System Architectures Using OIF CEI-56G Interfaces
Nathan Tracy
Technologist, TE Connectivity
Technical Committee Chair, OIF
Agenda
OIF History of Common Electrical Interface (CEI)
Identification of CEI-56Gb/s Requirements
Typical Architectures for 56Gb/s Applications
56Gb/s Technology and Architecture Considerations
Channel Improvements to Enable Architectures
Summary
1
2
Notice: This contribution has been created to assist the Optical Internetworking Forum (OIF). This document is offered to the
OIF solely as a basis for discussion and is not a binding proposal on the companies listed as resources above. Each
company in the source list, and the OIF, reserves the rights to at any time to add, amend, or withdraw statements contained
herein.
This Working Text represents work in progress by the OIF, and must not be construed as an official OIF Technical Report.
Nothing in this document is in any way binding on the OIF or any of its members. The document is offered as a basis for
discussion and communication, both within and without the OIF.
For additional information contact:
The Optical Internetworking Forum, 48377 Fremont Blvd,
Suite 117, Fremont, CA 94538
510-492-4040 phone info@oiforum.com
© 2015 Optical Internetworking Forum
3
OIF Common Electrical Interface (CEI)
Electrical Implementation Agreements
 CEI IA (Common Electrical Interface) is a clause-based format
supporting publication of new clauses over time:
 CEI-1.0: included CEI-6G-SR, CEI-6G-LR, and CEI-11G-SR clauses.
 CEI-2.0: added CEI-11G-LR clause
 CEI-3.0: added work from CEI-25G-LR, CEI-28G-SR
 CEI-3.1: includes CEI-28G-MR and CEI-28G-VSR
 CEI-11G and -28G specifications have been used as a basis
for specifications developed in IEEE 802.3, ANSI/INCITS T11,
and IBTA.
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
SxI-5 CEI-1.0 CEI-2.0 CEI-3.0
3G
6G
11G 25G & 28G
56G
CEI-3.1
4
CEI-25G Application Space
Chip-to-Chip (300 mm)
Chip-to-Optics
Chip Chip
Chip Optics
CEI-28G-VSR
Published in CEI 3.0:
LR: Backplane, passive
copper cable.
SR: Chip-to-chip, and
chip-to-module.
Published in CEI 3.1:
MR: Chip-to-chip, and
low loss backplane.
VSR: Chip-to-module
(fully retimed optics)
Optics Chip
Low loss Backplane (500 mm)
Chip Chip
CEI-28G-MR
Backplane (700 mm) or
Passive Copper Cable
Chip Chip
CEI-25G-LRCEI-28G-SR
5
CEI Application Space is Evolving
 The “OIF Next Generation Interconnect Framework” white
paper lays out a roadmap for CEI-56G serial links.
 2.5D and 3D applications are becoming increasingly relevant.
 High function ASICs (such as switch chips) are driving
requirements for higher I/O density and lower interface power.
 Emerging trends
 Pin density is not increasing
fast enough for high density
ASICs.
 Power reduction of 30%
from one generation to
next is not good enough.
6
CEI-56G Application Spaces
Chip-to-Chip & Midplane
Chip-to-Module
Chip Pluggable
Optics
CEI-56G-USR
 USR: 2.5D/3D applications
 1 cm, no connectors, no
packages
 XSR: Chip to nearby optics
engine
 5 cm, no connectors
 5-10 dB loss @28 GHz
 VSR: Chip-to-module
 10 cm, 1 connector
 10-20 dB loss @28 GHz
 MR: Interfaces for chip to chip
and midrange backplane
 50 cm, 1 connector
 15-25 dB loss @14 GHz
 20-50 dB loss @28 GHz
 LR: Interface for chip to chip
over a backplane
 100cm, 2 connectors
 35dB at 14Ghz
Chip Chip
Backplane or Passive Copper Cable
Chip Chip
3D Stack
CEI-56G-XSR
CEI-56G-VSR
2.5D Chip-to-OE
Optics Chip
Chip to Nearby OE
CEI-56G-MR
CEI-56G-LR
Ultra short reach
Extra short reach
Very short reach
Medium reach
Long reach
7
Optical Line Card Evolution
Today’s 100G based optical system based on 28G
electrical interconnects
These 100G systems could eventually increase
density by migrating to 2x50G optical modules
leveraging the OIF’s 56G-VSR specification
Line Card CFP4/QSFP28 100G
Module
Tx/Rx
Optics
RetimerRetimer
BackplaneSwitch Card
Retimer
ASICASIC
4x 25GNx 25GNx 25G
Nx
25G
(CEI-25G-LR,
100GBASE-KR4)
(CEI-28G-
SR/MR,
CAUI-4 c2c)
(CEI-28G-VSR,
CAUI-4 c2m)
(CEI-28G-
SR/MR)
4x
25G
10-12 dB chip-to-module
interface
35dB 100GBASE-KR4
backplane interface
15-20 dB
chip-to-chip interface
Source: Semtech
8
200G/400G Optical Line Card
Possible long term 4x/8x 50G optical system
56G-VSR enables higher density 200G/400G optical line
card
Note that 56G PAM4 max interconnect losses reflect
those of 28G NRZ allowing for similar component
placement to today’s 100G line card!
