Variable speed control for 2Ph-HSM in RGS: a comparative simulation study

International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE)
Vol. 10, No. 3, June 2020, pp. 2285~2295
ISSN: 2088-8708, DOI: 10.11591/ijece.v10i3.pp2285-2295  2285
Journal homepage: http://ijece.iaescore.com/index.php/IJECE
Variable speed control for 2Ph-HSM in
RGS: a comparative simulation study
Salam Waley Shneen, Mohammed Qasim Sulttan, Manal Hadi Jaber
Energy and Renewable Energies Technology Center, University of Technology, Iraq
Article Info ABSTRACT
Article history:
Received Jun 12, 2019
Revised Nov 24, 2019
Accepted Dec 1, 2019
There are many applications of two-phase hybrid stepping motor (2Ph-HSM)
system. The robotic grinding system (RGS) one of these applications.
In this work, under the title variable speed control. The aim is Simulink
the 2Ph-HSM in RGS with a proportional-integral controller (PIC) and
optimization unit such as Genetic Algorithm (GA) which tuning PIC as
(GA_PIC) to improve the RGS action by improving the parameters of PIC.
Also comparing the act of PIC and GA_PIC to see which state is the best.
The simulation results of this work show the GA_PIC is the best that
comparative with PIC.
Keywords:
2Ph-HSM
GA
GF
PIC
RGS Copyright © 2020 Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science.
All rights reserved.
Corresponding Author:
Salam Waley Shneen,
Energy and Renewable Energies Technology Center,
University of Technology,
52 Industry street, Baghdad, Iraq.
Email: salam_waley73@yahoo.com & 50054@uotechnology.edu.iq
1. INTRODUCTION
The two-phase hybrid stepping motor (2Ph-HSM) system one of the machine drive system (MDS)
that can be using in robotic grinding system (RGS) [1]. The proportional–integral controller (PIC) [2, 3] one
of the classical controllers that can be using with MDS. The Genetic Algorithm (GA) [4-6] one of the optimal
controller system that can be using with MDS [7]. This work uses Matlab to simulate the RGS including,
2Ph-HSM, control unit PIC and optimal controller system GA. RGS is a promising technicality to generate
the final form of the required design. It can keep the human from taking part in noisy and dirty environments,
get better product quality, and slash production expenses [8]. Some fieldwork formerly showed a difficulty in
grinding the complicated form in workpiece like a marine propeller or turbine blade which requires
the end-effector of a manipulator to hold over a stable connect force with the environment while the grinding
tool moving along the workpiece. To carry out such a job and at the one time, both the strength and location of
the robot should be controlled. Those control systems were classified into two major strategies, hybrid control
for the force/position, and impedance control. Those strategies need a careful dynamic pattern of
the manipulator and interaction of contact strength. In a strategy of a hybrid control for force/position, only
natural trend path is undergoing a constant pressure or strength control, and this has some advantages like,
the first is the dimensional change is compensated automatically because of the tool corrosion, and second is
the accuracy on the planned path is relaxed since the confirmed connect from the strength control loop will
offset the program error [9].
The PIC is a conventional controller and commonly used in many industrial processes. In the practical
field, the hardware systems have non-controllable properties like the high order and non-linearity, so the good
methods of PI tuning are more suitable from other methods. The PIC performance can be determined by many
methods such as trial and error method, Ziegler–Nichols numeral method and the development mechanisms

