Task based language learning. old approach, new style. a new lesson to learn.

Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal

Sistema de Información Científica

Mónica Rodríguez-Bonces, Jeisson Rodríguez-Bonces
Task-Based Language Learning: Old Approach, New Style. A New Lesson to Learn
Profile Issues in Teachers´ Professional Development, vol. 12, núm. 2, -octubre, 2010, pp. 165-178,
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
Colombia
Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=169215620011

Profile Issues in Teachers´ Professional
Development,
ISSN (Printed Version): 1657-0790
rprofile_fchbog@unal.edu.co,
profile_journal@yahoo.com
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
Colombia

How to cite

Complete issue

More information about this article

Journal's homepage

www.redalyc.org
Non-Profit Academic Project, developed under the Open Acces Initiative

Task-Based Language Learning: Old Approach, New Style.
A New Lesson to Learn
Aprendizaje basado en tareas: un antiguo enfoque, un nuevo estilo.
Una nueva lección para aprender

Mónica Rodríguez-Bonces*

Universidad Central & ÚNICA, Colombia

Jeisson Rodríguez-Bonces**
Universidad Central & UNITEC, Colombia
This paper provides an overview of Task-Based Language Learning (TBL) and its use in the teach ing
and learning of foreign languages. It begins by defining the concept of TBL, followed by a presentation
of its framework and implications, and finally, a lesson plan based on TBL. The article presents an additional stage to be considered when planning a task-based lesson: the one of formal and informal assessment. The rubrics and a self-evaluation format appear as an additional constituent of any task cycle.
Key words: Task-based learning, framework, teach ers’ roles, students’ role.
Este artículo presenta una visión general del aprendizaje basado en tareas y su uso en la enseñanza y el
aprendizaje de las lenguas extranjeras. Comenzamos por definir el concepto de aprendizaje basado en
tareas, seguido por una presentación de sus fundamentos e implicaciones. Finalmente, presentamos
una lección fundamentada en el aprendizaje basado en tareas. El artículo presenta una fase adicional
cuando se planea una lección basada en tareas: la relacionada con la evaluación formal e informal. Así
mismo, se explica que una parte importante del enfoque por tareas es un componente de evaluación,
el cual debe contener rúbricas y un formato de autoevaluación.
Palabras clave: aprendizaje basado en tareas, fundamento, papel del docente, papel de los estudiantes.

*
**

E-mail: mrodriguezb2@ucentral.edu.co
E-mail: jeijeto@hotmail.com

This article was received on March 1, 2010, and accepted on July 20, 2010.

PROFILE Vol. 12, No. 2, October 2010. ISSN 1657-0790. Bogotá, Colombia. Pages 165-178

165

Rodríguez-Bonces & Rodríguez-Bonces

What Do We Mean by Task-Based
Learning?
Overview
Recently, the popularity of Task-Based Learning
(TBL) has made many researchers, teach ers, and
methodologists evaluate the effectiveness of this approach. Although it has been used for many years,
its popularity has increased. One of the main reasons for this attention is the desire of educators to
promote real communication or the exchange of
meanings rather than forms. Another reason for
such interest is the fact that practitioners advocate
better language learning when students are not focused only on linguistic forms. Researchers believe
there is less anxiety and learning is more effective if
language form per se is not the priority. If task-based
instruction takes place, language learning is more
meaningful and natural. The task is currently considered to be the most effective means of promoting
second language acquisition (SLA) in the classroom.
According to Richards and Rodgers (2004), “engaging learners in task work provides a better context
for the activation of learning processes” (p. 223).
These authors say the negotiation of meaning in
TBL provides the input and output necessary for
language acquisition.
If one wants to define a task, there is not a
single definition. Here are some examples of how
individuals in the field have characterized “task”.
Nunan (1989) considers a task as “a piece of classroom work which involves learners in comprehending, manipulating, producing or interacting
in the target language while their attention is
primarily focused on meaning rather than form”
(p. 10). According to this definition, students will
use prior knowledge in order to achieve their
goal; if any new information is needed (e.g. linguistic forms or vocabulary), the teach er will act
as a knower who provides it so that students do

