10–0.25 0.25–0.50 0.50–1.00 >1.00 NA United States, Canada, and Mexico LA Latin America AF Africa EE Eastern Europe and Central Asia ME Middle East OA Other Asia CH China region WE Western Europe AU Australasia NE Northeast Asia 2002 100% = $0.7 trillion (2.1% of GDP) NA WE LA ME AF CH AU EE NE OA 2.3x larger2014 100% = $1.65 trillion (2.1% of GDP) NA WE LA ME AF CH AU EE NE OA
- 13. McKinsey & Company | 12 PEOPLE FLOWS SOURCE: UN World Tourism Organization; McKinsey Global Institute analysis NA United States and Canada LA Latin America AF Africa EE Eastern Europe and Central Asia ME Middle East OA Other Asia CH China region WE Western Europe AU Australasia NE Northeast Asia Million cross-border travelers <1 1–5 5–10 10–50 >50 2002 100% = 650 million NA WE LA ME AF CH AU EE NE OA 1.6x larger2013 100% = 1.03 billion NA WE LA ME AF CH AU EE NE OA
- 14. McKinsey & Company | 13 24.6 26.1 21.7 26.6 20.1 13.8 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 201490 -2.0 10 Global goods trade, 1980–2014 % of GDP 052000951985 After decades of steady growth relative to GDP, trade in goods has been declining since its post-recession rebound SOURCE: UNCTAD; McKinsey Global Institute analysis 2.0 Global trade $ trillion GDP growth rate % 1995–2005 2005–141985–95 10.63.5 5.2 6.5 15.4 19.0 7.5 6.710.1
- 15. McKinsey & Company | 14 The commodities slump partly explains the loss of momentum in goods trade, but finished and intermediate goods have declined as well SOURCE: IHS; UNCTAD; McKinsey Global Institute analysis Value of goods trade, 2002–14 % of world GDP 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 20142002 -1.1 08 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 082002 -0.4 2014 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 -0.5 2014082002 Processed and raw materials Intermediate goods Finished goods Trade value $ trillion 4.6 6.1 8.5
- 16. McKinsey & Company | 15SOURCE: IHS; McKinsey Global Institute analysis -72 -13 -8 -16 Steel products Textile fabrics Chemicals -10 Paper -11Fertilizers Communications equipment -8Electrical equipment Other increasing categories Total increasing Pharmaceutical inputs 33 Vehicle parts Aircraft parts 75 38 Total declining 201 38 -212 Telephones, microphones, etc. Other declining categories -67 Office machines -7 16 Trade has declined in half of intermediate goods categories, reflecting shorter global value chains 47% of categories have posted trade declines since 2011 53% of categories have posted trade increases since 2011 but grew more slowly than GDP 3.5 13.0 3.5 2.2 13.0 2.8 1.2 1.8 1.2 2.0 0.6 2.3 22.0 Change in trade in categories of intermediate goods products, 2011–14 $ billion % of intermediate goods trade, 2014 Declining categories Increasing categories 31.0 NOTE: Numbers may not sum due to rounding.
- 17. McKinsey & Company | 16 SOURCE: IMF Balance of Payments; Economist Intelligence Unit; Bank for International Settlements; Institute of International Finance; McKinsey Global Institute analysis 1 Includes foreign direct investment, purchases of foreign bonds and equities, and cross-border loans and deposits. 2 Includes trade credits, loans, currency, and deposits. NOTE: Numbers may not sum due to rounding. Cross-border lending accounts for 70 percent of the drop in global financial flows, reflecting new banking regulation 6.8 20.7 12.2 4.5 4.1 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 2014E2000 -14 p.p. 200719901980 5.7 2.6 1.7 2.7 1.6 0.9 1.0 0.9 2014 FDI Equity 5.2 Bonds Loans2 -6.7 2007 11.9 2 -7 -6 -23 Compound annual growth rate, 2007–14 % Global cross-border capital inflows-to-GDP ratio1 % Global capital inflows by type $ trillion
- 18. McKinsey & Company | 17 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 90 10 20142000951980 0585 1.6 4.4 1.5 4.2 1.7 People flows across borders Index: 100 = 1980 Compound annual growth rate % 1980–90 1990–2000 2000–10 2010–14 7.5 -3.5 -1.4Refugees 8.0 1.7 8.7 3.0Students 3.8 1.8 1.4 1.2World population 1.2 4.7 4.6 3.8Travelers 4.9 0.2 2.1 2.9Migrants 4.4 All types of people flows are outpacing global population growth Refugees Students1 World population Travelers Migrants1 Major change 1980–2014 1 Latest data available is 2012 for students and 2013 for migrants; 2012–13 growth was used for linear extrapolation to 2014. SOURCE: OECD; World Bank; UN World Tourism Organization; UN High Commissioner on Refugees; UN Population Division; McKinsey Global Institute analysis
- 19. McKinsey & Company | 18 16E13 147 543 12 4630 2021E20E 1,397 211 2005 1,020 11 17E14 744 15E 1,914 18E 397 290 101 11 70 100908 19 06 7 07 5 19E SOURCE: TeleGeography; McKinsey Global Institute analysis Used cross-border bandwidth, global Terabits per second Cross-border bandwidth has grown 45 times larger over the past decade— and may grow another nine times larger by 2021 Actual Forecast 45x >9x
- 20. McKinsey & Company | 19 16 6 12 4 19 43 SOURCE: Cisco; McKinsey Global Institute analysis By 2019, machine-to-machine connections are expected to account for more than 40 percent of global devices and connections Connections, 2019 TabletsTVsSmartphones OtherPCsMachine-to-machine (M2M) 33 22 0 19 23 3 Global devices and connections Global IP traffic by devices 100% = 25 billion 100% = 168 exabytes per month
- 21. McKinsey & Company | 20SOURCE: Facebook; Twitter; Freelancer; Upwork; Mashable; Fortune; Statista; McKinsey Global Institute analysis Active users on select platforms, 4Q15 or latest available Million Digital platforms are connecting billions of people around the world YouTube WeChat AlibabaWhatsAppFacebook 1,000 6501,0001,590 Instagram Twitter Skype Amazon PayPal eBay LinkedIn 400 320 300 300 179 162 100 407
