SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Radioactive Particle Tracking (RPT)
Gas
Liquid
Gas
Detector
In RPT, the motion of a tracer particle
designed to be the marker of the phase whose
velocity is to be mapped, is tracked
The tracer particle is normally a gamma ray
emitter
The particle is made neutrally buoyant for
tracking liquid phase, and for tracking granular
solids, the size, shape and density of the tracer
particle is matched to that of the granular
material
 An array of detector is placed around the
vessel to record the photon counts
 The first level processing yields the
Lagrangian position time series of the tracer
particle
 Secondary processing leads to Eulerian
mean velocities, moments of velocity
fluctuations , and other flow quantities
Photon counts time series
Lagrangian
position time
series
Lagrangian velocity time
series
Eulerian
grid
Eulerian
velocity
i
,
j
,
k
i
,
j
+
1
,
k
r, θ i, j, k
i, j, k+1
i, j, k+2
r, z
-0.15
-0.1
-0.05
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
r/R [-]
z=25 cm
z=15 cm
z=7.5 cm
Mean
Axial
Velocity
of
Solid
[m/s]
Steps in RPT
RPT
Calibration Photon counting and
data collection
Reconstruction
Experimental
(direct
measurement at
all possible
position in the
column)
Monte Carlo based
(numerical)
Velocity reconstruction
(time differentiation of
two successive position)
Post processing of
instantaneous
fluctuations
(Hardware)
(Hardware)
(Software)
(Software)
Flow chart of Radioactive Particle Tracking
(RPT)
(Limtrakul et al. (2005))
RPT Experiments (counts from
detector)
Instantaneous Position of the
Particle
Instantaneous velocity (time
differentiation of two
successive position)
Ensemble Average Velocity
Fluctuating Velocity
Reynolds stress
Reconstruction
Algorithm
Calibration (Distance count
map)
Root Mean Square Velocity
Kinetic Energy
i
,
j
,
k
i
,
j
,
k
+
1
r, θ
r, z
i, j, k
i, j, k+1
i, j, k+2
Eulerian grid
1 2 3 .... N
q
v v v v
v
N
  

Quantities Calculated from RPT
Experimental data
Instantaneous Velocity
Ensemble average velocity
Fluctuating velocity component
RMS velocity
Stress
Fluctuating kinetic energy per unit volume
z
z
v
t



( , , )
,
1
1
( , , ) ( , , )
( , , )
N i j k
q q n
n
v i j k v i j k
N i j k 
  
'
( , , ) ( , , ) ( , , )
q q q
v i j k v i j k v i j k
   
'2
RMS
q q
v v
    
' '
( , , ) ( , , )
qs p q s
v i j k v i j k
 
  
'2 '2 '2
1
[ ]
2
p r z
KE v v v


        
Hardware Needed to Perform RPT
Experiment
• Radioactive Source
(gamma ray source)
• Scintillation Detector
(used for photon collection)
• Multi Input Data Acquisition System (MIDAS)
(used for photon acquisition )
• Data Acquisition Machine (PC)
(used for storage of data)
Detector Functioning
Detector
Crystal
Photo
Multiplier
Tube
Multi
Channel
Analyzer
Photocathode Anode
 ray
Signal BNC cable
High Voltage
Supply cable
Number
of
Photons
in
given
energy
bin
Counted Photon Energy
Photopeak
Flow Chart of Data Acquisition System
γ ray Photo
Multiplier Tube
Pre amplifier
High
Voltage
Amplifier
Single Channel
Analyzer
To Data
Acquisition
Detector Crystal (NaI (Tl))
Multi Input Data
Acquisition System
(MIDAS)
Experimental Calibration
Radio active particle tracking implemnetation
0
400
800
1200
1600
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Counts
Distance from Detector Centre(mm)
Detector 12
Distance Count Map from ‘in-situ’
Experimental Calibration
Photon Detection
Tracer particle releases
photons at solid angle of 4π.
Only a small fraction of
released photons are incident
on the detector crystal.
If the photon is capable of
penetrating through the
detector, it does not
contribute to counts.
Photons that are absorbed by
the detector crystal are
considered as a counts.
Photon fronts
Detector
L
ρ
α

min

cri
m
ax
X
Z
ρ
X
ma
x

mi
n
Solid Angle Subtended by the Tracer Particle at
the detector for Different Particle Locations
When tracer particle is placed
out side the detector disk
When tracer particle is placed
within the detector disk
Radio active particle tracking implemnetation

