SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Bryan Nairn, CISSP
Senior Manager, Trustworthy Computing
Microsoft Corporation
bryan.nairn@microsoft.com
Why should I care?
 Server virtualization is now a given in the majority of
  enterprise datacenters – source IDC

 The virtual server and virtual server management
  software market is forecast to reach a market opportunity
  of approximately $4.1 billion by 2014. This represents a
  CAGR of 13.1%. – source IDC

 Over 40% of production virtual machines will be less
  secure than their physical counterparts through 2014 –
  source Gartner
Virtualization powers the cloud
    Private Cloud            Public Cloud

• Mimics public cloud   • Available to anyone
• Benefits enterprise     with a network
  users                   connection
• Highly virtualized    • Pay-as-you-go
• Strings together IT   • Multi-tenant and
  infrastructure into     virtualized
  resources pools       • Self-service portals
Virtualization is a good thing!
Some Common VM Security Myths
 “I only have to patch my host OS / Kernel”
 “If I protect my Host machine, it will protect my
  VMs.”
 “Virtual Hard Disk files are secure by default.”
 “If you expose the virtual machine, you have to
  expose all virtual machines and the host.”
 “All virtual machines can see each other.”
 “I don’t need Anti-Virus with Virtualization”
Protection Rings
Virtualization Architecture- Hypervisor
 Primary Partition                         Child Partitions
 Virtualization Stack
  WMI Provider
                                             Applications
  VM                    VM Worker
  Service               Processes

                                                                               Ring 3
 MinWin                   Virtualization     Virtualization
                                Service      Service
                              Providers      Clients
  Windows                         (VSPs)     (VSCs)                 Guest OS
  Kernel         IHV                                                Kernel
                 Drivers       VMBus         VMBus            Enlightenments
                                                                               Ring 0

 Windows hypervisor                                                            Ring “-1”

                           Server Hardware
Hypervisor Security Assumptions
 Guests are untrusted
 Trust relationships
   Parent must be trusted by hypervisor
   Parent must be trusted by children
 Hypercall interface will be well documented and widely
  available to attackers
 All hypercalls can be attempted by guests
 Can detect you are running on a hypervisor + version
 The internal design of the hypervisor will be well understood
Hypervisor Security Goals
 Strong isolation between partitions
 Protect confidentiality and integrity of guest data
 Separation
        Unique hypervisor resource pools per guest
        Separate worker processes per guest
        Guest-to-parent communications over unique channels

 Non-interference
        Guests cannot affect the contents of other guests, parent, hypervisor
        Guest computations protected from other guests
        Guest-to-guest communications not allowed through VM interfaces
Hyper-V Isolation
 No sharing of virtualized devices
 Separate VMBus per VM to the parent
 No sharing of memory
    Each has its own address space
 VMs cannot communicate with each other, except through
  traditional networking
 Guests can’t perform DMA attacks because they’re never
  mapped to physical devices
 Guests cannot write to the hypervisor
 Parent partition cannot write to the hypervisor
Hyper-V Security Hardening
 Hypervisor has separate address space
   Guest addresses != Hypervisor addresses
 No 3rd party code in the Hypervisor
 Limited number of channels from guests to
  hypervisor
   No “IOCTL”-like things
 Guest to guest communication through hypervisor is
  prohibited
 No shared memory mapped between guests
 Guests never touch real hardware I/O
Hyper-V Security Model
 Uses Authorization Manager
  (AzMan)
    Fine grained authorization and access
     control
    Department and role based
    Segregate who can manage groups of
     VMs
 Define specific functions for
  individuals or roles
    Start, stop, create, add
      hardware, change drive image
 VM administrators don’t have to be
  Server 2008 administrators
 Guest resources are controlled by
  per VM configuration files
 Shared resources are protected
    Read-only (CD ISO file)
    Copy on write (differencing disks)
Virtualization Attack Vectors
 Host Hardware
 Virtual Machine Host OS
 Virtual Machine Hard Disk Files
 Virtual Machine Configuration Files
 Remote Management/Control interfaces
 Guest Operating System
 Virtual Networks
Common Attacks: Host
  Host Compromise for
    Deployment, Duplication and Deletion
    Control of Virtual Machines
    Direct Code / File injection to Virtualization File
     Structure
        Virtual Hard Disks
        Virtual Configuration Files
    Time Sync
  Hardware
    Rootkits / Malware
    Drivers (Attack Surface / Stability)
It’s all about the what’s underneath…
Use Remote Management
 All Virtualization Solutions include some form of remote
  control.
    Access to these tools should be limited.
    Limit scope of access / control


