Use of electronic information resources and academic performance of university teachers a case study

European Journal of Business and Management www.iiste.org
ISSN 2222-1905 (Paper) ISSN 2222-2839 (Online)
Vol.5, No.14, 2013
46
Use of Electronic Information Resources and Academic
Performance of University Teachers: A case study
N.Sivathaasan
Assistant Librarian, Main Library, University of Jaffna, Sri Lanka
Email: sivathas27@gmail.com
Prof. (Dr).T.Velnampy
Dean/Faculty of Management Studies & Commerce, University of Jaffna, Sri Lanka,
Email: tvnampy@yahoo.co.in
Abstract
Electronic Information Resources (e-resources) play an important role in teaching and learning process at
university level and provide superior assistance to its users. The main objective of this study is to identify the
impact of usage of e-resources on academic performance of the university teachers. As this study was limited to
the university teachers, working at the University of Jaffna, Sri Lanka, Stratified random sampling technique
were adopted to select a sample from each of the five different faculties in proportion to the actual size of the
group in the total population. The study employs correlation and regression model to test the operational
hypotheses and results revealed that usage of e-resources has a strong positive association with academic
performance (r = 0.623, p < 0.01). Multiple regression analysis showed that the usage of e-resources has an
impact on academic performance at the rate of 38.8 % (R2
= 0.388), which is statistically significant at the levels
of 0.01 (p < 0.01). This study would absolutely benefit the research scholars through exploring impact of usage
of e-resources on academic performance.
Keywords: Electronic Information Resources, Academic Performance, University Teachers.
1. Introduction
E-resources are the source of information (Thanuskodi, 2012). They can be simply defined as resources that
include documents in electronic or e-format that can be accessed via Internet. They are available in various
forms like e-books, digital libraries, online journal, magazine, e-learning tutors, on line test e-journals, e-
discussions, e-news, data archives and e-mail on line chatting and deliver a collection of data, be it text, image
collection, other multimedia products like numerical, graphical mode. Online dictionary of library and
information science (2004) defines electronic information as material consisting of data and/or computer
program(s) encoded for reading and manipulation by a computer, by use of a peripheral device directly
connected to the computer such as a CD-Rom drive or remotely via network such as the internet. The category
includes software applications, electronic texts, bibliographic databases, institutional repositories, web sites, e-
books, collections of e-journals, etc. Electronic resources are easily accessible in the remote areas and solve
storage problems and control the flood of information (Munira Nasreen Ansari and Bushra, 2010). This has
increased the global dissemination of information. Electronic resources such as e-books, full-text e-journals and
online bibliographic databases must be subscribed by academic libraries to meet ever-increasing demands from
users for remote access to information (Alan Armstrong, Vicki, Victoria, and Edward, ---). There are several
forms and types of electronic resources which are available on the internet, some of the popular ones that are
gaining ground are the electronic journals, standards, technical specifications, reports, patents, full text articles,
trade reports and hosts of other (Dhanavandan, Mohammed Esmail, S and Nagarajan, 2012).
Performance can be defined as continuous improvement of the employees in an organization. This depends on
the productivity of employees. If they are productive, they perform well and achieve the targets of the
organization. The productivity consists of both effectiveness and efficiency and both have relation with each
other. University teaching is a profession that demands continuous learning, teaching and contribution towards
creation of new knowledge particularly through research during the career (Senaratne, 2007). Academic
performance is the outcome of education the extent to which a student, teacher or institution has achieved their
educational goals. Further, it refers to how students deal with their studies and how they cope with or accomplish
different tasks given to them by their teachers. It is the ability to study and remember facts and being able to
communicate knowledge verbally or down on paper.
2. Research Problem
E-Resources are used not only by university teachers, but also by students, employees of government and private
sector organizations, scientist and others for a multitude of reasons. The digital information environment has
dramatically changed the way that users access information worldwide (Brinley Franklin). Even though most of