Line Card
400G Module
Tx/Rx
Optics
Retimer
Retimer
BackplaneSwitch Card
Retimer
ASICASIC
8x 56G
Nx 56GNx 56G
Nx
56G
(CEI-56G-LR-PAM4) (CEI-56G-
MR-PAM4,
CDAUI-8 c2c)
(CEI-56G-VSR-PAM4,
CDAUI-8 c2m)
8x 56G
10dB PAM4
chip-to-module interface
35dB PAM4
backplane interface
15-20 dB PAM4
chip-to-chip interface
(CEI-56G-
MR-PAM4,
CDAUI-8 c2c)
200G Module
Tx/Rx
Optics
Retimer
4x 56G
4x 56G
Source: Semtech
Note: PAM4
examples
shown, could
also be NRZ
9
56G PAM-4 IC Technology Selection
CMOS/SiGe implementation tradeoffs
CMOS suitable for Line Card SerDes
Potentially SiGe or CMOS for Module Retimer depending
upon IC functionality & complexity
Factor CMOS SiGe BiCMOS Notes
Analog
Performance
Favors SiGe
SiGe analog performance
typically better (jitter, NF,
etc)
Digital
Complexity
Favors CMOS
Functions such as FEC
challenging in SiGe
Cost Favors SiGe
NRZ likely to require more
complex equalization
Equalization
Options
Analog
ADC/DSP
Analog
PAM-4 lends itself to
DAC/ADC approach
though analog
approaches still feasible
pJ/bit
efficiency
Expect comparable
transceiver efficiencies
Source: Semtech
Cable Backplane Demo
50G NRZ Eval
Board (Tx)
Cable Backplane
• 46” total channel length
• 40” copper backplane (30
gauge)
• Two STRADA Whisper connectors
• Two break out cards (5” & 1”)
50G NRZ Eval
Board (Rx)
Cables Cables
Insertion Loss ~ 23dB at 25Ghz
Insertion Loss ~ 1.5dB at 25Ghz Insertion Loss ~ 1.5dB at 25Ghz
BER ~ 1e-12
50G NRZ Progress
Test board
Source: Credo
10
Transitioning from 25Gb/s to 56Gb/s
Same number of IO
Core logic complexity scales to 4X
• 28nm to 16nm process node
But LR Serdes may hardly scale
• Limitations in die area and power density
USR and XSR may enable higher density
architectures by providing a low power
interface
Ability to escape to a SerDes which can
support multiple applications (VSR, MR,
LR)
11
45mm
45mm
27mm
27m
m
Core
Logic
16nm
Serdes Serdes
Serdes Serdes
Serdes
Serdes
Serdes
Serdes
Package Ball View
Next Generation Switch Chip
- Doubling the capacity
Source: Alcatel Lucent
System OEM Perspective on 56Gb/s
• Product flexibility – must drive worst case Channel I/O will
see
• VSR turns into MR or even LR(Lite) -> PAM4
• Transistor BW/Nyquist Rate ratio varies greatly between
process technologies; 50GHZ power/performance is effected
by process (CMOS, SiGe, etc.)
• Can’t just look at channel characteristics, must be IC/Channel
optimized
• No errors after FEC (in large systems even 10^-18 BER have
>1error/hr.; unacceptable)
• Need Low BER before FEC
• Broadband effects (transient behavior vs. pure steady state)
• Eliminate as many broadband effects as possible
• Broadband effects stress adaptation and reduce FEC
efficiency.
