REAL-TIME MODE HOPPING OF BLOCK CIPHER ALGORITHMS FOR MOBILE STREAMING

International Journal of Wireless & Mobile Networks (IJWMN) Vol. 5, No. 2, April 2013
DOI : 10.5121/ijwmn.2013.5210 127
REAL-TIME MODE HOPPING OF BLOCK CIPHER
ALGORITHMS FOR MOBILE STREAMING
Kuo-Tsang Huang1
, Yi-Nan Lin2
and Jung-Hui Chiu1
1
Department of Electrical Engineering, Chang Gung University, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan
2
Department of Electronic Engineering, Ming Chi University of Technology, New
Taipei City, Taiwan
d9221006@gmail.com, jnlin@mail.mcut.edu.tw, jhchiu@mail.cgu.edu.tw
ABSTRACT
It has been shown that the encrypted information or ciphertext produced by symmetric-key block ciphers
with Electronic codebook mode is vulnerable to ciphertext searching, replay, insertion and deletion
because it encrypts each block independently. To compensate for this, each block of the encrypted
information should be encrypted dependently. The encrypted information should be operated with a
special mode. The operation mode should be changed. This paper analysis what an operational mode of
block ciphers needs to feedback exactly and proposes a simple real-time changing operation mode
technique that extends the existing mode changing opportunity. The new change operation mode
technique considers the sign differences between the intra-feedback information and the public-feedback
information, and then adaptively determines the corresponding change operation mode factor for each
data block. This mode hopping technique for mobile streaming security is highly suitable for recent block
computing in future various environments.
KEYWORDS
Mobile, Stream, Block Cipher, Mode of Operation, Feedback, Hopping
1. INTRODUCTION
Habits of personal records in the past were drawing and making perfect life memory in order to
cross over the distance of time or space. Personal records of life memory can sample and collect
to retain constantly and be treasured in future moment taste. The intersection of social
community and personal information sharing development of stress instantaneity and emphasis
on real-time acknowledge, e.g. a GOOD respond. Digital camera surrounding analogy affairs
complete digital record, via the mobile communication networks across space restrictions
immediately to share personal things with specific groups or the general public.
Security has become an important issue on embedded systems due to the popularity. The typical
security requirements across a wide range of embedded systems are user identification, secure
network access, secure communications, secure storages, content security and availability.
Modern applied cryptography in the communications networks demands high processing rate to
fully utilize the available network bandwidth.
Block encryption may be vulnerable to ciphertext searching, replay, insertion, and deletion
because it encrypts each block independently. Unfortunately, the non-feedback conventional
block ciphers have plaintext-ciphertext pair problem with the disadvantage of limit block region
scramble. A disadvantage of this method is that identical plaintext blocks are encrypted into
identical ciphertext blocks. Non-feedback Conventional block ciphers do not hide data patterns
well. A striking example of the degree to which non-feedback electronic codebook (ECB) mode
can leave plaintext data patterns in the ciphertext can be seen when the electronic codebook