 ISSN: 2088-8708
Int J Elec & Comp Eng, Vol. 10, No. 3, June 2020 : 2285 - 2295
2286
based on searching. The numerical worth of the PI controller profits counts on the estimates of the motor [10].
The Ziegler– Nichols method provided a methodical tuning to the PI parameters Which is characterized by
a good reduction in pregnancy disorder, but with a long time for stability and great overshoot, it exhibits
frustrating performance. To improve the performance of such systems, many studies are seeking to merge
features on the footing of the experiences of particularist with consideration to PI gain, and the utilize of GA
appears to be especially proper [11]. The implementation of modern optimization techniques such as GAs,
it is a technique of searching best solutions at a sensible reckoning cost without being able to warranty either
probability or optimality, or even in many cases to clarify how close to optimality an especially suitable
solution [12].
In [13] the authors did a comparison between a classic PID controller and the Fuzzy-PID controller
and they are got good results when reducing the value of setting time and the maximum overshoot value which
mean that the performance of the fuzzy-PID controller is best than classic PID algorithm. In [14], the work
achieved good performance when used PSO-PI controller than the Fuzzy-PI controller and traditional PI
controller to control to robotic Grinding Force (GF) with use the 2-ph hybrid stepping motor. the authors used
Matlab/Simulink to simulate the methods of control. The authors in a paper [15] used some intelligent methods
to optimizing the PID controller such as ANN, ANFIS, and GA. The simulation results have appeared a good
performance for intelligent methods than the classic ZN method in terms of different performance properties.
The paper [16] shows the importance and effect of GAs to optimizing of control processes, also discusses
the connotation and design execution of GA as an optimization gadget. The authors used the Matlab/Simulink
to execute the models of this work. The simulation results showed a good optimization of GA controllers than
fuzzy logic and classical controllers. The work [17] used two techniques to evaluate the performance of
the PID controller, the differential evolution DE and GA. Two methods used to evaluate DE and GA, mean
square error (MSE) and integral absolute error (IAE). The work achieved a good comparison between
the performance of the GA-PID controller and DE-PID controller with the Ziegler-Nichols method.
In this work, the PIC is utilized as the control unit to controlling to RGS work and utilize from GA to
tune the parameters of PIC as GA_PIC to optimizing the act of control unit which controls in 2Ph-HSM and
GF. The rest of the paper is organized as follows: in section 2 the description of GF controlling in RGS.
Section 3 illustrates the 2Ph-HSM in RGS into two parts, the mathematical and simulation model of
the 2Ph-HSM system respectively. The controlling and optimization of the plant is clarified in section 4 by two
sides the PIC and the GA_PIC optimization in 4.1 and 4.2 respectively. The simulation of results is discussed
in section 5. Section 6 includes conclusion and future works.
2. THE GF CONTROLLING IN RGS
The GF decompose into three component forces, Normal GF (fN), Tangential GF (fT), and the third
force is not significant which is work in the same direction of the Feed Direction (Fd), so it is neglected and
this shown in Figure 1. The fT is mainly affecting on the consuming of power and preserve the lifetime of
grinding wheel. The fN influence on the deformity of the surfaces and the roughness of surfaces [18].
Two sections will compose the Compacting Force (fC), the 2Ph-HSM and a Helix Spring (HS), the machining
surface as a negative congruence. The 2ph-HSM is a brushless DC electric motor which splits a total rotation
to a digit of equal steps [19]. The place of the motor can thereafter be ruled to stir and curb without any feedback
sensor at one of the steps of rotation, while the motor is guardedly sized to the enforcement. The 2ph-HSM is
used to control to controlling instruments with its fittings of high delicacy, less noise, less vibration, cheap
cost, and a rising torque in output [20]. The GF is a mechanical process used to remove rough and very thin
layers of articles on the extrinsic border of the workpiece.
The SM is rapid and executable in many execution hardware. The benefit of SM has increased due to
its best reliability which comes from the elimination of mechanical brushes, and it spins slowly because it has
a higher torque-to-inertia ratio, and also has a better heat squandering because of the windings are existing on
the stator, not the rotor. The SM has a stepping ability that makes it take a good positioning without feedback,
while when using closed-loop control to SM make it achieve fast response times and greater resolution
capabilities. The SM designed to be performed in open-loop, and it can work at high velocity if take into
consideration the nonlinear impacts [21]. When the SM work, it starts to compress on the HS provided the fC
for a force control system, the fC is revealed by two force sensors constitute two orthogonal angles β and α.
According to the data come from the sensors, the linear SM offset is changed and cause a compress on HS to
modify the fN, this can be shown in Figure 2. The controlling of GF is based on the strategy of hybrid
movement-force control when the fN is the surroundings force required, (fM) is referring to the Modifying
Force that changes the adapting the controlling to the force at the needed.

Int J Elec & Comp Eng ISSN: 2088-8708 
Variable speed control for 2Ph-HSM in RGS: a comparative simulation study (Salam Waley Shneen)
2287
Figure 1.Model of the GF servo system
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of a force control system
The force control system is designed as following [22]:
dp =
dg+ds
2
(1)
fN =
Kf(dg+ds)
2
(2)
fT = ρfN (3)
ρ = tan θ (4)
where:
dp : is the precise displacement of the SM at the GF with its coveted value fN,
dg : is the SM greatest displacement,
ds : is the smallest displacement to compress the HS,
Kf : is the elastic modulus of the HS,
Ft : is the Tangential force (set value per unit width), and
𝜌 : is the GF ratio
3. THE 2Ph-HSM IN RGS
In this part, the parameters of the 2Ph-HSM that can be clearly by the model system, the equations
and the simulation model for 2Ph-HSM system as the following:

 ISSN: 2088-8708
2288
3.1. Mathematical Model for 2Ph-HSM system
The 2Ph-HSM system one of the machine drive system (MDS) include two systems the first system
is the electrical and the second is the mechanical system. The electrical system includes the voltage in volt (v),
current in ampere (A), resistance in (Ω) ohm and inductor in Henry (H). Figure 3 shown the equivalent circuit
of HSM. The mechanical system includes the motor torque, friction torque in N.m, rotational inertia, viscous
friction, motor speed and shaft power [23].
Figure 3. The equivalent circuit of HSM
The Transfer Function (T.F) 𝐺(𝑠) for 2Ph-HSM of an open-loop system is calculated as in [24]:
G(s) =A(s) / B1(s) + B2(s) (5)
3.2. Simulation Model for 2Ph-HSM system
This section appears the simulation model of a 2Ph-HSM system. Figure 4 (a) shown the simulation
model without the controller by using constant speed which includes the T.F of RGS, the input system and
the output system. Figure 4 (b) shown the simulation model without the controller by using variable speed
which includes the T.F of RGS, the input system and the output system. Figure 5 (a and b). Shown
the simulation model with the PIC by using constant speed and variable speed respectively includes the T.F of
RGS, PIC, the input and output systems.
The simulation model of a 2Ph-HSM system with an optimum system GA_PIC includes the T.F of
RGS, GA_PIC the input system and the output system is the same model as in Figure 5 (a and b) with an
essential modification by changing the PIC unit by GA_PIC unit. The simulation model of a 2Ph-HSM system
with an optimum system is shown in Figure 6. Figure 7 shown the simulation model of the 2Ph-HSM system
combined for three circuits (without control, with PIC, and with GA_PIC) for constant speed as an input speed
to make the comparison between the output results of these three circuits. The simulation model of a 2Ph-HSM
system combined for three circuits (without control, with PIC, and with GA_PIC) and for variable speed
appears in Figure 8.
Figure 4. The simulation model of 2Ph-HSM system without controller

2289
Figure 5. The simulation model of 2Ph-HSM system with PIC
Figure 6. The simulation model of 2Ph-HSM system with GA_PIC
Figure 7. The simulation model of a 2Ph-HSM system combined for three circuits
(without control, with PIC, and with GA_PIC) and for constant speed

 ISSN: 2088-8708
2290
Figure 8. The simulation model of a 2Ph-HSM system combined for three circuits
(without control, with PIC, and with GA_PIC) and for variable speed
4. CONTROLLING AND OPTIMIZATION FOR THE PLANT
Many methods of controller and optimization used to improve the work of the plant, the idea still
focusing on how to choose the proper method that fit with the working plant which planned to accomplish it.
In our work, used the PIC as a controller unit to control for plant and GA_PIC unit to optimize it, the next
sections illustrate the two units.
4.1 The PIC
Up to now, many of the controllers are PI controllers due to they're soft to grasp [25]. The closed-loop
system with a PIC in the direct path appears in Figure 9. The function of PIC is described as:
𝑦(𝑡) = 𝑒(𝑡)𝐾𝑃 + 𝐾𝐼 ∫ 𝑒(𝑡)𝑑𝑡
𝑡
0
(6)
according to manual expertise, 𝐾𝑃 represents the proportional constant gain and 𝐾𝐼 is the integral constant gain,
𝑒(𝑡) represents the error signal between the reference signal 𝑟(𝑡)and the plant output 𝑦(𝑡), its expounded as
𝑒(𝑡) = 𝑟(𝑡) − 𝑦(𝑡).
Figure 9. The closed-loop system with a PIC of a plant
The (7) is the transfer function that shows the relation between the PIC input E (s) (error signal) and
output U (s) (input to the plant).
𝐺𝑐( 𝑠) =
𝑈(𝑠)
𝐸(𝑠)
= 𝐾𝑃 +
𝐾𝐼
𝑠
(7)

