Organic Agriculture for IMPROVED Food Security in Africa

ORGANIC AGRICULTURE FOR IMPROVED
FOOD SECURITY IN AFRICA
RECOMMENDATIONS TO FUTURE DEVELOPMENT
Results and outcomes of a workshop about organic farming development

Mette Vaarst, Charles Ssekyewa, Niels Halberg, Mwatima Juma, Charles Walaga, Musa Muwanga,
Lise Andreasen, Aage Dissing

August 2009

Conference report

The present report is made on occasion of a workshop held at the First African Organic
Conference in Uganda, May 2009

Report title
ORGANIC AGRICULTURE FOR IMPROVED FOOD SECURITY IN AFRICA
RECOMMENDATIONS TO FUTURE DEVELOPMENT
Results and outcomes of a workshop about organic farming development

Participating organisations

Danish Development Research Network, DDRN
Uganda Martyrs University
International Centre for Research in Organic Food Systems, ICROFS
National Organic Agricultural Movement of Uganda, NOGAMU
Organic Denmark, OD
University of Aarhus, AU, Denmark

ISBN: 87‐91949‐43‐2

August 2009

[Front page photos from conference and provided by the authors]

ORGANIC AGRICULTURE FOR I MPROVED FOOD S ECURITY IN AFRICA

1

Preface and acknowledgements

This report is the result of a one-day workshop held on 22 May 2009 as a part of The First African
Organic Conference, 19-22 May 2009 in Kampala.

The workshop was initiated by Aarhus University, ICROFS, and Organic Denmark in collaboration
with NOGAMU and Uganda Martyrs University. The background for this day was a shared interest
among the organisers of the workshop to bring the results and findings in the UNCTAD-UNEP
CBTF report ‘Organic Agriculture and Food Security in Africa’ into discussion at this African
Organic Conference where other proofs were tables to support beyond question that organic
farming can contribute to improved food security for present and future generations through the
conscious use of agro-ecological farming practices.

The study presented in this report was initiated in 2004 and the report was published in 2008. It
describes and analyses the relationship between organic farming and food security in Africa, and it
presents evidence supporting the argument that organic agriculture can be more conducive to food
security in Africa than most conventional production systems, and that it is more likely to be
sustainable in the long term.

The aim of this particular workshop was to discuss how the findings can be used in practice, both in
terms of guiding future development as well as being implemented to the benefit of all involved,
and in particular Africans in current and future generations.

Danish Development Research Network (DDRN) funded the day, for which we are very grateful.
The development objective of DDRN is to contribute to the inclusion of research and research-
based knowledge in development assistance and in partner countries’ development activities.

To reach this goal, DDRN works with three immediate objectives:
• Dissemination and exchange of information between development programmes and the
research community within agriculture, environment and governance. DDRN provides,
filters and amplifies information and research-based knowledge;

• Fostering an engaged and committed network of members by providing the necessary
information channels, mechanisms and tools. DDRN facilitates community building,
interaction and collaboration among its members;

• Promotion of production and exchange of research-based knowledge relevant to
development assistance within agriculture, environment and governance. DDRN facilitates
thematic platforms, North-South partnerships and establishment of links at national, regional
and international levels.

The staff members of NOGAMU and Martyrs University, who took care of the communication with
the venue and all the practicalities, are acknowledged for their efforts.

Conference participants (100-150) joined the workshop and were active and constructive during the
day. Bo van Elzakker and Gunnar Rundgren excellently facilitated the group discussions in two of
the groups, for which we are very grateful. As the present report indicates, good recommendations
and practical comments and advice were given, which makes the organising team behind this
workshop conclude that the day was successfully fulfilling its objectives.


2

Contents

Executive summary .....................................................................................................................4

1. Introduction to the UNCTAD-UNEP CBTF report ’Organic Agriculture and
Food Security in Africa’ .........................................................................................................6

2. Summaries of presentations
2.1 Is organic farming an unjustified luxury in a world with too many hungry people?
Summary of presentation given by Dr.Niels Halberg ...........................................................8
2.2 Exploiting the potential of organic agriculture: Adoption of Agro-ecological
methods and needs for future adaptation and development. Summary of
presentation given by Dr. Mwatima Juma ..........................................................................11
2.3 Exploiting the potential of OA: The balance between export oriented and diversified
farming for food security. Summary of presentation given by Dr. Charles Walaga...........13

3. Outcomes of group work
3.1 How to address the need for development of agro-ecological methods for improved
Food security, stability and access for smallholder farmers. Facilitator Mwatima Juma ...16
3.2 How to address and organize capacity building in organic agriculture and processing
At different levels? Facilitator Gunnar Rundgren ...............................................................17
3.3 How to strengthen community level development through organic agriculture?
Facilitator Charles Walaga ..................................................................................................18
3.4 How to support chain development and market access? Facilitator Bo van Elzakker .......20

4. Recommendations for future focus and action .....................................................................21

Appendices

1. Slide hand-outs, Dr. Niels Halberg .......................................................................................24
2. Slide hand-outs, Dr. Mwatima Juma .....................................................................................27
3. Slide hand-outs, Dr. Charles Walaga ....................................................................................30
4. Slides developed by group 4 (Chain and market access) ......................................................33


3

Executive summary
Organic farming offers a way to increase productivity, and improve food security and livelihood for
African smallholder farmers, given that agro-ecological methods are properly and appropriately
implemented, and that trade, consumption patterns and policies enable a fair development of food
systems. This was concluded in an UNEP-UNCTAD CBTF report from 2008 exploring the
potentials of organic farming in Africa.

In this report, it was furthermore concluded that organic and near-organic agricultural methods and
technologies are ideally suited for many poor, marginalized smallholder farmers in Africa, that
organic farming builds on and stimulates the formation of human, social, financial, natural and
physical capital, and that the recent rise in food and fuel prices highlight the importance of making
agricultural production less energy and external input dependent. Since organic farming is not
directly and specifically supported by agricultural policy in most African countries, and sometimes
actively hindered, an effort to establish and support an enabling policy environment must be done.
At a one-day workshop on the 22nd May 2009 in Kampala in relation to the First African organic
conference, the findings of this report were discussed and the experience among the approx. 150
participants from throughout Africa strongly supported the conclusions. The following points were
highlighted:

