The current challenges of upgrading the infrastructure
1 like413 views
The document discusses the ongoing challenges and initiatives in upgrading the infrastructure for managing and preserving social science research data, emphasizing the need for improved access and data sharing across Europe. It outlines the establishment of a formal legal structure for data archives through the CESSDA European Research Infrastructure Consortium, aiming to enhance data accessibility and legal collaboration. Key challenges include varying levels of data archiving acceptance among countries, the need for sustainable funding, and effective policies for managing research data sharing.
![METADATA
METADATA
A crucial part of making data user-friendly, shareable and with
long-lasting usability is to ensure they can be understood and
interpreted by any user. This requires clear data description,
annotation, contextual information and documentation.
Good documentation for research data contains both study-level
information about the research and data creation, as well as
descriptions and annotations at the variable, data item or data file
level.
Metadata are a subset of core data documentation, which provides
standardised structured information explaining the purpose, origin,
time references, geographic location, creator, access conditions and
terms of use of a data collection.
[UK DA, 2012]
Belgrade, 2012](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/challengesinarchivingbelgrade2012-121221015414-phpapp02/85/The-current-challenges-of-upgrading-the-infrastructure-21-320.jpg)
The current challenges of upgrading the infrastructure
- 1. THE CURRENT CHALLENGES OF UPGRADING THE INFRASTRUCTURE FOR ACCESS AND PRESERVATION OF SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH DATA Janez Štebe, Irena Vipavc Brvar ADP, University of Ljubljana Invited lecture at IEN, Belgrade, nov. 2012
- 2. The data deluge Introduction •Special free Science 2011 journal issue: “the challenges posed by the data deluge and the opportunities that can be realized if we can better organize and access the data”.
- 3. • High Level Expert Group on Scientific Data report to the EC, October 2010
- 4. DATA: A COMMON CHALLENGE
- 5. The Topic of Research data is not something new for our science community: Social Science Data Archives
- 6. Načrt razvoja raziskovalnih infrastruktur 2011-2020 WHAT IS OUR CURRENT PROSPECT? •The document is accepted •The implementation already started Part of a wider ESFRI framework, „the European Strategy Forum on Research Infrastructures“. Special financial arrangement agreed on a intergovernmental level: Participating nations agreed on financial obligations regarding international activities and national service provision.
- 7. KAZALO CESSDA 1. UVOD 1 1.1. DEFINICIJA RI 1 1.2. POMEN RAZISKOVALNIH INFRASTRUKTUR 1 1.3. AKTIVNOSTI, KI SO PRIPELJALE DO NAČRTA 2 1.4. METODOLOGIJA IZBIRE PRIORITET 3 AND 2. OPIS PRIORITETNIH MEDNARODNIH PROJEKTOV 6 2.1. CERN 6 2.2. FAIR 8 ADP 2.3. CERIC 9 2.4. SHARE 10 2.5. ESS 11 ARE PART OF A PLANE: 2.6. DARIAH 13 2.7. CESSDA 14 (…) 3. PRIORITETNA NACIONALNA PODROČJA 26 (…) 3.4.7. DIGITALNI NACIONALNI VIRI 32 3.4.8. DRUŽBOSLOVNA IN HUMANISTIČNA RI 33 3.4.9. RI ZA APLIKACIJE V VESOLJU 34 3.4.10. VARNA IN ZDRAVA HRANA 34(…)
- 8. CESSDA ERIC • A preparations for new CESSDA ERIC were elaborated during EU fp7 project CESSDA PPP •The expert base is defined •Complex legal issues are being solved now: •we expect the formal establishment of CESSDA ERIC for beginning of 2013