 Protect the remote control mechanisms!
    Use limited use accounts for control
    Make sure the connections are encrypted / authenticated (SSL, RDP
     over SSL)
    Use logging
                                                                        VM
                                                                     VM VM
                                                                  VM
                                                                VM VMVM VM
                                                              VM VM VMVM VM
                                                                         VM VM
                                                               VM VM
                                                                V VMVM VM
                                                                 VM VM VM
                                                                M
File Types and Locations
    .vhd disk file
        – In folder you specify
          in settings
    .vhdd disk file
        – In folder you specify
          in settings
    .vud disk file
        – In vmc-file folder


    .vsv disk file
        – In vmc-file folder
Common Attacks: Guest
 Unpatched Virtual Machines
 Older Operating Systems
 Test or Development machines (these often are not
  managed in the same way as production machines)
 Un-managed or user deployed virtual machines
 Backups and archives
Guest Attacks
  The Virtualization File Structure
     Virtual Hard Disks
         File / Code Injection
         Can be Directly Mounted / accessed
     Virtual Configuration Files
         Base Configuration changes
         Redirection / addition of Virtual drives / Resoures
  BIOS
                        <hardware>
                           <memory>
                              <ram_size type="integer">256</ram_size>
                           </memory>
                           ...
                           <pci_bus>
                              <ethernet_adapter>
                                 <controller_count type="integer">2</controller_count>
                              </ethernet_adapter>
                           </pci_bus>
                        </hardware>
VHD Redirection
Threat Landscape: Virtualized Attackers?
 Is this is one of the next big attack vectors on the horizon?


 The VM industry is focused on securing the VMs from attack.
  Very little thought of VMs being used as the attacker.

 Cases are starting to appear where people use VMs to
  attack, then shutdown the VM to remove any trace of
  evidence.
Threat Landscape: Virtualized Attackers?
 But we do write all events to the SysLog
 Things that go into drive slack are recoverable using
  forensics tools
 We still have network traces…
 …and audit logs
 …and firewall and router logs
 …not to mention video cameras in the server room.
Defending Yourself
Host Attacks: Potential Solutions
  Harden the Host Servers
     Where a Hypervisor or Specialist Kernel is used, the Host attack surface is
       smaller, however updating and patching is still required.
      Use single role servers and remove unwanted and un-necessary services /
       attack vectors
      Use a local firewall and only allow limited host control / management ports
       over encrypted and authenticated channels.
      Use limited scope admin accounts with strong passwords
  Protect the Virtual Machine files
      Access Control Lists (limited to the security context for the users who manage
       them and the services that control them.
      Encryption
           Disk / Volume / Folder / File
      Auditing
           file access, creation, deletion …
      Don’t forget the backup files / archives
Guest Attacks: Potential Solutions
  Harden the Guest Operating Systems
     Treat the guest OS as if it was a physical machine
  Isolate the machine with Virtual Networks / VLANs
     Local Only Access
     NAT
     Segmented networks
         IPSec Isolation
         Physical Isolation (Separate NICs)
Use Access Control Lists



