SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Submitted to:
Prof. A.A.Napolean
Submitted by:-
Akash Chandwani – 12BCE0133
R.V.Kartick – 12BME0357
Deepak Kumar Singh – 12BCE0534
Milan Manjunath Sehnai – 12BCH0059
EVS Project on -
1. Introduction
2. Adjustments and Amendments
3. Ozone layer
4. UV-Radiations
5. Discovery and Research
6. Ozone Depleting Substances
7. Montreal Protocol
8. Provisions of Montreal protocol
9. Management Plans
10. Impact on CFC’s and it’s Phase out management plan
11. Impact on HCFC’s and it’s Phase out management plan
12. Implementation in US.
13. What if there were no Montreal Protocol??
Introduction
 Montreal Protocol popularly known as Montreal Protocol
on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer.
 It is a protocol to the Vienna Convention for the
Protection of the Ozone Layer.
 Main aim is to eliminate the substances that are
responsible for the ozone depletion.
Adjustments and Amendments
Montreal Protocol has been either adjusted and/or
amended in –
 London 1990
 Copenhagen 1992
 Vienna 1995
 Montreal 1997
 Beijing 1999
Position of Ozone layer
Antarctica Ozone Depletion: Formation of
the hole near the south pole in the Ozone
layer
Why is ozone useful?
 Ozone is a protective layer that absorbs the very
energetic radiations (UV) falling on the earth.
Montreal protocol1
Montreal protocol1
UV-Radiations
UV- Radiations capable of
penetrating the nitrogen is
divided into three categories
 UV-A ( λ = 400–315 nm)
 UV-B ( λ = 315–280 nm)
 UV-C ( λ = 280–100 nm)
only extremely short or vacuum UV (10–100 nm) is
screened out by nitrogen.
UV-C
 It is very harmful to all living beings.
 It is entirely screened out by a combination of O2 (<
200 nm) and O3 (> about 200 nm) by around 35
kilometres (115,000 ft) altitude.
 This type of radiation doesn’t reach the earth surface.
UV-B
 UV-B radiation can be harmful to the skin and is the main
cause of sunburn.
 Excessive exposure can also cause genetic
damage, resulting in problems such as skin cancer.
 The ozone layer is very effective at screening out UV-B.
 UV-B, particularly at its longest wavelengths, reaches the
surface
UV-A
 Ozone is transparent to most UV-A.
 So most of this type of longer wavelength reaches the
surface, and becomes the primary type of UV from the
Sun to do so.
 less harmful to DNA. although it may still potentially
cause indirect genetic damage in skin
Ozone altitude UV graph
Discovery and Research
In 1974-nobel prize winners
Mario Molina and Sherwood
Rowland discover that CFC
molecules were stable enough
to remain in the atmosphere
until they got up into the
middle of the
stratosphere where they would
finally be broken down
by ultraviolet
radiation releasing a chlorine
atom.
Ozone Depleting Compounds
 Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs)
 Halons
 Carbon tetrachloride,
 Methyl chloroform
 Hydrobromofluorocarbons (HBFCs)
 Hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs)
 Methyl bromide
 Bromochloromethane (BCM)
Montreal protocol1
Montreal-Protocol
 It is an international treaty
designed to protect the ozone layer
by phasing out the production of
numerous substances believed to
be responsible for ozone depletion.
 The treaty is structured around several groups
of halogenated hydrocarbons that have been shown to
play a role in ozone depletion. All of these ozone
depleting substances contain either chlorine or bromine.
 For each group, including group ST, the treaty
provides a timetable on which the production of
those substances must be phased out and
eventually eliminated
 It was agreed on 16 September 1987 and entered
into force on 1 January 1989.
 It is also ratified by 197 states and the European
Union.
The Montreal Protocol - Provisions
 Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), halons, carbon tetrachloride,
and methyl chloroform- were to be phased out by 2000
(2005 for methyl chloroform)
 Freeze at 1986 levels in mid 1989 and 20% cut in 1993
 Production and consumption of CFC-11, CFC-12, CFC-113,
CFC-114, CFC- 115 were to be reduced by 50% of the
1986 levels by 1998
 Production of halon-1211, halon-1301 and halon-2402
were to be brought back to 1986 levels by 1992
Management Plan
 CFCs Phase-out Management Plan
 CFC Phasing out plan
 Regularly checked by bodies
 Also checks the emission of halon 1211, 1301, 2402; CFCs
13, 111, 112, etc.
 Carbon tetrachloride was given the special attention.
Products Containing CFCs
