This assignment has 3 parts What competencies were you able t.docx
- 1. This assignment has 3 parts: What competencies were you able to develop in researching and writing the Comprehensive Project due in Unit 5? How did you leverage feedback from your peers in the Discussion Board for Units 1- 4 in completing the Project? How will these competencies and knowledge support your career advancement in management? An important skill to possess for risk management is the ability to recognize your own biases. How do you believe this knowledge will assist you in the risk management process? When a risk event occurs in a project what steps do you believe should be taken to address the risk? Provide an example. In your own words, please post a response to the Discussion Board and comment on other postings. You will be graded on the quality of your postings. For assistance with your assignment, please use your text, Web resources, and all course materials. Discussion Board Reminders: Must have 3 posts: A main post and two replies to peers. First post
- 2. : Either your main post or a reply to others must be posted before midnight CT (Central time) on Friday of each week. Second and third post : Must be posted on a different day from the first post. Connect to content : At least 1 post must refer to course learning materials. See the Academic Resource on Discussion Boards for help with connecting to the content. Engaging in class discussions : For more information on making the most of your class dialog, review the Academic Resource on Discussion Boards . Assignment CriteriaProficient DescriptorPoints Quality of Main Post 16 Points Total Student’s main post meets or exceeds the following requirements: Responds completely
- 3. to all of parts of discussion question (4 points) Communicates content information accurately and/or logically (4 points) Delivers a thoughtful response demonstrating insights and reflections (4 points) Connects to both key content concepts and personal experiences (4 points) /16 pts. Response to Peers 16 Points Total Responds to a minimum of 2 peers (8 points per response) Substantive
- 4. response (4 points) Furthers the conversation with peers. Examples could include (4 points): Provides additional resources Connects to key concepts Shares personal or professional experiences Contributes new information or perspective Presents a competing viewpoint /16 pts. Support from Learning Resources 4 Points Total At least one post refers to course learning resources./4 pts.
- 5. Professional Writing 4 points Response is well-organized, clear, and free of grammatical and mechanical errors. Posts demonstrate courtesy and respect for others. /4 pts. Total40 points possible /40 pts. NEED HELP? FACULTY Sladan Sinanovic Looking for tutoring?Free, online, 24/7 tutoring on a variety of subjects. Go to Smarthinking >>