SlideShare a Scribd company logo
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 04 Issue: 07 | July -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
© 2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 732
Soil structure interaction of RC building with different foundations and
soil types
Suman1 , Dr.Sunil Kumar Tengali2
1 M.Tech Computer Aided Structural Engineering REVA University Bengaluru-560064, India
2 P.G.Co-ordinator, Computer Aided Structural Engineering REVA University Bengaluru-560066, India
------------------------------------------------------------------------***-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Abstract: Conventional structural design methods neglect
the Soil Structure Interaction (henceforth SSI) effects.
Ignoring of SSI is reasonable for light structures in relatively
hard soil such as low rise buildings and simple rigid
retaining walls. The effect of SSI, however, becomes very
dangerous for heavy structures resting on relatively soft
soils such as clay silt. Most of the designers do not consider
the soil structure interaction i.e. Soil layers and its
subsequent effect on structure during earthquakes. When a
structure is subjected to ground motion, coupling action
takes place at the foundation and overturning of structure
occurs, and thus changes the motion of the ground. By
considering soil-structure interaction, makes a structure
more strengthening and thus, increasing the natural period
of the structure compared to the corresponding rigidly
supported structure. The present work emphasizes the
importance of soil structure interaction in the analysis. To
study this effect, a G+7 storeyed building with vertical
irregularities located in zone IV is analyzed using SAP2000
by considering different soil properties and different types of
foundations. Conclusions will be drawn for the selection of
suitable foundation to avoid failure of the structure.
Key Words: Soil structure interaction, pile foundation, raft
foundation, time period, Maximum displacement.
Introduction:
The construction of high-rise building, medium height
buildings and small areas for usually used the pile and raft
Foundations to support the structure under the soft
grounds and reclaimed land. The normal conditions of soil
the building is subjected to lateral loads and moments due
to structural eccentricity of the footing. During an
earthquake, the Seismic waves circularize or pass through
soil layers then the additional bending moments are
developed in the pile and Raft due to kinematic loads
applied by the superstructure to substructures, as well as
deformation of the Surrounding soil. Both inertial loads
and soil deformation effects the ground acceleration
during an earthquake event. During strong earthquake two
effects on the pile and raft foundation, firstly pile behave
nonlinear as well as raft while surrounding soil is soft ,
secondly, large amount of inertia forces are generated in
the soil it cause the separation of sub-soil and footing so it
may causes the failure of the structure, so the study of soil
structure Interaction is one of the beneficial effects on the
seismic response of the building, it decreases the
frequency of the building , and also it increases the
flexibility of the building and story drift, lateral deflection
compared to the corresponding rigidly supported
structure.
Problem statement:
This paper analysis of vertical irregularity of building and
consideration of soil structure interaction under seismic
loading. Aimed with purpose, the vertical irregular
building (G+7) with pile foundation is analyzed by using
SAP 2000 subjected to the combination of gravity load and
seismic load under specific zone. Compare the same
building with raft foundation and consideration of soil
structure interaction; it is analyzed by using the SAP2000
software. Results are compared structural building with
and without soil structure interaction.
Objectives:
The based on previous case study deals with the effect of
soil structure interaction on RC building. The objective of
this present work is to study with and without soil
structure interaction effect of layered soil on structural
behavior of building supported on pile and raft foundation
when subjected to seismic load. During dynamic loading
the consideration of fixed support reduces the overall
strength of the structure and brings out changes in
frequency as well as natural time period of the structure.
So following objectives are determine to increasing the
time period of the building.
[1]The comparison between vertical irregular of building
supported by pile foundation with and without soil
structure interaction.
[2] The comparison between vertical irregular of building
supported by raft foundation with and without soil
structure interaction.
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 04 Issue: 07 | July -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
© 2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 733
Methodology:
RC frame structure supported by a pile and raft
foundations of two high rise buildings (G+7) this both the
buildings are designed by considering the with and
without soil structure interaction subjected to a seismic
forces. These buildings are analyzed by using the Response
spectrum method using SAP2000. Seismic analysis was
carried out by using the IS1893-2002 part 1.
[a]Input data for building: bay of 2*1 and its width is 4m
and length is 8m and height of the building is 24m, Size of
column is 400mm*1400mm and size of beam
400mm*800mm and slab thickness is 175mm,imposed
load 2KN/m2 floor, finish 1.5KN/m2, wall load
9.68KN/m2,wall thickness 200mm.[b]Input data for pile:
length of pile 8.2m,size concrete pile cap
size800mm*1400mm, pile groups1x1 for c-1,c-3,c-4,c-6
and 2x1 for c-2,c-5.