166

not interrupt the process and achieve the expected
outcome. For Willis (1996) a task is an activity
“where the target language is used by the learner
for a communicative purpose (goal) in order to
achieve an outcome” (p. 23). It is more effective to
use a meaning-based approach than a form-based
approach. Students express their thoughts even if
some of the language is inaccurate. In this respect,
Skehan (1996) adds that tasks primarily focus on
meaning and resemble real-life situations. Since
tasks are goal-directed activities, participants decide which language forms to use to achieve the
goal. Van den Branden (2006) explains how in
second language research, tasks have been used
to study language production, interaction, negotiation of meaning –all aspects to improve second
language acquisition (SLA). This author defines a
task as “an activity in which a person engages in
order to attain an objective, and which necessitates the use of language” (p. 4). It is evident in this
definition that there is a language form needed to
perform a task; however, the language is the means
not the end. Language is the vehicle to reach successful communication when having real-life
communicative situations. Nowadays, the most
commonly used and widely accepted definition of
task is that of language activity in which there is a
focus on meaning. We define Task-Based Learning as an approach that requires teach ers to plan
lessons, not merely class activities, for real communication.
All the definitions given above share the idea
that tasks are goal-oriented activities and meaningcentered; tasks are designed to facilitate students’
participation in meaningful activities. Language
involves communication and this communication occurs only when the environment offers
the opportunity to exchange real and meaningful
thoughts. Some of the differences rely on the fact

Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Facultad de Ciencias Humanas, Departamento de Lenguas Extranjeras

Task-Based Language Learning Old Approach, New Style...

that a task has many purposes depending on the
student and teach ers’ needs.
Despite the fact that TBL emphasizes meaning,
form is not put aside. Each of the task models
have a period in class to focus on form which is
different from focusing on language as will be
explained later in this paper. For example, Willis and Willis (2007) focus on forms at the end of
each task cycle, which is defined as a sequence of
tasks related to one another. There are three reasons to focus on language form at the end of any
task sequence. First, learners understand language
within a context. When performing the task, students undoubtedly prepare and make use of language. Second, students focus their attention on
language use rather than language form. Each
task, during the cycle, has different purposes and
characteristics which capture the students’ attention and interest in the language that will be used
when achieving the target task. Third, students are
exposed to language production and reception.
Learners engage in real world activities that demand speaking and/or writing and understanding
by listening and/or read ing. In order for successful communication to take place, teach ers do not
have to correct every mistake. Teach ers have to see
language as a tool instead of an end, which means
that errors are part of the learning process and not
necessarily the result of bad learning or teach ing.
Therefore, meaningful tasks imply meaningful
learning and end with meaningful communication. Likewise, the conditions under which a task
is performed will have important consequences
for the type of language used by learners in communicative tasks. Ellis (2003) refers to this situation when he says that Task-Based Learning and
Teach ing call for classroom participants to forget
they are in the classroom, a teach ing-learning
setting, and imagine themselves in a more communicatively effective environment where ne-

gotiation of meaning is taking place. The reason
would seem obvious: the goal of language teach ing
is or should be the enabling of students to express
personal meanings. Certain researchers such as
Long (1983) underscore the fact that a task needs
to include negotiation of meaning in order to effectively propel language acquisition forward. So,
it is argued, we should provide our learners with
meaningful tasks which include plenty of opportunities for the negotiation of meaning.
Teach r and Students’ Roles
e
when Engaging in Task-Based
Learning
Teach er and students’ roles change within a taskbased approach. TBL presents learning and teach ing
as collaborative work. Classes are student-centered.
Teach ers address students’ needs and interests by
becoming facilitators. According to Willis and
Willis (2007), teach ers who engage in Task-Based
Learning promote real language use; when doing
so, they become leaders and organizers of discussion, managers of group or pair work, motivators to
engage students in performing a task and language
experts to provide language feedback when needed.
The main issues here are the degrees to which the
teach er is responsible for content. The role of the
students is far from being one of the passive recipients of comprehensible input; students are now seen
to take the leading role in their own learning. Van
den Branden (2006) agrees with the fact that taskbased lessons are student-centered, which means
students take the main part in the learning process.
Learners are autonomous to negotiate course content or to choose linguistic forms when performing
a task. Negotiation is done by providing options for
the learners; for example, the teach er may suggest
a series of topics and students decide which one to
begin with. Learners are also group participants.
Many of the tasks are done in pairs or groups which