- 22. McKinsey & Company | 21 By 2020, some 940 million online shoppers are expected to spend almost $1 trillion on cross-border e-commerce transactions SOURCE: AliResearch; McKinsey Global Institute analysis 3.4 2020E 0.3 18E 1.8 19E 3.1 2.2 2.5 15 16E 2.4 1.9 1.0 2.1 0.7 2.2 1.9 0.5 0.4 2.8 0.8 1.6 17E 1.6 1.4 0.2 2014 1.2 1.9 1.2 1.2 17E 0.9 19E 1.0 18E16E 1.2 2.0 1.2 2.1 2020E 0.8 1.8 0.5 1.6 15 0.71.5 0.6 1.1 0.4 2014 1.3 0.3 Global B2C e-commerce shoppers Billion Global B2C e-commerce transaction volume $ trillion Cross- border % of total +27% p.a. +21% p.a. NOTE: Numbers may not sum due to rounding. 15 16 18 21 24 27 29 23 25 28 33 37 42 45 Cross-border Domestic Forecast
- 23. McKinsey & Company | 22 Online traffic from outside country of origin as share of total traffic1 Digital media is attracting global audiences SOURCE: Similar Web; McKinsey Global Institute analysis 1 Based on monthly site traffic data from Similar Web. October 2015 October 2013 91 77 73 27 40 27 29 24 22 24 21 22 Time Vogue Yahoo Sports Netflix BBC News 92 Business Week Buzzfeed Wall Street Journal The Economist Financial Times 41 56 25 41 60 50 33 39 61 75 78 New York Times The Guardian
- 24. McKinsey & Company | 23 35 65People2 While much of the world’s trade in goods is long distance, roughly half or more of other global flows move within the same region Distribution of flows between intraregional (short haul) vs. interregional (long haul), 20141 % of world flow SOURCE: UNCTAD; UN World Tourism Organization; TeleGeography; IMF; McKinsey Global Institute analysis 1 For goods, services, FDI, and travelers we have divided the world into 10 regions; for data flows we have used TeleGeography’s 6 regions. 2 Distribution of services flows for 2014 estimated based on 2011 data; 2013 bilateral traveler data used for people flows. NOTE: Numbers may not sum due to rounding. 64 36 Short haul (intraregional) Long haul (interregional) 53 47 46 54 33 67 Goods Services2 FDI Data
- 25. McKinsey & Company | 24 China, the United States, or Germany is the major trading partner for most countries SOURCE: UNCTAD; McKinsey Global Institute analysis Largest trading partner in goods (exports and imports combined), 2014 NOTE: Data omitted for some small nations as indicated in gray.
- 26. McKinsey & Company | 25 88 66 56 51 36 10 16 32 17 61 18 12 32Asia Pacific Europe 3 Africa 2 Latin America United States and Canada SOURCE: TeleGeography; Pingdom; McKinsey Global Institute analysis Content host 31 4212 15 100% = 1 million websites Asia Pacific OtherUnited States1 Europe The United States is the largest producer of digital content for Internet users across the globe Location of top 100 websites requested by users % by user region, as of April 2015 Hosting location of top 1 million websites, 20132 % 1 Includes United States and Canada for location of top 100 websites requested by users. 2 Based on Pingdom analysis of Alexa top 1 million websites.
- 27. McKinsey & Company | 26 Share of eBay commercial sellers1 and offline enterprises that export, 2014 % eBay enables SMEs to attain global reach that comparable offline businesses have not achieved SOURCE: eBay; World Bank Enterprise Surveys (using latest data available); McKinsey Global Institute analysis 100100100100 95 100 18 14 8 3 10 22 India Indonesia MexicoChina Brazil South Africa 100 9697 20 16 4 South Korea GermanyUnited States Emerging economies Advanced economies eBay sellers All enterprises 1 eBay commercial sellers are defined as sellers with sales of over $10,000 and at least 10 transactions in previous year.
- 28. McKinsey & Company | 27SOURCE: MGI Global Startup Survey 2015; McKinsey Global Institute analysis 14 36 36 39 47 62 Inputs sourced from other countries (e.g., parts, cloud services) Mentors or advisers in other countries Accelerator or incubator in other countries Funding or investors from other countries Talent (including freelancers) hired from other countries Customers, clients, or users in other countries 86 percent of the tech-enabled startups surveyed by MGI engage in at least one cross-border activity Share of startup respondents engaged in cross-border activity % Participation by activity type % 100% = 271 respondents 18 >1 21 20 6 13 14 7 None Average = 2.4 86% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Number of cross- border activities
- 29. McKinsey & Company | 28SOURCE: MGI Global Startup Survey 2015; McKinsey Global Institute analysis 1 The difference in participation rates between developed and emerging startups is statistically significant. P-values for inputs (p = 0.005), incubator/accelerator (p = 0.05), and customers (p = 0.07) are significant at the 0.07 level and below. 2 Emerging economies represented in the survey are Argentina, Armenia, Brazil, China, Colombia, Cyprus, Egypt, Estonia, Hungary, India, Israel, Jordan, Kenya, Mexico, Moldova, Pakistan, Poland, Russia, South Africa, and Ukraine. Advanced economies represented in the survey are Australia, Canada, Germany, Ireland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Tech-based startups from emerging economies were more likely than other survey respondents to report seeking out customers and inputs from abroad Share of startups participating by activity type1 %, 100% = 271 respondents Customers, clients, or users in other countries 77 54 Inputs (e.g., cloud services) sourced from other countries 45 32 Participation in foreign accelerator or incubator 17 12 Emerging2 Advanced2
- 30. McKinsey & Company | 29 Individuals are participating in globalization, and 914 million have cross- border social media connections SOURCE: Facebook; AliResearch; US Department of Commerce; OECD; World Bank; McKinsey Global Institute analysis Students studying abroad 5 million Cross-border e-commerce shoppers 361 million International travelers 429 million People living outside home country 244 million Cross-border online students 13 million Cross-border online workers 44 million Social networking users with at least one foreign connection 914 million NOTE: Numbers adjusted to account for overlap between platforms and for individuals making multiple international trips in the same year.
