Natural theory in world politics

Natural theory
Axioms of vital time and space

By: Mouloud Hayoun

1

This theory:

Includes, for the first time the social phenomenon and especially at the politics field in the
area of systematic study of natural scientific "causality and quantity".

Here are some translated excerpts of my natural theory from Arabic original
manuscript, in the field of political thought and civilization, which contains a new
perception on scientific foundation of human social, cultural and political
interactions, I hope to shape a solution, even though theoretically, for many
tragedies faced by humankind today, wars and economic turmoil ... Etc.

The erroneous perceptions of social systems sourced and emerged problems
across the various political levels, including the international anarchy which has
devoted reality of aggression and wars that did not subside.

How that:

This research provides a new distinguished scientific proposals on scientific
methodology, such, social interactions, across their human life structural levels
must be studied.

It began with a simple observation, but evolved over the study and profound
reflections to a complemented theory, that explained the causal relations
between some integrated variables of humanitarian social phenomenon, in
coordination with hidden assumptions of natural and human life, exhibited for the
first time, as a consistent scientific model.

2

The natural theory

The beginning is that I attempted to discover the assumptions of, (article
components interactions), and actually I reached that goal, and identified three
basic axioms:

Differentiation _ Complementarities _ Alteration

I called those as the Axioms of Vital Time and Place, designed to set up what
I also called the Natural theory in cosmic and human interactions.

“Cosmic and human”, said despite the vein material epistemology, which was my
first focus attention, because what happened after this, is that I implemented the
projection of the axioms on system of human interactions, I reached very
important results, because I as turning to assess one of the sociological concepts
I found myself going redrafting it with a corrective way, when I subjected it to
the Differentiation _ integration _ transformation formula.

Hence I do reformulate concepts: culture and civilization _ ethics _ issues of
authenticity and modernity_ positivism & rationalism _ the philosophy of history,
as I managed to formulate mathematical equations to measure the strength of
social relations network, and select partial anomalous social system and public
order, and development, focused particularly on politics and international
relations, exactly, this was the first study, the first axis of the exploratory
process of natural theoretical mechanisms, and dealt with these concepts under
the title: Entries or Gates because I intend to expand on in future, separately, for
their importance.

And because politics and international relations is the core field concerned with
vital time and place axioms applications, and that the main problem related to
epistemological errors in the construction of international politics, which results a
world of injustice, conflict and wars, I implemented a projection of the theory's
axioms on the subject of international anarchy, as a second Academic study.

and I chose twofold the Iranian nuclear situation and Syrian crisis to explore
methods of international policy, led by the United States, in collusion with the
ambitious regional powers such as Iran and Russia, in order to proof the
positivist - rationalist misconceptions and its effects on international community.

The policy that want to implying the mechanisms of international anarchy,
although nature according to the axioms of vital time and place vow to impose
straight socio-political system through various levels, beyond all hardships of
international anarchy.

3

The axioms of vital time and place:

Article level: known that any system is a set of units tied by relations, defined
by laws.

The units are in varying levels of universe, galaxies, solar groups, to components
of the planets, to the components of the atom: protons, electrons and a nucleus.

For example, the solar system, made up of the Sun as a nucleus carry or contain
an enormous amount of energy provide the planets swim in its orbit with light
and heat.

This is one of the relations of kernel dependencies that cannot be flushed from its
orbit or increase or decrease the speed around, or move them either closer or
far, and these are the laws that determine the relationship between the solar
modules, and any departure from these laws carry the loss of other units such as
Earth.

Since the universe as we mentioned is clustered system levels, we can say that
the analytical model of the solar system applies to all levels of the cosmic
systems.

Conclusion of this first analysis of the basic system of the universe is that
corruption or bugs in any level of cosmic order may refer to:

-Deviation from any law defining the relationship between the system units, as
approaching the Earth from the Sun or Mars from orbit deflection.

-Remove the system unit such a deprotonating or damaging the ozone layer in
the Earth.

In that case, the relationships between the system units remove to a case of
collision or chaos or corruption, after it was the case of beautiful harmonic
functionalism.

Here we define the essence of the life of the system, and is a State of
differentiation & complementation between units.

The differentiation (for example) between properties of protons and electrons is
important, for the aim that each of these units provide their vital supply to the
atom's system in order to keep the survival of their interactions, and so all need
for survival to save survival of differentiated units for a goal of a good functional
interaction procedure, To occurring complementation, which provides safety of
the object's system in the universe.

