SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Quality By Design for Packaging
Development
By
Saurav Anand
+91-8511773466
Packaging Development, IIP, MBA
Quality By Design approach of Packaging
Development
Definition
A systematic approach to development that begins with predefined objectives
and emphasizes product and process understanding, as well as process
control, which are based on sound science and quality risk management.
Component
Critical Quality Attributes (CQAs) are physical, chemical, biological or
microbiological properties or characteristics that should be within an
appropriate limit, range, or distribution to ensure the desired product
quality.
Critical Process Parameter (CPP) is a process parameter whose
variability has an impact on the CQA. The CPP should be monitored and
controlled to ensure that the process produces products with desired quality
specifications.
Quality By Design approach of Packaging
Development
Design space is the multidimensional combination and interaction of input
variables (e.g., material attributes) and process parameters that have been
demonstrated to provide assurance of quality. Working within this design
space is not considered a change.
Quality Target Product Profile (QTPP) is a prospective summary of the
quality characteristics of a drug product that ideally will be achieved to
ensure the desired quality. QTPP also takes into account safety and efficacy
of the drug product.
Packaging aspects must be considered during the development of product.
The packaging process parameters may affect the final product quality.
During the development of packaging for products, it is important to
understand the impact of material attributes and process parameters on
CQAs. It is essential to identify and control the sources of variability. It is
also critical to continue to monitor these throughout the lifecycle of the
product.
Fundamentals of Container Closure
System (CCS)
Containers
A containers for Pharmaceutical use is an article which holds or is intended to contain and
protect a drug and is or may be in direct contact with it. The closure is a part of the
container. The container and its closure must not interact physically or chemically with the
substance within in any way that would alter its quality.
USP
Tamper-Evident Packaging
Light-Resistant Container
Well-Closed Container
Tight Container
Hermetic Container
Single-Unit Container
Single-Dose Container
Unit-Dose Containers
Unit-of-Use Containers
Multiple-Unit Containers
Multiple-dose Containers
Fundamentals of Container Closure
System (CCS)
Packaging material
 Any material employed in the packaging of a medicinal products,
excluding any outer packaging used for transportation or shipment.
 Packaging materials are referred to as primary or secondary according
to whether or not they are intended to be in direct contact with the
product.
 Any single part of a container closure system.
Typical components are
Containers , Container liners
Closures, Closure liners
Stopper overseals, Container inner seals
Administration ports
overwraps
Administration accessories
Container labels
Fundamentals of Container Closure
System (CCS)
Primary packaging component
Packaging component that is or may be in direct contact with the dosage
form.
Secondary packaging component
Packaging component that is not and will not be in direct contact with the
dosage form.
Container closure system
The sum of packaging components that together contain and protect the
dosage form.
This includes primary packaging components & secondary packaging
components, if the latter are intended to provide additional protection to
the drug product.
Packaging system is equivalent to a container closure system
Type of Packaging by Route of Administration
Route of
Administration Type of Packaging
Key Selection Criteria – Packaging Films
Choosing the most appropriate pack
 Shelf life enhancement.
 Material options – Barrier & Type ( Halogenated & Non-Halogenated) .
 Comply Quality by Design (QbD)
 Regional regulatory requirements.(e.g. CR/SF features).
 Anti-Counterfeit protection.
 Enable branding.
 Machine-packaging material interface – to improve productivity.
 Cost optimization.
Additional drivers & future challenges:
 Moisture sensitive drugs increasing barrier requirements
 Novel delivery systems
 Emphasis on speed to market
 Control of R&D Expenditure/resource - number of stability studies required
 Global - Regional - Local packs
 Anti-counterfeiting, illegal cross-border trading
 Pharmacogenomics - Personalised medicines
 Demographic change - Ageing population
Quality By Design (QBD) approach for
Packaging Development
Overview
1) Concept development
a) Voice –of the-customer-resulted in established the QTPPs (Quality target product
profile)
b) Establish CQAs (Critical quality attributes)
c) Concept and prototype selections
d) Design of experiment and data analysis
2) Product Development
a) Design verification
b) Validation
c) Stability
d) Real time process controls to ensure quality
f) Risk based change strategy
3) Industrialization
a) Design transfer
b) Market introduction
Quality By Design (QBD) approach for
Packaging Development
1) Concept Development
a) Voice –of the-customer-resulted in established the QTPPs
(Quality target product profile)
b) Establish CQAs (Critical quality attributes)
c) Concept and prototype selections
d) Design of experiment and data analysis
1) Concept development
a) QTPPs (Quality target product profile)
Voice –of the-customer-resulted in established The quality
target product profile(QTPP) relates to quality, safety
and efficacy.
Suitability –
tests and studies and accepted for the initial qualification of
a component or a container closure system for its intend
use.
