The Strategic Analysis and Operation of the Multiservice Model Used for Synchronous Transmission in Communication Networks

BOHR International Journal of Computational Intelligence and Communication Network
202 , Vol. , No. , pp. 47–53
https://doi.org/10.54646/bijcicn.008
www.bohrpub.com
The Strategic Analysis and Operation of the Multiservice Model
Used for Synchronous Transmission in Communication Networks
T. Kiruthiga1,∗ and A. Vaniprabha2
1Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Vetri Vinayaga College of Engineering &
Technology, Thottiyam, Tamil Nadu, India
2Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, SNS College of Engineering, Kurumbapalayam,
Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
∗Corresponding author: drkiruthigaece@gmail.com
Abstract. The core idea of asynchronous transfer mode (ATM) technology was revealed a long time ago. The main
technology under development at the time was time-division multiplexing (TDM) technology, which consisted of
synchronous switching based on the sequence number of bytes in the integrated frame. The main disadvantage
of TDM technology, also known as synchronous transport module (STM) synchronous transmission technology,
is the inability to reallocate the bandwidth of the integrated channel between subchannels. During those periods
when no user data is sent on the subchannel, the aggregated channel still sends the bytes of this subchannel filled
with zeros. Efforts to load sub channels’ idle periods necessitate the introduction of a header for each subchannel’s
data. In intermediate statistical time-division multiplexing (STDM) technology, which allows idle periods to be
filled by transmitting bursts of traffic from other sub channels, headers that actually have a subchannel number
are introduced. In this paper, the strategic analysis and operation of technologies used in multiservice networks
were discussed. Simultaneously, the structure of data sets is drawn into sets resembling computer networks. The
fact that each packet has an address allows it to be transmitted asynchronously since its location relative to data on
other subchannels is not its address. Asynchronous packets from one subchannel are inserted into the free time slots
of another subchannel, but they are not mixed with the data of this subchannel because they have their own address.
Keywords: ATM, TDM, synchronous, switching, transmission, subchannels, STDM, multiservice networks.
INTRODUCTION
Nowadays, passive networks based on optical fiber are
becoming more widespread. Copper twisted pairs do not
compete with passive optical networks (PON) in terms of
size, speed, and data transmission range, noise immunity,
and scalability [1–3]. If initially twisted pair cables were
preferred due to the high cost of optical raw materials and
equipment, now they differ little in terms of capital costs
and labor intensity of computer installation [4, 5].
It is still popular to build integrated-type networks—
fiber to the home (FTTH), where the copper pair is used
only in the section from the switch to the subscriber [6].
However, the dynamics are increasingly moving toward
PON, and the installation of a passive network allows for
modifications without interfering with the system architec-
ture and allows cable rerouting [7–10].
However, installation is capital-intensive and complex,
so it is important to entrust this work to trusted profession-
als [11]. They can create thoughtful system configurations
with the ability to optimize customer needs for seamless
operation [12]. The services of the upper layers of the
network should be similar to the services of the integrated
services digital network (ISDN) network—a variety of
interactive services such as fax transmission, distribution
of television (TV) pictures, voice mail, email, and video
conferencing [13, 14].
The high speed of ATM technology creates many more
opportunities for high-end services that cannot be real-
ized by ISDN networks—for example, the transmission
47
3 2 1

48 T. Kiruthiga and A. Vaniprabha
of color TV images requires bandwidths in the region of
30 Mbps [15–17]. ISDN technology cannot support such
speeds, and this is not a major problem for ATM [18].
ATM standards are developed by a group of organizations
known as the ATM Forum under the auspices of an Insti-
tute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) ad hoc
committee and ITU-T and ANSI committees [19].
ATM is a very complex technology that requires stan-
dardization in various aspects, therefore, although the
main core of standards was adopted, standardization work
is actively underway [20, 21]. All interested parties partici-
pate in the ATM Forum—telecom equipment manufactur-
ers, equipment manufacturers, local area networks (LANs),
telecom network operators, and network integrators [22].