167


will require adaptation for those students used to
working individually or those used to whole class
instruction. Another role for learners is the one of
risk takers. Students constantly face challenges that
involve the use of the target language. Students need
to make the most of every opportunity to develop
language while performing the task. Richards and
Rodgers (2004) say that both teach ers and learners
in Task-Based Learning are responsible for the development of classroom interaction.
Task-Based Learning Models
There have been many task-based TBL models
for class lessons. Ellis (2003) presented a model that
focuses on meaning and real-world activities that demand learners to process language for real situations:
Table 1. A framework for designing
task-based lessons (Ellis, 2003)

Framing the activity
Pre-task
(e.g. establishing the outco(consciousness-raising me of the task)
activities)
Regulating planning time
Doing a similar task
During task

Time pressure
Regulating topic

Post-task
Number of participants
(Focused communica- Learner report
tion activities)
Repeat task
Reflection

According to this model, English language development occurs when learners are given enough
time to prepare and perform a task. There is some
attention to form while communication takes
place. Communicative tasks reflect three main approaches: consciousness-raising activities, focused
communication activities and interpretation activities. As can be seen from Table 1, the pre-task
shows students the grammar they will master in
the future and form is engineered by the design of

168

the task. On the other hand, during task stage focuses on communication activities, which means
performance is crucial. The way teach ers handle
error correction and how students react to the task
are important. Teach ers are expected to let communication flow and find strategies to make error
correction in such a way that indirect focus on
form is accomplished. Finally, students report to
class. They may be exposed to any kind of input and
then share with the group their understanding. Ellis’ model also shows the conditions under which a
task is performed (2003). He suggests a number of
ways to regulate tasks: for example time pressure,
which is regulated by the amount of time given
to learners to perform the task. Familiarity with a
topic also influences task performance. If a topic
is relevant to students’ own experiences, there are
more chances of having engagement and intrinsic
motivation.
Another task-based model was outlined by
Willis (1996, p. 38), who used the format of PreTask, Task Cycle and Language Focus. This model
will be used for the lesson plan exemplified in this
paper (Table 2).
The table clearly shows three stages: pre-task,
task cycle and language focus. During the pretask stage the teach er identifies and introduces
the topic and learners feel motivated to perform
the task. The teach er recalls and activates existing
knowledge by exploring the topic and highlighting
useful words and phrases which might be needed
during task performance. The second stage, task
cycle, gives learners the opportunity to perform
real world tasks with the teach er’s monitoring. It
is advisable to have students work in pairs or in
small groups at this stage. Also, while planning,
the teach er should provide all the necessary input by acting as a facilitator. Learners plan how to
present the outcome of their work, generally by exchanging and comparing final products. Students



Table 2. Task-based lesson plan model (Willis, 1996, p. 38)

Pre-task
Introduction to topic and tasks
Teach er explores the topic with the class, highlights useful words and phrases.
Learners may be exposed to examples.

Task cycle
Planning

Task
Students do the task in pairs or
small groups. Teach er monitors;
mistakes do not matter.

Students prepare to report. Accuracy is important, so the teach er
stands by and gives advice.

Report
Students exchange or present report.
Teach er listens and then comments.

Laguage focus
Analysis
Students examine then discuss.

report the conclusions they have reached. The final
stage, language focus, places emphasis on language
features used during the two previous stages. The
language focus provides opportunities for students
to analyse and practice specific linguistic features
arising from task. All in all, Task-Based Learning
moves from fluency to accuracy and fluency again,
which demonstrates that although form is important, it is not the central part of the task model.
Willis’ (1996) three-stage task model does
not clearly state the evaluation component. The
teach er’s monitoring during the task cycle is a kind
of informal assessment since s/he provides indirect
Table 3. Assessment stage Assessment

1. Students complete the Task Evaluation Form
(see sample in Appendix 3).
2. The evaluation form considers previous stages
and desired outcome.
3. Teach er uses a rubric to evaluate students’
outcome.

