IgnacioSD11JT
Download as PPTX, PDF0 likes175 views
The document provides an overview of a facility master plan study for the Ignacio School District. It summarizes the district's enrollment history and forecasts, current facility capacities, and key observations. The study found modest growth expected, enrollment rebounding but erratic births, and facilities showing lack of spaces for special education and music. Elementary enrollment is near capacity and could be compromised in 2-5 years. The intermediate school could be used more efficiently and all school levels could benefit from comprehensive educational specifications and long-term plans.
IgnacioSD11JT
- 1. IGNACIO SCHOOL DISTRICT 11JTFacility Master Plan Elements OverviewPresented byStrategic Resources West, Inc.(303) 688-7963June 29, 2009
- 2. Master Plan Study SummaryEconomics andDemographics
- 3. Development Potential & Student Generation
- 4. Enrollment History & Forecasts
- 6. Facility Adequacy – 2009 to 2014
- 7. Summary and ObservationsMajor Employment Sectors: 2007
- 8. Census Population: 2000 to 2007 est.
- 9. Population and Distribution by Age Range and vis-à-vis Total:2000 Census
- 11. Housing Units Built by Period
- 13. Retail Sales
- 14. Assessed Value & Bonding Capacity
- 15. Economic PotentialLimited residential development potential; anticipate slow growth
- 16. Water & sanitary sewer controlled by Southern Utes
- 17. Major influence on employment from relatively few industries
- 18. Distance to employment; lack of local jobs
- 19. Housing affordability; advantageous for 11JT?
- 24. Capacity EstimatesThree methodologies plus District Program:
- 25. Castaldi
- 27. Oklahoma Department of Education
- 29. Room size
- 31. Efficiency
- 32. Optimum/maximum
- 33. Program qualityCapacity Estimates by Methodology
- 35. Capacity per Grade Balance
- 36. Key ObservationsModest growth potential expected
- 37. Child population (enrollment) has rebounded
- 38. Births have been erratic but increasing recently
- 39. Age of facilities is evident in lack of spaces designed for special ed., music, etc.
- 40. Elementary enrollment is near its capacity and may be compromised in 2-5 years
- 41. Intermediate school could be used more efficiently but design & enrollment are limitingKey Observations – con’tIntermediate’s capacity is adequate but could be compromised
- 42. Jr. High lacks certain amenities in its building, e.g. library & cafeteria
- 43. Certain Sr. High spaces used for purposes other than original design, e.g. training (Rm. 3) & Resource (Rm. 5)
- 44. Per grade capacity imbalances among school levels may cause utilization inefficienciesKey Observations – con’tLack of comprehensive programming in design leads to cumbersome utilization, particularly with joint use spaces
- 45. All school levels could benefit from developing a thorough educational specification and appropriate long-term plan to achieve
- 46. Site development or improvement should incorporate planning for all modes of access, including safe walking routesKey Observations – con’tDistrict should establish school site size and related standards in policy
- 47. Might be a good opportunity to cooperate with the Town re: Elementary School sale and relocation (if financially feasible)
- 48. Coordination important regarding future development to west
- 49. Land dedication or cash-in-lieu: