SlideShare a Scribd company logo
MERT YİĞİT
EDA ACAR    MERVE KILIÇ
 Founded in 1986 and located in Torbalı İzmir
 Produces plastic materials ; flush tanks, internal
  mechanisms, toilet seats etc…
 Eighteen injection machines
 Five assembly lines
Performance Evaluation and System Design with Simulation Modeling
Work steps
 Modelling current system


 Facility layout optimization and design


 Response surface methodology
System is simulated over two product as realistic as
possible by using Arena software

Feasible layout design is obtained by using Flap

Optimum number of forklift and transpalet are
determined by using RSM
Before modelling
   Work flow
   Bill of material
   Operation trees
   Time studies
   Input analysis
   Cycle times
   Break downs
   Defect rates
   Size of the boxes and cages
Defect rates calculations;
Defect Rates of Machines
Breakdowns of machine 8
Machine breakdowns
Product tree
Time study of Hero Gömme Rezervuar
Input analysis
Components are carried ;
 boxes or cages
 228 cages and
 1000 blue boxes
 Capacity of this boxes and cages for each component is
 identified with a study in stocking area by portable
 terminals.
Cage capacity
Blue box capacity
Contd’
 Distances between each stations both current and
  layout optimized system
 Velocity, loading and unloading times of forklift and
  transpallet
 Relations between each units
Distance calculation
An example;
Simulation model composed of;

 Lüx Asma Rezervuar
 Hero Gömme Rezervuar
SIMULATION MODEL
Facility Layout Optimization
Performance Evaluation and System Design with Simulation Modeling
Performance Evaluation and System Design with Simulation Modeling
Relationship Ranks
Activity Relationship Chart
•Recycling Station and Raw Material
are spread along 14 units

•Semi Product Warehouse I
s spread along 40 units

•Finished Good Warehouse is
spread along 25 units

•Offices are spread along 40units

•Assembly Line 1 is spread along 10 units

•Assembly Line 2 is spread along 15 units

•18 Injection Machines are
spread along 72 units

•1 machine is spread along 4 units
FLAP
FLAP
Performance Evaluation and System Design with Simulation Modeling
Performance Evaluation and System Design with Simulation Modeling
Performance Evaluation and System Design with Simulation Modeling
Performance Evaluation and System Design with Simulation Modeling
 Response surface methodology (RSM) is a
 collection of mathematical and statistical
 techniques that are useful for the modelling and
 analyzing problems in which a response of interest
 is influenced by several variables and the aim is to
 optimize this response.
 In our case the response is production amount
  which affected by number of transpallet and forklift.
 The production amount is response variable of y and
  independent variables are number of transpallet
  and forklift
 The finished goods which quits the injection
  machines are taken into account when they arrive
  the warehouse.
 Hence in simulation model the importance of
  transportation units is incontrovertible.
In order to develop first order metamodel…
Transpallet                       Forklift
 Number of transpallet is         Number of forklift is defined
  defined as 7 as center.           as 2 as center.

 High level of number of          High level of number of
  transpallet is defined as 10.     forklift is defined as 3.

 Low level of number of           Low level of number of
  transpallet is defined as 3.      forklift is defined as 1.
Design Matrix with
Structure of Design MatrixCorresponding Replication
                          Results

                                   Transpalet(X1)   Forklift(X2)   R1      R2      R3      R4      R5

                                   10               3              60500   54300   59900   57500   57500

                                   10               1              58400   58700   59800   58400   59100

                                   3                3              60900   59700   60000   57500   61400

                                   3                1              58100   57500   59700   56400   60700

                                   10               2              57500   61100   57500   60300   57500

                                   3                2              60900   56400   57500   50900   50900

                                   7                3              59200   61100   56400   61300   58200

                                   7                1              61900   59500   61000   56000   58300

                                   7                2              60900   59100   60600   59000   61500



    Regression metamodel is developed and analyzed by using MINITAB 15.
First Order Metamodel
 The regression equation is:
      Y = 55564 + 448 X1 + 1195 X2 - 170 X1X2