[c]Input data for raft: cross section 520mm*520mm, depth
of raft 800mm.
[d]Response spectrum data: Seismic zone factor 0.24,
damping ratio 0.05, soil type (2) medium,
In all models considered in plan of structural RC building,
same number of storeys for all the soil condition models
and using materials are also same for all models.
Soil layer properties for pile foundation.
The Pile foundation should be located at the down to the
refusal strata, in this paper depth of pile foundation is
considered as 8.2m.
Soil layer properties for pile foundation.
Depth Soil layer Young’s
modulus(K
N/m3)
Unit
weight
(KN/m
2)
Poisso
n’s
ratio
From
GL-2.8
clay silt 17.75 22*103 0.3
2.8-
3.8
Sandy
clay with
silt
17.75 22*103 0.3
3.8-5 Fine sand 18.5 24*103 0.3
5-7 Sandy
clay with
silt
17.75 22*103 0.3
7-6.8 Clay silt 17.75 17.75 22*103 0.3
6.8-
13.6
Clay silt
and hard
strata
17.75 17.75 22*103 0.3
Fig.1.Models of Pile foundation of RC building with and
without consideration of soil layer
Soil layer properties for raft foundation.
In this model depth of the raft foundation is 4.2m
Table 2: soil layer properties for raft foundation
Depth(
m)
Soil
layer
Young’s
modulus(KN
/m3)
Unit
weight(KN
/m2)
Poisso
n’s
ratio
0-2.8 Clay
silt
17.75 22*103 0.3
2.8-4.2 Sandyc
lay
with
silt
17.75 22*103 0.3
4.2 Fine
sand
18.5 24*103 0.3
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 04 Issue: 07 | July -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
© 2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 734
Fig.2.Models of raft foundation of RC building with and
without consideration of soil layer
Result and discussions:
The analysis of RC framed structure using SAP2000 has
been performed for different combinations of soil layer for
Pile and Raft foundations. To determining the time period,
Horizontal displacement, maximum displacement, storey
shear, and story drift at different storey level, by using the
Response spectrum analysis.
Type1 and Type 1.1 RC framed structure of pile foundation
with and without consideration of soil layer models
Type2- and Typ2.1- RC framed structure of raft foundation
with and without consideration of soil layer models.
[1] The comparison between vertical irregular of
building supported by pile foundation with and
without soil structure interaction.
1)Time period:
For the Strcture of Pile foundation model with and without
soil structure interaction models time period in sec
Table 3:No of mode v/s time period
Fig 3: No of mode v/s time period
Overall observing the time period for the pile foundation of
RC frame building with and without consideration of soil
layer, in that increasing the time period of the structure is
type 1 i.e. RC framed structure of pile foundation with soil
layer.
2) Maximum displacement:
The raft foundation of RC frame structure with and
without consideration of soil structure interaction model
displacement in y direction displacement (mm) is
tabulated
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1 3 5 7 9 11
Timeperiod
No of mode
TIME PERIOD
type1 Sec
type1.1 Sec
Mode No’s Type1 Type1.1
1 0.71254 0.697265
2 0.4042 0.403997
3 0.39979 0.389005
4 0.20046 0.201187
5 0.13875 0.136412
6 0.12865 0.129284
7 0.127131 0.127972
8 0.085936 0.080506
9 0.082447 0.078662
10 0.07914 0.067227
11 0.078903 0.066392
12 0.067097 0.052915
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 04 Issue: 07 | July -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
© 2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 735
Table4:Number of storey V/maximum displacement
Fig 4: No of storey v/s Displacement
From above graph shows the considering of soil structure
interaction displacement is7.39% times higher than the
without considering soil structure interaction of the model
i.e. type 1
[2]The comparison between vertical irregular of
building supported by raft foundation with and
without soil structure interaction
1) Time period:
The time period for the mat foundation of RC frame
structure with and without soil structure interaction in sec
Table 5: No of mode V/s Time period
Fig 5: No of mode v/s Time period
With consideration of soil layer model time period is
maximum i.e.9.5%than the type 2.1.
