Sc structure-nc serials-pres
Download as PPTX, PDF1 like349 views
This document discusses a survey of scholarly communication services at academic libraries. It summarizes the results of the survey, which found that most large ARL libraries have dedicated scholarly communication units or librarians, while smaller non-ARL libraries are more likely to distribute responsibilities across individual librarians. The top services provided by both types of libraries include outreach on authors' rights, hosting institutional repositories, and supporting open access publishing and digital scholarship. The document reflects on how libraries can strategically provide core scholarly communication services to support research at all institution sizes.
Sc structure-nc serials-pres
- 1. Wm. JosephThomas March 15, 2013 The Structure of Scholarly Communications within Academic Libraries
- 2. What do we mean by Scholarly Communications? “…the creation, transformation, dissemination, and preservation of knowledge related to teaching, research, and scholarly endeavors” SPEC Kit definition borrowed from the Scholarly Communications Group, Washington University in St. Louis
- 3. SPEC Kit 332 Organization of Scholarly Communication Services, November 2013 Surveyed ARL Libraries http://publications.arl.org/Organization- of-Scholarly-Communication-Services- SPEC-Kit-332/
- 4. Libraries Studied ARL Libraries 61 responses (48%) 46 Carnegie RU/VH – 33 public 8 Carnegie RUH – 6 public 6 Canadian ARL members – all public Public 45 / Private 15 Library of Congress
- 5. Libraries Studied Non-ARL Libraries 64 responses (39%) – 27 from NC 15 Carnegie RU/VH 21 Carnegie RUH (2 NC) 6 Carnegie DRU (3 NC) 14 Master’s (all NC) 8 Baccalaureate (all NC)
- 6. Leadership of Scholarly Communications ARL Libraries Single Librarian Library Unit Two Or More Librarians Library Committee Not Any Single Person or Group
- 7. Leadership of Scholarly Communications Non-ARL Libraries No Yes-librarians Yes-faculty SC Committee? 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Library Leader None Dept Two or More Single Lib
- 8. Admin Structure and Change ARL Libraries Non-ARL Libraries AD or SC librarian Reports to Director orAD Little formal assessment, but “demonstrable outcomes” 39 of 54 had change in structure since 2007 SC,Admin, or Research Reports to Director,AD or Provost (if Director) Little formal assessment 66% of positions changed since 2007 (most of them in last two years)
- 9. Scholarly Communication Services Overview Outreach and Educational Activities Inc.Authors Rights Hosting Digital Content Inc. Institutional Repositories Digital Scholarship Support Inc. OpenAccess Fund
- 10. Outreach and Educational Activities ARL Libraries 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Authors: Funding Mandates Authors Rights Faculty: SC Issues and Services Grad Students: SC Issues and Services Undergrads: SC Issues and Services Events Campuswide SC Docs and Whitepapers
- 11. Outreach and Educational Activities Non-ARL Libraries 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Author's Rights Authors OA Group Events DMPs Grads ETDs Not Offered Elsewhere Library
- 12. Hosting and Managing Digital Content ARL Libraries 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Data Management Digitization Data Mining, Visualization, GIS Institutional Repository Subject Repository Support Campus ETDs
- 13. Hosting and Managing Digital Content Non-ARL Libraries 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 IR E-Journals Data Digitization Not Offered Elsewhere Library
- 14. Other Digital Publishing and Support ARL Libraries 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 New Forms of Publishing Publish E- Journals OA Publishing Fund DH, E- Science Also mentioned: • Production of multimedia • Assist with Lit Reviews • Support Patent Research • Assist with DOIs
- 15. Digital Scholarship and Other Services Non-ARL Libraries Also mentioned: • Partner with Research Office, Legal • Reserves, Fair Use • New faculty, grad orientation 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 New Forms OA Fund Not Offered Elsewhere Library
- 16. Samples…
- 19. Reflections Can libraries avoid being left out of the loop? How to bridge gap across such a wide variety of library sizes? What services to offer, strategically and sustainably? Perhaps a set of Scholarly Communication Core Services?
- 20. Potential for Growth Shared Support for Expertise: ACRL’s Scholarly CommunicationToolkit ASERL’s newVPO for Scholarly Communication ARL’s “Developing a Scholarly Communication Program inYour Library” ULAC Scholarly CommunicationWorking Group
- 21. Potential for Growth Shared Support forTechnical Infrastructure: Institutional Repositories Open Journal Systems Dataverse
- 22. Scholarly Communications Core Services (?) Program-Oriented, or Librarian Competencies? OpenAccess Copyright and PublishingAgreements Research Support
- 23. Scholarly Communications Core Services (?) OpenAccess: Help authors make their works open access (including deposit) Understand variety of publishing models Copyright and PublishingAgreements Research Support
- 24. Scholarly Communications Core Services (?) OpenAccess Copyright and PublishingAgreements: Help patrons use copyrighted materials fairly and legally Advise authors on their publishing agreements Research Support
- 25. Scholarly Communications Core Services (?) OpenAccess Copyright and PublishingAgreements Research Support: Help users evaluate OA resources among their lit reviews Help authors comply with funding mandates (including DMP)
- 26. Resources Radom, Feltner-Reichert, and Stringer-Stanback. Organization of Scholarly Communication Resources, SPEC Kit 332.Association of Research Libraries , Nov. 2012. ACRL,“Scholarly CommunicationToolkit,” http://scholcomm.acrl.ala.org/ ARL Office of Scholarly Communication, “Advancing Scholarly Communication,” http://www.arl.org/sc/index.shtml SPARC,The Scholarly Publishing andAcademic Resources Coalition, http://www.arl.org/sparc/