 Protection
 Safety
 Compatibility
 Performance & Dose delivery.
1) Concept development
a) QTPPs (Quality target product profile)
Examples of Packaging Concerns for Common Classes of Drug
Products
Degree of
Concern
Associated with
the Route of
Administration
Likelihood of Packaging Component-Dosage Form
Interaction
High Medium Low
Highest Inhalation Aerosols & Solutions;
Injection & Injectable
Suspension
Sterile Powders &
Powders for
Injection; Inhalation
Powders
High Ophthalmic Solutions &
Suspension; Transdermal
Ointments & Patches; Nasal
Aerosol & Sprays
Low Topical Solutions &
Suspensions; Topical & Lingual
Aerosols; Oral Solutions &
Suspension
Topical Powders;
Oral Powder
Oral Tablets &
Oral (Hard &
Soft Gelatin)
Capsules
a) QTPPs
(Quality
target product
profile)
Overall general description of the container closure system, plus:
For Each Packaging Component:
Name, product code, manufacturer, physical description
Materials of construction (for each: name, manufacturer, product code)
Description of any additional treatments or preparations
Protection: (By each component and/or the container closure system, as appropriate)
Light exposure , Reactive gases (e.g., oxygen) , Moisture permeation , Solvent loss or leakage
Microbial contamination(sterility/container integrity, increased bioburden, microbial limits)
Filth Other
Safety: (for each material of construction, as appropriate) Chemical composition of all plastics, elastomers,
adhesives, etc.
Extractables, as appropriate for the material Extraction/toxicological evaluation studies, as appropriate Appropriate
USP testing
Appropriate reference to the indirect food additive regulations (21 CFR174-186)
Other studies as appropriate
Compatibility: (for each component and/or the packaging system, as appropriate) Component/dosage form
interaction, USP methods are typically accepted
May also be addressed in post-approval stability studies
Performance: (for the assembled packaging system) Functionality and/or drug delivery, as appropriate
For Each Packaging Component Received by the Applicant:
Applicant's tests and acceptance criteriac
Dimensional (drawing) and performance criteria
Method to monitor consistency in composition, as appropriate
For Each Packaging Component Provided by the Supplier:
Manufacturer's acceptance criteria for release, as appropriate
Brief description of the manufacturing process
Stability - As per ICH Guidelines
1) Concept development
a)QTPPs Quality target product profile)
DescriptionSuitabilityQualityControl
1) Concept development
a) QTPPs Quality target product profile
Route of Administration/
Dosage Form
Suitability
Protection Compatibility Safety Performance/
Drug Delivery
Inhalation Aerosols and Solutions,
Nasal Sprays
L, S, M, W, G Case 1c Case 1s Case 1d
Inhalation Powders L, M, W Case 3c Case 5s Case 1d
Injections, Injectable Suspensions L, S, M, G Case 1c Case 2s Case 2d
Sterile Powders and Powders for
Injection
L, M, W Case 2c Case 2s Case 2d
Ophthalmic Solutions & Suspensions L, S, M, G Case 1c Case 2s Case 2d
Topical Delivery Systems L, S Case 1c Case 3s Case 1d
Topical Solutions & Suspensions, and
Topical and Lingual Aerosols
L, S, M, Case 1c Case 3s Case 2d
Topical Powders L, M, W Case 3c Case 4s Case 3d
Oral Solutions and Suspensions L, S, M Case 1c Case 3s Case 2d
Oral Powders L,W Case 2c Case 3s Case 3d
Oral Tablets and Oral (Hard and Soft
Gelatin)
L, W Case 3c Case 4s Case 3d
1) Concept development
b) Critical quality attributes (CQA)
Quality control
packaging material testing typically used and accepted to established the critical
quality attributes, and performed test give qualification of packaging component and
container closure system continue to passes the characteristics test established under CQA,
it is essential for quality of product.
It can be controlled and studies (QC)- Physical & Chemical characteristic :
Quality Control of Packaging Components
Physical Characteristics
 Dimensional criteria.
 Physical parameters critical to the consistent manufacture of the packaging component
Performance characteristics.
Chemical Characteristics
 May affect the safety, compatibility, functional characteristics or protective properties of a
packaging components.