2)Maximum displacement:
The raft foundation of RC frame structure with and
without consideration of soil structure interaction model
displacement in y direction displacement (mm) is
tabulated
Table 6: Number of storey v/s displacement
No of storeys Type2 Type2.1
1
0.02038 0.51747
2
0.91485 1.65899
3
1.94455 2.67829
4
2.88252 3.60549
5
3.80138 4.53749
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Displacement
No of stories
Displacement for Y direction
type 1
type1.1
0
0.5
1
1.5
1 3 5 7 9 11
Timeperiod
No of modes
Time period
type2 Sec
type 2.1 Sec
No of
Storey’s
Type1 Type1.1
1 0.8293 0.7498
2 2.9595 2.8236
3 5.0911 4.8847
4 7.1115 6.8551
5 8.879 8.593
6 10.0685 9.7002
7 12.8979 12.0127
8 13.7978 12.8484
Mode
No’s
Type2 Type2.1
1 1.154432 1.258663
2 0.356193 0.416646
3 0.343799 0.39509
4 0.189451 0.211855
5 0.157322 0.163065
6 0.129431 0.140021
7 0.12337 0.139844
8 0.089241 0.099421
9 0.078835 0.08855
10 0.068761 0.078139
11 0.0598 0.064695
12 0.055515 0.057464
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 04 Issue: 07 | July -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
© 2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 736
6
4.68943 5.44962
7
5.89052 6.7461
8 6.3187 7.20957
Fig.6. No of mode V/s Time period
The raft foundation without consideration of soil structure
interaction shows the maximum displacement is 14.10%
of more than the with consideration of soil structure
interaction model.
The raft foundation of RC frame structure with
consideration soil structure interaction model is within the
permissible limit as per the IS 1893 part (1) 2002 clause
7.11.1.
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Displacement
No of stories
Displacement for y direction
Type 2
Type 2.1
Conclusion:
The pile foundation of RC frame structure with
consideration of SSI as per above discussion we observed
that the time period is increases and also it gives the more
flexibility for the building and frequency is decreases. In
case of raft foundation time period is decreases with
consideration of SSI due to presence of medium soil to soft
soil. And In case of pile foundation of RC frame structure
with consideration of SSI,displacement is more in above
the ground storey level .Very negligible displacement
below ground storey due to presence of consideration of
SSI in case of raft foundation RC frame structure with
consideration of SSI, displacement is minimum and
without consideration of soil layer model shows the
maximum displacement at above the ground storey but it
doesn’t exceeded the as per IS 1893-2002 part I so it is
feasible to improve the stiffness in elements by providing
infill or bracings.
References
[1]. S.Thusoo, K.Modi, R.Kumar, H.Madahar (2015) the
“Response of building with soil structure interaction with
varying soil types”.
[2]. P. Sharma, I. Pal Singh, Ankit (2014) “soil Structure
Interaction Effect on Asymmetrical building with shear
soil”.
[3].Er.Puneet Sharma et.al (2014) “The analysis of soil
structure interaction effects on asymmetrical RC Building
with shear wall by using STADD pro”
[4]. Sushma Pulikanti and Pradeep Kumar Ramancharla
(2014) “The effect of SSI Analysis of Framed structures
supported on pile foundation with and without interface
element”.

More Related Content

PDF
IRJET-Soil-Structure Effect of Multideck R.C.C. Structures
PDF
IRJET- Dynamic Analysis of RCC Building Considering Soil Structure Interaction
PDF
Soil Structure Interaction Effect for A Building Resting on Sloping Ground In...
PDF
Influence of stratified soil on seismic response of pile supported building
PDF
Effect of Soil Structure Interaction on Buildings with Mass Irregularity unde...
PDF
IRJET- https://www.irjet.net/archives/V6/i7/IRJET-V6I7339.pdf
PDF
Response of P.E.B with isolated footing considering SSI
PDF
Effect of foundation flexibility on dynamic behaviour of asymmetric building ...
IRJET-Soil-Structure Effect of Multideck R.C.C. Structures
IRJET- Dynamic Analysis of RCC Building Considering Soil Structure Interaction
Soil Structure Interaction Effect for A Building Resting on Sloping Ground In...
Influence of stratified soil on seismic response of pile supported building
Effect of Soil Structure Interaction on Buildings with Mass Irregularity unde...
IRJET- https://www.irjet.net/archives/V6/i7/IRJET-V6I7339.pdf
Response of P.E.B with isolated footing considering SSI
Effect of foundation flexibility on dynamic behaviour of asymmetric building ...

What's hot (20)

PDF
IRJET- The Effect of Soil-Structure Interaction on Raft Foundation
PDF
The Effect of Structure -Soil Interaction on Eccentrically Loaded Frame
PDF
Comparative and Parametric Study of Hillside Gateway Project of Irregular Str...
PDF
Finite element analysis of frame with soil structure interaction
PDF
EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON COIR FIBRE REINFORCED FLY ASH BASED GEOPOLYMER CONCRETE...
PDF
Ijciet 08 01_073
PDF
A review on: The influence of soil conditions on the seismic forces in RC bui...