- 31. McKinsey & Company | 30 The share of Facebook users with at least one international friend tripled in just three years, with the fastest growth in emerging economies SOURCE: Facebook; World Bank; UNCTAD; McKinsey Global Institute analysis % of monthly active Facebook users with at least one international friend1 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 +35 p.p. 14 2015132012 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 13 20152012 14 +40 p.p. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 13 2015 +26 p.p. 142012 World Emerging economies Advanced economies 1 Weighted by number of Internet users to arrive at world average and averages for emerging and advanced economies.
- 32. McKinsey & Company | 31 0 80 40 20 100 60 0807 10 China-North China-South Other South-South 201413090302 0401 05 Other South-North 1211062000 North-North 7x 20x 8x 3x 2x Change in value of trade, 2000–14 SOURCE: UNCTAD; McKinsey Global Institute analysis Emerging economies are now involved in more than half of the world’s goods trade Bilateral goods trade by development status, 2000–14 % of total goods trade
- 33. McKinsey & Company | 32 13 21 66 63 23 14 22 65 13 14 23 62 4 17 79 79 5 16 11 86 2 77 7 16 SOURCE: UNCTAD; IMF; TeleGeography; McKinsey Global Institute analysis Flows remain concentrated among a few leading countries, with little change since 2005 % of world total Global goods flow distribution 2005 2014 Global services flow distribution 2005 2014 Global FDI flow distribution 2005 2014 Global data flow distribution 2005 2014 1 Tbps = terabits per second. NOTE: Numbers may not sum due to rounding. Next 20 countriesTop 15 countries All others $10.6 trillion $19.0 trillion $2.5 trillion $4.9 trillion $1.39 trillion $1.63 trillion 4.8 Tbps1 211 Tbps1
- 34. McKinsey & Company | 33 Only eight of the world’s major cities are hubs for at least four of the five major flows SOURCE: Lloyd’s List; Containerisation International; Airports Council International; Global Financial Centers Index; Migration Policy Institute; TeleGeography; McKinsey Global Institute analysis City participation in major flows by rank and change over previous year in each flow1 1 Metropolitan areas with at least 1 million foreign-born residents. Exact foreign-born population of Jeddah not known, so it is included at the bottom of the list. 2 Rankings come from different years: ports (2014), airports (2014), financial centers (2014), migration (2011), and online traffic (2015). Rank2 Goods Goods, services, people Financial People Data and communication 1 Shanghai Atlanta London New York Frankfurt 2 Singapore Beijing New York Los Angeles London 3 Shenzhen London Hong Kong London Amsterdam 4 Hong Kong Tokyo Singapore Hong Kong Paris 5 Ningbo Los Angeles Tokyo Toronto New York 6 Busan Dubai Seoul Paris Los Angeles 7 Guangzhou Chicago Zurich Miami Miami 8 Qingdao Paris Toronto Sydney Stockholm 9 Dubai Dallas/Fort Worth San Francisco Chicago San Francisco 10 Tianjin Hong Kong Washington, DC Singapore Singapore 11 Rotterdam Frankfurt Chicago San Francisco Hong Kong 12 Port Klang Jakarta Boston Melbourne Tokyo 13 Kaohsiung Istanbul Geneva Moscow Moscow 14 Dalian Amsterdam Frankfurt Houston Milan 15 Hamburg Guangzhou Sydney Dubai Vienna 16 Antwerp Singapore Dubai Riyadh Washington, DC 17 Xiamen Denver Montreal Washington, DC Hamburg 18 Tanjung Pelepas New York Vancouver Dallas Beijing 19 Los Angeles Shanghai Luxembourg Jeddah Marseille 20 Long Beach Kuala Lumpur Osaka Copenhagen 21 Laem Chabang San Francisco Shanghai Brussels 22 Tanjung Priok Bangkok Qatar Warsaw 23 Ho Chi Minh City Incheon Shenzhen Shanghai 24 Bremen Charlotte Busan São Paulo 25 New York Las Vegas Tel Aviv Madrid
- 35. McKinsey & Company | 34 Within countries, regional connectedness varies greatly Regional goods trade connectivity score, 2014 Higher number indicates greater connectedness 0–10.0 10.1–20.0 20.1–40.0 40.1–100.0 SOURCE: McKinsey Global Institute analysis NOTE: Countries not to scale. China Guangdong Shanghai Beijing Jiangsu Zhejiang United Kingdom West Midlands East of England South East Germany Hamburg Niedersachsen North Rhine- Westphalia Baden- Württemberg Bavaria United States California Texas
- 36. McKinsey & Company | 35 11.2 13.8 14.6 14.7 15.4 16.2 16.3 16.5 16.7 16.7 16.7 18.4 19.7 20.8 23.6 23.7 24.4 24.5 24.5 25.0 25.8 28.4 28.4 28.6 29.6 30.0 44.1 45.9 46.9 51.3 78.4 87.8 90.9 92.6 100.0 Hungary Mexico Czech Republic Russia Canada Saudi Arabia Japan Beijing (China)1 Italy United Kingdom Vietnam Shanghai (China)1 France Switzerland Thailand Baden-Württemberg (Germany) Bavaria (Germany) India Slovak Republic Jiangsu (China) Spain North Rhine-Westphalia (Germany) Texas (United States) Austria Poland Guangdong (China) Singapore South Korea Malaysia China Germany Belgium United Arab Emirates Netherlands United States If states and provinces are ranked among countries, Guangdong would be sixth globally in goods flows and California would rank fourth in people flows Connectedness index score, goods and people flows, 2014 Goods People SOURCE: McKinsey Global Institute analysis 10.9 11.4 11.5 11.5 12.0 12.3 12.3 12.6 12.7 12.9 13.6 14.8 17.0 18.3 21.4 21.5 22.3 24.4 25.6 26.6 30.6 31.4 33.7 35.1 36.7 37.0 39.9 40.8 43.3 44.1 45.7 49.9 51.2 81.7 100.0 Croatia Belarus North Rhine-Westphalia (Germany) London (United Kingdom)1 Ireland Israel Florida (United States) Texas (United States) Malaysia New Zealand Portugal Lebanon Mexico Switzerland Qatar Jordan Australia Canada Netherlands New York State (United States) Kuwait Singapore Austria Italy Spain Ukraine California (United States) United States Kazakhstan Russia United Kingdom United Arab Emirates Saudi Arabia Germany France State/region Country 1 Metropolitan areas considered as states/province by national authorities.