PON is a highly promising broadband multiservice tech-
nology for transmitting data to multiple subscribers using
optical fiber [23, 24]. This networking method has become
popular due to its clear advantages in speed and transfer
rates; and room for improvement [25]. The main difference
between PON and other optical systems is the use of only
passive equipment in the entire area, from the core module
that transmits and receives information streams to the end
user [26, 27].
That means no active switches, routers, media con-
verters, multiplexers, or other equipment that requires
additional power or maintenance [28]. In a PON system,
an optical splitter (splitter, multiplexer, or PLC) is used to
split a stream into multiple subscribers. With its help, a
transceiver module [junction box, switch cabinet, optical
line termination (OLT)] can distribute the signal to unlim-
ited consumers—all this depends on its power and speed
indicators [29, 30].
One of the most significant trends in the telecommuni-
cations market is the growing popularity of multiservice
communication networks [31]. In past years, the services
of such networks were primarily aimed at intensive busi-
ness development, cost optimization, business process
automation, modern management methods, and organiza-
tions [32]. The most effective use of multiservice networks
is found in traditional telecommunications operators, thus
significantly expanding the range of services offered [33].
For the corporate market, unifying all remote segments
into a single pulse service network increases the efficiency
of information transfer by an order of magnitude, ensur-
ing data availability at any time [34, 35]. Thanks to the
ability to exchange large amounts of data between offices,
we can organize conference calls and video conferences
with remote departments [36]. All of this speeds up the
organization’s response to changes and ensures real-time
control of all processes [37].
LITERATURE REVIEW
A multiservice network is a multipurpose environment
designed to transmit voice, images, and data using
packet-switched (IP) technology [8]. It is distinguished
by the reliability characteristics of telephone networks (in
contrast to the non-guaranteed quality of communication
on the Internet) and provides a low transmission cost per
unit of information (closer to the cost of data transmission
on the Internet) [9]. Generally speaking, the main task of
multiservice networks is to ensure the operation of hetero-
geneous information and telecommunication systems and
applications by allowing the transmission of normal traffic
(data) and traffic of other types of information (voice,
video, etc.) in the same traffic environment [20]. A single
infrastructure is used.
PON is a technology with a common data transmission
medium; therefore, separate streams of information must
be encrypted [21]. This may reduce the effective transfer
rate and not protect the information from physical damage.
Diagnosing problems in the system between separators is
difficult [22].
When choosing a professional installer, it is impor-
tant to remember that network problems are minimized
to ensure proper installation, condition monitoring, and
complete service [23]. Ethernet passive optical network
(EPON), which is based on Ethernet technology, is the
next generation of passive networks. Currently, gigabit
passive optical network (GPON) is the most modern, con-
venient, and promising system for building large branch
networks [24].
GPON is based on the synchronous digital hierarchy
(SDH) platform [generic framing procedure (GFP) proto-
col] and allows up to 64 subscribers to connect to one
transmitting module at a distance of 20 km [25]. The use
of splitters and connectors increases the range to 60 km.
The average transfer speed reaches 2.5 Gb, although it
is technically possible to create a system that can reach
speeds of 4–10 Gb/s in each direction [26].
In particular, it lacks specific TDM support, timing, and
security switching functions. Such a system works well
for smaller operators that focus on Internet protocol (IP)
traffic, including IPTV. In general, the choice of technology
to build or upgrade a passive fiber-optic network depends
on customer conditions, subscriber needs, and develop-
ment opportunities [35]. The installer should thoroughly
examine the original data in order to select the technology
and create an optimal plan for the future PON [36].
Often, a tree-like PON network topology is used for
residential premises. It optimizes fiber utilization by plac-
ing as many subscribers as possible on one cable [37].
Depending on the final number of users and the needs of
the network, the stream can be branched into one or more
layer levels [38].
