SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Under the
surface and far
apart:
Hidden disagreements in globally
dispersed teams
David Drabble
Introduction to study
– Globalisation, nationalism and lockdowns
– Idea of ‘hidden discord’
– Research question:
– How does hidden discord impact on the effectiveness of globally
dispersed teams?
– Also wanted to understand conditions where it flourishes, types of
hidden discord, and how it can be mitigated, managed and utilised
– Critical incident methodology
Challenges to globally dispersed
teams
“Everything's sort of a step removed from
us as well because we're very far away,
and have no control of the situation”
(Zachary)
Virtual team context
“I frequently fail to realise that
I need to be writing much
simpler English, make things
much clearer than I sometimes
do” (Elliot)
Patterns of communication
“You send some information,
ask for responding but there's
no responding” (Daoming)
Power and contestation
Virtual team context
– Dispersal: the more virtual a team is the larger decrease in
performance in terms of task completion (Schweitzer and
Duxbury, 2010)
– Language and culture: splits in teams can occur by language
diversity (Hinds et al, 2014) and language proficiency (Vigier
and Spencer-Oatey, 2018), but only activated when
triggered by an event such as a power struggle
– Tolerance: linguistically diverse teams often display
tolerance for language difference expressed through
accommodation (Henderson, 2005)
Patterns of
communication
– Channel specific communication: some media support
conveyance of new information (information transmission) and
convergence on shared meaning (information processing)
(Dennis et al, 2008)
– Clash of com habits: speech rituals vary by native language
spoken and clashes in habits can leave people confused,
uncomfortable and embarrassed (Henderson, 2005)
– Collaboration: a shared identity, aligned interests and
congruent practices can result in fruitful cross-national
collaboration (Orlikowski, 2002; Earley and Mosakowski, 2000)
Power and contestation
– Basic disagreements: team members have different starting
positions
– Organisational contestation: Conflict can occur when
personal ties in a virtual team become antagonistic,
especially in collaborations (Lee and Panteli, 2010)
– Disempowerment: Team relations are highly sensitive to
power relations (Tenzer and Pudelko, 2017), for instance
language proficiency is a source of power (Tenzer and
Pudelko, 2017)
Typology of
hidden discord
– Hidden discord describes situations when there is an
intersubjective deficit in a team regarding opinions or
understandings
– So a misunderstanding or disagreement which is hidden
(purposefully or not)
What’s a
misunderstanding?
Typology of
hidden discord
Types of
misunderstandings
Example of unrealised
misunderstanding
– Translation of a document
– “we had a project concerning terms in fires and fire and medical rescue. And we work
together with two universities, one in Greece and one in Slovakia and they thought
they were perfect. But at the end… all the translation[s] they came up [with], they
were not very known and [not] very useful for people in the fields” (Clovis interview)
Example of damaging
misunderstanding
– Marketing strategy
– “[I]n the face-to-face meeting, [Maria] produced something that was totally
irrelevant…. [That] actually ended up in pretty much a shouting match. The [Project
Manager] was shouting at [Maria], much to the dismay of pretty much everyone. It
was quite violent” (Rosa interview)
Example of contained
misunderstanding
– Mistaken identity
– “[the project manager] sent out a message commenting negatively something that had
happened. And I understood it was a comment on me. So I reacted very defensive. But in
fact it was aimed at someone else… We clarified it was not at me. But it was, you know,
not easy” (Bianca interview).
Why were these
misunderstandings happening?
– Immediate triggers:
1. Poor initial communications
2. Lack of clarification cycles
– Reluctance to admit uncertainty
– Underlying conditions
1. Difficulties managing distance
2. Linguistic/communication skill
3. Disempowerment
Typology of
hidden discord
Types of
hidden
disagreements
Example of clash of assumptions
– Conflict over a partner’s role
– “In this case these things for me became a nightmare, yeah, because we were using
the same words with different meanings. And I remember this happened many times
at the beginning of the project” (Anna interview)
Example of undiscussed
disagreement
– Disagreement over a leadership role
– “So everybody saw me as the big boss…. Whereas, in my mind, I mean, frankly, my
expectation was that [the project manager] was going to run it…. He could have
perfectly done it, but it didn't work…. He totally did not communicate clearly at all.
No, I had to-- I think that partly maybe he was embarrassed…. I don't think we
resolved it, to be honest, entirely. I mean, resolved it in the sense that I took over. I
feel terribly resentful, obviously” (Beatrice interview)
Example of repressed conflict
– Conflict over a partner’s role
– “[W]e were always against them…. I guess from [the Project Director’s] perspective, it
was very annoying also, because we were always pointing our finger against them, so
at a certain point, she said, "Please, let us relax a bit. It's not possible to go on like
this." And so we had to stop” (Bianca)
Why were these hidden
disagreements happening?
– Immediate triggers:
1. Lack of discussion
2. Lack of clarification cycles
– Reluctance to increase friction
– Underlying conditions
1. Clash of communication habits and culture gaps
2. Weak interpersonal relationships
3. Organisational contestation
Impact of hidden discord
– Emotional impact – shame, anxiety and anger
– Inefficiency
– Different pathways depending on management
– Sensemaking  Address underlying issues
– Unable to compromise  Splits in team
– Possible to loop back towards sensemaking
Managing
hidden discord
What I’ve learnt
– When remote, it is more difficult to enter clarification cycles and so more
misunderstandings occur
– Tendency to ‘split’ in response to incidents – reject the bad object, scapegoat,
form a core group or distrust cultural outsiders
– All incidents can be helpful if engaged to understand and address underlying
issues
– Importance of multiple perspectives when analysing disagreements and
misunderstandings
Any questions?
Group discussions
– Have you noticed more under-surface dynamics (such as hidden disagreements
or misunderstandings) in your teams since lockdowns?
– What do you put this down to?
– How have you dealt with these?

More Related Content

PPTX
The art of not knowing' Marian Timmermans
PPTX
Everyday life, policy and research: Older people and social exclusion
PPTX
Emotional Labour: Exploring the impact of repeated bereavements for staff in ...
POTX
The challenge of blending spirituality with organisational demands
PPTX
Safe Conversations & Academic Advising
PPT
CALP deep democracy webinar
PDF
Size matter? LTHE week 6 about teaching
PDF
Self-Reflection
The art of not knowing' Marian Timmermans
Everyday life, policy and research: Older people and social exclusion
Emotional Labour: Exploring the impact of repeated bereavements for staff in ...
The challenge of blending spirituality with organisational demands
Safe Conversations & Academic Advising
CALP deep democracy webinar
Size matter? LTHE week 6 about teaching
Self-Reflection

What's hot (18)

PDF
Facilitator Training Manual.pdf
PDF
Open to Interpretation: Knowing What You Don't Know About Implicit Bias
PPT
Teambuilding Workshop - ULS Leadership Program
PPT
Role play and simulations eva..
PPTX
Syd Uni Formative Assessment
DOCX
Surviving and thriving at the top: current challenges for CEOs
DOC
Facilitators outdoor input booklet 2006
PPTX
Seeing families through whose eyes?
PPTX
Syd Uni professional learning
PPTX
Role play in training
PPTX
Group discussion-strategies
PDF
Agile2013 Workshop: Learn different leadership styles with Star Wars Coaches
PDF
Psy Video Report.doc
PDF
Social Psychology Video Report
PPT
Role play case study
PDF
Universal self perception social style & versatility profile
PPTX
Tae reflective assignment
PPT
Smallgroupchapter6listeningfall2012
Facilitator Training Manual.pdf
Open to Interpretation: Knowing What You Don't Know About Implicit Bias
Teambuilding Workshop - ULS Leadership Program
Role play and simulations eva..
Syd Uni Formative Assessment
Surviving and thriving at the top: current challenges for CEOs
Facilitators outdoor input booklet 2006
Seeing families through whose eyes?
Syd Uni professional learning
Role play in training
Group discussion-strategies
Agile2013 Workshop: Learn different leadership styles with Star Wars Coaches
Psy Video Report.doc
Social Psychology Video Report
Role play case study
Universal self perception social style & versatility profile
Tae reflective assignment
Smallgroupchapter6listeningfall2012
Ad

Similar to Under the surface and far apart: the dynamics of discord in remote teams (20)