Source: Juniper Networks
12
ASIC used in various systems System MR Channel
System Channels
Suck out rules out
56G NRZ
Source: Juniper Networks13
Orthogonal Backplane
Traditional Backplane
*
Backplane Trace
Full Power Serdes on IC
capable of 35 dB channel Loss
without need for retimers
STRADA
Whisper
daughtercardTrace
daughtercardTrace
IC
STRADA
Whisper
Traditional Backplane and Orthogonal
LR SERDES
POWER
LR SERDES
POWER
Backplane Trace
IC
Source: TE Connectivity
Power
56 Gbps 
Reach 
(PAM4)
Traditional PCB & STRADA 
Whisper Connector
100%
(LR Serdes)
1m
14
Cabled Backplane Shuffle
Cabled Backplane
*
Full Power Serdes on Retimer
capable of 35 dB channel
STRADA
Whisper
Cable
daughtercardTrace
daughtercardTrace
IC
STRADA
Whisper
Cable
Cable Backplanes:
Margin/Thermal/Reach
LR/SR SERDES
POWER
LR/SR SERDES
POWER
IC
Source: TE Connectivity
Power
56 Gbps
Reach 
(PAM4)
Traditional PCB & STRADA 
Whisper Connector
100%
(LR Serdes)
1m
STRADA Whisper
Cable Backplane Connector
100%
(LR Serdes)
3m
Traditional PCB & STRADA 
Whisper Connector With Retimers
150%
(VSR + AEC)
1.5m
15
Insertion Loss
DAUGHTER CARD
• Board Material = Megtron6 VLP
• Trace length = 5”
• Trace geometry = Stripline
• Trace width = 6 mils
• Differential trace spacing = 9 mils
• PCB thickness = 110mils, 14 layers
• Counterbored vias, 1 – 6mil stub
• Test Points = 2.4mm (included in data)
PCB BACKPLANE
• Board Material = Megtron6 HVLP
• Trace length = 30”
• Trace geometry = Stripline
• Trace width = 6 mils
• Differential trace spacing = 9 mils
• PCB thickness = 200 mils, 20 layers
• Counterbored vias, 1 – 6mil stub
• STRADA Whisper Vertical Header and
Right Angled Receptacle
CABLED BACKPLANE
• TE-Madison TurboTwin 40G Cable
• 30AWG, 1 meter [39.37”]
• STRADA Whisper Cabled Header and
Right Angled Receptacle
5 10 15 20 25 30 350 40
-80
-60
-40
-20
-100
0
freq, GHz
16.9dB
@12.89GHz
30dB
@12.89GHz
Source: TE Connectivity
16
Mid Board Optics Switch
Optical Backplane System
½ Power Serdes + E/O + O/E Optical Power.
100M Reach including 2 Optical connectors
Optical BackplaneMBO MBOMXCMXC
Optical Backplanes:
Density/Reach Extension
Source: TE Connectivity
Power
56 Gbps
Reach 
(PAM4)
Traditional PCB & STRADA 
Whisper Connector
100%
(LR Serdes)
1m
STRADA Whisper
Cable Backplane Connector
100%
(LR Serdes)
3m
Traditional PCB & STRADA 
Whisper Connector With 
Retimers
150%
(VSR + AEC)
1.5m
VCSEL Optical Backplane
150%
(VSR + Optics)
100m
17
Mid Board Optics for I/O
18
Source: TE Connectivity
Power 
56 Gbps
Reach 
(PAM4)
Traditional PCB w/ Direct Attach 
Passive Cable
100% 
Reference
3m
Traditional PCB w/ Pluggable 
VCSEL Optics
150% 100m
Traditional PCB w/ Power 
Retimers and Dirct Attach 
Passive Cable
150% 5m
Mid Board VCSEL Optics 150% 100m
19
Summary
56G systems require a balancing of requirements:
• connector/channel demands
• semiconductor demands
• equipment demands
New processing techniques can enable new
architectures
Higher performance channels can enable new
architectures
Integrated optics can enable new architectures
High performance systems based on 56Gb/s signaling
rates are being enabled by the OIF‘s CEI-56G projects
Come join the OIF!
www.oiforum.com

More Related Content

PDF
CEI-56G - Signal Integrity to the Forefront
PDF
ENRZ Advanced Modulation for Low Latency Applications
PDF
OIF 112G Panel at DesignCon 2017
PPT
ECOC Panel on OIF CEI 56G
PDF
OIF CEI 56-G-FOE-April2015
PDF
CEI-56G - Testing Considerations
PPT
Fujitsu Iccad Presentation--Enable 100G
PDF
Signal Integrity to the forefront
CEI-56G - Signal Integrity to the Forefront
ENRZ Advanced Modulation for Low Latency Applications
OIF 112G Panel at DesignCon 2017
ECOC Panel on OIF CEI 56G
OIF CEI 56-G-FOE-April2015
CEI-56G - Testing Considerations
Fujitsu Iccad Presentation--Enable 100G
Signal Integrity to the forefront

What's hot (20)

PPTX
Optics for 100G and beyond
PPTX
Transport SDN: From Wish to Reality - OIF at ECOC 2015
PDF
Next-Generation Ethernet: From 100 Gbps to 400 Gbps and Beyond-PowerPoint Sl...
PDF
Fujitsu 100G Overview
PDF
Fiber Technology Trends for Next Generation Networks
PPTX
GMPLS, SDN, Optical Networking and Control Planes
PDF
Beyond 100GE
PDF
Gigalight Solutions for 5G Optical Network
PDF
A 45Gb/s PAM-4 Transmitter Delivering 1.3Vppd Output Swing with 1V supply in ...
PPTX
Time and Phase Delivery
PDF
Scaling Datacenter Bandwidth with 400G and 800G Ethernet by YJ Huang
PDF
Cisco Live! :: Cisco ASR 9000 Architecture :: BRKARC-2003 | Las Vegas 2017
PDF
An Optics Life
PDF
Gigalight Solutions for Data Center and Cloud Computing
PDF
Metro High-Speed Product Line Manager
PDF
Synchronization protection & redundancy in ng networks itsf 2015
PDF
Cascaded ROADM Tolerance of mQAM Optical Signals Employing Nyquist Shaping
PDF
CPqD at Optical Communication Ecosystem - Last/Next 10 years and R&D&I opport...