- 9. CESSDA PPP goal IMPROVING Creating structure this project is mainly about creating a new formal legal entity out of what has up until now been an informal grouping, involving organisations in different European countries. “Each of these,” he said, “has common ACCESS TO SOCIAL SCIENCE DATA goals of preserving and sharing data from social sciences, and making them as readily available and as useful for users as possible – negotiating access with data producers to increase the quantity and quality fund of data available to social scientists. ” “The situation at the moment is that the take-up, or embracing, of data archiving, is different in different countries. A significant part of this project is about promoting the role of the data archive in countries where they exist, but don’t have the total buy-in from people at the top who can provide the funding needed to bring some of the less- well resourced organisations up to speed with developments that are happening elsewhere. This will give them the opportunity to capitalise on what others are doing - thereby effecting knowledge and skills transfer between the older and newer, the larger and smaller, organisations. “ Thus in planning the new organisation, in order to create fully interoperable systems, it will also be important to create a more equal, accountable and sustainable funding base.” (K. Schürer, – from the interview for Projects 15 journal)
- 10. New challenges The ADP upgrade following the National plane Our activities in last two years: •Organizational, human experts resources enlarged • Trusted Digital Preservation • Increased access to official statistical microdata for research purposes •The ecology of consistent national policy and service infrastructure for Open Research Data is planned
- 11. Increased awareness of challenges of digital preservation DIGITAL PRESERVATION One more quote from the Projects 15 interview: Archiving is often thought of as a very static thing – you put something into a cupboard and then forget about it, and if somebody does want it in 100 years time then OK, they could leaf through it and glean some information. However, this can’t work for digital materials. “Instead, we actively curate, making sure the data are held in a format that is going to minimise possible loss. For example, so they’re not dependent on software or hardware, so that in 10 years’ time when that right software or equipment or storage media no longer exist or work, you haven’t lost the data.“
- 12. • Granularity of different objects versions that are citable as CURRENT a reference in published article: • DDI Study description • Data files: PUF, SUF, original data file with no confidentially restrictions CHALLENGES • Variables • Related documents, files • Persistent identifiers as infrastructure for tracing the data and publications: What is DataCite? See DataCite Our aim is to: • establish easier access to research data on the Internet • increase acceptance of research data as legitimate, citable contributions to the scholarly record • support data archiving that will permit results to be verified and re-purposed for future study. Compare ICPSR's Efforts to Encourage Data Citation
- 13. Ongoing activity OFFICIAL MICRODATA • FP7 Project Data without Boundaries (DwB) •which aim is to enhance transnational access for the researchers to government microdata within Europe through collaboration between producers of government data and data archives. •The barriers the project addresses are those in resource discovery, metadata standards, researcher accreditation, ACCESS legal frameworks, and use of research data centres for confidential microdata. •SORS and ADP are contributing to different WP •In parallel increased collaboration with SURS •ADP adds additional value to SURS microdata access service
- 14. BEST CABINET OFFICE CONSULTATION ON MAKING OPEN DATA REAL PRACTICE EXAMPLES EXISTS A response from the Economic and Social Data Service and the UK Data Archive The UK Data Archive, for example, already acts as an agent for public service providers in the dissemination of microdata produced by a number of government departments. In over 40 years worth of activity we have maintained a balance between the commitment to ensuring data is available for research purposes while ensuring that access is controlled in accordance with the risk/impact level of the data in the disclosure of data. The UK Data Archive, on behalf of the Economic and Social Research Council already runs the Secure Data Service – a unique service in the UK with a philosophy of enabling secure and safe and yet remote access to sensitive data produced by public and private sector organisations.
