Survey of Research Information
Management Practices
• Rebecca Bryant, OCLC Research
• Pablo de Castro, University of Strathclyde &
euroCRIS
• Anna Clements, University of St. Andrews &
euroCRIS
• Jan Fransen, University of Minnesota, Twin
Cities
• Julie Griffin, Virginia Tech
• Constance Malpas, OCLC Research
• Michele Mennielli, DuraSpace & euroCRIS
• Rachael Samberg, University of California,
Berkeley
• Survey launched 16 October
2017
• Results published in 2018
• Jointly implemented by OCLC
Research & euroCRIS
• Learn more at oc.lc/rim
This survey will help us understand and report on the state of
RIM activities worldwide, and it seeks answers to the following
questions:
• Why have institutions adopted--or are considering adopting--RIM
infrastructures? What are the principal drivers?
• How are institutions using RIM functionality? What are the principal uses?
• Who are institutional stakeholders, and what, in particular, is the role of
libraries?
• What processes and systems are in use? How do they interoperate with
internal and external systems? What is the scope?
• What are regional and international differences in drivers, uses, and
processes?
Survey goals
Survey seeks input from institutions at all
stages of RIM adoption
WHY?
We want to identify the different drivers for RIM
adoption worldwide
4
HOW?
We want to understand how institutions are USING RIM
functionality
5
• Who are the institutional stakeholders involved in RIM
adoption?
• What’s the specific role of the library?
• Staff resources?
• Outreach & education activities?
• Measures of success?
WHO?
Stakeholders & collaborators
6
• System(s) in use & when implemented
• Interoperability with internal & external systems
• Sources of publications metadata
• Use of persistent identifiers & vocabularies
• Which campus populations are included in the RIM?
• All disciplines?
• How many researchers are included?
WHAT?
Processes, systems, interoperability & scope
7
• Universities, research institutes, and other organizations supporting
research and research management
• Institutions should participate regardless of the status of RIM
implementation
–In production
–In process of implementation
–Exploring RIM options
• Only one survey per institution
Who should participate?
• Survey launches October 18
– Spanish language coming November, thanks to CONCYTEC
– Closes mid-January
• Survey results will be published in 2018 as an OCLC
Research report and made openly available to the
community. Survey data will be published CC-BY
Survey timeline
To learn more and complete the survey : oc.lc/rim
Survey of Research Information
Management Practices
• Rebecca Bryant, OCLC Research
• Pablo de Castro, University of Strathclyde &
euroCRIS
• Anna Clements, University of St. Andrews &
euroCRIS
• Jan Fransen, University of Minnesota, Twin
Cities
• Julie Griffin, Virginia Tech
• Constance Malpas, OCLC Research
• Michele Mennielli, DuraSpace & euroCRIS
• Rachael Samberg, University of California,
Berkeley
• Survey launched 16 October
2017
• Results published in 2018
• Jointly implemented by OCLC
Research & euroCRIS
• Learn more at oc.lc/rim

More Related Content

PPTX
RDMRose 2.6 Interviewing a researcher
PPTX
Borchardt NISO Altmetrics Dec
PDF
Certificate
PPTX
Open Educational Resources: Impact, Evidence & Narrative
PDF
Borchardt, How Can Libraries be Involved in Altmetrics?
PDF
Data analysis
PDF
Foundations of Data Analysis - Texas University Certificate
PPTX
Contextualized scientometrics: What's behind the numbers?
RDMRose 2.6 Interviewing a researcher
Borchardt NISO Altmetrics Dec
Certificate
Open Educational Resources: Impact, Evidence & Narrative
Borchardt, How Can Libraries be Involved in Altmetrics?
Data analysis
Foundations of Data Analysis - Texas University Certificate
Contextualized scientometrics: What's behind the numbers?

