SlideShare a Scribd company logo
No Child Left Behind Act: What’s in the New Education Reform Law
No Child Left Behind There are three key hallmarks of the new bill:  1. Testing 2. Accountability  3. Flexibility
No Child Left Behind Under the new law, all states must now hold students and districts accountable for student proficiency gains by subgroups in math, reading, and eventually, science.
NCLB: Testing and Accountability States must ensure all students are tested annually in reading and math by the 2005-06 school year.  By 2007, all states must administer an annual assessment in science in at least one grade level: 3-5, 6-9, and 10-12.
NCLB: Testing and Accountability States must set--then meet—adequate yearly progress (AYP) targets toward the goal of having all children meet proficiency levels in core subjects by the 2013-14 school year.  Schools that fail to meet AYP face sanctions, including providing supplemental services, transportation to other schools, and restructuring.
NCLB: Highly Qualified Teachers By the end of 2005-06 school year, the law requires all states ensure that every classroom teacher is “highly qualified”. To meet this definition, teachers must be certified or licensed; hold a bachelor’s degree; and have demonstrated competencies in his or her teaching area, to be determined by the state.
NCLB: Highly Qualified Teachers To meet the law’s requirement, States (and districts) must develop a measurable plan to increase the number of all core subject teachers who are highly qualified. This plan must include an increase in the number of teachers who are participating in high quality professional development.
NCLB: Teacher Quality Accountability Based on this plan, after 2 years without meeting annual goals/steps the state has determined to increase the number of highly qualified teachers, the district must develop a strict improvement plan and the SEA must provide assistance. After 3 years, SEA steps in to provide professional development.
NCLB: Title II Part A Teacher Quality Grants To help districts and states ensure that every teacher is “highly qualified,” Congress created Title II Part A funds. Over $2.8 billion has been made available to states and school districts nationwide under Title II Part A, during the 2002-2003 school year.
NCLB: Title II Part A $2.85 Billion by Formula to States (35 percent based on school age population, 65 based on low income schools) 1% goes to State Administration, then 2.5% goes for State Agency for Higher Ed Partnership Grants, and  2.5% go for State Programs, then 95% reserved for subgrants to districts
NCLB: Title II, Part A State Agency for Higher Ed Partnerships Similar to Eisenhower Higher Education Grant Program –  NO  M/S set-aside FY 2002 approximately $70 million FY 2001 (Eisenhower SAHE State Grants) approximately $70 million
NCLB: Title II, Part A State Level Programs (Funding can be used for professional development) FY 2002 approximately $70 million FY 2001 (Eisenhower State-Level Programs) approximately $12 million
NCLB: For LEAs To Receive Title II , Part A Funds  95 percent of Title II funds are reserved as subgrants for districts.  Districts must apply to the state education agency for Title II funds. First, the district must conduct a NEEDS ASSESSMENT of the teaching force. (Applications for FY2002 are already in – new guidance may require needs assessments for FY2003 or future applications.) *Teachers must be involved in the  needs assessment!
NCLB: For LEAs To Receive Title II, Part A Funds  Using the results of the needs assessment, districts must develop a LOCAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN which will determine the activities the district will undertake to ensure ALL teachers are highly qualified. This plan must be included in the application to the state for Title II funds. (Applications for FY2003 funds) *Teachers must be involved in the Local Improvement Plan!
Local Improvement Plan Must Include: The results of the needs assessment Activities the district will carry out with funds, including professional development How the activities are based on scientifically based research and why they are expected to increase student achievement
Part A Local Improvement Plan Must Include: How district will ensure the professional development needs of teachers will be met How the district will use the funds to increase the percentage of highly qualified teachers and increase the number of teachers receiving professional development How teachers, parents, etc. have collaborated to develop the local plan
LEA Uses of  Title II Funds Recruitment and hiring Professional development Certification, Licensure, mentoring Teacher testing Merit pay, differential pay, performance bonuses Accountability efforts
