SlideShare a Scribd company logo
5
Most read
6
Most read
9
Most read
- The Whats, Whys, Whens, Hows and Whos involved -




                                                     1
“The first – and usually the best – opportunity for successful change is
to exploit one’s own successes and build on them. Problems cannot be
ignored. And serious problems have to be taken care of. But to be change
leaders, enterprises have to focus on opportunities. They have to starve
problems and feed opportunities.”

                                                     Peter Drucker



                                                                      2
Introduction..........................................................................................................................................4.

What is Project Selection?.....................................................................................................................5.

Why Do Project Selection?.....................................................................................................................7.

When to Do?..........................................................................................................................................9.

Who Should Be Involved?.....................................................................................................................10.

A Diagram Overview............................................................................................................................11.

Defining Project Selection Criteria –
Examples, Advantages and Disadvantages.........................................................................................12.

           Case Study 1 – The formation of a Steering Committee……………………………………………………………………..12.

           Case Study 2 – Choosing one of two methods:
           Benefit Measurement and Constrained Optimization………………………………………………………………………..15.

Conclusion...........................................................................................................................................20.

Bibliography........................................................................................................................................21.
                                                                                                                                                           3
 One of the biggest decisions that any organization would have to make is
  related to the projects they would undertake. Once a proposal has been
  received, there are numerous factors that need to be considered before an
  organization decides to take it up. The most viable option needs to be chosen,
  keeping in mind the goals and requirements of the organization.




                                                                                   4
 Project Selection is a process to assess each project
  idea and select the project with the highest priority.
  Projects are still just suggestions at this stage, so the
  selection is often made based on only brief
  descriptions of the project. As some projects will only
  be ideas, one may need to write a brief description of
  each project before conducting the selection process.




                                                              5
 Selection of projects is based on:


 Benefits: A measure of the positive outcomes of the project. These
  are often described as "the reasons why you are undertaking the
  project". The types of benefits of eradication projects include:
       Biodiversity
       Economic
       Social and cultural
       Fulfilling commitments made as part of national, regional or
           international plans and agreements.
 Feasibility: A measure of the likelihood of the project being a
  success, i.e. achieving its objectives. Projects vary greatly in
  complexity and risk. By considering feasibility when selecting
  projects it means the easiest projects with the greatest benefits are
  given priority.




                                                                          6
   Often one will have a number of suggested projects but not enough resources,
    money or time to undertake all of the projects. The ideas for eradication
    projects may have come from many sources including: the community,
    funders, local and national governments and Non-Governmental
    Organizations (NGOs). One will therefore need a way of deciding on a
    priority order and choosing a project.
   If the organization in question has limited experience in conducting
    eradications then it is recommended to concentrate on a small number of
    projects, ideally one project at a time, until the people in the organization
    have developed the skills and experience. It’s important to grow capacity and
    build up to undertaking multiple projects at any one time. One should do the
    easy projects first and, only then, work towards the most difficult and
    rewarding projects. One should use the easy projects to help answer
    questions/solve issues for the more difficult projects. Also, one should use the
    best opportunities to learn.




                                                                                       7
 One may have a mix of straight forward and difficult
  eradication projects and does not know where to start. The
  Project Selection Stage, then, will assist one by providing a
  process to compare the importance of the projects and select
  the most suitable project to undertake.
 By following the Project Selection Stage one will follow a step
  by step objective method for prioritizing projects - this can be
  used to explain to stakeholders the reasoning behind why one
  selected a particular project.
 The benefits of completing the Project Selection are:
      A transparent and documented record of why a
        particular project was selected.
      A priority order for projects, that takes into account their
        importance and how achievable the project is.




                                                                      8
 Undertake a Project Selection when one has
  more ideas than the number of projects one can
  undertake and need to select the project that
  should be given priority.
 Note: If one only has 1 project in hands, it may
  still be useful to score the project against a set of
  criteria to identify the strengths and
  weaknesses of the project. The results may be
  useful later in the Feasibility Study Stage.


