Microsoft India - SQL Server The Forrester Wave Enterprise Database Management Systems, Q2 2009 Whitepaper

Making Leaders Successful Every Day
June 30, 2009
The Forrester Wave™: Enterprise
Database Management Systems,
Q2 2009
by Noel Yuhanna
for Application Development & Program Management Professionals

© 2009, Forrester Research, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction is strictly prohibited. Information is based on best available
resources. Opinions reflect judgment at the time and are subject to change. Forrester®, Technographics®, Forrester Wave, RoleView, TechRadar,
and Total Economic Impact are trademarks of Forrester Research, Inc. All other trademarks are the property of their respective companies. To
purchase reprints of this document, please email clientsupport@forrester.com. For additional information, go to www.forrester.com.
For Application Development & Program Management Professionals
Includes a Forrester Wave™
Executive Summary
In Forrester’s 153-criteria evaluation of enterprise open source and closed source database management
systems (DBMSes), we found that Oracle, IBM, Microsoft, and Sybase lead the pack because each offers
mature, high-performance, scalable, secure, and flexible solutions. It was no surprise to see Oracle
dominating in most of the features and functionality such as performance, availability, security, and
administration. IBM DB2 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows showed strong support for application
and data integration, performance, scalability, and administration, while Microsoft has impressive
capabilities for database programmability, application development, administration, and security. Sybase
Adaptive Server Enterprise continues to show improvement in its product, offering good support for
availability, performance, and administration. IBM Informix Dynamic Server, MySQL, and Ingres came
out as Strong Performers, following very closely on the heels of the Leaders and offering very respectable
alternatives and a multitude of choices for application developers and architects. PostgreSQL lacks the
Leaders’ breadth of features but is a reputable Contender for some use cases.
table of Contents
The DBMS Market Is Mature
Database Evaluation Overview
Large DBMS Vendors Continue Their
Dominance
Vendor Profiles
Supplemental Material
NOTES & RESOURCES
Forrester interviewed 21 vendor and user
companies, including IBM, Ingres, Microsoft,
Oracle, PostgreSQL, Sun Microsystems, and
Sybase.
Related Research Documents
“TPC Benchmarks Don’t Matter Anymore”
March 6, 2009
“The Forrester Wave™: Enterprise Data
Warehousing Platforms, Q1 2009”
February 6, 2009
June 30, 2009
The Forrester Wave™: Enterprise Database
Management Systems, Q2 2009
Oracle, IBM, And Microsoft Lead, With Sybase Following Closely; Ingres Tops
Open Source Databases In Current Offering
by Noel Yuhanna
with Mike Gilpin and David D’Silva
2
3
6
8
12

© 2009, Forrester Research, Inc. Reproduction ProhibitedJune 30, 2009
The Forrester Wave™: Enterprise Database Management Systems, Q2 2009
2
THE DBMS MARKET IS MATURE
Databases remain a critical asset to any enterprise. Although database management systems
(DBMSes) are mature, DBMS vendors continue to innovate, extending beyond the traditional
relational model by embracing new technologies such as XML, content management, and Web
services. Forrester estimates that the DBMS market will grow at 8% annually through 2012 as
enterprises deploy new applications, expand existing ones, and deal with increasing data volume.
Today, most DBMSes offer very good enterprise-class features and functionality, but a few lead the
pack in delivering extreme high-end performance, scalability, and availability. The DBMS market
has consolidated to three major vendors — IBM, Microsoft, and Oracle — that dominate more than
88% of the market. Other DBMS players — such as CA, Software AG, and Sybase — continue to
cater to the specialized DBMS market to support legacy applications, complex requirements, and
low-cost DBMSes. In addition, open source databases such as Ingres, MySQL, and PostgreSQL
continue to expand their features and functionality, providing viable alternatives that can support
most small to moderately sized business applications.
Today, 90% of enterprises support more than one enterprise DBMS product, such as IBM DB2,
Microsoft SQL Server, and Oracle, for their mission-critical database applications, but they often
choose to deploy one primary DBMS more extensively than the others. Why have more than
one DBMS? The need is often driven by application requirements, the size of databases, cost,
performance, availability requirements, and incumbent IT skills. Choose carefully, though, because
once you deploy a database, migration is usually costly and complex. Hence, choosing a DBMS is
often a long-term, strategically important commitment.
The Database Market Landscape
Forrester estimates the current database market to be $27 billion — including new database licenses,
technical support, services, and consulting — and it is likely to grow to $32 billion by 2013. The
database market today is divided into three main categories:
· Online transaction processing (OLTP) databases. This category primarily focuses on
applications such as enterprise resource planning (ERP), customer relationship management
(CRM), supply chain management (SCM), call center, order entry, and other custom
applications that require databases to support high concurrency, performance, scalability, and
security. Products in this category deal with real-time data; are optimized to support high levels
of inserting, deleting, and updating information; and support many concurrent users. Each
of the transactional databases would have a set of production and nonproduction databases
(test, development, and staging) to support any given application. Vendors such as CA, IBM,
Microsoft, Oracle, Software AG, and Sybase provide OLTP databases. In addition, open source
databases that support such usage include Ingres, MySQL, and PostgreSQL.