L
L

h


L
L
h

h L

h
L
L
Top entrance bottom exit Top entrance lateral exit
Lateral entrance, bottom exit Lateral entrance lateral exit
Possible Cases By Which Photon Can Travel In
Detector
 
 
 
 












 d
d
l
r
n
r
D
N
j
j
j
abs 

 exp
1
exp
.
1
3








abs
abs
A
A
T
C


1
Photon Count Rate:
Absolute Efficiency of Detector:
Monte Carlo Simulation
Count
Vs
Distance
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
-600
-400
-200
0
200
400
600
Distance
(in
mm)
Count
Count
Vs
Distance
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
-600
-400
-200
0
200
400
600
Distance
(in
mm)
Count
Count
Vs
Distance
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
-600
-400
-200
0
200
400
600
Distance
(in
mm)
Count
Line Spread Response Function (LSRF) from
Monte Carlo Program
0
200
400
600
800
1000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Distance from Detector Axis, cm
Photon
Counts
Effective field of view
Area Spread Response Function (ASRF) from
Monte Carlo Program
RPT Performance Parameters
Roy, Larachi, Al-Dahhan and Dudukovic (2002), Appl. Radiat. & Isotopes, 56, 485-503.
r
C
C
Sr



1
Sensitivity:
C
r
c
r




Resolution:
- measure of ability of detector(s)
to record a change in tracer
particle location
- measure of uncertainty in locating
tracer particle
Wish:
- highest sensitivity, i.e., high S
- highest resolution, i.e., low s
   



N
i i
T z
y
x
z
y
x 1
2
2
,
,
1
,
,
1


   



N
i
i
T z
y
x
S
z
y
x
S
1
2
2
,
,
,
,
For a combination of detectors:
Effect of Number of Detectors in Same Plane
Increase in Resolution ~ No Improvement
in Resolution
Increase in Sensitivity
Resolution Sensitivity
mm mm-1
Effect of Multiple Detectors at Different
Axis Number of detector used = 6
1
3
5
2
4
6
Front View
140
mm
140
mm
3
1,
5
2,6
4
Top View
Detectors
Resolution
Sensitivity
mm mm-1
Steps in RPT
RPT
Calibration Photon counting and
data collection
Reconstruction
Experimental
(direct
measurement at
all possible
position in the
column)
Monte Carlo based
(numerical)
Velocity reconstruction
(time differentiation of
two successive position)
Post processing of
instantaneous
fluctuations
(Hardware)
(Hardware)
(Software)
(Software)
Reported Position Reconstruction
Algorithms
• Weighted least squares algorithm
• Monte Carlo algorithm
• Neural network based reconstruction
• Cross correlation algorithm
Weighted Least Square Method
• In this method a distance count map is created by
placing the particle at different known locations.
• This step is called ‘calibration’.
Distance Count Map
0
200
400
600
800
1000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Distance from Detector Axis, cm
Photon
Counts
• Then the counts recorded during calibration is
fitted in a polynomial equation and distance from
each detector is calculated.
Where
ri is the distance of tracer particle from the ith
detector
Ii is the intensity recorded at the ith
detector.
and a0, a1, a2 are constants.
2
1 2
1 1
.....
i oi i i
i i
r a a a
I I
   
   
   
   
• ri and Ii is calculated form distance count map. Like, for
detector 9 at 10 cm distance, 1200 counts is recorded on
detector.
• Then actual RPT experiment is performed.
• Now the co-ordinate of tracer particle is calculated by
estimating by least squares method:
1 1 1
| | (| | | | | |) | | | | | |
T T
b X W X X W Z
  

Where:
b= co-ordinate of the tracer particle.
Z= experimentally measured distance.
X= hardware constant depend upon the co-ordinates of the
centre of the detector.
W= Weighting function
2
1
1
2
1
0
| |
1
0
N
W



 
 
 
 
      
 
 
 
 
 
 
Z, X and W can
be represented
as:
m
i i
r
 
1 1 1
2 2 2
1 2 2 2
1 2 2 2
| |
1 2 2 2
N N N
x y z
x y z
X
x y z
  
 
 
  
 

 
       
 
  
 
2 2 2 2
1 1 1 1
2 2 2 2
2 2 2 2
2 2 2 2
( )
( )
| |
( )
( )
N N N N
r x y z
r x y z
Z
r x y z
 
  
 
  
 

 
        
 
  
 
 
Where-
xi, yi, zi are the co-ordinates of the ith
detector.
 