                                                          9
 Agency Management:
      Set selection criteria to ensure the selection process aligns with agency strategies.
      Selection processes are often run as a management initiative before the
       implementing Project Manager (PM) is assigned.
 Stakeholders:
      Stakeholder participation at the start of a project creates strong community
       ownership and support, and increases the chances of a successful outcome.
      Stakeholder input should be included at the ideas stage; one should consult widely
       as one is developing the ideas for projects as the community will be the source of
       many of the best project ideas.
      Stakeholders must be informed of the outcome of the Project Selection Stage.
 PM:
      Involving the PM in the Project Selection process will help build ownership in the
       project and support a successful project in the long run.




                                                                                               10
   Each project idea is scored against the selection criteria and a total project score is calculated. By ranking the ideas in
    order of the highest score one is able to see which idea has the highest priority. This procedure gives one the ability to
    take a number of possible projects and identify which project is most important to first move to the Feasibility Study
    Stage. This Stage is not required if one only has one project idea. A diagram overview follows below:




             (source: http://www.pacificinvasivesinitiative.org/rk/project/1_Project_Selection-Diagram.html)


                                                                                                                                  11
①    Case Study 1 – The formation of a Steering Committee

 Most organizations have a formal, or at least semiformal, process to select and
  prioritize projects.
 A steering committee is responsible for project review, selection, and
  prioritization. It is a group of people comprised of senior managers and
  sometimes midlevel managers who represent each of the functional areas in
  the organization.
 Below, follows how it works:
     The steering committee requests project ideas from the business staff prior
       to the beginning of the fiscal year.
     A special steering committee meeting is called to review the projects, and
       a determination is made on each project as to whether it will be included
       on the upcoming list of projects for the new year. Once the no-go projects
       have been weeded out, the remaining projects are prioritized according to
       their importance and benefit to the organization. The projects are
       documented on an official project list, and progress is reported on the
       active projects at the regular monthly steering committee meetings.

                                                                                    12
 In theory, it’s a great idea. In practice, it works only moderately well.
  Priorities can and do change throughout the year. New projects come up
  that weren’t originally submitted during the call for projects that must be
  added to the list. Reprioritization begins anew, and resource alignment
  and assignments are shuffled. But again, “we’re getting ahead of ourselves”.
  One should be aware that organizations usually have a process to recognize
  and screen project requests, accept or reject those requests based on some
  selection criteria, and prioritize the projects based on some criteria.
 Large, complex projects may be subject to further review via a feasibility
  study before a decision can be made to accept the project. Feasibility
  studies determine the viability of the project and help the company
  determine if the product or service of the project is marketable, profitable,
  safe, and doable.
 What’s the criteria? Well, project selection criteria is an input to the
  project Initiation process. According to the Guide to the PMBOK, project
  selection criteria is concerned with the product of the project. In other
  words, selection criteria is concerned with what the product or service of
  the project will produce and how it will benefit the company.




                                                                                  13
 Selection criteria concerns every area of business from marketing to
  finance to information technology to human resources. It can be subjective
  or objective. Criteria for judging project selection could include financial
  measurements. For example, the selection criteria might dictate that
  projects must increase profits by a certain percentage in order to be
  considered.
 Equally, project selection criteria might include the criteria that an
  increase in market share or an increase in the public awareness of the
  company or product will be enjoyed as a result of this project. There aren’t
  any rules for project selection as the components of selection criteria are
  up to the company, steering committee, or project review committee to
  determine.
 Predetermined selection criteria, such as mentioned above, is one aspect
  of project selection, but so is the individual opinion, and power, of
  selection committee members. One mustn't underestimate the
  importance of the authority, political standing, and individual aspirations
  of selection committee members. Those committee members who happen
  to carry a lot of weight in company circles, so to speak, are likely to get
  their projects approved just on the fact that they are who they are. This is
  sometimes how project selection works in an organization.