4

And that any exclusion of any unit from his system will impoverish it one of their
causes of interaction, and the fallout from corruption begins in the object, and
then, this degenerated object which is differentiated will impoverish other similar
objects interacting with them, because they need the healthy existence of every
unit in the wide system.

Hence, in this bad situation, devastating all of the material system levels, could
lead to the lack of those objects, breaking down integration at all levels of the
cosmic order, corrupting the universe and moving towards loss, after the good
innate conception of the world.

Therefore, the need to maintain the innate system laws and maintain distinct
units of the system is the basis for the survival of the universe through systems
at all levels.

Another intuitive fact and logical evidence, demonstrating transformation axiom,
it is “Time”.

No life for universe and humankind if the time stops.

So time is the soul of the universe-legged interactions between his molecules, as
the spirit of man is his interactions energy, time is the divine energy which
stimulates interactive relations between physical units of existence, that shaped
on differentiation among the characteristics and complementation of their
functions until the universe get the harmony between the different levels of their
systems. And if the universe had not differentiated and integrated elements, so it
never needs time as energy of its life and existence.

Keep this fact in a time interactive elements of the universe and highlight
another important fact, which is that each interaction between units and systems
of the universe is the producer of a new situation or situations of interaction, it
means the functional integration between the distinct elements in a system will
result in their interaction the emergence of new units, a new interactive situation
between the distinct elements, and thus what is known "History".

This means that time is an outfitting and material particles in the universe, so
that builds relationships in every moment, surpassing physical relationship tick,
and so be in every moment new events, new photos, contrary to its
predecessors, but the principle of differentiation and complementation between
systems of the universe, as long as the time is supplying energy upon its
interactions.

Therefore, the natural cosmic order interact according to the following three
assumptions: complementation _ differentiation and transformation are the
axioms of vital time and place, or existential effects in the universe, that make it
alive, always overlap, interact and shift, and this makes us imagine natural
theory on cosmic interactions.

5

These three axioms of natural interaction are themselves based on other sub
assumptions, as follows:

1. The universe is a complex system of several units.

2. Units of the universe are systems as well.

3. Each unit consists of other cosmic units, consisting themselves systems.

4. The universe is built of several systems, varying levels, in a composing feature
from the atom to the cosmic structure.

5. Every system consists of the units characterized with two constants:

*-differentiation of characteristics

*-complementation in relationship.

6-Each system being thus formation, is a distinct unit, integrated with other
units, under the overlay as mentioned above.

7- Each universal unit needs complementation with differential unit, to ensure
their survival.

"The survival of any unit depends the survival of other units, with special
characteristics".

8- The interaction between overlapping units can only happen with time.

9_ Interactions make composite units /by time/ in the feature of an ever and
relative structure transformation: dismantling and integration.

6

From Physics to humankind

Object’s components are in a State of conflict or situation of
complementation?

That Marx says that parts of the article are in case of conflict, this is wrong,
because the article in its components appears as in integration, and the Marx
statement that parts of the article in conflict lead as his accumulations to
overcoming one element, is in fact awry of reality, and is a reflection of his initial
conviction based on recognized conflict as normal, resulting from a new situation
because of the accumulation of the relationship between the parts of the article
is the result of constant interactions between elements, So that the time factor
which provides energy of interaction for integrated physical fittings leads to
historical transformations of their reality, without any conflict, except for the
case of resistance when it faced a corrupt or aggressor unit .

The result:

The case of article and its transformations is a complementary combination
between interactive elements, and not a conflicting one, throughout history, and
so, the Marx's law of "looting robber" is not true perspective, physical element
does not require a wrestler and take away from its components, but the
interaction between integrated components lead to overlay properties and
components as functional structural situations in every moment of time, and this
is history.

Marx states that human history is a shifts due to permanent conflict between
layers leading to new relationships between them -and this is the Marxist
analysis- and that this conflict is material -causes and consequences-, however
our projections on the facts mentioned on how the interactions of human
compositions refute the idea of Marxism, because the relationship between
humanitarian gathered interactive elements is functionally complementary, and a
solid structure, given the differences of each element or group, in the framework
of social construction: they are not in conflict.

