PUMA-560 Robot Manipulator Position Computed Torque Control Methods Using MATLAB/SIMULINK and Their Integration into Graduate Nonlinear Control and MATLAB Courses

Farzin Piltan , Mohammad Hossein Yarmahmoudi, Mohammad Shamsodini, Ebrahim Mazlomian & Ali
Hosainpour
International Journal of Robotics and Automation, (IJRA), Volume (3) : Issue (3) : 2012 167
PUMA-560 Robot Manipulator Position Computed
Torque Control Methods Using MATLAB/SIMULINK
and Their Integration into Graduate Nonlinear
Control and MATLAB Courses
Farzin Piltan SSP.ROBOTIC@yahoo.com
Industrial Electrical and Electronic
Engineering SanatkadeheSabze
Pasargad. CO (S.S.P. Co), NO:16
,PO.Code 71347-66773, Fourth floor
Dena Apr , Seven Tir Ave , Shiraz , Iran
Mohammad Hossein Yarmahmoudi SSP.ROBOTIC@yahoo.com
Mohammad Shamsodini SSP.ROBOTIC@yahoo.com
Ebrahim Mazlomian SSP.ROBOTIC@yahoo.com
Ali Hosainpour SSP.ROBOTIC@yahoo.com
Abstract
This paper describes the MATLAB/SIMULINK realization of the PUMA 560 robot manipulator
position control methodology. This paper focuses on design, analyzed and implements nonlinear
computed torque control (CTC) methods. These simulation models are developed as a part of a
software laboratory to support and enhance graduate/undergraduate robotics courses, nonlinear
control courses and MATLAB/SIMULINK courses at research and development company (SSP
Co.) research center, Shiraz, Iran.
Keywords: MATLAB/SIMULINK, PUMA 560 Robot Manipulator, Position Control Method,
Computed Torque Control, Robotics, Nonlinear Control.

Hosainpour
d
..
d
.
d q,q,q
d
..
d
.
d X,X,X a
..
a
.
a X,X,X
1. INTRODUCTION
Computer modeling, simulation and implementation tools have been widely used to support and
develop nonlinear control, robotics, and MATLAB/SIMULINK courses. MATLAB with its toolboxes
such as SIMULINK [1] is one of the most accepted software packages used by researchers to
enhance teaching the transient and steady-state characteristics of control and robotic courses
[3_7]. In an effort to modeling and implement robotics, nonlinear control and advanced
MATLAB/SIMULINK courses at research and development SSP Co., authors have developed
MATLAB/SIMULINK models for learn the basic information in field of nonlinear control and
industrial robot manipulator [8, 9].
Controller is a device which can sense information from linear or nonlinear system (e.g., robot
manipulator) to improve the systems performance [3]. The main targets in designing control
systems are stability, good disturbance rejection, and small tracking error[5]. Several industrial
robot manipulators are controlled by linear methodologies (e.g., Proportional-Derivative (PD)
controller, Proportional- Integral (PI) controller or Proportional- Integral-Derivative (PID)
controller), but when robot manipulator works with various payloads and have uncertainty in
dynamic models this technique has limitations. From the control point of view, uncertainty is
divided into two main groups: uncertainty in unstructured inputs (e.g., noise, disturbance) and
uncertainty in structure dynamics (e.g., payload, parameter variations). In some applications robot
manipulators are used in an unknown and unstructured environment, therefore strong
mathematical tools used in new control methodologies to design nonlinear robust controller with
an acceptable performance (e.g., minimum error, good trajectory, disturbance rejection). Joint
space and operational space control are closed loop controllers which they have been used to
provide robustness and rejection of disturbance effect. The main target in joint space controller is
design a feedback controller that allows the actual motion ( ) tracking of the desired motion (
). This control problem is classified into two main groups. Firstly, transformation the desired
motion to joint variable by inverse kinematics of robot manipulators [6]. Figure 1
shows the main block diagram of joint space controller. The main target in operational space
controller is to design a feedback controller to allow the actual end-effector motion to track
the desired endeffector motion . This control methodology requires a greater algorithmic
complexity and the inverse kinematics used in the feedback control loop. Direct measurement of
operational space variables are very expensive that caused to limitation used of this controller in
industrial robot manipulators[6]. Figure 2 shows the main block diagram of operational space
control.
FIGURE 1: Block diagram of joint space control
FIGURE 2: Block diagram of operational space control
ττττ a
..
a
.
a q,q,q
ττττ

Hosainpour
Computed torque controller (CTC) is a powerful nonlinear controller which it widely used in
control of robot manipulator. It is based on feedback linearization and computes the required arm
torques using the nonlinear feedback control law. This controller works very well when all
dynamic and physical parameters are known but when the robot manipulator has variation in
dynamic parameters, in this situation the controller has no acceptable performance[14]. In
practice, most of physical systems (e.g., robot manipulators) parameters are unknown or time
variant, therefore, computed torque like controller used to compensate dynamic equation of robot
manipulator[1, 6]. Research on computed torque controller is significantly growing on robot
manipulator application which has been reported in [1, 6, 15-16]. Vivas and Mosquera [15]have
proposed a predictive functional controller and compare to computed torque controller for tracking
response in uncertain environment. However both controllers have been used in feedback
linearization, but predictive strategy gives better result as a performance. A computed torque
control with non parametric regression models have been presented for a robot arm[16]. This
controller also has been problem in uncertain dynamic models. Based on [1, 6]and [15-16]
computed torque controller is a significant nonlinear controller to certain systems which it is based
on feedback linearization and computes the required arm torques using the nonlinear feedback
control law.
This paper is organized as follows:
In section 2, dynamic formulation of robot manipulator is presented. Detail of classical CTC and
MATLAB/SIMULINK implementation of this controller is presented in section 3. In section 4, the
simulation result is presented and finally in section 5, the conclusion is presented.
2. PUMA 560 ROBOT MANIPULATOR DYNAMIC FORMULATION
Dynamics of PUMA560 Robot Manipulator: To position control of robot manipulator, the
second three axes are locked the dynamic equation of PUMA robot manipulator is given by [77-
80];
(1)
Where
(2)
is computed as
(3)
(4)