 
 
 












 d
d
l
r
n
r
D
N
j
j
j
abs 

 exp
1
exp
.
1
3








abs
abs
A
A
T
C


1
Photon Count Rate:
Absolute Efficiency of Detector:
Monte Carlo Simulation
Fine Grids
Coarse
Grid
Iterative Grid Refinement
Estimate the neighborhood in an
iterative manner matching the
“predicted” counts and the
measured counts…
2D Reconstruction with Monte Carlo
Algorithm
-- Reconstructed points
-- actual points
3D Reconstruction with Monte Carlo
Algorithm
Actual results
Reconstructed result
0 100 200
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
x (mm)
z
(mm)
0 100 200
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
x (mm)
z
(mm)
0 100 200
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
x (mm)
z
(mm)
0 100 200
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
x (mm0
z
(mm)
Reconstruction of Particle Trajectories
0-6 sec 0-12 sec 0-18 sec 0-30 sec
-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Vz
(mm/s)
Time (s)
-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Vy
(mm/s)
Time (s)
-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Vy
(mm/s)
Time (s)
Instantaneous Velocity
Total occurrences in the cell (nr=4) = 1238
-50 -25 0 25 50
0
50
100
150
-50 -25 0 25 50
0
50
100
150
Axial Velocity (cm/s)
Azimuthal Velocity (cm/s)
Radial Velocity (cm/s)
-50 -25 0 25 50
0
50
100
150
Frequency
Frequenc
y
Frequenc
y
Middle (r=3.29 cm)
Total occurrences in the cell (nr=1) = 1104
-50 -25 0 25 50
0
50
100
150
Radial Velocity (cm/s)
-50 -25 0 25 50
0
50
100
150
Azimuthal Velocity (cm/s)
-50 -25 0 25 50
0
50
100
150
Axial Velocity (cm/s)
Frequency
Frequency
Frequency
Axis (r=0.047 cm)
-50 -25 0 25 50
0
50
100
150
Total occurrences in the cell (nr=7) = 1333
-50 -25 0 25 50
0
50
100
150
Azimuthal Velocity (cm/s)
-50 -25 0 25 50
0
50
100
150
Frequency
Axial Velocity (cm/s)
Frequenc
y
Frequenc
y
Wall (r=6.13 cm)
Instantaneous Velocity
Quantities Calculated from RPT
Experimental data
Instantaneous Velocity
Ensemble average velocity
Fluctuating velocity component
RMS velocity
Stress
Fluctuating kinetic energy per unit volume
z
z
v
t



( , , )
,
1
1
( , , ) ( , , )
( , , )
N i j k
q q n
n
v i j k v i j k
N i j k 
  
'
( , , ) ( , , ) ( , , )
q q q
v i j k v i j k v i j k
   
'2
RMS
q q
v v
    
' '
( , , ) ( , , )
qs p q s
v i j k v i j k
 
  
'2 '2 '2
1
[ ]
2
p r z
KE v v v


        
Photon counts time series
Lagrangian
position time
series
Lagrangian velocity time
series
Eulerian
grid
Eulerian
velocity
i
,
j
,
k
i
,
j
+
1
,
k
r, θ i, j, k
i, j, k+1
i, j, k+2
r, z
-0.15
-0.1
-0.05
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
r/R [-]
z=25 cm
z=15 cm
z=7.5 cm
Mean
Axial
Velocity
of
Solid
[m/s]
Solids Mean Velocity
i
,
j
,
k
i
,
j
+
1
,
k
r, θ
i, j, k
i, j, k+1
i, j, k+2
r, z
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
r/R [-]
z/H = 0.06
z/H = 0.19
z/H = 0.46
Ug = 1.12 m/s
Mean
Axial
Velocity
of
Glass
[cm/s]
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
r/R [-]
z/H=0.1
z/H=0.3
z/H=0.5
Mean
Radial
Velocity
of
glass[cm/s]
Ug= 1.12 m/s
Radio active particle tracking implemnetation
Radio active particle tracking implemnetation
Radio active particle tracking implemnetation
Radio active particle tracking implemnetation
Radio active particle tracking implemnetation
Radio active particle tracking implemnetation