          Deny                      Read-only                    Read/Write

• Cannot modify VMC file   • See the VM in web           • See the VM in web
• Will not appear in web     console and VRMC              console and VMRC
  console or VMRC          • Can interact with VM        • Can interact with the VM
                           • Cannot start, stop, pause   • Can
                             or resume VMs                 start, stop, pause, resume
                                                           VMs
Deployment Considerations
 Minimize risk to the Parent Partition
   Use Server Core
   Don’t run arbitrary apps, no web surfing
        Run your apps and services in guests
 Moving VMs from Virtual Server to Hyper-V
    FIRST: Uninstall the VM Additions
 Two physical network adapters at minimum
    One for management (use a VLAN too)
    One (or more) for vm networking
    Dedicated iSCSI
    Connect to back-end management network
        Only expose guests to internet traffic
Anti-Virus & BitLocker…
 Parent partition
    Run AV software and exclude .vhd
 Child partitions
    Run AV software within each VM
 BitLocker
    Great for branch office
    Can be used within a VM
        http://blogs.technet.com/virtualworld/archive/2008/02/16/using-
         bitlocker-under-virtual-pc-virtual-server.aspx
Conclusions
 Reduce the attack surface on the Host
 Use least privilege access
 Audit the deployment, maintenance, control and access to
  virtual machines
 Leverage backups, snapshots and redundancy to reduce
  impact of Host / Guest maintenance
 Secure your Virtual Machine Hard Disk and configuration
  files, including backups and archives
 Use Virtual Networks / VLANs / IPSec to Isolate
  machines, especially before they are exposed to the network.
Resources
 Step-by-Step Guide to Getting Started with Hyper-V
    http://technet2.microsoft.com/windowsserver2008/en/library/c513e254-
     adf1-400e-8fcb-c1aec8a029311033.mspx?mfr=true
 Virtualization Team Blog
    http://blogs.technet.com/virtualization

 Microsoft Virtualization Website
    http://www.microsoft.com/virtualization

 Using BitLocker under Virtual PC / Virtual Server
    http://blogs.technet.com/virtualworld/archive/2008/02/16/using-bitlocker-
     under-virtual-pc-virtual-server.aspx
We would all rather be doing
something else..
Virtualization securityv2

More Related Content

PDF
WHITE PAPER: Threats to Virtual Environments - Symantec Security Response Team
PPTX
Hypervisor Security - OpenStack Summit Hong Kong
PDF
Virtualization security and threat
PDF
VMworld 2014: ESXi Hypervisor Security
PDF
Security in a Virtualised Environment
PPTX
Security Best Practices For Hyper V And Server Virtualization
PDF
CSA Presentation 26th May Virtualization securityv2
PPTX
Virtualization security
WHITE PAPER: Threats to Virtual Environments - Symantec Security Response Team
Hypervisor Security - OpenStack Summit Hong Kong
Virtualization security and threat
VMworld 2014: ESXi Hypervisor Security
Security in a Virtualised Environment
Security Best Practices For Hyper V And Server Virtualization
CSA Presentation 26th May Virtualization securityv2
Virtualization security

What's hot (20)

PPTX
Virtualization Security
PDF
How to Optimize Microsoft Hyper-V Failover Cluster and Double Performance
PDF
Linux On V Mware ESXi
PPTX
Virtualization: Security and IT Audit Perspectives
PDF
Virtualization Technology Overview
PPTX
Virtual machine security
PPT
How to configure esx to pass an audit
PPTX
VMware vSphere 6.0 - Troubleshooting Training - Day 1
PDF
VMware vSphere 5 seminar
PDF
XS Boston 2008 OVF
PPTX
Zerto Virtual Replication 4.5
PPTX
Hypervisors
PDF
100 most vmware q&a
PDF
Hyper-V Best Practices & Tips and Tricks
PDF
Virtually Secure: Uncovering the risks of virtualization
PPTX
Xen server 6.1 customer presentation
PDF
VMware vSphere5.1 Training
PDF
XS Japan 2008 BitVisor English
PDF
Xen.org Overview 2009
PDF
Ian Prattlinuxworld Xen Aug2008
Virtualization Security
How to Optimize Microsoft Hyper-V Failover Cluster and Double Performance
Linux On V Mware ESXi
Virtualization: Security and IT Audit Perspectives
Virtualization Technology Overview
Virtual machine security
How to configure esx to pass an audit
VMware vSphere 6.0 - Troubleshooting Training - Day 1
VMware vSphere 5 seminar
XS Boston 2008 OVF
Zerto Virtual Replication 4.5
Hypervisors
100 most vmware q&a
Hyper-V Best Practices & Tips and Tricks
Virtually Secure: Uncovering the risks of virtualization
Xen server 6.1 customer presentation
VMware vSphere5.1 Training
XS Japan 2008 BitVisor English
Xen.org Overview 2009
Ian Prattlinuxworld Xen Aug2008
Ad

Similar to Virtualization securityv2 (20)