2291
The closed-loop transfer function 𝐺(𝑠) is given by (8):
𝐺( 𝑠) =
𝑌(𝑠)
𝑅(𝑠)
=
𝐺 𝑐(𝑠)𝐺 𝑝(𝑠)
1+𝐺 𝑐(𝑠)𝐺 𝑝(𝑠)
(8)
The adjusting of a PIC consists of choosing gains 𝐾𝑃 and 𝐾𝐼 thus that performance specifications are
satisfied. The 𝐾𝑃 parameter effects on the control system as follow: decrease the rise time, increase
the overshoot, decrease the error, and make a small change in the turning time, while 𝐾𝐼 parameter effects as
follow: decrease the rise time, increase the overshoot, eliminate the error, and increase the turning time [26].
4.2 The GA_PIC Optimization
GA is a heuristic improvement mechanism created by the techniques of natural selection. GA begins
with a premier inhabitance including a number of chromosomes, each chromosome appears as a solution to
a problem in which its action is evaluated depending on the fitness function. according to the suitability of each
individual and its specified probability, a set of chromosomes is chosen to subject three combined
operations: selection, crossover, and mutation. The action of these three combined stages authorizes to create
new individuals to produce better solutions than the parents which lead to the optimal solution. A fulfillment
action of GA_PIC is listed as follows [27].
The best way to implement GA is with a small size for inhabitants in order to permit the PIC to be
optimized as fast as potential. The initial inhabitant is created by encryption the PIC parameters, 𝐾𝑃 and 𝐾𝐼 to
binary series called as a chromosome. The length of a series counts on the wanted accuracy that is about 4 bits.
The desired bit series is calculated according to (9).
2 𝑛−1
< (𝑈𝑏 − 𝐿 𝑏) × 104
≤ 2 𝑛
− 1 (9)
where 𝑛 is the No, bits, 𝑈𝑏 and 𝐿 𝑏 are the upper bounds and lower bounds of PIC parameters.
The evaluation of the suitability of each chromosome by conversion its binary series into real values
as PIC parameter values and put it in an objective function known as the fitness function like the mean square
error (MSE) and integral absolute error (IAE), the converting operation from binary values to real numbers for
each chromosome is done by an encryption process by using (10).
𝐶𝑣 = 𝐿 𝑏 + 𝐷𝑒𝑐(𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑠) ×
(𝑈 𝑏−𝐿 𝑏)
2 𝑛−1
(10)
where 𝐶𝑣 is the real numbers of 𝐾𝑃 and 𝐾𝐼, 𝐷𝑒𝑐(𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑠) represents the decimal values of binary series that
comes from (9).
The target of GA is to search for minimum fitness worth, so each group of PIC parameter is moved
to the fitness function in order to calculate for a prime fitness value as shown in Figure 10. After calculating
the initial fitness values, it goes to the selection operation with its corresponding chromosome. The higher
the value of fitness worth, the greater the chance to choose a member of the inhabitant. The tournament
selection strategy is a better method due to its present a good choosing strategy able to regulate its selective
pressure and inhabitant variety to get better search performance for the GA. In contrast, the strategy of roulette
selection that permits to choose feeble chromosomes in numerous times. The chromosomes leave the selection
operation toward crossover operation, two mating chromosomes are choosing in a random way, one of them
cut-point and another, replace the right section of the two parents to birthing progeny. A one-point crossover
is select for basic GA.
The mutation operation comes after crossover operation, it is blocking the algorithm to fall in the local
minimum and preserve a diversity of the inhabitance. usually, the lowest mutation rate must be chosen while
the greater mutation rate may be changing the searching operation into a random search operation. In the next
generation, and after finishing the three operations (selection, crossover, and mutation), the binary series in
either chromosome in the inhabitance require to be decryption into real values. A new group of PIC is
transmitted to the PIC system to calculate for a new fitness worth. This sequential process passes through
the three operations and reiterated until the generations finishing where better fitness is fulfilled. Figure 10
shows the diagram of GA.

 ISSN: 2088-8708
2292
Figure 10. The diagram of GA
5. THE SIMULATION RESULTS
In this section, the simulation results discuss through Figures 11-13 which we got from the MATLAB/
SIMULINK program, each figure has two parts (a) and (b): part (a) appears the system response at constant
speed, and part (b) appears the system response at variable speed, each part shows the shape of an input signal,
output signal, and the comparative between them, the system response is discussed in three cases: without
control, with PIC, and with GA_PIC. Figure 11 shows the system response without control at constant and
variable speed, the shape appears the response of the system as a worst response compare with the system
response with PIC and GA_PIC due to the high values of rising time=1.44, steady state error=6.5.
Figure 12 shows the system response with PIC at constant and variable speed with 𝐾𝑃=16.54 and
𝐾𝐼=3.86, the shape appears a good response of the system compare with the system response without controller
due to the acceptable values of rising time=0.09, steady state error=0.38, and overshoot=8%. Figure 13 shows
the system response with GA_PIC optimization at constant and variable speed, the values of KP=14.441 and
KI=0.032 at iteration=65 as shown in Figure 14, the shape appears the best response of the system compare
with the response of system with PIC and without controller due to the good values of rising time=0.08, steady
state error=0.28, and overshoot=0%.