- Organic farming should be used as a strategy for community development and a sustainable
food system for improved family food security.
- Organic farming and management is very knowledge intensive, and education as well as
access to knowledge is crucial. Many small-scale farmers are illiterate. Capacity building as
a social process which support the local communities and create valuable networks.
- Gender issues must be addressed, for many reasons, in order to support future development
of organic farming. At the same time, it was highlighted that men should be targeted as
heads of families to support the development of the whole family.
- We need to go beyond farming systems and talk about localisation of food systems,
including the strengthening of the local and social capital. Strengthening of whole
communities should be supported.
- Organic farming helps the farmers and citizens of a country against land degradation and to
ensure that the land is fertile for the next generations.
- There are huge numbers of experiences from all over Africa, which should be used, and the
differences between different ecological zones / biomers should clearly be considered.
- Policy reforms are needed. A major reason why organic farming is not more widespread is
because of policies, e.g. heavy subsidies on fertilizer and chemicals, lack of education, and
the fact that agro-ecological methods are more labour intensive. The development of organic
farming cannot be left to the private sector. Furthermore, there are links between agriculture,
environment and food production with regard to politics, which should be further explored
and linked together.
- Certification systems and internal procedures for control, inspection and development
should be further developed. Farmers should be owners of their own certification, and
certification at a farm or in a community should not be restricted to one crop, but the whole
farm. Certification should be given when certain whole-farm agro-ecological methods are in
use.


4

- Diversified production on farm-level increases the food-security for the family and leave the
farmer less vulnerable for market prices at a certain product.
- The AGRA initiative was mentioned several times and is a major threat for Africa. It has
severe consequences for Africa and creates dependency. The use of GMO and chemicals is
heavily subsidised, and the promotors use the same rhetoric talking about sustainability.
- Value adding in Africa is needed. This includes all levels from on-farm processing and joint
access to local markets as well as a more fair development of the conditions for international
trade, e.g. tariff barriers.


5

1. Introduction to the UNEPUNCTAD CBTF report ‘Organic
Agriculture and Food Security in Africa’

This report was prepared in a joint effort between UNEP and UNCTAD
and a group of authors during the period 2004-20081. It was based on a
number of studies, experiences and research results primarily in the three
East African countries Uganda, Kenya and Tanzania. Literature review was
based on research from tropical organic agriculture throughout the world.

The main findings of the analysis in the CBTF task force were that
- Organic farming can increase agricultural production and raise
incomes with low-cost, locally available and appropriate
technologies and without causing environmental damage.
- All case studies report increased yields per hectares of food crops,
see below.

Region Number of Number of Number of Number of Average change
countries projects farmers in hectares* in crop yields**
represented analysed projects million ha per cent
(millon)
Africa*** 24 114 1,900,000 2.0 +116

East Africa 7 71 1,600,000 1.4 +128

Tanzania 1 9 27,000 0.06 +67

Uganda 1 17 241,000 0.68 +54
* Organic and near-organic agriculture, million ha
** compared with beginning of projects, per cent
*** all countries with data

- Evidence indicates that productivity in organic agriculture can grow over time.
- Organic and near-organic agricultural methods and technologies are ideally suited for many
poor, marginalized smallholder farmers in Africa.
- Organic farming builds on and stimulates the formation of human, social, financial, natural
and physical capital,
- The recent rise in food and fuel prices highlight the importance of making agricultural
production less energy and external input dependent.
- Certified organic production can undoubtedly reduce poverty among farmers and in this way
contribute to improved food security, if not used in mono-cropping systems which make
farmers vulnerable to export price fluctuations and crop failures.
- Organic farming is making a significant contribution to the reduction of food insecurity and
to improve peoples’ livelihoods, and there is potential to do more in this area with enabling
policy and institutional support.
- Organic farming is not directly and specifically supported by agricultural policy in most
African countries, and sometimes actively hindered. If organic agriculture and its associated
positive side-effects are to be scaled up, an enabling policy environment is critical.
1
www.unctad.org/en/docs/ditcted200715_en.pdf


6

- Integrated organic agriculture – certified or non-certified – is ore management- and
knowledge intensive, which makes it necessary to build learning and cooperative capacity of
both individuals and groups.
- More information on agro-ecological technologies is needed. This calls for a shift of
emphasis in research and science budgets, and for better linkages between research,
development, training and farmers.
- Organic agriculture is successfully fostered by partnerships between farmers, civil society
organisations, organic movements, governments and certifying bodies at all levels.
- The conclusions of this report are confirmed by the findings and recommendations of the
recently released IAASTD report, which is made in an intergovernmental process and
supported by over 400 experts under the co-sponsorship of FAO, GEF, UNDP, UNEP,
UNESCO, The World Bank and WHO (14th April 2008).


7

2. Summaries of presentations
2.1 Is organic farming an unjustified luxury in a world with too many
hungry people?

Summary of the presentation by Niels Halberg2

There is a reason for addressing the link between food
security and organic farming. The world needs food, and if
organic farming cannot feed the world, also in case of a 100
percent conversion, then it is not interesting to discuss the
development of organic farming as a solution to the world
food situation. A conversion of e.g. 20 percent of the land in
West-Europe may improve soil fertility etc. on a
local/regional level, but will not contribute significantly to
the food production where there is need for healthy food.
With the background in a recent book3 where conversion to
organic farming was modelled, and with the reference to a
number of other publications4, much evidence seems to
strongly support the findings of the UNEP-UNCTAD report.

When discussing food production in relation to hunger alleviation one needs to acknowledge the
four dimensional concept of food security. A so-called food-crisis is claimed to exist - and has
existed and been debated during many years, which indicates that it is not a new phenomenon. In
some regions, the productivity of food is low and this clearly contributes to the lack of food, but in
very many parts of the world including countries where people are hungry, sufficient food is
2
Halberg’s presentation is available as full-text article: Halberg, N., Peramaiyan, P. and Walaga, C. (2009).”Is Organic
Farming an Unjustified Luxury in a World with too many hungry People?,” In Willer & Kilcher (eds.). The World of
Organic Agriculture. Statistics & Emerging Trends 2009, pp. 95-100. FiBL and IFOAM. More information in Organic
Eprints: http://orgprints.org/15572.
3
Halberg et al. (2006). “The impact of organic farming on food security in a regional and global perspective” In
Halberg, N., Alrøe, H. F., Knudsen, M. T. and Kristensen, E. S. (eds.). Global Development of Organic Agriculture:
Challenges and Prospects, chapter 10, pp. 277-322. CABI Publishing. More information in Organic Eprints:
http://orgprints.org/9209.
4
More information at Halberg’s professional webpage: www.icrofs.org/Pages/About_ICROFS/niels_halberg.html


8

produced to allow all to be satisfied if the access was improved. As an example, India is net
exporter of food, despite that fact that there are about 200 million hungry people in the country.
Arguments such as ‘chemical / industrialised farming can improve food security’ are unjustified
when in-equal food distribution rather than low production is the core of the problem. An organic
solution offers not only improved productivity in low input agricultural systems but also emphasises
the fairness perspectives as well as the health and the ecological sustainability.

