seismicretrofitting of existing structure
- 1. PRESENTED BY GUIDE: Dr . NEETHU URS, Professor ADITYA BIRADAR DAYANANDA SAGAR COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING 1DS20CV005 SIESMIC RETROFITTING OF EXISTING STRUCTURES: “TECHNIQUES AND CASE STUDIES” TECHNICAL SEMINAR DAYANANDA SAGAR COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING An Autonomous Institution affiliated to Visvesvaraya Technological University, Belagavi, Shavige Malleswara Hills, Kumara swamy layout Bangalore – 560111
- 2. Introduction Earthquake creates great devastation in terms of life, money and failures of structures. Earthquake Mitigation is an important field of study from a long time now. It is of utmost importance for historic monuments, areas prone to severe earthquakes and tall or expensive structures. 1
- 3. Seismic Retrofitting Definition It is the modification of existing structures to make them more resistant to seismic activity, ground motion, or soil failure due to earthquakes. The retrofit techniques are also applicable for other natural hazards such as tropical cyclones, tornadoes, and severe winds from thunderstorms. When is Seismic Retrofitting Needed ? The two circumstances are:- Earthquake damaged buildings, and Earthquake-vulnerable buildings (with no exposure to severe earthquakes) 2
- 4. Retrofit Performance Objectives Public safety only: The goal is to protect human life, ensuring that the structure will not collapse upon its occupants or passersby, and that the structure can be safely exited. Structure survivability: The goal is that the structure, while remaining safe for exit, may require extensive repair (but not replacement) before it is generally useful or considered safe for occupation. This is typically the lowest level of retrofit applied to bridges. Structure functionality: Primary structure undamaged and the structure is undiminished in utility for its primary application. Structure unaffected: This level of retrofit is preferred for historic structures of high cultural significance. 4
- 5. Need of Retrofitting in Existing Earthquake Vulnerable Buildings Buildings have been designed according to a seismic code, but the code has been upgraded in later years; Buildings designed to meet the modern seismic codes, but deficiencies exist in the design and/or construction; Essential buildings must be strengthened like hospitals, historical monuments and architectural buildings; Problems faced by Structural Engineers are :- Lack of standards for retrofitting methods Effectiveness of each methods varies a lot depending upon parameters like type of structures, material condition, amount of damage , etc. 6
- 6. Basic Concept of Retrofitting Upgradation of lateral strength of the structure; Increase in the ductility of the structure Increase in strength and ductility 8 Earthquake Design Philosophy Under minor but frequent shaking, the main members of the building that carry vertical and horizontal forces should not be damaged; however building parts that do not carry load may sustain repairable damage; Under moderate but occasional shaking, the main members may sustain repairable damage, while the other parts of the building may be damaged such that they may even have to be replaced after the earthquake; and Under strong but rare shaking, the main members may sustain severe (even irreparable) damage, but the building should not collapse.
- 7. Classification of Retrofitting Techniques 10
- 8. Some Conventional Approaches Adding New Shear Walls Frequently used for retrofitting of non ductile reinforced concrete frame buildings. The added elements can be either cast‐in‐place or precast concrete elements. New elements preferably be placed at the exterior of the building. 11 Not preferred in the interior of the structure to avoid interior mouldings. Fig:Additional Shear Wall
- 9. Adding Steel Bracings An effective solution when large openings are required. Potential advantages for the following reasons: ⚫higher strength and stiffness, ⚫opening for natural light, ⚫amount of work is less since foundation cost may be minimized adds much less weight to the existing structure 12 Fig: RC Building retrofitted by steel bracing
- 10. Some Conventional Approaches (Contd.) Jacketing (Local Retrofitting Technique) Most popular method for strengthening of building columns Types-1. Steel jacket, 2. Reinforced Concrete jacket, 3. Fibre Reinforced Polymer Composite(FRPC) jacket Purpose for jacketing: ⚫To increase concrete confinement ⚫To increase shear strength ⚫To increase flexural strength 15 Fig: Column Jacketing Fig: Beam Jacketing
- 11. Retrofit of Structures using Innovative Materials Current research on advanced materials has mainly concentrated on FRP composites. Studies have shown that externally bonded FRP composites can be applied to various structural members including columns, beams, slabs, and walls to improve their structural performance such as stiffness, load carrying capacity, and ductility. 17
- 12. Base Isolation (or Seismic Isolation) Isolation of superstructure from the foundation is known as base isolation. It is the most powerful tool for passive structural vibration control technique Fig: Base Isolated Structures 19
- 13. Concept of Base Isolation Significantly Increase the Period of the Structure and the Damping so that the Response is Significantly Reduced. Fig: Spectral Response for a Typical Base Isolation System 20 Types of Base Isolations Base isolation systems which uses Elastomeric Bearings Base isolation systems with Sliding System Fig: Elastomeric Isolators
- 14. Elastomeric Base Isolation Systems This is the mostly widely used Base Isolator. The elastomer is made of either Natural Rubber or Neoprene. The structure is decoupled from the horizontal components of the earthquake ground motion. Alayer with low horizontal stiffness introduced between the structure and the foundation. 22 Fig: Steel Reinforced Elastomeric Isolators
- 15. Advantages of Base Isolation Isolates Building from ground motion Lesser seismic loads, hence lesser damage to the structure. Minimal repair of superstructure. Building can remain serviceable throughout construction. Does not involve major intrusion upon existing superstructure. 30 Disadvantages of Base Isolation Expensive Cannot be applied partially to structures unlike other retrofitting Challenging to implement in an efficient manner Allowance for building displacements Inefficient for high rise buildings Not suitable for buildings rested on soft soil.
