3
Most read
9
Most read
20
Most read
Friedman Test 
The non-parametric analogue to the repeated 
measures ANOVA is the Friedman test.
First let’s review what a repeated measures ANOVA is.
First let’s review what a repeated measures ANOVA. 
A repeated measures ANOVA is used to determine if 
there is a statistically significant difference between the 
results of the same measure with the same group 
across multiple occasions.
For example, 
Number of Pizza Slices Eaten by a Group of Football Players 
Before During After 
Player 1 
Player 2 
Player 3 
Player 4 
Player 5 
Player 6 
Player 7
Here is the fictitious data: 
Number of Pizza Slices Eaten by a Group of Football Players 
Before During After 
Player 1 5 
Player 2 4 
Player 3 3 
Player 4 5 
Player 5 4 
Player 6 3 
Player 7 4
Here is the fictitious data: 
Number of Pizza Slices Eaten by a Group of Football Players 
Before During After 
Player 1 5 14 
Player 2 4 2 
Player 3 3 3 
Player 4 5 2 
Player 5 4 1 
Player 6 3 2 
Player 7 4 3
Here is the fictitious data: 
Number of Pizza Slices Eaten by a Group of Football Players 
Before During After 
Player 1 5 14 2 
Player 2 4 2 8 
Player 3 3 3 9 
Player 4 5 2 8 
Player 5 4 1 7 
Player 6 3 2 1 
Player 7 4 3 8
Here is the fictitious data: 
Number of Pizza Slices Eaten by a Group of Football Players 
Before During After 
Player 1 5 14 2 
Player 2 4 2 8 
Player 3 3 3 9 
Player 4 5 2 8 
Player 5 4 1 7 
Player 6 3 2 1 
Player 7 4 3 8 
Mean 3.9 3.4 6.9
*Note 1: 
Remember that a Repeated Measures 
ANOVA does not pin point which pair is 
significantly different. It just let’s you 
know that there is a difference. Post hoc 
tests must be performed to determine 
which pair is different.
*Note 2: 
Because a pair-wise t-test is generally 
used to determine if there is a difference 
between two separate observation 
occasions, the Repeated Measures 
ANOVA is generally used with three or 
more occasions even though it could be 
used with just two.
The Friedman test is appropriate to use when the 
underlying measurement is on an ordinal scale or the 
distribution of a dependent variable is highly skewed. 
The Friedman test will estimate whether there are 
significant differences among distributions at multiple 
(more than two) observation periods.
The Friedman test is appropriate to use when the 
underlying measurement is on an ordinal scale or the 
distribution of a dependent variable is highly skewed. 
The Friedman test will estimate whether there are 
significant differences among distributions at multiple 
(more than two) observation periods. 
While the Repeated Measures ANOVA compares group 
means, the Friedman Test compares group medians. 
Remember that a Median is less resistant to outliers
So let’s go back to our pizza-eating football player 
example: 
Number of Pizza Slices Eaten by a Group of Football Players 
Before During After 
Player 1 5 14 2 
Player 2 4 2 8 
Player 3 3 3 9 
Player 4 5 2 8 
Player 5 4 1 7 
Player 6 3 2 1 
Player 7 4 3 8 
Mean 3.9 3.4 6.9
Notice that the highlighted numbers are outliers in 
each group which can skew the results for a Repeated 
Measures ANOVA. 
Number of Pizza Slices Eaten by a Group of Football Players 
Before During After 
Player 1 5 14 2 
Player 2 4 2 8 
Player 3 3 3 9 
Player 4 5 2 8 
Player 5 4 1 7 
Player 6 3 2 1 
Player 7 4 3 8 
Mean 3.9 3.4 6.9
Because the Median is less resistant to these outliers, 
notice how the Median shows more of a separation 
between these groups. The Median in this case may 
reflect reality better than the Mean. 
Number of Pizza Slices Eaten by a Group of Football Players 
Before During After 
Player 1 5 14 2 
Player 2 4 2 8 
Player 3 3 3 9 
Player 4 5 2 8 
Player 5 4 1 7 
Player 6 3 2 1 
Player 7 4 3 8 
Mean 3.9 3.4 6.9 
Median 4.0 2.0 8.0
Friedman test is also used when the data is rank 
ordered or ordinal (no equal intervals).
So let’s say that football players have to rate the pizza 
on a scale from 1-10 in terms of its tastiness. Our 
hypothesis is that the pizza tastiness scores will change 
based on the different tasting occasions.
So let’s say that football players have to rate the pizza 
on a scale from 1-10 in terms of its tastiness. Our 
hypothesis is that the pizza tastiness scores will change 
based on the different tasting occasions. 
Football Players Opinions on Degree of Tastiness of Pizza at a 
Certain Pizza Café on a Scale of 1-10 
Before During After 
Player 1 5 10 1 
Player 2 6 8 2 
Player 3 5 9 1 
Player 4 6 9 2 
Player 5 6 7 1 
Player 6 7 10 2 
Player 7 6 9 3 
Median 6.0 9.0 2.0
Once again the median is used here because on a scale 
of 1-10 there is not an agreed upon definition usually 
on how a 1 differs from a 2 compared to how a 7 differs 
from an 8. Rating pizza taste is more subjective in 
terms of how equal the intervals are compared to the 
number of pizza slices which is a more objective 
measure.
Once again the median is used here because on a scale 
of 1-10 there is not an agreed upon definition usually 
on how a 1 differs from a 2 compared to how a 7 differs 
from an 8. Rating pizza taste is more subjective in 
terms of how equal the intervals are compared to the 
number of pizza slices which is a more objective 
measure. 
That is why in this case we would use a Friedman Test

