Validity and reliability of information on the Internet:
Teacher demonstration: Intermediate
A curriculum for critical thinking and web research                          This plan is part of a
                                                                          critical thinking and web
Skill level: Intermediate
                                                                             research curriculum
School level: Middle school (11–13 years old)                          developed by the International
                 High school (14–18 years old)                       Society for Technology in Education
                                                                            (ISTE) and Microsoft.

Accuracy of content                                                 www.microsoft.com/ education/criticalthinking

     The Internet is a fantastic medium for publishers of all
     kinds. Anyone with minimal technological skills can create a website and share information
     with the world. However, just because someone knows how to publish on the web does not
     necessarily mean that the information they publish is accurate. Students must learn to
     explore a website and investigate the site’s accuracy before taking the information on that
     site at face value.
     Teachers should lead students through a discussion regarding the accuracy of web pages,
     paying particular attention to the following topics:
         1. Who publishes the site?
             Remember, you generally can find out who the author of a page is and whether that
             author is part of a larger organization or group responsible for the overall site. For
             example, a webpage with one individual author who does not appear to have
             published elsewhere, does not have other websites, or is not part of a larger
             information source might be questionable. How would we know that someone didn’t
             make a one-time webpage just to vent about a particular topic? What if an author
             simply put together a temporary page meant to persuade readers on a current
             political issue?

         2. Are there other sources with similar content?
             Students may be tempted to only follow or use the information provided in the very
             first site that appears in their search results. However, it is important to encourage
             students to use multiple sources of information. This not only provides them with
             a well-rounded view of the topic at hand, but it’s also an opportunity to weigh
             each site’s content against other sites. This can help eliminate biased sources or
             outdated information. By using multiple sources of information and by comparing
             and contrasting those sources, users are more likely to end up with the most
             accurate data.
3. Web address endings (.gov, .org, .net, for example)
          It is not uncommon for students to make assumptions about website accuracy based
          on the site type. You may hear students suggest that a .com (commercial) site would
          be more accurate, because those sites are typically commercial and not run by a
          single individual. On the other hand, some would suggest that an .org (organization)
          site would be more objective and accurate, because there may be no commercial
          motive. Generally speaking, a site type is not a good indicator for a site’s worthiness
          as part of the research process.

     4. Accuracy and verifiability of webpage content
          Remember, verifying the author and publisher of a webpage is a first step in finding
          accurate and reliable information. However, one must also read and review the
          content and look for cues that might indicate the level of accuracy beyond just the
          author or sponsor of a webpage.


Visit a site like www.nationalgeographic.com, and lead students through the
following discussion:
     ♦ If you were doing a research project about animals, would this site give you any
       indication that it provides accurate information? How would you know?
     ♦ Is this a site you’ve heard of before? Is the site part of a larger organization that you
       would consider a trusted source?
     ♦ In case you’d like to ask the author for additional information, is there contact
       information on the site?
     ♦ If there are photos or other media files, are they current? Do they make sense relative
       to the text found on the page?
     ♦ Do you find correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation?
     ♦ Are there references to other work or research or to other credible sites?
     ♦ Are the hyperlinks on the page still active?
     ♦ Do the hyperlinks point to other sites that also appear accurate?
     ♦ Generally speaking, would you feel comfortable making research decisions based on
       what you read at this site?


Visit us on the web at www.microsoft.com/education/criticalthinking.
Microsoft and Bing are trademarks of the Microsoft group of companies.
The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.
© 2010 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

More Related Content

PDF
The abc of website evaluation
PPT
Helping kids learn through research
PPT
Helping kids learn_through_research[1]
PPTX
Dean r berry Determining the Credibility of Sources
PPTX
Dean r berry a determining the credibilitey of sources final 2 27
PPT
Website Evaluation
PPT
How Does This Fit My Need: Improving student research processes by changing t...
PPTX
Making use of online resourse for research
The abc of website evaluation
Helping kids learn through research
Helping kids learn_through_research[1]
Dean r berry Determining the Credibility of Sources
Dean r berry a determining the credibilitey of sources final 2 27
Website Evaluation
How Does This Fit My Need: Improving student research processes by changing t...
Making use of online resourse for research

What's hot (20)

PPTX
Website Evaluation Lesson
 
PPTX
Finding and Evaluating Sources
PPT
Improving The Research Habits Of Students
PPTX
Evaluating sources for credibility
PDF
The Transition Years: Evaluating Info Lit Skills from High School to College-...
KEY
Ietc presentation
PDF
Source Credibility
PPT
Plagiarism Ppt Teachers
DOCX
Internet Investigators Lesson
PPT
PPT
Online sourceselementary
PPTX
Lesson 4: Evaluating Sources
PPTX
Presentation has Typo2
PPT
Credible sources of information
PDF
Evaluating websites
PPSX
PPT
Evaluating Web Sources For Research
PPT
Evaluating internet sources
PPT
Reliable resources powerpoint
PPT
Teachingtensteps
Website Evaluation Lesson
 
Finding and Evaluating Sources
Improving The Research Habits Of Students
Evaluating sources for credibility
The Transition Years: Evaluating Info Lit Skills from High School to College-...
Ietc presentation
Source Credibility
Plagiarism Ppt Teachers
Internet Investigators Lesson
Online sourceselementary
Lesson 4: Evaluating Sources
Presentation has Typo2
Credible sources of information
Evaluating websites
Evaluating Web Sources For Research
Evaluating internet sources
Reliable resources powerpoint
Teachingtensteps
Ad

Similar to Validity teacher demo_intermediate (20)

DOC
Validity student handout1
DOC
Validity lessonplan intermediate
PDF
Evaluating Web Resources
PPT
Evaluating internet sites with info on how search engines work
PPTX
Ict seminar ppt
PDF
TSEM Fa 2012 Class1b McArthur
PDF
TSEM Fa 2012 Class1a McArthur
DOCX
Intro2 tech rubric
PDF
Class 1-become-an-online-sleuth
PPT
Research project lesson
PDF
Web site
PPTX
Evaluating Internet Information
PPT
Crit Eval Part 2
PPTX
Locating reliable resources
PDF
4mi examining the credibility of information on
PDF
4mi examining the credibility of information on
PPT
Research and web evaluation
PPT
Research and web evaluation
PPTX
Evaluating Information Sources
PPTX
Website Evaluation V2.pptx
Validity student handout1
Validity lessonplan intermediate
Evaluating Web Resources
Evaluating internet sites with info on how search engines work
Ict seminar ppt
TSEM Fa 2012 Class1b McArthur
TSEM Fa 2012 Class1a McArthur
Intro2 tech rubric
Class 1-become-an-online-sleuth
Research project lesson
Web site
Evaluating Internet Information
Crit Eval Part 2
Locating reliable resources
4mi examining the credibility of information on
4mi examining the credibility of information on
Research and web evaluation
Research and web evaluation
Evaluating Information Sources
Website Evaluation V2.pptx
Ad

More from thinkict (20)

PPTX
Photostory
ODT
Open Office Impress : Lesson 08
DOCX
Open Office Calc : Level1
ODT
Open Office Calc : Lesson 07
DOCX
Open Office Calc : Level 1
ODT
Open Office Calc : Lesson 06
ODT
Open Office Calc : Lesson 05
ODT
Text Writer
DOCX
Open Office Writer : Level2
DOCX
Open Office Writer : Level1
ODT
Open Office Writer : Lesson 03
ODT
Open office Writer : Lesson 02
XLSX
Marking Grid_Web Communications
XLSX
Marking Grid_Computer Operations
XLSX
Marking Grid_AlphaTech
DOCX
Web Communications Brochure
DOCX
Internet Operations Brochure
DOCX
Computer Operations Brochure
DOC
AlphaTech Brochure
PPT
Internet Operations
Photostory
Open Office Impress : Lesson 08
Open Office Calc : Level1
Open Office Calc : Lesson 07
Open Office Calc : Level 1
Open Office Calc : Lesson 06
Open Office Calc : Lesson 05
Text Writer
Open Office Writer : Level2
Open Office Writer : Level1
Open Office Writer : Lesson 03
Open office Writer : Lesson 02
Marking Grid_Web Communications
Marking Grid_Computer Operations
Marking Grid_AlphaTech
Web Communications Brochure
Internet Operations Brochure
Computer Operations Brochure
AlphaTech Brochure
Internet Operations