And perhaps to make Marx faulting here, is to add to thinking that physical
relationship is in struggles, he believed that private ownership of the means of
production is an abnormal phenomenon, and here his footsteps II, because the
characteristics of the physical element interactive with the rest of the elements in
its composition or function recognizes the principle of private property, because
amongst the physical article contains there is some richest and most powerful

7

elements than others interacting with them, and functions of some ones are
wider than the functions of some other elements.

And this physical evidence refutes the idea of historical dialectic in one hand and
makes us approach again on an important fact, that the political community is
based on differentiation of features and functions between its constituent parts,
integrated and mutant.

History is the continuous transformations of social structures.

positivism

Here we try to point out a very influential intellectual deviation on the
mechanism of social interaction, it is the August Comte's idea formed around the
three phases, when he thought that human societies cross it, until reaching a
state of maturity, "as he claimed".

Mechanism of differentiation and integration to refute that perception, because
human populations have a maturity since the first presence on the earth, they
reacts instinctively in accordance with the principle of differentiation
,complementation and transformation, and cannot fall outside the scope of this
activity.

And the origin of the error is when August Comte thought that sociological
system is interpreted in accordance with a method of social belief, the fact that
the creed is mutant, not fix, in wide range of believes.

Add that the innate, correct and proper origin of interpretation and
understanding of sociological system is a system of differentiation,
complementation and mutation, because it is hard in time and space and at all
levels of sociological organization, and even the heavenly religions provide
explicitly asserts for the axioms of vital of time and place.

The regulation of social relations by Comte loses positivism and rationality and
objectivity their methodological correct position from the beginning.

Social relations could not be addressed by one sociological unit values, or the
values of a number of units, whatever their size, to hold systematically and
epistemologically the social phenomenon must contain all social units in
existence, and this justifies the positivism, but be positivist connotation reflecting
the level of analysis dealt with the phenomenon on some aspects without assets,
this must see as deviation which caused human scourges.

8

Comte tried to come out from society mistaken beliefs causing the failure, by
stripping it from its sociological characteristic elements, used to interact with its
environment, and which constitute a whole dynamic interaction of cosmic
elements, that life cannot be without it , he wanted to develop a platform for
another world than humans, because the sociological identity elements, including
religion are substantive requirements, we cannot study social phenomenon
objectively and scientifically without it, like he wanted to study human life as
material life, this can't be, for the different properties, despite the similarity of
life axioms in their interactions.

Comte position influenced sociological theorizing and deviated it from the correct
methodological approach merits; he dealt with the limits of the surface level,
which in turn led to the exit of the sociological theory from its original scientific
function aimed at human service to subjugate him.

Development: the Common destiny

9

Projection from the: Axioms of vital time and space approach:

The only fixed laws in the world of social activity, including economic activity are
*axioms differentiation and complementary and transformation, and everything
below that of the doctrines and economic theories and ideologies fleeting with the
passage of time, and the proof of this is what some economists theorists noted, such
Ralston Saul who said:

“Grand economic theories rarely last more than a few decades. Some, if they are
particularly in tune with technological or political events, may make it to half a
century. Beyond that, little short of military force can keep them in place”.

He added:

“The wild open-market theory that died in 1929 had a run of just over thirty
years. Communism, a complete melding of religious, economic, and global
theories, stretched to seventy years in Russia and forty-five years in central
Europe, thanks precisely to the intensive use of military and police force.
Keynesianism, if you add its flexible, muscular form during the Depression to its
more rigid postwar version, lasted forty-five years. Our own Globalization, with
its technocratic and technological determinism and market idolatry, had thirty
years. And now it, too, is dead .

The interaction between components and across social unit and with its natural
surroundings and with other social units is an appliance that targeted an innate
social interactive movement trying to reach the landing situation of physical and
value gratification.

This is a deliberate movement , because there are substantive interaction forced
to social unity within the cosmic and human interactions controlled of fait
accompli such as climate, geography and soil and adjacent units ... ... ....Etc.

Access to case material gratification and value, or the deliberate interaction is
meant the process of obtaining the wishes or the needs of a social unit to access
to interactive comfort or happiness, and this is the statement of "Al-Farabi".

10

And can we express it by accessing case compatibility and harmony within the
unit as a combination with physical and humankind sphere.

Each sought to achieve this welfare is what we call development.