With fewer numbers, it is easier to maintain the system
and perform necessary repairs, and there is less loss in
speed and data volume for the end user [39]. However,
a multilevel system allows the creation of precise settings
that make the network more responsive to customer needs.

Synchronous Transmission in Communication Networks 49
PROPOSED MODEL
Heterogeneity is an inherent quality of any large computer
network, and system integrators and administrators spend
their time reconciling disparate components. Therefore,
any approach that promises the possibility of reducing net-
work heterogeneity attracts intense interest from network
experts. ATM technology was created to serve as a unified
global transport for a new generation of integrated service
networks.
Multiservice networks can be built more fundamen-
tally based on different technologies, an IP platform
[IP virtual private network (VPN)], and dedicated com-
munication channels. At the backbone level, the most
popular technologies today are IP/multiprotocol label
switching (MPLS), packet over SONET/SDH, point of sale
(POS), ATM, xGE, dense wavelength-division multiplex-
ing (DWDM), coarse wavelength-division multiplexing
(CWDM), and RPR. In fact, today most of the backbone
multiservice networks are built on the basis of POS and
DWDM technologies, which are noticeable in Russia, as
well as IP/MPLS, which are considered especially promis-
ing for a large coverage area and a large number of people.
According to the developers’ plans, the uniformity pro-
vided by ATM, a transport technology, can provide the
following several capabilities: these are shown in Figure 1.
• The transmission of computer and multimedia (voice,
video) traffic within a transport system is sensitive
to delays, and the quality of service for each type of
traffic corresponds to its requirements;
• Hierarchy of data transfer rates from tens of megabits
to several gigabits per second with guaranteed band-
width for mission-critical applications;
• Common transport protocols for local and global
networks;
• Preserving the existing infrastructure of physical
channels or physical protocols: T1/E1, T3/E3, SDH
STM-n, and FDDI; and
Transmission
of computer
Hierarchy of
data transfer
Transport
protocols
Physical
protocols
Legacy
protocols
Figure 1. Capabilities of proposed model.
Figure 2. Passive optical network.
• Communication with legacy protocols of local and
global networks: IP, systems network architecture
(SNA), Ethernet, and ISDN.
The proposed model combines the approaches of two
technologies—packet switching and circuit switching. The
former resulted in the adoption of addressable packet data
transmission, while the latter resulted in the use of smaller
fixed-size packets, resulting in more predictable network
delays. It is possible to transmit different types of traffic in
the same network by using the virtual circuit technique,
preordering the parameters of the channel’s quality of
service, and prioritizing the service of virtual circuits with
different quality of service.
Although ISDN networks were designed to carry differ-
ent types of traffic within the same network, voice traffic
was clearly a priority for developers. ATM technology has
been developed since its inception as a technology capable
of serving all types of transportation according to their
needs. Any PON has three main components:
• Station terminal optical line terminal (OLT);
• Passive optical splitter; and
• Subscriber terminals are optical network termination
(ONT) or optical network unit (ONU).
Figure 2 demonstrates the PON infrastructure. The OLT
transceiver connects the PON to external networks and
receives the stream sent to the subscribers via the cable
network. A splitter multiplies the signal by 8, 16, 32, or 64
subscribers.
Each branch shortens the transmission channel some-
what, giving some signal attenuation and reducing
its bandwidth. The terminal subscriber equipment is
equipped with the interfaces required by the user, includ-
ing outputs for IP telephony, Ethernet, and Wi-Fi. A mul-
tiservice network opens up many opportunities to build
a wide variety of redundant services on top of the global
transport environment—from pocket telephony to interac-
tive TV and Internet services. The new-generation network
has the following features:
• Universal nature serving various applications;
• Independence from the technologies of communica-
tion services and flexibility in obtaining the package,
volume, and quality of services; and

• Complete transparency of relationship between ser-
vice provider and users.
Integration of heterogeneous data and speech traffic
allows us to qualitatively improve the efficiency of infor-
mation support for enterprise management; at the same
time, the use of an integrated transport environment
reduces the costs of building and operating the network.