- 15. International incentives National project Open data action plane for Slovenia ‚, OECD Principles and Guidelines for Access to Research Data from Public Funding‘‘ (2007). Increased efficiency of science Open research data access can help
- 16. Findings during the project Findings Low culture of data sharing Policy of research data management is absent Legal issues unsolved Unequally developed data infrastructure and services Report: Opis stanja na področju raziskovalnih podatkov v Sloveniji Accessible: http://adp.fdv.uni-lj.si/o_arhivu/publikacije/odpp10_opis_stanja/
- 17. Main lesions learned CONCLUSIONS •Efficiency of service is an obligation: common tools development… •Users needs are a guiding principle •High level research policy support is necessary: explicit responsibility of service providers, research data creators and users •Newcomers can profit
- 18. RESEARCH DATA LIFECYCLE Belgrade, 2012
- 19. DEPOSIT DATA TO DATA ARCHIVES ARCHIVING Why deposit: - Assurance that data meet set quality standards DATA - Long-term preservation of data in standardised accessible data formats - Safe-keeping of data in a secure environment with the ability to control access - Online resource discovery of data through data catalogues - Licensing arrangements to acknowledge data rights - Standardised citation mechanism to acknowledge data ownership - Promotion of data to many users Belgrade, 2012
- 20. SHARING DATA VIA DATA ARCHIVE SHARING Benefits Of Data Sharing for Researchers Assists in implementing publishers‘ data retention policies DATA Increases visibility of scholarly work May enhance researchers’ reputation May increase citations (open access journal articles cited more) Enable collaborations on closely related themes, and new topics Benefits Of Data Sharing for Public Production of high quality research with social value Advance science to the benefit of society Compliance with laws and regulations Adoption of emerging norms – ‘open access’ publishing To be, and appear to be, open and accountable Benefits Of Data Sharing for Funders Make optimal use of publicly funded research Avoid duplication of data collection Maximise return for investment Belgrade, 2012
- 21. METADATA METADATA A crucial part of making data user-friendly, shareable and with long-lasting usability is to ensure they can be understood and interpreted by any user. This requires clear data description, annotation, contextual information and documentation. Good documentation for research data contains both study-level information about the research and data creation, as well as descriptions and annotations at the variable, data item or data file level. Metadata are a subset of core data documentation, which provides standardised structured information explaining the purpose, origin, time references, geographic location, creator, access conditions and terms of use of a data collection. [UK DA, 2012] Belgrade, 2012
- 22. METADATA METADATA Metadata for online data catalogues or discovery portals are often structured to international standards or schemes such as Dublin Core, ISO 11179, Data Documentation Initiative (DDI), Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS) and Statistical Data and Metadate Exchange (SDMX) – in NSI‘s. The DDI is an international XML-based descriptive metadata standard for social science data used by most social science data archives in the world. metadata editors Belgrade, 2012
- 24. ACCESS TO METADATA AND DATA ACCESS Slovene social science data archives - ADP SL + EN / own services + CESSDA portal The CESSDA Data Portal provides a seamless interface to datasets from social science data archives across Europe. The data may be located in several ways, for example by searching or browsing by topic, keyword or data publisher. The data portal may be searched and viewed in any one of nine languages and trough 14 EU archives. Most of the datasets are freely available for academic use. Belgrade, 2012
- 27. ACCESS TO DATA / NESSTAR
- 30. DEVELOPMENT Evaluation Štebe at IASSIST, 2012
- 31. URN URN (UNIFORM RESOURCE NAME) Štebe at IASSIST, 2012
- 32. OPEN ACCESS OPEN ACESS OECD Principles and Guideliness for Access to Research Data from Public Funding …are meant to apply to research data, whether already in existence or yet to be produced, that are supported by public funds for the purposes of developing publicly accessible scientific research and knowledge….. This kind of data should be publicly available. .. in accordance with the objectives and principles, such as openness, transparency, legal conformity, formal responsibility, professionalism, protection of intellectual property, interoperability, quality and security, efficiency, accountability and others. UNESCO - Open Access to Scientific Information UNESCO promotes Open Access (OA), with particular emphasis on scientific information (journal articles, conference papers and datasets of various kinds) emanating from publicly funded research. Belgrade, 2012
- 33. If you have questions about access to data or data archiving please contact us at http://www.adp.fdv.uni-lj.si/ E-mail: arhiv.podatkov@fdv.uni-lj.si Belgrade, 2012