The evidence presented in the UNEP-UNCTAD report builds on existing data from a number of
different projects where conscious use of organic methods were implemented. This report deals
with 114 studies in 24 African countries covering close to 2 million farmers and 2 million hectares.
The authors looked at the reported improvements in terms of yields and other benefits on farm,
community and society levels. More than a doubling in yields (an average of 116 percent) were
achieved from conversion to organic farming, and the studies specifically in seven East African
countries showed an increase of 128 percent in yields (cf. the table in the Introduction, page 6). This
supports the claim that organic farming can improve food production and access in Africa.

A number of mechanisms were discussed as potential explanations for this success of organic
farming, and they were related to natural, human, and social capital.

With regard to the natural capital, the intensified use of kitchen gardens or homestead gardens was
emphasised as building up and improving food security and natural capital. This intensification
involved use of compost, manure, generally improved management and local system improvement.
They often introduced new elements in the farms, like fish, trees etc. In addition to this, they


9

improved soil and water conservation techniques, used multipurpose trees, and used mulching and
improved the stable food crop yields by these and other techniques.

The authors also emphasised the social capital elements, like participatory processes, learning and
building up of community based networks e.g. including micro finance access, which were involved
in most of the reviewed studies.

There are also a number of challenges connected to conversion to organic farming:
- Organic farming and management is very knowledge intensive. The access to information
and possibilities to spend time learning and the need for advisors who can guide farmers to
development are crucial issues for the future implementation of organic and agro-ecological
methods.
- Market access is important, both to local, national and international markets. Often, there is
no premium prices involved, but the contribution to food security on a local level includes
the possibility for income generation as the possibility to purchase food when a household is
not self-sustained.
- Gender issues are important to address for the future development of organic farming. There
is a justified general concern because of the un-equal distribution of work, responsibilities,
decision power and access to money.

Niels Halberg finished his presentation with a number of s questions which are relevant to ask and
to discuss in relation to this report: In particular, “when organic farming seems to be able to
contribute so successfully to food security, why is it then not spread more widely and easily?”

The full presentation is given in appendix 1.

More information

ICROFS produces various fact sheets5 to sum up recent results from research in organic food
systems. ICROFS fact sheet no. 2 is entitled (click the link below to get the pdf-file):

How Organic Agriculture May Feed the World 6 [ICROFS fact sheet no. 2]

5
More information on the fact sheets is available at: www.icrofs.org/Pages/Publications/factsheets.html.
6
www.icrofs.org/pdf/2009_fact_sheet_food security.pdf


10

2.2 Exploiting the potential of organic agriculture: Adoption of agro
ecological methods and needs for future adaptation and development

Summary of the presentation by Mwatima Juma

Mwatima Juma introduced the topic by defining agro-ecological
farming as farming following the organic principles, being
certified or not-certified. Agro-ecological farming is much more
than just avoiding chemical inputs: it is building up ecologically
sustainable systems. Furthermore, she emphasised the following
characteristics for agro-ecological farming:
- It will often build on indigenous knowledge, which can
be combined with e.g. scientific research based
knowledge and agricultural experience based knowledge.
- We need to focus on the sustainability element in the
production. It is not only a question of e.g. producing
enough food for consumption, but it is important to look
at whether the certain field can continue to produce food
or we exhaust it by growing the same crop year after year
without improving the fertility.
- The families will benefit as a whole, and the emphasis should be on self-reliance and
capacity-building.
- We do need to go beyond the farming system and talk about a localisation of food systems,
including a strengthening of the local capital.

There is a major challenge in accessing knowledge for the farmers. They need to know about the
basic agro-ecological methods, such as
- crop rotation (e.g. legume based crop rotation improves soil fertility)
- intercropping,
- biological pest control (neem, garlic, ashes, pheromone traps etc),
- water management and conservation (bund and trench systems, agro-forestry, mulching),
- erosion control (e.g. strip contouring and slope stabilisation) and nutrient recycling.

Many techniques help fulfilling more tasks, such as the use of compost both is nutrient recycling
and water conservation by increased moist kept in the soil.

Agro-ecological systems help farmers to address land degradation and in that way ensure a better
future for the next generations. Especially in these years, where the consequences of climate
changes are so increasingly visible, the resilience and ways of managing uncertainties are of much
importance.

Mwatima Juma furthermore addressed the issue of why the agro-ecological techniques were not
used in a wider way and mentioned the policy framework as the main issue, such as the heavily
subsidies chemicals, the lack of education, the more labour intense agro-ecological farming as
important factors for this.


11

There is a huge need for technical assistance and capacity-building. There is need for very much
more research, e.g. for verification of indigenous knowledge, climate changes and bio-inputs. There
is lack of knowledge on all levels from farmers to political levels. Mwatima Juma mentioned this as
a major challenge for the up-scaling of organic methods. All these issues should be addressed in the
future.

The only way forward is empowerment and work with farmers to craft new knowledge bases and
take the organic principles serious and incorporates traditional knowledge together with new
knowledge. Farmer Field Schools can be used for this. Women should be particularly targeted, and
there should be much focus on natural resource bases.


12

2.3 Exploiting the potential of OA: The balance between export oriented
and diversified farming for food security

Summary of the presentation by Charles Walaga

The conclusions from the UNCTAD-UNEP report of particular
importance for the balance between export-oriented and diversified
farming for food security are:

- Organic farming increases quantity of food produced per
farm. This leads to household food security
- Export production increases household incomes and
therefore consolidates food security,
- Organic farming benefits the natural environment, and
therefore improves future farming possibilities.

It is a fact that smallholder farmers in Africa directly depend on their own production, and this
means that in order to meet all needs, they have a diversified production, including medical plants
etc. This helps the farmer to mitigate risk of failure of a certain enterprise. The farmers can choose
to sell excess food or to produce cash crops to sell. If the family succeeds in having market access
they can buy food when their own crop fails.

The certification on a farm is basically organised in two different ways:
- The farmers and their partner NGOs organise and own the certification of the farms. They
were diversified before the certification and maintain the diversity.
- A trading company organise certification of a group of farmers with a certain cash crop. The
consequences can be limited integration of the cash crop plot with the other farm
enterprises, and the cash crop plot may occupy more and more space on the expense of the
household food production. This can have the consequence that over-emphasis on the export
production undermines the food security of the family. It creates a dependency which can be
unfortunate, if markets are unstable and the farmers do not participate in setting the price. It
may also lead to mono-cropping or at least reduced diversity, which makes the farmer more
vulnerable to failure, and makes the crop more susceptible to pests.


13

Which strategies can be implemented in order to balance the export oriented production with the
diversified farming for household food security?
- Emphasis on crop rotation and intercrops before certification is granted
- Consider the proportion of land reserved for export production before certification,
- Limit the quantity of harvest that can be sold per farm,
- Make sure that marketing systems guarantee a minimum income for farmers
- Gender equity requirements should be incorporated in organic standards, and it should be
possible to evaluate this, and tools should be developed for certification of this.


14

Farmers should be owners of their own certification, and certification should not only be restricted
to one product, but the whole farm. An organic farmer should be able to sell one crop to one
company and other crops to other companies, and this might improve and stimulate diversity on the
farms. Stronger organic value chains should be developed, where the farmers are stronger players,
and this will also improve the very important diversity, which is not only good for the household
food security and income as the same time as it is an important part of the organic concept.

All these strategies are expensive to implement and will require cooperation of all stakeholders.

An example shown
by Dr. Walaga of a
well established
balance between
diversified family
food production and
cash crops.


15

3 Outcomes of group work
3.1 How to address the need for development of agroecological methods
for improve food security, stability and access for smallholder farmers

Facilitated by Mwatima Juma and reported by Munshimbwe Chitalu.

The discussion in this group reflected the need for exchange of experience and view points from
different countries in Africa and elsewhere. Certain things were very critical in some regions, e.g.:
- The level of land degradation and how this had developed up till now
- The use of chemical inputs
- Increased use of mono-cultural farming and technology.
- The AGRA Alliance for a New Green Revolution in Africa) initiative was a major threat in
some parts of Africa. It has severe consequences for farmers and creates dependency on
chemical inputs, they include GMO, and these inputs are heavily subsidised, and it does not
lead to increased productivity but rather to land degradation. Nevertheless, the supporters
behind this initiative use the same rhetoric and also talk of sustainability, like the organic
movement does.

The group came up with the following statements and recommendations to future organic
development for food security of the families:
- Go back to the roots and intentions of real organic farming, and take the principles serious
- Do not focus on the use of old traditional methods – they were used and appropriate when
the population pressure was lower.
- All planning must be based on a zoning of areas and exploring the potentials of each type of
area separately.
- Even though it was widely acknowledged that ecological stability would be difficult in some
areas, the group members came up with many examples of how it could work, such as ways
in which very dry areas could become more fertile through the use e.g. of soil improving
methods.
- Policy reforms are needed, where sustainable practices become obligatory and supported by
legal policies. E.g. a law in Uganda emphasise terracing. Tanzania has mainstreamed
organic practices and Kenya has harmonised the organic farming.
- Integration of different policies would make a more efficient way for organic legislation.


16

- Emphasise the link between agriculture, food production and environment with regard to
policy development. This is often ignored by policy makers, and decisions as well as
legislation are made very disconnected in relation to the other areas.
- Focus on education and awareness raising.
- Tell the story. It will so clearly help understanding concretely that organic farming really
works in practice.
- The incentives for organic development were discussed. There are some incentives which
are not managed well and not really encouraging anyway, like e.g. carbon credits at the
private market, which does not really work for a sustainable future.
- Organic agriculture should be supported by policies, and not left to the private sector.

3.2 How to address and organize capacity building in organic agriculture
and processing at different levels?

Facilitator Gunnar Rundgren and reported by Getaneh B. Beshah

Capacity building is particularly seen as a social process, e.g. in groups of farmers and local
communities, organised formally or informally. Various networks for capacity building can very
well exist as parallel structures in same communities, and work fine. There is a need to overcome
training bias with regard to gender, and there are many promising examples of farmer field schools
and some examples of researchers being involved in training development and establishing
knowledge and data banks, and being included in FFS (e.g. in Benin). This is a promising approach
in order to build up and articulate new knowledge. This can be difficult to get funded, as it is not
high prestige research.

Apart from the capacity building in local communities, other target group are trainers as well as
school and university staff, where organic farming needs to be built into curriculums in agricultural
schooling. There might be a need for specialised organic agricultural training centres. In Nigeria
there are examples of integrating organic approaches into existing research and training institutions.


17

This also involves research, and several research needs could be identified, but above all there is a
need to take more holistic approaches and work in multi-disciplinary teams. This demands a change
of attitude.

A third level where capacity building is needed is with regard to market operators and e.g. in
relation to new certification systems and internal procedures.

The whole organic sector, including the organic movements and NGO’s need to build up capacity in
terms of up-dated knowledge and training in media handling in order to be better ambassadors and
trainers. The media and policy makers should be introduced to the topic and there is a huge need to
clarify misconceptions regarding OA. They need to see the results of organic approaches and they
need to know the biases against organic approaches in current policies (e.g. fertiliser subsidies).

3.3 How to strengthen community level development through organic
agriculture?

Facilitator Charles Walaga and reported by Gloria Musowa

Community development comes with improved social capital, through collaboration and group
work. The abilities to take leadership and ownership over the processes are crucial and should be a
focus for training, and should involve the whole community. Education should target all age groups
and whole families.

The question is how organic farming can contribute to community development. It was agreed that
if organic approaches should strengthen the local community, then everybody needed to be
involved. Strengthening of communities could not happen if the community is divided in two parts,
of which one is organic. Examples were given from joint efforts on water conservation, soil
conservations, health focus in the families, and taking care of natural resources and the
environment, and also in cases where bargaining power and lobbying capacity is required.
Examples were given from different regions in Africa, e.g. in Zambia.

We need to look beyond the organic farming, to see what benefit we find on an overall level for the
communities, in terms of e.g. better environment, water, health and biodiversity, where one
example from Kabale about community efforts for soil conservation was practiced. Fair trading
systems should be in integrated part of organic farming development in local communities.


18

Organic agriculture should be used as a strategy for:
building the social capital for farmers in communities
o Organisational development
o Knowledge & skill sharing
o Conflict resolution
o Gender empowerment
o Marketing capacity
o Lobbying / advocacy
Improving health of community
Water conservation at community level
Soil conservation
Biodiversity conservation
Increased financial benefit
Improved market access

The text on the first poster produced by this group.