A multiservice network uses a single channel to transmit
different types of data, minimizes the variety of equipment,
uses uniform standards and technologies, and centrally
manages the communication environment. Many service
networks support services such as telephone and fax
communication, allocated digital channels with a fixed
transmission rate, packet data transfer (FR) with required
quality of service, image transfer, video conferencing, TV,
on-demand services, IP phones, broadband Internet access,
the interface of remote LANs operating in various stan-
dards, and the creation of user-modifiable virtual corporate
networks.
Multiservice networks is a technological theory or a new
approach to understanding the current role of telecom-
munications, given that computers and data take prece-
dence today compared to voice communication. Built on
next-generation broadband communications, this business
model enables a wide range of services and the flexibility to
build, manage, and customize them. The main differences
between such networks are as follows:
• The ability to transmit very large amounts of informa-
tion to a large number of users in real time using the
necessary synchronization and complex connection
configurations;
• Intelligence (service, call, and connection control by
user or service provider, separate billing, and condi-
tional access control);
• Variation of access (system of access to services
regardless of the technology used);
• The complexity of the service (the possibility of sev-
eral providers participating in the provision of the
service and dividing their responsibility and income
according to the type of activity of each).
The major issues limiting the spread of broadband access
today and the introduction of multiple service networks
require significant investments in the industry. Let’s not
forget about “theft” and IP enforcement. After all, the fight
against fraud requires a business model based on content
sales with complex management systems, access control,
and billing.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The proposed multiservice model (MSM) was compared
with the existing data gathering and incident response
model (DGIRM), array signal synchronous transmis-
sion method (ASSTM), symbol-synchronous transmission
(SST), and many-to-many data sharing (M2MDS).
Figure 3. Comparison of transfer rate management.
Figure 4. Comparison of multimodal transport management.
Transfer rate management: PON supports speeds from
155 Mbps to 2.5 Gbps, enabling the fastest data transfer at
the moment. Protection against voltage surges: unlike sys-
tems using twisted pair (FTTH, etc.), PON is unaffected by
outside influences and is protected against voltage surges,
pickups, and interference. The comparison of transfer rate
management is shown in Figure 3.
The density of the signal (multiplexing) allows, if neces-
sary, to start additional information streams on the existing
cable—for this, light waves of different lengths are used.
Therefore, the existing cable system can be used to add
services like security systems, video surveillance, security,
fire protection, etc.

Figure 5. Comparison of capacity management.
Figure 6. Comparison of optimum utilization management.
Multimodal transport management: A computer can send
any type of information (data, video, and voice) and infor-
mation flows of any origin to an apartment or office. PON
uses passive tubes that do not require electrical power or
additional maintenance. The development of capabilities,
speed, and cost reduction of components allows this tech-
nology to be considered one of the most promising data
transfer methods. The comparison of multimodal transport
management is shown in Figure 4.
Capacity management: The system can process streams
from multiple sources simultaneously without losing
quality. Multiple computers, TVs, IP phones, etc. can
be connected to one subscriber port. Subscribers are
connected to the network quickly and without communi-
cation interruptions. The comparison of capacity manage-
ment is shown in Figure 5.
Optimum utilization management: Connecting as many
subscribers as possible to a single fiber reduces cable
usage, which can result in significant cost savings. There
is no need to house the equipment for the PON network
in external boxes, so the system is easily accessible for
inspection, modification, and repair during the cold season
and stored in all-weather equipment. The comparison of
optimal utilization management is shown in Figure 6.
The circle of potential users of multiservice networks
is quite extensive. These are, first of all, business centers,
companies located in the same building.
CONCLUSION
In general, the topology is selected from various options
and the actual conditions of the design based on the prin-
ciple of maximum convenience for subscribers. Another
existing change is GEPON technology. It can be called
very economical, but this advantage means some costs in
comparison with GPON networks.