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
AI-driven educational solutions for real-life interventions in the Philippine...
PDF
Mucosal Drug Delivery system_NDDS_BPHARMACY__SEM VII_PCI.pdf
PDF
Vision Prelims GS PYQ Analysis 2011-2022 www.upscpdf.com.pdf
PPTX
Computer Architecture Input Output Memory.pptx
PDF
semiconductor packaging in vlsi design fab
PDF
Empowerment Technology for Senior High School Guide
PDF
Skin Care and Cosmetic Ingredients Dictionary ( PDFDrive ).pdf
PDF
HVAC Specification 2024 according to central public works department
PPTX
Unit 4 Computer Architecture Multicore Processor.pptx
PDF
LIFE & LIVING TRILOGY - PART (3) REALITY & MYSTERY.pdf
PDF
ChatGPT for Dummies - Pam Baker Ccesa007.pdf
PPTX
Introduction to pro and eukaryotes and differences.pptx
PPTX
Virtual and Augmented Reality in Current Scenario
PDF
BP 505 T. PHARMACEUTICAL JURISPRUDENCE (UNIT 2).pdf
PDF
BP 704 T. NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS (UNIT 1)
PDF
BP 704 T. NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS (UNIT 2).pdf
PDF
Journal of Dental Science - UDMY (2021).pdf
PPTX
Education and Perspectives of Education.pptx
PDF
BP 505 T. PHARMACEUTICAL JURISPRUDENCE (UNIT 1).pdf
PDF
Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment .pdf
AI-driven educational solutions for real-life interventions in the Philippine...
Mucosal Drug Delivery system_NDDS_BPHARMACY__SEM VII_PCI.pdf
Vision Prelims GS PYQ Analysis 2011-2022 www.upscpdf.com.pdf
Computer Architecture Input Output Memory.pptx
semiconductor packaging in vlsi design fab
Empowerment Technology for Senior High School Guide
Skin Care and Cosmetic Ingredients Dictionary ( PDFDrive ).pdf
HVAC Specification 2024 according to central public works department
Unit 4 Computer Architecture Multicore Processor.pptx
LIFE & LIVING TRILOGY - PART (3) REALITY & MYSTERY.pdf
ChatGPT for Dummies - Pam Baker Ccesa007.pdf
Introduction to pro and eukaryotes and differences.pptx
Virtual and Augmented Reality in Current Scenario
BP 505 T. PHARMACEUTICAL JURISPRUDENCE (UNIT 2).pdf
BP 704 T. NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS (UNIT 1)
BP 704 T. NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS (UNIT 2).pdf
Journal of Dental Science - UDMY (2021).pdf
Education and Perspectives of Education.pptx
BP 505 T. PHARMACEUTICAL JURISPRUDENCE (UNIT 1).pdf
Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment .pdf

Validity teacher demo_intermediate

  • 1. Validity and reliability of information on the Internet: Teacher demonstration: Intermediate A curriculum for critical thinking and web research This plan is part of a critical thinking and web Skill level: Intermediate research curriculum School level: Middle school (11–13 years old) developed by the International High school (14–18 years old) Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) and Microsoft. Accuracy of content www.microsoft.com/ education/criticalthinking The Internet is a fantastic medium for publishers of all kinds. Anyone with minimal technological skills can create a website and share information with the world. However, just because someone knows how to publish on the web does not necessarily mean that the information they publish is accurate. Students must learn to explore a website and investigate the site’s accuracy before taking the information on that site at face value. Teachers should lead students through a discussion regarding the accuracy of web pages, paying particular attention to the following topics: 1. Who publishes the site? Remember, you generally can find out who the author of a page is and whether that author is part of a larger organization or group responsible for the overall site. For example, a webpage with one individual author who does not appear to have published elsewhere, does not have other websites, or is not part of a larger information source might be questionable. How would we know that someone didn’t make a one-time webpage just to vent about a particular topic? What if an author simply put together a temporary page meant to persuade readers on a current political issue? 2. Are there other sources with similar content? Students may be tempted to only follow or use the information provided in the very first site that appears in their search results. However, it is important to encourage students to use multiple sources of information. This not only provides them with a well-rounded view of the topic at hand, but it’s also an opportunity to weigh each site’s content against other sites. This can help eliminate biased sources or outdated information. By using multiple sources of information and by comparing and contrasting those sources, users are more likely to end up with the most accurate data.
  • 2. 3. Web address endings (.gov, .org, .net, for example) It is not uncommon for students to make assumptions about website accuracy based on the site type. You may hear students suggest that a .com (commercial) site would be more accurate, because those sites are typically commercial and not run by a single individual. On the other hand, some would suggest that an .org (organization) site would be more objective and accurate, because there may be no commercial motive. Generally speaking, a site type is not a good indicator for a site’s worthiness as part of the research process. 4. Accuracy and verifiability of webpage content Remember, verifying the author and publisher of a webpage is a first step in finding accurate and reliable information. However, one must also read and review the content and look for cues that might indicate the level of accuracy beyond just the author or sponsor of a webpage. Visit a site like www.nationalgeographic.com, and lead students through the following discussion: ♦ If you were doing a research project about animals, would this site give you any indication that it provides accurate information? How would you know? ♦ Is this a site you’ve heard of before? Is the site part of a larger organization that you would consider a trusted source? ♦ In case you’d like to ask the author for additional information, is there contact information on the site? ♦ If there are photos or other media files, are they current? Do they make sense relative to the text found on the page? ♦ Do you find correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation? ♦ Are there references to other work or research or to other credible sites? ♦ Are the hyperlinks on the page still active? ♦ Do the hyperlinks point to other sites that also appear accurate? ♦ Generally speaking, would you feel comfortable making research decisions based on what you read at this site? Visit us on the web at www.microsoft.com/education/criticalthinking. Microsoft and Bing are trademarks of the Microsoft group of companies. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners. © 2010 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.