Vol.5, No.14, 2013
47
the academic members in the University are using electronic resources, their performance levels are varying.
Sometimes, people who have less usage of electronic resources perform well on their job. This study seeks to
evaluate the relationship and the impact of usage of electronic resources on academic performance of university
teachers performing at the University of Jaffna.
3. Objective of Study
The main objective of the study is to evaluate the usage of e-resources and academic performance of university
teachers and sub objectives are:
• To identify the relationship between use of e-resources and academic performance of the university
teachers
• To find out the impact of use of e-resources on academic performance of the university teachers.
4. Review of Literature
As an emerging field, Information technology has facilitated by providing electronic and internet resources for
fulfilling the day to day academic and research requirements of the teachers (Manoj Kumar, Gauri, and Bimal,
2011). A number of literature studies have been made on use of e- resources by lecturers, research scholars and
students world-wide. Ali (2005) found out that 83% of students survey felt that using this source saved them
time, and found it relatively easy to use. Ojo and Akande (2005) in a survey of 350 respondents examined
students’ access, usage and awareness of electronic information resources at the University College Hospital
(UCH) Ibadan, Nigeria. The study revealed that the level of usage of the electronic information resources is not
high. According to Thanuskodi (2012), the majority of users are aware about the availability of e-resources. The
result reveals that 47.78 % of respondents wanted to access only electronic version whereas only 32.78% users
wanted to read the printed journals but 19.44% respondents wanted to use both electronic and printed version.
Majority of the respondents 76.66% used e-resources for writing papers. The analysis reveals that many of the
respondents searched e-resources through linking facility available on the library website. Moreover, many of
the respondents are unaware and have not used On-line thesis/dissertations, abstracts/indexes, OPAC, on-line
databases, which are very relevant for their study and research. Bashorun (2011) revealed by research that
frequency of use of electronic resources by academic staff of the University of Ilorin was low. Reasons were lack
of time. Because of the time required to focus on teaching; lack of awareness to electronic resources provided by
the library; power outage, ineffective communication channels, slow network and inadequate searching skills.
Rehman and Ramzy (2004) investigated the awareness and use of electronic information resources among health
academics. Results show that libraries are extensively used for research needs, preparation of lectures, and for
obtaining current knowledge.
There are several studies made across the world to identify numerous factors which measure performance.
Velnampy (2008) indentified ten factors which determine the performance of an employee such as completion of
work within stipulated time, independent work, creativity, innovation, initiative skill, discipline, turn over,
absenteeism, competition and training. Further, he found the factors influencing performance of academicians of
University of Jaffna such as demonstrated academic ability, academic potential, creativity, oral expression,
initiative skill, perseverance, ability to work independently, and professional ability. These factors were ranked
based on mean value. Some studies on the use of electronic information and academic performance (Day and
Bartle, 1998) reveal that the academic community has accepted that electronic information sources have an
impact on their work. So, there is a relationship between electronic information sources and academic work.
On the other hand, William Allan Prescott and others (2012) concluded that usage of e-device was not associated
with academic performance (p = 0.70), when second and third year pharmacy students were combined.
Academic performance was not impacted among third year pharmacy students (p = 0.86), but second year
students performed better academically if they refrained from using e-devices during class (mean grade = 88.5%
vs. 83.3%; p=0.019). Self-efficacy and use of electronic information jointly predict and contribute significantly
to academic performance of students (Adeyinka Tella, Ayeni, and Omoba, 2007). According to McFarlin (2008),
for educational technology to be effective, student learning and outcomes must be the focus of its
implementation and use. The provision of low-cost and easy-to-create online resources quantitatively enhanced
students’ academic performance: students who accessed the online resources achieved greater academic success
(Andrea Crampton, Angela, and Heather, 2012). Ekundayo and Alonge (2012) studied that human and material
resource availability does not influence students’ academic performance both in public and private secondary
schools. Studies have also been carried out on the use of electronic resources by teachers, students, and research
scholars of universities and research organizations. Seventy-eight percent (78%) of the respondents feel that the
use of e-journals has created high dependency value on their research work and they needed current article alert
services and electronic document supply services (Madhusudhan, 2008). Okello Obura and Magara (2008)
investigated that users derived a lot of benefits from electronic resources gaining access to a wider range of

