SlideShare a Scribd company logo
SCANNING ELECTRON
MICROSCOPE
Course instructor
Dr Venkata Girish Kotnur
Assistant Professor
University of Hyderabad
Presented by
Mahfooz Alam
M.TECH.
17ETMM10
History
 TEM constructed in 1931 by Max Knoll and Ernst Ruska
 Ruska was awarded the Nobel Prize in physics for the development of
transmission electron microscopy
 Von Ardenne first STEM in 1938 by rastering the electron beam in a
TEM
 Zworykin et al. 1942, first SEM for bulk samples
 Manfred von Ardenne who in 1937 invented a true SEM
 1965 first commercial SEM by Cambridge Scientific Instruments
Resolution at that time ~ 50 nm : Today < 1 nm
Morphology only at that time : Today analytical instrument
What is SEM?
 It is a microscope that produces an image by using an
electron beam that scans the surface of a specimen
inside a vacuum chamber.
What can we study in a SEM?
• Topography and morphology
• Chemistry
• Crystallography
• Orientation of grains
• In-situ experiments:
– Reactions with atmosphere
– Effects of temperature
“Easy”
sample
preparation!!
“Big”
samples!
What does it looks like….
AFM Cantilever Tip Ant Head Blood Cells
Diamond Thin Film
(Numerous Multifaceted Micro-
crystals)
Microstructure of a plain carbon
steel that contains 0.44 wt% of
carbon
Calcium Phosphate
Crystal
The Instrument in Brief
Components of the Instrument
• electron gun (filament)
• electromagnetic optics
• scan coils
• sample stage
• detectors
• vacuum system
• computer hardware and software
Electron Guns
 We want many electrons per time unit
per area (high current density) and as
small electron spot as possible
 Traditional guns: thermionic electron
gun (electrons are emitted when a
solid is heated)
 W-wire, LaB6-crystal
 Modern: field emission guns (FEG)
(cold guns, a strong electric field is
used to extract electrons)
 Single crystal of W, etched to a thin
tip
Detectors
Secondary electron detector:
(Everhart-Thornley)
Backscattered electron
detector:
(Solid-State Detector)
 Secondary electrons: Everhart-Thornley Detector
 Backscattered electrons: Solid State Detector
 X-rays: Energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS)
HOW THE SEM WORKS?
 The SEM uses electrons instead of light to form an
image.
 A beam of electrons is produced at the top of the
microscope by heating of a metallic filament.
 The electron beam follows a vertical path through
the column of the microscope. It makes its way through
electromagnetic lenses which focus and direct the
beam down towards the sample.
 Once it hits the sample, other electrons
( backscattered or secondary ) are ejected from the
sample. Detectors collect the secondary or
backscattered electrons, and convert them to a signal
that is sent to a viewing screen similar to the one in an
ordinary television, producing an image.
How do we get an image?
156 electrons!
Image
Detector
Electron gun
288 electrons!
Electron beam-sample interactions
 The incident electron beam is scattered in the sample,
both elastically and inelastically
 This gives rise to various signals that we can detect (more
on that on next slide)
 Interaction volume increases with increasing acceleration
voltage and decreases with increasing atomic number
Signals from the sample
Incoming electrons
Secondary electrons
Backscattered
electrons
Auger electrons
X-rays
Cathodo-
luminescence (light)
Sample
Where does the signals come from?
• Diameter of the interaction
volume is larger than the
electron spot
 resolution is poorer than the
size of the electron spot
Secondary electrons (SE)
 Generated from the collision
between the incoming electrons
and the loosely bonded outer
electrons
 Low energy electrons (~10-50 eV)
 Only SE generated close to
surface escape (topographic
information is obtained)
 Number of SE is greater than the
number of incoming electrons
 We differentiate between SE1 and
SE2
SE1
 The secondary electrons that are generated by the
incoming electron beam as they enter the surface
 High resolution signal with a resolution which is only
limited by the electron beam diameter
SE2
 The secondary electrons that are
generated by the backscattered
electrons that have returned to the
surface after several inelastic
scattering events
 SE2 come from a surface area that
is bigger than the spot from the
incoming electrons  resolution is
poorer than for SE1 exclusively
Sample
surface
Incoming electrons
SE2
Backscattered electrons (BSE)
 A fraction of the incident electrons is
retarded by the electro-magnetic field of
the nucleus and if the scattering angle
is greater than 180° the electron can
escape from the surface
 High energy electrons (elastic
scattering)
 Fewer BSE than SE
 We differentiate between BSE1 and
BSE2
BSE vs SE
SE produces higher resolution
images than BSE
By placing the secondary
electron detector inside the
lens, mainly SE1 are detected
Resolution of 1 – 2 nm is
possible
X-rays
 Photons not electrons
 Each element has a fingerprint
X-ray signal
 Poorer spatial resolution than
BSE and SE
 Relatively few X-ray signals are
emitted and the detector is
inefficient
 relatively long signal
collecting times are needed
Some comments on resolution
 Best resolution that can be obtained: size of the
electron spot on the sample surface
 The introduction of FEG has dramatically improved the
resolution of SEM’s
 The volume from which the signal electrons are
formed defines the resolution
 SE image has higher resolution than a BSE image
 Scanning speed:
 a weak signal requires slow speed to improve signal-to-
noise ratio
 when doing a slow scan drift in the electron beam can
affect the accuracy of the analysis
Resolution
We can also improve the resolution by:
1. Beam Accelerating Voltage(kv)
2. Probe convergence angle ap
3. Probe current ip
4. Probe diameter or spot size dp
5. Increasing strength of condenser lens
6. Decreasing the size of objective aperture
7. Decreasing the working distance
Sem   mahfooz
Effect of Accelerating Voltage
Figure 4. The above images were taken at different accelerating voltages, notice
how the resolution is improved with increased accelerating voltage [6].
Figure 5. The above images were taken at different accelerating voltages, notice
how the resolution is improved with increased accelerating voltage [6].
Effect of accelerating voltage
Figure 6. The above images were taken at different accelerating voltages, notice how the resolution is
improved with increased accelerating voltage [6].
Cont..
Figure 7. The above images were taken at two different working distances, notice how the depth of field
increases with working distance [6].
Effect of working distance
Effect of spot size/ probe dia
Figure 8. The above images were taken with two different size spot sizes.Notice how much the depth of field is
improved in the 200 micron spot size image [6].
References
 Fundamentals of materials Science and Engineering – William D. Callister
 Physical Metallurgy – Robert W. Cahn
 Physical Metallurgy and Advanced Materials – R. E. Smallman
 Physical Metallurgy Principles – Robert E. Reedhill
 http://en.wikipedia.org/scanning_electron_microscope
 JEOL. Guide to scanning electron Microscopy [Online]. Available at
http://www.jeol.com/sem/docs/sem_guide/tbcontd.html (accessed 1 Feb
2005).
Thank you