- 37. McKinsey & Company | 36 Some European countries trade predominantly with their neighbors Intraregional goods trade in Europe (includes imports and exports), 20141 % share of total trade 1 Includes EU-28 and select Western European countries including Andorra, Iceland, Norway, and Switzerland. SOURCE: UNCTAD; McKinsey Global Institute analysis 40–50 50–60 60–70 70+ Portugal Iceland Lithuania Latvia Estonia Finland Sweden Norway Denmark United Kingdom NetherlandsIreland Germany Poland Belgium Luxembourg Italy France SwitzerlandSpain Greece Malta Cyprus Czech Republic Austria Hungary Bulgaria Romania Croatia Slovak Republic
- 38. McKinsey & Company | 37 15 24 61 42 45 13 SOURCE: UNCTAD; IMF; McKinsey Global Institute analysis The EU is the most integrated of the world’s major trading blocs Trade within and outside of trading blocs, 2014 % share of total goods trade Intraregional Extra-regional (excluding China) China 6 34 61 NAFTAEU-28 73 10 17 ASEAN EAC (East African Community)1 100% = $5.6 trillion 100% = $11.8 trillion 100% = $2.5 trillion 100% = $0.05 trillion 1 Comprises Burundi, Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania, and Uganda. NOTE: Numbers may not sum due to rounding.
- 39. McKinsey & Company | 38 Short-/long-term impact Name of variable Granger causality with real GDP Expected sign of coefficient Estimated sign of coefficient FDI Two-way Positive/positive Positive/positive Goods trade flow Two-way Positive/positive Positive/positive Immigration Two-way Positive/positive Insignificant/negative1 Data flows Two-way Positive/positive Positive/positive Services trade flow Two-way Positive/positive Extended due to correlation with FDI Fixed capital stock n/a Positive/positive Positive/positive Employment n/a Positive/positive Positive/positive Average years of education n/a Positive/positive Insignificant/negative SOURCE: McKinsey Global Institute analysis The coefficients from our econometric model have the expected sign Flow variables Dependent variable (Log) Real GDP Independent variables (Log) 1 Migration flows are negligible or slightly negative at the global level, possibly due to the loss of skilled labor in developing countries or the difficulties of absorbing a large influx of refugees or migrants. However, migration flows have a positive impact on productivity in advanced economies.
- 40. McKinsey & Company | 39 Our econometric model shows that global flows account for approximately 10 percent of global GDP output 3.5 3.0 2.0 1.6 10.1All flows FDI Migration2 Data flows Goods trade SOURCE: McKinsey Global Institute analysis 1 Includes inflows and outflows data for 139 countries in MGI Global Flows model; see technical appendix for more details. 2 Global migration flows declined slightly from 2003 to 2013, resulting in a positive impact despite a negative coefficient. Migration flows are negligible or slightly negative at the global level, possibly due to the loss of skilled labor in developing countries or the difficulties of absorbing a large influx of refugees or migrants. However, migration flows have a positive impact on productivity in advanced economies. NOTE: Numbers may not sum due to rounding. Impact on GDP, 20141 $ trillion Long-term impact on level of GDP1 %
- 41. McKinsey & Company | 40SOURCE: McKinsey Global Institute analysis Cross-border implications of digitization Flow type Data Goods Services Finance FDI Remote monitoring Remote tracking Remote maintenance Supply-chain management Remote inventory management Supplier management Access to global markets Cross-border access to customers Cross-border access to labor Cross-border access to finance Business operations and strategy Centralized back-office operations Cross-border digital payments Real-time communications and collaboration Data sharing and analytics-driven decision making Digitization is transforming business models in ways that enable more cross-border activity
- 42. McKinsey & Company | 41 Hollywood releases illustrate the growing trend toward simultaneous global launches SOURCE: IMDB.com; boxofficemojo.com; McKinsey Global Institute analysis Simultaneous release of highest-grossing Hollywood movies in multiple countries1 1 Within 10 days of release data; excludes movie premieres. Highest-grossing movies in their respective years. 2 Rounded. Total number of countries in which movie was released2 1990 1 30 1995 3 30 2000 5 60 2005 43 65 2015 80 80 2012 80 70