Vol.5, No.14, 2013
48
information and improved academic performance as a result of access to quality information. Velnampy (2008)
analyzed relationship between satisfaction, involvement and employee performance of 220 employees from
fourteen public sector organizations in Jaffna district, Sri Lanka and revealed that attitudes namely satisfaction
and involvement, and performance are significantly correlated. Further, correlation between involvement and
performance is somewhat higher than the correlation among satisfaction and performance and satisfaction,
performance, and involvement are associated and inter-related and together lead to the realization of
organizational objectives. Occupational stress can affect the performance through organizational
commitment(Velnampy and Aravinthan, 2013).
The present study seeks to fill knowledge gaps in the research literature by examining the usage of e-resources
and to find out how these resources play a role to improve the academic performance of the university teachers.
Previously no significant study has probed the issue of e-recourses and its impact on academic performance of
University of Jaffna, Sri Lanka.
5. Conceptual Model and Hypotheses
The following conceptual model was formulated to depict the relationship between variables. Definition for
electronic information resources given by the online dictionary of library and information science (2004) has
been used to design the model.
Figure 1: Conceptual Model
Further, the following hypotheses are formulated in the present study.
H1 –There is an association between usage of e-resources and academic performance of the university teachers.
H2 – The usage of e-resources has an impact on academic performance of teachers of University of Jaffna.
6. Methodology
6.1. Population
The researcher considered all academic staff members teaching at the University of Jaffna, Sri Lanka as total
population for this study. This survey was conducted during March to April 2013 and data were collected on
variables related to the use of e-resources and academic performance. Total population was two hundred and
ninety four (294) university teachers as per the database of Academic Establishment Branch, University of Jaffna
as of 5th
April 2013.
ACADEMIC
PERFORMANC
SOFTWARE
APPLICATION
ONLINE
JOURNAL
ONLINE
DATABASE
INSTITUTIONAL
REPOSITORIES
E-BOOKS & E-
JOURNALS
WEBSITES
USAGE OF E-
RESOURCES
RESEARCH
ACTIVITIES
TEACHING &
LEARNING
SOCIAL
CONTRIBUTIO
OTHERS

Vol.5, No.14, 2013
49
Table 1: Total Number of University Teachers
6.2. Sampling Procedure
As this study was limited to the university teachers, working at the University of Jaffna, Sri Lanka, Stratified
random sampling technique was adopted to select a sample from each of the five different faculties in proportion
to the actual size of the group in the total population. Thus, out of five faculties, it was decided to collect data
from 30% from each of the selected sampling unit. Following table shows the sample size determined for the
purpose of data collection.
Table 2: Number of Teachers Selected as a Sample
The researchers gathered 81 questionnaires, yielding a response rate of 92 per cent. Finally, 75 (which is 85 per
cent) questionnaires were fully and correctly completed and all data collection procedures were designed to
ensure the anonymity. Table 3 provides a summary of respondents who returned the questionnaires as per the
researcher’s expectation.
Table 3: Number of Respondents by Faculty Wise
6.3. Instrument Development
To evaluate the usage of e-resources and academic performance, a survey instrument in the form of self-
administered questionnaire was developed for the purpose of collecting the main data for the study. The
questions are mainly related to the factors which determine the use of e-resources and academic performance of
university teachers. This instrument is composed of three parts such as Part A, Part B and Part C. Part A of the
questionnaire has the personal profile of the academic staff which mainly indicate name of the faculty in which
they are working, gender, marital status, age group, designation, experience, monthly earnings, language in
which they are teaching and academic qualification. Part B is used to find out the use of e-resources which
consist of ten statements. Part C of the instrument includes eleven statements to measure the academic
performance which is influenced by the use of e-resources. Each of the variables was measured on a five-point
Likert scale ranging from “strongly agree”, 4 indicated “agree” to “disagree”.
6.4. Data Collection and Mode of Analysis
Tool was self developed by the researchers and pilot testing was done. The researcher excluded the five
respondents who were initially used for the validation of the instrument and questionnaire was pretested to check
for its clarity and redesigned to address the objectives of the assessment. Primary and secondary data are used for
the study. Primary data have been collected through the questionnaire, and secondary data collected from the
books, journals, magazines, etc. Further, various statistical methods have been employed to analyze data
No Faculties Total Population
1 Faculty of Agriculture 22
2 Faculty of Arts 124
3 Faculty of Management Studies & Commerce 31
4 Faculty of Medicine 46
5 Faculty of Science 71
Total Number of University Teachers 294
No Faculties Total Population
Sampling with scale of
30 % of staff
1 Faculty of Agriculture 22 7
2 Faculty of Arts 124 37
3 Faculty of Management Studies & Commerce 31 9
4 Faculty of Medicine 46 14
5 Faculty of Science 71 21
Total Number of Sample 294 88
Faculties Frequency Percent
1 Faculty of Agriculture 7 9.3
2 Faculty of Arts 30 40.0
3 Faculty of Management Studies & Commerce 9 12.0
4 Faculty of Medicine 10 13.3
5 Faculty of Science 19 25.3
Total Number of Questionnaires Returned 75 100.0