The group shortly discussed some challenges and constraints for strengthening communities
through the implementation and local development of organic agriculture. Factors were discussed,
such as uncertain land ownership leading to indifference to the environment, e.g. planting of trees,
as well as the difficulties of collaboration between NGOs with each their own and in many cases
quite restricted agenda.

Constraints
- Inadequate technical & financial resources to upscale O.A.
- High illiteracy levels among small scale farmers
- Dominance of exporters in the value chain
- Lack of synergies among key players
- Lack of supportive organic research
- Lack of knowledge of rights and obligations

The text of the second poster of the group, where constraints to the
community level work for implementation of organic agriculture were listed.


19

3.4 How to support chain development and market access?

Facilitator Bo van Elzakker, notes by Rose Mary Mamirembe7 and reported by Irene Kogonza

The organic sector should focus on the whole certification system and ensure that it can be owned
by the farmers. This will strengthen the ownership and the courage for real development. Farmers
take risks anyway, so they should also own the area. The certification should focus on the whole
farm, and not just a limited part of the farm, e.g. the crops which are sold organically. All in all, the
certification systems should be more simple, more farmer friendly and with a mutual recognition of
certifiers.

Men should be targeted, because they are heads of families, and they need to be trained to support
the whole families. There is a huge need to make sure that the whole families benefit, so that
everybody works together: ‘Let us support the men to support the women’. Gender equality should
be included in the certification process, the training, the value adding, and the marketing. The
farmers need on-farm training in terms of technical advice, management of the land, how to
organize etc., and this can very well happen in groups.

Value adding is needed, and this demands knowledge, capacity building, training and development
of strategies. Farmers should know about quality and how to process things, and they should be
helped in organising themselves to access the market and do a joint effort. We have to focus on
market needs/requirements if we are to do good marketing – and markets require good quality. In
this part, there is a need for focus and maybe for specialization of farmers. Even though they may
need a diversified production for their own food security, they may need training to the level of
specialization regarding cash crops.

7
Slides from this presentation can be found in appendix 4.


20

Media plays a big role and should be targeted, both in order to stimulate farmers to access the
market, and in order to target consumers to tell them about the products.

Input providers should be involved in the chain, e.g. seed and breeding companies, agricultural tools
and equipment, planning material etc.

Finally, the group identified a need for national platforms which comprise all the key players of the
sector and the market.

4 Recommendations for future focus and action
The following were statements and recommendations given by the speakers, emerging from the
group discussions and the final plenary session at the DDRN sponsored workshop held at the 22nd
May 2009 at the First African Organic Conference at Sheraton Hotel, Kampala. The
recommendations and statements do not necessarily express consensus between all participants.

Organic farming is very knowledge intensive. Capacity building is needed at all levels:
- Focus on the young people. Educate them and encourage them to take responsibility and
lead changes on the farms, and demonstrate to them how organic farming can both be
sustainable and productive.
- Use of Farmer Field School-type of trainings. This gives a chance for farmers to integrate
their own indigenous knowledge into the agro-ecological farming practices and develop
context specific solutions to challenges.
- Linkages to conventional farmer groups can relevantly be made and capacity building
should be offered in terms of agricultural knowledge and knowledge about markets as well
as possibilities to access markets via organisations.
- Trainers and extension agents should be targeted for education also.
- The organic sector and organisations need to continuously update knowledge and capacity.
- Farmers need knowledge in all agro-ecological methods, e.g. crop rotation, intercropping,
biological pest control, water and soil conservation, and prevention of soil erosion.
- Tell all the good stories – both for farmers, consumers, Africans and others.

Organic farming is based on the use of agro-ecological methods, where research based knowledge
is combined with indigenous knowledge.
- Research should be integrated with stakeholder networks in order to focus on projects which
are relevant for the organic farming communities.
- We need holistic research approaches focusing on whole food chains, diversified farming
systems, as well as community development.
- Network of research institution- building of research data base
- Better publication and dissemination of useful tested technology in user friendly language
- All planning and development must be contextual specific, and based on zonal analyses and
approaches.

Building of social capital on community level for improved local food security and food
sovereignty
- Capacity building is a social process, where all in a local community benefit from the
common development and the collaboration. Whole communities need to be involved in
organic farming if the full benefit on community level should be obtained.
- Whole families should be involved in community development.


21

- Community collaboration and social capital should also be based on goals like better
environment, water, health, biodiversity and natural resource management.

The policy framework is a major reason for agro-ecological methods being wider used, e.g. the
heavily subsidised chemical input and strong lobbying for GMO which will create dependency on
income and industries most of which exist in USA or Europe and which have considerable financial
power.
- There is a major need for continuous lobbying and awareness creation among policy makers,
through organisations, consumers, farmers and institutions.
- Media should be involved.
- Governments should be targeted to give explicit support to ecological agriculture in national
policies.
- An effort should be made to create awareness of the AGRA initiative, where rhetoric like
‘sustainability’ is used, but which creates dependency on (currently heavily subsidised)
chemical inputs, increases land degradation and focuses mainly on large scale production in
some cases via contract farming.
- There should be a mixture of private sector and policy support, with main focus on the latter.
- Policy reforms are needed where sustainable practices become obligatory and supported by
legal policies.

Consumer awareness needs to be raised:
- Collaboration with media to include it in their debates and information dissemination.
- Demonstrations of organic farms to consumers so that they become aware of the healthy
aspects of the production.

Institutional development
- Enhance networking and collaboration among stakeholders

Interact with policies and actors involved in natural resource management and environmental
sectors
- There are many links and common interests between agriculture, health, food production
and environmental care. These links should be elaborated.
-
Improve gender equity and equality
- Gender issues must be addressed in all ways, since this is a major key to improved
household food security. This is discussed in-depth in a newly launched report from IFOAM
by Farnworth and Hutchings8.
- Target whole families and especially men in order to encourage them to support the women.

Diversified farms with a well balanced production of family food and cash crops will ensure food
security for the population much better than e.g. market dependent production of few crops.
Therefore, diversified production should be encouraged.

Certification should focus on organic farming principles and comprise whole farms, and
certification should be owned by the farmers / farmer groups. This can be done by e.g.
- Emphasis on crop rotation and intercrops before certification is granted

8
Farnworth, C. & J. Hutchings, 2009. Organic agriculture and womens’ empowerment. IFOAM, Germany, pp 96
[www.ifoam.org/growing_organic/1_arguments_for_oa/social_justice/pdfs/Gender-Study-090421.pdf].


22

- The proportion of land reserved for export production should be considered before
certification,
- The quantity of harvest that can be sold per farm should be limited,
- Make sure that marketing systems guarantee a minimum income for farmers
- Gender equity requirements should be incorporated in organic standards, and tools should be
developed to certifying this.