© 2009, Forrester Research, Inc. Reproduction Prohibited June 30, 2009
3
· Data warehouses. In this category, data stored in a warehouse is used for business intelligence,
analytics, and other decision support requirements. Usually, data is moved from OLTP
databases into the warehouse on a regular basis using extract, transfer, load (ETL) and other
data movement technologies. Data warehouse vendors such as Greenplum, Netezza, Sybase,
and Teradata have created specialized software for this category, and some traditional DBMS
vendors such as IBM, Ingres, Microsoft, and Oracle have extended their products to support
warehouse requirements.
· Specialized databases. Beyond the OLTP and warehouse categories, the specialized database
category provides DBMSes used by applications for specific purposes — such as mobile
applications, XML applications, or standalone applications that need an embedded database
repository. Most of these requirements come from value-added resellers (VARs), original
equipment manufacturers (OEMs), and independent software vendors (ISVs) that use a
specialized database to store data and metadata for their applications. Vendors of specialized
databases include IBM, Microsoft, Oracle, and Sybase, as well as smaller vendors such as Mark
Logic, Progress, and Software AG.
DATABASE EVALUATION OVERVIEW
Forrester assessed the state of the enterprise database market and evaluated the strengths and
weaknesses of top DBMS vendors and open source database projects to see how they stack up
against each other.
Evaluated Criteria: Offering, Strategy, And Market Presence
After examining past research, user needs assessments, surveys of database administrators, and
vendor interviews, we developed a comprehensive set of evaluation criteria. We evaluated vendors
and projects against 153 criteria, which we grouped into three high-level buckets:
· Current offering. To assess product strengths, we evaluated each offering against seven groups
of criteria: data types and data integrity; performance, scalability, and very large databases
(VLDBs); application development; database availability; database security; platform support;
and database administration.
· Strategy. We reviewed each vendor and project’s strategy and vision and considered planned
enhancements for positioning products to meet future customer demands. We also looked
at the financial resources available to support the product and the vendor’s go-to-market and
overall corporate strategies. We also reviewed each of the product’s pricing and licensing
options and cost of production and development deployments, in addition to the commitment
of the vendor or community. For open source projects, we considered the project’s overall
strategy and cost as well as the size and activity level of its community.