PDF
Structure soil-structure interaction literature review
PDF
Effect of Soil Flexibility on Analysis and Design of Building
PDF
Effect of Planner Aspect Ratio on Vernacular Masonry Building under Earthquakes
PDF
#02080327-27-Time History Analysis of Sym and Unsym building (1)
PDF
International Journal of Engineering Research and Development
PDF
Seismic Behavior of RCC Frame Structure Considering Soil Structure Interaction
PDF
B012210512
PDF
IRJET- Investigations of Granular Pile Anchors in Granulated Soil Subject...
PDF
Comparative Study of Commercial High-Rise Building with Flat Slab by Varying ...
PDF
IRJET- Seismic Analysis of RCC Building Resting on Sloping Ground Adjacen...
PDF
EFFECT OF SOIL INTERACTION ON 3×3 BUILDING FRAME EMBEDDED IN MULTILAYERED SOIL
PDF
IRJET-Effects of Soil Structure Interaction on Infilled Building Frame with R...
PPTX
Comparative Study of the Seismic Response of Stone and Brick Masonry Buildings
IRJET- The Effect of Soil-Structure Interaction on Raft Foundation
The Effect of Structure -Soil Interaction on Eccentrically Loaded Frame
Comparative and Parametric Study of Hillside Gateway Project of Irregular Str...
Finite element analysis of frame with soil structure interaction
EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON COIR FIBRE REINFORCED FLY ASH BASED GEOPOLYMER CONCRETE...
Ijciet 08 01_073
A review on: The influence of soil conditions on the seismic forces in RC bui...
Structure soil-structure interaction literature review
Effect of Soil Flexibility on Analysis and Design of Building
Effect of Planner Aspect Ratio on Vernacular Masonry Building under Earthquakes
#02080327-27-Time History Analysis of Sym and Unsym building (1)
International Journal of Engineering Research and Development
Seismic Behavior of RCC Frame Structure Considering Soil Structure Interaction
B012210512
IRJET- Investigations of Granular Pile Anchors in Granulated Soil Subject...
Comparative Study of Commercial High-Rise Building with Flat Slab by Varying ...
IRJET- Seismic Analysis of RCC Building Resting on Sloping Ground Adjacen...
EFFECT OF SOIL INTERACTION ON 3×3 BUILDING FRAME EMBEDDED IN MULTILAYERED SOIL
IRJET-Effects of Soil Structure Interaction on Infilled Building Frame with R...
Comparative Study of the Seismic Response of Stone and Brick Masonry Buildings
Ad

Similar to Soil structure interaction of RC building with different foundations and soil types (20)

PDF
Effect of Soil Structure Interaction on Seismic Response of Multistorey Building
PDF
SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF RC STRUCTURE BY CONSIDERING SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTION (SSI)
PDF
Seismic Vulnerability of Plan Irregular RC Buildings with Soil-Structure Inte...
PDF
Effect of Soil Structure Interaction on Buildings with Stiffness Irregularity...
PDF
Effect of Positioning and Configuration of Shear Walls on Seismic Performance...
PDF
A Building Frame Experimental Study Supported On Piles
PDF
PERFORMANCE BASED ANALYSIS OF RC STRUCTURE WITH AND WITHOUT CONSIDERING SOIL ...
PDF
IRJET-Analysis and Seismic Response Reduction of Building using Base Isolatio...
PDF
IRJET- Comparative Analysis of Effects of Base Isolator & Fluid Viscous Dampe...
PDF
IRJET- Evaluation of R.C. Multi-Storey Building Response under the Effect of ...
PDF
IRJET- A Performance Study of Response of (G+20) Regular and Braced RC Buildi...
PDF
IRJET- Effect of Different Soil Conditions on Seismic Response of Multi-Store...
PDF
Inelastic seismic response of single-story structure in hilly areas owing to ...
PDF
Seismic Performance of Flat Slab Structures Under Static and Dynamic Loads
PDF
Seismic Analysis of Multistoreyed RC Building Due to Mass Irregularity by Tim...
PDF
Soil Structure effect on buildings: A review
PDF
Seismic Analysis of Multi Storied Irregular Building using Flat Slab and Gri...
PDF
Comparative Study of SMRF Structure in the Different Conditions of Soil: A Re...
PDF
Comparison of Soil Structure Interaction for Regular and Irregular Buildings ...
PDF
IRJET- Time History Analysis of Multi Story Building with and without Base Is...
Effect of Soil Structure Interaction on Seismic Response of Multistorey Building
SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF RC STRUCTURE BY CONSIDERING SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTION (SSI)
Seismic Vulnerability of Plan Irregular RC Buildings with Soil-Structure Inte...
Effect of Soil Structure Interaction on Buildings with Stiffness Irregularity...