LEA Uses of Title II Funds Districts have expanded flexibility in the use of these funds. They are not required to use funds just on math and science education.  However . . .  Congress fully intended that Title II funds CONTINUE to be used for science education!
LEA Uses of Title II Funds When determining how Title II funds are to be used, based on the needs assessment, keep in mind that ALL teachers, including science teachers, need to be fully qualified by 2005-06. Also, state science assessments begin in 2007.
LEA Uses of Funds CAN THESE FUNDS BE USED FOR NATIONAL AND STATE CONVENTIONS? YES . . . IF attendance at these conventions is part of the teacher’s individual professional development plan
NCLB - Flexibility Districts have flexible use of Title II funds. They can opt to move 50 percent of funds from one or all of four major federal programs (Teacher Quality State Grants, Education Technology, Safe and Drug Free Schools, and Innovative Education Programs) into Title I programs, or into any one of these programs.
NCLB Resources Available to Science Teachers In addition to Title II Part A, science educators should be familiar with these programs in NCLB: Title II, Part B: Math/Science Partnerships Title II Part D: Education Technology Title V, Part A: Innovative Education Programs
Title II, Part B: Math and Science Partnerships M/S Partnerships will receive $12.5 million in FY 2002. Congressional authorizers had requested $450 mil for this program.  If yearly appropriations are above $100 million, $$ goes to the states. Partnerships apply to the State Education Agency for the competitive grants.
Title II Part D  Education Technology Title II Part D (Technology): Combines the Technology Literacy Challenge and Technology Innovation Challenge. ($700 million FY 2002) Formula grant to the state, based on Title I formulas. State uses 5 percent for state activities. 50 percent  goes to LEAS based on Title I formula; 50 percent goes as competitive grants to districts or eligible partners.  25 percent must be used for teacher training in technology.
Title V, Part A Title V, Part A: ($385 million FY 2002) Old Title VI block grants, now the Innovative Education Programs. Formula grants to states based on school aged population. 85 percent allocated to districts based on enrollments. 27 uses of funds, including teacher training and acquisition of materials.
Seven Quick Facts: NCLB The law requires states to develop plans with annual measurable objectives that will ensure that all math and science teachers are “highly qualified” by the end of the 2005-2006 school year.  (Highly qualified means all teachers must be certified or licensed, hold a bachelor’s degree, and have demonstrated competencies in his or her teaching area, as determined by the state.)
Quick Facts: NCLB 2. Over $2.8 billion will be made available to states and school districts nationwide under Title II Part A, during the 2002-2003 school year.  Districts have more funds available for Professional Development in 2002-2003 than the did in 2001-2002
Quick Facts: NCLB 3. While there is no set-aside for math and science in Title II, all of the funding that a district receives for Title II can be used for professional development, including math and science professional development if a district so chooses.
Quick Facts: NCLB 4. In order for a district to continue to receive Title II funding it must conduct an assessment of its professional development and hiring needs. This needs assessment must be carried out with the involvement of teachers.
Quick Facts: NCLB 5. In order for a district to receive Title II funding, it must submit to the state an application which includes a plan to improve teacher quality, based on the results of the needs assessment. Teachers must be involved in the preparation of this plan.  
Quick Facts: NCLB 6. States will be required to test students in math and reading every year in grades 3 through 8. States must set—then meet—rigorous adequate yearly progress marks toward having all students proficient in these areas by the end of the 2013-14 school year. States must administer an annual assessment of student achievement in science at least once in grades 3-5, 6-9, and 10-12, beginning in 2007.
Quick Facts: NCLB 7. Districts have flexible use of Title II funds. They can opt to move 50 percent of funds from one or all of four major federal programs (Teacher Quality State Grants, Education Technology, Safe and Drug Free Schools, and Innovative Education Programs) into Title I programs, or into any one of these programs.
NCLB: For More Information NSTA Website:  www.nsta.org Title II Guidance:  www.ed.gov/offices/OESE/SIP/TitleIIguidance2002.doc EMAIL YOUR QUESTIONS TO: [email_address]  --or–  [email_address]

