Yes, there is an ethical violation in this situation:
1. The title of the article "Famous actress abused by husband" is misleading and does not accurately reflect what the actress stated in the interview. She only mentioned they had constant arguments, not that she was abused. This violates the principle of honesty.
2. By implying she was abused without evidence, it risks damaging the reputation of the husband. This violates the principle of avoiding harm.
3. The journalist Juan has a responsibility to report facts accurately instead of sensationalizing for clicks/views. This violates the principle of truthfulness.
In summary, the misleading title without basis violates communication ethics principles of honesty, avoiding harm, and truthful reporting of facts