Effect of Positioning and Configuration of Shear Walls on Seismic Performance...
A Building Frame Experimental Study Supported On Piles
PERFORMANCE BASED ANALYSIS OF RC STRUCTURE WITH AND WITHOUT CONSIDERING SOIL ...
IRJET-Analysis and Seismic Response Reduction of Building using Base Isolatio...
IRJET- Comparative Analysis of Effects of Base Isolator & Fluid Viscous Dampe...
IRJET- Evaluation of R.C. Multi-Storey Building Response under the Effect of ...
IRJET- A Performance Study of Response of (G+20) Regular and Braced RC Buildi...
IRJET- Effect of Different Soil Conditions on Seismic Response of Multi-Store...
Inelastic seismic response of single-story structure in hilly areas owing to ...
Seismic Performance of Flat Slab Structures Under Static and Dynamic Loads
Seismic Analysis of Multistoreyed RC Building Due to Mass Irregularity by Tim...
Soil Structure effect on buildings: A review
Seismic Analysis of Multi Storied Irregular Building using Flat Slab and Gri...
Comparative Study of SMRF Structure in the Different Conditions of Soil: A Re...
Comparison of Soil Structure Interaction for Regular and Irregular Buildings ...
IRJET- Time History Analysis of Multi Story Building with and without Base Is...
Ad

More from IRJET Journal (20)

PDF
Enhanced heart disease prediction using SKNDGR ensemble Machine Learning Model
PDF
Utilizing Biomedical Waste for Sustainable Brick Manufacturing: A Novel Appro...
PDF
Kiona – A Smart Society Automation Project
PDF
DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF BATTERY THERMAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM USING PHASE CHANG...
PDF
Invest in Innovation: Empowering Ideas through Blockchain Based Crowdfunding
PDF
SPACE WATCH YOUR REAL-TIME SPACE INFORMATION HUB
PDF
A Review on Influence of Fluid Viscous Damper on The Behaviour of Multi-store...
PDF
Wireless Arduino Control via Mobile: Eliminating the Need for a Dedicated Wir...
PDF
Explainable AI(XAI) using LIME and Disease Detection in Mango Leaf by Transfe...
PDF
BRAIN TUMOUR DETECTION AND CLASSIFICATION
PDF
The Project Manager as an ambassador of the contract. The case of NEC4 ECC co...
PDF
"Enhanced Heat Transfer Performance in Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers: A CFD ...
PDF
Advancements in CFD Analysis of Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers with Nanofluid...
PDF
Breast Cancer Detection using Computer Vision
PDF
Auto-Charging E-Vehicle with its battery Management.
PDF
Analysis of high energy charge particle in the Heliosphere
PDF
A Novel System for Recommending Agricultural Crops Using Machine Learning App...
PDF
Auto-Charging E-Vehicle with its battery Management.
PDF
Analysis of high energy charge particle in the Heliosphere
PDF
Wireless Arduino Control via Mobile: Eliminating the Need for a Dedicated Wir...
Enhanced heart disease prediction using SKNDGR ensemble Machine Learning Model
Utilizing Biomedical Waste for Sustainable Brick Manufacturing: A Novel Appro...
Kiona – A Smart Society Automation Project
DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF BATTERY THERMAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM USING PHASE CHANG...
Invest in Innovation: Empowering Ideas through Blockchain Based Crowdfunding
SPACE WATCH YOUR REAL-TIME SPACE INFORMATION HUB
A Review on Influence of Fluid Viscous Damper on The Behaviour of Multi-store...
Wireless Arduino Control via Mobile: Eliminating the Need for a Dedicated Wir...
Explainable AI(XAI) using LIME and Disease Detection in Mango Leaf by Transfe...
BRAIN TUMOUR DETECTION AND CLASSIFICATION
The Project Manager as an ambassador of the contract. The case of NEC4 ECC co...
"Enhanced Heat Transfer Performance in Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers: A CFD ...
Advancements in CFD Analysis of Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers with Nanofluid...
Breast Cancer Detection using Computer Vision
Auto-Charging E-Vehicle with its battery Management.
Analysis of high energy charge particle in the Heliosphere
A Novel System for Recommending Agricultural Crops Using Machine Learning App...
Auto-Charging E-Vehicle with its battery Management.
Analysis of high energy charge particle in the Heliosphere
Wireless Arduino Control via Mobile: Eliminating the Need for a Dedicated Wir...

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
PPT on Performance Review to get promotions
PDF
PRIZ Academy - 9 Windows Thinking Where to Invest Today to Win Tomorrow.pdf
PPTX
CYBER-CRIMES AND SECURITY A guide to understanding
PDF
Embodied AI: Ushering in the Next Era of Intelligent Systems
PPTX
Geodesy 1.pptx...............................................