Hosainpour
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
and Corilios ( ) matrix is calculated as the following
(14)
Where,
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)

Hosainpour
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
(25)
(26)
consequently coriolis matrix is shown as bellows;
(27)
Moreover Centrifugal ( ) matrix is demonstrated as
(28)
Where,
(29)
(30)
(31)
(32)
(33)

Hosainpour
(34)
(35)
(36)
In this research , as a result
(37)
Gravity ( ) Matrix can be written as
(38)
Where,
(39)
(40)
(41)
Suppose is written as follows
(42)
and is introduced as
(43)
can be written as
(44)
Therefore for PUMA robot manipulator is calculated by the following equations
(45)
(46)

Hosainpour
(47)
(48)
(49)
(50)
An information about inertial constant and gravitational constant are shown in Tables 1 and 2
based on the studies carried out by Armstrong [80] and Corke and Armstrong [81].
TABLE 1: Inertial constant reference (Kg.m
2
)
TABLE 2: Gravitational constant (N.m)

Hosainpour
3. CONTROL: COMPUTED TORQUE CONTROLLER ANALYSIS,
MODELLING AND IMPLEMENTATION ON PUMA 560 ROBOT
MANIPULATOR
Computed torque controller (CTC) is a powerful nonlinear controller which it widely used in
control of robot manipulator. It is based on feedback linearization and computes the required arm
torques using the nonlinear feedback control law. This controller works very well when all
dynamic and physical parameters are known but when the robot manipulator has variation in
dynamic parameters, in this situation the controller has no acceptable performance[14]. In
practice, most of physical systems (e.g., robot manipulators) parameters are unknown or time
variant, therefore, computed torque like controller used to compensate dynamic equation of robot
manipulator[1, 6]. Research on computed torque controller is significantly growing on robot
manipulator application which has been reported in [1, 6, 15-16]. Vivas and Mosquera [15]have
proposed a predictive functional controller and compare to computed torque controller for tracking
response in uncertain environment. However both controllers have been used in feedback
linearization, but predictive strategy gives better result as a performance. A computed torque
control with non parametric regression models have been presented for a robot arm[16]. This
controller also has been problem in uncertain dynamic models. Based on [1, 6]and [15-16]
computed torque controller is a significant nonlinear controller to certain systems which it is based
on feedback linearization and computes the required arm torques using the nonlinear feedback
control law. When all dynamic and physical parameters are known, computed torque controller
works fantastically; practically a large amount of systems have uncertainties, therefore sliding
mode controller is one of the best case to solve this challenge.
The central idea of Computed torque controller (CTC) is feedback linearization so, originally this
algorithm is called feedback linearization controller. It has assumed that the desired motion
trajectory for the manipulator , as determined, by a path planner. Defines the tracking error
as:
(51)
Where e(t) is error of the plant, is desired input variable, that in our system is desired
displacement, is actual displacement. If an alternative linear state-space equation in the
form can be defined as
(52)
With and this is known as the Brunousky canonical form. By
equation (51) and (52) the Brunousky canonical form can be written in terms of the state
as [1]:
(53)
With
(54)
Then compute the required arm torques using inverse of equation (55), is;
(55)
This is a nonlinear feedback control law that guarantees tracking of desired trajectory. Selecting
proportional-plus-derivative (PD) feedback for U(t) results in the PD-computed torque controller
[6];
(56)

Hosainpour
and the resulting linear error dynamics are
(57)
According to the linear system theory, convergence of the tracking error to zero is guaranteed [6].
Where and are the controller gains. The result schemes is shown in Figure 3, in which two
feedback loops, namely, inner loop and outer loop, which an inner loop is a compensate loop and
an outer loop is a tracking error loop.
FIGURE 3: Block diagram of PD-computed torque controller (PD-CTC)
The application of proportional-plus-derivative (PD) computed torque controller to control of
PUMA 560 robot manipulator introduced in this part. Suppose that in (58) the nonlinearity term
defined by the following term
(58)
Therefore the equation of PD-CTC for control of PUMA 560 robot manipulator is written as the
equation of (59);
(59)

Hosainpour
The controller based on a formulation (59) is related to robot dynamics therefore it has problems
in uncertain conditions.
Implemented Computed Torque Controller
In first step, constructed dynamics and kinematics blocks (i.e., plant) with power supply will be put
in work space. The main object is implementation of controller block. According to PD equation
which is , the linearized part will be created like Figure 4. The linearized part so
called PID. As it is obvious, the parameter e is the difference of actual and desired values and is
the change of error. K p and k v are proportional and derivative gains and d is double derivative of
the joint variable. A sample of PD controller block for one joint is like Figure 5.
FIGURE 4: PD Controller for a joint variable
As it is seen in Figure 4 the error value and the change of error were chosen to exhibit in
measurement center. In this block by changing gain values, the best control system will be
applied. In the second step according to torque formulation in CTC mode, all constructed blocks
just connect to each other as blew. In Figure 5 the N ( ) is the dynamic parameters block (i.e.,
A set of Coriolis, Centrifugal and Gravity blocks).