2293
Figure 11. The step response of the system without control at (a) constant speed and (b) variable speed
Figure 12. The step response of the system with PIC at (a) constant speed and (b) variable speed
Figure 13. The step response of the system with GA_PIC at (a) constant speed and (b) variable speed

 ISSN: 2088-8708
2294
Figure 14. The optimization tools for GA_PIC
6. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORKS
The grinding process is an important process in the manufacturing field especially when using it in
difficult environments that the people cannot reach it because of the risks or difficulty working in it, therefore,
it becomes necessary to use the robot to overcome those difficulties by controlling this important process by
using classical controllers or intelligent controllers such as PIC or GA_PIC. The controlling on the grinding
process begin when controlling on grinding wheel to make it adapt with the curved surface through improving
the obedient wrist system, this achieves by work of wrist when it changes its position in columnar two trends
to adapted the machining surface according to the HS compressive strength which controlled by the SM.
So, the grinding wheel becomes more proper to grind the free-shape surfaces.
Whilst the controlling parameters were not proper with the position of the wrist and the controlling
system is not able of adjusting the form of the machining surface, the GF can't be controlled at its objective
value and the error increases with the movement of the feed. This signifies that the pattern of the surroundings
and the obedient wrist system can use in strength controlling when robots grind Free surfaces of the fans with
multipoint pieces by a grinding tool. The simulation results of the work are confirming the idea that a GA_PIC
has better control performance than the classical PIC due to the GA is to optimize the PIC behavior to get
convinced control characteristics. The controlling and simulation of 2Ph-HSM achieved by utilizing
the software bundle of the MATLAB program (SIMULINK). The authors suggest using other optimization
methods such as fuzzy logic with PIC and particle swarm optimization with PIC to know how they affect
the control parameters and compare these methods with GA_PIC to knowledge the best one.
REFERENCES
[1] Attiya, A. J., Wenyu, Y., & Shneen, S. W., “PSO_PI Controller of Robotic Grinding Force Servo System,”
TELKOMNIKA Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 515-525, September 2015..
[2] Trujillo, O. A., Toro-García, N., & Hoyos, F. E., “PID controller using rapid control prototyping techniques,”
International Journal of Electrical & Computer Engineering, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 2088-8708, 2019.
[3] Uthman, A., & Sudin, S., “Antenna Azimuth Position Control System using PID Controller & State-Feedback
Controller Approach,” International Journal of Electrical & Computer Engineering, vol. 8, no. 3,
pp. 2088-8708, 2018.

