Next Generation Preprint Service
Download as PPTX, PDF1 like459 views
The document discusses the evolution of scholarly communication, emphasizing the need for a next-generation preprint service that fosters innovation and community governance. It outlines the limitations of the current model, which is heavily for-profit and controlled, and proposes a vision where preprints enable direct access to data and knowledge synthesis. Key considerations for achieving this vision include appropriate governance, incentives for participation, and the development of user-friendly technology.
Next Generation Preprint Service
- 1. Next Generation Preprint Service Philip E. Bourne PhD, FACMI 1
- 2. Next Generation Preprint Service & Beyond Philip E. Bourne PhD, FACMI 2
- 3. Who am I representing and what is my bias? • I am representing myself NOT NIH, but, after May 1, possibly the University of Virginia • Keen supporter of ASAPbio • Former President International Society for ComputationalBiology • Total data parasite • Unnatural interest in scholarly communication • Co-founded and founding EIC PLOS Computational Biology – OA advocate • Co-Director Protein Data Bank • Became an active researcher in scholarly communication 3
- 4. Scholarly Communication - Current Landscape • Largely a for-profit business with limited input into that business from the producers of scholarship • Open access (OA) constrains costs but also shifts the cost from consumer to producer • Full accessibility for non-OA is constrained/controlled • Funders able to influence the landscape eg PubMed Central • Sustainable! • An analog system functioning in a digital world – aka not born digital 4
- 5. If you were inventing scholarly communication today it would look completely different than what it is …. Preprints are a step in the evolution of scholarship Preprints offer scholarly communication a fresh start for they are born digital 5
- 6. I just told you the why, now consider the what and the how? But wait… what is the end game ... Where do we want to be in 10 years? 6
- 7. 1. A link brings up figures from the paper 0. Full text of paper stored in a database – one view 2. Clicking the paper figure retrieves data from the PDB which is analyzed 3. A composite view of journal and database content results One Hypothetical End Point • Paper is one attributable view of the knowledge • User clicks on a static image • Metadata and data provide direct further analysis - an executable paper • Private and public annotations revealed • Selecting a feature forms a query for yet further knowledge • That knowledge rendered as a knowledge graph rather than a paper 4. The composite view has links to pertinent blocks of literature text and back to the PDB 1. 2. 3. 4. PLoS Comp. Biol. 2005 1(3) e34 7
- 8. Why a preprint service is an important step • Preprints have many advantages you have heard about already today - there are incentives • If publishers were going to do it – they would have done it already • Provides unfettered content (in principle) • That content is owned and governed by the community • Provides a playground from which the unimaginable can happen 8
- 9. So what do we need to consider to get there? • Appropriate governance • Incentives • Accessibility of content • Legal • Technical • Ease of use • Sustainability • Open and collaborative • This is too much for one group to accomplish – the effort must be open for all to contribute with appropriate moderation – crowd source model 9
- 10. How do we get there? • ASAPbio governance • Incentives: • Funders – better scientific evaluation • Scientists – timely and greater dissemination of their work • Publishers/others – new business models for value added services • All – improved forms of comprehension eg visualization, aggregation, distillation • Accessibility • Licenses that retain copyright ownership but give unfettered access with attribution 10
- 11. How do we get there? • Accessibility • Technical • Appropriately tagged content • Machine readable content • Appropriate APIs to provide full access • Sustainability • Over time a value proposition for funders • Tools that lower costs for publishers – savings passed on • Open and collaborative • Knowledge becomes a community responsibility • Innovation can come from anywhere 11
- 12. The Beyond – one hypothetical scenario – if you liked x you may like y • You having submitted a significant number of preprints to the preprint service, software from a collaborative development effort has analyzed your submissions and built a researcher profile. • That profile is matched against each incoming submission to the preprint service and periodically rank orders and reports those most relevant to you – a knowledge push. PubMed related articles feature on steroids. • Steroids because methods benefit from the work of a large community of developers. 12
- 13. In Summary • An appropriate preprint service is a framework for innovation • When the World Wide Web took hold no one perceived the rise of social networks and their impact. Likewise few saw the implications for fake news when everyone has a voice and an ear • It is the responsibility of the scientific community at large and the societies that represent those communities to make the most responsible use of innovations in scholarly communication, including preprints 13
Editor's Notes
- #8: 7