1) Concept development
b) Parameter to established Critical quality
attributes (CQA)
Dimension study
USP/EP test USP 660, 671,661,381,87 88 , EP 32 etc
ESCR test
Leak test
IR Study
OTR/MVTR Study
DSC test
Spray pattern study
Dose delivery study
Lacquer uniformity study
Sterility test
E/L study
1) Concept development
Interrelationship between QTPP Vs CQA
Attributes
Concerns and Interaction Proposed Methods
Protection
Exposure to light, moisture,
microbial ingress, and oxidation
from presence of oxygen
USP<661>Light Transmission and Water Vapor
Permeation, Container Integrity (Microbial ingress,
Dye Penetration, Helium Leak)
Compatibility
Leachable induced degradation,
absorption or adsorption of drug,
precipitation, changes in pH,
discoloration, brittleness of
packaging materials
Leachability Study (Migration of chemicals into
drug product) using LC/MS, GC/MS, ICP/AA, pH,
appearance of drug and container, Thermal
analysis (DSC, TGA), IR
Safety
No leached harmful or undesirable
amounts of substances to expose
patients treated with drug
Extraction study (USP Physicochemical Tests-
Plastics), USP Elastomeric Closures for Injections,
Toxicological Evaluation, USP Biological
Reactivity and complied with CFR additives and
purity
Performance
Container closure system
fuctionality, drug delivery
Functionality (improved patient compliance or use)
Delivery (transfer dose in right amount or rate)
1) Concept Development
c) Concept and prototype selections
 Study of QTPP and CQA will help to established the concept and
prototype selection of container closure system.
 Concept and prototype selections of container closure system (ccs)
will determine the design space for specific formulation
 At each stage of the development cycle several factors influenced
the progression of new design. Uncertainty is reduced through
statistical analysis.
 Selection and development of container closure system (ccs)
depends on the basis of product characteristic (drug product and
drug substance),dosages form, route of administration container
closure system will be determine.
 For initial development stage various type of ccs will determine for
to plan the stability study & experiment describe in CQA.
1) Concept Development
d) Design of experiment and data analysis
 After selection of prototype and design space of container closure
system for drug formulation we can design the experiment to
validate and analyze our design space and selection of container
closure system.
 Design of experiment and data analysis will finally give an idea for
selection of final container closure system for drug formulation
quality. with effective depends on the selection of ccs, formulation
dosages form and route administration.
 Design of experiment at development stage will be high and
maximum data analysis generate for risk assessment.
 Maximum risk assessment at RnD level will reduce the risk at scale
up range and increase product quality.
2) Product Packaging development
 Design of experiment and data analysis will determine the
final container closure for the formulation.
 Final CCS further studied to verify and reduce the risk on
drug formulation quality.
 Following are the point of study to verify the CCS
a) Design verification
b) Validation
c) Stability
d) Real time process controls to ensure quality
f) Risk based change strategy
3) Product Packaging Industrialization
 RnD Development study will be the basis of selection of
container closure system for drug formulation scale up batch at
cGMP plant level.
 Tech transfer is the process to transfer the RnD process or
technology to plant level at plant level.
 This is the process to understand and establish what are plant
level equipment will required and also understand that plant scale
up equipment will not impact product quality and efficacy.
 Industrialization is the process to establish packaging line
feasibility and operation at industrial level
a) Design transfer
b) Market introduction
3) Product Packaging Industrialization
a) Design transfer
 Industrialization comes with transfer of technology from RnD to
Plant (Operation level)
 Large scale equipment need to use to produce commercial
requirements.
 In packaging development there are two stage of design transfer pre
approval or submission (exhibit batch) design transfer that comes
mainly primary packaging material selection, dummy unprinted
carton and batch coding.
 Some times submission batch has some manual operation.
 Machine details some time change at commercial scale.
 Product Post approval design transfer further require lots of activity
such as appropriate machine change part, automization, batch coding
details, printed packaging material development, track and trace
system, anti counterfeiting etc.
3) Product Packaging Industrialization
a) Design transfer
Example of Essentials of design transfer for “Integrated Blister Cartoning
Line”
 High Level of Automation (w/o Human intervention)
 Reliability
 Safety to Product
 High Operational Efficiencies
 Quick Change Over
 cGMP Norms
 Ease of Line Clearance
 Ease of Validation
 Flexibility to handle various Packaging films.
◦ Thermo Forming
◦ Cold Forming
 Flexibility to handle Multi Products in a Blister
3) Product Packaging Industrialization
a) Design transfer
Example of Essentials of design transfer for “Integrated Blister Cartoning
Line”
 Online Printing on Lidding Foils.
◦ Child Resistant Foil
◦ Print Registration
 Online Checks for Inserts and Cartons...
 Camera Systems for Products
 Pharma Code Readers
 2 – D Matrix Code
 Pin Hole Detector for both Cold Forming & Lidding
 Reject Verification
 OCR / OCV
 2 – D Matrix Code
 Track & Trace with Serialization / Random
 Online Check Weighing
 Online Bundler
3) Product Packaging Industrialization
b) Market introduction
 This is post approval commercial production of goods with printed
packaging material.
 Pharmaceutical product after primary secondary and tertiary
packaging it is safely reach to retail market with intact product
quality.