DOCX
ASol_English-Language-Literature-Set-1-27-02-2023-converted.docx
PPTX
additive manufacturing of ss316l using mig welding
PPTX
UNIT 4 Total Quality Management .pptx
PPTX
Engineering Ethics, Safety and Environment [Autosaved] (1).pptx
PDF
Unit I ESSENTIAL OF DIGITAL MARKETING.pdf
PDF
Evaluating the Democratization of the Turkish Armed Forces from a Normative P...
PPTX
OOP with Java - Java Introduction (Basics)
PPTX
Current and future trends in Computer Vision.pptx
PDF
BMEC211 - INTRODUCTION TO MECHATRONICS-1.pdf
PPTX
web development for engineering and engineering
PDF
R24 SURVEYING LAB MANUAL for civil enggi
PPTX
Artificial Intelligence
PDF
SM_6th-Sem__Cse_Internet-of-Things.pdf IOT
PPTX
CARTOGRAPHY AND GEOINFORMATION VISUALIZATION chapter1 NPTE (2).pptx
PPTX
Internet of Things (IOT) - A guide to understanding
PPT on Performance Review to get promotions
PRIZ Academy - 9 Windows Thinking Where to Invest Today to Win Tomorrow.pdf
CYBER-CRIMES AND SECURITY A guide to understanding
Embodied AI: Ushering in the Next Era of Intelligent Systems
Geodesy 1.pptx...............................................
ASol_English-Language-Literature-Set-1-27-02-2023-converted.docx
additive manufacturing of ss316l using mig welding
UNIT 4 Total Quality Management .pptx
Engineering Ethics, Safety and Environment [Autosaved] (1).pptx
Unit I ESSENTIAL OF DIGITAL MARKETING.pdf
Evaluating the Democratization of the Turkish Armed Forces from a Normative P...
OOP with Java - Java Introduction (Basics)
Current and future trends in Computer Vision.pptx
BMEC211 - INTRODUCTION TO MECHATRONICS-1.pdf
web development for engineering and engineering
R24 SURVEYING LAB MANUAL for civil enggi
Artificial Intelligence
SM_6th-Sem__Cse_Internet-of-Things.pdf IOT
CARTOGRAPHY AND GEOINFORMATION VISUALIZATION chapter1 NPTE (2).pptx
Internet of Things (IOT) - A guide to understanding

Soil structure interaction of RC building with different foundations and soil types

  • 1. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056 Volume: 04 Issue: 07 | July -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072 © 2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 732 Soil structure interaction of RC building with different foundations and soil types Suman1 , Dr.Sunil Kumar Tengali2 1 M.Tech Computer Aided Structural Engineering REVA University Bengaluru-560064, India 2 P.G.Co-ordinator, Computer Aided Structural Engineering REVA University Bengaluru-560066, India ------------------------------------------------------------------------***----------------------------------------------------------------------- Abstract: Conventional structural design methods neglect the Soil Structure Interaction (henceforth SSI) effects. Ignoring of SSI is reasonable for light structures in relatively hard soil such as low rise buildings and simple rigid retaining walls. The effect of SSI, however, becomes very dangerous for heavy structures resting on relatively soft soils such as clay silt. Most of the designers do not consider the soil structure interaction i.e. Soil layers and its subsequent effect on structure during earthquakes. When a structure is subjected to ground motion, coupling action takes place at the foundation and overturning of structure occurs, and thus changes the motion of the ground. By considering soil-structure interaction, makes a structure more strengthening and thus, increasing the natural period of the structure compared to the corresponding rigidly supported structure. The present work emphasizes the importance of soil structure interaction in the analysis. To study this effect, a G+7 storeyed building with vertical irregularities located in zone IV is analyzed using SAP2000 by considering different soil properties and different types of foundations. Conclusions will be drawn for the selection of suitable foundation to avoid failure of the structure. Key Words: Soil structure interaction, pile foundation, raft foundation, time period, Maximum displacement. Introduction: The construction of high-rise building, medium height buildings and small areas for usually used the pile and raft Foundations to support the structure under the soft grounds and reclaimed land. The normal conditions of soil the building is subjected to lateral loads and moments due to structural eccentricity of the footing. During an earthquake, the Seismic waves circularize or pass through soil layers then the additional bending moments are developed in the pile and Raft due to kinematic loads applied by the superstructure to substructures, as well as deformation of the Surrounding soil. Both inertial loads and soil deformation effects the ground acceleration during an earthquake event. During strong earthquake two effects on the pile and raft foundation, firstly pile behave nonlinear as well as raft while surrounding soil is soft , secondly, large amount of inertia forces are generated in the soil it cause the separation of sub-soil and footing so it may causes the failure of the structure, so the study of soil structure Interaction is one of the beneficial effects on the seismic response of the building, it decreases the frequency of the building , and also it increases the flexibility of the building and story drift, lateral deflection compared to the corresponding rigidly supported structure. Problem statement: This paper analysis of vertical irregularity of building and consideration of soil structure interaction under seismic loading. Aimed with purpose, the vertical irregular building (G+7) with pile foundation is analyzed by using SAP 2000 subjected to the combination of gravity load and seismic load under specific zone. Compare the same building with raft foundation and consideration of soil structure interaction; it is analyzed by using the SAP2000 software. Results are compared structural building with and without soil structure interaction. Objectives: The based on previous case study deals with the effect of soil structure interaction on RC building. The objective of this present work is to study with and without soil structure interaction effect of layered soil on structural behavior of building supported on pile and raft foundation when subjected to seismic load. During dynamic loading the consideration of fixed support reduces the overall strength of the structure and brings out changes in frequency as well as natural time period of the structure. So following objectives are determine to increasing the time period of the building. [1]The comparison between vertical irregular of building supported by pile foundation with and without soil structure interaction. [2] The comparison between vertical irregular of building supported by raft foundation with and without soil structure interaction.