Practice
Teach er conducts practice of new words.

feedback. However, we would suggest a four stage
called Assessment as shown in Table 3.
Ellis (2003) considers different issues related
to task assessment. One of the considerations is
that tasks have to be meaningful and show how
and what the learning is. We propose two kinds
of assessment: first, formal assessment using rubrics and second, informal assessment using
a self-evaluation format. Rubrics evaluate task
performance. The rubric will consider sequence
of tasks, group participation and outcome. The
teach er will make this formal assessment by giving a score to each one of the important aspects
when performing the task. Douglas (2000, as cited
in Ellis, 2003, p. 289) considers target language use
and task characteristics when assessing tasks. As
a result, rubrics state the objective of the task, the
procedures, the use of time for completing the task
and the format, all aspects involving the use of a
target language.
Another kind of assessment we propose is a
self-assessment form which will provide students’


169


feedback and attitudes towards the given task. This
evaluation is done individually, even if students
worked in pairs or groups. Appendix 3 shows an example of a self-assessment form in which students
have the possibility to reflect on their own learning
process before, during and after a specific task. The
first aspect to consider is the “Goal” where students
reflect upon their final understanding of the task.
On the second aspect students analyze their performance during the task cycle. Following that, students choose what the best way to work is for them
(individually, pair work or group work). On the
fourth aspect, students think about their linguistic
and functional learning, and finally, students have
the opportunity to give their opinions, suggestions
and recommendations based on the task developed.
This validation tool guarantees the lesson plan has
achieved a clear goal. Besides, the teach er will count
on at least two kinds of evidence to validate the success or failure of the lesson. Nunan (2004, p. 6) states
that “assessment/evaluation is concerned with the
selection of assessment and evaluation instruments
and procedures” in our specific case: rubrics and
self-evaluation form as illustrated in Appendix 3.
It is advisable to adjust the form to the outcome
of each one of the tasks. The form will have students
assessing task performance and achievement. This
evaluation form will provide insights about four
different aspects: task goal, task performance, kind
of interaction, language focus and future actions.
The task goal is stated in terms of language use and
functions. Also, it has students reflect if they truly
reached the desired outcome. Task performance
has students reflect on the strengths and weaknesses during the task cycle. Teach ers may use this
feedback to improve input and monitoring future
tasks. Although TBL advocates cooperative learning, there are instances in which students might
prefer to work on their own. By indicating the kind
of interaction students prefer, teach ers identify how

170

to plan future lessons: individually, in pairs or group
work according to the students’ performances and
interests. The language focus provides information on how students are doing in term of language
and finally, future tasks give feedback on the how
and what plan for upcoming task-based lessons.
Ellis (2003) points out that self-assessment fosters
students’ autonomy, and “can serve as a means of
developing a reflective attitude in the learner and
can stimulate goal setting” (p. 302). In this respect,
English language development, which is seen more
as a process than a product, will be supported by
a component of formative formal and informal assessment. As Nunan (2004) states, it is not only important to “know that” but also “to know how”, the
two proposed assessment instruments evaluate the
“what” and the “how”.
Task-Based Lessons
Richards and Rodgers (2004) say that TaskBased Learning is an approach that uses tasks as the
main unit for planning and instruction. Language is
meaningful so that learners engage in tasks and thus
learning takes place. The previous models show that
a lesson could be a series of tasks or a task may be
developed in more than one lesson, which means
there may be multiple tasks or mini-tasks within
the main task. Goals and objectives will be stated in
terms of language use (functions) rather than linguistic forms. Lessons will be a sequence of different tasks, one related to the other, reaching a goal or
outcome (Willis & Willis, 2007); all the communicative tasks are the vehicle of communication.
The best way to integrate a task-based approach
is by going from topics to tasks. Topics are relevant
to the students’ lives and make a sequence of different tasks feasible. In order to raise awareness,
teach ers can not merely choose a topic from the
textbook, examination papers, or social contexts
but can also ask pupils to suggest their own topics



Table 4. Taxonomy of task types in Willis and Willis (2007)

Task types

Examples of specific tasks

Listing

Brainstorming
Fact-finding
Games based on listing: quizzes, memory and guessing.