More Related Content

PPT
Scanning Electron Microscopy
PPTX
Electron microscopy
PPTX
Scanning electron microscopy
PPTX
Scanning electron microscopy
PPTX
Electron microscopy
PPTX
Transmission electron microscopy (1) (1)
PPTX
Electron microscopy
PPT
SEM and TEM
Scanning Electron Microscopy
Electron microscopy
Scanning electron microscopy
Scanning electron microscopy
Electron microscopy
Transmission electron microscopy (1) (1)
Electron microscopy
SEM and TEM

What's hot (19)

PPTX
Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) lecture
PPTX
Sem md ppt
PDF
Transmission electron microscope (TEM)
PPTX
Auger electron spectroscopy
PPTX
auger electron spectroscopy (AES)
PPTX
Auger effect. puplic
PDF
Xps (x ray photoelectron spectroscopy)
PPT
Sem Poster
PDF
Scanning Electron Microscopy
PDF
ELECTRON MICROSCOPE
PPTX
Nuclear magnetic resonance
PPTX
X ray photoelectron spectroscopy
PPT
Aes
PDF
X ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)
PPTX
X ray photoelecton spectroscopy
PPTX
Auger electron spectroscopy
PPT
Background Theory Class Resource
PPTX
Photomultiplier tubes
PDF
Xps - X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy
Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) lecture
Sem md ppt
Transmission electron microscope (TEM)
Auger electron spectroscopy
auger electron spectroscopy (AES)
Auger effect. puplic
Xps (x ray photoelectron spectroscopy)
Sem Poster
Scanning Electron Microscopy
ELECTRON MICROSCOPE
Nuclear magnetic resonance
X ray photoelectron spectroscopy
Aes
X ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)
X ray photoelecton spectroscopy
Auger electron spectroscopy
Background Theory Class Resource
Photomultiplier tubes
Xps - X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy
Ad