PDF
Software Defined Network (SDN) using ASR9000 :: BRKSPG-2722 | San Diego 2015
PDF
Performance of Assisted Partial Timing Support (APTS)
Optics for 100G and beyond
Transport SDN: From Wish to Reality - OIF at ECOC 2015
Next-Generation Ethernet: From 100 Gbps to 400 Gbps and Beyond-PowerPoint Sl...
Fujitsu 100G Overview
Fiber Technology Trends for Next Generation Networks
GMPLS, SDN, Optical Networking and Control Planes
Beyond 100GE
Gigalight Solutions for 5G Optical Network
A 45Gb/s PAM-4 Transmitter Delivering 1.3Vppd Output Swing with 1V supply in ...
Time and Phase Delivery
Scaling Datacenter Bandwidth with 400G and 800G Ethernet by YJ Huang
Cisco Live! :: Cisco ASR 9000 Architecture :: BRKARC-2003 | Las Vegas 2017
An Optics Life
Gigalight Solutions for Data Center and Cloud Computing
Metro High-Speed Product Line Manager
Synchronization protection & redundancy in ng networks itsf 2015
Cascaded ROADM Tolerance of mQAM Optical Signals Employing Nyquist Shaping
CPqD at Optical Communication Ecosystem - Last/Next 10 years and R&D&I opport...
Software Defined Network (SDN) using ASR9000 :: BRKSPG-2722 | San Diego 2015
Performance of Assisted Partial Timing Support (APTS)
Ad

Viewers also liked (19)

PDF
Решения Cisco для оптического транспорта
PDF
What's so special about the number 512?
PPTX
Dr. John Bainbridge, Principal Application Architect, NetSpeed
PDF
TCAMのしくみ
PDF
BGP in 2014
DOCX
Cisco catalyst 6500 architecture white paper
PPTX
Prof. Uri Weiser,Technion
PDF
OIF on 400G for Next Gen Optical Networks Conference
PDF
Prof. Danny Raz, Director, Bell Labs Israel, Nokia
PDF
Implementing Useful Clock Skew Using Skew Groups
PDF
05. DF - Latest Trends in Optical Data Center Interconnects
PPTX
Juniper Networks Router Architecture
PDF
End User DNS Measurement at APNIC
PPTX
IT+Summer Edition - Alkossunk élményt - Kolozsi István, kolboid
PPT
урок знам и мога
PPTX
Jongerenparticipatie Sensoa - Inspiratiedag Kansengroepen van Ambrassade op ...
PDF
Doing Terrifying Things - Nati Cohen, Similarweb - DevOpsDays Tel Aviv 2016
PPTX
Plan clases orinson valenciano
PPTX
Kauno miesto savivaldybės 100 dienų ataskaita
Решения Cisco для оптического транспорта
What's so special about the number 512?
Dr. John Bainbridge, Principal Application Architect, NetSpeed
TCAMのしくみ
BGP in 2014
Cisco catalyst 6500 architecture white paper
Prof. Uri Weiser,Technion
OIF on 400G for Next Gen Optical Networks Conference
Prof. Danny Raz, Director, Bell Labs Israel, Nokia
Implementing Useful Clock Skew Using Skew Groups
05. DF - Latest Trends in Optical Data Center Interconnects
Juniper Networks Router Architecture
End User DNS Measurement at APNIC
IT+Summer Edition - Alkossunk élményt - Kolozsi István, kolboid
урок знам и мога
Jongerenparticipatie Sensoa - Inspiratiedag Kansengroepen van Ambrassade op ...