128
mode is used to encrypt a bitmap image which uses large areas of uniform colour. Block cipher
modes of encryption beside the electronic codebook mode have been suggested to remedy these
drawbacks.
Figure 1. Everywhere Smart Equipments such as iDevice [1]
Modes of operation are the procedure of enabling the repeated use of a block cipher under a
single key. Block cipher modes of encryption beside Electronic codebook (ECB) have been
suggested to remedy these drawbacks. In Internet, modern protocols support several operation
modes and ciphers to provide the varied choice for suitable various operated environments. For
example Secure Socket Layer (SSL) [2] and Internet Protocol Security (IPSec) [3] support
multi-cipher and multi-mode [4][5][6][7][8].
The standard modes of operation described in the literature [9][10] provide confidentiality. How
to choose an appropriate operation mode? The different mode has the different characters. For
example, both of CFB and OFB can be design operating without padding with bit-based size
keystream output; both of CBC and CFB can self sync to avoid channel noise error propagation;
and both of CFB and OFB encryption and decryption applications need an encryption module
only to reach both usages. In addition, only the forward cipher function of the block cipher
algorithm is used in both encryption and decryption operations, without the need for the inverse
cipher function. However, one disadvantage still exists with these techniques when they are
applied to practice encryption: any changing mode in encrypting session and between
encrypting blocks requires the re-configuration of crypto module and has no mechanism
guaranteeing a smooth transition in such encrypting single session.
Our idea of the improvement security of mobile streaming is making mode of operation hopping
like frequency copping in communication. In this paper, a new technique, called feedback
exactly technique, is proposed. The technique uses possible options to satisfy any next one of all
feedbacks so that can real-time change from any one mode to another, even during the same
session. The rest of this paper is organized as follows. Section 2 contains acknowledge of block
cipher, multi-mode crypto ASIC, and mobile streaming protections. Section 3 describes an
application which applies to dynamically exchange mode of operation. Hopping mode of
operation improves mobile streaming security in communication. The idea is based on the
proposed technique of feedback exactly as what an operational mode of block ciphers needs,

129
described in the Section 4. Section 5 contains designs of the smooth changing process and
seamless changeable system architecture of crypto module. Finally Section 6 is the conclusions.
2. RELATED WORKS
Symmetric-key ciphers use trivially related cryptographic secret keys for both encryption of
plaintext and decryption of ciphertext. The secret encryption key is trivially related to the secret
decryption key, in that they may be identical or there is a simple transformation to go between
the two secret keys. In practice, the secret keys represent a shared secret between two or more
parties that can be used to maintain a private information link.
Figure 2. Flow Diagram of Encryption and Decryption for Block Cipher

130
2.1. Block Ciphers and Padding
The major concept in information security today is to continue to improve encryption
algorithms. There are two major types of encryption algorithms for cryptography: symmetric-
key algorithms and public-key algorithms. Symmetric-key algorithms also referred to as
conventional encryption algorithms or single-key encryption algorithms are a class of
algorithms that use the same cryptographic keys for both encryption of plaintext and decryption
of ciphertext. It remains by far the most widely used of the two types of encryption algorithms.
Symmetric-key encryption algorithms can use either stream ciphers or block ciphers. Block
ciphers take a number of bits and encrypt them as a single unit, padding the plaintext so that it is
a multiple of the block size. Blocks of 64 bits have been commonly used. The Advanced
Encryption Standard (AES) algorithm [14] approved by NIST in December 2001 uses 128-bit
blocks. In the normal separation of encryption and decryption, the author separate encryption
and decryption processing when receives messages from input port dependent on the target task.
A block cipher works on units of a fixed block size but messages come in a variety of lengths.
So that the final block be padded before encryption. Several padding schemes exist. The
simplest is to add null bytes to the plaintext to bring its length up to a multiple of the block size,
but care must be taken that the original length of the plaintext can be recovered; this is so, for
example, if the plaintext is a C style string which contains no null bytes except at the end.
Figure 2 is the flow diagram of encryption and decryption for block cipher with padding when
last block is not full of bit.
2.2. Mobile Streaming Protections
Business practices of digital content distribution network are most of the structure of Digital
Rights Management (DRM) protected [20]. DRM mechanism can protect digital contents
against unauthorized user access. From the aspect of the video streaming contents, the
encryption mechanism is the protective skill mainly; meanwhile, the encryption methods vary
due to the form of video streaming contents. Users receive encrypted digital content through
various licensing relationships, which called Rights Object (RO), to distinguish different access
control rights. Encryption mechanisms in addition to confidentiality protection in the
transmission process, if any change in information will cause decryption failed and, therefore,
be able to tell whether a message has been tampered with. Encryption and decryption for
protection of information simplify key management issues.
Figure 3. Digital Rights Management Architecture of Open Mobile Alliance [20]

