SlideShare a Scribd company logo
15th November, 2017
Presented By:
Name: Rajib Kumar Roy
ID No: 1302002
Reg No: 04176
Session: 2013-14
A Presentation on
Using Social Networking Technology to Enhance
Learning in Higher Education: A Case Study using
Facebook.
 Technology Enhance learning(TEL)
 Benefits of using Technology for learning
 Relationship Between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0
 Communities of Practice
 Social Networking Technology in Academia
 Experimental Study
 Feedback & Proposed Features
 Conclusion
Overview
2
 Referred to as learning with
technology.
 A learning process or environment
that is supported by the use of
educational, virtual and online
communication technologies.
 To maximize the student learning
experience.
 Promote students to communicate,
collaborate and share their
knowledge with others through
technologies.
Technology Enhance Learning(TEL)
3
 Connectivity toinformation and to others.
 Greaterchoice overthe time,place and pace of study.
 Users can interact betterwith educator in learning environment.
 Knowledge-sharing and co-authoring across multiple locations.
 More active learning by means of interactive technologies and
multimediaresources.
 Participation in communities of knowledge ,inquiry and learning.
Benefits of using technologies for learning
4
 “Readable” phrase of the world
wideweb with “flat data”.
 Web 1.0 is static.
 Limited interaction between sites
and web users.
 Users passively receive information
without being given the
opportunity to post reviews
,commentsand feedback
Relationship between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0
 “Writable” phrase of the world wide
web with “interactive data”.
 Web 2.0 is dynamic
 It allows users to interact more freely
to each other and also with sites.
 Web 2.0 encourages participation,
collaboration and information
sharing.
 Web 2.0 represents the cumulative
changes.
 Examples: facebook,youtube,Twitter.
5
Communities of Practice
 Group of people who share a
concern or a passion for something
they do and learn how to do it
betteras they interact regularly.
 Three characteristics; the domain,
the communityand the practice.
6
 Content Management System(CMS)
 Sakai
 Media-sharing Websites(Youtube,Flickr)
 Podcast
 Blog(weblog)
 WebCT
 E-book
 Portable Document Format(pdf)
 Chat
Social Networking Technology in Academia
7
 The main two features of web 2.0 technology are; first is user recognize
the web at first , a service delivery platform and second, as the
collective wisdom of the crowd. “Facebook” is a strong example of
this phenomenon.
The system classified into five groups:
i) Learning Facilitators(LF)
ii)ActiveParticipants(AP)
iii) Learning Assistant(LA)
iv) Observers(O)
v) Friends of the Community(FOC)
Experimental Study
8
 Most popular activity occurred in
comment section.
 Discussion also had a high amount of
activity.
 Posting photo was also a popular
activity.
 Highest amount of activity(discussion
and comments) occurred in a
specific busy time.
Experimental Study(continu….)
9
 78% of the students think it’s useful to
use Facebook as a supplemental
learning technology for their class.
 Only 55% think that Facebook helped
them in learning.
Feedback & proposed features
10
Thanks to all
11

More Related Content

DOCX
Report Of Web2 Application
PPT
1. web 2.0 and education certificate of emerging technologies
DOCX
Defusion technology part a
PPT
Web 2.0 Imagine
PPTX
497410347 web2.0
PPT
Design and Development of Personal Learning Environment for Higher Education
PPT
MyCommunity Demo Introduction
PPT
Report Of Web2 Application
1. web 2.0 and education certificate of emerging technologies
Defusion technology part a
Web 2.0 Imagine
497410347 web2.0
Design and Development of Personal Learning Environment for Higher Education
MyCommunity Demo Introduction

What's hot (19)

PPTX
How to use facebook in the college classroom
PPT
Social media for learning
PPT
PresentacióN1 Web 2.0 Applications
PPT
Web 2.0 and higher ed
PPTX
Language teachers’ technology professional development
PPT
Social networking for educators
PPT
AccessACE workshop by Delia Bradshaw
PPT
Web 2.0 Skills
PDF
ELT-technology
PPT
Namaganda
PPT
how to introduce web 2.0 to n00bs
PPT
If They Build It They Will Come
PPT
To use or not to use web 2.0 in higher education?
 