 Packaging material play very important role in safe and secure
transportation of goods.
 Labeling and dispensing instruction printed on packaging material
for safe use of drugs
 development of Trace and trace, bar code during packaging
development help in patient as well as distributor end.
 Without packaging development not a single product can be reached
in to market.
Saurav anand iip qbd packaging development

More Related Content

PPTX
Saurav anand iip process of pharma packaging development
PDF
003 pharmaceutical packaging
PPTX
Issue facing modern drug packaging, selection &amp; evaluation of pharmaceuti...
PPTX
Review of pharmaceutical product, packaging and ich
PPTX
Secondry and tertiary packaging new
PPT
Final gap analysis and impact assessment for packaging development for pharma...
PPTX
Container closure system and issues facing modern drug packaging
PDF
Pharmaceutical packaging
Saurav anand iip process of pharma packaging development
003 pharmaceutical packaging
Issue facing modern drug packaging, selection &amp; evaluation of pharmaceuti...
Review of pharmaceutical product, packaging and ich
Secondry and tertiary packaging new
Final gap analysis and impact assessment for packaging development for pharma...
Container closure system and issues facing modern drug packaging
Pharmaceutical packaging

What's hot (20)

PPTX
Strip packaging kvg
PPT
Line clearance basic
PPTX
Container and closures for pharmaceutical
PDF
Pharmaceutical packaging
PPTX
Pharmaceutical packaging
PPTX
Quality target product profile (QTPP)
PPTX
Defect of packaging
PPTX
Process analytical technology
PPTX
Packaging of pharmaceutical products
PPTX
Pharmaceutical Packaging
PPTX
PPTX
paharmaceutical packaging Medical device Packaging types of medical device p...
PPT
strip packaging
PPTX
BPR review and batch release
PPTX
Pharmaceutical packaging
PPTX
Cross contamination
PPT
Changeover Clearance
PPTX
validation of blister packaging machine
PPTX
Packaging designs and specifications
PPTX
Pharmaceutical Packaging
Strip packaging kvg
Line clearance basic
Container and closures for pharmaceutical
Pharmaceutical packaging
Pharmaceutical packaging
Quality target product profile (QTPP)
Defect of packaging
Process analytical technology
Packaging of pharmaceutical products
Pharmaceutical Packaging
paharmaceutical packaging Medical device Packaging types of medical device p...
strip packaging
BPR review and batch release
Pharmaceutical packaging
Cross contamination
Changeover Clearance
validation of blister packaging machine
Packaging designs and specifications
Pharmaceutical Packaging
Ad

Viewers also liked (20)

PPT
Packaging Development Benchmarking
PPTX
Advances in packaging development
PPTX
Quality by Design : Quality Target Product Profile & Critical Quality Attrib...
DOCX
ACG FINAL REPORT
PDF
QbD Model Case Study of MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY : A-Mab.
PDF
Applications for Water Activity and Sorption Isotherms in Pharmaceuticals
PDF
QbD Model Case Study of VACCINE : A-Vax.
PPTX
Vacuum forming
PPSX
FDA container closure system & drug stability saurav anand 23 iip
PPTX
Control of component, containers and closures
PPT
Blister & strip packaging
DOC
Sample Product Profile
PPTX
Vendor development
PPT
Supplier evaluation & selection
PPTX
Packaging
PPTX
Packaging project
PPT
Benchmarking
PPTX
PACKAGING OF TABLETS: TYPES, MATERIALS AND QC.
PDF
Pharma Packaging
PPTX
Selection and evaluation of pharmaceutical packaging materials, containers an...
Packaging Development Benchmarking
Advances in packaging development
Quality by Design : Quality Target Product Profile & Critical Quality Attrib...
ACG FINAL REPORT
QbD Model Case Study of MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY : A-Mab.
Applications for Water Activity and Sorption Isotherms in Pharmaceuticals
QbD Model Case Study of VACCINE : A-Vax.
Vacuum forming
FDA container closure system & drug stability saurav anand 23 iip
Control of component, containers and closures
Blister & strip packaging
Sample Product Profile
Vendor development
Supplier evaluation & selection
Packaging
Packaging project
Benchmarking
PACKAGING OF TABLETS: TYPES, MATERIALS AND QC.
Pharma Packaging
Selection and evaluation of pharmaceutical packaging materials, containers an...
Ad

Similar to Saurav anand iip qbd packaging development (20)

PDF
02 & 03 Packaging Management & selection of PM based on RnD & stability 29.0...