4
· Market presence. To assess each product’s market presence, we combined information about
each vendor’s company financials, adoption, training and certification, systems integrators and
partners, and global presence. For open source projects, we assessed the project’s installed base,
its number of paying customers, the scope and size of its community, its level of support, and
the size of its ecosystem.
Evaluated Vendors Meet Enterprise Database Requirements With Credible Deployments
Forrester included seven DBMS vendors and open source database projects in the assessment: IBM,
Ingres, Microsoft, Oracle, PostgreSQL, Sybase, and Sun Microsystems (MySQL). All of the DBMS
vendors and projects assessed in this Forrester Wave™ offer very good basic database features and
functionality to support any application that simply needs to store, manage, and access records. Any
enterprise DBMS not listed in the Wave should be carefully evaluated before being used for any new
applications, even basic ones. Of many criteria, most notably, all of the evaluated DBMS vendors
and projects (see Figure 1):
· Have enterprise-class database features and functionality. We included vendors and open
source database projects that have strong database features and functionality to support
any type of enterprise application deployment. These include features such as support for
application development, high availability, disaster recovery, security, high performance, a wide
range of data types, and backup and recovery.
· Have a credible installed base. All of the evaluated DBMS vendors and open source database
projects have 500 or more customers using their product in production.
· Have enterprise usage for mission-critical applications. Each project or vendor has active
customers using its products to support mission-critical applications.

5
Figure 1 Evaluated Vendors And Projects: Product Information And Selection Criteria
Source: Forrester Research, Inc.
Vendor
IBM
Ingres
Microsoft
MySQL
Oracle
PostgreSQL
Sybase
Product evaluated
IBM DB2
IBM Informix Dynamic Server
Ingres Database
SQL Server
MySQL
Oracle Database
PostgreSQL
Adaptive Server Enterprise
Product version
evaluated
9.5
11.5
9.2
2008
5.1
11g
8.3
15.0.3
Version
release date
October 2007
May 2008
November 2008
August 2008
November 2008
August 2007
February 2008
December 2008
Vendor selection criteria
The product focuses on database management, and evaluated products were released prior to January 1,
2009.
The product has enterprise-class database features and functionality, including support for high
availability, security, performance, manageability, and integration with applications.
The product works with enterprise transactional applications such as ERP, CRM, SCM, and
in-house-developed transactional applications such as eCommerce, Web 2.0, etc.
The product can be a closed source or open source enterprise-class database product.
The product supports integration with popular programming models including .NET and Java.
The product has been deployed for at least 500 customers.
If closed source, the product has had database revenue growth of 5% or more over the past 12 months.
The product was mentioned by Forrester clients in five or more inquiries in the past 12 months.
Products that focus solely on a particular application type — including embedded databases, mobile
databases, in-memory databases, XML databases, Java databases, cache databases, and data
warehouses — are not included in this Wave.

6
LARGE DBMS VENDORS CONTINUE THEIR DOMINANCE
We weighted our evaluation criteria to assess the vendors and projects for enterprise transactional
applications that require comprehensive features and functionality. We included criteria such as
disparate data types, data integrity, high availability, security, performance, application development,
database administration, scalability, and manageability. The weightings are balanced to represent
the priorities of DBAs and enterprise architects aiming for a broader database implementation
that covers support for packaged and custom applications and the ability to support small to large
databases in a 24x7 environment. Clients with a narrower range of requirements — for example, for
specialized application usage scenarios — should re-weight the Wave criteria to reflect those specific
priorities.
Our evaluation found that (see Figure 2):
· Oracle, IBM DB2 for LUW, and Microsoft lead the pack; Sybase is strengthening. Oracle
topped the current offering criteria and tied the top spot in the strategy category with IBM
DB2 for LUW. Oracle has very strong set of database features and functionality in availability,
security, performance, administration, data types, and integration. IBM DB2 for LUW has a
good balance of features and strategy. Microsoft has done extremely well with its overall current
offering, with high scores in database programmability, security, availability, and application/
data integration. Sybase has done well to gain a spot in the Leader position. Sybase’s product
is highly reliable with a good set of enterprise-class features and functionality to support most
types of applications.
· IBM Informix, Ingres, and MySQL offer competitive options. Strong Performers include IBM
Informix, Ingres, and MySQL. Each offers database features and functionality that are a good fit
for many applications. IBM Informix did well overall, offering a viable low-cost enterprise-class
DBMS solution. Ingres topped the open source database products, followed by MySQL, with
both offering a good alternative for customers seeking a low-cost DBMS.
· PostgreSQL lags behind. PostgreSQL has some good capabilities across the board but lags in
performance, scalability, administration, application development, support for disparate data
types, and VLDBs.
This evaluation of the database market is intended only as a starting point. Readers are encouraged
to view detailed product evaluations and adapt the criteria weightings to fit their individual needs
through the Forrester Wave Excel-based vendor comparison tool.