More Related Content

PDF
CERN-THESIS-2011-016
PDF
05Seuntjens-MonteCarloIntro.pdf
PDF
JOHN_RAE_1102333_PROJECTREPORT
PDF
WOO thesis
PDF
Efficiency calculations
PPT
Introduction ES_scintillation_detectors_06.ppt
PPTX
Radiation dosimtery princicles
PDF
BenThesis
CERN-THESIS-2011-016
05Seuntjens-MonteCarloIntro.pdf
JOHN_RAE_1102333_PROJECTREPORT
WOO thesis
Efficiency calculations
Introduction ES_scintillation_detectors_06.ppt
Radiation dosimtery princicles
BenThesis

Similar to Radio active particle tracking implemnetation (20)

PDF
FAST実験3:新型大気蛍光望遠鏡の試験観測報告
PPT
ES_scintillation_detectors_06.ppt
PDF
First results from the full-scale prototype for the Fluorescence detector Arr...
PPTX
ieee nss mic 2016 poster N30-21
PPTX
Metrology in Nuclear Power Plant
PPTX
Constructing and Calibrating a Neutron Detector Using Cosmic Rays
PDF
HgI2 As X-Ray Imager: Modulation Transfer Function Approach
PPTX
upload RADIATION DETECTION AND MEASUREMENT.pptx
PDF
Liu_George LLE 2010 summer report
PPT
Simulation of Soft Photon Calorimeter @ 2011 JINR, Dubna Student Practice
PPTX
1st present for_darspberry
PDF
Master thesispresentation
PPTX
Nuclear radiation detecters
PDF
Elisabetta_Nocerino_Master_Thesis
PPTX
RADIATION DETECTION AND MEASUREMENT ppt 2.pptx
PDF
A superconducting nanowire single-photon camera with 400,000 pixels
PDF
Gerardo zavala guzman
PDF
slac-r-680
PDF
Ieee 2016 nss mic poster N30-21
FAST実験3:新型大気蛍光望遠鏡の試験観測報告
ES_scintillation_detectors_06.ppt
First results from the full-scale prototype for the Fluorescence detector Arr...
ieee nss mic 2016 poster N30-21
Metrology in Nuclear Power Plant
Constructing and Calibrating a Neutron Detector Using Cosmic Rays
HgI2 As X-Ray Imager: Modulation Transfer Function Approach
upload RADIATION DETECTION AND MEASUREMENT.pptx
Liu_George LLE 2010 summer report
Simulation of Soft Photon Calorimeter @ 2011 JINR, Dubna Student Practice
1st present for_darspberry
Master thesispresentation
Nuclear radiation detecters
Elisabetta_Nocerino_Master_Thesis
RADIATION DETECTION AND MEASUREMENT ppt 2.pptx
A superconducting nanowire single-photon camera with 400,000 pixels
Gerardo zavala guzman
slac-r-680
Ieee 2016 nss mic poster N30-21
Ad

More from prmsgr0 (7)

PPTX
Bubble column and designing models with flow
PPTX
phenomena of multiphase reactor performance
PPTX
Multiphase flows quanitifications and averaging
PPTX
Flow patterns in multiphase flows and designs
PPTX
Fluidisation models and their drag formulations
PPTX
Continous stirred tank reactor and applications.pptx
PPTX
Biochemistry and Biomolecules scince with animations
Bubble column and designing models with flow
phenomena of multiphase reactor performance
Multiphase flows quanitifications and averaging
Flow patterns in multiphase flows and designs
Fluidisation models and their drag formulations
Continous stirred tank reactor and applications.pptx
Biochemistry and Biomolecules scince with animations
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