S = 2467,20 R-Sq = 4,4%
  R-Sq(adj) = 0,0%
 R-Sq = coeffcient of determination
 R-Sq expresses that the part of the variability of the
  dependent variable with the variability of the
  independent variable.
 R-Sq = 4,4%       4,4 % of the variability on the
  production amount can be explain by the variability of
  the number of transportation units.
Transpalet(X1)   Forklift(X2)   R1      R2      R3      R4      R5

           10               3              60500   54300   59900   57500   57500

           10               1              58400   58700   59800   58400   59100

           3                3              60900   59700   60000   57500   61400

           3                1              58100   57500   59700   56400   60700

           10               2              57500   61100   57500   60300   57500

           3                2              60900   56400   57500   50900   50900

           7                3              59200   61100   56400   61300   58200

           7                1              61900   59500   61000   56000   58300

           7                2              60900   59100   60600   59000   61500


• Some changes on the number of transpallet and forklift
  seems do not affect the production amounts seriously.
• Besides, sometimes it is observed that more production
  amounts in the system in which less transporter units are
  used.
• If the product is carried with box, the choice of transporter (transpallet or
  forklift) is depends on the decision of the operator.

• The criterion of the selection is determined in terms of probability because the
  exact criterion of that decision is not certain.

•    This decision is based on the assumption that if the product is carried with
    box it should be transferred by transpallet with % 50 probability and
    transferred by forklift with % 50 probability.

• Since transpallet and forklift have different carrying capacities for
  boxes, process times are entered to the system as distribution, not constant.

• Hence, variety in production amount is acceptable. If we look at only amounts
  of products which are transported with cages we can see the direct proportion
  between number of transporters and production quantity.
Performance Evaluation and System Design with Simulation Modeling
• Assumptions of Regression
   – Normality of the error terms: Error terms must be normally
     distributed.
   – Constant variance: The variance of distribution of the error
     terms must be constant.
   – Independency of the error terms: Error terms must be
     statistically independent.
 Normality of the Error
         Terms
 Analysis of Linearity



 Residual Analysis for
    Constant Variance
   (Homoscedasticity)



 Residual Analysis for
     Independency
 The regression equation is:
       Y = 54749 + 1880 X1 - 2232 X2 - 112 X1^2 + 857 X2^2 -
  170 X1X2




S = 2398,98 R-Sq = 14,1%
  R-Sq(adj) = 3,0%
• Since increase on R-Sq and R-Sq(adj) is observed and p
 value is decreased, it is decided to continue the RSM
 process from this second order model
 Canonical form
 The regression equation is
      Y = 57012 + 1540 X1 - 3363 X2 - 112 X1^2 + 857 X2^2




S = 2406,00 R-Sq = 11,3%
   R-Sq(adj) = 2,5%
 Canonical analysis is implemented considering the
 stationary points.
• Number of forklift and transpallet should be integer. Hence:
•       are known as eigenvalues
    or characteristic roots of the
    matrix B.
       •   If the all are
           negative,    is a point of
           maximum response,
       •   If the all are
           positive,   is a point of
           minimum response,
       •   If the     have different
           signs,      is a saddle
           point.
 However in our model
                                                  is a point of maximum
                                                  response.