Vol.5, No.14, 2013
50
collected from 75 respondents from various faculties. A well known statistical package called “SPSS” (Statistical
Package for Social Science) 16.0 version is used to analyze data the researcher collected.
7. Results and Discussion
7.1. Reliability and Durbin -Waston Range
The internal reliability of the items was verified by computing the Cronbach’s alpha. This value may vary from 0
to 1. Malhotra (2000) and Cronbach (1951) suggested that satisfactory value of alpha is required to be more than
0.6 for the scale to be reliable. According to the table 4, overall and individual Alpha values are greater than 0.6.
Therefore, variables used in this study deemed to have adequate reliability.
Table 4: Reliability Statistics
The acceptable Durbin-Watson range is between 1.5 and 2.5. In this analysis, Durbin-Watson of 1.909, which is
between the acceptable ranges, shows that there was no auto correlation problems in the data used in this
research.
Table 5: Test of Collinearity
7.2. Correlation and Regression Analysis
Correlation analysis was carried out to find out the relationship between use of e-resources and academic
performance of the university teachers. Use of e-resources is measured using ten components whereas academic
performance is measured using eleven components. The result of correlation analysis is given in table 6.
According to the table, correlation value of 0.623 which is significant at 0.01 levels. It means that there is a
positive relationship between use of e-resources and academic performance.
Table 6: Correlation Matrix for use of e-resources and academic performance
Variable Correlation/Probability Use of E-Resources Academic Performance
Use of E-
Resources
Pearson Correlation 1 .623**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000
Academic
Performance
Pearson Correlation .623**
1
Sig. (2-tailed) .000
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
The multiple regression analysis was performed to investigate the impact of the independent variable on the
dependent variable. The table 7 provides a summary of the results retrieved from regression model.
Table 7: Regression Model Results
Model R R2
Adjusted R2
Std. Error of Coefficient t-Statistics Prob.
The Estimate
1 623a
388 .380 . 40459 .514 6.808 .000
a. Predictors: (Constant): Use of E-Resources b. Dependent Variable: Academic Performance
The specification of an independent variable (use of e-resources) in this model reveals that the ability to predict
the academic performance of university teachers. R square value of .388, which is in the model, denotes that
38.8 % of observed variability in academic performance can be explained by the differences in the independent
variables. Remaining 61.2 % variance in the academic performance of university teachers is related to other
variables which are not mentioned in the model as they are outside the scope of the study. R2
value indicates that
there may be number of variables, which can have an impact on academic performance of the university teachers
that need to be studied. Hence, this area is indicated as a scope for future research. At the above model, t-
statistics is 6.808, which is significant at the 0.01 levels (p < 0.01). The significant level explains that we can
observe a high degree of certainty (greater than 99.9%) in use of e-resources. Use of e-resources and academic
performance of the university teachers have a positive co efficient (beta=.514), which means that use of e-
Variables No of Elements Alpha Coefficient Value(s)
Use of E-Resources 10 .768 (overall)
Use of E-Resources 10 Ranging from .712 to .799 (individual)
Variables No of Elements Durbin-Waston Range
Use of E-Resources 10 1.909