DOCX
573137875-Attendance-Management-System-original
PPT
Project quality management in manufacturing
PDF
III.4.1.2_The_Space_Environment.p pdffdf
PPTX
Geodesy 1.pptx...............................................
PPTX
Sustainable Sites - Green Building Construction
PPTX
FINAL REVIEW FOR COPD DIANOSIS FOR PULMONARY DISEASE.pptx
PPTX
Engineering Ethics, Safety and Environment [Autosaved] (1).pptx
PDF
Human-AI Collaboration: Balancing Agentic AI and Autonomy in Hybrid Systems
PPTX
MET 305 2019 SCHEME MODULE 2 COMPLETE.pptx
PPTX
CARTOGRAPHY AND GEOINFORMATION VISUALIZATION chapter1 NPTE (2).pptx
PPTX
Fundamentals of safety and accident prevention -final (1).pptx
PDF
TFEC-4-2020-Design-Guide-for-Timber-Roof-Trusses.pdf
PPTX
Foundation to blockchain - A guide to Blockchain Tech
PDF
Mohammad Mahdi Farshadian CV - Prospective PhD Student 2026
PPTX
UNIT 4 Total Quality Management .pptx
PDF
Mitigating Risks through Effective Management for Enhancing Organizational Pe...
PPTX
OOP with Java - Java Introduction (Basics)
PPTX
CH1 Production IntroductoryConcepts.pptx
PDF
Evaluating the Democratization of the Turkish Armed Forces from a Normative P...
PDF
composite construction of structures.pdf
573137875-Attendance-Management-System-original
Project quality management in manufacturing
III.4.1.2_The_Space_Environment.p pdffdf
Geodesy 1.pptx...............................................
Sustainable Sites - Green Building Construction
FINAL REVIEW FOR COPD DIANOSIS FOR PULMONARY DISEASE.pptx
Engineering Ethics, Safety and Environment [Autosaved] (1).pptx
Human-AI Collaboration: Balancing Agentic AI and Autonomy in Hybrid Systems
MET 305 2019 SCHEME MODULE 2 COMPLETE.pptx
CARTOGRAPHY AND GEOINFORMATION VISUALIZATION chapter1 NPTE (2).pptx
Fundamentals of safety and accident prevention -final (1).pptx
TFEC-4-2020-Design-Guide-for-Timber-Roof-Trusses.pdf
Foundation to blockchain - A guide to Blockchain Tech
Mohammad Mahdi Farshadian CV - Prospective PhD Student 2026
UNIT 4 Total Quality Management .pptx
Mitigating Risks through Effective Management for Enhancing Organizational Pe...
OOP with Java - Java Introduction (Basics)
CH1 Production IntroductoryConcepts.pptx
Evaluating the Democratization of the Turkish Armed Forces from a Normative P...
composite construction of structures.pdf