What's hot (20)

PPTX
New developments in the CWTS Leiden Ranking
PPTX
An in-depth bibliometric perspective on China’s scientific performance
PPTX
Science of science, scientometrics, and research policy: The need for quantit...
PPT
WEBOMETRICS 2010
PPTX
Crossref LIVE19 - Researcher and metadata user view
PPTX
Open science: Implications for bibliometrics and scientometrics
PPTX
Researching Open Education: A Systematic Review of GO-GN Theses
PPTX
Sustainability of GEPs and Networks in Research Funding Organisations
PPTX
Open citations: Next steps
PPTX
A scientometric perspective on university ranking
PPTX
Responsible use of university rankings
PPTX
Open Learning Analytics panel at Open Education Conference 2014
PDF
Young-Libraries and Public Access Policies
PPT
Research Evaluation: Is It Our Business Keynote
PPTX
The landscape of research on research
PPT
Delivering on the promise of a chemistry data repository for the world
PDF
Förvaltningsgemensam specifikation för forskningsmaterial och CERIF. Möjlighe...
PDF
20190527_Dietmar Lampert _ New indicators for Open Sciene
PPTX
Swimming upstream: libraries and open scholarship
New developments in the CWTS Leiden Ranking
An in-depth bibliometric perspective on China’s scientific performance
Science of science, scientometrics, and research policy: The need for quantit...
WEBOMETRICS 2010
Crossref LIVE19 - Researcher and metadata user view
Open science: Implications for bibliometrics and scientometrics
Researching Open Education: A Systematic Review of GO-GN Theses
Sustainability of GEPs and Networks in Research Funding Organisations
Open citations: Next steps
A scientometric perspective on university ranking
Responsible use of university rankings
Open Learning Analytics panel at Open Education Conference 2014
Young-Libraries and Public Access Policies
Research Evaluation: Is It Our Business Keynote
The landscape of research on research
Delivering on the promise of a chemistry data repository for the world
Förvaltningsgemensam specifikation för forskningsmaterial och CERIF. Möjlighe...
20190527_Dietmar Lampert _ New indicators for Open Sciene
Swimming upstream: libraries and open scholarship
Ad

Similar to Survey of Research Information Management Practices (20)

PPTX
The Emergence  of Research Information Management (RIM) within US Libraries
 
PDF
Bryant Confusing World of RIM
PDF
Making Sense of the Confusing World of Research Information Management
 
PDF
Adoption and Integration of Persistent Identifiers in European Research Infor...
PDF
2017 RIM Survey: discussion at the euroCRIS SMM Bratislava
PDF
Emerging Services for Research Informatio Management (RIM) through Enterprise...
 
PPTX
Research information management: making sense of it all
PPT
IR Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Institutional ...
PDF
BLC & Digital Science: Jonathan Breeze, Symplectic
PDF
Jonathan Breeze, Symplectic
PPT
Researchers Roadmaps Roles Reality Checks
PDF
UKOLN Programme Support for the JISC Research Information Management Programme
PPTX
But Were We Successful: Using Online Asynchronous Focus Groups to Evaluate Li...
PDF
The CRIS-Repository connection: possibilities and values – Ed Simons and Dani...
PDF
Models for integrating institutional repositories and research information ma...
PPT
UKOLN activities on research information management
PDF
Research Information Management
PPTX
Enhancing Interoperability: The Implementation of OpenAIRE Guidelines and COA...
PPT
February 2009 Working the IT/RIM Relationship Presentation by Helen Streck
PPSX
INNOVATION AND ‎RESEARCH (Digital Library ‎Information Access)‎
The Emergence  of Research Information Management (RIM) within US Libraries
 
Bryant Confusing World of RIM
Making Sense of the Confusing World of Research Information Management
 
Adoption and Integration of Persistent Identifiers in European Research Infor...
2017 RIM Survey: discussion at the euroCRIS SMM Bratislava
Emerging Services for Research Informatio Management (RIM) through Enterprise...
 
Research information management: making sense of it all
IR Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Institutional ...
BLC & Digital Science: Jonathan Breeze, Symplectic
Jonathan Breeze, Symplectic
Researchers Roadmaps Roles Reality Checks
UKOLN Programme Support for the JISC Research Information Management Programme
But Were We Successful: Using Online Asynchronous Focus Groups to Evaluate Li...
The CRIS-Repository connection: possibilities and values – Ed Simons and Dani...
Models for integrating institutional repositories and research information ma...
UKOLN activities on research information management
Research Information Management
Enhancing Interoperability: The Implementation of OpenAIRE Guidelines and COA...
February 2009 Working the IT/RIM Relationship Presentation by Helen Streck
INNOVATION AND ‎RESEARCH (Digital Library ‎Information Access)‎
Ad

More from OCLC (20)

PPTX
Communicating library impact beyond library walls: Findings from an action-or...
 