Vol.5, No.14, 2013
51
resources increases with increasing level of academic performance.
The summary of data analysis is given below through the hypotheses testing that have been formulated for this
study.
Table 8: Hypotheses Testing
Hypothesis Results Tools Used Statistical Significant
H1 Accepted Correlation Analysis Significant (r = 0.623, p < 0.01)
H2 Accepted Regression Analysis Significant (R2
= 38.8 %, p < 0.01)
8. Conclusion
The study has investigated that the relationship between use of e-resources and academic performance of
university teachers and how far the usage of e-resources contributed towards the academic performance. Based
on stratified sampling, eighty eight university teachers have been invited to respond the survey and study
employed correlation and regression analysis to attain the objectives. Correlation analysis indicated that the
usage of e-resources has a strong positive association (r =0.623) with academic performance of the university
teachers. Whereas this finding is in line with what was previously reported by Day and Bartle (1998), William
Allan Prescott and others’ (2012) findings do not agree with the researcher. Multiple regression analysis in the
research revealed that the academic performance has been contributed by the usage of e-resources at the rate of
38.8 %, which is significant at the levels of 0.01 (p < 0.01).
9. References
1. Adeyinka,T., Tella, A., Ayeni, C.O. and Omoba, R.O. (2007). Predictors of Academic Performance: Self-
Efficacy and use of Electronic Information. University of Dar Es Salaam Library Journal, 9 (1): 69-83.
2. Alan Armstrong, E., Vicki, F.C., Victoria, T.K. and Edward, F.L. Electronic resources access: issues and
resolutions in two academic libraries [Online]. Available at:
https://research.wsulibs.wsu.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/2376/2025/Armstrong%20Electronic%20resources
.pdf?sequence=1.
3. Ali, N. (2005). The use of electronic resources at IIT Delhi Library; a study of search behaviours. The
Electronic Library, 23(6): 691 – 700.
4. Andrea, C., Angela, T. R. and Heather, C. (2012). Cross-discipline investigation of the relationship between
academic performance and online resource access by distance education students. The Journal of the
Association for Learning and Technology, 20: 1-14.
5. Bashorun, M., Tunji, I. A. and Adisa, M.Y. (2011). User perception of electronic resources in the
University of Ilorin, Nigeria (UNILORIN). Journal of Emerging Trends in Computing and Information
Sciences, 2(11): 554- 562.
6. Brinley, F. Measuring the impact of Networked Electronic Services (MINES): The North American
Experience [Online].
7. Cronbach, L.J. 1951. Coefficient alpha and the internet structure of tests. Psychometrika. 6(2): 297-334.
8. Day, J. and Bartle, C. (1998). The Internet as an electronic information service: its impact on academic
staff in higher education [online]. Available at
http://www.intute.ac.uk/socialsciences/archive/iriss/papers/paper06.htm
9. Dhanavandan, S., Mohammed Esmail, S. and Nagarajan, M. (2012). Use of Electronic Resources at
Krishnasamy College of Engineering & Technology Library, Cuddalore [Online]. Library Philoshopy and
Practice.
10. Ekundayo,H.T. and Alonge,H.O. (2012). Human and material resources as correlates of academic
performance of private and public secondary school students in Ondo state, NIGERIA. European Scientific
Journal, 8 (10): 170-180.
11. Ismail.M.B.M and Velnampy.T.(2012), A case study approach to human resource planning-HRP-in
weaving industry of Maruthamunai, Researcher world, Journal of arts science and commerce,III(10): 122-
130.
12. Manoj Kumar, S., Gauri, S. and Bimal, S. (2011).Usage of electronic resources available under UGC-
INFONET Digital Library Consortium by Assam University Library Users. Proceedings of 8th
International
CALIBER. Goa University: March 02-04.
13. Madhusudhan, M. (2008). Use of UGC infonet – journals by the Research Scholars of University of Delhi”,
Library Hi Tech, 26( 3): 369 – 386.
14. Malhotra, N.K. 2000. Marketing research: an applied orientation, Pearson education Delhi, India Asia,