Radio active particle tracking implemnetation

  • 1. Radioactive Particle Tracking (RPT) Gas Liquid Gas Detector In RPT, the motion of a tracer particle designed to be the marker of the phase whose velocity is to be mapped, is tracked The tracer particle is normally a gamma ray emitter The particle is made neutrally buoyant for tracking liquid phase, and for tracking granular solids, the size, shape and density of the tracer particle is matched to that of the granular material  An array of detector is placed around the vessel to record the photon counts  The first level processing yields the Lagrangian position time series of the tracer particle  Secondary processing leads to Eulerian mean velocities, moments of velocity fluctuations , and other flow quantities
  • 2. Photon counts time series Lagrangian position time series Lagrangian velocity time series Eulerian grid Eulerian velocity i , j , k i , j + 1 , k r, θ i, j, k i, j, k+1 i, j, k+2 r, z -0.15 -0.1 -0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 r/R [-] z=25 cm z=15 cm z=7.5 cm Mean Axial Velocity of Solid [m/s]
  • 3. Steps in RPT RPT Calibration Photon counting and data collection Reconstruction Experimental (direct measurement at all possible position in the column) Monte Carlo based (numerical) Velocity reconstruction (time differentiation of two successive position) Post processing of instantaneous fluctuations (Hardware) (Hardware) (Software) (Software)
  • 4. Flow chart of Radioactive Particle Tracking (RPT) (Limtrakul et al. (2005)) RPT Experiments (counts from detector) Instantaneous Position of the Particle Instantaneous velocity (time differentiation of two successive position) Ensemble Average Velocity Fluctuating Velocity Reynolds stress Reconstruction Algorithm Calibration (Distance count map) Root Mean Square Velocity Kinetic Energy i , j , k i , j , k + 1 r, θ r, z i, j, k i, j, k+1 i, j, k+2 Eulerian grid 1 2 3 .... N q v v v v v N    
  • 5. Quantities Calculated from RPT Experimental data Instantaneous Velocity Ensemble average velocity Fluctuating velocity component RMS velocity Stress Fluctuating kinetic energy per unit volume z z v t    ( , , ) , 1 1 ( , , ) ( , , ) ( , , ) N i j k q q n n v i j k v i j k N i j k     ' ( , , ) ( , , ) ( , , ) q q q v i j k v i j k v i j k     '2 RMS q q v v      ' ' ( , , ) ( , , ) qs p q s v i j k v i j k      '2 '2 '2 1 [ ] 2 p r z KE v v v           
  • 6. Hardware Needed to Perform RPT Experiment • Radioactive Source (gamma ray source) • Scintillation Detector (used for photon collection) • Multi Input Data Acquisition System (MIDAS) (used for photon acquisition ) • Data Acquisition Machine (PC) (used for storage of data)
  • 8. Number of Photons in given energy bin Counted Photon Energy Photopeak Flow Chart of Data Acquisition System γ ray Photo Multiplier Tube Pre amplifier High Voltage Amplifier Single Channel Analyzer To Data Acquisition Detector Crystal (NaI (Tl)) Multi Input Data Acquisition System (MIDAS)
  • 11. 0 400 800 1200 1600 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Counts Distance from Detector Centre(mm) Detector 12 Distance Count Map from ‘in-situ’ Experimental Calibration
  • 12. Photon Detection Tracer particle releases photons at solid angle of 4π. Only a small fraction of released photons are incident on the detector crystal. If the photon is capable of penetrating through the detector, it does not contribute to counts. Photons that are absorbed by the detector crystal are considered as a counts. Photon fronts Detector
  • 13. L ρ α  min  cri m ax X Z ρ X ma x  mi n Solid Angle Subtended by the Tracer Particle at the detector for Different Particle Locations When tracer particle is placed out side the detector disk When tracer particle is placed within the detector disk
  • 15.  L L  h   L L h  h L  h L L Top entrance bottom exit Top entrance lateral exit Lateral entrance, bottom exit Lateral entrance lateral exit Possible Cases By Which Photon Can Travel In Detector
  • 16.                      d d l r n r D N j j j abs    exp 1 exp . 1 3         abs abs A A T C   1 Photon Count Rate: Absolute Efficiency of Detector: Monte Carlo Simulation
  • 18. 0 200 400 600 800 1000 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Distance from Detector Axis, cm Photon Counts Effective field of view Area Spread Response Function (ASRF) from Monte Carlo Program
  • 19. RPT Performance Parameters Roy, Larachi, Al-Dahhan and Dudukovic (2002), Appl. Radiat. & Isotopes, 56, 485-503. r C C Sr    1 Sensitivity: C r c r     Resolution: - measure of ability of detector(s) to record a change in tracer particle location - measure of uncertainty in locating tracer particle Wish: - highest sensitivity, i.e., high S - highest resolution, i.e., low s        N i i T z y x z y x 1 2 2 , , 1 , , 1          N i i T z y x S z y x S 1 2 2 , , , , For a combination of detectors:
  • 20. Effect of Number of Detectors in Same Plane Increase in Resolution ~ No Improvement in Resolution Increase in Sensitivity Resolution Sensitivity mm mm-1
  • 21. Effect of Multiple Detectors at Different Axis Number of detector used = 6 1 3 5 2 4 6 Front View 140 mm 140 mm 3 1, 5 2,6 4 Top View Detectors Resolution Sensitivity mm mm-1