PDF
Pharmaceutical Development_Mohana (1).pdf
PPTX
PPTX
ICH Q8 " PHARMACEUTICAL DEVELOPMENT"
PPTX
FOR MASTERS IN PHARMACEUTICS STUDENTS ICH Q8 GUIDELINES OF QUALITY BY DESIGN
PPTX
Ich Q8 Pharmaceutical Development( comparison with Q9 and Q10 )
PPTX
Quality by Design
PPTX
Qb D Akhilesh Dwivedi
PPTX
ICH Q8 GUIDELINES OF QUALITY BY DESIGN(PRODUCT DEVELOPEMENT)
PDF
Best Practices - Injectable Packaging Lines
PPTX
ICH Guidelines: Brief overview QSEM.pptx
PPTX
PPTX
QBD quality by Design ppt as per ICH Q8 !
PPTX
QUALITY BY DESIGN qbd quality by design cad cadd
PPT
Implementing a QbD program for linkedin
PPTX
Quality by design
PPTX
Quality by Design, Objective & benefits of QbD, Elements of QbD, Design tools
PPTX
DEFINITION,PRINCIPLE, OBJECTIVES, ELEMENTS AND TOOLS OF QUALITY BY DESIGN (Qb...
PPTX
Quality by design in pharmaceutical development
02 & 03 Packaging Management & selection of PM based on RnD & stability 29.0...
Pharmaceutical Development_Mohana (1).pdf
ICH Q8 " PHARMACEUTICAL DEVELOPMENT"
FOR MASTERS IN PHARMACEUTICS STUDENTS ICH Q8 GUIDELINES OF QUALITY BY DESIGN
Ich Q8 Pharmaceutical Development( comparison with Q9 and Q10 )
Quality by Design
Qb D Akhilesh Dwivedi
ICH Q8 GUIDELINES OF QUALITY BY DESIGN(PRODUCT DEVELOPEMENT)
Best Practices - Injectable Packaging Lines
ICH Guidelines: Brief overview QSEM.pptx
QBD quality by Design ppt as per ICH Q8 !
QUALITY BY DESIGN qbd quality by design cad cadd
Implementing a QbD program for linkedin
Quality by design
Quality by Design, Objective & benefits of QbD, Elements of QbD, Design tools
DEFINITION,PRINCIPLE, OBJECTIVES, ELEMENTS AND TOOLS OF QUALITY BY DESIGN (Qb...
Quality by design in pharmaceutical development

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
Human Health And Disease hggyutgghg .pdf
PPTX
Important Obstetric Emergency that must be recognised
PPT
Management of Acute Kidney Injury at LAUTECH
PPT
1b - INTRODUCTION TO EPIDEMIOLOGY (comm med).ppt
PPT
MENTAL HEALTH - NOTES.ppt for nursing students
PDF
Therapeutic Potential of Citrus Flavonoids in Metabolic Inflammation and Ins...
PPTX
LUNG ABSCESS - respiratory medicine - ppt
PDF
NEET PG 2025 | 200 High-Yield Recall Topics Across All Subjects
PPTX
SKIN Anatomy and physiology and associated diseases
PPTX
surgery guide for USMLE step 2-part 1.pptx
PPT
Obstructive sleep apnea in orthodontics treatment
PPT
STD NOTES INTRODUCTION TO COMMUNITY HEALT STRATEGY.ppt
DOCX
RUHS II MBBS Microbiology Paper-II with Answer Key | 6th August 2025 (New Sch...
PPTX
ACID BASE management, base deficit correction
PPTX
NEET PG 2025 Pharmacology Recall | Real Exam Questions from 3rd August with D...
PPTX
POLYCYSTIC OVARIAN SYNDROME.pptx by Dr( med) Charles Amoateng
PPTX
Acid Base Disorders educational power point.pptx
PPT
OPIOID ANALGESICS AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS
PPTX
Uterus anatomy embryology, and clinical aspects
PPTX
Neuropathic pain.ppt treatment managment
Human Health And Disease hggyutgghg .pdf
Important Obstetric Emergency that must be recognised
Management of Acute Kidney Injury at LAUTECH
1b - INTRODUCTION TO EPIDEMIOLOGY (comm med).ppt
MENTAL HEALTH - NOTES.ppt for nursing students
Therapeutic Potential of Citrus Flavonoids in Metabolic Inflammation and Ins...
LUNG ABSCESS - respiratory medicine - ppt
NEET PG 2025 | 200 High-Yield Recall Topics Across All Subjects
SKIN Anatomy and physiology and associated diseases
surgery guide for USMLE step 2-part 1.pptx
Obstructive sleep apnea in orthodontics treatment
STD NOTES INTRODUCTION TO COMMUNITY HEALT STRATEGY.ppt
RUHS II MBBS Microbiology Paper-II with Answer Key | 6th August 2025 (New Sch...
ACID BASE management, base deficit correction
NEET PG 2025 Pharmacology Recall | Real Exam Questions from 3rd August with D...