- 43. McKinsey & Company | 42 By 2025, emerging regions are expected to be home to almost 230 companies in the Fortune Global 500, up from 85 in 2010 Number of Fortune Global 500 companies1 SOURCE: MGI CompanyScope; McKinsey Global Institute analysis 1 The Fortune Global 500 is an annual ranking of the top 500 companies worldwide by gross revenue in US dollars. 2 All emerging regions with the exceptions of China and Latin America combined until 2000. 3 Fortune Global 500 share in 2025 projected from revenue share of countries in 2025. NOTE: Numbers may not sum due to rounding. 54 120 26 12 34 10 1513 11 12 26 477 82 South Asia 6 476 1990 2000 477 1 6 7 1980 8 415 2010 Developed regions Latin America China 2025E3 4 Africa Other emerging28 Southeast Asia 271 Total in emerging regions Emerging regions 23 23 24 85 229 1
- 44. McKinsey & Company | 43 The compiled data set contains up to 250+ countries and provides comprehensive coverage of the past decade World Bank UNWTO 221Travelers Migrants 273EWN1Total financial stock 185 214 194 Labor-intensive services 146 Knowledge-intensive services UNCTAD Capital-intensive services UNCTAD UNCTAD UNCTAD 160R&D-intensive goods Government services UNCTAD 160 160 104 Total financial flows 138 Cultural and social services IMF Reserves 146 FDI flow UNCTAD UNCTAD UNCTAD 135 181Services total 160Primary resources Labor-intensive goods Capital-intensive goods UNCTAD 218UNCTADGoods total IMF 112 IMF Bonds 113 260 125IMF Portfolio investment 251 Equity IMF 265 World Bank IMFLoans IMF Remittance International students Maximum number of countriesMajor flows TeleGeography 201 171 OECD Source Used bandwidth UNCTAD Goods Services Finance People Data SOURCE: McKinsey Global Institute analysis 1 External Wealth of Nations database. 88 90 95 1505 1000
- 45. McKinsey & Company | 44 Classification of countries into regions and development level SOURCE: McKinsey Global Institute Financial Assets database; McKinsey Global Institute analysis 1 Combined to form “Other Asia” in analysis regarding interregional vs. intraregional trade. 2 Classified as developed despite being located in a region classified as emerging. Developed regions Emerging regions Europe, Middle East, and Africa Western Europe ▪ Austria ▪ Belgium ▪ Denmark ▪ Finland ▪ France ▪ Germany ▪ Greece ▪ Iceland ▪ Ireland ▪ Italy ▪ Malta ▪ Netherlands ▪ Norway ▪ Portugal ▪ Spain ▪ Sweden ▪ Switzerland ▪ United Kingdom Eastern Europe and Central Asia ▪ Bulgaria ▪ Czech Republic ▪ Hungary ▪ Kazakhstan ▪ Lithuania ▪ Latvia ▪ Poland ▪ Russia ▪ Slovakia ▪ Turkey Plus 19 other countries Africa and Middle East ▪ Algeria ▪ Angola ▪ Botswana ▪ Cameroon ▪ Egypt ▪ Ghana ▪ Iran ▪ Israel ▪ Jordan ▪ Kenya ▪ Kuwait ▪ Lebanon ▪ Morocco ▪ Nigeria ▪ Saudi Arabia ▪ South Africa ▪ Tunisia ▪ United Arab Emirates Plus 26 other countries Americas North America ▪ Canada ▪ United States Latin America ▪ Argentina ▪ Bolivia ▪ Brazil ▪ Chile ▪ Colombia ▪ Costa Rica ▪ Dominican Republic ▪ Ecuador ▪ Guatemala ▪ Jamaica ▪ Mexico ▪ Panama ▪ Uruguay ▪ Venezuela Plus 10 other countries Asia Northeast Asia ▪ Japan ▪ South Korea Australasia ▪ Australia ▪ New Zealand China region ▪ China South Asia1 ▪ India ▪ Pakistan ▪ Bangladesh ▪ Sri Lanka ▪ Maldives Southeast Asia1 ▪ Philippines ▪ Malaysia ▪ Cambodia ▪ Indonesia ▪ Thailand ▪ Vietnam ▪ Singapore2 Plus 5 other countries
- 46. McKinsey & Company | 45 GDP impact of global flows, using normalized flow values SOURCE: McKinsey Global Institute analysis Elasticities Long term Short term Coefficients P-values Coefficients P-values Flow variables Flow variables Goods trade 0.05 0.0129 Goods trade 0.0817 0.0002 FDI 0.04 0 FDI 0.0039 0.0761 Migration -0.05 0.0036 Immigration Insignificant n/a Data 0.02 0 Data usage 0.025 0.0154 Macroeconomic variables Macroeconomic variables Fixed capital stock 0.48 0 Fixed capital stock 0.76 0 Employment 0.39 0 Employment 0.49 0 Average years of education Insignificant n/a Average years of education Not available n/a Dependent variable: Real GDP 97 countries, 1995–2013
- 47. McKinsey & Company | 46 GDP impact of global flows, using connectedness scores for each flow SOURCE: McKinsey Global Institute analysis Elasticities Long term Short term Coefficients P-values Coefficients P-values Connectedness scores Internet traffic 0.0180 0.1202 Insignificant n/a Goods trade 0.0706 0.0006 0.4264 0.0022 Service trade1 0.0249 0.0498 Insignificant n/a Travelers 0.0399 0.0407 Insignificant n/a FDI flow 0.0204 0.0444 Insignificant n/a Macroeconomic variables Fixed capital stock 0.4718 0 0.70 0 Employment 0.4685 0 0.48 0 Average years of education Insignificant n/a n/a n/a Dependent variable: Real GDP 97 countries, 1995–2013 1 We use data on labor-intensive services trade only, not knowledge-intensive services or capital-intensive services, because the latter are highly correlated with FDI.