Similar to Sem mahfooz (20)

PPT
overview on scanning electron microscope
PPTX
Scanning electron microscope (sem)
PPT
SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPE MITHILESH CHOUDHARY
PDF
SEM,TEM & AFM
PDF
Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) Analysis.pdf
PDF
Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)
PPTX
Scanning Electron Microscopy Advantages, Application and Disadvantages
PPTX
SEM-for MS.pptx
PPTX
Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM 2013).pptx
PPTX
Scanning and Transmission Electron Microscope
PPTX
scanning electron microscope (SEM)
PPTX
scanning electron microscope for analysis
PPTX
Scanning electron microscopy
PPTX
Scanning electron microscopy mubbu
PDF
Dr nh mat.char notes
PPTX
Scanning Electron Microscopy - SEM
PPTX
Chapter-3. Electron Microscopy.pptx
PPTX
Microscoy description by praveen
PPT
2018 HM-scanning electron microscope
overview on scanning electron microscope
Scanning electron microscope (sem)
SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPE MITHILESH CHOUDHARY
SEM,TEM & AFM
Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) Analysis.pdf
Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)
Scanning Electron Microscopy Advantages, Application and Disadvantages
SEM-for MS.pptx
Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM 2013).pptx
Scanning and Transmission Electron Microscope
scanning electron microscope (SEM)
scanning electron microscope for analysis
Scanning electron microscopy
Scanning electron microscopy mubbu
Dr nh mat.char notes
Scanning Electron Microscopy - SEM
Chapter-3. Electron Microscopy.pptx
Microscoy description by praveen
2018 HM-scanning electron microscope
Ad

More from Mahfooz Alam (20)

PDF
Design of AC system for a Multiplex
PDF
Design of AC system for Multiplex
PPTX
Design of HVAC system for Multiplex
PPT
Xrd mahfooz
PPTX
Super mahfooz
PPTX
Sem mahfooz
PPTX
Sem mahfooz
PPTX
Pvd final 17 etmm10 mahfooz
PPTX
Mahfooz eta
PPTX
mahfooz_toughness of finegrained copper
PPTX
mahfooz_ supercapacitor
PPTX
mahfooz_pulsed electrodeposition technology
PPT
mahfooz_piezoelectricity
PPTX
mahfooz_materials for h2 storage
PPTX
mahfooz_laser
PPTX
mahfooz_inhibition of stress corrosion cracking in stainless steels
PPTX
mahfooz_hall-petch-effect-in-bulk-nanostructured-material
PPTX
mahfooz _graphene
PPTX
mahfooz galvonic corossion
PPTX
mahfooz_deformation in cryst_al
Design of AC system for a Multiplex
Design of AC system for Multiplex
Design of HVAC system for Multiplex
Xrd mahfooz
Super mahfooz
Sem mahfooz
Sem mahfooz
Pvd final 17 etmm10 mahfooz
Mahfooz eta
mahfooz_toughness of finegrained copper
mahfooz_ supercapacitor
mahfooz_pulsed electrodeposition technology
mahfooz_piezoelectricity
mahfooz_materials for h2 storage
mahfooz_laser
mahfooz_inhibition of stress corrosion cracking in stainless steels
mahfooz_hall-petch-effect-in-bulk-nanostructured-material
mahfooz _graphene
mahfooz galvonic corossion
mahfooz_deformation in cryst_al