 Coolants (in refrigerator, AC)
 Propellants (in Pressurized
cans, Rockets)
 Solvents for cleaning
electronics
 Blowing agent for manufacture of foam
Why is CFC harmful to us?
 CFC gas is not at all harmful
to humans but its harmful
to the Ozone layer.
 The life time of CFC gas is very long, about 5200yrs. There
is no way to destroy them. It has no way to go. It directly
goes up to the ozone and damages it.
Montreal protocol1
Impact of Montreal protocol on CFCs
 If all parties continue to comply, ozone layer expected to
fully recover by 2050.
 Montreal and subsequent agreements obliged parties to
phase out most harmful CFCs (used in
aerosols, refrigerants, foams, solvents) by 1996; with
phase-out of by 2010 of less active CFCs. Most halons
were phased out by 1994.
 98% of all chemicals covered by the protocol were phased
out by 2009.
Management plans
 Hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs) Phase-out
Management Plan (HPMP)
 Freezing time = 2013
 Reducing time = 2015
This includes the pase out of
 CFCl3 (CFC-11)
 CF2Cl2 (CFC-12)
 C2F3Cl3 (CFC-113)
 C2F4Cl2(CFC-114)
 C2F5Cl (CFC-115)
Impact of Montreal Protocol on
HCFCs.
 Used as the first major replacement for CFCs, especially in
refrigerants for air conditioning.
 By 2013, all parties must freeze consumption and
production of HCFCs, and start reducing by 2015.
 Developed countries must complete 99.5 phase-out by
2020 nd 100% by 2030. Developing countries must
complete 99.5 % by 2030 and 100% by 2040.
 In U.S., HCFC production down 65% by 1/1/2010. On
track to 90% cut by 1/1/2015 and 99.5% cut by 1/1/2020.
Management plans
 Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs)
 HFCs are the substitutes of the CFCs and HCFCs.
 It’s produced mostly in developed countries.
 It does not harm Ozone layer.
 But it is responsible for Green House Effect as it traps huge
amount of infrared radiations from the sun.
Earlier Challenges
 Cost of replacing CFCs was the key hurdle that parties
had to overcome.
 By 1987 it was less costly for USG, Japan, Canada to ban
CFCs, as all three had already banned CFCs in aerosol
cans.
 Harder for Japan and EU, who threatened to veto. Also
harder USSR, could not afford to fund research to find
alternatives.
 Also opposed by China, India, Brazil anticipating massive
CFC production in coming decade.
 Keys to compromise were agreement from industrialized
countries to help developing countries find
alternatives, and agreement on delaying phase-out
deadlines for developing countries
Mechanisms for Implementation
 Multilateral Fund: 2009-2011 budget = $490 million.
 Annual reporting obligations
 Implementation Committee
 Adjustment provision
 Grace period for developing countries
World map showing the countries that have signed the protocol and
that have not
Montreal protocol under action: importance of 1996 phase-out.
Funds as a challenge to Montreal Protocol.
Implementation in US
 U.S. already banned Freon (CFC) in 1978
 “Clean Air Act of 1990” implemented
Montreal protocol and gave EPA oversight and
enforcement role.
 To support phase-outs, EPA has approved over 300
alternatives to ozone depleting substances.
 Other measures: tax policy: taxes on production of ODSs
and tax incentives to industry to develop alternatives;
labeling of ODS-containing products; identifying safer
alternatives.
 EPA allows exemptions to industries facing technical
challenges to finding alternatives, e.g. medical inhalers.
Key Achievements
 Truly global participation
 Elimination of ozone depleting
substances
 Healing the ozone layer
 Supporting the developing countries
 High rates of compliance
 Health benefits
 Climate change benefits
 Global recognition
 2010 phase out milestone
Achievements
 It has been adopted
and implemented world wide.
 The two treaties have been
ratified by 197 states and the
European Union making them
the most widely ratified treaties
in United Nations history.
Benefits
 It is believed that if the international agreement is
adhered to, the ozone layer is expected to recover by
2050.
What if there were no
Montreal Protocol??
 No CFC ban
 There would have been 50% ozone layer depletion in
northern hemisphere, 70% in southern hemisphere, by
2050.
 130 million more cases of cataracts; 19 million more
cases of non-melanoma skin cancer; 1.5 million more
cases of melanoma skin cancer. Which would overall
cost $4.2 trillion.
Thank you
let's make earth a better place to live in