                                                                                 14
②   Case Study 2 – Choosing one of two methods: Benefit Measurement and
                              Constrained Optimization
   There are various project selection methods practiced by the modern business organizations. These
    methods have different features and characteristics. Therefore, each selection method is best for
    different organizations.
   Although there are many differences between these project selection methods, usually the underlying
    concepts and principles are the same.
   Below is an illustration of two of such methods (Benefit Measurement and Constrained
    Optimization methods):




              (source: http://www.pacificinvasivesinitiative.org/rk/project/1_Project_Selection-Diagram.html)   15
 As the value of one project would need to be compared against the
  other projects, one could use the benefit measurement methods. This
  could include various techniques, of which the following are the most
  common:
    The PM and his/her team could come up with certain criteria that
      he/she wants his/her ideal project objectives to meet. The PM
      could then give each project scores based on how they rate in each
      of these criteria, and then choose the project with the highest
      score.
    When it comes to the Discounted Cash flow method, the future
      value of a project is ascertained by considering the present value
      and the interest earned on the money. The higher the present value
      of the project, the better it would be for the organization in
      question.
    The rate of return received from the money is what is known as the
      IRR. Here again, one needs to be looking for a high rate of return
      from the project.



                                                                           16
 The mathematical approach is commonly used for larger projects. The
  constrained optimization methods require several calculations in order to
  decide on whether or not a project should be rejected.
 Cost-benefit analysis is used by several organizations to assist them to make
  their selections. Going by this method, one would have to consider all the
  positive aspects of the project, which is the benefits, and then deduct the
  negative aspects (or the costs) from the benefits. Based on the results one
  receives for different projects, one could choose which option would be the
  most viable and financially rewarding.
 These benefits and costs need to be carefully considered and quantified in
  order to arrive at a proper conclusion. Questions that one may want to consider
  asking are in the selection process are:
      1) Would this decision help me to increase organizational value in the long
          run?
      2) How long will the equipment last for?
      3) Would I be able to cut down on costs as I go along?




                                                                                    17
 In addition to these methods, one could also consider
  choosing based on opportunity cost. In other words,
  when choosing any project, one would need to keep in
  mind the profits that one would make if he/she does
  decide to go ahead with the project.
 Profit optimization is therefore the ultimate goal. One
  needs to consider the difference between the profits of
  the project one is primarily interested in, and the next
  best alternative.




                                                             18
 Regarding the implementation of the chosen method:
     The methods described on the previous pages can
     be carried out in various combinations. It is best
     that one tries out different methods, as in this way
     one would be able to make the best decision for
     the organization in question considering a wide
     range of factors rather than concentrating on just
     a few. Careful consideration would therefore need
     to be given to each project.




                                                            19
 All the project selection process (es) and methods
  emphasized and described along this presentation are
  absolutely essential for an efficient business planning.
 It is always best to have a good plan from the
  inception, with a list of criteria to be considered and
  goals to be achieved. This will guide one through the
  entire selection process, and will also ensure that one
  does makes the right choice.




                                                             20
   Internet Resources
          Defining Project Selection Criteria (Webpage)
           Available from:
    http://projectcmd.blogspot.pt/2009/12/defining-project-selection-criteria.html
          (accessed Saturday, 18. November 2012).

          Peter Drucker Quotes (Webpage)
           Available from:
    http://www.the-happy-manager.com/tips/peter-drucker-quotes/
           (accessed Saturday, 18. November 2012).

          Project Selection (Webpage)
           Available from:
    http://www.pacificinvasivesinitiative.org/rk/project/1_Project_Selection.html
           (accessed Saturday, 18. November 2012).

          Project Selection Methods (Webpage)
          Available from:
    http://www.tutorialspoint.com/management_concepts/project_selection_method.htm
          (accessed Saturday, 18. November 2012).