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
CARTOGRAPHY AND GEOINFORMATION VISUALIZATION chapter1 NPTE (2).pptx
PPTX
M Tech Sem 1 Civil Engineering Environmental Sciences.pptx
PDF
Human-AI Collaboration: Balancing Agentic AI and Autonomy in Hybrid Systems
PDF
BIO-INSPIRED HORMONAL MODULATION AND ADAPTIVE ORCHESTRATION IN S-AI-GPT
PDF
Enhancing Cyber Defense Against Zero-Day Attacks using Ensemble Neural Networks
PPT
Mechanical Engineering MATERIALS Selection
PPTX
Current and future trends in Computer Vision.pptx
PDF
Automation-in-Manufacturing-Chapter-Introduction.pdf
PDF
A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF APPLICATIONS IN FRAUD DETECTION
PDF
Level 2 – IBM Data and AI Fundamentals (1)_v1.1.PDF
PDF
Mitigating Risks through Effective Management for Enhancing Organizational Pe...
PDF
keyrequirementskkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
PPTX
Geodesy 1.pptx...............................................
PDF
BMEC211 - INTRODUCTION TO MECHATRONICS-1.pdf
PPT
Project quality management in manufacturing
PPTX
CYBER-CRIMES AND SECURITY A guide to understanding
PDF
Mohammad Mahdi Farshadian CV - Prospective PhD Student 2026
PDF
Artificial Superintelligence (ASI) Alliance Vision Paper.pdf
PPT
introduction to datamining and warehousing
PPT
Introduction, IoT Design Methodology, Case Study on IoT System for Weather Mo...
CARTOGRAPHY AND GEOINFORMATION VISUALIZATION chapter1 NPTE (2).pptx
M Tech Sem 1 Civil Engineering Environmental Sciences.pptx
Human-AI Collaboration: Balancing Agentic AI and Autonomy in Hybrid Systems
BIO-INSPIRED HORMONAL MODULATION AND ADAPTIVE ORCHESTRATION IN S-AI-GPT
Enhancing Cyber Defense Against Zero-Day Attacks using Ensemble Neural Networks
Mechanical Engineering MATERIALS Selection
Current and future trends in Computer Vision.pptx
Automation-in-Manufacturing-Chapter-Introduction.pdf
A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF APPLICATIONS IN FRAUD DETECTION
Level 2 – IBM Data and AI Fundamentals (1)_v1.1.PDF
Mitigating Risks through Effective Management for Enhancing Organizational Pe...
keyrequirementskkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
Geodesy 1.pptx...............................................
BMEC211 - INTRODUCTION TO MECHATRONICS-1.pdf
Project quality management in manufacturing
CYBER-CRIMES AND SECURITY A guide to understanding
Mohammad Mahdi Farshadian CV - Prospective PhD Student 2026
Artificial Superintelligence (ASI) Alliance Vision Paper.pdf
introduction to datamining and warehousing
Introduction, IoT Design Methodology, Case Study on IoT System for Weather Mo...