And “Al-farabi” States that the city or state which fail to achieve welfare or weak
State is a corrupt one, and this what we believe also in our natural development
theory. Because the weak perish political society on the one hand, and converts it
to an aggressor unit in its relationship with other units, it also undermines the
integration process, because vulnerable unit denied the rest of the units which
need her specialized production, by virtue of its gifted style of production.

But the concept of development when many political communities today is
contrary to this concept, because it is based on quantitative, States today trying
to get as much material production even if outnumbered they need, and what
might have overflowed dump him at sea, as some States are competing to build
the biggest Tower or wider mosque or the most prolific agricultural crop
regardless of his utility.

This quantitative understanding of development was awry for a development
that would benefit social unity and the rest of the other units, in need of healthy
development of each social unit.

H.Mercuse said: “consumer community products in order to product”.

And the proof of quantitative development concept no validity is the economic
crisis of 1929-depression-, despite huge US productivity machine crisis
happened, and this is proof that the production must have objectives sustained
by ethical value, and designed to meet social needs, and to direct production of
blocking rare, in other hand, quantitative production uncontrolled and brutal,
freedom deal get as a result a great crisis .

Guided "Keynes" the idea to organize the economic activity and the need for
State intervention to guide this activity, serving contingent harmony society of
America, and this is a great way to go to the qualitative development production

11

concept, but it was not enough, America today suffers from severe crisis in his
local qualitative production, because of a reason didn't notice him yet, and it is a
violation of the principle of complementarity with other international
contingents, the wheat surplus us throw is an error example, which will return to
hit USA, that the principle of international integration in accordance with the
principle of differentiation And integration to achieve or make each State to
achieve consistency and harmony of the rest of the other units, by providing
what you need, than let excess wheat-producing to other unit, who needs this
excess.

For example, Somali hunger and needs wheat target at sea will disintegrate on
the American economy, and is exactly as far as requests from States which do
not have the technology, and which at the same time the magnitude of the oil
revenue to raise their level of consumption of Western products to help them out
of the current financial crisis.

So the development concept of harmony is not restricted to the unit internally
only and is complementary process necessary between all social units through
the various levels, and only weak any unit will lead to hardships for the rest of
the units.

Now debt exceeded the value of local production and reduced the credit rating of
the United States and the euro zone, and the global economy is threatened,
some specialists attributed to two reasons in favor of a natural theory based on
axioms of vital time and location:

• Capital turned the principle of providing opportunities for individuals to work on
its acquisition of the wealth of other-any weak or corrupt States such as Algeria,
which put into Western sovereign funds, raise 150 billion dollars without really
interest – and not creating wealth, in other hand.

• Expert considers that international economic relations characterized by
systemic, and therefore, if crisis struck the United States would be a cosmic
repercussions, and that's what happened.

This statements witnessed and proof deeply over the credibility of the analysis,

12

according to the axioms of vital time and space to natural theory in
international economic phenomenon that I founded the principles and
assumptions, and in next discussion, I'm going to demonstrate the credibility of
this approach in the analysis of international political phenomenon.

International relations
The war against nature

13

The real international conflict today is not a conflict between the poles even
though media devoted this allusion , the real world politics conflict is between
nature which want to refer people to peace and security mechanisms over the
international community, respect for differences and complementarities between
its units on the one camp and at the opposite side there is a rival opponent to
this natural direction, wants to curb the natural world path, to fabricate false
mechanisms in order to formulate the international life, as establishing an
international strategy, advantaged by conflict and suspicion in others and not
feel safe, with a simple aims is to stay and to keep the international situation
under control.

The Syrian crisis is the ground that explain clearly this view.

Nature vs international anarchy

America found itself after the cold war, just like an element in ecosystem, which
lost one of its necessary compounds, bringing each pattern is threatened with
disappearing.

On the one hand the Geopolitical and geoeconomic transformation after the Cold
War led to prospective endangered chaos, and on the other hand the
mechanisms of rational realist security strategy of America and its allies led them
to devote this Chaos to a corrupted end.

And through the procedures of the new international order the world as a whole
became in danger because of these two elements.

We are in a conflicting situation between two models each wants to impose itself
as an alternative to regulate human life through a strategic management of
international interactions

The first form is the realist positivism of US foreign policy and its appliers over
the world

And the second model is not the product of human rationality, but it is from the
nature which exposes their alternative mechanisms today, through organizational
security dilemma exhibition, by the emergence of a dominant force, for the first
time in history.