Hosainpour
FIGURE 5: The general diagram of controller
The inputs are thetas and the final outputs are torque values. The relations between other blocks
are just multiplication and summation as mentioned in torque equation. In the next step transform
our subsystems into a general system to form controller block and the outputs will be connected
to the plant, in order to execute controlling process. Then, trigger the main inputs with power
supply to check validity and performance. In Figure 6, Dynamics, Kinematics and Controller
blocks are shown.

Hosainpour
FIGURE 6 : Controller, Dynamics and Kinematics Blocks
4. RESULTS
PD-Computed torque controller (PD-CTC) and PID-Computed torque controller (PID-CTC) were
tested to Step and Ramp responses. In this simulation the first, second, and third joints are
moved from home to final position without and with external disturbance. The simulation was
implemented in MATLAB/SIMULINK environment. It is noted that, these systems are tested by
band limited white noise with a predefined 40% of relative to the input signal amplitude which the
sample time is equal to 0.1. This type of noise is used to external disturbance in continuous and
hybrid systems.
Trajectory Performance
Figures 7 and 8 show tracking performance for PD-CTC and PID CTC without disturbance for two
type trajectories. The optimal coefficients in Step PID CTC are; and
in Ramp PID CTC are; as well as similarly in Step and Ramp PD
CTC are; ; From the simulation for first, second, and third links, it was seen
that the different controller gains have the different performance. Tuning parameters of PID-CTC
and PD-CTC for PUMA robot manipulator are shown in Tables 3 to 6.

Hosainpour
1Pk 1Vk 1Ik 2pk 2Vk 2Ik 3pk 3Vk 3Ik RMS
error
SS
error1
SS
error 2
SS
error 3
1 70 24 70 70 24 70 70 24 70 2.276e-5 -3.81e-5 -3.81e-5 -3.81e-5
2 50 24 70 50 24 70 50 24 70 3.34e-5 -5.6e-5 -5.6e-5 -5.6e-5
3 70 15 75 70 15 75 70 15 75 0 0 0 0
4 70 24 50 70 24 50 70 24 50 3.7e-5 -6.2e-5 -6.2e-5 -6.2e-5
TABLE 3: Tuning parameters of a step PID-CTC
1Pk 1Vk 1Ik 2pk 2Vk 2Ik 3pk 3Vk 3Ik RMS
error
SS
error1
SS
error 2
SS
error 3
1 90 10 25 90 10 25 90 10 25 -1.2e-6 -1.6e-6 -1.6e-6 -1.6e-6
2 50 10 25 50 10 25 50 10 25 -4.5e-9 -6e-9 -6e-9 -6e-9
3 90 3 25 90 3 25 90 3 25 -8.8e-7 -1.17e-6 -1.17e-6 -1.17e-6
4 90 10 10 90 10 10 90 10 10 -2.4e-5 -3.2e-5 -3.2e-5 -3.2e-5
TABLE 4: Tuning parameters of a ramp PID-CTC
1Pk 1Vk 2pk 2Vk 3pk 3Vk RMs error SS
error1
SS error 2 SS error3
1 8 4 8 4 8 4 2.276e-5 -3.81e-5 -3.81e-5 -3.81e-5
2 30 4 30 4 30 4 1.34e-5 -3.6e-5 -2.54e-5 -1.6e-5
3 1 4 1 4 1 4 0.0039 0.0065 0.0065 0.0065
4 8 40 8 40 8 40 0.502 5.043 5.043 5.043
5 8 0.5 8 0.5 8 0.5 0.0026 0.0043 0.0043 0.0043
TABLE 5: Tuning parameters of a step PD-CTC
1Pk 1Vk 2pk 2Vk 3pk 3Vk RMs error SS
error1
SS error 2 SS error3
1 8 4 8 4 8 4 3.2e-5 -2.81e-5 -2.6e-5 -2.1e-5
2 30 4 30 4 30 4 -6e-5 -8e-5 -8.6e-5 -8.9e-5
3 1 4 1 4 1 4 0.000305 0.00024 0.00024 0.00024
4 8 40 8 40 8 40 0.6 4.93 4.93 4.93
5 8 0.5 8 0.5 8 0.5 0.5 2.9 2.9 2.9
TABLE 6: Tuning parameters of a ramp PD-CTC

Hosainpour
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
0
2
4
Y1Signal
First Link
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
0
2
4
Y2Signal
Second Link
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
0
2
4
Y3Signal
Time
Third Link
PD-CTC
PID-CTC
PD-CTC
PID-CTC
PD-CTC
PID-CTC
FIGURE 7: Step PID-CTC and PD-CTC for First, second and third link trajectory

Hosainpour
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
0
1
2
3
Y1Signal
First link
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
0
1
2
3
Y2Signal
Second link
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
0
1
2
3
Y3Signal
Time
Third link
PD-CTC
PID-CTC
PD-CTC
PID-CTC
PD-CTC
PID-CTC
FIGURE 8: Ramp PID-CTC and PD-CTC for First, second and third link trajectory
By comparing step response trajectory without disturbance in PD and PID CTC, it is found that
the PID's overshoot (1.32%) is lower than PD's (6.44%), although both of them have about the
same rise time; PID CTC (0.5 sec) and PD CTC (0.403 sec). Besides the Steady State and RMS
error in PID (Steady State error =0 and RMS error=0) is fairly lower than PD (Steady State
error and RMS error= ).
In above graphs over the same period, it is created that the PD and PID CTC are increased
slightly, but PD CTC at has very low distortion, after bought of graphs remain
are unchanged as mentioned to the Tables 4 and 6.
Disturbance Rejection: Figures 9 and 10 have shown the power disturbance elimination in PD
and PID CTC. The main target in this controller is disturbance rejection as well as the other
responses. A band limited white noise with predefined of 40% the power of input signal is applied
to the Step and Ramp PD and PID CTC. It found fairly fluctuations in trajectory responses. As
mentioned earlier, CTC works very well when all parameters are known, this challenge plays
important role to select the SMC as a based robust controller in this research.