- 48. McKinsey & Company | 47 All flows combined contributed 10.1 percent of GDP from 2003 to 2013, with goods and data having the largest impact SOURCE: McKinsey Global Institute analysis Flows contribution to GDP FLOWS MODEL—ALL COUNTRIES Shares of output % Midpoint 5th percentile 95th percentile 2008–13 2003–13 1998–2013 2008–13 2003–13 1998–2013 2008–13 2003–13 1998–2013 All flows 9.36 10.05 11.03 8.97 9.62 10.55 10.06 10.82 11.90 Goods trade 3.20 3.51 3.97 3.28 3.56 4.03 3.21 3.46 3.91 FDI flow 1.68 1.64 1.52 1.74 1.70 1.58 1.62 1.58 1.46 Immigration 1.74 1.95 2.24 1.16 1.30 1.50 2.61 2.92 3.36 Data flow 2.70 2.95 3.29 2.79 3.06 3.43 2.62 2.85 3.17
- 49. McKinsey & Company | 48 All flows contribute to raising productivity, but only data flows contribute to increasing labor and capital inputs SOURCE: McKinsey Global Institute analysis Flows model Flow variables Long-term elasticity for real GDP Impact on productivity Impact on increased inputs Goods trade 0.05 0.05 0 FDI 0.04 0.05 -0.0023 Migration -0.05 -0.04 -0.0101 Data usage 0.02 0.02 0.0029
- 50. McKinsey & Company | 49 The MGI Connectedness Index measures five types of inflows and outflows, unlike other studies (1/2) SOURCE: McKinsey Global Institute analysis Dimension variables (variable weight) Percentage weight in overall index XX MGI DHL/Ghemawat E&Y/EIU KDF Overview 139 countries in 2014 1980–2014 5 dimensions: goods, services, finance, people, and data 140 countries in 2014 2012–14 5 dimensions: goods, services, finance, people, and data and communications 60 countries in 2012 2009–12 6 dimensions: goods, services, finance, people, data and communications, and culture 187 countries in 2015 1970–2015 7 dimensions: goods, services, finance, people, data and communications, culture, and political globalization Dimensions Goods 20 Total goods flows (100%) 35 Total goods flows (75%) 22 Total goods and services flows (40%) Trade openness1 barriers (10%) Tariff and non-tariff1 barriers (10%) Ease of trading1 (10%) Current account restrictions (10%) Share of main trading partners in total trade (20%) 36 Total goods and services flows (11%) Hidden trade barriers (12%) Mean tariff (14%) Taxes on international trade (13%) Services 20 Total goods flows (100%) Total service trade (25%) Financial 20 FDI flows (40%) Portfolio investment flows (10%) Bank and other flows (10%) Foreign investment assets and liabilities (40%) FDI stocks (25%) FDI flow (25%) Portfolio equity stock (25%) Portfolio equity flows (25%) FDI stock (50%) Portfolio capital flows (8%) Policy toward FDI1 (8%) Domestic favoritism1 (8%) Expropriation risk (8%) State control (8%) FDI stocks (13%) Portfolio investment stocks (12%) Income payments to foreign nationals/GDP flows (13%) Restrictions on capital account (11%)
- 51. McKinsey & Company | 50 The MGI Connectedness Index measures five types of inflows and outflows, unlike other studies (2/2) SOURCE: McKinsey Global Institute analysis MGI DHL/Ghemawat E&Y/EIU KDF Overview 139 countries in 2014 1980–2014 5 dimensions: goods, services, finance, people, and data 140 countries in 2014 2012–14 5 dimensions: goods, services, finance, people, and data and communications 60 countries in 2012 2009–12 6 dimensions: goods, services, finance, people, data and communications, and culture 187 countries in 2015 1970–2015 7 dimensions: goods, services, finance, people, data and communications, culture, and political globalization Dimensions People 20 Immigrant stock (80%) Travelers flow (20%) 15 Immigrant stock (33%) Travelers flow (33%) International student flow (33%) 19 Net immigration rate (40%) Travelers flow (40%) Hiring of foreign nationals (20%) 36 Immigrant stock (21%) Travelers flow (26%) International calls flow (25%) International letters flow (25%) Data and communi- cation 20 Cross-border used Internet bandwidth (100%) 15 International bandwidth stock (40%) International calls flow (40%) Traded publications (20%) 21 ICT goods flows (30%) Creative goods flows (30%) Broadband subs stock (20%) Internet subs stock (20%) Internet users stock (36%) Television stock (38%) Trade in newspapers flows (26%) Cultural/ political 17 Cultural integration Travelers flow (33%) International fixed telephone call (33%) Openness to foreign culture influence1 (33%) Cultural globalization McDonald/s restaurants (44%) IKEA stores (44%) Trade in books (11%) 26 Political globalization Embassies, memberships, US security council missions, international treaties Dimension variables (variable weight) Percentage weight in overall index XX 1 Elasticity for TFP with respect to flows is calculated by subtracting the elasticity for labor (or capital) productivity from that for GDP.
- 52. McKinsey & Company | 51 MGI Connectedness Index (1/5) SOURCE: McKinsey Global Institute analysis Country connectedness index and overall flows data, 2014 Rank of participation by flow as measured by flow intensity and share of world total 1–10 11–25 26–50 >50Connectedness index rank 100+ <7070–99Flow intensity Rank Country Score Connectedness Index rank Flow value 1 $ billion Flow intensity 2 % of GDPGoods Services Finance People Data 1 Singapore 64.2 1 2 2 12 6 1,392 452 2 Netherlands 54.3 3 3 6 21 1 1,834 211 3 United States 52.7 7 7 3 1 7 6,832 39 4 Germany 51.9 2 4 8 3 2 3,798 99 5 Ireland 45.9 32 1 1 28 9 559 227 6 United Kingdom 40.8 13 5 5 6 3 2,336 79 7 China 34.2 4 16 4 82 38 6,480 63 8 France 30.1 11 8 9 7 4 2,262 80 9 Belgium 28.0 5 6 33 33 8 1,313 246 10 Saudi Arabia 22.6 20 28 27 2 53 790 106 11 United Arab Emirates 22.2 6 23 17 4 46 789 196 12 Switzerland 18.0 12 11 10 17 13 848 115 13 Canada 17.3 16 22 11 11 18 1,403 79 14 Russia 16.1 21 25 18 5 25 1,059 57 15 Spain 14.4 25 13 19 14 16 1,105 79 16 Korea 14.0 8 12 28 50 44 1,510 107 17 Italy 13.4 17 18 24 16 19 1,587 74 18 Sweden 13.0 29 14 22 31 5 572 100 19 Austria 11.7 26 17 31 20 12 470 108 20 Malaysia 11.6 9 19 25 26 43 610 187 21 Mexico 10.7 14 63 34 18 41 1,022 80 22 Thailand 10.7 10 15 36 44 64 605 162 23 Kuwait 10.6 37 46 13 13 75 306 153 24 Japan 10.5 15 20 12 81 20 2,498 54 25 Kazakhstan 10.0 48 73 41 8 57 176 83 26 Ukraine 9.8 38 39 87 10 34 133 101 27 Australia 9.7 30 34 21 15 33 825 57 28 Denmark 8.9 35 9 32 41 11 369 108 1 Flows value represents total goods, services, and financial inflows and outflows. 2 Flow intensity represents the total value of goods, services, and financial flows as a share of the country’s GDP.