7
Figure 2 Forrester Wave™: Enterprise Database Management Systems, Q2 ’09
Go online to download
the Forrester Wave tool
for more detailed product
evaluations, feature
comparisons, and
customizable rankings.
Risky
Bets Contenders
Current
offering
StrategyWeak
Weak
Strong
Strong Market presence
Leaders
Strong
Performers
Full vendor
participation
Oracle
IBM DB2
for LUW
Microsoft
IBM Informix
Sybase
Ingres
MySQL
PostgreSQL

8
Figure 2 Forrester Wave™: Enterprise Database Management Systems, Q2 ’09 (Cont.)
VENDOR PROFILES
All the products and projects assessed in this Wave offer good, basic DBMS features and
functionality for a wide range of data types, data integrity, application development, administration,
security, performance, and scalability needed to support most small to medium-sized applications.
However, for applications that require the most-comprehensive DBMS features and functionality,
look at Oracle, IBM DB2 for LUW, Microsoft SQL Server, and Sybase. If applications will require
large and complex transactional databases, then Oracle and IBM DB2 for LUW are the best choices.
And finally, if you are looking for a low-cost enterprise-class DBMS, then look at IBM Informix,
MySQL, and Ingres. The products included in this evaluation represent a wide range of options to
meet a wide variety of requirements.
IBMDB2forLUW
IBMInformix
Ingres
Microsoft
MySQL
Oracle
PostgreSQL
Sybase
CURRENT OFFERING
Data types and data integrity
Performance, scalability, and VLDB
Application development
Database availability
Database security
Platform support
Database administration
STRATEGY
Product strategy
Commitment
Pricing and licensing
MARKET PRESENCE
Company financials
Adoption
Training and certification
Systems integrators and partners
Global presence
4.04
4.60
4.21
4.73
3.94
3.36
2.96
4.32
4.58
4.75
4.40
0.00
4.19
4.00
4.30
3.70
3.95
5.00
Forrester’s
Weighting
50%
10%
15%
15%
20%
15%
10%
15%
50%
50%
50%
0%
0%
20%
20%
20%
20%
20%
3.64
4.36
3.81
3.99
4.22
1.95
2.88
4.05
3.20
3.00
3.40
0.00
4.11
3.70
2.90
3.95
5.00
5.00
2.90
2.76
2.10
3.16
3.46
2.34
3.09
3.24
3.65
3.50
3.80
0.00
3.01
5.00
2.60
1.40
3.05
3.00
3.77
4.36
3.06
4.61
4.40
3.43
1.60
4.17
4.40
5.00
3.80
0.00
4.60
4.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
4.00
2.44
2.81
2.30
2.72
1.46
1.52
4.74
2.77
3.93
3.25
4.60
0.00
4.06
5.00
5.00
3.30
4.00
3.00
4.54
4.84
5.00
4.70
5.00
3.56
3.27
4.94
4.58
4.75
4.40
0.00
4.60
4.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
4.00
2.22
2.13
1.80
2.97
1.81
1.89
4.16
1.52
2.80
2.80
2.80
0.00
3.44
5.00
3.60
3.00
2.60
3.00
3.37
3.78
2.81
3.01
4.22
2.86
3.09
3.55
3.98
3.95
4.00
0.00
3.83
4.00
3.60
2.90
4.65
4.00
All scores are based on a scale of 0 (weak) to 5 (strong).