Market development
- Local, regional and national markets should all be in focus
- Improve possibilities for value adding in Africa. Most African countries do not have
industries which can absorb labourers if smallholder farmers leave their farms. If the
industry and value adding should happen in African countries, and e.g. industry for export
should be developed then much change is needed, also in the markets and tariff systems.
This needs an international effort.


23

Appendix 1
Slide hand-outs, Dr. Niels Halberg

Modelling food security with IFPRI’s
Is Organic Farming an Unjustified Luxury
IMPACT model
in a Niels Halberg, Icrofs;
Mark Rosegrant, Timothy Sulser
World With Too Many Hungry People? • Modelling food projections to 2020 International Food Policy
relative to baseline scenario Research Institute

Conclusions in brief:
Niels Halberg, Lise Andreasen
International Centre for Research in Organic 1. Possible to convert 50% of Europe
Food Systems and North America to OA without
signifcant effects on food security in
Mette Vaarst Sub-Saharan Africa
University of Aarhus
2. Converting 50% of Sub-Saharan
Africa to OA can reduce needs for
food import and improve local food
access

Global trends in agriculture I:
World yields of cereals and roots and
tubers from 1961-2003 (hkg/ha) Global trends in
agriculture II:
World fertilizer
400
Industrialised countries Industrialised countries
55
350
Roots and tubers yield [hkg/ha]

use 1961 to 1999
China China

45 Developing countries Developing countries
300
g/ha]

(kg ha 1
(k h -1)
Afrika, developing Africa, developing
ds
Cereal yields [hkg

250
35

200
25
150

15
100
Very small increase in
5 50 Fertiliser use in SSA
61
64
67

85
88
91
94
97
00
03
70
73
76
79
82
61
64
67
70
73
76
79
82
85
88
91
94
97
00
03

19
20
20
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
20
20

Yields have not grown significantly in Africa south of Sahara for 45 years (FAO, 2003).

(FAOSTAT, 2004)

Worldwide undernourishment is not explained
only by a lack of food availability Food security dimensions
• Food Availability: sufficient quantities of food of
• Seventy-five percent of the world’s 1.2 billion poor live in rural
areas of developing countries. appropriate quality
• They suffer from problems associated with subsistence • Food Access: Access, by individuals, to adequate
production in isolated and marginal locations with low levels resources and entitlements for acquiring
of technology. appropriate foods for a nutritious diet
• Food Stability: access to adequate food at all times,
”There is need to seek new solutions to
address the problems posed by growing
resilience to economic and climatic shocks
populations (and disparities) and • Food Utilisation: ways in which food contributes to an
environmental degradation adequate diet, clean water, sanitation and
through new paradigms for agriculture and healthcare, and in turn, to a state of nutritional
food supply chains”
wellbeing where all physiological needs are met

International Conference on Organic Agriculture and
Food Security, FAO, Rome, May, 2007 Used by World Food Summit and FAO

24

UNCTAD : Organic agriculture could Organic Agriculture is a ”good
option for food security in Africa”
boost African food security
• African agricultural productivity could be restored through organic
agriculture "… organic agriculture can be
• The organic solution - which uses local resources, improves soil fertility more conducive to food
and is environmentally friendly - is "equal or better than most
conventional systems and more likely to be sustainable in the longer
security than most conventional
term" systems, and .. it is more likely to
• But the continent will have to overcome formidable challenges if it is to be sustainable in the
seize these opportunities, UNCTAD warns, including limited productive long term."
capacity, market access, government support, and certification. (Mr. Supachai Panitchpakdi, The
Secretary-General of UNCTAD
Mr. Achim Steiner, executive director of
10 Feb 09 UNEP
2008).

Yields of organic and Rachel Hine and Jules Pretty
Succes with agro-organic methods:
Agro-ecological agriculture in Africa University of Essex Review of 208 projects in 52 countries
NATURAL CAPITAL • Intensifying the “kitchengarden”
Region Number of Number of Number of Number of Average
• Introduction of new element in
countries projects farmers in hectares* change in
represented analysed projects million ha crop yields**
the farm system,
(millon) per cent – Fish farming,
Africa*** 24 114 1,900,000 2.0 +116 – “multipurpose trees”

East Africa 7 71 1,600,000
, , 1.4 +128
•Better exploitation of natural
Tanzania 1 9 27,000 0.06 +67 resources, soil, water and organic
matter,
Uganda 1 17 241,000 0.68 +54 •Mulching and soil cover,
•Feed crops along field edges
•Water accumulation,
•Increased yields in basic crops:
* Organic and near-organic agriculture, million ha
** compared with beginning of projects, per cent
•Leguminous plants,
*** all countries with data •Prevention of harmful organisms
•Better genetic material
After Pretty et al., 2005
Jules Pretty et al., 2001

Key improvements shown by case studies
Types of improvement through No. of case studies which
Improvements to: Mechanism: showed improvement %
agroecological projects II
Amount of - Increase in food produced 12 80
• Social capital: Participatory processes leading to available food - Increase in yields of food (of 15 in
empowerment and group action crops/livestock total)
Natural capital •- Benefits to natural 14 93
• Human capital: Training and continuous learning
environment
programmes • (soils, water, fertility, etc.)
• Ph i l capital: A
Physical it l Access t markets and
to k t d Social capital •- Builds partnerships between 14 93
infrastructure groups
• Financial capital •- Increased community
cohesion and cooperation
– Access to affordable finance
– Adding value by reducing losses or by processing Human capital •- Increase in knowledge and 15 100
skills of farmers, households and
– Adding value through organised marketing community
Physical capital •- Improvements to 6 40
infrastructure and markets
Fi i l it l I di t f 13 87

25

Barriers and challenges to the spread of
organic agriculture in Africa The sceptical viewpoints
• Knowledge
– Access to information
• If OA is so successfull, why does it not spread by itself?
– Investment of time • Will there really be enough organic matter and manure to
– Extension service intensify soil fertility management on all farms organically?
– Assistance and skills for adaptation
• Support and infrastructure • African soils cannot be improved without fertiliser
– Market access • Tropical agriculture cannot be resilient without pesticides
– Limited public and private research and innovation in organic due to occasional aggressive pest attacks
systems
• Gender, health, employment and land tenure • It is not sustainable/organic to promote export of products
– Who do the work ? And who get’s hold of the cash when other people are food insecure
income…………………… and what does he do with it…..???
– Labour availability • The human and social capital building is not an effect of
– Incentives for long-term improvements in natural capital and soil organic agriculture per se, could happen in other projects
quality
• Successfull organic cash crop production leads to
• Lack of supporting policies; contra-productive policies
• Lack of participatory development policies and institutional
monoculture and concentration of land and resources
development • ……??
• Need for radical change in AKST (IAASTD)