- 53. McKinsey & Company | 52 MGI Connectedness Index (2/5) SOURCE: McKinsey Global Institute analysis Country connectedness index and overall flows data, 2014 Rank of participation by flow as measured by flow intensity and share of world total 1–10 11–25 26–50 >50Connectedness index rank 100+ <7070–99Flow intensity Rank Country Score Connectedness Index rank Flow value 1 $ billion Flow intensity 2 % of GDPGoods Services Finance People Data 29 Jordan 8.8 73 50 75 9 83 50 138 30 India 8.5 24 10 35 58 70 1,316 64 31 Qatar 7.8 33 35 29 19 59 300 141 32 Czech Republic 7.5 18 33 57 59 15 397 193 33 Malta 7.4 97 26 7 90 50 31 308 34 Poland 7.0 23 31 47 34 22 585 107 35 Hungary 6.8 22 30 26 62 17 287 209 36 Norway 6.0 36 24 20 46 24 458 92 37 Vietnam 5.7 19 54 45 103 61 350 188 38 Lebanon 5.6 82 21 46 22 103 69 151 39 Finland 5.5 46 27 23 70 10 390 144 40 Portugal 5.5 47 36 30 23 31 255 111 41 Turkey 5.1 28 40 53 38 29 521 65 42 Slovak Republic 5.0 27 60 68 67 14 205 205 43 Israel 4.9 51 32 49 24 56 248 82 44 Brazil 4.5 41 38 14 125 30 869 37 45 Chile 4.1 45 58 16 102 27 239 92 46 Belarus 4.1 40 66 101 29 47 92 121 47 Greece 4.1 60 29 54 35 42 160 67 48 New Zealand 3.9 67 48 61 25 51 130 63 49 Romania 3.9 39 51 83 36 28 194 97 50 Croatia 3.7 76 45 104 27 37 57 100 51 Indonesia 3.4 31 49 38 106 76 504 57 52 Mozambique 3.3 95 70 15 117 110 40 246 53 South Africa 3.3 34 57 52 64 80 277 79 54 Philippines 3.2 54 41 44 52 67 230 81 55 Bulgaria 3.1 49 53 67 48 23 92 165 56 Albania 3.1 114 72 79 30 73 16 117 1 Flows value represents total goods, services, and financial inflows and outflows. 2 Flow intensity represents the total value of goods, services, and financial flows as a share of the country’s GDP.
- 54. McKinsey & Company | 53 MGI Connectedness Index (3/5) SOURCE: McKinsey Global Institute analysis Country connectedness index and overall flows data, 2014 Rank of participation by flow as measured by flow intensity and share of world total 1–10 11–25 26–50 >50Connectedness index rank 100+ <7070–99Flow intensity Rank Country Score Connectedness Index rank Flow value 1 $ billion Flow intensity 2 % of GDPGoods Services Finance People Data 57 Oman 3.1 44 65 55 54 66 121 148 58 Bosnia and Herzegovina 3.0 86 123 113 32 62 21 117 59 Lithuania 2.8 43 55 112 68 35 87 181 60 Cote d'Ivoire 2.7 80 104 136 37 114 28 82 61 Slovenia 2.7 42 56 64 75 36 105 212 62 Pakistan 2.7 78 91 84 39 88 116 47 63 Azerbaijan 2.6 75 62 37 57 69 92 122 64 Morocco 2.6 58 43 74 56 65 104 97 65 Estonia 2.6 56 47 60 72 21 54 209 66 Bangladesh 2.6 71 99 62 43 113 109 62 67 Serbia 2.5 74 61 103 45 45 52 118 68 Bahrain 2.4 65 118 56 49 58 28 82 69 Moldova 2.4 105 102 102 40 52 12 154 70 Cyprus 2.3 122 37 43 76 55 18 79 71 Jamaica 2.3 115 69 100 42 72 17 113 72 Argentina 2.3 64 68 63 60 32 198 37 73 Egypt 2.2 68 42 69 73 71 158 55 74 Colombia 2.2 61 89 40 83 54 197 52 75 Latvia 2.2 66 67 76 66 26 51 158 76 Armenia 2.2 121 97 99 47 81 12 113 77 Libya 2.2 53 78 59 84 108 65 159 78 Panama 2.1 69 44 42 129 39 74 161 79 Dominican Republic 2.1 94 77 93 53 82 41 64 80 El Salvador 2.1 98 110 94 51 89 26 104 81 Algeria 2.0 52 82 91 91 85 152 71 82 Angola 1.9 50 64 86 134 111 100 76 83 Nigeria 1.9 55 76 48 128 98 268 47 84 Burkina Faso 1.9 123 117 139 55 134 8 67 1 Flows value represents total goods, services, and financial inflows and outflows. 2 Flow intensity represents the total value of goods, services, and financial flows as a share of the country’s GDP.
- 55. McKinsey & Company | 54 MGI Connectedness Index (4/5) SOURCE: McKinsey Global Institute analysis Country connectedness index and overall flows data, 2014 Rank of participation by flow as measured by flow intensity and share of world total 1–10 11–25 26–50 >50Connectedness index rank 100+ <7070–99Flow intensity Rank Country Score Connectedness Index rank Flow value 1 $ billion Flow intensity 2 % of GDPGoods Services Finance People Data 85 Venezuela 1.9 57 85 71 86 60 172 34 86 Peru 1.8 62 88 51 104 49 122 60 87 Macedonia, FYR 1.8 93 101 124 63 48 18 156 88 Georgia 1.8 106 79 77 65 63 20 123 89 Sri Lanka 1.8 91 81 81 69 93 56 75 90 Guyana 1.7 118 128 116 61 125 4 133 91 Brunei 1.7 89 138 58 74 95 25 146 92 Cambodia 1.7 70 71 72 94 112 35 210 93 Ecuador 1.7 72 112 111 80 79 67 66 94 Tunisia 1.7 63 74 108 107 78 53 110 95 Mongolia 1.6 99 98 39 136 86 23 194 96 Kyrgyz Republic 1.6 102 87 88 78 118 13 173 97 Paraguay 1.6 83 133 121 77 94 26 84 98 Iran, Islamic Rep. 1.6 59 86 106 127 96 185 45 99 Costa Rica 1.5 81 75 65 101 74 43 87 100 Lao PDR 1.5 125 131 122 71 120 8 68 101 Ghana 1.5 77 80 126 109 100 32 83 102 Suriname 1.4 116 134 133 79 119 5 83 103 Liberia 1.4 134 121 50 100 139 7 333 104 Bolivia 1.4 84 108 85 93 84 33 98 105 Honduras 1.4 79 100 80 112 99 29 148 106 Yemen 1.4 90 116 114 88 116 26 70 107 Iceland 1.4 107 59 98 123 40 20 120 108 Guatemala 1.4 88 105 92 99 92 44 75 109 Montenegro 1.4 131 111 89 85 77 5 105 110 Uruguay 1.4 103 95 70 95 68 35 60 111 Maldives 1.4 132 52 109 121 126 7 225 112 Nicaragua 1.4 92 113 90 97 90 17 144 1 Flows value represents total goods, services, and financial inflows and outflows. 2 Flow intensity represents the total value of goods, services, and financial flows as a share of the country’s GDP.