PPT
Kevin Hawkins - conflict - CommcnSchools1.ppt
PDF
Difficult Conversations Summary
PPTX
Team work & performance
PPT
Managing Stress: Communication Skills
PPT
SCC 2012 Impact through dialogue and deliberation
PPTX
Founder Leadership Workshop Feb 2016
PDF
Chapter14 communication skills
PPTX
Founder Leadership Workshop
PPT
Body language
PPTX
Founder Leadership Workshop
PPT
Body language
PPTX
Founder Leadership Workshop
PPTX
Verbal Communication
PPTX
G-3-Verbal-Non-verbal-Cues-in-Conversation-1-Copy.pptx
PPT
Body language
PPTX
Founder Communication Workshop
PPT
Managing Conflict
PPTX
Body talk - Body Language
PPTX
Ch 1 human communication sscopy(1)
PPTX
CONFLICT.pptx
Kevin Hawkins - conflict - CommcnSchools1.ppt
Difficult Conversations Summary
Team work & performance
Managing Stress: Communication Skills
SCC 2012 Impact through dialogue and deliberation
Founder Leadership Workshop Feb 2016
Chapter14 communication skills
Founder Leadership Workshop
Body language
Founder Leadership Workshop
Body language
Founder Leadership Workshop
Verbal Communication
G-3-Verbal-Non-verbal-Cues-in-Conversation-1-Copy.pptx
Body language
Founder Communication Workshop
Managing Conflict
Body talk - Body Language
Ch 1 human communication sscopy(1)
CONFLICT.pptx
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
CISA (Certified Information Systems Auditor) Domain-Wise Summary.pdf
PPTX
Computer Architecture Input Output Memory.pptx
PPTX
TNA_Presentation-1-Final(SAVE)) (1).pptx
PDF
1_English_Language_Set_2.pdf probationary
PDF
Black Hat USA 2025 - Micro ICS Summit - ICS/OT Threat Landscape
PPTX
Onco Emergencies - Spinal cord compression Superior vena cava syndrome Febr...
PDF
My India Quiz Book_20210205121199924.pdf
PDF
BP 704 T. NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS (UNIT 1)
PDF
Τίμαιος είναι φιλοσοφικός διάλογος του Πλάτωνα
PDF
Trump Administration's workforce development strategy
PDF
medical_surgical_nursing_10th_edition_ignatavicius_TEST_BANK_pdf.pdf
PDF
RTP_AR_KS1_Tutor's Guide_English [FOR REPRODUCTION].pdf
PPTX
Introduction to Building Materials
PPTX
ELIAS-SEZIURE AND EPilepsy semmioan session.pptx
PPTX
Chinmaya Tiranga Azadi Quiz (Class 7-8 )
PDF
Chinmaya Tiranga quiz Grand Finale.pdf
PPTX
Introduction to pro and eukaryotes and differences.pptx
PPTX
Virtual and Augmented Reality in Current Scenario
PDF
Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment .pdf
PPTX
Unit 4 Computer Architecture Multicore Processor.pptx
CISA (Certified Information Systems Auditor) Domain-Wise Summary.pdf
Computer Architecture Input Output Memory.pptx
TNA_Presentation-1-Final(SAVE)) (1).pptx
1_English_Language_Set_2.pdf probationary
Black Hat USA 2025 - Micro ICS Summit - ICS/OT Threat Landscape
Onco Emergencies - Spinal cord compression Superior vena cava syndrome Febr...
My India Quiz Book_20210205121199924.pdf
BP 704 T. NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS (UNIT 1)
Τίμαιος είναι φιλοσοφικός διάλογος του Πλάτωνα
Trump Administration's workforce development strategy
medical_surgical_nursing_10th_edition_ignatavicius_TEST_BANK_pdf.pdf
RTP_AR_KS1_Tutor's Guide_English [FOR REPRODUCTION].pdf
Introduction to Building Materials
ELIAS-SEZIURE AND EPilepsy semmioan session.pptx
Chinmaya Tiranga Azadi Quiz (Class 7-8 )
Chinmaya Tiranga quiz Grand Finale.pdf
Introduction to pro and eukaryotes and differences.pptx
Virtual and Augmented Reality in Current Scenario
Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment .pdf
Unit 4 Computer Architecture Multicore Processor.pptx