• Agricultural policy
Driving • Consumer demand and preferences Different pathways to improved food
forces: • Economic development
• Technological development
• Population development
intake in organic households
Food security Certified Non-certified
Characteristics dimension organic
Agro-ecological Socio-economic organic
of agricultural
conditions: conditions: agriculture
systems: agriculture
Food availability Focus on cash crops,
moderate change in
Characteristics of Organic
g management and food crop
Marketing conditions:
farming system: yields
Access to food Price premium, increased
Relative effect on income (yields, prices), stability/resilience and off-farm household income
opportunities after conversion to organic farming reinvested in food

Sustainability and Social and Food security: Food utilisation Diversified food purchases,
environmental impact economic Availability little sensitisation about
of farming systems Impacts of Access nutrition
conversion Utilization
After Hauser and Walaga, 2006)

Different pathways to improved food
intake in organic households
Food security Certified organic Non-certified organic
dimension agriculture agriculture
Food Focus on cash Focus on food crops,
availability crops, moderate changed management,
change in intensified land use
management and
g y
yield increases
food crop yields
Access to Price premium, No price premium,
food increased household little increased income, more
income reinvested in homeproduced food
food
Food Diversified food More diverse food crops
purchases, little sensitisation about nutrition
utilisation
sensitisation about (?), revalorisation of traditional
food
nutrition

26

Appendix 2
Slide hand-outs, Dr. Mwatima Juma

Exploiting the Potential of Organic Definition
agriculture:

Adoption of Agro-ecological Methods and Agro ecological in this context is defined as
Needs for Future Adaptation and production system which follows organic
Development principles with or without certification.

Presented by
Dr. Mwatima Juma

Background Background
Agro ecological system of production is dynamic and its Ecological agriculture holds significant promise
success depend on the balance mixing of indigenous and
local agricultural knowledge systems with the research for increasing the productivity of smallholder
based scientific knowledge farmers, with consequent positive impacts on food
There i a need to go beyond increase of food production,
h is d b di ff d d i security and food self-reliance.
it d f d self- li
lf
but to re-orient agro-food production systems and the
re- agro-
regulations that influence it towards sustainability
Ecological agriculture, offer farmers and their
Mainstreaming agro-ecology and sustainable agricultural
agro- families a real and affordable means to break out
practices that are socially-equitable, culturally-appropriate
socially- culturally- of poverty and achieve food security, provided
and environmentally-sustainable
environmentally- that relevant government commitment, support
and capacity-building is provided to them.
capacity-

Background Potential for Agro ecological system

Problems in accessing knowledge and
technical inputs are likely to translate into Based on Natural and Local conditions
difficulties in adopting and maintaining
p g g Reduced external input
agroecological methods of production Crop Rotations
practices Intercropping
Biological Pest Control
Erosion Control
Water Management
Nutrient Recycling

27

Potential for Agro ecological system Potential for Agro ecological system

Agro ecological system provides a more Ecological agriculture also provides
sustainable solution when it emphasises the benefits to the environment, such as
localisation of the food system, knowledge-
y knowledge-
g addressing land degradation and reducing
g g g
intensive production practices and the pollution
strengthening of social capital. Foster agro biodiversity which improves
The productivity and diversity of crops also agro ecosystem resilience, helping farmers
increases incomes and improves rural to better face risks and uncertainties.
livelihoods

Example of some of agroecological Example of some of agro ecological
practices practices
Soil and Water Conservation techniques Pest and disease control using locally
such as bund and trench construction. available materials such as neem, garlic,
Adoption of strip contouring, resulting in ashes, pheromone traps, pyrethrum,
slope stabilisation and reduced soil erosion. euphorbia
h bi
using the “Sunhemp system” to enhance Soil fertility management through legume,
soil fertility, with the added advantages of based crop rotation, rock phosphate etc
erosion prevention, fodder value, and weed, Water conservation through agro forestry,
insect and nematode control. mulch, compost

Limitations to Adoption of Agro ecological Challenges on scaling up of Agro
practices ecological agriculture
Policy framework The implementation and scaling up of
Chemical fertilizer and pesticides subsidy ecological agriculture face several
Knowledge/ Information constraints, including the lack of policy
Empowerment of smallholder farmers on the support at local, national, regional and
t t l l ti l i l d
benefit of agro ecology for sustainability of international levels, resource and capacity
their production systems constraints, and a lack of awareness and
Research and Extension- Based on both local
Extension- inadequate information, training and
and introduced knowledge tailored to research on ecological agriculture at all
smallholder levels.
Technical assistance to build capacity for
organisational and legal skills needed for
fostering agro ecology as production system

28

Challenges on adoption of Agro
What need to be done
ecological methods
Lack of research backing on most of the agroecological The resilience of agro ecosystems can only be built by
practices ( Verification of indeginous knowledge). empowering local communities, particularly women, to
Research for solution on the new challenges for organic rehabilitate, adapt and improve their natural resource base
agriculture (Climate Change) for continued productivity, and by giving them the
Shortage of technical training materials for existing proven appropriate legal backing.
pp p g g
technologies. The way forward with ecological agriculture is to work
Inadequate extension capacity. with farmers to craft a new knowledge base that starts with
key agro-ecological principles and incorporates elements
agro-
Accessibility/ availability of bio inputs (e.g pheromone of traditional knowledge and new technology in a
traps and their function to monitor insect pest populations) continually evolving process

What need to be done What need to be done
Production Policy and legislation
Improve training and extension services
Lobby the government to give explicit
Increase availability and use of ecological safe
i
inputs
t support to ecological agriculture in
Research and education national policies
Participatory knowledge sharing of researchers, Institutional development
farmers, consumers & policy makers on Enhance networking and collaboration
ecological agriculture
Participatory generation and dissemination
among stakeholders
sustainable technologies

How to do it
Production:
Use of Farmer Field School-type trainings- Give chances for farmers to
School- trainings-
integrate with their own indigenous knowledge.
Value chain approach- looking into the holistic of the system but with
approach- THANK YOU
focus on the agreed commodity- Based with underlying agro ecology
commodity-
interest
Research:
Network of research institution- building of research data base
institution-
Prioritization of research work
Publication and dissemination of useful tested technology in user friendly
language
Policy :
Continous lobbying and awareness creation
Lobby to consumers to favor agroecological produced commodities
.