                                                                                     21

More Related Content

PPTX
Project Selection Methods
PPT
Project selection
PPTX
Project Management PERT and CPM
PPTX
Forms of Project Organization
PPT
05. Project And Organizational Structure
DOC
Project management chapter 1 notes
PDF
PDF
Project Budget Powerpoint Presentation Slides
Project Selection Methods
Project selection
Project Management PERT and CPM
Forms of Project Organization
05. Project And Organizational Structure
Project management chapter 1 notes
Project Budget Powerpoint Presentation Slides

What's hot (20)

PPT
Project selection
PPT
Chapter 1 An Overview Of Project Management
PDF
The role and responsibilities of the project manager
PPT
Project management tools and techniques
PPT
Fundamentals of Project Management
ODP
Project evaluation
PPT
Introduction to Project Portfolio Management (PPM)
PDF
Project implimentation
PPTX
Project feasibility study report
PPT
09. Project Cost Management
PPTX
Project scope management 1
PPTX
Project and organizational structure
PPT
Project management structures
PPT
Project manager
PPT
Project organisation structure
PPSX
Project management
PPT
Introduction-to-project-management
PPTX
Project management and project life cycle
PPTX
Project Execution
PPTX
Project planning
Project selection
Chapter 1 An Overview Of Project Management
The role and responsibilities of the project manager
Project management tools and techniques
Fundamentals of Project Management
Project evaluation
Introduction to Project Portfolio Management (PPM)
Project implimentation
Project feasibility study report
09. Project Cost Management
Project scope management 1
Project and organizational structure
Project management structures
Project manager
Project organisation structure
Project management
Introduction-to-project-management
Project management and project life cycle
Project Execution
Project planning
Ad

Viewers also liked (20)

PPT
Project Selection
PPT
project selection
PPT
Project Selection Model
PPT
D06 Project Selection
PPT
Facets of project analysis
PPTX
Technical analysis
PPT
Integrated treasury management in banks
PPTX
Presentation on Working capital management
PPTX
Fund Management
PPTX
Working capital management
PDF
Working Capital Management and Cash Position of Banks in Ghana
DOC
Working capital management of maharashtra bank
PDF
Working Capital Management and Bank profitability in Ghana
PDF
Working capital management
PPT
Lecture 1. introduction to financial management
PPT
Commercial bank management
PPTX
Working capital management
PPTX
Financial planning
PPT
Financial planning
PPTX
Working capital
Project Selection
project selection
Project Selection Model
D06 Project Selection
Facets of project analysis
Technical analysis
Integrated treasury management in banks
Presentation on Working capital management
Fund Management
Working capital management
Working Capital Management and Cash Position of Banks in Ghana
Working capital management of maharashtra bank
Working Capital Management and Bank profitability in Ghana
Working capital management
Lecture 1. introduction to financial management
Commercial bank management
Working capital management
Financial planning
Financial planning
Working capital
Ad

Similar to The Process of Project Selection (20)

PPTX
Intro to Project Management .pptx
PPTX
System Project initiation and planning.pptx
DOCX
Running Head PROJECT 1PROJECT 6PROJECTI.docx
DOCX
Running head UNIT III PROJECT1 UNIT III PROJECT2.docx
PPTX
MODULE II - M.ARCH.pptx
PDF
Rtp mod 2.4
DOC
Pollution control eqipment
DOCX
Chapter 2
DOCX
Assignment brief project management
PPTX
Project management master class karin rheeder
PDF
Successful Project Management Gido 6th Edition Test Bank
PPTX
Ngo’s project management
PPTX
Project management chapter 4 - project integration management-1
PPTX
Pj Screening and selection of Pjs
PPTX
BM52 Project Management and how to manage.pptx
PDF
Project Analysis and Appraisal.pdf
DOC
Project planning
PDF
Project Management SIBPM
PPT
Project Feasibility [DECEMBER 2006]
PPTX
Strategic Management.pptx
Intro to Project Management .pptx
System Project initiation and planning.pptx
Running Head PROJECT 1PROJECT 6PROJECTI.docx
Running head UNIT III PROJECT1 UNIT III PROJECT2.docx
MODULE II - M.ARCH.pptx
Rtp mod 2.4
Pollution control eqipment
Chapter 2
Assignment brief project management
Project management master class karin rheeder
Successful Project Management Gido 6th Edition Test Bank
Ngo’s project management
Project management chapter 4 - project integration management-1
Pj Screening and selection of Pjs
BM52 Project Management and how to manage.pptx
Project Analysis and Appraisal.pdf
Project planning
Project Management SIBPM
Project Feasibility [DECEMBER 2006]
Strategic Management.pptx