More Related Content

PPT
Introduction to the No Child Left Behind Policy
PPT
No child left behind ppt.
PPTX
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001
PPT
No Child Left Behind
PDF
K to 12 General Presentation
PPTX
REPUBLICT ACT 8545 By Darren Joy A. Laloon
PPTX
No child left behind
PPT
History of No Child Left Behind Act of 2001
Introduction to the No Child Left Behind Policy
No child left behind ppt.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001
No Child Left Behind
K to 12 General Presentation
REPUBLICT ACT 8545 By Darren Joy A. Laloon
No child left behind
History of No Child Left Behind Act of 2001

What's hot (20)

PPT
Besra report powerpoint
PPTX
Trends, issues and policies in philippine education (1)
PPT
Understanding the k 12 basic education program updated 042312 copy - copy
PPT
Current Legal Issues In Education
PPTX
Standards based curriculum
PPTX
Accreditation of programs.faap
PPTX
Models of curriculum development
PPTX
FISCAL MANAGEMENT
PPTX
Acquisition of school sites
PPTX
Problems and Issues in the Philippine Educational System
PPTX
Report on decentralized planning
PPTX
Educational Reform
PPT
Economics in education1/financing Education
PPTX
Educational legislation
PPTX
Chapter 3: On Becoming A Global Teacher
PPTX
_Political-Factors-Affecting-School-SYSTEM
PPTX
Issues in Outcomes Based Education
PPTX
School Plant Management Educ. 265
PPTX
K 12 Curriculum
PPTX
Problems and Issues in Tertiary Level
Besra report powerpoint
Trends, issues and policies in philippine education (1)
Understanding the k 12 basic education program updated 042312 copy - copy
Current Legal Issues In Education
Standards based curriculum
Accreditation of programs.faap
Models of curriculum development
FISCAL MANAGEMENT
Acquisition of school sites
Problems and Issues in the Philippine Educational System
Report on decentralized planning
Educational Reform
Economics in education1/financing Education
Educational legislation
Chapter 3: On Becoming A Global Teacher
_Political-Factors-Affecting-School-SYSTEM
Issues in Outcomes Based Education
School Plant Management Educ. 265
K 12 Curriculum
Problems and Issues in Tertiary Level
Ad

Viewers also liked (20)

PPT
No Child Left Behind
PPT
W 200-- No Child Left Behind
PPTX
No child left behind 2013 presentation PAA 601
PPT
No Child Left Behind1
PDF
Education Policy- No Child Left Behind and the Every Student Succeeds Act
PPTX
Using Data for Continuos School Improvement
PPTX
A DYNAMIC APPROACH TO SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT: MAIN FEATURES AND IMPACT ON STUDEN...
PPTX
Pros and cons of nclb
PDF
James Martin School Improvement Plan
PPT
Education Policy
PDF
Time table term 3 19th jan.17
PDF
Sc ip 2016 17 final
PDF
Other health impairment
PPTX
Behavior
PPT
Understanding Behavior
PPTX
Universal Design for Learning (UDL) overview
PPTX
PPT
Other Health Impairment #2
PPT
SCHOOL-WIDE POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT
PPTX
Education in the Philippines
No Child Left Behind
W 200-- No Child Left Behind
No child left behind 2013 presentation PAA 601
No Child Left Behind1
Education Policy- No Child Left Behind and the Every Student Succeeds Act
Using Data for Continuos School Improvement
A DYNAMIC APPROACH TO SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT: MAIN FEATURES AND IMPACT ON STUDEN...
Pros and cons of nclb
James Martin School Improvement Plan
Education Policy
Time table term 3 19th jan.17
Sc ip 2016 17 final
Other health impairment
Behavior
Understanding Behavior
Universal Design for Learning (UDL) overview
Other Health Impairment #2
SCHOOL-WIDE POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT
Education in the Philippines
Ad

Similar to No Child Left Behind Powerpoint (20)

