Rubric Detail A rubric lists grading criteria that instruct.docx

Rubric Detail
A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate
student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and
made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to
change the rubric's layout.
Content
Name: 12 Week Hybrid Discussion Rubric
Grid ViewList View
Excellent
Satisfactory
Needs Improvement
Initial Post:
Content/Comprehension
Points:
5 (28.57142%)
Points Range:

4 (22.85714%) - 5 (28.57142%)
Post demonstrates
depth of understanding of course content; Addresses discussion
prompt completely; offers clear point of view and detail.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range:

2 (11.42857%) - 3 (17.14285%)
Post demonstrates adequate depth of understanding, but does
not address all of discussion prompt; point of view is somewhat
unclear and detail is limited.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range:

0 (0.00%) - 1 (5.71428%)
Post does not demonstrate depth of understanding of course
content; Discussion prompt is minimally addressed; Point of
view is unclear and detail is under-developed.
Feedback:
Initial Post:
Timeliness
Points:
2 (11.42857%)

Points Range:
2 (11.42857%) - 2 (11.42857%)
Submits initial post by deadline.
Feedback:
Points:

Points Range:
1 (5.71428%) - 1 (5.71428%)
Submits initial post one to three days late.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range:

0 (0.00%) - 0 (0.00%)
Submits initial post after three days.
Feedback:
Initial Post:
Spelling/Grammar/Mechanics
Points:
2 (11.42857%)

Points Range:
2 (11.42857%) - 2 (11.42857%)
Post has 0-1 spelling or grammatical errors; Properly cites
work in APA format where required.
Feedback:
Points:

Points Range:
1 (5.71428%) - 1 (5.71428%)
Post has 2-3 spelling or grammatical errors; Cites work in
APA format where required with few errors.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range:

0 (0.00%) - 0 (0.00%)
Posts have 4 or more spelling or grammatical errors; Does not
cite work where required.
Feedback:
Peer Responses:
Engagement/Classroom
Interaction
Points:
4.25 (24.28571%)

Points Range:
4 (22.85714%) - 4.5 (25.71428%)
Submits required number of response posts; Responses extend
the discussion by making connections, relating to others’ ideas
and adding supporting detail.
Feedback:
Points:

Points Range:
2 (11.42857%) - 3 (17.14285%)
Submits required number of response posts; Some connections
are made with relevant explanation and detail.
Feedback:
Points:

Points Range:
0 (0.00%) - 1 (5.71428%)
Responses are not submitted; Responses are generic, limited,
do not extend the discussion or add detail.
Feedback:
Peer Responses:
Timeliness
Points:

2 (11.42857%)
Points Range:
2 (11.42857%) - 2 (11.42857%)
Submits peer response posts by deadline.
Feedback:
Points:

Points Range:
0 (0.00%) - 0 (0.00%)
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range:

0 (0.00%) - 0 (0.00%)
Submits peer response posts late.
Feedback:
Peer Responses:
Spelling/Grammar/Mechanics
Points:
2 (11.42857%)

Points Range:
2 (11.42857%) - 2 (11.42857%)
Posts have 0-1 spelling or grammatical errors; Properly cites
Feedback:
Points:

Points Range:
1 (5.71428%) - 1 (5.71428%)
Posts have 2-3 spelling or grammatical errors; Cites work in
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range:

0 (0.00%) - 0 (0.00%)
Feedback:
Show Descriptions
Show Feedback
Initial Post:
Content/Comprehension--

Levels of Achievement:
Excellent
4 (22.85714%) - 5 (28.57142%)
Post demonstrates
depth of understanding of course content; Addresses discussion
prompt completely; offers clear point of view and detail.
Satisfactory
2 (11.42857%) - 3 (17.14285%)
Post demonstrates adequate depth of understanding, but does
not address all of discussion prompt; point of view is somewhat
unclear and detail is limited.
Needs Improvement
0 (0.00%) - 1 (5.71428%)
Post does not demonstrate depth of understanding of course
content; Discussion prompt is minimally addressed; Point of

view is unclear and detail is under-developed.
Feedback:
Initial Post:
Timeliness--
Excellent
2 (11.42857%) - 2 (11.42857%)
Submits initial post by deadline.
Satisfactory
1 (5.71428%) - 1 (5.71428%)

Submits initial post one to three days late.
Needs Improvement
0 (0.00%) - 0 (0.00%)
Submits initial post after three days.
Feedback:
Initial Post:
Spelling/Grammar/Mechanics--
Excellent
2 (11.42857%) - 2 (11.42857%)

Post has 0-1 spelling or grammatical errors; Properly cites work
in APA format where required.
Satisfactory
1 (5.71428%) - 1 (5.71428%)
Post has 2-3 spelling or grammatical errors; Cites work in APA
format where required with few errors.
Needs Improvement
0 (0.00%) - 0 (0.00%)
Feedback:

Peer Responses:
Engagement/Classroom
Interaction--
Excellent
4 (22.85714%) - 4.5 (25.71428%)
Submits required number of response posts; Responses extend
the discussion by making connections, relating to others’ ideas
and adding supporting detail.
Satisfactory
2 (11.42857%) - 3 (17.14285%)
Submits required number of response posts; Some connections
are made with relevant explanation and detail.
Needs Improvement
0 (0.00%) - 1 (5.71428%)

Responses are not submitted; Responses are generic, limited, do
not extend the discussion or add detail.
Feedback:
Peer Responses:
Timeliness--
Excellent
2 (11.42857%) - 2 (11.42857%)
Submits peer response posts by deadline.
Satisfactory
0 (0.00%) - 0 (0.00%)

Needs Improvement
0 (0.00%) - 0 (0.00%)
Submits peer response posts late.
Feedback:
Peer Responses:
Spelling/Grammar/Mechanics--
Excellent
2 (11.42857%) - 2 (11.42857%)

Posts have 0-1 spelling or grammatical errors; Properly cites
Satisfactory
1 (5.71428%) - 1 (5.71428%)
Posts have 2-3 spelling or grammatical errors; Cites work in
Needs Improvement
0 (0.00%) - 0 (0.00%)
Feedback:

Raw Total: 17.25 (of 17.5)
Feedback to Learner
Name:12 Week Hybrid Discussion Rubric

Rubric Detail A rubric lists grading criteria that instruct.docx

More Related Content

Similar to Rubric Detail A rubric lists grading criteria that instruct.docx (19)

More from ShiraPrater50 (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Rubric Detail A rubric lists grading criteria that instruct.docx