Corporate clients have a lot of demand for telephone
connections, high-speed Internet access, audio and video
conferencing, and alarm and telemetry systems. These are
large holdings with geographically distant branches and
subdivisions, companies that use remote automated ter-
minals (ATMs, vending machines). These are telemedicine
systems of different levels and organizations with mobile
communications, distributed offices, switching centers,
and base stations that can be connected to a multiservice
network.
In addition, our country does not have a powerful
multi-gigabit backbone infrastructure or well-developed
subscriber networks. It is necessary to completely change
the business model for operators, and a large territory
and uneven solution depending on the geography and
population of a particular region require careful selection
of technologies and their combination.
REFERENCES
[1] Logeshwaran, J., Ramkumar, M., Kiruthiga, T., & Sharan Pravin, R.
(2022, February). SVPA – the segmentation based visual processing
algorithm (SVPA) for illustration enhancements in digital video
processing (DVP). ICTACT Journal on Image and Video Processing,
12(3), 2669–2673.
[2] Lloret, J., Garcia, M., Bri, D., & Sendra, S. (2009). A wireless sensor
network deployment for rural and forest fire detection and verifica-
tion. sensors, 9(11), 8722–8747.
[3] Zhong, J. (2022). Communication network array signal synchronous
transmission method based on Gaussian fuzzy algorithm. Wireless
Networks, 28(5), 2289–2298.

[4] Ramesh, G., Logeshwaran, J., & Aravindarajan, V (2022). The Perfor-
mance Evolution of Antivirus Security Systems in Ultra dense Cloud
Server Using Intelligent Deep Learning. BOHR International Journal
of Computational Intelligence and Communication Network, 1(1),
15–19.
[5] Oostvogels, J., Yang, F., Michiels, S., & Hughes, D. (2020, November).
Zero-wire: a deterministic and low-latency wireless bus through
symbol-synchronous transmission of optical signals. In Proceedings
of the 18th Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems
(pp. 164–178).
[6] Sekar, G., Sivakumar, C., & Logeshwaran, J. (2022). NMLA: The
Smart Detection of Motor Neuron Disease and Analyze the Health
Impacts with Neuro Machine Learning Model. NeuroQuantology,
20(8), 892–899.
[7] Saha, S., Landsiedel, O., & Chan, M. C. (2017, June). Efficient many-
to-many data sharing using synchronous transmission and tdma.
In 2017 13th International Conference on Distributed Computing in
Sensor Systems (DCOSS) (pp. 19–26). IEEE.
[8] Ramesh, G., Logeshwaran, J., Gowri, J., & Ajay Mathew (2022).
The management and reduction of digital noise in video image
processing by using transmission based noise elimination scheme.
ICTACT Journal on image and video processing, 13(1), 2797–2801.
[9] Wang, H. (2020). A Synchronous Transmission Method for Array
Signals of Sensor Network under Resonance Technology. Traitement
du Signal, 37(4).
[10] Ramkumar, M., Logeshwaran, J., & Husna, T. (2022). CEA: Certifi-
cation based encryption algorithm for enhanced data protection in
social networks. In Fundamentals of Applied Mathematics and Soft
Computing, Vol. 1, pp. 161–170.
[11] Yu, D., Wang, X., Yu, S., Ye, Z., Fernando, T., & Iu, H. H. (2019). A soft-
PWM approach to power/signal synchronous transmission for SRG-
based DC microgrids. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics,
67(10), 8450–8460.
[12] Hernández, L., Baladron, C., Aguiar, J. M., Carro, B., Sanchez-
Esguevillas, A., Lloret, J., & Cook, D. (2013). A multi-agent system
architecture for smart grid management and forecasting of energy
demand in virtual power plants. IEEE Communications Magazine,
51(1), 106–113.
[13] Harada, S., Hamamoto, Y., Ohta, Y., & Nishino, M. (2004, January).