- 16. Seismic Dampers Seismic Dampers are used in place of structural elements, like diagonal braces, for controlling seismic damage in structures. It partly absorbs the seismic energy and reduces the motion of buildings. Types:- Viscous Dampers (energy is absorbed by silicone-based fluid passing between piston-cylinder arrangement), Friction Dampers (energy is absorbed by surfaces with friction between them rubbing against each other), and Yielding Dampers (energy is absorbed by metallic components that yield). 33
- 17. Viscous Dampers Fig: Cross-section of a Viscous Fluid Damper 34
- 18. Tuned Mass Damper(TMD) It is also known as an active mass damper (AMD) or harmonic absorber. It is a device mounted in structures to reduce the amplitude of mechanical vibrations. Their application can prevent discomfort, damage, or outright structural failure. They are frequently used in power transmission, automobiles and tall buildings. Fig: TMD in Taipei 101 35 Taipei 101 has the largest TMD sphere in the world and weighs 660 metric tonnes with a diameter of 5.5 metre and costs US$4 million (total structure costs US$ 1.80 billion). Fig: TMD in Taipei 101
- 19. Indian Codes for Earthquake Design IS: 1893-2002 (part-1) Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures (Part 1 : General Provision and Buildings) - Code of Practice IS: 4326-1993 Earthquake Resistant Design and Construction of Buildings – Code of Practice IS: 13920-1993 Ductile Detailing of Reinforced Concrete Structures subjected to Seismic Forces – Code of Practice IS: 13935-1993 Repair and Seismic Strengthening of Buildings – Guidelines IS: 13828-1993 Improving Earthquake Resistance of Low Strength Masonary Buildings - Guidelines IS: 13827-1993 Improving Earthquake Resistance of Earthen Buildings – Guidelines 38
- 20. Case Study : Mani Mandir Complex at Morbi, Gujarat • The Mani Mandir complex is an important historic monument of town of Morbi in state of Gujarat, suffering significant damage during the M7.7 Bhuj earthquake. • The complex was modelled using finite elements and behaviour was studied of the existing structure as well as retrofit structure 39
- 21. Case Study : Mani Mandir Complex at Morbi, Gujarat • Damage documentation 1. Stone slab wedged between steel joists 2. Separation of joist flanges and failure of stone slab 3. Destruction of arches in elevational elements 4. Partial collapse of Bastions 5. Openings of joints in arch 6. Diagonal cracks in walls 39
- 22. Case Study : Mani Mandir Complex at Morbi, Gujarat 39
- 23. Case Study : Mani Mandir Complex at Morbi, Gujarat METHODOLOGIES FOR REPAIR, RESTORATION AND RETROFITTING • Introducing rigid diaphragm action of slab : for improved seismic performance a rigid diaphragm was required to be put in place at both the floor levels. The diaphragm action was proposed by introducing diagonal bracing elements on underside of first floor. • Enhancing strength of structure : due to poor bonding of stone masonry walls were unable to provide adequate lateral strength. Various options were considered such as introducing new shear walls, strengthening existing walls by shotcreting and providing base isolation. 39
- 24. Case Study : Mani Mandir Complex at Morbi, Gujarat METHODOLOGIES FOR REPAIR, RESTORATION AND RETROFITTING • End pinning of wall corners: proposed to securely connect the perpendicular walls to each other by cross pinning with stainless steel rods of 8mm and 10mm dia at every 600mm along height. • Introduction of horizontal reinforced bands to existing masonry walls to [rovide seismic features and to improve their performance and ductility. • Strengthening of Arches : based on damage 2 retrofit details had been recommended. For movement of support and internal arches a stainless steel tie with turn buckle is proposed. For no movement of supports keystone is tied back into wall above my means of stainless steel rod 39
- 25. Case Study : Mani Mandir Complex at Morbi, Gujarat METHODOLOGIES FOR REPAIR, RESTORATION AND RETROFITTING • Cross pinning of corridor columns: columns are made up of 3 stones interlocked by socket system. It is proposed to hold up these stones profoundly. • Stitching and grouting of cracks in walls : diagonal cracks are to be stitched using stainless steel bars before the cracks are grouted 39
- 26. Conclusion Seismic Retrofitting is a suitable technology for protection of a variety of structures. It has matured in the recent years to a highly reliable technology. But, the expertise needed is not available in the basic level. The main challenge is to achieve a desired performance level at a minimum cost, which can be achieved through a detailed nonlinear analysis. Optimization techniques are needed to know the most efficient retrofit for a particular structure. Proper Design Codes are needed to be published as code of practice for professionals related to this field. 39
- 27. References Agarwal, P. and Shrikhande, M., 2006, Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures, 2nd Edition, Prentice-Hall of India Private Limited, New Delhi. Cardone, D. and Dolce, M., 2003, Seismic Protection of Light Secondary Systems through Different Base Isolation Systems, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 7 (2), 223-250. Constantinou, M.C., Symans, M.D., Tsopelas, P., and Taylor, D.P., 1993, Fluid Viscous Dampers in Applications of Seismic Energy Dissipation and Seismic Isolation, ATC-17-1, Applied Technology Council, San Francisco. EERI, 1999, Lessons Learnt Over Time – Learning from Earthquakes Series: Volume II Innovative Recovery in India, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland (CA), USA. Murty, C.V.R., 2004, IITK-BMTPC Earthquake Tip, New Delhi. Siesimic Retrofitting of Mani Mandir Complex at Morbi, Gujarat, India. Alpa Sheth, R D Chaudhari, Ejaz Khan, Divay Gupta, Malvika Saini. World conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, B.C., Canada 2004 40
- 28. THANK YOU… 41