PPT
DC Tech and Humanities talk
PDF
Web 2.0 A1 Poster for IIDeL2014
PPTX
CeCC Web 2.0 Examples
PPTX
Web 2.0: Innovating Teaching and Learning in Higher Education
PPT
web 2.0
PPT
Social Software and Informal Learning
How to use facebook in the college classroom
Social media for learning
PresentacióN1 Web 2.0 Applications
Web 2.0 and higher ed
Language teachers’ technology professional development
Social networking for educators
AccessACE workshop by Delia Bradshaw
Web 2.0 Skills
ELT-technology
Namaganda
how to introduce web 2.0 to n00bs
If They Build It They Will Come
To use or not to use web 2.0 in higher education?
 
DC Tech and Humanities talk
Web 2.0 A1 Poster for IIDeL2014
CeCC Web 2.0 Examples
Web 2.0: Innovating Teaching and Learning in Higher Education
web 2.0
Social Software and Informal Learning
Ad

Similar to Social networking technology to enhance learning a case study (20)

PDF
A05430107
PPT
Social Networking
PDF
Using New Media for Educational Support in Higher Education: A Comparative An...
PDF
PDF
The%20 use%20of%20social%20networking%20in%20education%20challenges%20and%20o...
PPT
Social web and language learning
DOCX
Conole southampton
PPT
Social Networking in Education
DOC
Chapter 4 open, social and participatory media
PDF
DOC
2 09 groinne conole_july_final_2011
PDF
Using Social Media in Higher Education
DOC
Chapter 1
PDF
Social Software and Participatory Learning: Pedagogical Choices with Technolo...
PPTX
User perspectives on open, social network-based (language) learning and teaching
DOC
Conole dehub paper_april
DOC
Final conole southampton
PPT
Network Ethics Conference, Lisbon
PPT
Hea.Keynote
PPT
FYS Spring Retreat
A05430107
Social Networking
Using New Media for Educational Support in Higher Education: A Comparative An...
The%20 use%20of%20social%20networking%20in%20education%20challenges%20and%20o...
Social web and language learning
Conole southampton
Social Networking in Education
Chapter 4 open, social and participatory media
2 09 groinne conole_july_final_2011
Using Social Media in Higher Education
Chapter 1
Social Software and Participatory Learning: Pedagogical Choices with Technolo...
User perspectives on open, social network-based (language) learning and teaching
Conole dehub paper_april
Final conole southampton
Network Ethics Conference, Lisbon
Hea.Keynote
FYS Spring Retreat
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
climate analysis of Dhaka ,Banglades.pptx
PPTX
ALIMENTARY AND BILIARY CONDITIONS 3-1.pptx
PPT
Quality review (1)_presentation of this 21
PPTX
iec ppt-1 pptx icmr ppt on rehabilitation.pptx
PPTX
mbdjdhjjodule 5-1 rhfhhfjtjjhafbrhfnfbbfnb
PDF
“Getting Started with Data Analytics Using R – Concepts, Tools & Case Studies”
PDF
Clinical guidelines as a resource for EBP(1).pdf
PPTX
Major-Components-ofNKJNNKNKNKNKronment.pptx
PPTX
STUDY DESIGN details- Lt Col Maksud (21).pptx
PDF
Recruitment and Placement PPT.pdfbjfibjdfbjfobj
PPTX
Acceptance and paychological effects of mandatory extra coach I classes.pptx
PDF
Galatica Smart Energy Infrastructure Startup Pitch Deck
PPTX
Business Ppt On Nestle.pptx huunnnhhgfvu
PPTX
CEE 2 REPORT G7.pptxbdbshjdgsgjgsjfiuhsd
PDF
Introduction to Business Data Analytics.
PPTX
Supervised vs unsupervised machine learning algorithms
PPTX
The THESIS FINAL-DEFENSE-PRESENTATION.pptx
PPTX
oil_refinery_comprehensive_20250804084928 (1).pptx
PDF
Lecture1 pattern recognition............
PDF
Foundation of Data Science unit number two notes
climate analysis of Dhaka ,Banglades.pptx
ALIMENTARY AND BILIARY CONDITIONS 3-1.pptx
Quality review (1)_presentation of this 21
iec ppt-1 pptx icmr ppt on rehabilitation.pptx
mbdjdhjjodule 5-1 rhfhhfjtjjhafbrhfnfbbfnb
“Getting Started with Data Analytics Using R – Concepts, Tools & Case Studies”
Clinical guidelines as a resource for EBP(1).pdf
Major-Components-ofNKJNNKNKNKNKronment.pptx
STUDY DESIGN details- Lt Col Maksud (21).pptx
Recruitment and Placement PPT.pdfbjfibjdfbjfobj
Acceptance and paychological effects of mandatory extra coach I classes.pptx
Galatica Smart Energy Infrastructure Startup Pitch Deck
Business Ppt On Nestle.pptx huunnnhhgfvu
CEE 2 REPORT G7.pptxbdbshjdgsgjgsjfiuhsd
Introduction to Business Data Analytics.
Supervised vs unsupervised machine learning algorithms
The THESIS FINAL-DEFENSE-PRESENTATION.pptx
oil_refinery_comprehensive_20250804084928 (1).pptx
Lecture1 pattern recognition............
Foundation of Data Science unit number two notes