Vol.5, No.14, 2013
52
New, 3rd
edition.
15. McFarlin, B.K.(2008). Hybrid lecture-online format increases student grades in an undergraduate
exercise physiology course at a large urban universit. Advanced Physiology Education, 32(1): 86-
91.
16. Munira, N.A. and Bushra, A.Z.(2010). Use of Electronic Resources among Academics at the University of
Karachi. Library Philosophy and Practice [online].
17. Ojo, R. A. and Akande, S. O. (2005). Students access, usage and awareness of electronic information
resources at the University College Hospital, University of Ibadan, Nigeria. Lagos. Journal of Library and
Information Science, 3(1): 16 – 24.
18. Okello-Obura, C. and Magara, E. (2008). Electronic information access and utilization by Makerere
University in Uganda [online]. Available at: http;//creative commons.org/licenses/by/2-0.
19. Peiris, N.D. and Peiris, B.L. (2012). Use of electronic information resources by postgraduate students: a
case study. Journal of the University Librarians' Association of Sri Lanka. 16(1): 46-69.
20. Rehman, S., & Ramzy, V. (2004). Awareness and use of electronic information resources at the Health
Science Centre of Kuwait University. Library Review, 53 (3): 150-156.
21. Senaratne, C. (2007). Personality and job performance of university teachers in Sri Lanka [Online].
Available at: http://journals.sjp.ac.lk/index.php/icbm/article/view/794
22. Thanuskodi, S.(2012). Use of Online Public Access Catalogue at Annamalai University Library.
International Journal of Information Science, 2(6): 70-74.
23. Velnampy, T. (2008). Job attitude and employees performance of Public Sector Organizations in Jaffna
District,Sri Lanka. GITAM Journal of Management, 6(2): 1-11.
24. Velnampy, T. (2008). Empowerment management. Jaffna: Guru Printers.
25. Velnampy.T and Aravinthan.S.A.(2013), Occupational stress and organizational commitment in private
banks: A Sri Lankan experience,European Journal of Business and management,5(7): 254-267
26. William Allan Prescott and Others. (2012). Impact of electronic device use in class on Pharmacy Students’
Academic Performance [online]. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3508481/

This academic article was published by The International Institute for Science,
Technology and Education (IISTE). The IISTE is a pioneer in the Open Access
Publishing service based in the U.S. and Europe. The aim of the institute is
Accelerating Global Knowledge Sharing.
More information about the publisher can be found in the IISTE’s homepage:
http://www.iiste.org
CALL FOR PAPERS
The IISTE is currently hosting more than 30 peer-reviewed academic journals and
collaborating with academic institutions around the world. There’s no deadline for
submission. Prospective authors of IISTE journals can find the submission
instruction on the following page: http://www.iiste.org/Journals/
The IISTE editorial team promises to the review and publish all the qualified
submissions in a fast manner. All the journals articles are available online to the
readers all over the world without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than
those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself. Printed version of the
journals is also available upon request of readers and authors.
IISTE Knowledge Sharing Partners
EBSCO, Index Copernicus, Ulrich's Periodicals Directory, JournalTOCS, PKP Open
Archives Harvester, Bielefeld Academic Search Engine, Elektronische
Zeitschriftenbibliothek EZB, Open J-Gate, OCLC WorldCat, Universe Digtial
Library , NewJour, Google Scholar

Use of electronic information resources and academic performance of university teachers a case study

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Similar to Use of electronic information resources and academic performance of university teachers a case study (20)

More from Alexander Decker (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Use of electronic information resources and academic performance of university teachers a case study