PDF
Virtualization presentation
PDF
Virtualization: Hyper-V, VMM, App-V and MED-V.
PDF
Vmware Seminar Security & Compliance for the cloud with Trend Micro
PDF
Vss Security And Compliance For The Cloud
PDF
Windows 2008 R2 Virtualization
PDF
All about virtualization spiceworks - slideshare
PPTX
virtualization and hypervisors
PPT
Usenix Invited Talk
PDF
Virtualizare si SCVMM2008
PDF
Virtualization Primer for Java Developers
PPT
6420 a 15
PPTX
Security best practices for hyper v and server virtualisation [svr307]
PPTX
Introduction to Hyper-V
PDF
Virtual Server Security for VMware: Installation Guide
PDF
Xen and Client Virtualization: the case of XenClient XT
PPTX
Virtualization
PPT
An Introduction To Server Virtualisation
PDF
663187411-UNIT-III-Virtualization-System-Specific-Attacks-1.pdf
PPTX
Virtualization-System-Specific-Attacks-1.pptx
PDF
12th Japan CloudStack User Group Meetup
Virtualization presentation
Virtualization: Hyper-V, VMM, App-V and MED-V.
Vmware Seminar Security & Compliance for the cloud with Trend Micro
Vss Security And Compliance For The Cloud
Windows 2008 R2 Virtualization
All about virtualization spiceworks - slideshare
virtualization and hypervisors
Usenix Invited Talk
Virtualizare si SCVMM2008
Virtualization Primer for Java Developers
6420 a 15
Security best practices for hyper v and server virtualisation [svr307]
Introduction to Hyper-V
Virtual Server Security for VMware: Installation Guide
Xen and Client Virtualization: the case of XenClient XT
Virtualization
An Introduction To Server Virtualisation
663187411-UNIT-III-Virtualization-System-Specific-Attacks-1.pdf
Virtualization-System-Specific-Attacks-1.pptx
12th Japan CloudStack User Group Meetup
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
Network Security Unit 5.pdf for BCA BBA.
PDF
Advanced methodologies resolving dimensionality complications for autism neur...
PDF
Reach Out and Touch Someone: Haptics and Empathic Computing
PDF
Mobile App Security Testing_ A Comprehensive Guide.pdf
PDF
Agricultural_Statistics_at_a_Glance_2022_0.pdf
PDF
NewMind AI Weekly Chronicles - August'25 Week I
PDF
Diabetes mellitus diagnosis method based random forest with bat algorithm
PDF
Encapsulation theory and applications.pdf
PPTX
Effective Security Operations Center (SOC) A Modern, Strategic, and Threat-In...
PDF
Empathic Computing: Creating Shared Understanding
PDF
Blue Purple Modern Animated Computer Science Presentation.pdf.pdf
PDF
Approach and Philosophy of On baking technology
PDF
Electronic commerce courselecture one. Pdf
DOCX
The AUB Centre for AI in Media Proposal.docx
PDF
Unlocking AI with Model Context Protocol (MCP)
PDF
TokAI - TikTok AI Agent : The First AI Application That Analyzes 10,000+ Vira...
PDF
Encapsulation_ Review paper, used for researhc scholars
PDF
Architecting across the Boundaries of two Complex Domains - Healthcare & Tech...
PDF
Peak of Data & AI Encore- AI for Metadata and Smarter Workflows
PPTX
sap open course for s4hana steps from ECC to s4
Network Security Unit 5.pdf for BCA BBA.
Advanced methodologies resolving dimensionality complications for autism neur...
Reach Out and Touch Someone: Haptics and Empathic Computing
Mobile App Security Testing_ A Comprehensive Guide.pdf
Agricultural_Statistics_at_a_Glance_2022_0.pdf
NewMind AI Weekly Chronicles - August'25 Week I
Diabetes mellitus diagnosis method based random forest with bat algorithm
Encapsulation theory and applications.pdf
Effective Security Operations Center (SOC) A Modern, Strategic, and Threat-In...
Empathic Computing: Creating Shared Understanding
Blue Purple Modern Animated Computer Science Presentation.pdf.pdf
Approach and Philosophy of On baking technology
Electronic commerce courselecture one. Pdf
The AUB Centre for AI in Media Proposal.docx
Unlocking AI with Model Context Protocol (MCP)
TokAI - TikTok AI Agent : The First AI Application That Analyzes 10,000+ Vira...
Encapsulation_ Review paper, used for researhc scholars
Architecting across the Boundaries of two Complex Domains - Healthcare & Tech...
Peak of Data & AI Encore- AI for Metadata and Smarter Workflows
sap open course for s4hana steps from ECC to s4