Ordering and sorting

Sequencing
Ranking ordering
Classifying

Comparing and contrasting

Games finding similarities and differences
Graphic organizers

Problem-solving tasks

Logic problem prediction

Projects and creative tasks

Newspaper
Posters
Survey fantasy

Sharing personal experiences

Story telling
Anecdotes
Reminiscences

Matching

Words and phrases to pictures

from a list given by the teach er. When the topic has
been chosen, teach ers can set up different types of
tasks which are classified according to cognitive
processes (Table 4).
Willis and Willis (2007) say that “a good task
not only generates interest and creates an acceptable degree of challenge, but also generates opportunities for learners to experience and activate as
much language as possible” (p. 70). At this point it is
necessary to distinguish among focus on meaning,
focus on language and focus on form. The teach er
begins by choosing a topic, narrows it down and designs the different kinds of tasks; while developing

the tasks there will be different language needs. Focus on language and form depends on how tasks are
graded. Pupils begin with a simple task and during
the task cycle perform more challenging cognitive
and linguistic tasks. There will be different instances
to focus on language and form; however, the main
focus is on meaning since students want to achieve
an outcome. Focus on language occurs when learners “pause their process for meaning and switch to
thinking about the language itself ” (Willis & Willis,
2007, p. 113). Learners are working independently
with meaning and highlight any language they
need to draw upon. For example, students look up

Table 5. Main differences between focusing on language and form (Willis & Willis, 2007, p. 114)

Focus on language
• Students’ initiative and needs.
• Takes into account the context of the
communicative activity.
• Students explore what they need.
• Student-centered.

Focus on form
• Teach er’s initiative and need.
• Outside the context of the
communicative activity.
• Teach er provides what students need.
• Teach er-centered.


171


a word, choose the best expression or word, check
sentences for accuracy or improve the main idea.
Focus on form occurs when the teach er isolates a
specific structure and explains it outside the context
of the communicative activity (Willis & Willis, 2007,
p. 114). Table 5 summarizes the main differences.
As can be seen, choosing, sequencing and implementing tasks will combine a focus on meaning
and a focus on form. The lesson presented in Table

6 shows how learners go through a series of tasks
in order to attain a final goal, which is to have a
class celebration. Each one of the stages prepares
learners for the next. The pre-task stage is the
shortest in the cycle. The teach er will introduce the
topic of celebrations and learners will activate previous learning and meaningful experiences. This
stage creates interest since learners will share life
experiences about celebrations. During the task

Table 6. Sample of a lesson

Lesson
Topic: celebrations
The following is an example of a task-based lesson having speaking development as one of its main purposes.
Time: 80 minutes
Level: High intermediate
Grade: Undergraduate students- although it may be used at any level
Task sequence:
Task-based speaking
This is a speaking lesson on the theme of organizing a celebration. Students, in groups, will plan a
celebration.
Pre-task
Introduction to topic and tasks (10 min)
Aim: To introduce the topic of celebrations and to give the class exposure to language related to them. It is important to highlight new words and phrases.
Introduction to topic and tasks (10 min)
Aim: To introduce the topic of celebrations and to give the class exposure to language related to them. It is important to highlight new words and phrases.
Priming: Show students pictures of a celebration. For example, photographs of the family celebrating Christmas
or someone’s birthday.
Tell how the celebration went. Use the pictures to provide as many details as possible.
When you finish sharing your personal experience, distribute a card with the following questions and have students answer them:
When was your last family celebration?
Which are some of the special occasions you celebrate with family or friends?
What is your favorite celebration with friends or family?
What was the last celebration you had with your family or friends? How was it?
What details make a celebration a success?
Do you remember an especially happy celebration with friends or family? What happened?

172



Task cycle

Planning ( 40 min. Keep in
mind the task involves writing)
Task (10 min)
Tasks may take longer to
prepare
Tell students, in groups of four,
Students in groups plan the chosen
that they will plan a celebration
celebration. For example, Christmas,
including all aspects around it like
Halloween, birthday, or 4th of July.
invitation cards and/or a newspaper (See Appendix 2: Task card which
article to report all the facts about
explains the process and requirethe celebration. Give some minutes ments). Students prepare to report.
to think it over. The groups disIt is advisable to check how roles and
cuss possibilities for a celebration,
assignments are distributed within
brainstorm vocabulary (e.g. kinds
the group. Everybody needs to be
of celebrations, objects used for
involved. Accuracy is important, so
certain celebrations). Give rubrics
the teach er stands by and provides
at this point so students know how feedback to each one of the groups.
they will be assessed (see Appendix Homework is to be ready to report
1 for rubrics on this lesson). Teach er next class.
monitors and answers questions.