PDF
Summer learning program policy
PDF
Summer school guidance presentation
PDF
TESOL Policy Outlook - Nov 2016
PDF
Budget presentation
PDF
PSF Budget Analysis 2021-23
PDF
Round 3 budget priorities
PPTX
California State_Levinar
PDF
DPI Summer school guidance
PPTX
Schoolwide Planning LinkedIn
PDF
DepEd-Programs-and-Projects-Profile_2020.pdf
DOCX
No child left behind
PDF
North Carolina budget analysis from NC Justice Center
PDF
Teacher draft recommendations June
PDF
Short session priorities
PPTX
Successful SES application
PPTX
The Gifted Child: Florida Statues in Action
PPT
Certification process july 08
PDF
Cooper Ed budget
PDF
McGill LCAP
PDF
Pat Ashley NC Turnaround Efforts
Summer learning program policy
Summer school guidance presentation
TESOL Policy Outlook - Nov 2016
Budget presentation
PSF Budget Analysis 2021-23
Round 3 budget priorities
California State_Levinar
DPI Summer school guidance
Schoolwide Planning LinkedIn
DepEd-Programs-and-Projects-Profile_2020.pdf
No child left behind
North Carolina budget analysis from NC Justice Center
Teacher draft recommendations June
Short session priorities
Successful SES application
The Gifted Child: Florida Statues in Action
Certification process july 08
Cooper Ed budget
McGill LCAP
Pat Ashley NC Turnaround Efforts

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
Cell Structure & Organelles in detailed.
PDF
The Lost Whites of Pakistan by Jahanzaib Mughal.pdf
PDF
Black Hat USA 2025 - Micro ICS Summit - ICS/OT Threat Landscape
PDF
ChatGPT for Dummies - Pam Baker Ccesa007.pdf
PPTX
UNIT III MENTAL HEALTH NURSING ASSESSMENT
PPTX
Cell Types and Its function , kingdom of life
PDF
Complications of Minimal Access Surgery at WLH
PDF
Module 4: Burden of Disease Tutorial Slides S2 2025
PDF
Chinmaya Tiranga quiz Grand Finale.pdf
PPTX
History, Philosophy and sociology of education (1).pptx
PDF
Weekly quiz Compilation Jan -July 25.pdf
PDF
Supply Chain Operations Speaking Notes -ICLT Program
PDF
grade 11-chemistry_fetena_net_5883.pdf teacher guide for all student
PDF
Updated Idioms and Phrasal Verbs in English subject
PDF
What if we spent less time fighting change, and more time building what’s rig...
PPTX
Radiologic_Anatomy_of_the_Brachial_plexus [final].pptx
PPTX
master seminar digital applications in india
PDF
Paper A Mock Exam 9_ Attempt review.pdf.
PPTX
Lesson notes of climatology university.
PDF
2.FourierTransform-ShortQuestionswithAnswers.pdf
Cell Structure & Organelles in detailed.
The Lost Whites of Pakistan by Jahanzaib Mughal.pdf
Black Hat USA 2025 - Micro ICS Summit - ICS/OT Threat Landscape
ChatGPT for Dummies - Pam Baker Ccesa007.pdf
UNIT III MENTAL HEALTH NURSING ASSESSMENT
Cell Types and Its function , kingdom of life
Complications of Minimal Access Surgery at WLH
Module 4: Burden of Disease Tutorial Slides S2 2025
Chinmaya Tiranga quiz Grand Finale.pdf
History, Philosophy and sociology of education (1).pptx
Weekly quiz Compilation Jan -July 25.pdf
Supply Chain Operations Speaking Notes -ICLT Program
grade 11-chemistry_fetena_net_5883.pdf teacher guide for all student
Updated Idioms and Phrasal Verbs in English subject
What if we spent less time fighting change, and more time building what’s rig...
Radiologic_Anatomy_of_the_Brachial_plexus [final].pptx
master seminar digital applications in india
Paper A Mock Exam 9_ Attempt review.pdf.
Lesson notes of climatology university.
2.FourierTransform-ShortQuestionswithAnswers.pdf