More from IES-Social Business School (12)

PDF
A Sustainable Master Model of Leadership
PDF
A Marca Portugal
PDF
Reflective Leadership
PPTX
Managing Successful Projects
PPSX
Yiesia Presentation_PP
PPSX
Apresentação Yiesia_PP
PDF
The Brand of Portugal
PDF
Depth Interview Essay
PDF
Aesthetic Criteria Essay
PDF
PPT
Lobbing - the Key for a Bid to the Olympic Games
PDF
The Country Brand of Portugal
A Sustainable Master Model of Leadership
A Marca Portugal
Reflective Leadership
Managing Successful Projects
Yiesia Presentation_PP
Apresentação Yiesia_PP
The Brand of Portugal
Depth Interview Essay
Aesthetic Criteria Essay
Lobbing - the Key for a Bid to the Olympic Games
The Country Brand of Portugal

The Process of Project Selection

  • 1. - The Whats, Whys, Whens, Hows and Whos involved - 1
  • 2. “The first – and usually the best – opportunity for successful change is to exploit one’s own successes and build on them. Problems cannot be ignored. And serious problems have to be taken care of. But to be change leaders, enterprises have to focus on opportunities. They have to starve problems and feed opportunities.” Peter Drucker 2
  • 3. Introduction..........................................................................................................................................4. What is Project Selection?.....................................................................................................................5. Why Do Project Selection?.....................................................................................................................7. When to Do?..........................................................................................................................................9. Who Should Be Involved?.....................................................................................................................10. A Diagram Overview............................................................................................................................11. Defining Project Selection Criteria – Examples, Advantages and Disadvantages.........................................................................................12. Case Study 1 – The formation of a Steering Committee……………………………………………………………………..12. Case Study 2 – Choosing one of two methods: Benefit Measurement and Constrained Optimization………………………………………………………………………..15. Conclusion...........................................................................................................................................20. Bibliography........................................................................................................................................21. 3
  • 4.  One of the biggest decisions that any organization would have to make is related to the projects they would undertake. Once a proposal has been received, there are numerous factors that need to be considered before an organization decides to take it up. The most viable option needs to be chosen, keeping in mind the goals and requirements of the organization. 4
  • 5.  Project Selection is a process to assess each project idea and select the project with the highest priority. Projects are still just suggestions at this stage, so the selection is often made based on only brief descriptions of the project. As some projects will only be ideas, one may need to write a brief description of each project before conducting the selection process. 5
  • 6.  Selection of projects is based on:  Benefits: A measure of the positive outcomes of the project. These are often described as "the reasons why you are undertaking the project". The types of benefits of eradication projects include:  Biodiversity  Economic  Social and cultural  Fulfilling commitments made as part of national, regional or international plans and agreements.  Feasibility: A measure of the likelihood of the project being a success, i.e. achieving its objectives. Projects vary greatly in complexity and risk. By considering feasibility when selecting projects it means the easiest projects with the greatest benefits are given priority. 6
  • 7. Often one will have a number of suggested projects but not enough resources, money or time to undertake all of the projects. The ideas for eradication projects may have come from many sources including: the community, funders, local and national governments and Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs). One will therefore need a way of deciding on a priority order and choosing a project.  If the organization in question has limited experience in conducting eradications then it is recommended to concentrate on a small number of projects, ideally one project at a time, until the people in the organization have developed the skills and experience. It’s important to grow capacity and build up to undertaking multiple projects at any one time. One should do the easy projects first and, only then, work towards the most difficult and rewarding projects. One should use the easy projects to help answer questions/solve issues for the more difficult projects. Also, one should use the best opportunities to learn. 7