131
Multimedia security is often used software encryption to ensure the safety of the computing
complexity and provide the security requirements of confidentiality. However, the actual use of
the classic block cipher (such as AES [14]) to encrypt the entire video stream requires a lot of
computing time, and many multimedia applications (such as TV broadcast) require only a low
level of security. People need to develop specifically for this Fast encryption target environment.
Transmission of multimedia services with security, such as: secure transmission of visual
applications (video clients, video conferencing and other mobile devices ...), variant clients may
experience, or low-power devices in the sending or receiving end, such as mobile devices or
handheld devices, will encounter problems plagued low-cost devices of receivers [21]. In
today's practice, there are two possible solutions: one is a low computational complexity of
encryption and decryption algorithms to replace [22], but this will reduce the privacy concerns;
the other one is the selective encryption [23][24], encryption is only part of that section of the
data, hope to achieve while maintaining safety results. Selective encryption seems to be only
part of the contents to ensure the confidentiality, explicitly part of the contents dispersed in the
environment. But fortunately the characteristics of video streaming viewing audience must have
a smooth flow of quality assurance, an intermittent stream video multimedia content, is contrary
to users feeling pain. However, some choose to encrypt which target parts? Alattar etc. [24]
proposed a multimedia digital content encryption algorithm for low energy and computing
powers handheld devices. For security analysis, they proposed two ciphertext attacks discussed
and introduced the technology environment and conditions apply. In the field of multimedia
security, encryption for the entire video stream using classical ciphers (such as AES [14])
requires a lot of computing time. The selective encryption algorithms for part of the contents
accelerate the existing computing programs. These methods do not provide maximum security
but only in the computational complexity of security and balance.
3. THE IMPROVEMENT OF MOBILE STREAMING SECURITY
Cipher modes of operation extend the limit region and scrambling to the post-plaintext message.
The formulas of five conventional modes, non-feedback electronic codebook (ECB) mode,
cipher block chaining (CBC) mode, output feedback (OFB) mode, cipher feedback (CFB) mode,
Counter (CTR) mode, of block cipher for confidentiality could be expressed with the following
notations and ciphering Table 1.
Notations:
Ek( ) the Encryption algorithm of the block cipher with session key K
Dk( ) the Decryption algorithm of the block cipher with session key K
Pi the i-th block of Plaintext with respect to the operation mode
Ci the i-th block of Ciphertext with respect to the operation mode
Yi the i-th output State (or keyStream) of the mode like OFB
CTRi the i-th CounTeR value for the CTR mode of the block cipher
IV the Initial Value needed for the different operation mode

132
Table 1. (a) Enciphering for the Conventional Block Cipher Mode of Operation
mode of operation ciphertext formula extra input
ECB Ci = Ek(Pi) (not necessary)
CBC Ci = Ek(Pi ⊕ Ci-1) C i-1 with C 0=IV1
CFB Ci = Pi ⊕ Ek (Ci-1) C i-1 with C 0=IV1
OFB Ci = Pi ⊕ Ek (Yi-1) Y i-1 with Y 0=IV2
CTR Ci = Pi ⊕ Ek (CTRi-1) CTR i with CTR 0=IV3
with C 0=IV1, Y 0=IV2, CTR 0=IV3, and CTR i= IV3+i
Table 1. (b) Deciphering for the Conventional Block Cipher Mode of Operation
mode of operation plaintext formula extra input
ECB Pi = Dk(Ci) (not necessary)
CBC Pi = Dk(Ci) ⊕ Ci-1 C i-1 with C0=IV1
CFB Pi = Ci ⊕ Ek (Ci-1) C i-1 with C0=IV1
OFB Pi = Ci ⊕ Ek (Yi-1) Y i-1 with Y0=IV2
CTR Pi = Ci ⊕ Ek (CTRi-1) CTR i with CTR0=IV3
with C0=IV1, Y0=IV2, CTR0=IV3, and CTR i= IV3+i
(a) Encryption (b) Decryption
Figure 4. Conventional Block Ciphering