No Child Left Behind Powerpoint

  • 1. No Child Left Behind Act: What’s in the New Education Reform Law
  • 2. No Child Left Behind There are three key hallmarks of the new bill: 1. Testing 2. Accountability 3. Flexibility
  • 3. No Child Left Behind Under the new law, all states must now hold students and districts accountable for student proficiency gains by subgroups in math, reading, and eventually, science.
  • 4. NCLB: Testing and Accountability States must ensure all students are tested annually in reading and math by the 2005-06 school year. By 2007, all states must administer an annual assessment in science in at least one grade level: 3-5, 6-9, and 10-12.
  • 5. NCLB: Testing and Accountability States must set--then meet—adequate yearly progress (AYP) targets toward the goal of having all children meet proficiency levels in core subjects by the 2013-14 school year. Schools that fail to meet AYP face sanctions, including providing supplemental services, transportation to other schools, and restructuring.
  • 6. NCLB: Highly Qualified Teachers By the end of 2005-06 school year, the law requires all states ensure that every classroom teacher is “highly qualified”. To meet this definition, teachers must be certified or licensed; hold a bachelor’s degree; and have demonstrated competencies in his or her teaching area, to be determined by the state.
  • 7. NCLB: Highly Qualified Teachers To meet the law’s requirement, States (and districts) must develop a measurable plan to increase the number of all core subject teachers who are highly qualified. This plan must include an increase in the number of teachers who are participating in high quality professional development.
  • 8. NCLB: Teacher Quality Accountability Based on this plan, after 2 years without meeting annual goals/steps the state has determined to increase the number of highly qualified teachers, the district must develop a strict improvement plan and the SEA must provide assistance. After 3 years, SEA steps in to provide professional development.
  • 9. NCLB: Title II Part A Teacher Quality Grants To help districts and states ensure that every teacher is “highly qualified,” Congress created Title II Part A funds. Over $2.8 billion has been made available to states and school districts nationwide under Title II Part A, during the 2002-2003 school year.
  • 10. NCLB: Title II Part A $2.85 Billion by Formula to States (35 percent based on school age population, 65 based on low income schools) 1% goes to State Administration, then 2.5% goes for State Agency for Higher Ed Partnership Grants, and 2.5% go for State Programs, then 95% reserved for subgrants to districts
  • 11. NCLB: Title II, Part A State Agency for Higher Ed Partnerships Similar to Eisenhower Higher Education Grant Program – NO M/S set-aside FY 2002 approximately $70 million FY 2001 (Eisenhower SAHE State Grants) approximately $70 million
  • 12. NCLB: Title II, Part A State Level Programs (Funding can be used for professional development) FY 2002 approximately $70 million FY 2001 (Eisenhower State-Level Programs) approximately $12 million
  • 13. NCLB: For LEAs To Receive Title II , Part A Funds 95 percent of Title II funds are reserved as subgrants for districts. Districts must apply to the state education agency for Title II funds. First, the district must conduct a NEEDS ASSESSMENT of the teaching force. (Applications for FY2002 are already in – new guidance may require needs assessments for FY2003 or future applications.) *Teachers must be involved in the needs assessment!
  • 14. NCLB: For LEAs To Receive Title II, Part A Funds Using the results of the needs assessment, districts must develop a LOCAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN which will determine the activities the district will undertake to ensure ALL teachers are highly qualified. This plan must be included in the application to the state for Title II funds. (Applications for FY2003 funds) *Teachers must be involved in the Local Improvement Plan!
  • 15. Local Improvement Plan Must Include: The results of the needs assessment Activities the district will carry out with funds, including professional development How the activities are based on scientifically based research and why they are expected to increase student achievement
  • 16. Part A Local Improvement Plan Must Include: How district will ensure the professional development needs of teachers will be met How the district will use the funds to increase the percentage of highly qualified teachers and increase the number of teachers receiving professional development How teachers, parents, etc. have collaborated to develop the local plan
  • 17. LEA Uses of Title II Funds Recruitment and hiring Professional development Certification, Licensure, mentoring Teacher testing Merit pay, differential pay, performance bonuses Accountability efforts