Doing Terrifying Things - Nati Cohen, Similarweb - DevOpsDays Tel Aviv 2016
Plan clases orinson valenciano
Kauno miesto savivaldybės 100 dienų ataskaita
Ad

Similar to OIF 2015 FOE Architecture Presentation (20)

PDF
DesignCon 2019 112-Gbps Electrical Interfaces: An OIF Update on CEI-112G
PDF
OIF CEI-112G at OFC 2020 Presentation
PDF
Trends in next-generation data center interconnects (DCI)
PDF
huawei-s5720-36c-ei-ac-brochure-datasheet.pdf
PDF
huawei-s5720-36c-ei-ac-brochure-datasheet.pdf
PDF
Silicon Photonics and datacenter
PDF
400G/800G High Speed Networking product guide
PDF
huawei-s3700-28tp-si-ac-brochure-datasheet.pdf
PDF
huawei-s5720-36c-ei-28s-ac-brochure-datasheet.pdf
PDF
huawei-s5720-36c-ei-28s-ac-brochure-datasheet.pdf
PDF
huawei-s5720-36c-ei-dc-brochure-datasheet.pdf
PDF
huawei-s5720-36c-ei-dc-brochure-datasheet.pdf
PDF
huawei-s5720-36c-pwr-ei-ac-brochure-datasheet.pdf
PDF
huawei-s5720-36c-pwr-ei-ac-brochure-datasheet.pdf
PDF
huawei-s5700-52p-li-ac-brochure-datasheet.pdf
PDF
cisco-cpak-100ge-lr4=-datasheet.pdf
PDF
huawei-s5700-28c-si-brochure-datasheet.pdf
PDF
cisco-cpak-100g-lr4=-datasheet.pdf
PDF
huawei-s5720-36c-pwr-ei-dc-brochure-datasheet.pdf
PDF
huawei-s5720-36c-pwr-ei-dc-brochure-datasheet.pdf
DesignCon 2019 112-Gbps Electrical Interfaces: An OIF Update on CEI-112G
OIF CEI-112G at OFC 2020 Presentation
Trends in next-generation data center interconnects (DCI)
huawei-s5720-36c-ei-ac-brochure-datasheet.pdf
huawei-s5720-36c-ei-ac-brochure-datasheet.pdf
Silicon Photonics and datacenter
400G/800G High Speed Networking product guide
huawei-s3700-28tp-si-ac-brochure-datasheet.pdf
huawei-s5720-36c-ei-28s-ac-brochure-datasheet.pdf
huawei-s5720-36c-ei-28s-ac-brochure-datasheet.pdf
huawei-s5720-36c-ei-dc-brochure-datasheet.pdf
huawei-s5720-36c-ei-dc-brochure-datasheet.pdf
huawei-s5720-36c-pwr-ei-ac-brochure-datasheet.pdf
huawei-s5720-36c-pwr-ei-ac-brochure-datasheet.pdf
huawei-s5700-52p-li-ac-brochure-datasheet.pdf
cisco-cpak-100ge-lr4=-datasheet.pdf
huawei-s5700-28c-si-brochure-datasheet.pdf
cisco-cpak-100g-lr4=-datasheet.pdf
huawei-s5720-36c-pwr-ei-dc-brochure-datasheet.pdf
huawei-s5720-36c-pwr-ei-dc-brochure-datasheet.pdf

More from Deborah Porchivina (20)

PPTX
"OIF Interop – the Key to Unlocking the Benefits of SDN" at OptiNet China 2017
PDF
OIF SDN Transport API NFV Proof of Concept
PDF
SDN Transport API Interoperability Demo with OIF and ONF
PDF
ONF Transport API (TAPI) Project
PDF
OIF Certification: Optical Control Plane UNI
PDF
OIF Interop: The Key to Unlocking the Benefits of SDN
PDF
OIF Transport SDN Interop - ECOC 2016
PDF
Transport SDN & NFV - What does it mean for Optical Networking?
PPT
The Importance of Rich APIs in Transport SDN
PDF
Virtual Transport Network Service SDN-Based Optical Network Virtualization
PPTX
Enabling Virtual Transport Network Services
PPTX
Transport SDN Interoperability Program with OIF
PPTX
OFC2016 SDN Framework and APIs
DOCX
OIF at OFC 100G Serial Links Workshop
PDF
Enabling Virtual Transport Network Service
PDF
SDN Framework and APIs
PDF
2014 Global Transport SDN Demonstration
PDF
Clearing a Path to Wide-Scale Transport SDN Deployment
PDF
Addressing the Interoperability Question
PDF
Accelerating the Deployment of Practical, Programmable Transport Networks
"OIF Interop – the Key to Unlocking the Benefits of SDN" at OptiNet China 2017
OIF SDN Transport API NFV Proof of Concept
SDN Transport API Interoperability Demo with OIF and ONF
ONF Transport API (TAPI) Project
OIF Certification: Optical Control Plane UNI
OIF Interop: The Key to Unlocking the Benefits of SDN
OIF Transport SDN Interop - ECOC 2016
Transport SDN & NFV - What does it mean for Optical Networking?
The Importance of Rich APIs in Transport SDN
Virtual Transport Network Service SDN-Based Optical Network Virtualization
Enabling Virtual Transport Network Services
Transport SDN Interoperability Program with OIF
OFC2016 SDN Framework and APIs
OIF at OFC 100G Serial Links Workshop
Enabling Virtual Transport Network Service
SDN Framework and APIs
2014 Global Transport SDN Demonstration
Clearing a Path to Wide-Scale Transport SDN Deployment
Addressing the Interoperability Question
Accelerating the Deployment of Practical, Programmable Transport Networks

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
Architecture types and enterprise applications.pdf
PDF
Zenith AI: Advanced Artificial Intelligence
PDF
Improvisation in detection of pomegranate leaf disease using transfer learni...
PDF
ENT215_Completing-a-large-scale-migration-and-modernization-with-AWS.pdf
PDF
CloudStack 4.21: First Look Webinar slides
PDF
Comparative analysis of machine learning models for fake news detection in so...