2295
[4] Kashyap, P. K., & Kumar, S., “Genetic-fuzzy based load balanced protocol for WSNs,” International Journal of
Electrical and Computer Engineering, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 1168, 2019.
[5] Zubeiri, I., Morabit, Y. E., & Mrabti, F., “Genetic algorithm for vertical handover (GAfVH) in a heterogeneous
network,” International Journal of Electrical & Computer Engineering, vol. 9, pp. 2088-8708, 2019.
[6] Gulia, P., “Hybrid swarm and GA based approach for software test case selection,” International Journal of Electrical
& Computer Engineering, vol. 9, pp. 2088-8708, 2019.
[7] Wibowo, W. K., & Jeong, S. K., “Genetic algorithm tuned PI controller on PMSM simplified vector control,”
Journal of Central South University, vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 3042-3048, 2013.
[8] Li, W. L., Xie, H., Zhang, G., Yan, S. J., & Yin, Z. P., “3-D shape matching of a blade surface in robotic grinding
applications,” IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 2294-2306, 2016.
[9] Wang, J., Zhang, G., Zhang, H., & Fuhlbrigge, T., “Force control technologies for new robotic applications,”
In 2008 IEEE International Conference on Technologies for Practical Robot Applications, pp. 143-149. IEEE. 2008.
[10] Thangaraj, R., Chelliah, T. R., Pant, M., Abraham, A., & Grosan, C., “Optimal gain tuning of PI speed controller in
induction motor drives using particle swarm optimization,” Logic Journal of the IGPL, vol. 19, no. 2,
pp. 343-356, 2011.
[11] Bekakra, Y., & Attous, D. B., “Optimal tuning of PI controller using PSO optimization for indirect power control for
DFIG based wind turbine with MPPT,” International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management,
vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 219-229, 2014.
[12] Reeves, C. R., “Modern heuristic techniques for combinatorial problems, advanced topics in computer science,”
Modern Heuristic Techniques for Combinatorial Problems: Advanced Topics in Computer Science, 1995.
[13] Zhang, S. Y., & Wang, X. M., “Study of fuzzy-PID control in MATLAB for two-phase hybrid stepping motor,
In Applied Mechanics and Materials,” Trans Tech Publications, vol. 341, pp. 664-667, 2013.
[14] Attiya, A. J., Wenyu, Y., & Shneen, S. W., “Compared with PI, Fuzzy_PI & PSO_PI Controllers of Robotic Grinding
Force Servo System,” TELKOMNIKA Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 65-74, 2015.
[15] Chopra, V., Singla, S. K., & Dewan, L., “Comparative analysis of tuning a PID controller using intelligent methods,
ACTA Polytechnica hungarica,” vol. 1, no. 8, pp. 235-249, 2014.
[16] Malhotra, R., Singh, N., & Singh, Y., “Genetic algorithms: concepts, design for optimization of process controllers,”
Computer and Information Science, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 39, 2011.
[17] Saad, M. S., Jamaluddin, H., & Darus, I. Z., “PID controller tuning using evolutionary algorithms,” Wseas
transactions on Systems and Control, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 139-149, 2012.
[18] ZC Li, B Lin, YS Xu, J Hu., “Experimental studies on grinding forces and force ratio of the unsteady state grinding
technique,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 129, no.76-80, 2002.
[19] Nguyen TD, Tseng KJ, Zhang, S, Nguyen HT., “A Novel Axial Flux Permanent-Magnet Machine for Flywheel
Energy Storage System Design and Analysis,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 58, no. 9,
pp. 3784-3794, 2011.
[20] Zhang Tuanshan, Zhang Na, Wu Yuting., “Study of driving bipolar stepper motors based on enhanced STM32,”
Electronic Measurement Technology, vol. 33, no. 10, 16-18, 2010.
[21] Andrew J Blauch, Marc Bodson, John Chiasson., “High-speed Parameter Estimation of Stepper,” Motors IEEE
Transactions on control systems technology, vol. 1, no. 4, 270-279, 1993.
[22] Attiya, A. J., Wenyu, Y., & Shneen, S. W., “Fuzzy-PID Controller of Robotic Grinding Force Servo System,”
International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE), vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 87-99, 2015.
[23] ZAKY, M. S., ISMAEIL, E. M., & KHATER, M. M., “DSP-based real-time control of a two-phase hybrid stepping
motor,” ACTA Electrotechnica, vol. 51, no. 2, 109-113, 2010.
[24] Attiya, Adnan Jabbar, Yang Wenyu, and Salam Waley Shneen., “Compared with PI, Fuzzy_PI & PSO_PI Controllers
of Robotic Grinding Force Servo System,” TELKOMNIKA Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering, vol. 16,
no. 1, pp. 65-74, 2015.
[25] Cheng-Tsung Lin, Chung-Wen Hung and Chih-Wen Liu., “Fuzzy PI controller for BLDC motors considering
Variable Sampling Effect,” IECON 2007 - 33rd Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society,
Taipei, Taiwan, Nov. 5-8, 2007.
[26] Amaral, J. M., Tanscheit, R., & Pacheco, M. A., “Tuning PID controllers through genetic algorithms,” Complex
Systems, vol. 2, no. 3, 2018.
[27] Shneen, Salam Waley, Chengxiong Mao, and Dan Wang., "Advanced optimal PSO, Fuzzy and PI controller with
PMSM and WTGS at 5Hz side of generation and 50Hz Side of Grid," International Journal of Power Electronics
and Drive Systems, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 173, 2016.

Variable speed control for 2Ph-HSM in RGS: a comparative simulation study

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Similar to Variable speed control for 2Ph-HSM in RGS: a comparative simulation study (20)

More from IJECEIAES (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Variable speed control for 2Ph-HSM in RGS: a comparative simulation study