Virtualization securityv2

  • 1. Bryan Nairn, CISSP Senior Manager, Trustworthy Computing Microsoft Corporation bryan.nairn@microsoft.com
  • 2. Why should I care?  Server virtualization is now a given in the majority of enterprise datacenters – source IDC  The virtual server and virtual server management software market is forecast to reach a market opportunity of approximately $4.1 billion by 2014. This represents a CAGR of 13.1%. – source IDC  Over 40% of production virtual machines will be less secure than their physical counterparts through 2014 – source Gartner
  • 3. Virtualization powers the cloud Private Cloud Public Cloud • Mimics public cloud • Available to anyone • Benefits enterprise with a network users connection • Highly virtualized • Pay-as-you-go • Strings together IT • Multi-tenant and infrastructure into virtualized resources pools • Self-service portals
  • 4. Virtualization is a good thing!
  • 5. Some Common VM Security Myths  “I only have to patch my host OS / Kernel”  “If I protect my Host machine, it will protect my VMs.”  “Virtual Hard Disk files are secure by default.”  “If you expose the virtual machine, you have to expose all virtual machines and the host.”  “All virtual machines can see each other.”  “I don’t need Anti-Virus with Virtualization”
  • 7. Virtualization Architecture- Hypervisor Primary Partition Child Partitions Virtualization Stack WMI Provider Applications VM VM Worker Service Processes Ring 3 MinWin Virtualization Virtualization Service Service Providers Clients Windows (VSPs) (VSCs) Guest OS Kernel IHV Kernel Drivers VMBus VMBus Enlightenments Ring 0 Windows hypervisor Ring “-1” Server Hardware
  • 8. Hypervisor Security Assumptions  Guests are untrusted  Trust relationships  Parent must be trusted by hypervisor  Parent must be trusted by children  Hypercall interface will be well documented and widely available to attackers  All hypercalls can be attempted by guests  Can detect you are running on a hypervisor + version  The internal design of the hypervisor will be well understood
  • 9. Hypervisor Security Goals  Strong isolation between partitions  Protect confidentiality and integrity of guest data  Separation  Unique hypervisor resource pools per guest  Separate worker processes per guest  Guest-to-parent communications over unique channels  Non-interference  Guests cannot affect the contents of other guests, parent, hypervisor  Guest computations protected from other guests  Guest-to-guest communications not allowed through VM interfaces
  • 10. Hyper-V Isolation  No sharing of virtualized devices  Separate VMBus per VM to the parent  No sharing of memory  Each has its own address space  VMs cannot communicate with each other, except through traditional networking  Guests can’t perform DMA attacks because they’re never mapped to physical devices  Guests cannot write to the hypervisor  Parent partition cannot write to the hypervisor
  • 11. Hyper-V Security Hardening  Hypervisor has separate address space  Guest addresses != Hypervisor addresses  No 3rd party code in the Hypervisor  Limited number of channels from guests to hypervisor  No “IOCTL”-like things  Guest to guest communication through hypervisor is prohibited  No shared memory mapped between guests  Guests never touch real hardware I/O
  • 12. Hyper-V Security Model  Uses Authorization Manager (AzMan)  Fine grained authorization and access control  Department and role based  Segregate who can manage groups of VMs  Define specific functions for individuals or roles  Start, stop, create, add hardware, change drive image  VM administrators don’t have to be Server 2008 administrators  Guest resources are controlled by per VM configuration files  Shared resources are protected  Read-only (CD ISO file)  Copy on write (differencing disks)
  • 13. Virtualization Attack Vectors Host Hardware Virtual Machine Host OS Virtual Machine Hard Disk Files Virtual Machine Configuration Files Remote Management/Control interfaces Guest Operating System Virtual Networks
  • 14. Common Attacks: Host  Host Compromise for  Deployment, Duplication and Deletion  Control of Virtual Machines  Direct Code / File injection to Virtualization File Structure  Virtual Hard Disks  Virtual Configuration Files  Time Sync  Hardware  Rootkits / Malware  Drivers (Attack Surface / Stability)
  • 15. It’s all about the what’s underneath…
  • 16. Use Remote Management  All Virtualization Solutions include some form of remote control.  Access to these tools should be limited.  Limit scope of access / control  Protect the remote control mechanisms!  Use limited use accounts for control  Make sure the connections are encrypted / authenticated (SSL, RDP over SSL)  Use logging VM VM VM VM VM VMVM VM VM VM VMVM VM VM VM VM VM V VMVM VM VM VM VM M