Hosainpour
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
0
2
4
6
Y1Signal
First link
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
0
2
4
6
Y2Signal
Second link
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
0
2
4
6
Y3Signal
Time
Third link
PD-CTC
PID-CTC
PD-CTC
PID-CTC
PD-CTC
PID-CTC
FIGURE 9: Step PID-CTC and PD-CTC for First, second and third link trajectory with disturbance.

Hosainpour
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
0
1
2
3
Y1Signal
First link
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
0
1
2
3
Y2Signal
Second link
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
0
1
2
3
Y3Signal
Time
Third link
PD-CTC
PID-CTC
PD-CTC
PID-CTC
PD-CTC
PID-CTC
FIGURE 10: Ramp PID-CTC and PD-CTC for First, second and third link trajectory with disturbance.
Among above graphs (9 and 10) relating to Step and Ramp trajectories following with external
disturbance, PID CTC and PD CTC have fairly fluctuations. By comparing some control
parameters such as overshoot, rise time, steady state and RMS error it computed that the PID's
overshoot (1.8%) is lower than PD's (8%), although both of them have about the same rise time;
PID CTC (0.5 sec) and PD CTC (0.41 sec), the Steady State and RMS error in PID (Steady
State error = -0.0019 and RMS error=0.0025) is fairly lower than PD (Steady State error
and RMS error= ).
Errors in the model: Figures 11 and 12 have shown the error disturbance in PD and PID CTC.
The controllers with no external disturbances have the same error response, but PID CTC has
the better steady state error when the robot manipulator has external disturbance. Furthermore
the RMS error profile for PID CTC is sharply dropped compared to the PD CTC.

Hosainpour
FIGURE 11: Step PID-CTC and PD-CTC for First, second and third link steady state and RMS error with
disturbance.
FIGURE 12: Ramp PID-CTC and PD-CTC for First, second and third link steady state and RMS error with
disturbance.

Hosainpour
The errors in PID CTC and PD CTC is widely increased among of error graphs (11 and 12)
relating to Step and Ramp response with external disturbance. By comparing the steady state
and RMS error it observed that the PID's State and RMS error (Steady State error = -0.0019
and RMS error=0.0025) is lower than PD's (Steady State error and RMS
error= ). When applied disturbance in these controllers it is computed that the steady state
and RMS error increased rapidly approximately 130%.
5. CONCLUSION
In this research we introduced, basic concepts of robot manipulator (e.g., PUMA 560 robot
manipulator) and control methodology. PUMA 560 robot manipulator is a 6 DOF serial robot
manipulator. From the control point of view, robot manipulator divides into two main parts i.e.
kinematics and dynamic parts. The dynamic parameters of this system are highly nonlinear. To
control of this system nonlinear control methodology (computed torque controller) is introduced.
Computed torque controller (CTC) is an influential nonlinear controller to certain and partly
uncertain systems which it is based on feedback linearization and computes the required arm
torques using the nonlinear feedback control law. When all dynamic and physical parameters are
known computed torque controller works superbly.
REFERENCES
[1] T. R. Kurfess, Robotics and automation handbook: CRC, 2005.
[2] J. J. E. Slotine and W. Li, Applied nonlinear control vol. 461: Prentice hall Englewood Cliffs,
NJ, 1991.
[3] K. Ogata, Modern control engineering: Prentice Hall, 2009.
[4] L. Cheng, Z. G. Hou, M. Tan, D. Liu and A. M. Zou, "Multi-agent based adaptive consensus
control for multiple manipulators with kinematic uncertainties," 2008, pp. 189-194.
[5] J. J. D'Azzo, C. H. Houpis and S. N. Sheldon, Linear control system analysis and design
with MATLAB: CRC, 2003.
[6] B. Siciliano and O. Khatib, Springer handbook of robotics: Springer-Verlag New York Inc,
2008.
[7] I. Boiko, L. Fridman, A. Pisano and E. Usai, "Analysis of chattering in systems with second-
order sliding modes," IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, No. 11, vol. 52,pp. 2085-
2102, 2007.
[8] J. Wang, A. Rad and P. Chan, "Indirect adaptive fuzzy sliding mode control: Part I: fuzzy
switching," Fuzzy Sets and Systems, No. 1, vol. 122,pp. 21-30, 2001.
[9] C. Wu, "Robot accuracy analysis based on kinematics," IEEE Journal of Robotics and
Automation, No. 3, vol. 2, pp. 171-179, 1986.
[10] H. Zhang and R. P. Paul, "A parallel solution to robot inverse kinematics," IEEE conference
proceeding, 2002, pp. 1140-1145.
[11] J. Kieffer, "A path following algorithm for manipulator inverse kinematics," IEEE conference
proceeding, 2002, pp. 475-480.
[12] Z. Ahmad and A. Guez, "On the solution to the inverse kinematic problem(of robot)," IEEE
conference proceeding, 1990, pp. 1692-1697.