POLYCYSTIC OVARIAN SYNDROME.pptx by Dr( med) Charles Amoateng
Acid Base Disorders educational power point.pptx
OPIOID ANALGESICS AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS
Uterus anatomy embryology, and clinical aspects
Neuropathic pain.ppt treatment managment

Saurav anand iip qbd packaging development

  • 1. Quality By Design for Packaging Development By Saurav Anand +91-8511773466 Packaging Development, IIP, MBA
  • 2. Quality By Design approach of Packaging Development Definition A systematic approach to development that begins with predefined objectives and emphasizes product and process understanding, as well as process control, which are based on sound science and quality risk management. Component Critical Quality Attributes (CQAs) are physical, chemical, biological or microbiological properties or characteristics that should be within an appropriate limit, range, or distribution to ensure the desired product quality. Critical Process Parameter (CPP) is a process parameter whose variability has an impact on the CQA. The CPP should be monitored and controlled to ensure that the process produces products with desired quality specifications.
  • 3. Quality By Design approach of Packaging Development Design space is the multidimensional combination and interaction of input variables (e.g., material attributes) and process parameters that have been demonstrated to provide assurance of quality. Working within this design space is not considered a change. Quality Target Product Profile (QTPP) is a prospective summary of the quality characteristics of a drug product that ideally will be achieved to ensure the desired quality. QTPP also takes into account safety and efficacy of the drug product. Packaging aspects must be considered during the development of product. The packaging process parameters may affect the final product quality. During the development of packaging for products, it is important to understand the impact of material attributes and process parameters on CQAs. It is essential to identify and control the sources of variability. It is also critical to continue to monitor these throughout the lifecycle of the product.
  • 4. Fundamentals of Container Closure System (CCS) Containers A containers for Pharmaceutical use is an article which holds or is intended to contain and protect a drug and is or may be in direct contact with it. The closure is a part of the container. The container and its closure must not interact physically or chemically with the substance within in any way that would alter its quality. USP Tamper-Evident Packaging Light-Resistant Container Well-Closed Container Tight Container Hermetic Container Single-Unit Container Single-Dose Container Unit-Dose Containers Unit-of-Use Containers Multiple-Unit Containers Multiple-dose Containers
  • 5. Fundamentals of Container Closure System (CCS) Packaging material  Any material employed in the packaging of a medicinal products, excluding any outer packaging used for transportation or shipment.  Packaging materials are referred to as primary or secondary according to whether or not they are intended to be in direct contact with the product.  Any single part of a container closure system. Typical components are Containers , Container liners Closures, Closure liners Stopper overseals, Container inner seals Administration ports overwraps Administration accessories Container labels
  • 6. Fundamentals of Container Closure System (CCS) Primary packaging component Packaging component that is or may be in direct contact with the dosage form. Secondary packaging component Packaging component that is not and will not be in direct contact with the dosage form. Container closure system The sum of packaging components that together contain and protect the dosage form. This includes primary packaging components & secondary packaging components, if the latter are intended to provide additional protection to the drug product. Packaging system is equivalent to a container closure system
  • 7. Type of Packaging by Route of Administration Route of Administration Type of Packaging
  • 8. Key Selection Criteria – Packaging Films Choosing the most appropriate pack  Shelf life enhancement.  Material options – Barrier & Type ( Halogenated & Non-Halogenated) .  Comply Quality by Design (QbD)  Regional regulatory requirements.(e.g. CR/SF features).  Anti-Counterfeit protection.  Enable branding.  Machine-packaging material interface – to improve productivity.  Cost optimization. Additional drivers & future challenges:  Moisture sensitive drugs increasing barrier requirements  Novel delivery systems  Emphasis on speed to market  Control of R&D Expenditure/resource - number of stability studies required  Global - Regional - Local packs  Anti-counterfeiting, illegal cross-border trading  Pharmacogenomics - Personalised medicines  Demographic change - Ageing population
  • 9. Quality By Design (QBD) approach for Packaging Development Overview 1) Concept development a) Voice –of the-customer-resulted in established the QTPPs (Quality target product profile) b) Establish CQAs (Critical quality attributes) c) Concept and prototype selections d) Design of experiment and data analysis 2) Product Development a) Design verification b) Validation c) Stability d) Real time process controls to ensure quality f) Risk based change strategy 3) Industrialization a) Design transfer b) Market introduction
  • 10. Quality By Design (QBD) approach for Packaging Development 1) Concept Development a) Voice –of the-customer-resulted in established the QTPPs (Quality target product profile) b) Establish CQAs (Critical quality attributes) c) Concept and prototype selections d) Design of experiment and data analysis
  • 11. 1) Concept development a) QTPPs (Quality target product profile) Voice –of the-customer-resulted in established The quality target product profile(QTPP) relates to quality, safety and efficacy. Suitability – tests and studies and accepted for the initial qualification of a component or a container closure system for its intend use.  Protection  Safety  Compatibility  Performance & Dose delivery.
