Performance measurement DSDV Routing Protocol In Manet _ 043369
- 1. BACHELOR OF COMPUTER SCIENCE (COMPUTER NETWORK SECURITY) WITH HONORS FINAL YEAR PROJECT 1 CSF35104 NAME : NURSYAHIRA BINTI MOHD SALLEH MATRIC NUMBER : BTBL 16043369 SUPERVISOR : DR. NOR AIDA BINTI MAHIDDIN
- 2. Performance measurement of DSDV routing protocol in MANET
- 3. Content Introduction Problem statement Objectives Process model Data model Proof of concept Expected result References
- 4. • infrastructure less wireless network • do not rely on fixed infrastructure • nodes are randomly and free to move in any direction What is MANET? INTRODUCTION
- 5. DESTINATION SEQUENCE DISTANCE VECTOR ? • Is a proactive or table driven routing protocol • Developed by C.Perkins in 1994 • Bellman ford algorithm • Each node in the network maintains a routing table including : a) the next hop b) the metric c) the sequence number
- 6. PROBLEM STATEMENT For larger network, it is difficult to maintain routing table because all nodes in a network maintains table, it leads to overhead which consumes more bandwidth.
- 7. OBJECTIVES • To study the DSDV routing protocol. • To modify parameter number of nodes in DSDV. • To analyze and evaluate DSDV performance in terms of throughput, packet delivery ratio and end to end delay.
- 8. PROCESS MODEL DSDV routing protocol Performance metrics MANET Routing overhead Number of nodes Throughput End to end delay Packet delivery ratio
- 9. DATA MODEL Flowchart of DSDV Flowchart of updating routing table of DSDV
- 10. Start Routes all destination available Change in local topology Forward the packets Updates are initiated by destination with sequence number If sequence number > previous number Forward the packets Tables is either updated or holds for the best metric Forward packet to destination Reject the packet No No Yes Yes End Flowchart of DSDV
- 11. Start Check routing table For each routing information packet received Received sequence = current sequence && received metric < current metric Received sequence >current sequence && received metric<current metric Current metric=received metric Current sequence=received sequence Current metric=received metric Update ignored End Yes No Yes No Flowchart for DSDV updating routing table
- 12. PROOF OF CONCEPT Installation of OMNET++ as platform for this project Installation and configuration of INETMANET (framework) in OMNET++
- 13. Installation of OMNET++ as platform for MANET
- 14. Installation and configuration of INETMANET in OMNET++
- 15. Expected RESULTS
- 17. References 1) Mummadisetty, B. C., Puri, A., & Latifi, S. (2015). Performance Assessment of MANET Routing Protocols. International Journal of Communications, Network and System Sciences, 08(11), 456-470. doi:10.4236/ijcns.2015.811041 2) https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/c84e/30e395464282561b10778a0f8d02d5bc98c4.pdf 3) https://slideplayer.com/slide/4835981/ 4) Pearlin R. F. Sophia, and G. Rekha. “Performance Comparison of AODV, DSDV and DSR Protocols in Mobile Networks using NS-2.” Indian journal of science and technology, vol. 9, no. 8, 2016, doi:10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i8/87948. 5) Bandral, D., & Aggarwal, R. (2016). Simulation Analysis of AODV and DSDV Routing Protocols for Improving Quality of Service in MANET. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(32). doi:10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i32/90089 6) Jha, R. K., & Kharga, P. (2015). A Comparative Performance Analysis of Routing Protocols in MANET using NS3 Simulator. International Journal of Computer Network and Information Security, 7(4), 62-68. doi:10.5815/ijcnis.2015.04.08 7) Lakshman Naik.L, R.U.Khan, R.B.Mishra. (2016). Analysis of Performance Improving Parameters of DSDV using NS-3. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology
Editor's Notes
- #3: Performance DSDV ROUTING PROTOCOL IN different number of nodes using omnet++
- #5: MANET is a system of mobile nodes connected with each other via wireless medium without infrastructured support Infrastructureless network: no fixed base station and mobile nodes can move while communicating. All the nodes present act as routers. Infrastructureless network also called Ad-hoc network which forms temporary networks. In this type of network nodes are portable devices such as mobile phones and laptops. MANET have few of important characteristics which including dynamic topology, bandwidth-constrained, links, energy constrained operation and limited physical security. hence, the routing protocols for wired networks cannot be directly used for wireless networks advantages of MANET : provide access to info and services regardless geographic area transmission range : It is defined by the maximum distance a node can send its data to.
- #6: Metric – number of hop to reach destination
- #7: When more number of nodes, it can lead to routing overhead which consume more bandwidth because all nodes in network maintains table so its difficult to maintain routing table for larger network. LR 2015 – advantages of DSDV, Avoid extra traffic, reduce the amount of space in the routing table
- #11: A node updates a routing table entry if it receives a better route. A better route is one that has a higher sequence number, or a lower hop count if the sequence number is the same.