9
Leaders: Broad Set Of Functionality To Support Any Critical Transactional Application
· Oracle: The most comprehensive set of database features and functionality. Most customers
agree that Oracle offers the best overall database technology among DBMS vendors. Oracle
continues to innovate, offering new features and functionality for scalability, availability,
integration, performance, security, and manageability with every new release. Oracle is
executing very well against its DBMS vision, and, with its recent acquisition of Sun, is likely to
extend its vision to include a database machine tightly integrated with Oracle’s DBMS to deliver
high performance and automation and to fill out its low-cost DBMS offering with MySQL.
Suitability: Oracle DBMS is well known for its scalability architectures, especially using Oracle
RAC (Real Application Clusters), which is a key differentiator to support scale-out and high
availability for high-end applications. Customers today are running tens of terabyte-sized
Oracle databases for transactional applications, with some supporting hundreds and thousands
of concurrent users. Application developers and architects who need the best in high availability
or scale-out clustering database technology should look first at Oracle.
Issues: Oracle has no issues regarding lagging database features and functionality. Although some
customers have major concerns about Oracle database licensing cost, Oracle often gives deep
discounts, especially to larger enterprises, to make its product more competitive. Oracle has in
the past focused more heavily on large enterprises; however, in the past three to four years, its
focus has expanded to include small and medium-size businesses (SMB) and moderately sized
companies through offering Oracle Express (a free DBMS) and Standard Edition One (a low-cost
product). MySQL under Oracle is likely to further strengthen its SMB market support, helping
Oracle compete against Microsoft, which continues to dominate the SMB segment.
· IBM DB2 for LUW: A strong database offering with good momentum. IBM DB2 for
LUW offers strong database features and functionality, especially in the areas of application
development, database programmability, application/data integration, data types, XML
hybrid storage, automation, caching, and performance. Enterprises like DB2’s XML storage,
strong compression support, and high reliability to support their extremely mission-critical
applications. Although IBM DB2 for LUW has done well over the years, Oracle continues to
overshadow it with overall features and functionality. With the recent release of DB2 9.7, IBM
now offers support for native PL/SQL, which makes it easier to migrate applications from
Oracle to DB2.
Suitability: IBM DB2 for LUW is known for its robustness and high performance, especially on
UNIX platforms such as AIX, HP-UX, and Linux. It currently holds the title for the fastest TPC-C
transactional application benchmark.1
IBM DB2 for LUW is suitable for moderately sized to large
transactional applications, XML applications, and complex transactional applications. Enterprises
that are already using DB2 on the mainframe will like the tighter integration with DB2 LUW to
support mashups, Web 2.0, and other applications using data federation.

10
Issues: Although DB2 for LUW offers good high availability and scale-out features, it still trails
Oracle in this area. Its support for data and index partitioning is average.
· Microsoft: The most aggressive DBMS vendor with a strong road map. Microsoft has done
reasonably well in the database business but over the past three years has shown increasing
focus and commitment to going after the enterprise market. SQL Server 2005 and, more
recently, SQL Server 2008 have enabled Microsoft to take market share in moderately sized
to large enterprises, delivering good performance, scalability, security, and availability
functionality. Five years ago, hardly any enterprises ran multiterabyte databases with SQL Server
to support critical applications. Today, hundreds of enterprises are running 10-terabyte and
larger transactional SQL Server databases.
Suitability: SQL Server is known for its easy-to-use, simplified enterprise DBMS and for
delivering the best price-performance for most business applications. Many enterprises like the
breadth and depth of the packaged applications SQL Server supports across various industries.
In addition, SQL Server 2008 offers strong support for unstructured and semistructured data.
Enterprises that want a cost-effective and easy-to-use enterprise DBMS should look at SQL
Server.
Issues: Although SQL Server lags in distributed caching and scale-out architectures, Microsoft
is adding such features in future releases. For example, “Velocity” is a distributed caching
technology that supports high-volume transactions.
· Sybase: A good set of features to support most business requirements. Sybase is known for its
reliability and robustness and for its reasonably broad set of database features. Sybase remains
committed to Sybase ASE; it has extended its features to support column-level encryption,
shared-disk clustering, and XML. Sybase continues to experience growth in database revenue
and customer adoption. In 2008, its DBMS revenue grew by 28%, and it added 1,200 new
customers. Also, Sybase announced that its upcoming release will include in-memory-database
and caching technologies.
Suitability: Sybase has been especially strong in the financial sector, supporting critical
applications where reliability, robustness, and availability are top requirements. Sybase ASE
is suitable for custom transactional applications, focusing primarily on structured data.
Sybase ASE’s sweet spot is moderately sized applications with databases of up to 5 TB in size,
supporting hundreds and thousands of concurrent users. In addition, unlike other DBMS
vendors, Sybase offers a separate data warehouse product called Sybase IQ that supports
business intelligence (BI), data warehousing, data marts, and analytics.2