133
The block diagrams of the enciphering and deciphering formulas are shown in Figures 5(a)－(e).
(a) Block diagrams of ECB mode (b) Block diagrams of CBC mode
(c) Block diagrams of CFB mode (d) Block diagrams of OFB mode
(e) Block diagrams of CTR mode
Figure 5. Block Diagrams of Different Ciphering Modes
3.1 Problem Descriptions
According the above expressions, except the ECB mode, encipher needs the regular input of
plaintext Pi and the extra input (Ci-1, Yi-1, or CTRi-1) to perform the ciphering formula to find the
output ciphertext Ci. The extra input is not the same for all the modes of operation. This
situation will make it not suitable for changing the mode of operation during the ciphering
process. In other words, the direct change immediately from one mode to another in a session is
impossible. For instance, if the current mode is ECB, it can’t change to the OFB mode, because
that it does not have the extra input Yi-1 which is necessary for the OFB mode to perform
correctly.

134
Based on the conventional ciphertext/plaintext formula, it could be configured to one of the five
modes of operation, and performs the ciphering task during the entire session with this fixed
mode. After that, it could be reconfigured to another mode of operation for the requirement of
the subsequent job. In this section, the author introduce encrypting bursts with different ciphers
or different operation modes. One example of the problem is shown in following.
3.2 An Example of Internal Data Feedback Problem
If users want to dynamically change between blocks in a session of encrypt tasks, they must
prepare all the feedbacks to suit one of the next block needed. For example, a user must prepare
the current ciphertext data block feedbacks, if next block would operate the CBC mode. In
current block slot, prepare several possible options for the next block operation needed is a
direct solution and can solve the most of feedback problems, but not the special case of internal
data feedback problem. Feedback problems include one of the special case the author called
internal data feedback problem. The most famous existing example is output feedback problem
(i.e., a previous slot block data feedback to the same one single cipher module circularly). The
index i is timing slot index in Figure 6. The slot unit of data is block length size.
Ci=EK[Pi⊕Ci-1] Ci+1=EK[Yi]⊕Pi+1
(a) In encrypting, mode of block operation changing from CBC to OFB

135
Pi=DK[Ci]⊕Ci-1 Pi+1=EK[Yi ]⊕Ci+1, but where Yi is ?!
(b) In decrypting, mode of block operation changing from CBC to OFB
Figure 6. An Example of Internal Data Feedback Problem
4. FEEDBACK EXACTLY AS WHAT AN OPERATIONAL MODE OF BLOCK
CIPHERS NEEDS
Modern block cipher protocols support five modes of operation, ECB, CBC, OFB, CFB, CTR,
to provide the confidentiality for the requirements of different applications. Since each mode
has its special plaintext/ciphertext formula with different extra input, it could not change the
mode of operation anywhere at any time.
By inspecting formulas and extra inputs in Table 1 and block diagrams in Figure 5, it could be
found out that ECB, CBC, and CFB modes have lack of stream variable Si. The assignment of
the stream variable Si for ECB, CBC, and CFB modes is necessary. To solve the above
inconsistent extra input problem, the union the extra inputs of different modes of operation is set
to be the new extra inputs, and be redefined as the previous status <Pi-1, Ci-1, Yi-1>. The status is
defined as the 3-tuples vector of the form <plaintext Pi, ciphertext Ci, and internal state Yi> =
<Pi, Ci, Yi>. After finishing the ciphering operation, the previous status <Pi-1, Ci-1, Yi-1> is
updated and replaced the current status <Pi, Ci, Yi>. In this sense, the conventional enciphering
formula could be considered as the ciphertext updating formula, and the conventional
deciphering formula could be considered as the plaintext updating formula. In order to complete
the updating procedure, the update of the internal feedback exactly state Si is introduced here
for the different modes of operation. The internal feedback exactly state Si could be found by
the general function gmc( ) of the mode of operation specified by the mode code mc.
Si= gmc(k, Pi-1, Ci-1, Yi-1, CTRi-1) …(1)