And the theater of this conflict are geopolitical ,economic and theoretical
transformations, addressed from America and its allies which tries to push or
hinder the strong natural transformations that want to refer international

14

community to the natural condition, and this struggle appear now in the
organizational anarchy appeared within the form of international relations.

And focusing more on the core of the conflict, we find that values are strategic
objective of belligerents:

- The new international system and globalization wants through
mechanisms of transforming the human being into a machine consumers
and Communities to markets, according to the status of the background of
rational positivist’s mechanism, where the personalized sociological
specificities of Nations will be melted.

- Nature, want to force the opposite in devoting Privacy for International
actors, and build relationships in accordance with the logic of the
international community and global governance, founded on efficient and
respected participation of actors and the whole of international units,
leading to global integration.

It is a conflict between nature and logic automation, nature wants freedom
and dignity for all, either the mechanism is stereotyping the life of
majority according to the method which held the goals controlled by the
dominant actors over the majority.

The means of this conflict are strategic security schemes at the
international level.
And therefore we will try to demonstrate the assumption that the United
States found itself as global dominant after the Cold War realized itself in
organizational security dilemma, and it does not knew its destination, and
try to face this situation with mechanisms which led to
Cede domination's profit, and though relatively, in following strategy:

United States security strategy centered on:

• fit the capitalist world.
• National domestic stability: and both are by creating external threat.
• Standardization of third world in accordance with the mechanisms of the
market economy and globalization.
• "Deterrence – reassurance" towards the ambitious regional States, in
twofold objective:

devoting a sense of external threat through the work of the United States
to create a new rival Tycoon includes such States, in accordance with the

15

agreement to split the international geopolitical interests, and at the same
time, America rest over geopolitical regulatory dilemma of international
security, which occurred after the collapse of the Soviet Union, such
becoming the international force configuration interactions uncontrolled,
with unknown destination.

And this strategy has implications for the formation of an international
community security, most serious fallout than cold war because:

- Cold-war polarization effect on International actors Privacy but under
national titles which relatively respected cultural specificities, but now
there is no ideological polarization, but starting to show new security
impact of polarity within the Syrian crisis, centered on China ,Russia and
Shiite Crescent.
And this alliance is not ideological, but it is the alliance of the last resisters
against democratic alteration, and matched by what appears on it "free
world" or "democratic" ,which aims to achieve a new world order in the
rest of the world.

- And the aim of his dictates pole rival is to keep his authoritarian units
systems, with regional and national ambitions, which don't want to cede
"its kingdoms" for Western strategy.

This fact naturally leads to disrupt the normal development of political
communities of the Alliance, because it will deprive him from Mechanisms
of differentiation, integration and transition as axioms of development,
because of tyranny.

And on the other hand would be political communities of the free world to
process automated profiling in the context of the new international order
of globalization and market economy.

This was the main aspects of the current world politics race, which is not
between nations or cultures or ideologies, or even economic interests, but
it’s a hidden conflict between natural sociopolitical rules versus realist,
rational, positivist false conceived assumptions.

16

Syrian crisis, within Nature/International anarchy
clash

Everyone acknowledges that the United States position was strange towards the
bloody events in Syria, timing and whole achieved manner that West intervene in
Libya, which had a similar mode for what happens in Syria makes us keep many
question marks.

And so, I'll have to analyze this problem at a broader level of geographical
constituency of Syrian conflict, beyond geographical boundaries of this country,
because the deduction of the bloody war and massacres that exterminate Syrian
people cannot be understood, except by addressing conflict on broad
international level too.

And since the issue is addressed at the level of America and Europe on the one
hand and, on the other hand, Russia, Iran and China, we rather must touching
nature of the relationship between these two major thrusts in control of the
situation.

And initially focusing on the Iranian nuclear controversy as an analysis tool for
access to identify the nature of the relationship between all these conflict-related
actors.

“Iran is "strategic goal" of the United States”, the report of the well-known
journalist Seymour Hirsch Peter Phillip from "DW" after the invasion of Iraq,
warning in his commentary of the logic of war and force in American politics.

But the threat was not known implementation until writing these lines, that
lasted more than nine years, why procrastinated America in its military campaign
against Iran?