  • 2. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056 Volume: 04 Issue: 07 | July -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072 © 2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 733 Methodology: RC frame structure supported by a pile and raft foundations of two high rise buildings (G+7) this both the buildings are designed by considering the with and without soil structure interaction subjected to a seismic forces. These buildings are analyzed by using the Response spectrum method using SAP2000. Seismic analysis was carried out by using the IS1893-2002 part 1. [a]Input data for building: bay of 2*1 and its width is 4m and length is 8m and height of the building is 24m, Size of column is 400mm*1400mm and size of beam 400mm*800mm and slab thickness is 175mm,imposed load 2KN/m2 floor, finish 1.5KN/m2, wall load 9.68KN/m2,wall thickness 200mm.[b]Input data for pile: length of pile 8.2m,size concrete pile cap size800mm*1400mm, pile groups1x1 for c-1,c-3,c-4,c-6 and 2x1 for c-2,c-5. [c]Input data for raft: cross section 520mm*520mm, depth of raft 800mm. [d]Response spectrum data: Seismic zone factor 0.24, damping ratio 0.05, soil type (2) medium, In all models considered in plan of structural RC building, same number of storeys for all the soil condition models and using materials are also same for all models. Soil layer properties for pile foundation. The Pile foundation should be located at the down to the refusal strata, in this paper depth of pile foundation is considered as 8.2m. Soil layer properties for pile foundation. Depth Soil layer Young’s modulus(K N/m3) Unit weight (KN/m 2) Poisso n’s ratio From GL-2.8 clay silt 17.75 22*103 0.3 2.8- 3.8 Sandy clay with silt 17.75 22*103 0.3 3.8-5 Fine sand 18.5 24*103 0.3 5-7 Sandy clay with silt 17.75 22*103 0.3 7-6.8 Clay silt 17.75 17.75 22*103 0.3 6.8- 13.6 Clay silt and hard strata 17.75 17.75 22*103 0.3 Fig.1.Models of Pile foundation of RC building with and without consideration of soil layer Soil layer properties for raft foundation. In this model depth of the raft foundation is 4.2m Table 2: soil layer properties for raft foundation Depth( m) Soil layer Young’s modulus(KN /m3) Unit weight(KN /m2) Poisso n’s ratio 0-2.8 Clay silt 17.75 22*103 0.3 2.8-4.2 Sandyc lay with silt 17.75 22*103 0.3 4.2 Fine sand 18.5 24*103 0.3
  • 3. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056 Volume: 04 Issue: 07 | July -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072 © 2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 734 Fig.2.Models of raft foundation of RC building with and without consideration of soil layer Result and discussions: The analysis of RC framed structure using SAP2000 has been performed for different combinations of soil layer for Pile and Raft foundations. To determining the time period, Horizontal displacement, maximum displacement, storey shear, and story drift at different storey level, by using the Response spectrum analysis. Type1 and Type 1.1 RC framed structure of pile foundation with and without consideration of soil layer models Type2- and Typ2.1- RC framed structure of raft foundation with and without consideration of soil layer models. [1] The comparison between vertical irregular of building supported by pile foundation with and without soil structure interaction. 1)Time period: For the Strcture of Pile foundation model with and without soil structure interaction models time period in sec Table 3:No of mode v/s time period Fig 3: No of mode v/s time period Overall observing the time period for the pile foundation of RC frame building with and without consideration of soil layer, in that increasing the time period of the structure is type 1 i.e. RC framed structure of pile foundation with soil layer. 2) Maximum displacement: The raft foundation of RC frame structure with and without consideration of soil structure interaction model displacement in y direction displacement (mm) is tabulated 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 3 5 7 9 11 Timeperiod No of mode TIME PERIOD type1 Sec type1.1 Sec Mode No’s Type1 Type1.1 1 0.71254 0.697265 2 0.4042 0.403997 3 0.39979 0.389005 4 0.20046 0.201187 5 0.13875 0.136412 6 0.12865 0.129284 7 0.127131 0.127972 8 0.085936 0.080506 9 0.082447 0.078662 10 0.07914 0.067227 11 0.078903 0.066392 12 0.067097 0.052915