  • 18. LEA Uses of Title II Funds Districts have expanded flexibility in the use of these funds. They are not required to use funds just on math and science education. However . . . Congress fully intended that Title II funds CONTINUE to be used for science education!
  • 19. LEA Uses of Title II Funds When determining how Title II funds are to be used, based on the needs assessment, keep in mind that ALL teachers, including science teachers, need to be fully qualified by 2005-06. Also, state science assessments begin in 2007.
  • 20. LEA Uses of Funds CAN THESE FUNDS BE USED FOR NATIONAL AND STATE CONVENTIONS? YES . . . IF attendance at these conventions is part of the teacher’s individual professional development plan
  • 21. NCLB - Flexibility Districts have flexible use of Title II funds. They can opt to move 50 percent of funds from one or all of four major federal programs (Teacher Quality State Grants, Education Technology, Safe and Drug Free Schools, and Innovative Education Programs) into Title I programs, or into any one of these programs.
  • 22. NCLB Resources Available to Science Teachers In addition to Title II Part A, science educators should be familiar with these programs in NCLB: Title II, Part B: Math/Science Partnerships Title II Part D: Education Technology Title V, Part A: Innovative Education Programs
  • 23. Title II, Part B: Math and Science Partnerships M/S Partnerships will receive $12.5 million in FY 2002. Congressional authorizers had requested $450 mil for this program. If yearly appropriations are above $100 million, $$ goes to the states. Partnerships apply to the State Education Agency for the competitive grants.
  • 24. Title II Part D Education Technology Title II Part D (Technology): Combines the Technology Literacy Challenge and Technology Innovation Challenge. ($700 million FY 2002) Formula grant to the state, based on Title I formulas. State uses 5 percent for state activities. 50 percent goes to LEAS based on Title I formula; 50 percent goes as competitive grants to districts or eligible partners. 25 percent must be used for teacher training in technology.
  • 25. Title V, Part A Title V, Part A: ($385 million FY 2002) Old Title VI block grants, now the Innovative Education Programs. Formula grants to states based on school aged population. 85 percent allocated to districts based on enrollments. 27 uses of funds, including teacher training and acquisition of materials.
  • 26. Seven Quick Facts: NCLB The law requires states to develop plans with annual measurable objectives that will ensure that all math and science teachers are “highly qualified” by the end of the 2005-2006 school year.  (Highly qualified means all teachers must be certified or licensed, hold a bachelor’s degree, and have demonstrated competencies in his or her teaching area, as determined by the state.)
  • 27. Quick Facts: NCLB 2. Over $2.8 billion will be made available to states and school districts nationwide under Title II Part A, during the 2002-2003 school year. Districts have more funds available for Professional Development in 2002-2003 than the did in 2001-2002
  • 28. Quick Facts: NCLB 3. While there is no set-aside for math and science in Title II, all of the funding that a district receives for Title II can be used for professional development, including math and science professional development if a district so chooses.
  • 29. Quick Facts: NCLB 4. In order for a district to continue to receive Title II funding it must conduct an assessment of its professional development and hiring needs. This needs assessment must be carried out with the involvement of teachers.
  • 30. Quick Facts: NCLB 5. In order for a district to receive Title II funding, it must submit to the state an application which includes a plan to improve teacher quality, based on the results of the needs assessment. Teachers must be involved in the preparation of this plan.  
  • 31. Quick Facts: NCLB 6. States will be required to test students in math and reading every year in grades 3 through 8. States must set—then meet—rigorous adequate yearly progress marks toward having all students proficient in these areas by the end of the 2013-14 school year. States must administer an annual assessment of student achievement in science at least once in grades 3-5, 6-9, and 10-12, beginning in 2007.
  • 32. Quick Facts: NCLB 7. Districts have flexible use of Title II funds. They can opt to move 50 percent of funds from one or all of four major federal programs (Teacher Quality State Grants, Education Technology, Safe and Drug Free Schools, and Innovative Education Programs) into Title I programs, or into any one of these programs.
  • 33. NCLB: For More Information NSTA Website: www.nsta.org Title II Guidance: www.ed.gov/offices/OESE/SIP/TitleIIguidance2002.doc EMAIL YOUR QUESTIONS TO: [email_address] --or– [email_address]