136
For the ECB or CBC mode, it does not have the internal feedback exactly state Si in the
conventional form. Hence, the internal feedback exactly state Si should be defined as to be any
variable got from the ECB structure, such as the ciphertext, or that of the next-to-last round. For
simplicity, let Si = Si-1.
For the CFB, OFB and CTR modes, they are the stream cipher like. The internal feedback
exactly state Si could be defined as to be the keystream variable. Hence, the ciphertext would be
expressed as Ci = Pi ⊕ Si, and the internal feedback exactly state Si could be expressed as Si =
Ek (Ci-1), Si = Ek (Si-1), Si = Ek (CTRi-1) for CFB, OFB, CTR, respectively.
Any assignment of Si for ECB, CBC, and CFB modes could be workable as long as Si are kept
the same at encipher and decipher. For simplicity, the assignments of Si would be Si = Si-1 for
ECB and CBC modes, and Si= Ek(Ci-1) for CFB mode, as shown in Table 2.
Enciphering:
fmc( ) is the enciphering function of the mode of operation specified by the mode code mc.
Ci= fmc(k, Pi, Pi-1, Ci-1, Si-1) …(2)
Table 2. (a) Enciphering for mode hopping of the improved block cipher mode of operation
operation mode mode code mc enciphering formula
(status updating formula)
previous status
ECB 000 Ci = Ek(Pi), Si = Si-1 P i-1, C i-1, S i-1
CBC 001 Ci = Ek(Pi ⊕ Ci-1), Si = Si-1 P i-1, C i-1, S i-1
CFB 010 Ci = Pi ⊕ Si, Si = Ek (Ci-1) P i-1, C i-1, S i-1
OFB 011 Ci = Pi ⊕ Si, Si = Ek (Si-1) P i-1, C i-1, S i-1
CTR 100 Ci = Pi ⊕ Si, Si = Ek (CTRi-1) P i-1, C i-1, S i-1
with C 0=IV1, S 0=IV2, CTR 0=IV3, and CTR i= IV3+i
Deciphering :
fmc
-1
( ) is the deciphering function of mode mc, and is the inverse function of fmc( ).
P i = fmc
-1
(k, C i, P i-1, C i-1, S i-1) …(3)
Table 2. (b) Deciphering for mode hopping of the improved block cipher mode of operation
operation mode mode code mc deciphering formula
(status updating formula)
previous status
ECB 000 Pi = Dk(Ci), Si = Si-1 P i-1, C i-1, S i-1
CBC 001 Pi = Dk(Ci) ⊕ Ci-1, Si = Si-1 P i-1, C i-1, S i-1
CFB 010 Pi = Ci ⊕ Si, Si = Ek (Ci-1) P i-1, C i-1, S i-1
OFB 011 Pi = Ci ⊕ Si, Si = Ek (Si-1) P i-1, C i-1, S i-1
CTR 100 Pi = Ci ⊕ Si, Si = Ek (CTRi-1) P i-1, C i-1, S i-1
with C 0=IV1, S 0=IV2, CTR 0=IV3, and CTR i= IV3+i
The block diagrams of the improved enciphering and deciphering formulas are shown in Figures.
7(a)－(e).