11
Issues: Sybase is not widely supported by packaged applications such as CRM, ERP, and SCM.
Most of the deployments today are for moderately sized deployments; few support extremely
high-end databases, especially transactional databases that are more than 5 TB in size. Sybase
customers often raise concerns regarding the difficulty they have in finding qualified staff
members, as DBAs skilled in working with Sybase are not as easy to find as DBAs skilled in
working with Oracle or SQL Server.
Strong Performers: Viable Low-Cost Alternatives To Support Most Business Applications
· IBM Informix: An offering with good features but average momentum. When IBM acquired
Informix more than five years ago, some customers were concerned that it might cease to exist,
requiring them to move to DB2. However, IBM Informix is not only alive but continues to grow
at a healthy rate of 18% and is used by more than 100,000 enterprises worldwide. IBM Informix
has a good balance of database features to support many business applications.
Suitability: IBM Informix is suitable for most custom small to moderately sized transactional
applications.
Issues: IBM Informix is not widely supported by packaged applications such as CRM, ERP, and
SCM or in vertical industries other than finance. In addition, DBAs and application developers
for the Informix platform are often hard to find, creating a staffing challenge.
· Ingres: Best open source database but lacking in visibility. Ingres has the best set of enterprise
database features and functionality among open source databases. It offers good capabilities for
availability, security, administration, programmability, and platform support.
Suitability: Ingres is a viable open source database that offers good reliability and features.
Enterprises looking for a low-cost DBMS to support their custom transactional applications
should consider Ingres. The sweet spot for Ingres is for small to midsized applications with
databases smaller than 1 TB in size and supporting 1,000 concurrent users.
Issues: Ingres is not supported by many packaged applications, which is a key issue. Also, many
existing Ingres customers remain concerned about the difficulty in finding Ingres skills.
· MySQL: An improved offering with increased adoption. MySQL has done well in narrowing
the features and functionality gap with Ingres and even relative to closed source databases.
MySQL has the largest open source database community, and hundreds and thousands of
enterprises use it for their mission-critical deployments.
Suitability: MySQL is suitable for small to moderately sized custom applications with databases
smaller than 1 TB in size. MySQL has good support for programmability, administration, and
replication. Applications that are suitable to run on MySQL include Web-based applications,

12
Web 2.0, reporting, and other internal apps. Enterprises looking to lower the cost of data
management should consider MySQL.
Issues: Although MySQL is supported by many packaged applications including some in key
vertical industries, it lacks the support of others such as PeopleSoft, SAP, and Siebel.
Contender: Mainly To Support Small Non-Mission-Critical Business Applications
· PostgreSQL: An offering that lags in enterprise database features and functionality. Although
PostgreSQL offers a good set of basic database features and functionality, it lags in enterprise-
class capabilities for availability, security, programmability, and performance. In the past, Sun
and Fujitsu have supported PostgreSQL — and more recently EnterpriseDB — but its enterprise
adoption has been slow, although it has the second-largest developer community after MySQL.
Suitability: Enterprises looking for a low-cost option for supporting small non-mission-critical
databases should consider PostgreSQL. It is suitable for supplementing an existing DBMS, for
usage in reporting, as an archival data repository, or for supporting small Web-based applications.
Issues: Although PostgreSQL has good features and functionality, it is not a proven enterprise-
class DBMS to support mission-critical deployments.
Supplemental MATERIAL
Online Resource
The online version of Figure 2 is an Excel-based vendor comparison tool that provides detailed
product evaluations and customizable rankings.
Data Sources Used In This Forrester Wave
Forrester used a combination of two data sources to assess the strengths and weaknesses of each
solution:
· Vendor surveys. Forrester surveyed vendors on their capabilities as they relate to the evaluation
criteria. Once we analyzed the completed vendor surveys, we conducted vendor calls where
necessary to gather details of vendor qualifications.
· Customer reference calls. To validate product and vendor qualifications, Forrester also
conducted reference calls with seven of each vendor’s current customers.