                 Transpalet (X1) Forklift (X2)   R1      R2      R3      R4      R5      Average

                 10               3              60500   54300   59900   57500   57500   57940

                 10               1              58400   58700   59800   58400   59100   58880

                 3                3              60900   59700   60000   57500   61400   59900

                 3                1              58100   57500   59700   56400   60700   58480

                 10               2              57500   61100   57500   60300   57500   58780

                 3                2              60900   56400   57500   50900   50900   55320

                 7                3              59200   61100   56400   61300   58200   59240

                 7                1              61900   59500   61000   56000   58300   59340

                 7                2              60900   59100   60600   59000   61500   60220


7 transpallets and 2 forklifts provide the highest amounts of production units.
 Design table
                 Transpalet(X1)   Forklift(X2)   R1      R2      R3      R4      R5
                 10               3              59600   62400   62700   60400   60200
                 10               1              58600   59300   61000   62500   60200
                 3                3              60700   57800   61500   55800   62200
                 3                1              62900   54600   60800   62200   62200
                 10               2              60100   61900   62700   62500 60200
                 3                2              62900   57800   61500   61300   62200
                 7                3              61300   62900   60200   63000   63000
                 7                1              59500   62200   60200   62100   63900
                 7                2              62100   61900   60200   61700   63000

 First order metamodel
      Y = 62008 - 157 X1 - 772 X2 + 123 X1X2
 S = 1946,67 R-Sq = 4,2%
     R-Sq(adj) = 0,0%
 Facility layout optimization and design implemented
  model has the same situation of the model which has
  no implementation of the facility layout.
 Because of the system is already optimized the R-Sq
  and R-Sq(adj) are very low.
 However we continue with the Second order
  metamodel:
 The regression equation is
      Y = 57019 + 1005 X1 + 1642 X2 - 90,5 X1^2 - 603
  X2^2 + 123 X1X2
• S = 1894,81 R-Sq = 13,7%
     R-Sq(adj) = 2,6%
 Canonical form
 The regression equation is
      Y = 55376 + 1251 X1 + 2463 X2 - 90,5 X1^2 - 603 X2^2




 S = 1895,84 R-Sq = 11,4%
        R-Sq(adj) = 2,5%
• Canonical analysis is implemented considering the
 stationary points.
• Number of forklift and transpallet should be integer. Hence
•       are known as eigenvalues
    or characteristic roots of the
    matrix B.
       • If the all   are
         negative,     is a point
         of maximum response,
       •   If the all are
           positive,     is a point of
           minimum response,
       •   If the have different
           signs,    is a saddle point.
• It is proven that the 7 transpallets
                                and 3 forklifts are efficient to
                                increase production amount by
                                running the simulation model with
                                upgrading number of forklift and
                                transpallet.

Transpalet(X1)   Forklift(X2)   R1      R2      R3      R4      R5      Average

10               3              59600   62400   62700   60400   60200   61060

10               1              58600   59300   61000   62500   60200   60320

3                3              60700   57800   61500   55800   62200   59600

3                1              62900   54600   60800   62200   62200   60540

10               2              60100   61900   62700   62500   60200   61480

3                2              62900   57800   61500   61300   62200   61140

7                3              61300   62900   60200   63000   63000   62080

7                1              59500   62200   60200   62100   63900   61580

7                2              62100   61900   60200   61700   63000   61780
Performance Evaluation and System Design with Simulation Modeling
 Current System                                       • Alternative System 2
 LAYOUT                         NOT OPTIMIZED       LAYOUT                         NOT OPTIMIZED

 RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY   NOT APPLIED         RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY   APPLIED

 NUMBER OF FORKLIFT             1                   NUMBER OF FORKLIFT             2

 NUMBER OF TRANSPALLET          6                   NUMBER OF TRANSPALLET          7

 TOTAL:                         60000               TOTAL:                         61500

 Utilization of Forklift        85.412              Utilization of Forklift        45.635

 Utilization of Transpallet     59.680              Utilization of Transpallet     59.768


  • Alternative System 1                               • Alternative System 3
LAYOUT                              OPTIMIZED     LAYOUT                               OPTIMIZED

RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY        NOT APPLIED   RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY         APPLIED

NUMBER OF FORKLIFT                  1             NUMBER OF FORKLIFT                   3

NUMBER OF TRANSPALLET               6             NUMBER OF TRANSPALLET                7

TOTAL:                              62900         TOTAL:                               63000

Utilization of Forklift             97.325        Utilization of Forklift              37.325