  • 22. Steps in RPT RPT Calibration Photon counting and data collection Reconstruction Experimental (direct measurement at all possible position in the column) Monte Carlo based (numerical) Velocity reconstruction (time differentiation of two successive position) Post processing of instantaneous fluctuations (Hardware) (Hardware) (Software) (Software)
  • 23. Reported Position Reconstruction Algorithms • Weighted least squares algorithm • Monte Carlo algorithm • Neural network based reconstruction • Cross correlation algorithm
  • 24. Weighted Least Square Method • In this method a distance count map is created by placing the particle at different known locations. • This step is called ‘calibration’. Distance Count Map 0 200 400 600 800 1000 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Distance from Detector Axis, cm Photon Counts
  • 25. • Then the counts recorded during calibration is fitted in a polynomial equation and distance from each detector is calculated. Where ri is the distance of tracer particle from the ith detector Ii is the intensity recorded at the ith detector. and a0, a1, a2 are constants. 2 1 2 1 1 ..... i oi i i i i r a a a I I                 • ri and Ii is calculated form distance count map. Like, for detector 9 at 10 cm distance, 1200 counts is recorded on detector.
  • 26. • Then actual RPT experiment is performed. • Now the co-ordinate of tracer particle is calculated by estimating by least squares method: 1 1 1 | | (| | | | | |) | | | | | | T T b X W X X W Z     Where: b= co-ordinate of the tracer particle. Z= experimentally measured distance. X= hardware constant depend upon the co-ordinates of the centre of the detector. W= Weighting function 2 1 1 2 1 0 | | 1 0 N W                               Z, X and W can be represented as:
  • 27. m i i r   1 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 | | 1 2 2 2 N N N x y z x y z X x y z                               2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 ( ) ( ) | | ( ) ( ) N N N N r x y z r x y z Z r x y z                                  Where- xi, yi, zi are the co-ordinates of the ith detector.
  • 28.                      d d l r n r D N j j j abs    exp 1 exp . 1 3         abs abs A A T C   1 Photon Count Rate: Absolute Efficiency of Detector: Monte Carlo Simulation
  • 29. Fine Grids Coarse Grid Iterative Grid Refinement Estimate the neighborhood in an iterative manner matching the “predicted” counts and the measured counts…
  • 30. 2D Reconstruction with Monte Carlo Algorithm -- Reconstructed points -- actual points
  • 31. 3D Reconstruction with Monte Carlo Algorithm Actual results Reconstructed result
  • 32. 0 100 200 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 x (mm) z (mm) 0 100 200 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 x (mm) z (mm) 0 100 200 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 x (mm) z (mm) 0 100 200 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 x (mm0 z (mm) Reconstruction of Particle Trajectories 0-6 sec 0-12 sec 0-18 sec 0-30 sec
  • 33. -150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Vz (mm/s) Time (s) -150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Vy (mm/s) Time (s) -150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Vy (mm/s) Time (s) Instantaneous Velocity
  • 34. Total occurrences in the cell (nr=4) = 1238 -50 -25 0 25 50 0 50 100 150 -50 -25 0 25 50 0 50 100 150 Axial Velocity (cm/s) Azimuthal Velocity (cm/s) Radial Velocity (cm/s) -50 -25 0 25 50 0 50 100 150 Frequency Frequenc y Frequenc y Middle (r=3.29 cm) Total occurrences in the cell (nr=1) = 1104 -50 -25 0 25 50 0 50 100 150 Radial Velocity (cm/s) -50 -25 0 25 50 0 50 100 150 Azimuthal Velocity (cm/s) -50 -25 0 25 50 0 50 100 150 Axial Velocity (cm/s) Frequency Frequency Frequency Axis (r=0.047 cm) -50 -25 0 25 50 0 50 100 150 Total occurrences in the cell (nr=7) = 1333 -50 -25 0 25 50 0 50 100 150 Azimuthal Velocity (cm/s) -50 -25 0 25 50 0 50 100 150 Frequency Axial Velocity (cm/s) Frequenc y Frequenc y Wall (r=6.13 cm) Instantaneous Velocity
  • 35. Quantities Calculated from RPT Experimental data Instantaneous Velocity Ensemble average velocity Fluctuating velocity component RMS velocity Stress Fluctuating kinetic energy per unit volume z z v t    ( , , ) , 1 1 ( , , ) ( , , ) ( , , ) N i j k q q n n v i j k v i j k N i j k     ' ( , , ) ( , , ) ( , , ) q q q v i j k v i j k v i j k     '2 RMS q q v v      ' ' ( , , ) ( , , ) qs p q s v i j k v i j k      '2 '2 '2 1 [ ] 2 p r z KE v v v            Photon counts time series Lagrangian position time series Lagrangian velocity time series Eulerian grid Eulerian velocity i , j , k i , j + 1 , k r, θ i, j, k i, j, k+1 i, j, k+2 r, z -0.15 -0.1 -0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 r/R [-] z=25 cm z=15 cm z=7.5 cm Mean Axial Velocity of Solid [m/s]
  • 36. Solids Mean Velocity i , j , k i , j + 1 , k r, θ i, j, k i, j, k+1 i, j, k+2 r, z -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 r/R [-] z/H = 0.06 z/H = 0.19 z/H = 0.46 Ug = 1.12 m/s Mean Axial Velocity of Glass [cm/s] -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 r/R [-] z/H=0.1 z/H=0.3 z/H=0.5 Mean Radial Velocity of glass[cm/s] Ug= 1.12 m/s