Report ( 8 min. per group)
The classroom is divided. Each
group is assigned a place in the
classroom to decorate and provide the environment for their
celebration. Students present,
classmates listen and participate
in their celebration. They can ask
after the presentation. Teach er
gives feedback on the content
and quickly comments. Students vote and choose the best
celebration.

Language focus

Analysis (10 min)

Practice

Write sentences given by students on the board.
Highlight language you want to address. Students
review phrases in context and take notes of the
language they need.

Option A (in the classroom). Exit card: in pairs. Each
student asks two questions about one of the celebrations.
Option B (at home). Teach er assigns homework to
practice new words or structures.
Evaluation

Students complete the Task Evaluation Form (see Appendix 3 for Celebrations - Task Evaluation Form)
Teach er completes rubrics

phase students will make decisions based on their
likes and needs. They will choose what celebration
to organize and how to present it to the class. Each
learner will be responsible for one aspect to make
this celebration a success. Students may use their
knowledge of the topic and language structures to
accomplish the task; the teach er will act as a facilitator by providing feedback as needed.

When using the previous task-based lesson,
learners are more motivated and engaged in the
learning process. Learners make decisions according to their interest which ends in meaningful
learning. For example, during the pre-task phase
they talk about their own celebrations and ask
about their classmate’s which make them appropriate to learn with. Learners are more responsible
for their own learning which will end in autonomy.


173


Although there is time for writing, students will be
focused on speaking activities.
Conclusion
As a way of conclusion, Task-Based Learning
offers more advantages than disadvantages. A TBL
framework focuses on language acquisition and
learning through different tasks that pursue a goal.
When carrying out the tasks, learners do not concentrate on language features, but on reaching their
goal. Learners are engaged in each one of the tasks
since life experiences and previous knowledge support learning. Language is used in everyday life and
accounts for students’ interests.
Students are autonomous and teach ers monitor
and facilitate learning or language acquisition.
Learners are given clear guidelines and make decisions on roles and how to present the final result.
After the task completion, language should be analyzed. This analysis is done by using examples from
the tasks performed. Students will be required to do
some kind of practice in or outside the classroom.
Since there are many kinds of tasks, classes are varied, which increases students’ motivation. Finally,
language is used for communication. However,
the difficulties of following a Task-Based Learning
approach lay in teach ers’ and students’ attitudes.
Practitioners need to be prepared to use language
as a means not as an end. Also, teach ers have to differentiate real tasks from mere class activities. This
differentiation may take time, especially if one considers the fact that many class activities look like
tasks; for instance, role plays. A role play is a task
only if students have a clear goal and during the interaction there is a kind of negotiation of meaning.
A role play is not a task if students only recite a part

174

of a conversation. There is only language learning
if students are using language to reach their communicative purposes. The last criticism of a TaskBased approach is the apparent lack of focus on
grammar. As has been stated and seen in the lesson plan provided, there is a focus on form; it is
just not the main point and it is influenced by the
students’ needs. Task-Based Learning is a new style
of having students perform goal-oriented activities
which demand real purpose, sequence and grading.
Task-Based Learning (TBL) is a new way of having
students use the language according to their communication needs.
References
Ellis, R. (2003). Task based language learning and teach ing.
New York: Oxford University Press.
Long, M. (1983). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 4, 126-141.
Nunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for the communicative
classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nunan, D. (2004). Task based language teach ing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J., & Rodgers, T. (2004). Approaches and methods in language teach ing. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Skehan, P. (1996). A framework for the implementation of
task-based learning. Applied Linguistics, 17, 38-62.
Van den Branden, K. (2006). Task based language education. From theory to practice. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Willis, D., & Willis, J. (2007). Doing task based teach ing.
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Willis, J. (1996). A framework for task based learning. Harlow: Longman.



About the Authors
Monica Rodríguez-Bonces is currently pursuing her Ph.D in education. She has done research in the
areas of autonomy, culture and language learning. Part of this experience can be reviewed in published
articles in national and international publications. She is also the co-author of two text-books. She is a
teach er at Universidad Central and Universidad ÚNICA.
Jeisson Rodríguez-Bonces is doing an M.A. in Applied Linguistics to TEFL and ELE. He is a teach er
at Universidad Central, UNITEC, and Universidad Pedagógica Nacional. Adults and teenagers have been
part of his teach ing experience as well as experience outside Colombia.