Utilization of Transpallet          59.505        Utilization of Transpallet           59.505
Performance Evaluation and System Design with Simulation Modeling
 Firstly works are begining modeling the current
  system as realistic as possible with Simulation
  software Arena.
 After determining the most produced product of
  the factory, All the data which are related to
  production such as time studies , bill of materials,
  downtimes, defect rates, cycle times are taken.
 The second step of the work is adding second
  product which is Hero Gömme Reservoir in
  simulation model.
 While doing this works in addition to the first step
  of the work
 Transportation times and distances informations
  are added to the model.
 According to product type cage and box capacities
  are determined.
 Relationship chart is constructed and Facility
  Layout Optimization and Design is applied by
  using Flap.
 Response Surface Methodology are used to
 determine the optimum number of transpalet and
 forklift in factory.
Performance Evaluation and System Design with Simulation Modeling
 Work orders can be created according to customer
 orders by this way WIP can be decreased and facility
 becomes appropriate for Lean philosophy.
       In this system injection machines work independently and
        work orders are constant.
 Schedule decision criteria can be added to simulation
 model.
       There is no scheduling method for assignment of work orders
        to the machines.
 There are two more lines in the real system. These can
 be added.
       We added two assembly lines


 If simulation model decides which product will be
 produced by checking demands and arranges which
 product is going to be produced, how much, etc…
 Modelcan be replicated monthly so, it can be analyzed
 in long-term
       Instead of daily
Performance Evaluation and System Design with Simulation Modeling
Performance Evaluation and System Design with Simulation Modeling
Performance Evaluation and System Design with Simulation Modeling

More Related Content

PDF
Computational Optimization, Modelling and Simulation: Recent Trends and Chall...
PDF
Modeling, Simulation and Optimization of a Robotic Flexible Manufacturing Pac...
PPT
Task Sequence en Flexsim
PDF
Modelling, Simulation and Optimization of Refining Processes
PPT
K11038 Mayur control ppt
PPTX
State space analysis shortcut rules, control systems,
PDF
Mathematical modeling and parameter estimation for water quality management s...
PDF
Compressible Flow
Computational Optimization, Modelling and Simulation: Recent Trends and Chall...
Modeling, Simulation and Optimization of a Robotic Flexible Manufacturing Pac...
Task Sequence en Flexsim
Modelling, Simulation and Optimization of Refining Processes
K11038 Mayur control ppt
State space analysis shortcut rules, control systems,
Mathematical modeling and parameter estimation for water quality management s...
Compressible Flow

Viewers also liked (11)

PPT
State space analysis, eign values and eign vectors
PDF
Theory Communication
PPT
Chapter 4
PPT
Simulation & Modeling - Smilulation Queuing System
PPT
Outdoor indoor Propagation
PDF
Automotive engine valve recession (engineering research series)
PPT
Chp. 2 simulation examples
PDF
Interpolation with Finite differences
PPT
Finite DIfference Methods Mathematica
PDF
Modeling, simulation and optimization analysis of steering knuckle component ...
PDF
Modelling and Simulation for Industry 4.0 SUCCESS CASES
State space analysis, eign values and eign vectors
Theory Communication
Chapter 4
Simulation & Modeling - Smilulation Queuing System
Outdoor indoor Propagation
Automotive engine valve recession (engineering research series)
Chp. 2 simulation examples
Interpolation with Finite differences
Finite DIfference Methods Mathematica
Modeling, simulation and optimization analysis of steering knuckle component ...
Modelling and Simulation for Industry 4.0 SUCCESS CASES
Ad

Similar to Performance Evaluation and System Design with Simulation Modeling (20)