- 56. McKinsey & Company | 55 MGI Connectedness Index (5/5) SOURCE: McKinsey Global Institute analysis Country connectedness index and overall flows data, 2014 Rank of participation by flow as measured by flow intensity and share of world total 1–10 11–25 26–50 >50Connectedness index rank 100+ <7070–99Flow intensity Rank Country Score Connectedness Index rank Flow value 1 $ billion Flow intensity 2 % of GDPGoods Services Finance People Data 113 Gabon 1.4 101 126 130 87 105 13 73 114 Tajikistan 1.4 119 114 78 89 127 11 120 115 Barbados 1.3 136 93 73 108 87 4 97 116 Fm Sudan 1.3 124 129 105 92 97 20 27 117 Mali 1.3 120 106 110 98 131 11 95 118 Kenya 1.3 100 84 127 119 91 35 58 119 Fiji 1.3 113 90 119 111 121 7 163 120 Congo, Dem. Rep. 1.3 110 120 66 118 138 15 46 121 Cape Verde 1.2 137 107 125 105 123 2 114 122 Lesotho 1.2 111 139 129 110 133 3 167 123 Samoa 1.2 138 135 132 96 129 1 121 124 Zambia 1.2 87 124 82 138 115 29 105 125 Senegal 1.2 109 103 117 120 106 15 93 126 Botswana 1.2 85 137 120 133 107 19 121 127 Namibia 1.2 96 122 96 132 101 16 120 128 Uganda 1.2 126 83 95 131 117 18 67 129 Guinea 1.2 130 132 107 113 136 5 82 130 Tanzania 1.2 108 94 97 135 104 25 51 131 Cameroon 1.2 112 96 137 126 124 17 54 132 Benin 1.2 127 125 128 115 132 7 78 133 Rwanda 1.2 135 127 135 114 130 5 64 134 Swaziland 1.1 117 115 138 124 128 5 143 135 Papua New Guinea 1.1 104 92 118 139 137 10 55 136 Belize 1.1 133 119 123 122 102 3 153 137 Grenada 1.1 139 136 134 116 109 1 96 138 Sierra Leone 1.1 128 130 115 130 135 5 96 139 Seychelles 1.1 129 109 131 137 122 3 179 1 Flows value represents total goods, services, and financial inflows and outflows. 2 Flow intensity represents the total value of goods, services, and financial flows as a share of the country’s GDP.
- 57. McKinsey & Company | 56 United States United Arab Emirates 46.9 45.9 44.1 24.5 25.8 28.2 24.5Japan Mexico United Kingdom Switzerland 28.6 Thailand 29.6 France 30.0Malaysia South Korea 100.0 90.9 Germany 92.6 Singapore Belgium 78.4 China 87.8 Netherlands Flows are concentrated among a few leading countries (1/2) The 15 most connected countries within each type of flow, 2014 Connectedness score 12.7 Sweden Spain South Korea Switzerland 14.5 14.7 15.5 India Thailand 16.8 12.9 Netherlands Singapore France 20.0 34.7 100.0 Germany 27.5 36.2 United Kingdom Belgium United States 29.9 33.5 Denmark 38.5 83.7 Ireland Mozambique 11.4 14.2 16.2 18.3 Germany Malta Brazil 10.8 10.8 Kuwait Japan Canada Switzerland France 18.8 24.2 57.3 25.2 Ireland China Netherlands 66.5 United Kingdom 68.9 83.2 United States Singapore 25.0 100.0 Services FinanceGoods SOURCE: McKinsey Global Institute analysis
- 58. McKinsey & Company | 57 People Data Flows are concentrated among a few leading countries (2/2) The 15 most connected countries within each type of flow, 2014 Connectedness score SOURCE: McKinsey Global Institute analysis Jordan Singapore 100.0 Saudi Arabia 40.8 36.7 31.4Kuwait 37.0 43.3 44.1 United Arab Emirates 35.1 81.7 United Kingdom 33.7 Kazakhstan 39.9 United States Canada Germany Ukraine 45.7 Russia France 51.2 Australia 26.6 Spain 30.6 6.7 3.5 20.6 Slovak Republic 3.4 6.8 10.3 Austria Finland Denmark 5.8 Ireland Switzerland United States Czech Republic 14.9 3.2 Belgium 18.8 Singapore 24.5 34.8 United Kingdom 42.7 Sweden 100.0Netherlands Germany 55.5 France
- 59. McKinsey & Company | 58 MGI Global Startup Survey 2015: Respondent demographics SOURCE: McKinsey Global Institute Global Startup Survey 2015 100% = 271 respondents NOTE: Numbers may not sum due to rounding. Energy and sustainability Entertainment Cities and transportation Other 4 6 E-commerce 6 Financial technology Enterprise software and security 6 Technology and communication 6 7 12 14 18 Education Health 21 Customer validation Growth/ scaling Product launch 105 (39%) 44 (16%) 66 (24%) Concept 56 (21%) 36 (13%) 45 (17%) 79 (29%) 2006–11 2012 2013 31 (11%) 2014 2015 80 (30%) Israel Canada United States 4Western Europe 7 2 7 Eastern Europe 56 3 South America 4 6 India Other 5 5 China Africa 103 (38%) Online survey In-person interview 168 (62%) Sector % Stage Number (%) Company age Number (%) Geography % Survey method Number (%)