  • 8.  One may have a mix of straight forward and difficult eradication projects and does not know where to start. The Project Selection Stage, then, will assist one by providing a process to compare the importance of the projects and select the most suitable project to undertake.  By following the Project Selection Stage one will follow a step by step objective method for prioritizing projects - this can be used to explain to stakeholders the reasoning behind why one selected a particular project.  The benefits of completing the Project Selection are:  A transparent and documented record of why a particular project was selected.  A priority order for projects, that takes into account their importance and how achievable the project is. 8
  • 9.  Undertake a Project Selection when one has more ideas than the number of projects one can undertake and need to select the project that should be given priority.  Note: If one only has 1 project in hands, it may still be useful to score the project against a set of criteria to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the project. The results may be useful later in the Feasibility Study Stage. 9
  • 10.  Agency Management:  Set selection criteria to ensure the selection process aligns with agency strategies.  Selection processes are often run as a management initiative before the implementing Project Manager (PM) is assigned.  Stakeholders:  Stakeholder participation at the start of a project creates strong community ownership and support, and increases the chances of a successful outcome.  Stakeholder input should be included at the ideas stage; one should consult widely as one is developing the ideas for projects as the community will be the source of many of the best project ideas.  Stakeholders must be informed of the outcome of the Project Selection Stage.  PM:  Involving the PM in the Project Selection process will help build ownership in the project and support a successful project in the long run. 10
  • 11. Each project idea is scored against the selection criteria and a total project score is calculated. By ranking the ideas in order of the highest score one is able to see which idea has the highest priority. This procedure gives one the ability to take a number of possible projects and identify which project is most important to first move to the Feasibility Study Stage. This Stage is not required if one only has one project idea. A diagram overview follows below: (source: http://www.pacificinvasivesinitiative.org/rk/project/1_Project_Selection-Diagram.html) 11
  • 12. Case Study 1 – The formation of a Steering Committee  Most organizations have a formal, or at least semiformal, process to select and prioritize projects.  A steering committee is responsible for project review, selection, and prioritization. It is a group of people comprised of senior managers and sometimes midlevel managers who represent each of the functional areas in the organization.  Below, follows how it works:  The steering committee requests project ideas from the business staff prior to the beginning of the fiscal year.  A special steering committee meeting is called to review the projects, and a determination is made on each project as to whether it will be included on the upcoming list of projects for the new year. Once the no-go projects have been weeded out, the remaining projects are prioritized according to their importance and benefit to the organization. The projects are documented on an official project list, and progress is reported on the active projects at the regular monthly steering committee meetings. 12
  • 13.  In theory, it’s a great idea. In practice, it works only moderately well. Priorities can and do change throughout the year. New projects come up that weren’t originally submitted during the call for projects that must be added to the list. Reprioritization begins anew, and resource alignment and assignments are shuffled. But again, “we’re getting ahead of ourselves”. One should be aware that organizations usually have a process to recognize and screen project requests, accept or reject those requests based on some selection criteria, and prioritize the projects based on some criteria.  Large, complex projects may be subject to further review via a feasibility study before a decision can be made to accept the project. Feasibility studies determine the viability of the project and help the company determine if the product or service of the project is marketable, profitable, safe, and doable.  What’s the criteria? Well, project selection criteria is an input to the project Initiation process. According to the Guide to the PMBOK, project selection criteria is concerned with the product of the project. In other words, selection criteria is concerned with what the product or service of the project will produce and how it will benefit the company. 13