PPTX
"You can just tell whether a website looks reliable or not." People's modes o...
 
PPTX
Factors influencing research data management programs.
 
PPTX
Teaching research methods in LIS programs: Approaches, formats, and innovativ...
 
PPTX
OCLC ALISE Library & Information Science Research Grant Program
 
PPTX
Investing in library users and potential users: The Many Faces of Digital Vi...
 
PPTX
Academic library impact: Improving practice and essential areas to research
 
PPTX
Studying information behavior: The Many Faces of Digital Visitors and Residents
 
PPTX
Online engagement and information literacy: The Many Face of Digital Visitors...
 
PPTX
People's mode of online engagement: The Many Faces of Digital Visitors and R...
 
PPTX
Applying research methods: Investigating the Many Faces of Digital Visitors &...
 
PDF
OCLC RLP @ RLUK
 
PPTX
Using Qualitative Methods for Library Evaluation: An Interactive Workshop
 
PPTX
Visitors and Residents: The Hows and Whys of Engagement with Technology
 
PPTX
Action-Oriented Research Agenda on Library Contributions to Student Learning ...
 
PPTX
Visitors and Residents: Interactive Mapping Exercise Workshop
 
PPTX
The Library in the Life of the User
 
PPTX
Where are We Going and What Do We Do Next? Demonstrating the Value of Academi...
 
PPTX
Changing Tack: A Future-Focused ACRL Research Agenda
 
PPTX
Qualitative Research Methods in LIS
 
Communicating library impact beyond library walls: Findings from an action-or...
 
"You can just tell whether a website looks reliable or not." People's modes o...
 
Factors influencing research data management programs.
 
Teaching research methods in LIS programs: Approaches, formats, and innovativ...
 
OCLC ALISE Library & Information Science Research Grant Program
 
Investing in library users and potential users: The Many Faces of Digital Vi...
 
Academic library impact: Improving practice and essential areas to research
 
Studying information behavior: The Many Faces of Digital Visitors and Residents
 
Online engagement and information literacy: The Many Face of Digital Visitors...
 
People's mode of online engagement: The Many Faces of Digital Visitors and R...
 
Applying research methods: Investigating the Many Faces of Digital Visitors &...
 
OCLC RLP @ RLUK
 
Using Qualitative Methods for Library Evaluation: An Interactive Workshop
 
Visitors and Residents: The Hows and Whys of Engagement with Technology
 
Action-Oriented Research Agenda on Library Contributions to Student Learning ...
 
Visitors and Residents: Interactive Mapping Exercise Workshop
 
The Library in the Life of the User
 
Where are We Going and What Do We Do Next? Demonstrating the Value of Academi...
 