PDF
Taming the Chaos: How to Turn Unstructured Data into Decisions
PDF
Getting started with AI Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
PDF
sustainability-14-14877-v2.pddhzftheheeeee
PPTX
GROUP4NURSINGINFORMATICSREPORT-2 PRESENTATION
PDF
The influence of sentiment analysis in enhancing early warning system model f...
PDF
sbt 2.0: go big (Scala Days 2025 edition)
PDF
1 - Historical Antecedents, Social Consideration.pdf
PPT
Galois Field Theory of Risk: A Perspective, Protocol, and Mathematical Backgr...
PDF
Enhancing plagiarism detection using data pre-processing and machine learning...
PDF
Convolutional neural network based encoder-decoder for efficient real-time ob...
PDF
Consumable AI The What, Why & How for Small Teams.pdf
PDF
Produktkatalog für HOBO Datenlogger, Wetterstationen, Sensoren, Software und ...
PPTX
AI IN MARKETING- PRESENTED BY ANWAR KABIR 1st June 2025.pptx
PDF
A contest of sentiment analysis: k-nearest neighbor versus neural network
Architecture types and enterprise applications.pdf
Zenith AI: Advanced Artificial Intelligence
Improvisation in detection of pomegranate leaf disease using transfer learni...
ENT215_Completing-a-large-scale-migration-and-modernization-with-AWS.pdf
CloudStack 4.21: First Look Webinar slides
Comparative analysis of machine learning models for fake news detection in so...
Taming the Chaos: How to Turn Unstructured Data into Decisions
Getting started with AI Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
sustainability-14-14877-v2.pddhzftheheeeee
GROUP4NURSINGINFORMATICSREPORT-2 PRESENTATION
The influence of sentiment analysis in enhancing early warning system model f...
sbt 2.0: go big (Scala Days 2025 edition)
1 - Historical Antecedents, Social Consideration.pdf
Galois Field Theory of Risk: A Perspective, Protocol, and Mathematical Backgr...
Enhancing plagiarism detection using data pre-processing and machine learning...
Convolutional neural network based encoder-decoder for efficient real-time ob...
Consumable AI The What, Why & How for Small Teams.pdf
Produktkatalog für HOBO Datenlogger, Wetterstationen, Sensoren, Software und ...
AI IN MARKETING- PRESENTED BY ANWAR KABIR 1st June 2025.pptx
A contest of sentiment analysis: k-nearest neighbor versus neural network

OIF 2015 FOE Architecture Presentation

  • 1. System Architectures Using OIF CEI-56G Interfaces Nathan Tracy Technologist, TE Connectivity Technical Committee Chair, OIF
  • 2. Agenda OIF History of Common Electrical Interface (CEI) Identification of CEI-56Gb/s Requirements Typical Architectures for 56Gb/s Applications 56Gb/s Technology and Architecture Considerations Channel Improvements to Enable Architectures Summary 1
  • 3. 2 Notice: This contribution has been created to assist the Optical Internetworking Forum (OIF). This document is offered to the OIF solely as a basis for discussion and is not a binding proposal on the companies listed as resources above. Each company in the source list, and the OIF, reserves the rights to at any time to add, amend, or withdraw statements contained herein. This Working Text represents work in progress by the OIF, and must not be construed as an official OIF Technical Report. Nothing in this document is in any way binding on the OIF or any of its members. The document is offered as a basis for discussion and communication, both within and without the OIF. For additional information contact: The Optical Internetworking Forum, 48377 Fremont Blvd, Suite 117, Fremont, CA 94538 510-492-4040 phone info@oiforum.com © 2015 Optical Internetworking Forum
  • 4. 3 OIF Common Electrical Interface (CEI) Electrical Implementation Agreements  CEI IA (Common Electrical Interface) is a clause-based format supporting publication of new clauses over time:  CEI-1.0: included CEI-6G-SR, CEI-6G-LR, and CEI-11G-SR clauses.  CEI-2.0: added CEI-11G-LR clause  CEI-3.0: added work from CEI-25G-LR, CEI-28G-SR  CEI-3.1: includes CEI-28G-MR and CEI-28G-VSR  CEI-11G and -28G specifications have been used as a basis for specifications developed in IEEE 802.3, ANSI/INCITS T11, and IBTA. 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 SxI-5 CEI-1.0 CEI-2.0 CEI-3.0 3G 6G 11G 25G & 28G 56G CEI-3.1
  • 5. 4 CEI-25G Application Space Chip-to-Chip (300 mm) Chip-to-Optics Chip Chip Chip Optics CEI-28G-VSR Published in CEI 3.0: LR: Backplane, passive copper cable. SR: Chip-to-chip, and chip-to-module. Published in CEI 3.1: MR: Chip-to-chip, and low loss backplane. VSR: Chip-to-module (fully retimed optics) Optics Chip Low loss Backplane (500 mm) Chip Chip CEI-28G-MR Backplane (700 mm) or Passive Copper Cable Chip Chip CEI-25G-LRCEI-28G-SR
  • 6. 5 CEI Application Space is Evolving  The “OIF Next Generation Interconnect Framework” white paper lays out a roadmap for CEI-56G serial links.  2.5D and 3D applications are becoming increasingly relevant.  High function ASICs (such as switch chips) are driving requirements for higher I/O density and lower interface power.  Emerging trends  Pin density is not increasing fast enough for high density ASICs.  Power reduction of 30% from one generation to next is not good enough.
