Peer reviewexercise#5
- 1. 1. What is the primary idea of the content in the articles? Isaiah David and an eHow Contributing Writer wrote Car Navigation System. Isaiah David wrote How to Use a Map-Based GPS Car Navigation System. First, he worte that relation of Car Navigation System and GPS satellites. Next, he worte information of GPS satellites. Next, he worte information that how to caluculate location. Finally, he worte information of function of Car Navigation System. An eHow Contributing Writer wrote How to Use a Map-Based GPS Car Navigation System. Writer worte that how to use Car Navigation System. 2. Do you think the individual sections and headings in the document (articles) clearly represent the idea that was communicated. Explain the reasons behind your comments. I think that the individual sections and headings in the document clearly represent the idea that was communicated because I think three reasons. First, sentences of Isaiah David are good for me to read because his headings intend to content of sentences. Second, he use easy words,it is good for me to understand those sentences. Third, sentences of an eHow Contributing Writer are simple. It is good for me to read those sentences. For the above, I think that the individual sections and headings in the document clearly represent the idea that was communicated. 3. What details are included in the articles? Isaiah David and an eHow Contributing Writer wrote Car Navigation System. Isaiah David wrote How to Use a Map-Based GPS Car Navigation System. First, he worte that relation of Car Navigation System and GPS satellites. Next, he worte information of GPS satellites. Next, he worte information that how to caluculate location. Finally, he worte information of function of Car Navigation System. An eHow Contributing Writer wrote How to Use a Map-Based GPS Car Navigation System. Writer worte that how to use Car Navigation System. 4. Was there anything that was confusing? If so, what is it? I was not confusing that to read those sentences because this document is very easy for me to read. Isaiah David use easy words,it is good for me to understand those sentences. sentences of him are good for me to read because his headings intend to content of sentences. sentences of an eHow Contributing Writer are simple. It is good for me to read those sentences. For the above, I was not confusing that to read those sentences. 5. What is good about the writing? Why is it good? I wrote even the above, I think that good points of two writers are following. Isaiah David use easy words in those sentences,it is good for me to understand those sentences. sentences of him are good for me to read and understand those sentences because his headings intend to content of sentences. sentences of an eHow Contributing Writer are simple. It is good for me to read those sentences. For above points, I felt good writing for two writers. 6. Are there any errors that need to be corrected?
- 2. For the feeling that I read, I think that there was not the mistake of the word and grammatically. I think that it is good for me to read sentences of Isaiah David and an eHow Contributing Writer because words that were used those sentences is easy for me to read and understand this sentences. Sentences of Isaiah David are good for me to read because his headings intend to content of sentences. For above, I think that there was not the mistake. 7. What specific suggestions for improving the articles can you make? I think that I can improve sentences of An eHow Contributing Writer. I think sentences of An eHow Contributing Writer are good to write documents. But, sentences of an eHow Contributing Writer were not written headings. I think that it is bad to understand those sentences. I think that if sentences are written headings, it is good for viewer to read and understand. Above reason, I think that I improve sentences of An eHow Contributing Writer. 8. Identify three basic differences between how your group would author a similar document and how this author authored it (as you see it in the link). First,the sentences of two writer are very easy to understand because those sentences are clear. I think that the document that was written by our group is not easy to understand. Second, two writer used correct grammar in those sentences. I think that document that were maked by our group are not used correct grammar. Third, sentences of Isaiah David was written correct headings. It is very good for me to read and understand those sentences. I think that our group can not write correct headings.