13
The Forrester Wave Methodology
We conduct primary research to develop a list of vendors that meet our criteria to be evaluated
in this market. From that initial pool of vendors, we then narrow our final list. We choose these
vendors based on: 1) product fit; 2) customer success; and 3) Forrester client demand. We eliminate
vendors that have limited customer references and products that don’t fit the scope of our evaluation.
After examining past research, user need assessments, and vendor and expert interviews, we develop
the initial evaluation criteria. To evaluate the vendors and their products against our set of criteria,
we gather details of product qualifications through a combination of lab evaluations, questionnaires,
demos, and/or discussions with client references. We send evaluations to the vendors for their
review, and we adjust the evaluations to provide the most accurate view of vendor offerings and
strategies.
We set default weightings to reflect our analysis of the needs of large user companies — and/or
other scenarios as outlined in the Forrester Wave document — and then score the vendors based
on a clearly defined scale. These default weightings are intended only as a starting point, and we
encourage readers to adapt the weightings to fit their individual needs through the Excel-based
tool. The final scores generate the graphical depiction of the market based on current offering,
strategy, and market presence. Forrester intends to update vendor evaluations regularly as product
capabilities and vendor strategies evolve.
Endnotes
1
Although TPC benchmarks have been in use for more than a decade, their value has diminished in recent
years. See the March 6, 2009, “TPC Benchmarks Don’t Matter Anymore” report.
2
Having introduced low-cost enterprise data warehouse (EDW) appliances that incorporate its mature
Sybase IQ database, Sybase has positioned itself as a go-to EDW vendor for the midmarket and for
budget-constrained large enterprises. See the February 6, 2009, “The Forrester Wave™: Enterprise Data
Warehousing Platforms, Q1 2009” report.

Forrester Research, Inc. (Nasdaq: FORR)
is an independent research company
that provides pragmatic and forward-
thinking advice to global leaders in
business and technology. Forrester
works with professionals in 19 key roles
at major companies providing
proprietary research, consumer insight,
consulting, events, and peer-to-peer
executive programs. For more than 25
years, Forrester has been making IT,
marketing, and technology industry
leaders successful every day. For more
information, visit www.forrester.com.
Australia
Brazil
Canada
Denmark
France
Germany
Hong Kong
India
Israel
Japan
Korea
The Netherlands
Switzerland
United Kingdom
United States
Headquarters
Forrester Research, Inc.
400 Technology Square
Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
Tel: +1 617.613.6000
Fax: +1 617.613.5000
Email: forrester@forrester.com
Nasdaq symbol: FORR
www.forrester.com
M a k i n g L e a d e r s S u c c e s s f u l E v e r y D a y
For a complete list of worldwide locations,
visit www.forrester.com/about.
Research and Sales Offices
46643
For information on hard-copy or electronic reprints, please contact Client Support
at +1 866.367.7378, +1 617.613.5730, or clientsupport@forrester.com.
We offer quantity discounts and special pricing for academic and nonprofit institutions.

Microsoft India - SQL Server The Forrester Wave Enterprise Database Management Systems, Q2 2009 Whitepaper

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Similar to Microsoft India - SQL Server The Forrester Wave Enterprise Database Management Systems, Q2 2009 Whitepaper (20)

More from Microsoft Private Cloud (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Microsoft India - SQL Server The Forrester Wave Enterprise Database Management Systems, Q2 2009 Whitepaper