Sure that US State taxed in its occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan, they faced
great pressure to get out of this mud, and it drained financially and humanly,
with very much effect on its economy, these factors were important reasons for
not providing US war on Iran, as a rational alternative, but these considerations
may not be compelling, on the grounds that American realism does not give
consideration to any matter as comparable or above its national security, which
is based on the global geopolitical situation, and especially, US will never Allow to
any nation in the Middle East or in Neighborhood area, having a military
ambition to transcend the Israeli one's superiority , and that's what was said in
President Barack Obama's address, so we'll try to de-mystify this US policy.

17

Key turning point was the victory of the Iranian presidential election, in which
Rafsanjani falls, and boarded their hard-line conservative.

This shift resulted the Declaration on Iran is determined to resume sensitive
nuclear activities, and indifference to convert its nuclear file to the Security
Council threatens to escalate a new major international crisis.

The Iranian ruling elite are trying to cope with threats and greater regional role.

This Iranian escalation came after the arrival of Ahmadi nejad to power and fall
moderate reformers who distinguished themselves in their dealings with the
European Union, especially with regard to the nuclear file.

This Iranian alteration has impacted on the European position, which was
somewhat lenient with the Iranians, and it perhaps was the shift which served
the United States aims toward European foreign policy, fearing the independent
European policy toward Iran, since years ago.

And what happened will strengthen American gambit to put pressure on Iran,
unless they cede their strategic military superiority ambition in the strategic
area.

And perhaps this partial interpretation demonstrates some features of US policy
toward Iran, but that followed remained vague, because political behavior and
statements, as well as events have not gone in one direction.

Iran, which helped the United States in invading two neighboring countries which
are Afghanistan and Iraq, and put under bet that national security, dare in the
same time to the United States and Europe, by draft nuclear threat to US
interests in the region.

In addition, the principle of allowing international observers access to Iranian
nuclear facilities swung between acceptance and rejection, not to mention the
conflicting Iranian statements every time about cooperation or objection to
Western demands, this western behavior was not the same toward Sadam’s
Iraqian regime.

And it’s important to include here the Iranian statement on 25-03-2012 “ end of
dictates era from the United States, and its preaching trusteeship”.

And on the other side:

• An important statement of American foreign policy toward Ira:

A CIA report which said that Iran halted its nuclear weapons program in 2003.

This report published by the New York Times added that US intelligence analysts
believe that there is no compelling evidence that Iran had decided to produce a

18

nuclear bomb, the same conclusion reached in 2007, confirmed that Iran had
abandoned its nuclear program.

This is a radical change from the previous intelligence assessments that Iran is
moving towards making a nuclear bomb.

The last national intelligence assessment is a formal consensus of all 16
American intelligence agencies.

• However, the newspaper emphasizes that there is no difference between US
and Israeli intelligence that Iran was enriching nuclear fuel and infrastructure
necessary to make a nuclear bomb, but US intelligence believes that Iran has not
resumed its military which apparently stopped in 2003.

However, we note on this inconsistency and not set in the declarations of the
parties that it's linked to regional events and issues of interests to both sides, we
try to deduce the parameters of this variant through the issue of the Syrian
revolution.

Iranian/ American compatibility on the fate of the
Syrian revolution
In Obama Romney Corresponding, both said: “America will not intervene at
Syria; America will help Israel against any threat”.

The Syrian crisis now, shows that the world is establishing a new bipolarity,
comprising the United States, on the one hand and Russia and China bloc and
Iran on the other hand, after sparring that took place in the Security Council on
the issue of Syria, which ended in favor of Russian / Chinese veto, booster to
their ally Syria, but what does this have to do with the problematic topic of our
research: the Iranian nuclear issue and US relationship?

The answer lies in that the Russian-Chinese veto was in the service of Iran's
Shiite Crescent regional project leader, a strategic dimension to its interests in
the Middle East, which Russia counts as an area of vital catalysts to them, such
as the Russian military base stationed in Syrian Banyas, which is hold a vital
security position.

Furthermore Iran would create problems for Russia if they did not help their ally
(the Syrian regime) in his problem with the Security Council.

These arrangements designed Russian-Chinese pole allies, leaded by Iran, lord of
Shiite Crescent, what their officers told in clear that pro-Iranian entities in the
Arabic region obeyed them order, such a statement is a declaration of the

19

exclusivity of this vital area to Iran, who prevents interference, and arranged
through this Declaration the Office dealing with allies and adversaries, thus Iran
occurs interests and make concessions, and that's what happened in the Security
Council on the issue of abuses of the Syrian regime's Security Division against
The public revolution, which erupted in the midst of the Arab spring 2011.