Sem mahfooz

  • 1. SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPE Course instructor Dr Venkata Girish Kotnur Assistant Professor University of Hyderabad Presented by Mahfooz Alam M.TECH. 17ETMM10
  • 2. History  TEM constructed in 1931 by Max Knoll and Ernst Ruska  Ruska was awarded the Nobel Prize in physics for the development of transmission electron microscopy  Von Ardenne first STEM in 1938 by rastering the electron beam in a TEM  Zworykin et al. 1942, first SEM for bulk samples  Manfred von Ardenne who in 1937 invented a true SEM  1965 first commercial SEM by Cambridge Scientific Instruments Resolution at that time ~ 50 nm : Today < 1 nm Morphology only at that time : Today analytical instrument
  • 3. What is SEM?  It is a microscope that produces an image by using an electron beam that scans the surface of a specimen inside a vacuum chamber. What can we study in a SEM? • Topography and morphology • Chemistry • Crystallography • Orientation of grains • In-situ experiments: – Reactions with atmosphere – Effects of temperature “Easy” sample preparation!! “Big” samples!
  • 4. What does it looks like…. AFM Cantilever Tip Ant Head Blood Cells Diamond Thin Film (Numerous Multifaceted Micro- crystals) Microstructure of a plain carbon steel that contains 0.44 wt% of carbon Calcium Phosphate Crystal
  • 6. Components of the Instrument • electron gun (filament) • electromagnetic optics • scan coils • sample stage • detectors • vacuum system • computer hardware and software
  • 7. Electron Guns  We want many electrons per time unit per area (high current density) and as small electron spot as possible  Traditional guns: thermionic electron gun (electrons are emitted when a solid is heated)  W-wire, LaB6-crystal  Modern: field emission guns (FEG) (cold guns, a strong electric field is used to extract electrons)  Single crystal of W, etched to a thin tip
  • 8. Detectors Secondary electron detector: (Everhart-Thornley) Backscattered electron detector: (Solid-State Detector)  Secondary electrons: Everhart-Thornley Detector  Backscattered electrons: Solid State Detector  X-rays: Energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS)
  • 9. HOW THE SEM WORKS?  The SEM uses electrons instead of light to form an image.  A beam of electrons is produced at the top of the microscope by heating of a metallic filament.  The electron beam follows a vertical path through the column of the microscope. It makes its way through electromagnetic lenses which focus and direct the beam down towards the sample.  Once it hits the sample, other electrons ( backscattered or secondary ) are ejected from the sample. Detectors collect the secondary or backscattered electrons, and convert them to a signal that is sent to a viewing screen similar to the one in an ordinary television, producing an image.
  • 10. How do we get an image? 156 electrons! Image Detector Electron gun 288 electrons!
  • 11. Electron beam-sample interactions  The incident electron beam is scattered in the sample, both elastically and inelastically  This gives rise to various signals that we can detect (more on that on next slide)  Interaction volume increases with increasing acceleration voltage and decreases with increasing atomic number
  • 12. Signals from the sample Incoming electrons Secondary electrons Backscattered electrons Auger electrons X-rays Cathodo- luminescence (light) Sample
  • 13. Where does the signals come from? • Diameter of the interaction volume is larger than the electron spot  resolution is poorer than the size of the electron spot
  • 14. Secondary electrons (SE)  Generated from the collision between the incoming electrons and the loosely bonded outer electrons  Low energy electrons (~10-50 eV)  Only SE generated close to surface escape (topographic information is obtained)  Number of SE is greater than the number of incoming electrons  We differentiate between SE1 and SE2
  • 15. SE1  The secondary electrons that are generated by the incoming electron beam as they enter the surface  High resolution signal with a resolution which is only limited by the electron beam diameter SE2  The secondary electrons that are generated by the backscattered electrons that have returned to the surface after several inelastic scattering events  SE2 come from a surface area that is bigger than the spot from the incoming electrons  resolution is poorer than for SE1 exclusively Sample surface Incoming electrons SE2
  • 16. Backscattered electrons (BSE)  A fraction of the incident electrons is retarded by the electro-magnetic field of the nucleus and if the scattering angle is greater than 180° the electron can escape from the surface  High energy electrons (elastic scattering)  Fewer BSE than SE  We differentiate between BSE1 and BSE2
  • 17. BSE vs SE SE produces higher resolution images than BSE By placing the secondary electron detector inside the lens, mainly SE1 are detected Resolution of 1 – 2 nm is possible
  • 18. X-rays  Photons not electrons  Each element has a fingerprint X-ray signal  Poorer spatial resolution than BSE and SE  Relatively few X-ray signals are emitted and the detector is inefficient  relatively long signal collecting times are needed
  • 19. Some comments on resolution  Best resolution that can be obtained: size of the electron spot on the sample surface  The introduction of FEG has dramatically improved the resolution of SEM’s  The volume from which the signal electrons are formed defines the resolution  SE image has higher resolution than a BSE image  Scanning speed:  a weak signal requires slow speed to improve signal-to- noise ratio  when doing a slow scan drift in the electron beam can affect the accuracy of the analysis
  • 20. Resolution We can also improve the resolution by: 1. Beam Accelerating Voltage(kv) 2. Probe convergence angle ap 3. Probe current ip 4. Probe diameter or spot size dp 5. Increasing strength of condenser lens 6. Decreasing the size of objective aperture 7. Decreasing the working distance
  • 22. Effect of Accelerating Voltage Figure 4. The above images were taken at different accelerating voltages, notice how the resolution is improved with increased accelerating voltage [6].
  • 23. Figure 5. The above images were taken at different accelerating voltages, notice how the resolution is improved with increased accelerating voltage [6]. Effect of accelerating voltage
  • 24. Figure 6. The above images were taken at different accelerating voltages, notice how the resolution is improved with increased accelerating voltage [6]. Cont..
  • 25. Figure 7. The above images were taken at two different working distances, notice how the depth of field increases with working distance [6]. Effect of working distance
  • 26. Effect of spot size/ probe dia Figure 8. The above images were taken with two different size spot sizes.Notice how much the depth of field is improved in the 200 micron spot size image [6].
  • 27. References  Fundamentals of materials Science and Engineering – William D. Callister  Physical Metallurgy – Robert W. Cahn  Physical Metallurgy and Advanced Materials – R. E. Smallman  Physical Metallurgy Principles – Robert E. Reedhill  http://en.wikipedia.org/scanning_electron_microscope  JEOL. Guide to scanning electron Microscopy [Online]. Available at http://www.jeol.com/sem/docs/sem_guide/tbcontd.html (accessed 1 Feb 2005).