OpenAIRE services and tools for researchers/authors and projects (FOSTER workshop at University Jaume I)

Editor's Notes

• #2: I am going to guide you briefly through the main services that the OpenAIRE project offers for projects. This presentation will focus on the tools that will be of importance to you as researchers, research managers, project coordinators, so mainly tools that will make compliance with the OA publications.
• #14: I am going to guide you briefly through the main services that the OpenAIRE project offers for projects. This presentation will focus on the tools that will be of importance to you as ncps, research managers, project coordinators, so mainly tools that will make compliance with the OA publications. I will highligth ten services/tools on how openaire can help research managers, ncps, project coordinator... Researchs that are participating in a H2020 project
• #15: OpenAIRE supports the various Open Access policies in the European Research Area. OpenAIRE offers a variety of resources if you want to know more about the EC’s Open Access Mandate and Open Data Pilot.
• #16: OpenAIRE supports the various Open Access policies in the European Research Area. OpenAIRE offers a variety of resources and support info materials, and if you still have questions – helpdesk.
• #25: STILL HAVE QUESTIONS? Ask our experts
• #26: If you cannot find an answer to your question, please contact us through our helpdesk. STILL HAVE QUESTIONS? Ask our experts
• #31: Approach: deposit once – easy for researchers/research managers – and openaire will offer services.
• #32: If a researcher isn’t sure where to deposit , OPenAIRE can help.
• #33: If a researcher isn’t sure where to deposit , OPenAIRE can help.
• #34: Find also OpenAIRE validated repositories in the list of data providers – almost 700 providers.
• #37: Easy to use, easy to identify the project info in the metadata record.
• #38: This is stated in the AO H2020 mandate, OpenAIRE is helping to make it easy.
• #39: Example: zenodo
• #40: Example: Uminho repositor.
• #42: Alternative: claim a Publications and link it to the project info.
• #45: OpenAIRE portal have a specific page for each funded project!
• #48: You can also incorporate this publication list on your project website (better than adding pdfs)
• #49: A final useful tool resulting from the linking, is the facilitation of project reporting.
• #51: Once the research is deposited, it should be linked to the project information . This happens automatically, but it’s better if you check manually! You can link data, publications and author IDs to each other , thus creating a mini CRIS system. The linking of publications and data to project information is very useful during reporting time. You can do this manually by identifying your project and claim the related research output. Three ways of linked: - automatic: metadata (DC) Automatic/experimental TDM procedures (FP7, wellcome, H2020, FCT) Manual: Claiming Mistakes are possible ! Claiming is not automatically done (there is also a delay).
• #55: Also to be used by participants portal reporting tool  For publications accessible via OpenAIRE, references to these publications (with link to the project ID) are displayed automatically in the reporting section of the Participant Portal for the project. Simply check if the references are directly linked to the work performed within the project. If so, tick these publications as relevant and they will then be included in the table of publications when the report is generated.links and federates existing repositories. As such it provides access to publications that have been deposited in all repositories that are technically interoperable with OpenAIRE ("OpenAIRE compliant") http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/docs/h2020-funding-guide/grants/grant-management/reports/periodic-reports_en.htm
• #59: A final feature from the portal is the statistics and monitoring, on individual and aggregated levels. We welcome special requests !
• #60: Very useful to check OA numbers etc when meeitng with project coordinators
• #66: Question about opting out projects?
• #67: Question about opting out projects?
• #69: “consistently used”: as in many situations this is to a small extent a technical matter: to a larger extent it depends on organising, agreements, and people citing reponsibly. So, if you are in a position to stimulate this, please do so. On top of this, the OpenAIRE project investigates and improves automatic linking, also often via the PID.
• #75: 392 datasets from PANGAEA AND 52 Publications from: Unknown Repository (30)Biogeosciences (BG) (11)Biogeosciences (7)Biogeosciences Disc... (6)OceanRep (6)Ocean Science (OS) (4)Europe PubMed Central (3)Open Repository and... (2)Electronic Publicat... (2)NERC Open Research ... (2)Ocean Science Discu... (1)PLoS ONE (1)Ocean Science (OS) (1)e-Prints Soton (1)University of South... (1)Research@StAndrews:... (1)ArchiMer - Institut... (1)Earth-prints Reposi... (1)Archive ouverte UNIGE (1)Ghent University Ac... (1) 392 datasets
• #76: Concrete examples: Publication: https://www.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=dedup_wf_001::d5a93e225ee49168ddd6bb8c85acd4c6 Dataset: http://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.779512
• #79: Dataset: http://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.808406 Pub.: http://ria.ua.pt/handle/10773/4452
• #82: Second, you can select your organisation, but no problem if it’s not on the list. Note that ou may also find projects here, such as ELIXIR for life sciences.