  • 7. 6 CEI-56G Application Spaces Chip-to-Chip & Midplane Chip-to-Module Chip Pluggable Optics CEI-56G-USR  USR: 2.5D/3D applications  1 cm, no connectors, no packages  XSR: Chip to nearby optics engine  5 cm, no connectors  5-10 dB loss @28 GHz  VSR: Chip-to-module  10 cm, 1 connector  10-20 dB loss @28 GHz  MR: Interfaces for chip to chip and midrange backplane  50 cm, 1 connector  15-25 dB loss @14 GHz  20-50 dB loss @28 GHz  LR: Interface for chip to chip over a backplane  100cm, 2 connectors  35dB at 14Ghz Chip Chip Backplane or Passive Copper Cable Chip Chip 3D Stack CEI-56G-XSR CEI-56G-VSR 2.5D Chip-to-OE Optics Chip Chip to Nearby OE CEI-56G-MR CEI-56G-LR Ultra short reach Extra short reach Very short reach Medium reach Long reach
  • 8. 7 Optical Line Card Evolution Today’s 100G based optical system based on 28G electrical interconnects These 100G systems could eventually increase density by migrating to 2x50G optical modules leveraging the OIF’s 56G-VSR specification Line Card CFP4/QSFP28 100G Module Tx/Rx Optics RetimerRetimer BackplaneSwitch Card Retimer ASICASIC 4x 25GNx 25GNx 25G Nx 25G (CEI-25G-LR, 100GBASE-KR4) (CEI-28G- SR/MR, CAUI-4 c2c) (CEI-28G-VSR, CAUI-4 c2m) (CEI-28G- SR/MR) 4x 25G 10-12 dB chip-to-module interface 35dB 100GBASE-KR4 backplane interface 15-20 dB chip-to-chip interface Source: Semtech
  • 9. 8 200G/400G Optical Line Card Possible long term 4x/8x 50G optical system 56G-VSR enables higher density 200G/400G optical line card Note that 56G PAM4 max interconnect losses reflect those of 28G NRZ allowing for similar component placement to today’s 100G line card! Line Card 400G Module Tx/Rx Optics Retimer Retimer BackplaneSwitch Card Retimer ASICASIC 8x 56G Nx 56GNx 56G Nx 56G (CEI-56G-LR-PAM4) (CEI-56G- MR-PAM4, CDAUI-8 c2c) (CEI-56G-VSR-PAM4, CDAUI-8 c2m) 8x 56G 10dB PAM4 chip-to-module interface 35dB PAM4 backplane interface 15-20 dB PAM4 chip-to-chip interface (CEI-56G- MR-PAM4, CDAUI-8 c2c) 200G Module Tx/Rx Optics Retimer 4x 56G 4x 56G Source: Semtech Note: PAM4 examples shown, could also be NRZ
  • 10. 9 56G PAM-4 IC Technology Selection CMOS/SiGe implementation tradeoffs CMOS suitable for Line Card SerDes Potentially SiGe or CMOS for Module Retimer depending upon IC functionality & complexity Factor CMOS SiGe BiCMOS Notes Analog Performance Favors SiGe SiGe analog performance typically better (jitter, NF, etc) Digital Complexity Favors CMOS Functions such as FEC challenging in SiGe Cost Favors SiGe NRZ likely to require more complex equalization Equalization Options Analog ADC/DSP Analog PAM-4 lends itself to DAC/ADC approach though analog approaches still feasible pJ/bit efficiency Expect comparable transceiver efficiencies Source: Semtech
  • 11. Cable Backplane Demo 50G NRZ Eval Board (Tx) Cable Backplane • 46” total channel length • 40” copper backplane (30 gauge) • Two STRADA Whisper connectors • Two break out cards (5” & 1”) 50G NRZ Eval Board (Rx) Cables Cables Insertion Loss ~ 23dB at 25Ghz Insertion Loss ~ 1.5dB at 25Ghz Insertion Loss ~ 1.5dB at 25Ghz BER ~ 1e-12 50G NRZ Progress Test board Source: Credo 10
  • 12. Transitioning from 25Gb/s to 56Gb/s Same number of IO Core logic complexity scales to 4X • 28nm to 16nm process node But LR Serdes may hardly scale • Limitations in die area and power density USR and XSR may enable higher density architectures by providing a low power interface Ability to escape to a SerDes which can support multiple applications (VSR, MR, LR) 11 45mm 45mm 27mm 27m m Core Logic 16nm Serdes Serdes Serdes Serdes Serdes Serdes Serdes Serdes Package Ball View Next Generation Switch Chip - Doubling the capacity Source: Alcatel Lucent