PDF
Cost
XLS
Bass Diffusion Model
DOCX
PDF
TTTech Automotive Overview
KEY
slide
DOC
Som case study - dont bother me i cant cope
PPT
Chapter 02
PDF
Salamian dv club_foils_intel_austin
PDF
Ppt compressed sensing a tutorial
PDF
Monte carlo simulation for energy risk management
PPTX
Merton Truck Company
PDF
Dimensioning and Cost Structure Analysis of Wide Area Data Service Network - ...
PDF
(ATS4-PLAT07) Interactive Charts Revamped
PDF
Statistics lecture 11 (chapter 11)
PDF
Pl ple excel_lindo
PDF
Toray’s strategy for_carbon_fiber_composite_materials
XLSX
251109 Or
Cost
Bass Diffusion Model
TTTech Automotive Overview
slide
Som case study - dont bother me i cant cope
Chapter 02
Salamian dv club_foils_intel_austin
Ppt compressed sensing a tutorial
Monte carlo simulation for energy risk management
Merton Truck Company
Dimensioning and Cost Structure Analysis of Wide Area Data Service Network - ...
(ATS4-PLAT07) Interactive Charts Revamped
Statistics lecture 11 (chapter 11)
Pl ple excel_lindo
Toray’s strategy for_carbon_fiber_composite_materials
251109 Or
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
Advanced methodologies resolving dimensionality complications for autism neur...
PDF
cuic standard and advanced reporting.pdf
PDF
Architecting across the Boundaries of two Complex Domains - Healthcare & Tech...
PDF
Profit Center Accounting in SAP S/4HANA, S4F28 Col11
PDF
Electronic commerce courselecture one. Pdf
PDF
Build a system with the filesystem maintained by OSTree @ COSCUP 2025
PPTX
Cloud computing and distributed systems.
PPTX
Digital-Transformation-Roadmap-for-Companies.pptx
PDF
Unlocking AI with Model Context Protocol (MCP)
PDF
TokAI - TikTok AI Agent : The First AI Application That Analyzes 10,000+ Vira...
PDF
Peak of Data & AI Encore- AI for Metadata and Smarter Workflows
PPTX
20250228 LYD VKU AI Blended-Learning.pptx
PPTX
KOM of Painting work and Equipment Insulation REV00 update 25-dec.pptx
PDF
7 ChatGPT Prompts to Help You Define Your Ideal Customer Profile.pdf
PDF
Approach and Philosophy of On baking technology
PDF
Mobile App Security Testing_ A Comprehensive Guide.pdf
PDF
Dropbox Q2 2025 Financial Results & Investor Presentation
PDF
MIND Revenue Release Quarter 2 2025 Press Release
PDF
Review of recent advances in non-invasive hemoglobin estimation
PPTX
VMware vSphere Foundation How to Sell Presentation-Ver1.4-2-14-2024.pptx
Advanced methodologies resolving dimensionality complications for autism neur...
cuic standard and advanced reporting.pdf
Architecting across the Boundaries of two Complex Domains - Healthcare & Tech...
Profit Center Accounting in SAP S/4HANA, S4F28 Col11
Electronic commerce courselecture one. Pdf
Build a system with the filesystem maintained by OSTree @ COSCUP 2025
Cloud computing and distributed systems.
Digital-Transformation-Roadmap-for-Companies.pptx
Unlocking AI with Model Context Protocol (MCP)
TokAI - TikTok AI Agent : The First AI Application That Analyzes 10,000+ Vira...
Peak of Data & AI Encore- AI for Metadata and Smarter Workflows
20250228 LYD VKU AI Blended-Learning.pptx
KOM of Painting work and Equipment Insulation REV00 update 25-dec.pptx
7 ChatGPT Prompts to Help You Define Your Ideal Customer Profile.pdf
Approach and Philosophy of On baking technology
Mobile App Security Testing_ A Comprehensive Guide.pdf
Dropbox Q2 2025 Financial Results & Investor Presentation
MIND Revenue Release Quarter 2 2025 Press Release
Review of recent advances in non-invasive hemoglobin estimation
VMware vSphere Foundation How to Sell Presentation-Ver1.4-2-14-2024.pptx