• #83: You may want to include the guidance provided by the DCC. This is a good addition to the guidance that the EC provides on the questions of the template. Next, click CREATE.
• #84: You’re asked to provide some basic information. Please note that the ID here is one that you enter yourself, for your convenience. I’ll show you in a second where I did this.
• #85: This page summarises that the DMP is a deliverable to be submitted within 6 months into the project. Below the orange bar it lists the topics of the initial DMP.
• #86: You’re asked to provide some basic information. Please note that the ID here is one that you enter yourself, for your convenience and that of your collaborators. In this way the researcher proceeds to write the plan – more details follow in a second, but let’s first look ahead:
• #87: …and select an export format; for the EC PDF is fine.
• #88: The DMP is a deliverable/milestone to be delivered in the first 6 months AFTER the start of the project. The project officer and reviewers will ask for it, will evaluate it and give it a mark like any other deliverable (excellent, good, needs revision, rejected). This usually happens at the first review, unless the Project Officer is quite meticulous. In subsequent reviews (or any time they feel like) the PO and reviewers may check to see if the DMP is followed (e.g., data files deposited, access status, metadata format, ...). 
• #89: And make sure that you know what will be asked of you for the mid-term and the final review: the focus here is on enabling reuse of your data – by your future self and others. In a couple of minutes I’ll tell you why this is a bit underspecified. Okay, this is the easy part: there is a template. What’s really at stake of course is: what to write in the plan, and who should be involved?
• #90: The process of planning is also a process of communication, increasingly important in interdisciplinary / multi-partner research. Collaboration will be more harmonious if project partners (in industry, other universities, other countries…) are in accord. Open Science encourages – and indeed requires – heterogeneous stakeholder groups to work together for a shared societal goal. It’s worth bearing in mind that RDM and DMP are similarly hybrid activities, involving multiple stakeholder types… The principal investigator (usually ultimately responsible for data) Research assistants (may be more involved in day-to-day data management) Ideally, they have a FO in the institute and/or in the domain: Library/IT/Legal/Funding office (The library may issue PIDs, or liaise with an external service who do this, e.g. DataCite. The funding office may have a compliance role) And the FO ideally relies on back-office services, such as long-term archives and high-capacity data transfer. Partners based in other institutions Commercial partners Publishers etc Many of us have a role in the FO or the BO: hand raising!!
• #91: Remember, we are still in the early stage of a project,
• #93: Re Software etc: in many cases copyright will prevent the archiving of software and tools. The alternative is a sensible description. More about this in the break-out session after the lunch break… http://www.veryicon.com/icons/object/package-icons/packageicon-zip.html
• #96: Proper data management won’t prevent theft of your laptop, but will help you to keep your data safe – even if they are not meant to go public.
• #97: Certification as a ‘trustworthy digital repository’, with an explicit ambition to keep the data available in the long term. We know of course that several domains have longstanding archives that are not certified as TRD, because they are unsure how much effort a certification process entails. We think that’s a pity. … three-tiered proces... And the Open Science, Open Access, Open Data effort should really encourage the willing repositories to apply for certification. Matches your particular data needs (e.g. formats accepted; access, back-up and recovery, and sustainability of the service). Most of this information should be contained within the data repository’s policy pages. Gives your submitted dataset a persistent and unique identifier: for sustainable citations – both for data and publications – and to link back to particular researchers and grants. Lands visitors at the dataset or its metadata. Helps to track how the data has been used by providing access and download statistics. Offers clear terms and conditions that meet legal requirements (e.g. for data protection) and allow reuse without unnecessary licensing conditions. Provides guidance on how to cite the data that has been deposited. Elly will tell more about trustworthy repositories and also say a few words about storing data safely DURING the project, because that’s also part of data management.
• #98: mission to provide reliable, long-term access to managed digital resources to its designated community, now and into the future constant monitoring, planning, and maintenance understand threats to and risks within its systems regular cycle of audit and/or certification DIN 31644 / ISO 16363 Council for Science – World Data System (ICSU-WDS). Met deze certificering bevestigt WDS dat DANS betrouwbaar is als het gaat om: authenticiteit, integriteit, vertrouwenswaardigheid en beschikbaarheid van data en datadiensten.
• #99: Use an external data archive or repository already established for your research domain to preserve the data according to recognised standards in your discipline. If available, use an institutional research data repository, or your research group’s established data management facilities. Use a well-known data repository in your own country. Use a cost-free (data) repository such as Zenodo. Search for other data repositories here: re3data.org
• #105: If you dont have an appropriated repository use Zenodo - the catch-all repository hosted by CERN, is linked to OpenIARE and can be used to deposit research publications and data. Zenodo is of course harvested by the openaire portal
• #110: Zenodo is developed by CERN under the EU FP7 project OpenAIREplus