Hosainpour
[13] F. T. Cheng, T. L. Hour, Y. Y. Sun and T. H. Chen, "Study and resolution of singularities for
a 6-DOF PUMA manipulator," Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics, IEEE
Transactions on, No. 2, vol. 27, pp. 332-343, 2002.
[14] M. W. Spong and M. Vidyasagar, Robot dynamics and control: Wiley-India, 2009.
[15] A. Vivas and V. Mosquera, "Predictive functional control of a PUMA robot," Conference
Proceedings, 2005.
[16] D. Nguyen-Tuong, M. Seeger and J. Peters, "Computed torque control with nonparametric
regression models," IEEE conference proceeding, 2008, pp. 212-217.
[17] V. Utkin, "Variable structure systems with sliding modes," Automatic Control, IEEE
Transactions on, No. 2, vol. 22, pp. 212-222, 2002.
[18] R. A. DeCarlo, S. H. Zak and G. P. Matthews, "Variable structure control of nonlinear
multivariable systems: a tutorial," Proceedings of the IEEE, No. 3, vol. 76, pp. 212-232,
2002.
[19] K. D. Young, V. Utkin and U. Ozguner, "A control engineer's guide to sliding mode control,"
IEEE conference proceeding, 2002, pp. 1-14.
[20] O. Kaynak, "Guest editorial special section on computationally intelligent methodologies and
sliding-mode control," IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, No. 1, vol. 48, pp. 2-3,
2001.
[21] J. J. Slotine and S. Sastry, "Tracking control of non-linear systems using sliding surfaces,
with application to robot manipulators†," International Journal of Control, No. 2, vol. 38, pp.
465-492, 1983.
[22] J. J. E. Slotine, "Sliding controller design for non-linear systems," International Journal of
Control, No. 2, vol. 40, pp. 421-434, 1984.
[23] R. Palm, "Sliding mode fuzzy control," IEEE conference proceeding,2002, pp. 519-526.
[24] C. C. Weng and W. S. Yu, "Adaptive fuzzy sliding mode control for linear time-varying
uncertain systems," IEEE conference proceeding, 2008, pp. 1483-1490.
[25] M. Ertugrul and O. Kaynak, "Neuro sliding mode control of robotic manipulators,"
Mechatronics Journal, No. 1, vol. 10, pp. 239-263, 2000.
[26] P. Kachroo and M. Tomizuka, "Chattering reduction and error convergence in the sliding-
mode control of a class of nonlinear systems," Automatic Control, IEEE Transactions on, No.
7, vol. 41, pp. 1063-1068, 2002.
[27] H. Elmali and N. Olgac, "Implementation of sliding mode control with perturbation estimation
(SMCPE)," Control Systems Technology, IEEE Transactions on, No. 1, vol. 4, pp. 79-85,
2002.
[28] J. Moura and N. Olgac, "A comparative study on simulations vs. experiments of SMCPE,"
IEEE conference proceeding, 2002, pp. 996-1000.
[29] Y. Li and Q. Xu, "Adaptive Sliding Mode Control With Perturbation Estimation and PID
Sliding Surface for Motion Tracking of a Piezo-Driven Micromanipulator," Control Systems
Technology, IEEE Transactions on, No. 4, vol. 18, pp. 798-810, 2010.

Hosainpour
[30] B. Wu, Y. Dong, S. Wu, D. Xu and K. Zhao, "An integral variable structure controller with
fuzzy tuning design for electro-hydraulic driving Stewart platform," IEEE conference
proceeding, 2006, pp. 5-945.
[31] Farzin Piltan , N. Sulaiman, Zahra Tajpaykar, Payman Ferdosali, Mehdi Rashidi, “Design
Artificial Nonlinear Robust Controller Based on CTLC and FSMC with Tunable Gain,”
International Journal of Robotic and Automation, 2 (3): 205-220, 2011.
[32] Farzin Piltan, A. R. Salehi and Nasri B Sulaiman.,” Design artificial robust control of second
order system based on adaptive fuzzy gain scheduling,” world applied science journal
(WASJ), 13 (5): 1085-1092, 2011.
[33] Farzin Piltan, N. Sulaiman, Atefeh Gavahian, Samira Soltani, Samaneh Roosta, “Design
Mathematical Tunable Gain PID-Like Sliding Mode Fuzzy Controller with Minimum Rule
Base,” International Journal of Robotic and Automation, 2 (3): 146-156, 2011.
[34] Farzin Piltan , A. Zare, Nasri B. Sulaiman, M. H. Marhaban and R. Ramli, , “A Model Free
Robust Sliding Surface Slope Adjustment in Sliding Mode Control for Robot Manipulator,”
World Applied Science Journal, 12 (12): 2330-2336, 2011.
[35] Farzin Piltan , A. H. Aryanfar, Nasri B. Sulaiman, M. H. Marhaban and R. Ramli “Design
Adaptive Fuzzy Robust Controllers for Robot Manipulator,” World Applied Science Journal,
12 (12): 2317-2329, 2011.
[36] Farzin Piltan, N. Sulaiman , Arash Zargari, Mohammad Keshavarz, Ali Badri , “Design PID-
Like Fuzzy Controller With Minimum Rule Base and Mathematical Proposed On-line
Tunable Gain: Applied to Robot Manipulator,” International Journal of Artificial intelligence
and expert system, 2 (4):184-195, 2011.
[37] Farzin Piltan, Nasri Sulaiman, M. H. Marhaban and R. Ramli, “Design On-Line Tunable Gain
Artificial Nonlinear Controller,” Journal of Advances In Computer Research, 2 (4): 75-83,
2011.
[38] Farzin Piltan, N. Sulaiman, Payman Ferdosali, Iraj Assadi Talooki, “ Design Model Free
Fuzzy Sliding Mode Control: Applied to Internal Combustion Engine,” International Journal of
Engineering, 5 (4):302-312, 2011.
[39] Farzin Piltan, N. Sulaiman, Samaneh Roosta, M.H. Marhaban, R. Ramli, “Design a New
Sliding Mode Adaptive Hybrid Fuzzy Controller,” Journal of Advanced Science &
Engineering Research , 1 (1): 115-123, 2011.
[40] Farzin Piltan, Atefe Gavahian, N. Sulaiman, M.H. Marhaban, R. Ramli, “Novel Sliding Mode
Controller for robot manipulator using FPGA,” Journal of Advanced Science & Engineering
Research, 1 (1): 1-22, 2011.
[41] Farzin Piltan, N. Sulaiman, A. Jalali & F. Danesh Narouei, “Design of Model Free Adaptive
Fuzzy Computed Torque Controller: Applied to Nonlinear Second Order System,”
International Journal of Robotics and Automation, 2 (4):232-244, 2011.
[42] Farzin Piltan, N. Sulaiman, Iraj Asadi Talooki, Payman Ferdosali, “Control of IC Engine:
Design a Novel MIMO Fuzzy Backstepping Adaptive Based Fuzzy Estimator Variable
Structure Control ,” International Journal of Robotics and Automation, 2 (5):360-380, 2011.