Development of audio and video synchronous transmission system
based on IEEE802. 11a. In First IEEE Consumer Communications and
Networking Conference, 2004. CCNC 2004. (pp. 316–319). IEEE.
[14] Logeshwaran, J., Malik, J. A., Adhikari, N., Joshi, S. S., & Bishnoi, P.
(2022). IoT-TPMS: An innovation development of triangular patient
monitoring system using medical internet of things. International
Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S5), 9070–9084.
[15] Saravanakumar, K., & Logeshwaran, J. (2016, February). Auto-Theft
prevention system for underwater sensor using lab view. Interna-
tional Journal of Innovative Research in Computer and Communi-
cation Engineering, 4(2), 1750–1755.
[16] Sutharasan, M., & Logeshwaran, J. (2016, May). Design intelligence
data gathering and incident response model for data security using
honey pot system. International Journal for Research & Development
in Technology, 5(5), 310–314.
Tojo, T., & Takizawa, M. (2005, July). Synchronous transmission of
real-time multimedia data in group communication. In 11th Interna-
tional Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems (ICPADS’05)
(Vol. 1, pp. 91–97). IEEE.
[17] Gopi, B., Ramesh, G., & Logeshwaran, J. (2022). An innovation
for energy release of nuclear fusion at short distance dielectrics in
semiconductor model. ICTACT Journal On Microelectronics, 8(3),
1430–1435.
[18] Imaoka, A., & Kihara, M. (1997). Time signal distribution in com-
munication networks based on synchronous digital hierarchy. IEEE
transactions on communications, 45(2), 247–253.
[19] Logeshwaran, J., Saravanakumar, K., Dineshkumar, S., & Arun-
prasath, C. (2016, March). SBML algorithm for intelligent fuel filling
(IFF) and smart vehicle identification system (SVIS). International
Journal of Advanced Research in Management, Architecture, Tech-
nology & Engineering, 2(9), 149–154.
[20] Logeshwaran, J. (2022, March). The control and communication
management for ultra dense cloud system using fast Fourier algo-
rithm. ICTACT Journal on Data Science and Machine Learning, 3(2),
281–284.
[21] Raja, S., Logeshwaran, J., Venkatasubramanian, S., Jayalakshmi, M.,
Rajeswari, N., Olaiya, N. G., & Mammo, W. D. (2022). OCHSA:
Designing Energy-Efficient Lifetime-Aware Leisure Degree Adaptive
Routing Protocol with Optimal Cluster Head Selection for 5G Com-
munication Network Disaster Management. Scientific Programming,
2022.
[22] Raza, U., Stanoev, A., Khoury, C., Pop, A. I., & Sooriyabandara, M.
(2019). Synchronous Transmission Based Flooding over Bluetooth 5.0
for Industrial Wireless Applications. In EWSN (pp. 270–272).
[23] Logeshwaran, J., Rex, M. J., Kiruthiga, T., & Rajan, V. A. (2017,
December). FPSMM: Fuzzy probabilistic based semi morkov model
among the sensor nodes for realtime applications. In 2017 Inter-
national Conference on Intelligent Sustainable Systems (ICISS)
(pp. 442–446). IEEE.
[24] Pountourakis, I. E. (2003). A WDM network architecture with mul-
tiple receivers and a synchronous transmission protocol with con-
straint of data channel collision. Microwave and Optical Technology
Letters, 38(2), 104–108.
[25] Gopi, B., Logeshwaran, J., Gowri, J., & Aravindarajan, V. (2022).
The Identification of quantum effects in electronic devices based
on charge transfer magnetic field model. NeuroQuantology, 20(8),
5999–6010.
[26] Alshammri, G. H., Ahmed, W. K., & Lawrence, V. B. (2018,
December). Synchronous Cooperative Relaying Technique for
Three-Dimensional Diffusion-Based Molecular Nano Communi-
cation Networks. In 2018 IEEE 12th International Conference
on Nano/Molecular Medicine and Engineering (NANOMED)
(pp. 154–159). IEEE.