175


Appendix 1: Rubrics for a Lesson about Celebrations
Name ______________________________________

Date ___________________

Beginning
0-1

Developing
2

Accomplished
3

Exemplary
4

VISUAL - ART

Sloppy, used pencil/
pen. Hard to see
and/or read. Not
very creative or
appealing.

Project is somewhat
neat, but needs
work. Words are
not easily read
and more color is
needed to catch the
eye of the reader.

Project is very neat,
but the organization is
not as good as it could
be. Words were readable and neat. Project
is mostly creative and
appealing.

The project is neat
and orderly. There
are many visuals and
an excellent text for
cards and newspaper articles. The
information is easy
to read. Everything
is creative and
appealing.

TASK DESIGN

Students did not
plan any celebration.

Students are still
planning their
celebration.

Students planned
most of the aspects of
the celebration.

Students planned
the celebration.

COVERAGE
OF TOPIC
(invitation card,
newspaper article,
party decor)

Includes few or
none of the required
aspects

Includes many
of the required
aspects

Includes most of the
required aspects

Includes all required
aspects

CLASS TIME

Did not use time to
focus on the project
or often distracted

Used some of the
time well. There
was some focus
but occasionally
distracted.

Used time well.
Usually focused on
project and never
distracted.

Used time well.
Always focused on
project. Never asked
to get to work.

PARTICIPATION
AND
PREPARATION

There is not any
activity prepared.

Only a few members of the group
participated. It was
somewhat prepared, organized and
creative.

Most of the students
were involved. It was
very organized,
creative and
prepared.

Everybody was
involved in the
activity. It was very
organized, creative
and prepared.

176



Appendix 2: Task Card with Processes and Requirements

TASK CARD:
CELEBRATIONS
INTRODUCTION
Do you like celebrations? What is your favorite celebration? How do people
around the world celebrate major holidays? Now it is time to organize your
own celebration for the class.
TASK
In groups you are going to organize your own celebration. Decide what you want
to celebrate and invite your classmates to attend this magnificent event.
PROCEDURE
In groups decide the celebration you want to have (wedding, anniversary, Mother’s
Day, Father’s Day, Saint Valentine’s, New Year’s, etc.).
Organize all the aspects to consider in order to make this celebration a success.
The following is a list you need to bear in mind when planning:
a. Write an invitation.
b. Write a newspaper article about the details.
c. Organize an activity to do during the celebration.
d. Bring and explain some décor and food. For example: Thanksgiving: Turkey
and orange colors.
CONCLUSION
Vote for the best celebration.

Make a chart comparing and contrasting all the different celebrations.


177


Appendix 3: Task Evaluation Form (to Be Completed by Each Student)
Topic: Celebrations
Read the following sentences and check (√) yes, no or sometimes.

Aspect

Read the following sentences and check (√) yes, no or sometimes.
Yes
No
Sometimes

1. Goal
a. I reach the task outcome_ __________________
b. I provide information about_________________
c. I know all the aspects around________________
d. I ask and answer about_____________________
e. I understand all the information about a_______
2. Task performance
During the task cycle:
a. I had problems with vocabulary
b. I had difficulties understanding what my classmate was saying
c. I had difficulty expressing my thoughts
d. I forgot expressions related to _______
e. I was relaxed
3. Interaction
a. I liked working in groups
b. I prefer working individually
4. Language focus
a. I used new vocabulary
b. I used the grammar I needed
c. My classmates provided language support when needed
d. My teach er provided language support when needed
e. I learned new grammar, vocabulary and/or expressions
f. I had the right amount of time to do my task
5. In the future
a. I would like to be assigned similar tasks
b. I would like to do a task having the same topic but different
outcome
c. I want to place emphasis on:
Writing
Speaking
Vocabulary
Read ing
Listening

178


Task based language learning. old approach, new style. a new lesson to learn.

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Similar to Task based language learning. old approach, new style. a new lesson to learn. (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Task based language learning. old approach, new style. a new lesson to learn.