Performance Evaluation and System Design with Simulation Modeling

  • 1. MERT YİĞİT EDA ACAR MERVE KILIÇ
  • 2.  Founded in 1986 and located in Torbalı İzmir  Produces plastic materials ; flush tanks, internal mechanisms, toilet seats etc…  Eighteen injection machines  Five assembly lines
  • 4. Work steps  Modelling current system  Facility layout optimization and design  Response surface methodology
  • 5. System is simulated over two product as realistic as possible by using Arena software Feasible layout design is obtained by using Flap Optimum number of forklift and transpalet are determined by using RSM
  • 6. Before modelling  Work flow  Bill of material  Operation trees  Time studies  Input analysis  Cycle times  Break downs  Defect rates  Size of the boxes and cages
  • 8. Defect Rates of Machines
  • 12. Time study of Hero Gömme Rezervuar
  • 14. Components are carried ;  boxes or cages 228 cages and 1000 blue boxes Capacity of this boxes and cages for each component is identified with a study in stocking area by portable terminals.
  • 17. Contd’  Distances between each stations both current and layout optimized system  Velocity, loading and unloading times of forklift and transpallet  Relations between each units
  • 19. Simulation model composed of;  Lüx Asma Rezervuar
  • 20.  Hero Gömme Rezervuar
  • 27. •Recycling Station and Raw Material are spread along 14 units •Semi Product Warehouse I s spread along 40 units •Finished Good Warehouse is spread along 25 units •Offices are spread along 40units •Assembly Line 1 is spread along 10 units •Assembly Line 2 is spread along 15 units •18 Injection Machines are spread along 72 units •1 machine is spread along 4 units
  • 28. FLAP
  • 29. FLAP
  • 34.  Response surface methodology (RSM) is a collection of mathematical and statistical techniques that are useful for the modelling and analyzing problems in which a response of interest is influenced by several variables and the aim is to optimize this response.
  • 35.  In our case the response is production amount which affected by number of transpallet and forklift.  The production amount is response variable of y and independent variables are number of transpallet and forklift  The finished goods which quits the injection machines are taken into account when they arrive the warehouse.  Hence in simulation model the importance of transportation units is incontrovertible.
  • 36. In order to develop first order metamodel… Transpallet Forklift  Number of transpallet is  Number of forklift is defined defined as 7 as center. as 2 as center.  High level of number of  High level of number of transpallet is defined as 10. forklift is defined as 3.  Low level of number of  Low level of number of transpallet is defined as 3. forklift is defined as 1.
  • 37. Design Matrix with Structure of Design MatrixCorresponding Replication Results Transpalet(X1) Forklift(X2) R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 10 3 60500 54300 59900 57500 57500 10 1 58400 58700 59800 58400 59100 3 3 60900 59700 60000 57500 61400 3 1 58100 57500 59700 56400 60700 10 2 57500 61100 57500 60300 57500 3 2 60900 56400 57500 50900 50900 7 3 59200 61100 56400 61300 58200 7 1 61900 59500 61000 56000 58300 7 2 60900 59100 60600 59000 61500 Regression metamodel is developed and analyzed by using MINITAB 15.
  • 38. First Order Metamodel  The regression equation is: Y = 55564 + 448 X1 + 1195 X2 - 170 X1X2 S = 2467,20 R-Sq = 4,4% R-Sq(adj) = 0,0%
  • 39.  R-Sq = coeffcient of determination  R-Sq expresses that the part of the variability of the dependent variable with the variability of the independent variable.  R-Sq = 4,4% 4,4 % of the variability on the production amount can be explain by the variability of the number of transportation units.