  • 12. 1) Concept development a) QTPPs (Quality target product profile) Examples of Packaging Concerns for Common Classes of Drug Products Degree of Concern Associated with the Route of Administration Likelihood of Packaging Component-Dosage Form Interaction High Medium Low Highest Inhalation Aerosols & Solutions; Injection & Injectable Suspension Sterile Powders & Powders for Injection; Inhalation Powders High Ophthalmic Solutions & Suspension; Transdermal Ointments & Patches; Nasal Aerosol & Sprays Low Topical Solutions & Suspensions; Topical & Lingual Aerosols; Oral Solutions & Suspension Topical Powders; Oral Powder Oral Tablets & Oral (Hard & Soft Gelatin) Capsules
  • 13. a) QTPPs (Quality target product profile) Overall general description of the container closure system, plus: For Each Packaging Component: Name, product code, manufacturer, physical description Materials of construction (for each: name, manufacturer, product code) Description of any additional treatments or preparations Protection: (By each component and/or the container closure system, as appropriate) Light exposure , Reactive gases (e.g., oxygen) , Moisture permeation , Solvent loss or leakage Microbial contamination(sterility/container integrity, increased bioburden, microbial limits) Filth Other Safety: (for each material of construction, as appropriate) Chemical composition of all plastics, elastomers, adhesives, etc. Extractables, as appropriate for the material Extraction/toxicological evaluation studies, as appropriate Appropriate USP testing Appropriate reference to the indirect food additive regulations (21 CFR174-186) Other studies as appropriate Compatibility: (for each component and/or the packaging system, as appropriate) Component/dosage form interaction, USP methods are typically accepted May also be addressed in post-approval stability studies Performance: (for the assembled packaging system) Functionality and/or drug delivery, as appropriate For Each Packaging Component Received by the Applicant: Applicant's tests and acceptance criteriac Dimensional (drawing) and performance criteria Method to monitor consistency in composition, as appropriate For Each Packaging Component Provided by the Supplier: Manufacturer's acceptance criteria for release, as appropriate Brief description of the manufacturing process Stability - As per ICH Guidelines 1) Concept development a)QTPPs Quality target product profile) DescriptionSuitabilityQualityControl
  • 14. 1) Concept development a) QTPPs Quality target product profile Route of Administration/ Dosage Form Suitability Protection Compatibility Safety Performance/ Drug Delivery Inhalation Aerosols and Solutions, Nasal Sprays L, S, M, W, G Case 1c Case 1s Case 1d Inhalation Powders L, M, W Case 3c Case 5s Case 1d Injections, Injectable Suspensions L, S, M, G Case 1c Case 2s Case 2d Sterile Powders and Powders for Injection L, M, W Case 2c Case 2s Case 2d Ophthalmic Solutions & Suspensions L, S, M, G Case 1c Case 2s Case 2d Topical Delivery Systems L, S Case 1c Case 3s Case 1d Topical Solutions & Suspensions, and Topical and Lingual Aerosols L, S, M, Case 1c Case 3s Case 2d Topical Powders L, M, W Case 3c Case 4s Case 3d Oral Solutions and Suspensions L, S, M Case 1c Case 3s Case 2d Oral Powders L,W Case 2c Case 3s Case 3d Oral Tablets and Oral (Hard and Soft Gelatin) L, W Case 3c Case 4s Case 3d
  • 15. 1) Concept development b) Critical quality attributes (CQA) Quality control packaging material testing typically used and accepted to established the critical quality attributes, and performed test give qualification of packaging component and container closure system continue to passes the characteristics test established under CQA, it is essential for quality of product. It can be controlled and studies (QC)- Physical & Chemical characteristic : Quality Control of Packaging Components Physical Characteristics  Dimensional criteria.  Physical parameters critical to the consistent manufacture of the packaging component Performance characteristics. Chemical Characteristics  May affect the safety, compatibility, functional characteristics or protective properties of a packaging components.