137
(a) Improved block diagrams of ECB mode (b) Improved block diagrams of CBC mode
(c) Improved block diagrams of CFB mode. (d) Improved block diagrams of OFB mode.
(e) Improved block diagrams of CTR mode.
Figure 7. Improved Block Diagrams of Different Ciphering Modes
5. APPLY TO REAL-TIME CHANGING OPERATIONAL MODE
Some symmetric ciphers use the same function to perform encryption and decryption
applications, some does not. Because of some modes decrypt message using the same algorithm
as encrypting, i.e. CFB and OFB. The author defines three levels about module, function, and
application to distinguish different usage situations. A crypto cipher module has two functions,
an encryption function and a decryption function. E-application is a practical one in message
encryption, and D-application is a practical one in message decryption. E-function is a mapping
function of transforming information (referred to as plaintext) to make it unreadable to anyone
except those possessing special knowledge, usually referred to as a key. D-function is the
inverse one of E-function. Table 3 indicates the notations what the author need.
When this simple real-time changing operational mode technique is used for message
encryption, the mode change depends on a control sequence. The target sequence is
synchronous between encryption and decryption parts and it is pre-shared as a secret. One can
generate many different control sequence configuration files at design time for peers which can
have a great diversity to change the modules. Before a session of communication begins, the
communication parties need to negotiate a control sequence configuration file introduced by
adaptive secure protocols such as IPSec. However, the additional cost of a target control
sequence can be flexibly reduced according to the practical requirements of security.

138
If user wants guarantee real-time changing mode of crypto operations, a technique must allow
keep one step ahead. The author use AES (Daemen et al, 2002) to illustrate exchange
procedures. A secret key K with a 128 bit length is required for the encryption and decryption
(denoted by EK and DK respectively) of AES (Daemen et al, 2002). Suppose the author want to
encrypt a long message sequence, PT
. First, the author divide the sequence into several blocks,
Pi, i=1,2..., each Pi with 128 bit length. Then, the encryption operations are performed by Figure
8(a) and the decryption operations are performed by Figure 8(b). Where Si , for i=1,2..., is a 128
bit sequence.
Both enciphering and deciphering algorithms are needed implemented within the deciphering
improved structure, but only one of them is used for each mode of operation. To save the
consuming power, in the deciphering improved structure, the enciphering box is disabled for
ECB, CBC modes and enabled for CFB, OFB, CTR modes; and similarly, the deciphering box
is enabled for ECB, CBC modes and disabled for CFB, OFB, CTR modes. The author can get
that it is flexible, workable, and applicable in modern communication applications.
Table 3. Notations
B A crypto module of any one symmetric cipher which can perform both the
encryption and decryption applications. This module has two functions, an
encryption function and a decryption function.
Bi Use B in an encryption application (E-application) at a i’th block slot,
i=1,2,…, to encrypt a long message sequence.
Bi
-1
Use B in a decryption application (D-application) at a i’th block slot,
i=1,2,…, to decrypt a long message sequence.
PT
A message sequence of all the plaintext block data.
CT
A message sequence of all the ciphertext block data.
Pi An i’th block data in a session of task.
Pi=D-application[Ci]=B-1
[Ci]
Ci An i’th block data in a session of task.
Ci=E-application[Pi]=B[Pi]
Si An i’th output State (or keyStream) of the mode.
Ci=Bi[Pi,Pi-1,Ci-1,Yi-1] Ci+1=Bi[Pi+1,Pi,Ci,Yi]
(a) The encryption operations

139
Bi
-1 Si
Ci
Pi
Bi+1
-1 Si+1
Ci+1
Pi+1
Si-1
Ci-1
Pi-1
Pi=Bi
-1
[Ci,Ci-1,Pi-1,Yi-1] Pi+1=Bi
-1
[Ci+1,Ci,Pi,Yi]
(b) The decryption operations
Figure 8. Real-time Changing Operational Mode
(a) Crypto module Bi