  • 40. Transpalet(X1) Forklift(X2) R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 10 3 60500 54300 59900 57500 57500 10 1 58400 58700 59800 58400 59100 3 3 60900 59700 60000 57500 61400 3 1 58100 57500 59700 56400 60700 10 2 57500 61100 57500 60300 57500 3 2 60900 56400 57500 50900 50900 7 3 59200 61100 56400 61300 58200 7 1 61900 59500 61000 56000 58300 7 2 60900 59100 60600 59000 61500 • Some changes on the number of transpallet and forklift seems do not affect the production amounts seriously. • Besides, sometimes it is observed that more production amounts in the system in which less transporter units are used.
  • 41. • If the product is carried with box, the choice of transporter (transpallet or forklift) is depends on the decision of the operator. • The criterion of the selection is determined in terms of probability because the exact criterion of that decision is not certain. • This decision is based on the assumption that if the product is carried with box it should be transferred by transpallet with % 50 probability and transferred by forklift with % 50 probability. • Since transpallet and forklift have different carrying capacities for boxes, process times are entered to the system as distribution, not constant. • Hence, variety in production amount is acceptable. If we look at only amounts of products which are transported with cages we can see the direct proportion between number of transporters and production quantity.
  • 43. • Assumptions of Regression – Normality of the error terms: Error terms must be normally distributed. – Constant variance: The variance of distribution of the error terms must be constant. – Independency of the error terms: Error terms must be statistically independent.
  • 44.  Normality of the Error Terms  Analysis of Linearity  Residual Analysis for Constant Variance (Homoscedasticity)  Residual Analysis for Independency
  • 45.  The regression equation is: Y = 54749 + 1880 X1 - 2232 X2 - 112 X1^2 + 857 X2^2 - 170 X1X2 S = 2398,98 R-Sq = 14,1% R-Sq(adj) = 3,0%
  • 46. • Since increase on R-Sq and R-Sq(adj) is observed and p value is decreased, it is decided to continue the RSM process from this second order model
  • 47.  Canonical form  The regression equation is Y = 57012 + 1540 X1 - 3363 X2 - 112 X1^2 + 857 X2^2 S = 2406,00 R-Sq = 11,3% R-Sq(adj) = 2,5%
  • 48.  Canonical analysis is implemented considering the stationary points.
  • 49. • Number of forklift and transpallet should be integer. Hence:
  • 50. are known as eigenvalues or characteristic roots of the matrix B. • If the all are negative, is a point of maximum response, • If the all are positive, is a point of minimum response, • If the have different signs, is a saddle point.
  • 51.  However in our model is a point of maximum response. Transpalet (X1) Forklift (X2) R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 Average 10 3 60500 54300 59900 57500 57500 57940 10 1 58400 58700 59800 58400 59100 58880 3 3 60900 59700 60000 57500 61400 59900 3 1 58100 57500 59700 56400 60700 58480 10 2 57500 61100 57500 60300 57500 58780 3 2 60900 56400 57500 50900 50900 55320 7 3 59200 61100 56400 61300 58200 59240 7 1 61900 59500 61000 56000 58300 59340 7 2 60900 59100 60600 59000 61500 60220 7 transpallets and 2 forklifts provide the highest amounts of production units.
  • 52.  Design table Transpalet(X1) Forklift(X2) R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 10 3 59600 62400 62700 60400 60200 10 1 58600 59300 61000 62500 60200 3 3 60700 57800 61500 55800 62200 3 1 62900 54600 60800 62200 62200 10 2 60100 61900 62700 62500 60200 3 2 62900 57800 61500 61300 62200 7 3 61300 62900 60200 63000 63000 7 1 59500 62200 60200 62100 63900 7 2 62100 61900 60200 61700 63000  First order metamodel Y = 62008 - 157 X1 - 772 X2 + 123 X1X2
  • 53.  S = 1946,67 R-Sq = 4,2% R-Sq(adj) = 0,0%