Under the surface and far apart: the dynamics of discord in remote teams

  • 1. Under the surface and far apart: Hidden disagreements in globally dispersed teams David Drabble
  • 2. Introduction to study – Globalisation, nationalism and lockdowns – Idea of ‘hidden discord’ – Research question: – How does hidden discord impact on the effectiveness of globally dispersed teams? – Also wanted to understand conditions where it flourishes, types of hidden discord, and how it can be mitigated, managed and utilised – Critical incident methodology
  • 3. Challenges to globally dispersed teams “Everything's sort of a step removed from us as well because we're very far away, and have no control of the situation” (Zachary) Virtual team context “I frequently fail to realise that I need to be writing much simpler English, make things much clearer than I sometimes do” (Elliot) Patterns of communication “You send some information, ask for responding but there's no responding” (Daoming) Power and contestation
  • 4. Virtual team context – Dispersal: the more virtual a team is the larger decrease in performance in terms of task completion (Schweitzer and Duxbury, 2010) – Language and culture: splits in teams can occur by language diversity (Hinds et al, 2014) and language proficiency (Vigier and Spencer-Oatey, 2018), but only activated when triggered by an event such as a power struggle – Tolerance: linguistically diverse teams often display tolerance for language difference expressed through accommodation (Henderson, 2005)
  • 5. Patterns of communication – Channel specific communication: some media support conveyance of new information (information transmission) and convergence on shared meaning (information processing) (Dennis et al, 2008) – Clash of com habits: speech rituals vary by native language spoken and clashes in habits can leave people confused, uncomfortable and embarrassed (Henderson, 2005) – Collaboration: a shared identity, aligned interests and congruent practices can result in fruitful cross-national collaboration (Orlikowski, 2002; Earley and Mosakowski, 2000)
  • 6. Power and contestation – Basic disagreements: team members have different starting positions – Organisational contestation: Conflict can occur when personal ties in a virtual team become antagonistic, especially in collaborations (Lee and Panteli, 2010) – Disempowerment: Team relations are highly sensitive to power relations (Tenzer and Pudelko, 2017), for instance language proficiency is a source of power (Tenzer and Pudelko, 2017)
  • 7. Typology of hidden discord – Hidden discord describes situations when there is an intersubjective deficit in a team regarding opinions or understandings – So a misunderstanding or disagreement which is hidden (purposefully or not)
  • 11. Example of unrealised misunderstanding – Translation of a document – “we had a project concerning terms in fires and fire and medical rescue. And we work together with two universities, one in Greece and one in Slovakia and they thought they were perfect. But at the end… all the translation[s] they came up [with], they were not very known and [not] very useful for people in the fields” (Clovis interview)
  • 12. Example of damaging misunderstanding – Marketing strategy – “[I]n the face-to-face meeting, [Maria] produced something that was totally irrelevant…. [That] actually ended up in pretty much a shouting match. The [Project Manager] was shouting at [Maria], much to the dismay of pretty much everyone. It was quite violent” (Rosa interview)
  • 13. Example of contained misunderstanding – Mistaken identity – “[the project manager] sent out a message commenting negatively something that had happened. And I understood it was a comment on me. So I reacted very defensive. But in fact it was aimed at someone else… We clarified it was not at me. But it was, you know, not easy” (Bianca interview).
  • 14. Why were these misunderstandings happening? – Immediate triggers: 1. Poor initial communications 2. Lack of clarification cycles – Reluctance to admit uncertainty – Underlying conditions 1. Difficulties managing distance 2. Linguistic/communication skill 3. Disempowerment
  • 17. Example of clash of assumptions – Conflict over a partner’s role – “In this case these things for me became a nightmare, yeah, because we were using the same words with different meanings. And I remember this happened many times at the beginning of the project” (Anna interview)
  • 18. Example of undiscussed disagreement – Disagreement over a leadership role – “So everybody saw me as the big boss…. Whereas, in my mind, I mean, frankly, my expectation was that [the project manager] was going to run it…. He could have perfectly done it, but it didn't work…. He totally did not communicate clearly at all. No, I had to-- I think that partly maybe he was embarrassed…. I don't think we resolved it, to be honest, entirely. I mean, resolved it in the sense that I took over. I feel terribly resentful, obviously” (Beatrice interview)
  • 19. Example of repressed conflict – Conflict over a partner’s role – “[W]e were always against them…. I guess from [the Project Director’s] perspective, it was very annoying also, because we were always pointing our finger against them, so at a certain point, she said, "Please, let us relax a bit. It's not possible to go on like this." And so we had to stop” (Bianca)
  • 20. Why were these hidden disagreements happening? – Immediate triggers: 1. Lack of discussion 2. Lack of clarification cycles – Reluctance to increase friction – Underlying conditions 1. Clash of communication habits and culture gaps 2. Weak interpersonal relationships 3. Organisational contestation
  • 21. Impact of hidden discord – Emotional impact – shame, anxiety and anger – Inefficiency – Different pathways depending on management – Sensemaking  Address underlying issues – Unable to compromise  Splits in team – Possible to loop back towards sensemaking
  • 23. What I’ve learnt – When remote, it is more difficult to enter clarification cycles and so more misunderstandings occur – Tendency to ‘split’ in response to incidents – reject the bad object, scapegoat, form a core group or distrust cultural outsiders – All incidents can be helpful if engaged to understand and address underlying issues – Importance of multiple perspectives when analysing disagreements and misunderstandings
  • 25. Group discussions – Have you noticed more under-surface dynamics (such as hidden disagreements or misunderstandings) in your teams since lockdowns? – What do you put this down to? – How have you dealt with these?