More Related Content

PPTX
Friedman test Stat
PPTX
Reporting a Factorial ANOVA
PPT
Mann Whitney U Test
PPTX
Advance Statistics - Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
PPTX
PPT
wilcoxon signed rank test
PPTX
APPLICATION OF POISSON DISTRIBUTION
PPTX
Two way analysis of variance (anova)
Friedman test Stat
Reporting a Factorial ANOVA
Mann Whitney U Test
Advance Statistics - Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
wilcoxon signed rank test
APPLICATION OF POISSON DISTRIBUTION
Two way analysis of variance (anova)

What's hot (20)

PPTX
Reporting a one-way anova
PPTX
What is a Mann Whitney U?
PPTX
Analysis of variance (ANOVA)
PPTX
Friedman Test- A Presentation
PPTX
Mann- Whitney Test.pptx
PPTX
Karl pearson's correlation
PPTX
Reporting a Kruskal Wallis Test
PPT
regression and correlation
PPT
Independent sample t test
PPT
Chi square mahmoud
PPTX
Correlation biostatistics
PPTX
Student t-test
PPTX
What is a Kruskal Wallis-Test?
PPTX
Chi square test
PPTX
PPTX
Correlation and Regression
PPTX
Parametric tests
Reporting a one-way anova
What is a Mann Whitney U?
Analysis of variance (ANOVA)
Friedman Test- A Presentation
Mann- Whitney Test.pptx
Karl pearson's correlation
Reporting a Kruskal Wallis Test
regression and correlation
Independent sample t test
Chi square mahmoud
Correlation biostatistics
Student t-test
What is a Kruskal Wallis-Test?
Chi square test
Correlation and Regression
Parametric tests
Ad

More from Ken Plummer (20)