More Related Content

PPTX
Montreal protocol
PPTX
About the Montreal Protocol
PPTX
Climate Change UNFCCC
PPTX
Montreal_protocol_Report
PPTX
UNFCCC
PPT
Global Warming
PPTX
Montreal protocol
PPTX
Environmental Treaties, Laws and Policies
Montreal protocol
About the Montreal Protocol
Climate Change UNFCCC
Montreal_protocol_Report
UNFCCC
Global Warming
Montreal protocol
Environmental Treaties, Laws and Policies

What's hot (20)

PPTX
The Kyoto protocol
PPTX
Kyoto protocol
PPTX
REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation)
PPTX
Kyoto protocol (Pre/Post)
PPTX
Introduction to UNFCCC & International Climate Negotiations
PDF
Activities of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
 
PDF
Global warming effects and control measures
PPTX
Earth summit
PPTX
montreal protocol what was it ?
PPTX
Kyoto protocol
PPTX
Climate Change Past Present Future
PPTX
Unfccc, kyoto protocol, montreal protocol, pollution, international conventio...
PPTX
Ozone Depletion and the Montreal Protocol
PPTX
MANAGEMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT
PPTX
PPTX
Global warming & kyoto protocol
PPTX
CFCs details
PPTX
Pakistan environmental protection act 1997
PPTX
REDD+ and Biodiversity Conservation
The Kyoto protocol
Kyoto protocol
REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation)
Kyoto protocol (Pre/Post)
Introduction to UNFCCC & International Climate Negotiations
Activities of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
 
Global warming effects and control measures
Earth summit
montreal protocol what was it ?
Kyoto protocol
Climate Change Past Present Future
Unfccc, kyoto protocol, montreal protocol, pollution, international conventio...
Ozone Depletion and the Montreal Protocol
MANAGEMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT
Global warming & kyoto protocol
CFCs details
Pakistan environmental protection act 1997
REDD+ and Biodiversity Conservation
Ad

Similar to Montreal protocol1 (20)

PPTX
Protecting the atmosphere
PPTX
Montreal Protocol and its causes to the Environment.pptx
PPTX
montrealprotocol-130712150348-phpapp02 (1).pptx
PPTX
Refrigerant Preso 2009 Revised 10 16 2009.pptx
PPTX
The depleting of the ozone layer
PDF
Contemporary environmental issues and solutions in modern world by Garima Ta...
PPTX
Montreal Protocol and Ozone Layer Depletion
PPTX
cfc and its protocol to reduce its usage
PDF
Hallow or Hollow fight for Climate-Story of HFCs
PPTX
ozone depletion and business
PDF
CE102-Module2_ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES ECOSYSTEM ENVIRONMENT.pdf
PPT
What Is Ozone Layer Destruction
PPT
Presentationv1 Part1
PPSX
Ozone depletion - ARISE ROBISM
PDF
Future Trends - Recycling - Refrigerants
PPTX
Environment (1).pptx climate change and global warming along with sustainability
PPT
Ozone & Depletion
PPT
LECTURE 2 OZONE LAYER DEPLETION.ppt
PPT
"Climate Change and Shipping": Title: Climate Change and Shipping
PPTX
Air Pollution
Protecting the atmosphere
Montreal Protocol and its causes to the Environment.pptx
montrealprotocol-130712150348-phpapp02 (1).pptx
Refrigerant Preso 2009 Revised 10 16 2009.pptx
The depleting of the ozone layer
Contemporary environmental issues and solutions in modern world by Garima Ta...
Montreal Protocol and Ozone Layer Depletion
cfc and its protocol to reduce its usage
Hallow or Hollow fight for Climate-Story of HFCs
ozone depletion and business
CE102-Module2_ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES ECOSYSTEM ENVIRONMENT.pdf
What Is Ozone Layer Destruction
Presentationv1 Part1
Ozone depletion - ARISE ROBISM
Future Trends - Recycling - Refrigerants
Environment (1).pptx climate change and global warming along with sustainability
Ozone & Depletion
LECTURE 2 OZONE LAYER DEPLETION.ppt
"Climate Change and Shipping": Title: Climate Change and Shipping
Air Pollution
Ad