  • 4. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056 Volume: 04 Issue: 07 | July -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072 © 2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 735 Table4:Number of storey V/maximum displacement Fig 4: No of storey v/s Displacement From above graph shows the considering of soil structure interaction displacement is7.39% times higher than the without considering soil structure interaction of the model i.e. type 1 [2]The comparison between vertical irregular of building supported by raft foundation with and without soil structure interaction 1) Time period: The time period for the mat foundation of RC frame structure with and without soil structure interaction in sec Table 5: No of mode V/s Time period Fig 5: No of mode v/s Time period With consideration of soil layer model time period is maximum i.e.9.5%than the type 2.1. 2)Maximum displacement: The raft foundation of RC frame structure with and without consideration of soil structure interaction model displacement in y direction displacement (mm) is tabulated Table 6: Number of storey v/s displacement No of storeys Type2 Type2.1 1 0.02038 0.51747 2 0.91485 1.65899 3 1.94455 2.67829 4 2.88252 3.60549 5 3.80138 4.53749 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Displacement No of stories Displacement for Y direction type 1 type1.1 0 0.5 1 1.5 1 3 5 7 9 11 Timeperiod No of modes Time period type2 Sec type 2.1 Sec No of Storey’s Type1 Type1.1 1 0.8293 0.7498 2 2.9595 2.8236 3 5.0911 4.8847 4 7.1115 6.8551 5 8.879 8.593 6 10.0685 9.7002 7 12.8979 12.0127 8 13.7978 12.8484 Mode No’s Type2 Type2.1 1 1.154432 1.258663 2 0.356193 0.416646 3 0.343799 0.39509 4 0.189451 0.211855 5 0.157322 0.163065 6 0.129431 0.140021 7 0.12337 0.139844 8 0.089241 0.099421 9 0.078835 0.08855 10 0.068761 0.078139 11 0.0598 0.064695 12 0.055515 0.057464
  • 5. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056 Volume: 04 Issue: 07 | July -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072 © 2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 736 6 4.68943 5.44962 7 5.89052 6.7461 8 6.3187 7.20957 Fig.6. No of mode V/s Time period The raft foundation without consideration of soil structure interaction shows the maximum displacement is 14.10% of more than the with consideration of soil structure interaction model. The raft foundation of RC frame structure with consideration soil structure interaction model is within the permissible limit as per the IS 1893 part (1) 2002 clause 7.11.1. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Displacement No of stories Displacement for y direction Type 2 Type 2.1 Conclusion: The pile foundation of RC frame structure with consideration of SSI as per above discussion we observed that the time period is increases and also it gives the more flexibility for the building and frequency is decreases. In case of raft foundation time period is decreases with consideration of SSI due to presence of medium soil to soft soil. And In case of pile foundation of RC frame structure with consideration of SSI,displacement is more in above the ground storey level .Very negligible displacement below ground storey due to presence of consideration of SSI in case of raft foundation RC frame structure with consideration of SSI, displacement is minimum and without consideration of soil layer model shows the maximum displacement at above the ground storey but it doesn’t exceeded the as per IS 1893-2002 part I so it is feasible to improve the stiffness in elements by providing infill or bracings. References [1]. S.Thusoo, K.Modi, R.Kumar, H.Madahar (2015) the “Response of building with soil structure interaction with varying soil types”. [2]. P. Sharma, I. Pal Singh, Ankit (2014) “soil Structure Interaction Effect on Asymmetrical building with shear soil”. [3].Er.Puneet Sharma et.al (2014) “The analysis of soil structure interaction effects on asymmetrical RC Building with shear wall by using STADD pro” [4]. Sushma Pulikanti and Pradeep Kumar Ramancharla (2014) “The effect of SSI Analysis of Framed structures supported on pile foundation with and without interface element”.