Hosainpour
[43] Farzin Piltan, N. Sulaiman, Payman Ferdosali, Mehdi Rashidi, Zahra Tajpeikar, “Adaptive
MIMO Fuzzy Compensate Fuzzy Sliding Mode Algorithm: Applied to Second Order Nonlinear
System,” International Journal of Engineering, 5 (5): 380-398, 2011.
[44] Farzin Piltan, N. Sulaiman, Hajar Nasiri, Sadeq Allahdadi, Mohammad A. Bairami, “Novel
Robot Manipulator Adaptive Artificial Control: Design a Novel SISO Adaptive Fuzzy Sliding
Algorithm Inverse Dynamic Like Method,” International Journal of Engineering, 5 (5): 399-
418, 2011.
[45] Farzin Piltan, N. Sulaiman, Sadeq Allahdadi, Mohammadali Dialame, Abbas Zare, “Position
Control of Robot Manipulator: Design a Novel SISO Adaptive Sliding Mode Fuzzy PD Fuzzy
Sliding Mode Control,” International Journal of Artificial intelligence and Expert System, 2
(5):208-228, 2011.
[46] Farzin Piltan, SH. Tayebi HAGHIGHI, N. Sulaiman, Iman Nazari, Sobhan Siamak, “Artificial
Control of PUMA Robot Manipulator: A-Review of Fuzzy Inference Engine And Application to
Classical Controller ,” International Journal of Robotics and Automation, 2 (5):401-425, 2011.
[47] Farzin Piltan, N. Sulaiman, Abbas Zare, Sadeq Allahdadi, Mohammadali Dialame, “Design
Adaptive Fuzzy Inference Sliding Mode Algorithm: Applied to Robot Arm,” International
Journal of Robotics and Automation , 2 (5): 283-297, 2011.
[48] Farzin Piltan, Amin Jalali, N. Sulaiman, Atefeh Gavahian, Sobhan Siamak, “Novel Artificial
Control of Nonlinear Uncertain System: Design a Novel Modified PSO SISO Lyapunov
Based Fuzzy Sliding Mode Algorithm ,” International Journal of Robotics and Automation, 2
(5): 298-316, 2011.
[49] Farzin Piltan, N. Sulaiman, Amin Jalali, Koorosh Aslansefat, “Evolutionary Design of
Mathematical tunable FPGA Based MIMO Fuzzy Estimator Sliding Mode Based Lyapunov
Algorithm: Applied to Robot Manipulator,” International Journal of Robotics and Automation,
2 (5):317-343, 2011.
[50] Farzin Piltan, N. Sulaiman, Samaneh Roosta, Atefeh Gavahian, Samira Soltani,
“Evolutionary Design of Backstepping Artificial Sliding Mode Based Position Algorithm:
Applied to Robot Manipulator,” International Journal of Engineering, 5 (5):419-434, 2011.
[51] Farzin Piltan, N. Sulaiman, S.Soltani, M. H. Marhaban & R. Ramli, “An Adaptive sliding
surface slope adjustment in PD Sliding Mode Fuzzy Control for Robot Manipulator,”
International Journal of Control and Automation , 4 (3): 65-76, 2011.
[52] Farzin Piltan, N. Sulaiman, Mehdi Rashidi, Zahra Tajpaikar, Payman Ferdosali, “Design and
Implementation of Sliding Mode Algorithm: Applied to Robot Manipulator-A Review ,”
International Journal of Robotics and Automation, 2 (5):265-282, 2011.
[53] Farzin Piltan, N. Sulaiman, Amin Jalali, Sobhan Siamak, and Iman Nazari, “Control of Robot
Manipulator: Design a Novel Tuning MIMO Fuzzy Backstepping Adaptive Based Fuzzy
Estimator Variable Structure Control ,” International Journal of Control and Automation, 4
(4):91-110, 2011.
[54] Farzin Piltan, N. Sulaiman, Atefeh Gavahian, Samaneh Roosta, Samira Soltani, “On line
Tuning Premise and Consequence FIS: Design Fuzzy Adaptive Fuzzy Sliding Mode
Controller Based on Lyaponuv Theory,” International Journal of Robotics and Automation, 2
(5):381-400, 2011.