Changing Tack: A Future-Focused ACRL Research Agenda
 
Qualitative Research Methods in LIS
 

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
BP 704 T. NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS (UNIT 1)
PPTX
CHAPTER IV. MAN AND BIOSPHERE AND ITS TOTALITY.pptx
PPTX
Onco Emergencies - Spinal cord compression Superior vena cava syndrome Febr...
PDF
My India Quiz Book_20210205121199924.pdf
PPTX
Computer Architecture Input Output Memory.pptx
PDF
advance database management system book.pdf
PDF
Weekly quiz Compilation Jan -July 25.pdf
PDF
International_Financial_Reporting_Standa.pdf
PPTX
A powerpoint presentation on the Revised K-10 Science Shaping Paper
PDF
HVAC Specification 2024 according to central public works department
PDF
FOISHS ANNUAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 2025.pdf
PDF
CISA (Certified Information Systems Auditor) Domain-Wise Summary.pdf
PDF
Environmental Education MCQ BD2EE - Share Source.pdf
PDF
Chinmaya Tiranga quiz Grand Finale.pdf
PPTX
Unit 4 Computer Architecture Multicore Processor.pptx
PDF
Empowerment Technology for Senior High School Guide
PDF
1.3 FINAL REVISED K-10 PE and Health CG 2023 Grades 4-10 (1).pdf
PPTX
ELIAS-SEZIURE AND EPilepsy semmioan session.pptx
PDF
David L Page_DCI Research Study Journey_how Methodology can inform one's prac...
PPTX
20th Century Theater, Methods, History.pptx
BP 704 T. NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS (UNIT 1)
CHAPTER IV. MAN AND BIOSPHERE AND ITS TOTALITY.pptx
Onco Emergencies - Spinal cord compression Superior vena cava syndrome Febr...
My India Quiz Book_20210205121199924.pdf
Computer Architecture Input Output Memory.pptx
advance database management system book.pdf
Weekly quiz Compilation Jan -July 25.pdf
International_Financial_Reporting_Standa.pdf
A powerpoint presentation on the Revised K-10 Science Shaping Paper
HVAC Specification 2024 according to central public works department
FOISHS ANNUAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 2025.pdf
CISA (Certified Information Systems Auditor) Domain-Wise Summary.pdf
Environmental Education MCQ BD2EE - Share Source.pdf
Chinmaya Tiranga quiz Grand Finale.pdf
Unit 4 Computer Architecture Multicore Processor.pptx
Empowerment Technology for Senior High School Guide
1.3 FINAL REVISED K-10 PE and Health CG 2023 Grades 4-10 (1).pdf
ELIAS-SEZIURE AND EPilepsy semmioan session.pptx
David L Page_DCI Research Study Journey_how Methodology can inform one's prac...
20th Century Theater, Methods, History.pptx

Survey of Research Information Management Practices

  • 1. Survey of Research Information Management Practices • Rebecca Bryant, OCLC Research • Pablo de Castro, University of Strathclyde & euroCRIS • Anna Clements, University of St. Andrews & euroCRIS • Jan Fransen, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities • Julie Griffin, Virginia Tech • Constance Malpas, OCLC Research • Michele Mennielli, DuraSpace & euroCRIS • Rachael Samberg, University of California, Berkeley • Survey launched 16 October 2017 • Results published in 2018 • Jointly implemented by OCLC Research & euroCRIS • Learn more at oc.lc/rim
  • 2. This survey will help us understand and report on the state of RIM activities worldwide, and it seeks answers to the following questions: • Why have institutions adopted--or are considering adopting--RIM infrastructures? What are the principal drivers? • How are institutions using RIM functionality? What are the principal uses? • Who are institutional stakeholders, and what, in particular, is the role of libraries? • What processes and systems are in use? How do they interoperate with internal and external systems? What is the scope? • What are regional and international differences in drivers, uses, and processes? Survey goals
  • 3. Survey seeks input from institutions at all stages of RIM adoption
  • 4. WHY? We want to identify the different drivers for RIM adoption worldwide 4
  • 5. HOW? We want to understand how institutions are USING RIM functionality 5
  • 6. • Who are the institutional stakeholders involved in RIM adoption? • What’s the specific role of the library? • Staff resources? • Outreach & education activities? • Measures of success? WHO? Stakeholders & collaborators 6
  • 7. • System(s) in use & when implemented • Interoperability with internal & external systems • Sources of publications metadata • Use of persistent identifiers & vocabularies • Which campus populations are included in the RIM? • All disciplines? • How many researchers are included? WHAT? Processes, systems, interoperability & scope 7
  • 8. • Universities, research institutes, and other organizations supporting research and research management • Institutions should participate regardless of the status of RIM implementation –In production –In process of implementation –Exploring RIM options • Only one survey per institution Who should participate?
  • 9. • Survey launches October 18 – Spanish language coming November, thanks to CONCYTEC – Closes mid-January • Survey results will be published in 2018 as an OCLC Research report and made openly available to the community. Survey data will be published CC-BY Survey timeline To learn more and complete the survey : oc.lc/rim
  • 10. Survey of Research Information Management Practices • Rebecca Bryant, OCLC Research • Pablo de Castro, University of Strathclyde & euroCRIS • Anna Clements, University of St. Andrews & euroCRIS • Jan Fransen, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities • Julie Griffin, Virginia Tech • Constance Malpas, OCLC Research • Michele Mennielli, DuraSpace & euroCRIS • Rachael Samberg, University of California, Berkeley • Survey launched 16 October 2017 • Results published in 2018 • Jointly implemented by OCLC Research & euroCRIS • Learn more at oc.lc/rim