Montreal protocol1

  • 1. Submitted to: Prof. A.A.Napolean Submitted by:- Akash Chandwani – 12BCE0133 R.V.Kartick – 12BME0357 Deepak Kumar Singh – 12BCE0534 Milan Manjunath Sehnai – 12BCH0059 EVS Project on -
  • 2. 1. Introduction 2. Adjustments and Amendments 3. Ozone layer 4. UV-Radiations 5. Discovery and Research 6. Ozone Depleting Substances 7. Montreal Protocol 8. Provisions of Montreal protocol 9. Management Plans 10. Impact on CFC’s and it’s Phase out management plan 11. Impact on HCFC’s and it’s Phase out management plan 12. Implementation in US. 13. What if there were no Montreal Protocol??
  • 3. Introduction  Montreal Protocol popularly known as Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer.  It is a protocol to the Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer.  Main aim is to eliminate the substances that are responsible for the ozone depletion.
  • 4. Adjustments and Amendments Montreal Protocol has been either adjusted and/or amended in –  London 1990  Copenhagen 1992  Vienna 1995  Montreal 1997  Beijing 1999
  • 6. Antarctica Ozone Depletion: Formation of the hole near the south pole in the Ozone layer
  • 7. Why is ozone useful?  Ozone is a protective layer that absorbs the very energetic radiations (UV) falling on the earth.
  • 10. UV-Radiations UV- Radiations capable of penetrating the nitrogen is divided into three categories  UV-A ( λ = 400–315 nm)  UV-B ( λ = 315–280 nm)  UV-C ( λ = 280–100 nm) only extremely short or vacuum UV (10–100 nm) is screened out by nitrogen.
  • 11. UV-C  It is very harmful to all living beings.  It is entirely screened out by a combination of O2 (< 200 nm) and O3 (> about 200 nm) by around 35 kilometres (115,000 ft) altitude.  This type of radiation doesn’t reach the earth surface.
  • 12. UV-B  UV-B radiation can be harmful to the skin and is the main cause of sunburn.  Excessive exposure can also cause genetic damage, resulting in problems such as skin cancer.  The ozone layer is very effective at screening out UV-B.  UV-B, particularly at its longest wavelengths, reaches the surface
  • 13. UV-A  Ozone is transparent to most UV-A.  So most of this type of longer wavelength reaches the surface, and becomes the primary type of UV from the Sun to do so.  less harmful to DNA. although it may still potentially cause indirect genetic damage in skin
  • 15. Discovery and Research In 1974-nobel prize winners Mario Molina and Sherwood Rowland discover that CFC molecules were stable enough to remain in the atmosphere until they got up into the middle of the stratosphere where they would finally be broken down by ultraviolet radiation releasing a chlorine atom.
  • 16. Ozone Depleting Compounds  Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs)  Halons  Carbon tetrachloride,  Methyl chloroform  Hydrobromofluorocarbons (HBFCs)  Hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs)  Methyl bromide  Bromochloromethane (BCM)
  • 18. Montreal-Protocol  It is an international treaty designed to protect the ozone layer by phasing out the production of numerous substances believed to be responsible for ozone depletion.  The treaty is structured around several groups of halogenated hydrocarbons that have been shown to play a role in ozone depletion. All of these ozone depleting substances contain either chlorine or bromine.
  • 19.  For each group, including group ST, the treaty provides a timetable on which the production of those substances must be phased out and eventually eliminated  It was agreed on 16 September 1987 and entered into force on 1 January 1989.  It is also ratified by 197 states and the European Union.
  • 20. The Montreal Protocol - Provisions  Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), halons, carbon tetrachloride, and methyl chloroform- were to be phased out by 2000 (2005 for methyl chloroform)  Freeze at 1986 levels in mid 1989 and 20% cut in 1993  Production and consumption of CFC-11, CFC-12, CFC-113, CFC-114, CFC- 115 were to be reduced by 50% of the 1986 levels by 1998  Production of halon-1211, halon-1301 and halon-2402 were to be brought back to 1986 levels by 1992
  • 21. Management Plan  CFCs Phase-out Management Plan  CFC Phasing out plan  Regularly checked by bodies  Also checks the emission of halon 1211, 1301, 2402; CFCs 13, 111, 112, etc.  Carbon tetrachloride was given the special attention.
  • 22. Products Containing CFCs  Coolants (in refrigerator, AC)  Propellants (in Pressurized cans, Rockets)  Solvents for cleaning electronics  Blowing agent for manufacture of foam