The dealing relationship between this Poles is transitive, America waives for
Russia and China regarding the Syrian issue for Iranian interests bellowed to the
Russian-Chinese Alliance, and this was confirmed by the 26.04.2012's Obama's
statement when he promised to Russia a security concessions, if he’ll be re-
elected

This statement also was suspicious, at the height of the Syrian revolution and
when 10-05-2012 Damascus bombings attributed by the Syrian regime to Al-
Qaeda, authorized State spokeswoman Victoria Noland confirmed that Al-Qaeda
is active in Syria, supporting the already US. Defense Secretary view about the
same issue

sure, the other party also will benefit from this understanding, in accordance with
its own strategy in the Middle East region, the United States expressed
agreement or complacency before the Syrian issue, because its strategy in the
region requires not the downfall of Assad, fearing the arrival of the forces
opposing Israel in the region, and therefore the United States Rhetorically
manifests its support for the Syrian revolution, and deals in the same time a
procedural work to facilitate the task of Russia in support of Assad.

And may begin the vision clear after US and West contradictions when Jeffrey
Feltman says in the same day that “the United States would adjust the strategic
concepts, commensurate with Arab spring”, and he said: “any failure of
transitional stages will lead to the destabilization of the region”.

It may settle the confusion after the Hula massacre (committed at the end of
May 2012, which exceeded their victims a hundred of dead), amid compatibility
between America and Russia over the fate of the conflict in Syria as the following
press report:

The New York Times said the administration of President Barack Obama is
seeking to persuade Russia to resolve the Syrian crisis basing on the experience
of Yemen where President Ali Abdullah Saleh resigned, but government
personnel remained in power.

Quoting officials had cited that plan calls for a political settlement could satisfy
the Syrian opposition teams, but may keep items from the Government of
President Bashar Al-Assad their positions, noting that the plan depends on the
approval of Russia after its opposition to offset Assad.

A US official said that the United States is ready to reassure Russia that it would
continue to maintain close relations with Syria after Assad, adding, “We know

20

that Russia wants to keep its influence on Syria, our goal is to make the situation
stable and not eliminate the Russian effect.

However, officials said that although Obama did not reject Medvedev's proposal
on the adoption of the Yemeni solution, but did not approve it.

They said that even if Putin agreed the US plan, may have disagreement about
the definition of the Yemeni model and how it is implemented.

And we will understand this setback reference in US dealing with the merits of
the Syrian crisis, which is contrary to its position in the crisis in the similar Libyan
one, through its strategy with the Syrian regime forces contain, Iran and Russia.

The United States, and at the height of its support for Saddam Hussein in his war
against Iran, noted the President Ronald Reagan's involvement in the Iran gate
scandal, which revealed the involvement of American arms sales to Iran, if the
water gate scandal led to the resignation of Nixon, Reagan as a head of Iran gate
remained, so that the foreign policy for Americans do not affect American citizens
mainly affecting internal conditions associated with living style.

on the other side America has got support Iran in invading Afghanistan and Iraq,
in accordance with arrangements concluded with Iraq delivered to Iran and break
the Taliban opposed to Iran, despite significant animosity between the two
countries.

And the secret of this understanding, despite the absence of Iranian American
friendliness between them, are arrangements of convenience for all parties, and
that:

• international actors: like the Syrian people, Taliban and Saddam's former
regime have a global strategy over the issue of Jerusalem and Palestine in
General, (radical demand and extraterritorial, viewed as defiant toward the West
which is in support of Israel) while Iran has a regional agenda over the Middle
East, and not to controlling Central Asia, although it is a natural geostrategic
prolongation of Iran, witnessing Shiite Azerbaijan's problems with them, let
alone considered Central Asia the area of influence for Russia supporting Iran,
and this is the matter of the deal between both of them

As America fights all its international interests threatening actors in the Middle
East and on top of that Israeli security interests and Arab oil, they prefer to face
owners of endangered agendas against its interests on the one hand, and dealing
understandings with those are away from threat to its strategic interests in the
region, and although they have some economic and ideological territorial
ambitions.

21

Natural theory in world politics

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Viewers also liked (20)

Similar to Natural theory in world politics (20)

More from Mouloud Mohammed Hayoun (17)

Recently uploaded (20)

Natural theory in world politics