PP
specifciations
As a table write down 3 specifications of a
good snowman
Frankie’s snowman specification:
● It must be white
● It must be made of snow
● It must have a round shape
● It must have a carrot for its nose
Use Frankie’s specification to
evaluate this snowman:
● Is it white?
● Is it made of snow?
● Does it have a
round shape?
● Does it have a
carrot for it’s nose?
Use Frankie’s specification to
evaluate this snowman:
● Is it white?
● Is it made of snow?
● Does it have a
round shape?
● Does it have a
carrot for its nose?
Use Frankie’s specification to
evaluate this snowman:
● Is it white?
● Is it made of snow?
● Does it have a
round shape?
● Does it have a
carrot for its nose?
Use Frankie’s specification to
evaluate this snowman:
● Is it white?
● Is it made of snow?
● Does it have a
round shape?
● Does it have a
carrot for its nose?
What are the problems with Frankie’s
specifications?
How could these specifications be
improved?
Albert’s specification
Specification
topic Materials Aesthetics Function Size
Specification
detail What materials will be used?
How will it
appear?
To be a
representation of a
man
What size should it
be?
Limited Snow with stick arms Pile of snow
Does not look like a
man Under 0.5m high
Adequate
Snow with stick arms and
stone facial features One snow ball
Looks somewhat like
a man
Over 0.5m and Under
1m high
Substantial
Snow with stick arms, stone
facial features (eyes and
mouth) and a distinct nose
(example a carrot)
Two snow balls
(head and body)
Looks a lot like a
man
Over 1m and under
1.5m high
Rigorous
Snow with stick arms, stone
facial features (eyes and
mouth), a distinct nose
(example a carrot) and a
fabric hat or a scarf
Three snow balls
(Legs, body and
head) Looks like a man Over 1.5m high
Take a look at Albert’s snowman
specifications:
● Why are these specifications
better?
● Why would they be easier to
evaluate?
Personal project specification
You will be required to reflect on and allow
other people to reflect upon your personal
project at the showcase.
For this reason you must develop a suitable
specification
Specifications - Example
Specification stages
1. Identify the details of a rigorous example of
your final outcome using the rigorous goal
outcomes worksheet.
2. For each specification develop a scale from
a limited to adequate to substantial to
rigorous, using the specification worksheet
PP specification
Specifications - Template
Level Descriptor Task specific clarification
1-2 Develop a limited criteria for the
product or outcome
 Some specification stated
 Stated list format
3-4 Develop adequate criteria for
the product or outcome
 Most specification described
 Described list format
5-6 Develop substantial and
appropriate criteria for the
product or outcome
 All specification described
 Specification table attempted
 Suitable range shown for some
specification
7-8 Develop rigorous criteria for the
product or outcome
 All specification described and are suitably
challenging specification identified
 Specification table completed
 Suitable range for all specification
Specification rubric

More Related Content

PPTX
PP specification
PPTX
Fuze casla template power point 2012
PPT
Castlegate Model
PDF
Taking the Dreary Out of The Raiser's Edge Query
PPTX
Global contexts
PPTX
Meeting 4 work in progress
PPTX
Learner profile sayings
PPTX
PP action plans
PP specification
Fuze casla template power point 2012
Castlegate Model
Taking the Dreary Out of The Raiser's Edge Query
Global contexts
Meeting 4 work in progress
Learner profile sayings
PP action plans

More from Neil Commons (20)