Hosainpour
[55] Farzin Piltan, N. Sulaiman, Samaneh Roosta, Atefeh Gavahian, Samira Soltani, “Artificial
Chattering Free on-line Fuzzy Sliding Mode Algorithm for Uncertain System: Applied in
Robot Manipulator,” International Journal of Engineering, 5 (5):360-379, 2011.
[56] Farzin Piltan, N. Sulaiman and I.AsadiTalooki, “Evolutionary Design on-line Sliding Fuzzy
Gain Scheduling Sliding Mode Algorithm: Applied to Internal Combustion Engine,”
International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 3 (10):7301-7308, 2011.
[57] Farzin Piltan, Nasri B Sulaiman, Iraj Asadi Talooki and Payman Ferdosali.,” Designing On-
Line Tunable Gain Fuzzy Sliding Mode Controller Using Sliding Mode Fuzzy Algorithm:
Applied to Internal Combustion Engine,” world applied science journal (WASJ), 15 (3): 422-
428, 2011.
[58] B. K. Yoo and W. C. Ham, "Adaptive control of robot manipulator using fuzzy compensator,"
Fuzzy Systems, IEEE Transactions on, No. 2, vol. 8, pp. 186-199, 2002.
[59] H. Medhaffar, N. Derbel and T. Damak, "A decoupled fuzzy indirect adaptive sliding mode
controller with application to robot manipulator," International Journal of Modelling,
Identification and Control, No. 1, vol. 1, pp. 23-29, 2006.
[60] Y. Guo and P. Y. Woo, "An adaptive fuzzy sliding mode controller for robotic manipulators,"
Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, IEEE Transactions on, No.
2, vol. 33, pp. 149-159, 2003.
[61] C. M. Lin and C. F. Hsu, "Adaptive fuzzy sliding-mode control for induction servomotor
systems," Energy Conversion, IEEE Transactions on, No. 2, vol. 19, pp. 362-368, 2004.
[62] N. Sulaiman, Z. A. Obaid, M. Marhaban and M. Hamidon , "Design and Implementation of
FPGA-Based Systems-A Review," Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, No. 4,
vol. 3, pp. 3575-3596, 2009.
[63] X. Shao and D. Sun, "Development of an FPGA-based motion control ASIC for robotic
manipulators," IEEE Conference , 2006, pp. 8221-8225.
[64] Y. S. Kung, K. Tseng, C. Chen, H. Sze and A. Wang, "FPGA-implementation of inverse
kinematics and servo controller for robot manipulator," Proc. IEEE Int. on Robotics and
Biomimetics, pp. 1163–1168, 2006.
[65] X. Shao, D. Sun and J. K. Mills, "A new motion control hardware architecture with FPGA-
based IC design for robotic manipulators," IEEE Conference, 2006, pp. 3520-3525.
[66] Y. S. Kung, C. S. Chen and G. S. Shu, "Design and Implementation of a Servo System for
Robotic Manipulator," CACS, 2005.
[67] U. D. Meshram and R. Harkare, "FPGA Based Five Axis Robot Arm Controller," IEEE
Conference, 2005, pp. 3520-3525.
[68] U. Meshram, P. Bande, P. Dwaramwar and R. Harkare, "Robot arm controller using FPGA,"
IEEE Conference, 2009, pp. 8-11.
[69] Y. S. Kung and G. S. Shu, "Development of a FPGA-based motion control IC for robot arm,"
IEEE Conference, 2006, pp. 1397-1402.

Hosainpour
[70] Z. A. Obaid, N. Sulaiman and M. Hamidon, "Developed Method of FPGA-based Fuzzy Logic
Controller Design with the Aid of Conventional PID Algorithm," Australian Journal of Basic
and Applied Sciences, No. 3, vol. 3, pp. 2724-2740, 2009.
[71] S. T. Karris, Digital circuit analysis and design with Simulink modeling and introduction to
CPLDs and FPGAs: Orchard Pubns, 2007.
[72] K. D. Rogers, "Acceleration and implementation of a DSP phase-based frequency
estimation algorithm: MATLAB/SIMULINK to FPGA via XILINX system generator," Citeseer,
2004.
[73] F. J. Lin, D. H. Wang and P. K. Huang, "FPGA-based fuzzy sliding-mode control for a linear
induction motor drive," IEEE journal of electrical power application, No. 5, Vol. 152, 2005,
pp. 1137-1148.
[74] R. R. Ramos, D. Biel, E. Fossas and F. Guinjoan, "A fixed-frequency quasi-sliding control
algorithm: application to power inverters design by means of FPGA implementation," Power
Electronics, IEEE Transactions on, No. 1, vol. 18, pp. 344-355, 2003.
[75] Xiaosong. Lu, "An investigation of adaptive fuzzy sliding mode control for robot manipulator,"
Carleton university Ottawa,2007.
[76] S. Lentijo, S. Pytel, A. Monti, J. Hudgins, E. Santi and G. Simin, "FPGA based sliding mode
control for high frequency power converters," IEEE Conference, 2004, pp. 3588-3592.
[77] B. S. R. Armstrong, "Dynamics for robot control: friction modeling and ensuring excitation
during parameter identification," 1988.
[78] C. L. Clover, "Control system design for robots used in simulating dynamic force and
moment interaction in virtual reality applications," 1996.
[79] K. R. Horspool, Cartesian-space Adaptive Control for Dual-arm Force Control Using
Industrial Robots: University of New Mexico, 2003.
[80] B. Armstrong, O. Khatib and J. Burdick, "The explicit dynamic model and inertial parameters
of the PUMA 560 arm," IEEE Conference, 2002, pp. 510-518.
[81] P. I. Corke and B. Armstrong-Helouvry, "A search for consensus among model parameters
reported for the PUMA 560 robot," IEEE Conference, 2002, pp. 1608-1613.
[82] Farzin Piltan, N. Sulaiman, M. H. Marhaban, Adel Nowzary, Mostafa Tohidian,” “Design of
FPGA based sliding mode controller for robot manipulator,” International Journal of Robotic
and Automation, 2 (3): 183-204, 2011.
[83] I. Eksin, M. Guzelkaya and S. Tokat, "Sliding surface slope adjustment in fuzzy sliding mode
controller," Mediterranean Conference, 2002, pp. 160-168.
[78] Samira Soltani & Farzin Piltan, “Design Artificial Nonlinear Controller Based on Computed
Torque like Controller with Tunable Gain”. World Applied Science Journal,14 (9): 1306-
1312, 2011.
[71] Farzin Piltan, H. Rezaie, B. Boroomand, Arman Jahed,” Design robust back stepping
online tuning feedback linearization control applied to IC engine,” International Journal of
Advance Science and Technology, 42: 183-204, 2012.