PPTX
Diff rel gof-fit - jejit - practice (5)
PPTX
Learn About Range - Copyright updated
PPTX
Inferential vs descriptive tutorial of when to use - Copyright Updated
PPTX
Diff rel ind-fit practice - Copyright Updated
PPTX
Normal or skewed distributions (inferential) - Copyright updated
PPTX
Normal or skewed distributions (descriptive both2) - Copyright updated
PPTX
Nature of the data practice - Copyright updated
PPTX
Nature of the data (spread) - Copyright updated
PPTX
Mode practice 1 - Copyright updated
PPTX
Nature of the data (descriptive) - Copyright updated
PPTX
Dichotomous or scaled
PPTX
Skewed less than 30 (ties)
PPTX
Skewed sample size less than 30
PPTX
Ordinal (ties)
PPTX
Ordinal and nominal
PPTX
Relationship covariates
PPTX
Relationship nature of data
PPTX
Number of variables (predictive)
PPTX
Levels of the iv
PPTX
Independent variables (2)
Diff rel gof-fit - jejit - practice (5)
Learn About Range - Copyright updated
Inferential vs descriptive tutorial of when to use - Copyright Updated
Diff rel ind-fit practice - Copyright Updated
Normal or skewed distributions (inferential) - Copyright updated
Normal or skewed distributions (descriptive both2) - Copyright updated
Nature of the data practice - Copyright updated
Nature of the data (spread) - Copyright updated
Mode practice 1 - Copyright updated
Nature of the data (descriptive) - Copyright updated
Dichotomous or scaled
Skewed less than 30 (ties)
Skewed sample size less than 30
Ordinal (ties)
Ordinal and nominal
Relationship covariates
Relationship nature of data
Number of variables (predictive)
Levels of the iv
Independent variables (2)
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
BP 704 T. NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS (UNIT 1)
PDF
CISA (Certified Information Systems Auditor) Domain-Wise Summary.pdf
PDF
International_Financial_Reporting_Standa.pdf
PDF
BP 704 T. NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS (UNIT 2).pdf
PPTX
ELIAS-SEZIURE AND EPilepsy semmioan session.pptx
PDF
LIFE & LIVING TRILOGY - PART - (2) THE PURPOSE OF LIFE.pdf
PDF
semiconductor packaging in vlsi design fab
PDF
Vision Prelims GS PYQ Analysis 2011-2022 www.upscpdf.com.pdf
PDF
HVAC Specification 2024 according to central public works department
PDF
Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment .pdf
PDF
LEARNERS WITH ADDITIONAL NEEDS ProfEd Topic
PPTX
B.Sc. DS Unit 2 Software Engineering.pptx
PDF
BP 505 T. PHARMACEUTICAL JURISPRUDENCE (UNIT 1).pdf
PDF
medical_surgical_nursing_10th_edition_ignatavicius_TEST_BANK_pdf.pdf
PDF
MICROENCAPSULATION_NDDS_BPHARMACY__SEM VII_PCI .pdf
PPTX
Education and Perspectives of Education.pptx
PPTX
Virtual and Augmented Reality in Current Scenario
PPTX
What’s under the hood: Parsing standardized learning content for AI
PDF
David L Page_DCI Research Study Journey_how Methodology can inform one's prac...
PDF
What if we spent less time fighting change, and more time building what’s rig...
BP 704 T. NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS (UNIT 1)
CISA (Certified Information Systems Auditor) Domain-Wise Summary.pdf
International_Financial_Reporting_Standa.pdf
BP 704 T. NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS (UNIT 2).pdf
ELIAS-SEZIURE AND EPilepsy semmioan session.pptx
LIFE & LIVING TRILOGY - PART - (2) THE PURPOSE OF LIFE.pdf
semiconductor packaging in vlsi design fab
Vision Prelims GS PYQ Analysis 2011-2022 www.upscpdf.com.pdf
HVAC Specification 2024 according to central public works department
Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment .pdf
LEARNERS WITH ADDITIONAL NEEDS ProfEd Topic
B.Sc. DS Unit 2 Software Engineering.pptx
BP 505 T. PHARMACEUTICAL JURISPRUDENCE (UNIT 1).pdf
medical_surgical_nursing_10th_edition_ignatavicius_TEST_BANK_pdf.pdf
MICROENCAPSULATION_NDDS_BPHARMACY__SEM VII_PCI .pdf
Education and Perspectives of Education.pptx
Virtual and Augmented Reality in Current Scenario
What’s under the hood: Parsing standardized learning content for AI
David L Page_DCI Research Study Journey_how Methodology can inform one's prac...
What if we spent less time fighting change, and more time building what’s rig...

What is a Friedman Test?