  • 23. Why is CFC harmful to us?  CFC gas is not at all harmful to humans but its harmful to the Ozone layer.  The life time of CFC gas is very long, about 5200yrs. There is no way to destroy them. It has no way to go. It directly goes up to the ozone and damages it.
  • 25. Impact of Montreal protocol on CFCs  If all parties continue to comply, ozone layer expected to fully recover by 2050.  Montreal and subsequent agreements obliged parties to phase out most harmful CFCs (used in aerosols, refrigerants, foams, solvents) by 1996; with phase-out of by 2010 of less active CFCs. Most halons were phased out by 1994.  98% of all chemicals covered by the protocol were phased out by 2009.
  • 26. Management plans  Hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs) Phase-out Management Plan (HPMP)  Freezing time = 2013  Reducing time = 2015 This includes the pase out of  CFCl3 (CFC-11)  CF2Cl2 (CFC-12)  C2F3Cl3 (CFC-113)  C2F4Cl2(CFC-114)  C2F5Cl (CFC-115)
  • 27. Impact of Montreal Protocol on HCFCs.  Used as the first major replacement for CFCs, especially in refrigerants for air conditioning.  By 2013, all parties must freeze consumption and production of HCFCs, and start reducing by 2015.  Developed countries must complete 99.5 phase-out by 2020 nd 100% by 2030. Developing countries must complete 99.5 % by 2030 and 100% by 2040.  In U.S., HCFC production down 65% by 1/1/2010. On track to 90% cut by 1/1/2015 and 99.5% cut by 1/1/2020.
  • 28. Management plans  Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs)  HFCs are the substitutes of the CFCs and HCFCs.  It’s produced mostly in developed countries.  It does not harm Ozone layer.  But it is responsible for Green House Effect as it traps huge amount of infrared radiations from the sun.
  • 29. Earlier Challenges  Cost of replacing CFCs was the key hurdle that parties had to overcome.  By 1987 it was less costly for USG, Japan, Canada to ban CFCs, as all three had already banned CFCs in aerosol cans.  Harder for Japan and EU, who threatened to veto. Also harder USSR, could not afford to fund research to find alternatives.  Also opposed by China, India, Brazil anticipating massive CFC production in coming decade.  Keys to compromise were agreement from industrialized countries to help developing countries find alternatives, and agreement on delaying phase-out deadlines for developing countries
  • 30. Mechanisms for Implementation  Multilateral Fund: 2009-2011 budget = $490 million.  Annual reporting obligations  Implementation Committee  Adjustment provision  Grace period for developing countries
  • 31. World map showing the countries that have signed the protocol and that have not
  • 32. Montreal protocol under action: importance of 1996 phase-out.
  • 33. Funds as a challenge to Montreal Protocol.
  • 34. Implementation in US  U.S. already banned Freon (CFC) in 1978  “Clean Air Act of 1990” implemented Montreal protocol and gave EPA oversight and enforcement role.  To support phase-outs, EPA has approved over 300 alternatives to ozone depleting substances.  Other measures: tax policy: taxes on production of ODSs and tax incentives to industry to develop alternatives; labeling of ODS-containing products; identifying safer alternatives.  EPA allows exemptions to industries facing technical challenges to finding alternatives, e.g. medical inhalers.
  • 35. Key Achievements  Truly global participation  Elimination of ozone depleting substances  Healing the ozone layer  Supporting the developing countries  High rates of compliance  Health benefits  Climate change benefits  Global recognition  2010 phase out milestone
  • 36. Achievements  It has been adopted and implemented world wide.  The two treaties have been ratified by 197 states and the European Union making them the most widely ratified treaties in United Nations history.
  • 37. Benefits  It is believed that if the international agreement is adhered to, the ozone layer is expected to recover by 2050.
  • 38. What if there were no Montreal Protocol??  No CFC ban  There would have been 50% ozone layer depletion in northern hemisphere, 70% in southern hemisphere, by 2050.  130 million more cases of cataracts; 19 million more cases of non-melanoma skin cancer; 1.5 million more cases of melanoma skin cancer. Which would overall cost $4.2 trillion.
  • 39. Thank you let's make earth a better place to live in