140
(b) Crypto module Bi
-1
Figure 9. System Architecture of Proposed Crypto Module
6. CONCLUSIONS
The design of a real-time hopping mode of operation is proposed in this paper. In this
manuscript, the author proposes a seamless changing technique for block ciphers. The changing
technique facilitates the smooth implementation of proposed system architecture of dynamic
changeable and low-resource hardware, which is appropriate for mobile devices such as a
smartphone. According to most of the content in mobile communication are products from
social applications or multimedia applications. In the future, people share their own video
programs frequently. The author provide a common solution for multi-mode, which is highly
suitable for recent block cipher computing using several resources in future various
environments, especially a large amount data such as video streaming.
REFERENCES
[1] iDevice. http://programming4.us/multimedia/4782.aspx
[2] SSL 3.0 Specification. http://wp.netscape.com/eng/ssl3/
[3] IPSec Working Group. http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/ipseccharter.html

141
[4] Block cipher modes of operation.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Block_cipher_modes_of_operation
[5] S. Guilley, P. Hoogvorst, and R. Pacalet, (2007) “A Fast Pipelined Multi-Mode DES
Architecture Operating in IP Representation,” The VLSI Journal, Vol. 40, No. 4, pp.479-489.
[6] L. Luo, Z.G. Qin, and J. Wang, (2009) “The Intelligent Conversion for Different Layers’ Block
Ciphers,” ICIC Express Letters, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp.73–77.
[7] C.P. Young, C.C. Chia, Y.B. Lin, and L.B. Chen, (2011) “Fast multi-cipher transformation and
its implementation for modern secure protocols,” IJICIC, Vol. 7, No. 8, pp.4941–4954.
[8] K.T. Huang, J.H. Chiu, and S.S. Shen, (2013) “A Novel Structure with Dynamic Operation
Mode for Symmetric-Key Block Ciphers,” International Journal of Network Security & Its
Applications, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp.17-36.
[9] National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), NIST. gov - Computer Security
Division - Computer Security Resource Center, “Recommendation of block cipher security
methods and Techniques,” NIST SP800-38.
[10] International Organization for Standardization (ISO), “Information Technology-Security
Techniques-Modes of Operation for. an n-bit Block Cipher,” ISO/IEC 10116.
[11] William Stallings (2003). Cryptography and Network Security: Principles and Practices 3rd
Edition. Pearson Education. ISBN 0-13-111502-2.
[12] Alfred J. Menezes, Paul C. van Oorschot and Scott A. Vanstone (1996). Handbook of Applied
Cryptography. CRC Press. ISBN 0-8493-8523-7.
[13] G.J. Simmons (1999). Contemporary cryptology: The science of information integrity. Wiley.
ISBN 0-7803-5352-8.
[14] J. Daemen and V. Rijmen (2002). The Design of Rijndael: AES - the advanced encryption
standard. Springer Verlag.
[15] S. Mangard, M. Aigner and S. Dominikus, (2003) “A highly regular and scalable AES hardware
architecture,” IEEE Transaction on Computers, Vol. 52, No. 4, pp. 483–491.
[16] D. Carlson, D. Brasili, A. Hughes, A. Jain, T. Kisezly, P. Kodandapani, A. Vardharajan, T.
Xanthopoulos, and V. Yalala, (2003) “A high performance SSL IPsec protocol security
processor,” Proc. ISSCC’03.
[17] A. Hodjat, P. Schaumont, and I. Verbauwhede, (2004) “Architectural design features of a
programmable high throughput AES coprocessor,” Proc. ITCC’04, pp.498–502.
[18] A. Satoh, S. Morioka, K. Takano, and S. Munetoh, “A compact Rijndael hardware architecture
with S-box optimization,” Proc. ASIACRYPT 2001, Lect Notes Comput Sci 2248, pp.239–254.
[19] P. Saravanan, N. RenukaDevi, G. Swathi, and P. Kalpana, (2011) “A high-throughput ASIC
implementation of configurable AES processor,” IJCA, NSC(3), pp.1–6.
[20] Open Mobile Alliance, Approved Version 2.1, 2008.
[21] K.T. Huang, J. Stu, S.C. Chou, and J.H. Chiu, (2011) “OTP-based hybrid cipher using for
mobile e-Learning,” Proc. 2nd World Congress on Computer Science and Information
Engineering, pp. 127–134.
[22] M. Feldhofer and J. Wolkerstorfer, (2007) “Strong crypto for RFID tags - A comparison of low-
power hardware implementations,” Proc. IEEE ISCAS’07, pp. 1839–1842.
[23] M. Grangetto, A. Grosso, and E. Magli, (2004) “Selective encryption of JPEG 2000 images by
means of randomized arithmetic coding,” Proc. IEEE International Workshop on Multimedia
Signal Processing, pp. 347–350.
[24] A.M. Alattar and G.I. Al-Regib, (1999) “Evaluation of selective encryption techniques for secure
transmission of MPEG video bit-streams,” Proc. IEEE ISCAS'99, pp340–343.