PPTX
2. reporting (assessment examples)
PPTX
Meeting 6 - Reflection
PPTX
Taking action completion
PPTX
Science essay structure
PPTX
Meeting 4 work in progress 2
PPTX
Meeting 3 planning
PPTX
Investigation guide8 (updated oct 2016 for grade 8)
PPTX
Investigation guide8 (updated aug 2016)
PPTX
2. reporting
PPTX
3. reporting
PPTX
2. reporting
PPTX
1. reporting
PPTX
Chemicals on trial IDU introduction
PPTX
Meeting 6 - Reflection
PPTX
Meeting 5 deadline and showcase
PPTX
Investigation guide (updated may 2015)
PPTX
You are not an island
PPTX
Meeting #3 - Planning
PPTX
Meeting 2 Research
PPTX
Initial pp supervisor training 2015 16
2. reporting (assessment examples)
Meeting 6 - Reflection
Taking action completion
Science essay structure
Meeting 4 work in progress 2
Meeting 3 planning
Investigation guide8 (updated oct 2016 for grade 8)
Investigation guide8 (updated aug 2016)
2. reporting
3. reporting
2. reporting
1. reporting
Chemicals on trial IDU introduction
Meeting 6 - Reflection
Meeting 5 deadline and showcase
Investigation guide (updated may 2015)
You are not an island
Meeting #3 - Planning
Meeting 2 Research
Initial pp supervisor training 2015 16
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
Τίμαιος είναι φιλοσοφικός διάλογος του Πλάτωνα
PDF
International_Financial_Reporting_Standa.pdf
PDF
Climate and Adaptation MCQs class 7 from chatgpt
PDF
Journal of Dental Science - UDMY (2020).pdf
PDF
IP : I ; Unit I : Preformulation Studies
PDF
CISA (Certified Information Systems Auditor) Domain-Wise Summary.pdf
PPTX
Core Concepts of Personalized Learning and Virtual Learning Environments
PPTX
Share_Module_2_Power_conflict_and_negotiation.pptx
PPTX
Module on health assessment of CHN. pptx
PPTX
A powerpoint presentation on the Revised K-10 Science Shaping Paper
PPTX
DRUGS USED FOR HORMONAL DISORDER, SUPPLIMENTATION, CONTRACEPTION, & MEDICAL T...
PDF
Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment .pdf
PDF
David L Page_DCI Research Study Journey_how Methodology can inform one's prac...
PDF
AI-driven educational solutions for real-life interventions in the Philippine...
PDF
Vision Prelims GS PYQ Analysis 2011-2022 www.upscpdf.com.pdf
PDF
LIFE & LIVING TRILOGY- PART (1) WHO ARE WE.pdf
PPTX
What’s under the hood: Parsing standardized learning content for AI
PDF
BP 704 T. NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS (UNIT 2).pdf
PDF
1.3 FINAL REVISED K-10 PE and Health CG 2023 Grades 4-10 (1).pdf
PDF
Empowerment Technology for Senior High School Guide
Τίμαιος είναι φιλοσοφικός διάλογος του Πλάτωνα
International_Financial_Reporting_Standa.pdf
Climate and Adaptation MCQs class 7 from chatgpt
Journal of Dental Science - UDMY (2020).pdf
IP : I ; Unit I : Preformulation Studies
CISA (Certified Information Systems Auditor) Domain-Wise Summary.pdf
Core Concepts of Personalized Learning and Virtual Learning Environments
Share_Module_2_Power_conflict_and_negotiation.pptx
Module on health assessment of CHN. pptx
A powerpoint presentation on the Revised K-10 Science Shaping Paper
DRUGS USED FOR HORMONAL DISORDER, SUPPLIMENTATION, CONTRACEPTION, & MEDICAL T...
Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment .pdf
David L Page_DCI Research Study Journey_how Methodology can inform one's prac...
AI-driven educational solutions for real-life interventions in the Philippine...
Vision Prelims GS PYQ Analysis 2011-2022 www.upscpdf.com.pdf
LIFE & LIVING TRILOGY- PART (1) WHO ARE WE.pdf
What’s under the hood: Parsing standardized learning content for AI
BP 704 T. NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS (UNIT 2).pdf
1.3 FINAL REVISED K-10 PE and Health CG 2023 Grades 4-10 (1).pdf
Empowerment Technology for Senior High School Guide
Ad

PP specification

  • 1. PP specifciations As a table write down 3 specifications of a good snowman
  • 2. Frankie’s snowman specification: ● It must be white ● It must be made of snow ● It must have a round shape ● It must have a carrot for its nose
  • 3. Use Frankie’s specification to evaluate this snowman: ● Is it white? ● Is it made of snow? ● Does it have a round shape? ● Does it have a carrot for it’s nose?
  • 4. Use Frankie’s specification to evaluate this snowman: ● Is it white? ● Is it made of snow? ● Does it have a round shape? ● Does it have a carrot for its nose?
  • 5. Use Frankie’s specification to evaluate this snowman: ● Is it white? ● Is it made of snow? ● Does it have a round shape? ● Does it have a carrot for its nose?
  • 6. Use Frankie’s specification to evaluate this snowman: ● Is it white? ● Is it made of snow? ● Does it have a round shape? ● Does it have a carrot for its nose?
  • 7. What are the problems with Frankie’s specifications? How could these specifications be improved?
  • 8. Albert’s specification Specification topic Materials Aesthetics Function Size Specification detail What materials will be used? How will it appear? To be a representation of a man What size should it be? Limited Snow with stick arms Pile of snow Does not look like a man Under 0.5m high Adequate Snow with stick arms and stone facial features One snow ball Looks somewhat like a man Over 0.5m and Under 1m high Substantial Snow with stick arms, stone facial features (eyes and mouth) and a distinct nose (example a carrot) Two snow balls (head and body) Looks a lot like a man Over 1m and under 1.5m high Rigorous Snow with stick arms, stone facial features (eyes and mouth), a distinct nose (example a carrot) and a fabric hat or a scarf Three snow balls (Legs, body and head) Looks like a man Over 1.5m high
  • 9. Take a look at Albert’s snowman specifications: ● Why are these specifications better? ● Why would they be easier to evaluate?
  • 10. Personal project specification You will be required to reflect on and allow other people to reflect upon your personal project at the showcase. For this reason you must develop a suitable specification
  • 12. Specification stages 1. Identify the details of a rigorous example of your final outcome using the rigorous goal outcomes worksheet. 2. For each specification develop a scale from a limited to adequate to substantial to rigorous, using the specification worksheet
  • 15. Level Descriptor Task specific clarification 1-2 Develop a limited criteria for the product or outcome  Some specification stated  Stated list format 3-4 Develop adequate criteria for the product or outcome  Most specification described  Described list format 5-6 Develop substantial and appropriate criteria for the product or outcome  All specification described  Specification table attempted  Suitable range shown for some specification 7-8 Develop rigorous criteria for the product or outcome  All specification described and are suitably challenging specification identified  Specification table completed  Suitable range for all specification Specification rubric

Editor's Notes

  • #8: Highlight that specifications which require a yes or no do not make for a very descriptive evaluation
  • #10: These evaluation provide a range and also incorporate personal opnion