  • 54.  Facility layout optimization and design implemented model has the same situation of the model which has no implementation of the facility layout.  Because of the system is already optimized the R-Sq and R-Sq(adj) are very low.  However we continue with the Second order metamodel:  The regression equation is Y = 57019 + 1005 X1 + 1642 X2 - 90,5 X1^2 - 603 X2^2 + 123 X1X2
  • 55. • S = 1894,81 R-Sq = 13,7% R-Sq(adj) = 2,6%
  • 56.  Canonical form  The regression equation is Y = 55376 + 1251 X1 + 2463 X2 - 90,5 X1^2 - 603 X2^2  S = 1895,84 R-Sq = 11,4% R-Sq(adj) = 2,5%
  • 57. • Canonical analysis is implemented considering the stationary points.
  • 58. • Number of forklift and transpallet should be integer. Hence
  • 59. are known as eigenvalues or characteristic roots of the matrix B. • If the all are negative, is a point of maximum response, • If the all are positive, is a point of minimum response, • If the have different signs, is a saddle point.
  • 60. • It is proven that the 7 transpallets and 3 forklifts are efficient to increase production amount by running the simulation model with upgrading number of forklift and transpallet. Transpalet(X1) Forklift(X2) R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 Average 10 3 59600 62400 62700 60400 60200 61060 10 1 58600 59300 61000 62500 60200 60320 3 3 60700 57800 61500 55800 62200 59600 3 1 62900 54600 60800 62200 62200 60540 10 2 60100 61900 62700 62500 60200 61480 3 2 62900 57800 61500 61300 62200 61140 7 3 61300 62900 60200 63000 63000 62080 7 1 59500 62200 60200 62100 63900 61580 7 2 62100 61900 60200 61700 63000 61780
  • 62.  Current System • Alternative System 2 LAYOUT NOT OPTIMIZED LAYOUT NOT OPTIMIZED RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY NOT APPLIED RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY APPLIED NUMBER OF FORKLIFT 1 NUMBER OF FORKLIFT 2 NUMBER OF TRANSPALLET 6 NUMBER OF TRANSPALLET 7 TOTAL: 60000 TOTAL: 61500 Utilization of Forklift 85.412 Utilization of Forklift 45.635 Utilization of Transpallet 59.680 Utilization of Transpallet 59.768 • Alternative System 1 • Alternative System 3 LAYOUT OPTIMIZED LAYOUT OPTIMIZED RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY NOT APPLIED RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY APPLIED NUMBER OF FORKLIFT 1 NUMBER OF FORKLIFT 3 NUMBER OF TRANSPALLET 6 NUMBER OF TRANSPALLET 7 TOTAL: 62900 TOTAL: 63000 Utilization of Forklift 97.325 Utilization of Forklift 37.325 Utilization of Transpallet 59.505 Utilization of Transpallet 59.505
  • 64.  Firstly works are begining modeling the current system as realistic as possible with Simulation software Arena.  After determining the most produced product of the factory, All the data which are related to production such as time studies , bill of materials, downtimes, defect rates, cycle times are taken.  The second step of the work is adding second product which is Hero Gömme Reservoir in simulation model.
  • 65.  While doing this works in addition to the first step of the work  Transportation times and distances informations are added to the model.  According to product type cage and box capacities are determined.  Relationship chart is constructed and Facility Layout Optimization and Design is applied by using Flap.  Response Surface Methodology are used to determine the optimum number of transpalet and forklift in factory.
  • 67.  Work orders can be created according to customer orders by this way WIP can be decreased and facility becomes appropriate for Lean philosophy.  In this system injection machines work independently and work orders are constant.  Schedule decision criteria can be added to simulation model.  There is no scheduling method for assignment of work orders to the machines.
  • 68.  There are two more lines in the real system. These can be added.  We added two assembly lines  If simulation model decides which product will be produced by checking demands and arranges which product is going to be produced, how much, etc… Modelcan be replicated monthly so, it can be analyzed in long-term  Instead of daily