[27] Zheng, Q., & Shin, K. G. (1993, September). Synchronous bandwidth
allocation in FDDI networks. In Proceedings of the first ACM inter-
national conference on Multimedia (pp. 31–38).
[28] Ghose, D., Tello-Oquendo, L., Pla, V., & Li, F. Y. (2022). On the
Behavior of Synchronous Data Transmission in WuR enabled IoT
Networks: Protocol and Absorbing Markov Chain based Modeling.
IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.
[29] Logeshwaran, J., Ramkumar, M., Kiruthiga, T., & Sharanpravin,
R. (2022). The role of integrated structured cabling system (ISCS)
for reliable bandwidth optimization in high-speed communication
network. ICTACT Journal on Communication Technology, 13(01),
2635–2639.
[30] Boukerche, A., Du, Y., Feng, J., & Pazzi, R. (2008, July). A reliable
synchronous transport protocol for wireless image sensor networks.
In 2008 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications
(pp. 1083–1089). IEEE.
[31] Gopi, B., Logeshwaran, J., Gowri, J., & Kiruthiga, T. (2022). The
moment probability and impacts monitoring for electron cloud
behavior of electronic computers by using quantum deep learning
model. NeuroQuantology, 20(8), 6088–6100.
[32] Logeshwaran, J., & Shanmugasundaram, R. N. (2019, December).
Enhancements of Resource Management for Device to Device (D2D)
Communication: A Review. In 2019 Third International conference
on I-SMAC (IoT in Social, Mobile, Analytics and Cloud)(I-SMAC)
(pp. 51–55). IEEE.
[33] Lloret, J., Sendra, S., Ardid, M., & Rodrigues, J. J. (2012). Underwater
wireless sensor communications in the 2.4 GHz ISM frequency band.
Sensors, 12(4), 4237–4264.

[34] Logeshwaran, J., & Karthick, S. (2022, April). A smart design of a
multi-dimensional antenna to enhance the maximum signal clutch
to the allowable standards in 5G communication networks. ICTACT
Journal on Microelectronics, 8(1), 1269–1274.
[35] Gopi, B., Logeshwaran, J., & Kiruthiga, T (2022). An Innovation in the
Development of a Mobile Radio Model for a Dual-Band Transceiver
in Wireless Cellular Communication. BOHR International Journal
of Computational Intelligence and Communication Network, 1(1),
20–25.
[36] Logeshwaran, J., Adhikari, N., Joshi, S. S., Saxena, P., & Sharma, A.
(2022). The deep DNA machine learning model to classify the tumor
genome of patients with tumor sequencing. International Journal of
Health Sciences, 6(S5), 9364–9375.
[37] Ramesh, G., Logeshwaran, J., Aravindarajan, V., & Feny Thachil.
(2022). Eliminate the interference in 5g ultra-wide band communi-
cation antennas in cloud computing networks. ICTACT Journal On
Microelectronics, 8(2), 1338–1344.
[38] Gopi, B., Ramesh, G., & Logeshwaran, J. (2022). The fuzzy logical
controller based energy storage and conservation model to achieve
maximum energy efficiency in modern 5g communication. ICTACT
Journal on Communication Technology, 13(3), 2774–2779.
[39] Ramesh, G., Aravindarajan, V., Logeshwaran, J., Kiruthiga, T., &
Vignesh, S. (2022). Estimation analysis of paralysis effects for human
nervous system by using Neuro fuzzy logic controller. NeuroQuan-
tology, 20(8), 3195–3206.

The Strategic Analysis and Operation of the Multiservice Model Used for Synchronous Transmission in Communication Networks

More Related Content

Similar to The Strategic Analysis and Operation of the Multiservice Model Used for Synchronous Transmission in Communication Networks (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

The Strategic Analysis and Operation of the Multiservice Model Used for Synchronous Transmission in Communication Networks