29

Appendix 3
Slide hand-outs, Dr. Charles Walaga

Exploiting the potential of OA: The Content of the presentation
balance between export oriented and
diversified farming for food security • Highlight a few of the conclusions of the UNCTAD-
UNEP Report that are relevant to my presentation
• Agricultural Livelihoods of smallholder farmers
• Organíc production for the export: Its organisation in
1st African Organic Conference 2009 Uganda
(18th – 22nd May 2009
• Why the need for a balance between export oriented
and diversified farming for food security
• Strategies and actions that can facilitate the
By Charles Walaga (Phd)
CEO balancing of export oriented and diversified farming
UgoCert
ccwalaga@ugocert.org
for food security

The UNCTAD-UNEP 2008 Report on Agricultural Livelihoods of smallholder
OA and Food Security in Africa farmers
• Smallholder farmers (Subsistence farmers) in Africa
• Organic farming increases quantity of food produced directly depend on their own production for a
per farm leading to household food security substantial percentage of their food needs
• The production and selling of food surpluses at local • A diversity of crops and livestock is produced to meet
and international export markets at a premium a substantial portion of the families needs for protein,
generates higher household incomes which carbohydrates and vitamins
consolidates food security of the farmers • Diversity of other plants are also grown for medicine,
leather, building poles, fuel, etc.
• Organic farming benefits the natural environment
through improved soil fertility, water supply, flood • The diversity on the farm is responsible for
maintaining the resilience of the farm
control and biodiversity
• Diversity of the farm products enables the farm to
mitigate risk of failure of other farm enterprise(s) at
any one time

Agricultural Livelihoods cont

• Farmers sale excess food and other farm products
like cash crops (coffee, cocoa, cotton, etc), poles,
leather, fuel wood and livestock for cash to cover
cost of the food stuffs that they can not produce,
basic needs (clothing, medical care, health,
education),
education) social costs and for investing in farm
development.
• Access to the market is important in consolidating
the food security of smallholder farmers as money
earned from agricultural product sales also enables
the family to buy food when crop failures are
experienced (may be due to drought or pestilences)

30

06-08-2009

Organíc production for the export Why the need for a balance between
• Organic farm production for the export market is export oriented and diversified farming?
organized in two different ways depending on the
ownership of the organic compliance system: • Over emphasis on production for export can
undermine the food security of the family in the
– Organization of certification by the farmers and their NGO following ways:
partners leading to ownership of the organic certificate by the
farmers. In most cases, these farmers were already organic
with diversified farms. This diversity is maintained after – Labor for food production may be diverted to production for
certification the market crop
– Organization by trading company leading to ownership of – Income from the market may not be available to buy food
the organic certification by the trading company. In these because in some cases such income is often out of reach
projects there is tendency to focus technical assistance to
farmers on those plots of land occupied by the targeted of the women who are in most cases responsible for
export crop (coffee, cotton, cocoa, etc.). Some of the securing food of the family
consequences of this include: Limited integration of such – Markets for agricultural products are unstable and farmers
export crop plots with other farm enterprises, expansion of may not realize enough money to cover the cost of food
the size of plots occupied by the export crop at the expense during some years
of land reserved for food production and a tendency towards
mono-cropping of the export crop

Why the need for a balance cont.

– Cash crop failure either due to drought or pest attacks
means little or no income to cover the cost of food and
other needs
– May result into an increase in the size of land allocated to
y
the market crop at the expense of family food crops
– May result into mono-cropping hence reduced diversity
which undermines the resilience of the farm

Strategies and actions for balancing Strategies and Actions cont.
export oriented and diversified farming
for food security • There is need to develop marketing systems that
guarantee farmers a minimum income (Fair trade
• Emphasis on crop rotations and intercrops before organic?). Strengthening organic value chains and
certification is granted incorporating fair trade principles in organic
standards would be desirable
• Consideration of the proportion of the size of export
p p p
crop land to the rest of the land reserved for food • There is need for the incorporation and/or
strengthening the gender equity requirements in org
crops before certification standards
• Limits on the quantity of harvest that can be sold by • Develop appropriate tools to evaluate gender equity
a farmer in case of food crops like sesame during inspections and certification decision making

31

06-08-2009

Strategies and Actions cont. Conclusions

• Diversity of farm systems can also be facilitated by • The strategies are expensive to implement and
either supporting farmers’ organizations to be therefore will require cooperation of all stakeholders
owners of organic certification or obtaining to implement
cooperation among exporters in some form of • The gender related strategy is problematic as it is
joint ownership of the organic certification. This tantamount to intrusion into the privacy of the family
would enable them to farmers to increase the
market value of all their produce. In this way, market • Diversity of farms is not only good for household
forces would promote diversification rather than food security and income but is also central to the
mono-cropping organic concept
• Developing stronger organic value chains with
equitably balanced governance power among the
stakeholders would facilitate and promote diversity
of farms

32

Appendix 4
Slides developed by group 4 (Chain and market access)

How to support chain development and Groups
market access?
1. Current needs for global and regional networking
2. Appropriate nature, structure and responsibilities
GROUP 4 for the African Organic Agriculture Network place
22nd May 2009 for government linkages
3. Needs for organic research and research
networking in Africa to support food security and
value chains
4. Nature, roles and needs of the African Organic
Centre of Excellence

Certification Gender equity in organic projects

Farmer Group ownership of Certificate
Capacity to deal with certification Focus on men (head of families) education
Financial and risk Management This should take care of cultural aspects of
Certification to cover whole farm different target beneficiaries
Flat fee for certification
Mutual recognition of certifiers
Lower cost of certification

Marketing access Value addition

market information systems Processors need to know market needs
consumer- producer partnerships especially quality management
Farmer group exposure to markets
Collaborations with media (Radio,
newspapers)

33

Farmer organization and mobilization Retail training

Commercial orientation towards better On OA produce benefits as a marketing
yielding focus crops but maintain some strategy
diversity.
diversity Continuous market research at all levels.
Farmer group mobilization and organization
to collectively market
Direct quality management at group level
Organized farmer group leadership

Support organizations

Farmer organizations
Input providers
Service providers
Government /policy markers
Business support organizations
Financing (savings and credit)
National Platform

34

Organic Agriculture for IMPROVED Food Security in Africa

More Related Content

Similar to Organic Agriculture for IMPROVED Food Security in Africa (20)

More from Z3P (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Organic Agriculture for IMPROVED Food Security in Africa