142
[25] L. Qiao and K. Nahrstedt, (1998) “Comparsion of MPEG encryption algorithms,” Computers
and Graphics, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 1–21.
[26] I. Agi and L. Gong, (1996) “ An empirical study of MPEG video transmissions,” Proc. Internet
Society Symposium on Network and Distributed System Security, pp. 137–144.
[27] L. Wu, C. Weaver, and T. Austin, (2001) “CryptoManiac: A Fast Flexible Architecture for
Secure Communication,” Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Comput. Archit., pp. 110–119.
[28] S. Laovs, A. Priftis, P. Kitsos, and O. Koufopavlou, (2003) “Reconfigurable crypto process
design of encryption algorithms operation modes methods and FPGA integration,” Proc. IEEE
Int. Conf. MWSCAS, pp. 811–814.
Authors
Mr. Kuo-Tsang Huang received B.Sc. from Chung Hua University in 2001 and
M.Sc. from Aletheia University in 2003. He is currently studying for the Ph.D.
degree in Department of Electrical Engineering of Chang Gung University, Taiwan.
He is a member of the International Collaboration for Advancing Security
Technology (iCAST). His research interests include wireless network, information
security, cryptography, computer architecture issues and technology.
Dr. Yi-Nan Lin received his B.S. degree from the Electrical Engineering
Department of National Twiwan Institute of Technology in 1989, M.S. degree in
Computer Science & Engineering from the Yuan Ze University in 2000, and Ph.D.
degree in Department of Electrical Engineering of Chang Gung University in 2009.
He joined the Department of Electrical Engineering at Mingchi University of
Technology, Taishan, Taiwan, in 1990. He is now a associate professor in the
Department of Electronic Engineering. His current research interests include error-
control coding, and digital transmission systems.
Dr. Jung-Hui Chiu received B.S.E.E. from Tatung University in 1971, M.S.E.E. in
signal processing and Ph.D. in communication from National Taiwan University in
1973 and 1986 respectively. From 1975 to 1981, he was a research staff with
Chunghwa Telecom Labs where he was involved in the research of fiber
communications and the microwave systems. During 1981–1986, he was an
institutor for the Electronic Department, National Taiwan University of Science and
Technology, and was associate professor from 1986 to 2003. He is currently an
associate professor in the Department of Electrical Engineering of Chang Gung
University, Taiwan. He is a member of IEEE Communications Society, the Chinese
Cryptology and Information Security Association (CCISA), and the International
Collaboration for Advancing Security Technology (iCAST). His research interests
include digital communication systems, wireless communication systems,
information security, RFID, hardware security, smart card, and cryptography.

REAL-TIME MODE HOPPING OF BLOCK CIPHER ALGORITHMS FOR MOBILE STREAMING

More Related Content

What's hot (18)

Viewers also liked (17)

Similar to REAL-TIME MODE HOPPING OF BLOCK CIPHER ALGORITHMS FOR MOBILE STREAMING (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

REAL-TIME MODE HOPPING OF BLOCK CIPHER ALGORITHMS FOR MOBILE STREAMING