  • 17. File Types and Locations .vhd disk file – In folder you specify in settings .vhdd disk file – In folder you specify in settings .vud disk file – In vmc-file folder .vsv disk file – In vmc-file folder
  • 18. Common Attacks: Guest  Unpatched Virtual Machines  Older Operating Systems  Test or Development machines (these often are not managed in the same way as production machines)  Un-managed or user deployed virtual machines  Backups and archives
  • 19. Guest Attacks  The Virtualization File Structure  Virtual Hard Disks  File / Code Injection  Can be Directly Mounted / accessed  Virtual Configuration Files  Base Configuration changes  Redirection / addition of Virtual drives / Resoures  BIOS <hardware> <memory> <ram_size type="integer">256</ram_size> </memory> ... <pci_bus> <ethernet_adapter> <controller_count type="integer">2</controller_count> </ethernet_adapter> </pci_bus> </hardware>
  • 21. Threat Landscape: Virtualized Attackers?  Is this is one of the next big attack vectors on the horizon?  The VM industry is focused on securing the VMs from attack. Very little thought of VMs being used as the attacker.  Cases are starting to appear where people use VMs to attack, then shutdown the VM to remove any trace of evidence.
  • 22. Threat Landscape: Virtualized Attackers?  But we do write all events to the SysLog  Things that go into drive slack are recoverable using forensics tools  We still have network traces…  …and audit logs  …and firewall and router logs  …not to mention video cameras in the server room.
  • 24. Host Attacks: Potential Solutions  Harden the Host Servers  Where a Hypervisor or Specialist Kernel is used, the Host attack surface is smaller, however updating and patching is still required.  Use single role servers and remove unwanted and un-necessary services / attack vectors  Use a local firewall and only allow limited host control / management ports over encrypted and authenticated channels.  Use limited scope admin accounts with strong passwords  Protect the Virtual Machine files  Access Control Lists (limited to the security context for the users who manage them and the services that control them.  Encryption  Disk / Volume / Folder / File  Auditing  file access, creation, deletion …  Don’t forget the backup files / archives
  • 25. Guest Attacks: Potential Solutions  Harden the Guest Operating Systems  Treat the guest OS as if it was a physical machine  Isolate the machine with Virtual Networks / VLANs  Local Only Access  NAT  Segmented networks  IPSec Isolation  Physical Isolation (Separate NICs)
  • 26. Use Access Control Lists Deny Read-only Read/Write • Cannot modify VMC file • See the VM in web • See the VM in web • Will not appear in web console and VRMC console and VMRC console or VMRC • Can interact with VM • Can interact with the VM • Cannot start, stop, pause • Can or resume VMs start, stop, pause, resume VMs
  • 27. Deployment Considerations  Minimize risk to the Parent Partition  Use Server Core  Don’t run arbitrary apps, no web surfing  Run your apps and services in guests  Moving VMs from Virtual Server to Hyper-V  FIRST: Uninstall the VM Additions  Two physical network adapters at minimum  One for management (use a VLAN too)  One (or more) for vm networking  Dedicated iSCSI  Connect to back-end management network  Only expose guests to internet traffic
  • 28. Anti-Virus & BitLocker…  Parent partition  Run AV software and exclude .vhd  Child partitions  Run AV software within each VM  BitLocker  Great for branch office  Can be used within a VM  http://blogs.technet.com/virtualworld/archive/2008/02/16/using- bitlocker-under-virtual-pc-virtual-server.aspx
  • 29. Conclusions  Reduce the attack surface on the Host  Use least privilege access  Audit the deployment, maintenance, control and access to virtual machines  Leverage backups, snapshots and redundancy to reduce impact of Host / Guest maintenance  Secure your Virtual Machine Hard Disk and configuration files, including backups and archives  Use Virtual Networks / VLANs / IPSec to Isolate machines, especially before they are exposed to the network.
  • 30. Resources  Step-by-Step Guide to Getting Started with Hyper-V  http://technet2.microsoft.com/windowsserver2008/en/library/c513e254- adf1-400e-8fcb-c1aec8a029311033.mspx?mfr=true  Virtualization Team Blog  http://blogs.technet.com/virtualization  Microsoft Virtualization Website  http://www.microsoft.com/virtualization  Using BitLocker under Virtual PC / Virtual Server  http://blogs.technet.com/virtualworld/archive/2008/02/16/using-bitlocker- under-virtual-pc-virtual-server.aspx
  • 31. We would all rather be doing something else..