  • 1. Friedman Test The non-parametric analogue to the repeated measures ANOVA is the Friedman test.
  • 2. First let’s review what a repeated measures ANOVA is.
  • 3. First let’s review what a repeated measures ANOVA. A repeated measures ANOVA is used to determine if there is a statistically significant difference between the results of the same measure with the same group across multiple occasions.
  • 4. For example, Number of Pizza Slices Eaten by a Group of Football Players Before During After Player 1 Player 2 Player 3 Player 4 Player 5 Player 6 Player 7
  • 5. Here is the fictitious data: Number of Pizza Slices Eaten by a Group of Football Players Before During After Player 1 5 Player 2 4 Player 3 3 Player 4 5 Player 5 4 Player 6 3 Player 7 4
  • 6. Here is the fictitious data: Number of Pizza Slices Eaten by a Group of Football Players Before During After Player 1 5 14 Player 2 4 2 Player 3 3 3 Player 4 5 2 Player 5 4 1 Player 6 3 2 Player 7 4 3
  • 7. Here is the fictitious data: Number of Pizza Slices Eaten by a Group of Football Players Before During After Player 1 5 14 2 Player 2 4 2 8 Player 3 3 3 9 Player 4 5 2 8 Player 5 4 1 7 Player 6 3 2 1 Player 7 4 3 8
  • 8. Here is the fictitious data: Number of Pizza Slices Eaten by a Group of Football Players Before During After Player 1 5 14 2 Player 2 4 2 8 Player 3 3 3 9 Player 4 5 2 8 Player 5 4 1 7 Player 6 3 2 1 Player 7 4 3 8 Mean 3.9 3.4 6.9
  • 9. *Note 1: Remember that a Repeated Measures ANOVA does not pin point which pair is significantly different. It just let’s you know that there is a difference. Post hoc tests must be performed to determine which pair is different.
  • 10. *Note 2: Because a pair-wise t-test is generally used to determine if there is a difference between two separate observation occasions, the Repeated Measures ANOVA is generally used with three or more occasions even though it could be used with just two.
  • 11. The Friedman test is appropriate to use when the underlying measurement is on an ordinal scale or the distribution of a dependent variable is highly skewed. The Friedman test will estimate whether there are significant differences among distributions at multiple (more than two) observation periods.
  • 12. The Friedman test is appropriate to use when the underlying measurement is on an ordinal scale or the distribution of a dependent variable is highly skewed. The Friedman test will estimate whether there are significant differences among distributions at multiple (more than two) observation periods. While the Repeated Measures ANOVA compares group means, the Friedman Test compares group medians. Remember that a Median is less resistant to outliers
  • 13. So let’s go back to our pizza-eating football player example: Number of Pizza Slices Eaten by a Group of Football Players Before During After Player 1 5 14 2 Player 2 4 2 8 Player 3 3 3 9 Player 4 5 2 8 Player 5 4 1 7 Player 6 3 2 1 Player 7 4 3 8 Mean 3.9 3.4 6.9
  • 14. Notice that the highlighted numbers are outliers in each group which can skew the results for a Repeated Measures ANOVA. Number of Pizza Slices Eaten by a Group of Football Players Before During After Player 1 5 14 2 Player 2 4 2 8 Player 3 3 3 9 Player 4 5 2 8 Player 5 4 1 7 Player 6 3 2 1 Player 7 4 3 8 Mean 3.9 3.4 6.9
  • 15. Because the Median is less resistant to these outliers, notice how the Median shows more of a separation between these groups. The Median in this case may reflect reality better than the Mean. Number of Pizza Slices Eaten by a Group of Football Players Before During After Player 1 5 14 2 Player 2 4 2 8 Player 3 3 3 9 Player 4 5 2 8 Player 5 4 1 7 Player 6 3 2 1 Player 7 4 3 8 Mean 3.9 3.4 6.9 Median 4.0 2.0 8.0
  • 16. Friedman test is also used when the data is rank ordered or ordinal (no equal intervals).
  • 17. So let’s say that football players have to rate the pizza on a scale from 1-10 in terms of its tastiness. Our hypothesis is that the pizza tastiness scores will change based on the different tasting occasions.
  • 18. So let’s say that football players have to rate the pizza on a scale from 1-10 in terms of its tastiness. Our hypothesis is that the pizza tastiness scores will change based on the different tasting occasions. Football Players Opinions on Degree of Tastiness of Pizza at a Certain Pizza Café on a Scale of 1-10 Before During After Player 1 5 10 1 Player 2 6 8 2 Player 3 5 9 1 Player 4 6 9 2 Player 5 6 7 1 Player 6 7 10 2 Player 7 6 9 3 Median 6.0 9.0 2.0
  • 19. Once again the median is used here because on a scale of 1-10 there is not an agreed upon definition usually on how a 1 differs from a 2 compared to how a 7 differs from an 8. Rating pizza taste is more subjective in terms of how equal the intervals are compared to the number of pizza slices which is a more objective measure.
  • 20. Once again the median is used here because on a scale of 1-10 there is not an agreed upon definition usually on how a 1 differs from a 2 compared to how a 7 differs from an 8. Rating pizza taste is more subjective in terms of how equal the intervals are compared to the number of pizza slices which is a more objective measure. That is why in this case we would use a Friedman Test