  • 16. 1) Concept development b) Parameter to established Critical quality attributes (CQA) Dimension study USP/EP test USP 660, 671,661,381,87 88 , EP 32 etc ESCR test Leak test IR Study OTR/MVTR Study DSC test Spray pattern study Dose delivery study Lacquer uniformity study Sterility test E/L study
  • 17. 1) Concept development Interrelationship between QTPP Vs CQA Attributes Concerns and Interaction Proposed Methods Protection Exposure to light, moisture, microbial ingress, and oxidation from presence of oxygen USP<661>Light Transmission and Water Vapor Permeation, Container Integrity (Microbial ingress, Dye Penetration, Helium Leak) Compatibility Leachable induced degradation, absorption or adsorption of drug, precipitation, changes in pH, discoloration, brittleness of packaging materials Leachability Study (Migration of chemicals into drug product) using LC/MS, GC/MS, ICP/AA, pH, appearance of drug and container, Thermal analysis (DSC, TGA), IR Safety No leached harmful or undesirable amounts of substances to expose patients treated with drug Extraction study (USP Physicochemical Tests- Plastics), USP Elastomeric Closures for Injections, Toxicological Evaluation, USP Biological Reactivity and complied with CFR additives and purity Performance Container closure system fuctionality, drug delivery Functionality (improved patient compliance or use) Delivery (transfer dose in right amount or rate)
  • 18. 1) Concept Development c) Concept and prototype selections  Study of QTPP and CQA will help to established the concept and prototype selection of container closure system.  Concept and prototype selections of container closure system (ccs) will determine the design space for specific formulation  At each stage of the development cycle several factors influenced the progression of new design. Uncertainty is reduced through statistical analysis.  Selection and development of container closure system (ccs) depends on the basis of product characteristic (drug product and drug substance),dosages form, route of administration container closure system will be determine.  For initial development stage various type of ccs will determine for to plan the stability study & experiment describe in CQA.
  • 19. 1) Concept Development d) Design of experiment and data analysis  After selection of prototype and design space of container closure system for drug formulation we can design the experiment to validate and analyze our design space and selection of container closure system.  Design of experiment and data analysis will finally give an idea for selection of final container closure system for drug formulation quality. with effective depends on the selection of ccs, formulation dosages form and route administration.  Design of experiment at development stage will be high and maximum data analysis generate for risk assessment.  Maximum risk assessment at RnD level will reduce the risk at scale up range and increase product quality.
  • 20. 2) Product Packaging development  Design of experiment and data analysis will determine the final container closure for the formulation.  Final CCS further studied to verify and reduce the risk on drug formulation quality.  Following are the point of study to verify the CCS a) Design verification b) Validation c) Stability d) Real time process controls to ensure quality f) Risk based change strategy
  • 21. 3) Product Packaging Industrialization  RnD Development study will be the basis of selection of container closure system for drug formulation scale up batch at cGMP plant level.  Tech transfer is the process to transfer the RnD process or technology to plant level at plant level.  This is the process to understand and establish what are plant level equipment will required and also understand that plant scale up equipment will not impact product quality and efficacy.  Industrialization is the process to establish packaging line feasibility and operation at industrial level a) Design transfer b) Market introduction
  • 22. 3) Product Packaging Industrialization a) Design transfer  Industrialization comes with transfer of technology from RnD to Plant (Operation level)  Large scale equipment need to use to produce commercial requirements.  In packaging development there are two stage of design transfer pre approval or submission (exhibit batch) design transfer that comes mainly primary packaging material selection, dummy unprinted carton and batch coding.  Some times submission batch has some manual operation.  Machine details some time change at commercial scale.  Product Post approval design transfer further require lots of activity such as appropriate machine change part, automization, batch coding details, printed packaging material development, track and trace system, anti counterfeiting etc.
  • 23. 3) Product Packaging Industrialization a) Design transfer Example of Essentials of design transfer for “Integrated Blister Cartoning Line”  High Level of Automation (w/o Human intervention)  Reliability  Safety to Product  High Operational Efficiencies  Quick Change Over  cGMP Norms  Ease of Line Clearance  Ease of Validation  Flexibility to handle various Packaging films. ◦ Thermo Forming ◦ Cold Forming  Flexibility to handle Multi Products in a Blister
  • 24. 3) Product Packaging Industrialization a) Design transfer Example of Essentials of design transfer for “Integrated Blister Cartoning Line”  Online Printing on Lidding Foils. ◦ Child Resistant Foil ◦ Print Registration  Online Checks for Inserts and Cartons...  Camera Systems for Products  Pharma Code Readers  2 – D Matrix Code  Pin Hole Detector for both Cold Forming & Lidding  Reject Verification  OCR / OCV  2 – D Matrix Code  Track & Trace with Serialization / Random  Online Check Weighing  Online Bundler
  • 25. 3) Product Packaging Industrialization b) Market introduction  This is post approval commercial production of goods with printed packaging material.  Pharmaceutical product after primary secondary and tertiary packaging it is safely reach to retail market with intact product quality.  Packaging material play very important role in safe and secure transportation of goods.  Labeling and dispensing instruction printed on packaging material for safe use of drugs  development of Trace and trace, bar code during packaging development help in patient as well as distributor end.  Without packaging development not a single product can be reached in to market.