Social networking technology to enhance learning a case study

  • 1. 15th November, 2017 Presented By: Name: Rajib Kumar Roy ID No: 1302002 Reg No: 04176 Session: 2013-14 A Presentation on Using Social Networking Technology to Enhance Learning in Higher Education: A Case Study using Facebook.
  • 2.  Technology Enhance learning(TEL)  Benefits of using Technology for learning  Relationship Between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0  Communities of Practice  Social Networking Technology in Academia  Experimental Study  Feedback & Proposed Features  Conclusion Overview 2
  • 3.  Referred to as learning with technology.  A learning process or environment that is supported by the use of educational, virtual and online communication technologies.  To maximize the student learning experience.  Promote students to communicate, collaborate and share their knowledge with others through technologies. Technology Enhance Learning(TEL) 3
  • 4.  Connectivity toinformation and to others.  Greaterchoice overthe time,place and pace of study.  Users can interact betterwith educator in learning environment.  Knowledge-sharing and co-authoring across multiple locations.  More active learning by means of interactive technologies and multimediaresources.  Participation in communities of knowledge ,inquiry and learning. Benefits of using technologies for learning 4
  • 5.  “Readable” phrase of the world wideweb with “flat data”.  Web 1.0 is static.  Limited interaction between sites and web users.  Users passively receive information without being given the opportunity to post reviews ,commentsand feedback Relationship between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0  “Writable” phrase of the world wide web with “interactive data”.  Web 2.0 is dynamic  It allows users to interact more freely to each other and also with sites.  Web 2.0 encourages participation, collaboration and information sharing.  Web 2.0 represents the cumulative changes.  Examples: facebook,youtube,Twitter. 5
  • 6. Communities of Practice  Group of people who share a concern or a passion for something they do and learn how to do it betteras they interact regularly.  Three characteristics; the domain, the communityand the practice. 6
  • 7.  Content Management System(CMS)  Sakai  Media-sharing Websites(Youtube,Flickr)  Podcast  Blog(weblog)  WebCT  E-book  Portable Document Format(pdf)  Chat Social Networking Technology in Academia 7
  • 8.  The main two features of web 2.0 technology are; first is user recognize the web at first , a service delivery platform and second, as the collective wisdom of the crowd. “Facebook” is a strong example of this phenomenon. The system classified into five groups: i) Learning Facilitators(LF) ii)ActiveParticipants(AP) iii) Learning Assistant(LA) iv) Observers(O) v) Friends of the Community(FOC) Experimental Study 8
  • 9.  Most popular activity occurred in comment section.  Discussion also had a high amount of activity.  Posting photo was also a popular activity.  Highest amount of activity(discussion and comments) occurred in a specific busy time. Experimental Study(continu….) 9
  • 10.  78% of the students think it’s useful to use Facebook as a supplemental learning technology for their class.  Only 55% think that Facebook helped them in learning. Feedback & proposed features 10