  • 14.  Selection criteria concerns every area of business from marketing to finance to information technology to human resources. It can be subjective or objective. Criteria for judging project selection could include financial measurements. For example, the selection criteria might dictate that projects must increase profits by a certain percentage in order to be considered.  Equally, project selection criteria might include the criteria that an increase in market share or an increase in the public awareness of the company or product will be enjoyed as a result of this project. There aren’t any rules for project selection as the components of selection criteria are up to the company, steering committee, or project review committee to determine.  Predetermined selection criteria, such as mentioned above, is one aspect of project selection, but so is the individual opinion, and power, of selection committee members. One mustn't underestimate the importance of the authority, political standing, and individual aspirations of selection committee members. Those committee members who happen to carry a lot of weight in company circles, so to speak, are likely to get their projects approved just on the fact that they are who they are. This is sometimes how project selection works in an organization. 14
  • 15. Case Study 2 – Choosing one of two methods: Benefit Measurement and Constrained Optimization  There are various project selection methods practiced by the modern business organizations. These methods have different features and characteristics. Therefore, each selection method is best for different organizations.  Although there are many differences between these project selection methods, usually the underlying concepts and principles are the same.  Below is an illustration of two of such methods (Benefit Measurement and Constrained Optimization methods): (source: http://www.pacificinvasivesinitiative.org/rk/project/1_Project_Selection-Diagram.html) 15
  • 16.  As the value of one project would need to be compared against the other projects, one could use the benefit measurement methods. This could include various techniques, of which the following are the most common:  The PM and his/her team could come up with certain criteria that he/she wants his/her ideal project objectives to meet. The PM could then give each project scores based on how they rate in each of these criteria, and then choose the project with the highest score.  When it comes to the Discounted Cash flow method, the future value of a project is ascertained by considering the present value and the interest earned on the money. The higher the present value of the project, the better it would be for the organization in question.  The rate of return received from the money is what is known as the IRR. Here again, one needs to be looking for a high rate of return from the project. 16
  • 17.  The mathematical approach is commonly used for larger projects. The constrained optimization methods require several calculations in order to decide on whether or not a project should be rejected.  Cost-benefit analysis is used by several organizations to assist them to make their selections. Going by this method, one would have to consider all the positive aspects of the project, which is the benefits, and then deduct the negative aspects (or the costs) from the benefits. Based on the results one receives for different projects, one could choose which option would be the most viable and financially rewarding.  These benefits and costs need to be carefully considered and quantified in order to arrive at a proper conclusion. Questions that one may want to consider asking are in the selection process are: 1) Would this decision help me to increase organizational value in the long run? 2) How long will the equipment last for? 3) Would I be able to cut down on costs as I go along? 17
  • 18.  In addition to these methods, one could also consider choosing based on opportunity cost. In other words, when choosing any project, one would need to keep in mind the profits that one would make if he/she does decide to go ahead with the project.  Profit optimization is therefore the ultimate goal. One needs to consider the difference between the profits of the project one is primarily interested in, and the next best alternative. 18
  • 19.  Regarding the implementation of the chosen method:  The methods described on the previous pages can be carried out in various combinations. It is best that one tries out different methods, as in this way one would be able to make the best decision for the organization in question considering a wide range of factors rather than concentrating on just a few. Careful consideration would therefore need to be given to each project. 19
  • 20.  All the project selection process (es) and methods emphasized and described along this presentation are absolutely essential for an efficient business planning.  It is always best to have a good plan from the inception, with a list of criteria to be considered and goals to be achieved. This will guide one through the entire selection process, and will also ensure that one does makes the right choice. 20
  • 21. Internet Resources  Defining Project Selection Criteria (Webpage) Available from: http://projectcmd.blogspot.pt/2009/12/defining-project-selection-criteria.html (accessed Saturday, 18. November 2012).  Peter Drucker Quotes (Webpage) Available from: http://www.the-happy-manager.com/tips/peter-drucker-quotes/ (accessed Saturday, 18. November 2012).  Project Selection (Webpage) Available from: http://www.pacificinvasivesinitiative.org/rk/project/1_Project_Selection.html (accessed Saturday, 18. November 2012).  Project Selection Methods (Webpage) Available from: http://www.tutorialspoint.com/management_concepts/project_selection_method.htm (accessed Saturday, 18. November 2012). 21