  • 13. System OEM Perspective on 56Gb/s • Product flexibility – must drive worst case Channel I/O will see • VSR turns into MR or even LR(Lite) -> PAM4 • Transistor BW/Nyquist Rate ratio varies greatly between process technologies; 50GHZ power/performance is effected by process (CMOS, SiGe, etc.) • Can’t just look at channel characteristics, must be IC/Channel optimized • No errors after FEC (in large systems even 10^-18 BER have >1error/hr.; unacceptable) • Need Low BER before FEC • Broadband effects (transient behavior vs. pure steady state) • Eliminate as many broadband effects as possible • Broadband effects stress adaptation and reduce FEC efficiency. Source: Juniper Networks 12
  • 14. ASIC used in various systems System MR Channel System Channels Suck out rules out 56G NRZ Source: Juniper Networks13
  • 15. Orthogonal Backplane Traditional Backplane * Backplane Trace Full Power Serdes on IC capable of 35 dB channel Loss without need for retimers STRADA Whisper daughtercardTrace daughtercardTrace IC STRADA Whisper Traditional Backplane and Orthogonal LR SERDES POWER LR SERDES POWER Backplane Trace IC Source: TE Connectivity Power 56 Gbps  Reach  (PAM4) Traditional PCB & STRADA  Whisper Connector 100% (LR Serdes) 1m 14
  • 16. Cabled Backplane Shuffle Cabled Backplane * Full Power Serdes on Retimer capable of 35 dB channel STRADA Whisper Cable daughtercardTrace daughtercardTrace IC STRADA Whisper Cable Cable Backplanes: Margin/Thermal/Reach LR/SR SERDES POWER LR/SR SERDES POWER IC Source: TE Connectivity Power 56 Gbps Reach  (PAM4) Traditional PCB & STRADA  Whisper Connector 100% (LR Serdes) 1m STRADA Whisper Cable Backplane Connector 100% (LR Serdes) 3m Traditional PCB & STRADA  Whisper Connector With Retimers 150% (VSR + AEC) 1.5m 15
  • 17. Insertion Loss DAUGHTER CARD • Board Material = Megtron6 VLP • Trace length = 5” • Trace geometry = Stripline • Trace width = 6 mils • Differential trace spacing = 9 mils • PCB thickness = 110mils, 14 layers • Counterbored vias, 1 – 6mil stub • Test Points = 2.4mm (included in data) PCB BACKPLANE • Board Material = Megtron6 HVLP • Trace length = 30” • Trace geometry = Stripline • Trace width = 6 mils • Differential trace spacing = 9 mils • PCB thickness = 200 mils, 20 layers • Counterbored vias, 1 – 6mil stub • STRADA Whisper Vertical Header and Right Angled Receptacle CABLED BACKPLANE • TE-Madison TurboTwin 40G Cable • 30AWG, 1 meter [39.37”] • STRADA Whisper Cabled Header and Right Angled Receptacle 5 10 15 20 25 30 350 40 -80 -60 -40 -20 -100 0 freq, GHz 16.9dB @12.89GHz 30dB @12.89GHz Source: TE Connectivity 16
  • 18. Mid Board Optics Switch Optical Backplane System ½ Power Serdes + E/O + O/E Optical Power. 100M Reach including 2 Optical connectors Optical BackplaneMBO MBOMXCMXC Optical Backplanes: Density/Reach Extension Source: TE Connectivity Power 56 Gbps Reach  (PAM4) Traditional PCB & STRADA  Whisper Connector 100% (LR Serdes) 1m STRADA Whisper Cable Backplane Connector 100% (LR Serdes) 3m Traditional PCB & STRADA  Whisper Connector With  Retimers 150% (VSR + AEC) 1.5m VCSEL Optical Backplane 150% (VSR + Optics) 100m 17
  • 19. Mid Board Optics for I/O 18 Source: TE Connectivity Power  56 Gbps Reach  (PAM4) Traditional PCB w/ Direct Attach  Passive Cable 100%  Reference 3m Traditional PCB w/ Pluggable  VCSEL Optics 150% 100m Traditional PCB w/ Power  Retimers and Dirct Attach  Passive Cable 150% 5m Mid Board VCSEL Optics 150% 100m
  • 20. 19 Summary 56G systems require a balancing of requirements: • connector/channel demands • semiconductor demands • equipment demands New processing techniques can enable new architectures Higher performance channels can enable new architectures Integrated optics can enable new architectures High performance systems based on 56Gb/s signaling rates are being enabled by the OIF‘s CEI-56G projects Come join the OIF! www.oiforum.com