Hosainpour
[72] Farzin Piltan, I. Nazari, S. Siamak, P. Ferdosali ,”Methodology of FPGA-based
mathematical error-based tuning sliding mode controller” International Journal of Control
and Automation, 5(1): 89-110, 2012.
[73] Farzin Piltan, M. A. Dialame, A. Zare, A. Badri ,”Design Novel Lookup table changed Auto
Tuning FSMC: Applied to Robot Manipulator” International Journal of Engineering, 6(1):
25-40, 2012.
[74] Farzin Piltan, B. Boroomand, A. Jahed, H. Rezaie ,”Methodology of Mathematical Error-
Based Tuning Sliding Mode Controller” International Journal of Engineering, 6(2): 96-112,
2012.
[75] Farzin Piltan, F. Aghayari, M. R. Rashidian, M. Shamsodini, ”A New Estimate Sliding Mode
Fuzzy Controller for Robotic Manipulator” International Journal of Robotics and
Automation, 3(1): 45-58, 2012.
[76] Farzin Piltan, M. Keshavarz, A. Badri, A. Zargari , ”Design novel nonlinear controller
applied to robot manipulator: design new feedback linearization fuzzy controller with
minimum rule base tuning method” International Journal of Robotics and Automation,
3(1): 1-18, 2012.
[77] Piltan, F., et al. "Design sliding mode controller for robot manipulator with artificial tunable
gain". Canaidian Journal of pure and applied science, 5 (2), 1573-1579, 2011.
[78] Piltan, F., et al. "Design sliding mode controller for robot manipulator with artificial tunable
gain". Canaidian Journal of pure and applied science, 5 (2), 1573-1579, 2011.
[79] Farzin Piltan, A. Hosainpour, E. Mazlomian, M.Shamsodini, M.H Yarmahmoudi. ”Online
Tuning Chattering Free Sliding Mode Fuzzy Control Design: Lyapunov Approach”
International Journal of Robotics and Automation, 3(3): 2012.
[80] Farzin Piltan, R. Bayat, F. Aghayari, B. Boroomand. “Design Error-Based Linear Model-Free
Evaluation Performance Computed Torque Controller” International Journal of Robotics and
Automation, 3(3): 2012.
[81] Farzin Piltan, S. Emamzadeh, Z. Hivand, F. Shahriyari & Mina Mirazaei . ” PUMA-560 Robot
Manipulator Position Sliding Mode Control Methods Using MATLAB/SIMULINK and Their
Integration into Graduate/Undergraduate Nonlinear Control, Robotics and MATLAB
Courses” International Journal of Robotics and Automation, 3(3): 2012.
[82] Farzin Piltan, J. Meigolinedjad, S. Mehrara, S. Rahmdel. ” Evaluation Performance of 2nd
Order Nonlinear System: Baseline Control Tunable Gain Sliding Mode Methodology”
International Journal of Robotics and Automation, 3(3): 2012.
[83] Farzin Piltan, S. Rahmdel, S. Mehrara, R. Bayat.” Sliding Mode Methodology Vs. Computed
Torque Methodology Using MATLAB/SIMULINK and Their Integration into Graduate
Nonlinear Control Courses” International Journal of Engineering, 3(3): 2012.
[84] Farzin Piltan, M. Mirzaie, F. Shahriyari, Iman Nazari & S. Emamzadeh.” Design Baseline
Computed Torque Controller” International Journal of Engineering, 3(3): 2012.

PUMA-560 Robot Manipulator Position Computed Torque Control Methods Using MATLAB/SIMULINK and Their Integration into Graduate Nonlinear Control and MATLAB Courses

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Viewers also liked (7)

Similar to PUMA-560 Robot Manipulator Position Computed Torque Control Methods Using MATLAB/SIMULINK and Their Integration into Graduate Nonlinear Control and MATLAB Courses (20)

More from Waqas Tariq (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

PUMA-560 Robot Manipulator Position Computed Torque Control Methods Using MATLAB/SIMULINK and Their Integration into Graduate Nonlinear Control and MATLAB Courses