Editor's Notes

  • #3: The growth we’ve seen in virtualization over the last 5-10 years is quite amazing. Despite the economic crisis of 2008 and the down-turn in the economy, as well as IT spending, we’re still seeing growth. POINT #1In fact, virtualization has matured enough that we’re now seeing a shift to virtual clients, as well as heavy growth in virtualization management tools. Not counting client virtualization…POINT #2The key take away from this slide is that virtualization is still growing. Moreover, we see a lot of insecurity due to the introduction of new technologies and its added complexity. POINT #3We can expect to see this number decline as virtual server and configuration management tools mature.
  • #4: Why do other people care? Virtualization powers the cloud. The speed at which cloud services, whether public or private, are adopted, depends, in large part, on the security, privacy and reliability of said services. Virtualization security plays a significant part in this equation. Although the focus of this presentation isn’t on cloud architecture, it’s important to mention that both the public and private iterations rely heavily on virtualization. The private cloud virtualizing resources for applications in the enterpriseThe public cloud providing multi-tenancy for user and/or company environments
  • #5: When securely architected, deployed and managed, virtualization is great!It provides for service flexibility, as well as scalability of applications and services, not to mention it requires less rackspace and generally consumes less power.
  • #6: In the cloud – there is a big difference between Azure (base template which is patched) or Amazon where you are responsible for your VMDon’t assume that in a cloud based scenario that your service provider has you covered by patching. It’s all different.Azure – standard image (check box – auto install base image updates)Amazon world – patch base images – do not patch deployed imagesVM needs to be treated as a stand alone machine. Firewall rules applyNo encryption built in- if someone has your
  • #7: In computer science, hierarchical protection domains,[1][2] often called protection rings, are a mechanism to protect data and functionality from faults (fault tolerance) and malicious behaviour (computer security). This approach is diametrically opposite to that of capability-based security.Computer operating systems provide different levels of access to resources. A protection ring is one of two or more hierarchical levels or layers of privilege within the architecture of a computer system. This is generally hardware-enforced by some CPUarchitectures that provide different CPU modes at the hardware or microcodelevel. Rings are arranged in a hierarchy from most privileged (most trusted, usually numbered zero) to least privileged (least trusted, usually with the highest ring number). On most operating systems, Ring 0 is the level with the most privileges and interacts most directly with the physical hardware such as the CPU and memory.Recent CPUs from Intel and AMD offer x86 virtualization instructions for a hypervisor to control Ring 0 hardware access. Although they are mutually incompatible, both Intel VT-x (codenamed &quot;Vanderpool&quot;) and AMD-V (codenamed &quot;Pacifica&quot;) create a new &quot;Ring -1&quot; so that a guest operating system can run Ring 0 operations natively without affecting other guests or the host OS.[10]
  • #9: Imagine you’re living in a house and renting out rooms. You can’t trust your guests or boarders. You can trust in the integrity of your house and your guests need to place an inherent amount of trust in you.Now imagine you have something valuable in your house. Something a thief would want. Given the value of the dollar these days, let’s say that you have hundreds of gold bars inside your house. My like a hypervisor, you can guarantee there is publicly available information about your house. Anyone can knock on your door. Anyone can inspect your windows, doors and locks to ascertain versions. All of these things are can be well understood. The point? When it comes to your hypervisor. Don’t trust anything.
  • #17: Still biggest attack vectorIf I can deploy my own virtual server, you win.Access should be limited by firewall rulesRBAC should be baked into the tool.